No. Chiang and Mao would have likely been nobodies if the 1910s were handled better by people like Yuan Shikai and co. Yuan Shikai’s unsuccessful power grab was the reason why China was in a perpetual state of civil war till the 1950s. Chiang and Mao are largely irrelevant because by the time they came to power, the age of battleship was already on the way out, and China too damaged by the civil wars.Because those two idiots were the main reason China was not unified until 1950.
China’s hopes of getting dreadnoughts thus rested in butterflying the fracture of the 1910s which caused the decades long civil wars in the first place, not some naval successes in the 1880s-1890s. They alone won’t solve a twat if the collapse of the Qing Dynasty still occurred as violently as otl.What you also failed to realize is that even with the regionalisms, the Beiyang navy was de facto the national navy, with the Nanyang navy’s best ships regularly poached by them.The central government had to power to reassign ships to the Beiyang navy and the Beiyang navy was clearly the central government’s favorite.
Last edited: