I'm aware of pro-independence countries sending military support to separatists or giving them refuge in "security pockets" to rest/rearm/regroup between guerilla raids or directly intervening on their behalf against Serbs, if arms supplies and refuge for separatists paramilitaries did not achieve desired outcome.
What are you talking about? military support? Direct intervention?
But you might be right about safe areas. MAkes sense Serbs overran one at srebrenica and removed that threat
I'm not aware of any anti-independence or pro-"law and order" attempts to assist Serbs or prevent Croats/Bosniaks/Albanians from cleansing Serbs.
Would impsoing arms embargo on all sides count? Seeing how serbs inherited the heavy stuff from Yugoslav army and others, well, didn't?
Oh well, I know one and proud of it, since they were Canadian forces who intervened to prevent ethnic cleansing performed by Croatians. What did happen next, you wonder? Canadians were hastily transferred to another area by leadership of the "impartial UN peacekeepers" and cleansing renewed with gusto.
Would that refer to Medak pocket, by any chance?
Do you still wonder why Serbs view ones who provided guns and refuge to their killers and bombed them as being less than friendly?
If anybody should be less then friendly to outsiders it should be Croats and Bosniacs because other nations simply didn't allow them to get weapons to defend themselves. serbs were top togs and have about as much right to complain about how things turned out as Germans have for devastation of their coutnry in 1945. What you sow is what you reap.