MacCaulay said:Steve: I was thinking about those political problems when I came up with the first timeline: I realized that if the Americans were to make a few early victories and then stop to offer terms while the French were still fighting the British, then the Napoleon might decide it would be worth it to decamp his force for some British post that would do more damage to his immediate enemy, and take a reduced sum for the Territory from the Americans.
It seems that the French government's main hope would be that at some point early in the campaign, the Americans fall flat on their face, and decide to act like it never happened.
Thoughts?
MacCaulay
Sorry about the slow reply but been very busy this week so 1st look at the pre-1900 board since last Sunday!
It might be a possibility although one problem would be the vast distances involved. Napoleon was not one for allowing much initiative in his sub-ordinates so you have the problem of who the US negotiate with and when. If they have to try talking to Paris, even if he doesn't have to leave to fight in eastern Europe, it would take time. Things could change dramatically in the Americans while that was going on. [Alternatively, if the US wins some early victories as you suggest and then offer negotiations will they believe the local French commander when he says something like we’ll agree a cease-fire and contact Paris who will let you know in a few months?]
I would also suspect, unless they really balls up, the French to win the initial encounters. They would have very tough veteran troops and probably the support of the local population, both colonial and Indian. The US would have to expand from its very small peacetime base, which traditionally means a lot of militia who tended to be unreliable in combat and commanders who needed the dead-wood thinning out. They could find a Jackson type leader who might hold his own but I would expect the 1st year or so to be pretty rough for the Americans unless the French over-extend themselves.
If a deal was agreed where would the French troops go? Difficult to see them going somewhere by sea with British control. If they march through the US to attack Canada then, a) Britain is pissed off with the US, which may suit Boney but could be nasty for the US and b) how and where do they trace supply from? Unless the US would be willing to switch sides totally and work with the French as allies, say agreeing they could have Canada? This might be difficult given the conservative nature of the French in Canada and also would the US feeling happier with Boney rather than George III as their neighbour?
Steve