The Sandman
Banned
well, i admit that i am extremely ignorant on canadian history, and i feel a bit more enlightened on Canada.
I have only studied the aforementioned fields for my GCSEs and AS levels, as well as Early British history and a bit on the the Aztec empire.
And forgive my narrow minded view on my ignorant comments about recent history, and am in no way related to Greg gutfield.
I hope we can these recent comments behind us.
Good thing, because if Canada was really like you thought it was then why would we want them?
I mean, I'd love to see the end of the Maple Curtain, but I'll freely admit that that's not likely with a POD and time limit both set in the 20th century.
Well, maybe with some much earlier version of NAFTA that's more like the EU in terms of a customs union, currency union, and end of border controls. But even then, you're more likely to see the US and Canada creating some third supra-national organization to represent their joint interests and continuing to manage their own domestic policy.
Now what might be interesting is if said organization gained a bit more meaning by the US and Canada offering entry to the former British, Dutch and French colonies in the Caribbean. Plus Panama, which is pretty much a US puppet at this point. And eventually even some of the Latin American countries might be offered entry (Brazil is likely just because, aside from the potential size of its market, it's culturally and linguistically distinct from the rest of Latin America and would therefore be considered a balance against, say, Mexico).
Let's call this thing the OAS.