I really don't think so. England was too much smaller than France to ever conquer it and hold for long. France was a stronger country until the 18th century. The reason England never could hold on to large parts of France for very long was it simply didn't have the resources. I think England could have held on to its Brétigny gains (planning to do a timeline about this in the near future) with the right luck, but thats about it. In my current timeline, a surviving Henry V is able to conquer France by exploiting division among the French princes and continuing the Burgundian alliance, but this is a unique event.
After the losses of Gascony and Normany in the 1450s, England did not hold any significant continental territory except Calais. Conquering France from Calais would be pretty much impossible, the French side of the pale was very well fortified. I think that the holding onto the French title was more ceremonial than an actual claim, especially past the 15th century. Plus, the English claim was always more a bargaining counter for territory than a serious claim, except when Henry V actually tried to enforce it.
Scipio