1. No, it was not concerted, unless you believe that all the colonists who perpetuated the massacres were plotting out their campaign together, or that everything happened on the orders of the colonial authorities.
2. I put forward a point of view that is accepted by large segments of both academia and the general public.
3. Also, do you actually have anything to suggest that Windschuttle is a white supremacist. Or to disprove anything he said on this subject.
1. Concerted simply means a strenous effort. It's not the same as "conspiring together" like you seem to think.
You argue that it was basically a few sporadic attacks, which it wasn't.
2.Academia? No. Windschuttle has very few supporters among history professionals. His research is so poor and his racism so blatant he can't even get hired.
That there may be a sizable chunk of white Australians in denial that there was genocide doesn't surprise me. There's a large number of white American who'd deny genocide happened in the US, and a smaller number of Germans who'd still deny genocide happened under the Nazis also. (Defeat tends to force people to be more honest.)
3. Both are extremely easy to find. A ten second google seach will give you this for example on his falsehoods.
http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lab/85/grieves.html
Windschuttle's Fabrication of Aboriginal History : a View from the Other Side Vicki Grieves
How Windschuttle's argument is white supremacist is discussed here, and the support he receives from fellow racists as well.
-----------------
http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=328
But even history is a battleground, in which "revisionists" - the likes of
Keith Windschuttle, a self-publishing and much-publicised "new historian" - can
suggest that Tasmanian Aborigines lacked humanity and compassion. Not anywhere in the world with indigenous populations, not in North America, New Zealand, even South Africa, could you get away with such a slur.
Windschuttle has been the darling of an influential group of white supremacists, who buzz around the far-right magazine Quadrant (once funded by the CIA). They deploy their arguments in a manner not dissimilar to the way David Irving used his history texts to promote Holocaust denial, with the difference that they have been given generous space and tacit support in the press. In rejecting what they call "the black armband view of history", they claim, absurdly, that mass killing and resistance in Australia did not happen, nor many of the horrific separations of Aboriginal children from their families, ordered by the state.
-----------------
http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol5no1_2006/perera_raceterror.htm
22. Anglo-Australian men as an endangered species in the law are only a part of Fraser's apocalyptic vision of the future. In an article, "Rethinking the White Australia Policy" (a review of Keith Windschuttle's book, The White Australia Policy), Fraser asserts:
Within two or three decades, it is not unreasonable to expect that Australia will have a heavily Asian managerial-professional, ruling class that will not hesitate to promote the interests of co-ethnics at the expense of white Australians. (Fraser 2005b).
23. Fraser supports this statement with the fantastic notion, as recapped by Windschuttle, that "Europeans ... evolved in a cold climate to support non-kinship forms of reciprocity and thus to welcome strangers," while "Chinese and Japanese businessmen operate within mafia-like, extended family clans that are bound by shared genes to support one another" (Windschuttle 2005)....
Despite their internal differences, however, Windschuttle, Fraser and Duffy represent an institutionalised and politically powerful configuration of contemporary Australian nationalism that exists on a continuum with assertions of race pride that are usually disowned as extremist....
30.
The most distinctive feature of the formation represented by Duffy and Windschuttle is its foregrounding of Anglo-Australian achievement and white racial pride. Its platform is premised on a whitewashing (Manne 2003) of Australian history, especially of the violence directed towards Indigenous people and their ongoing resistances.
------------------
Windschuttle also appeared in a racist propaganda film with two fellow white supremacists, David Yeagley and Barbara Lindsay, members of the extremist One Nation (not affiliated to Australia's One Nation, but with a similar POV).
http://davidyeagley.blogspot.com/2008/02/open-letter-to-makers-of-prisoners-of.html
And note that white supremacists use the term "black armband view of history" the same as you. If you claim to not be racist or white supremacist yourself, you really should quit falling for their lies.