Interesting...I can see how you approached it, very cool
Some points I'd like to bring up;
1) I would probably change "Supervising Journeyman Apprentice" to something like "Leading Journeyman Apprentice" or "Master Journeyman Apprentice" to avoid confusion with Senior JA's in acronym form (SJA and SJA).
Good point.
2) So regarding the combat ranks, Lancemen 2nd. Class are aircrew like aerial gunners and loadmasters, Lancemen 1st Class are bombardiers on strategic bombers, and Air Armsmen are enlisted pilots? Also, who would perform military law enforcement duties and/or base defense, the Aircraftsmen or Lancemen?
If these functions were in the hands of the Air Force rather than handled by the Army, I would envision these as duties for Aircraftsmen (Security). Combat personnel are peoiple who fight aircraft. Anyone whose job is securing bases or keeping rowdy men in line would not be dignified with that title. This Air Force has a very strong investment in the mystique of its 'knights of the skies'.
3) I see you're sticking with knightly unit designations as well; "lance", "conroi", etc. Would this naming scheme extend to this Air Force's ground organizations/units as well?
I imagine it would, though I think instead of 'Lance' they would choose something less combative. Of course the whole thing would quickly become quite impractical. My main idea was imagining a group of public-school educated gentlemen hashing out titles and ranks for a system over a Morris-designed table in a neogothic study hung with pre-raphaelite pictures.