Across the high frontier: a Big Gemini space TL

Introduction
  • Archibald

    Banned
    Introduction

    Most of you are familiar with the 1969 recommendations of the Space Task Group that the U.S. accept a post-Apollo goal of manned planetary exploration before the end of the century (…) What if, instead of rejecting that report out of hand in the aftermath of Apollo, Nixon said, “Yes, we’ll do that.” What might have happened? There is a fascinating book called by British engineer Stephen Baxter that starts with exactly this premise. The novel describes the first mission to Mars in the 1980s! It’s a very enjoyable piece of counterfactual history.”

    NASA historian John Logsdon, 2001


    Most of NASA’s budget had been sucked into manned spaceflight. Unmanned projects had been subordinated to the needs of the Mars mission or cut altogether. They had lost a gravity-assist flight to Venus and Mercury, asteroid and comet encounters, Grand Tour probes to the outer planets. The Large Space Telescope, a big Earth-orbital eye, had also been axed.
    Sure, humans were on the way to Mars. But humanity knew nothing of the rest of the Solar System it hadn’t known in 1957: the moon of Jupiter and Saturn remained points of light in the sky, the disks and rings of the giant worlds a telescopic blur.”

    Stephen Baxter, Voyage
     
    Last edited:
    martian fantasy
  • Archibald

    Banned
    martian fantasy

    (note: the concept of living martians is obviously ASB. It was only a trick for toying with Mars perihelic oppositions across the 20th century)

    "Mars had rendezvous with Earth. The blind game of celestial mechanics carried the planets in orbit around the Sun. A long time before, Kepler had demonstrated that planets orbited their mother stars at different speeds; the farther the slower.


    Mars orbited the Sun in 687 days, twice as much as the most immediate inner planet, a blue marble. From times to times, the red globe and the blue planet got very close – 55 million kilometres at best. That was called perihelic oppositions, and happened on a regular cycle of fifteen (sometimes seventeen) years.

    As astronomy progressed in the eighteen and nineteen centuries, Mars perihelic oppositions grew in importance. Ground based telescopes were pushed to their limits; photographs showed a pale, ocher disk with some discernible features such as a black, triangular scar: Syrtis Major.

    Had an advanced Martian civilization ever existed, understood human calendars, and observed Earth during perihelic oppositions, that civilization would have had mixed feelings. For centuries it looked like nothing moved; humans were focused on Earth-bound worries – plagues, wars, political struggles, revolutions.

    Then, at the end of the nineteenth century, Earth inhabitants slowly progressed toward the sky.
    There was a good reason for that.
    The Earth was a pretty massive planet, and in turn this meant a deep gravity well. The deep gravity well made orbit from the surface, and escape, damn difficult.
    Very ironically, Mars being much less massive its gravity well was much less deeper, and reaching from the red planet surface was easier.


    The amount of energy to reach space was called the delta-V, expressed in kilometer per second. To put things into perspective, top speed of the fastest aircraft ever build on planet Earth, the SR-71 Blackbird, was a single kilometer per second - three thousand and six hundred kilometer per hour.
    Orbital speed however was seven kilometer per second - seven time more., or worse, because the rocket equation featured a logarithm that made things even harder.

    That was, in itself, a daring challenge. On top of that was a thick atmosphere entailing a lot of drag and two more kilometer per second, up to nine time the SR-71 speed ! Only rockets achieved the feat, but they paid a high cost to it. The expense of energy to climb at the edge of Earth gravity well was so large that the mass of propellant to burn was just overwhelming.

    Early in the history of spaceflight it had been calculated that a rocket build as a single, monolithic vehicle would have to be 92% of propellants by itself. The 8% that remain would have to be, well, the rocket itself - the tanks around the propellants, and the rocket around the tanks - including the engines, guidance system, structure and, obviously, the payload to be sent to orbit ! That in itself explained why rockets staged.

    The optimal number of stages had been found to be three, so three stages would be crammed with propellants, stacked one above each other, and fired in sequence. Its propellant exhausted the stage would be casted off, falling back to Earth. The higher and the fastest the stage separated, the harder it hit Earth thick atmosphere.
    Needless to say, destruction usually followed; bringing the stages back to Earth surface for reuse would have been theorically feasible, but it added immense costs and complexity.
    So the big rockets usually destroyed themselves to place a tiny payload into orbit. The only way for stage reuse to make sense, cost wise, was to launch a lot, and there was hardly enough satellites to justify higher flight rates...

    The August 4, 1892 perihelic opposition showed the Martians humans vain efforts to left the ground - Lilienthal gliders, Ader and Maxim steam-powered unworkable machines.

    Seventeen years passed, then September 24, 1909 brought another opposition. Humans had not progressed much, still flying in small hops.

    Fifteen years later, in 1924 the Martians found the blue marble in a state of distress. There had been some god awful war, killing millions.

    Next opposition, August 24 1939, was no better. It looked as if the humans were on the bring of another, even more deadly war. More advanced aircrafts were flying, but humans had yet to make their first leap into space.

    Mars came close again on September 10, 1956 and the Martians were startled. This time there were rockets, plenty of them, although primitive. Scanning of Earth near-space showed nothing, but ten day later the observers were given an interesting show. They saw a rocket climbing to near orbital speed, and caught a name they would be familiar with in the next future: Wernher von Braun.

    That night at the Cape Mars glowed bright orange-red in Florida sky. Ten days before the faster Earth had overtaken Mars and now raced ahead. Wernher Von Braun looked at Mars with mixed feelings.
    Today had been a baby step in the direction of new worlds. But the fourth stage of the rocket had been filled with sand, not propellant, because the Navy Project Vanguard had priority over the Army for which von Braun teams worked.

    Nothing could have prepared the Martians to what happened before the next perihelic opposition. The Martians did not expected any news from Earth before that date, but the terrans were apparently progressing faster and faster.

    Soon robots started to rain, most of them dead – humans still had to learn building durable electronics. In 1965, however, an Earth robot reached Mars in working state, and snapped some photos. Other robots overflew the planet on regular occasions, bigger and better ones. And in the late 60’s Mars yet again closed from Earth, closer and closer until August 10, 1971.

    For a long time now the Martians had learned about Earth rocket launches, counting successes and failures, the proportion between the two rapidly inverting as humans progressed.
    The Martians first scanned Earth orbit, and found it populated by hundred of robots, a marking contrast with 1956. They watched humans timid steps in outer space, to Earth huge satellite they called the Moon.
    The Martians caught again the name of von Braun, and were excited by what they found.
    By contrast with 1956 and its near-orbital attempts the man was now building the immense rockets that carried men to Earth satellite. Going back to 1969, they found that plans had been discussed to send men farther – to their planet !
    So they prepared for the invasion, and calculated the next oppositions. There would be two close-up, in 1986 and 1988. And the next one, in 2003, would be the closest ever since 60 000 years. So from 1971 onwards the Martians patiently waited for the invasion. Because they were so much advanced than humans they had nothing to fear, no anger nor resent. They were just waiting…"
     
    Last edited:
    Apollo 8 - part 1
  • Archibald

    Banned
    The Apollo 8 decision, August 1968

    Friday August 9, 1968


    MARILYN, WE ARE GOING TO THE MOON !


    The truth hit Judy Wyatt like an evidence. She already knew. She knew it all the time. She had been a silent witness of history.

    That day the clock marked 8:45 in the morning when George Low, head of the Apollo program office left his suite, a large paneled office with space for a conference table and windows looking out over Clear Lake to the east of the Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas.

    Houston was at the heart of NASA and the Apollo program; and between flights, Houston center of gravity was there, Building 2, the nine-story headquarters building at the south end of the complex. The higher the floor, the higher the position.

    Thus when George Low had became top manager of the Apollo Office, taking a demotion from his old position as deputy director of the center, his office shifted from the top floor, the ninth, down to the seventh. And he had the best team of secretaries with him – Marylin Bockting and Judy Wyatt and many others. It was the same as with any large business - the bosses came and went, but the good executive secretaries lasted forever.

    Marylin Bockting had held her secretarial job at the Manned Spaceflight Center for many years, had served plenty of NASA managers, and if the truth were known she probably had as good a feel for what was going on within the Apollo program as did engineers in the adjacent office.
    "There had been a lot of 007s over the last weeks," Wyatt said. "so I knew that something important was bound to happen. But you knew the exact details all the time !"
    Marylin Bockting just smiled. The so-called 007s were internal memos shrouded in secrecy. Only George Low and his secretary would know the contains.

    Perhaps one day I will reveal the exact process by what the first men went around the Moon. I could add that my boss George Low was a James Bond fan. I felt like Monneypenny, destroying classified memos that shall never leak to the outside world.

    "Yes, they want to go the Moon as soon as possible, Judy. Perhaps you already know that from the 007s Low and Kraft and Slayton exchanged over the last three months. What's new is that the mission will happen earlier, before the end of this year, and without any lunar module, since the thing's not ready."

    Meanwhile George Low walked from his office up the two flights of stairs to Bob Gilruth' s office. This is probably the most important day of my life Low thought as he shook hand of Gilruth. They briefly spoke behind closed doors. Low and Robert Gilruth then met with director of flight operations Chris Kraft. And Low dropped the bombshell.
    "Gentleman, we should turn Apollo 8 into a lunar orbit mission. It’s now or never." To this point Apollo 8 had been an Earth orbit mission. NASA was still recovering from the fire that had killed astronauts White, Chaffee and Grissom a day of January 1967.
    Gilruth was highly enthusiastic. So was Kraft.
    At 9:30 a.m. Low, Gilruth and Kraft met astronaut boss Donald “Deke” Slayton, and they unanimously decided to seek support from legendary Wernher von Braun and Apollo Program Director Samuel Phillips. From there the news spread; all across the United States phones were ringing, with secretaries handling the communications.
    Gilruth called von Braun and, after briefly outlining the plan, asked if they could meet in Huntsville, Alabama, that afternoon.
    Low called Phillips, who was at the Kennedy Spaceflight Center, Florida, and asked whether he and KSC Director Kurt Debus could participate in the meeting.
    And on, and on, all across the American nation.

    The meeting was set up for 2:30.

    Five hours later, Low entered Marshall Spaceflight Center auditorium. Key people in the Apollo program were all there. They were Werner Von Braun, Eberhard Rees, Lee James, Ludie Richard, Sam Phillips and George Hage, Kurt Debus and Rocco Petrone, Gilruth, Kraft, Slayton - for seven years these men had devoted their lives to Kennedy great endeavour, landing a man on the Moon before the decade was out.

    George Low opened the meeting.
    "Yes, we can fly a lunar orbit mission within six months. The hardware is ready. This is technically feasible if Apollo 7 proves successful. If not, well, Apollo 8 will simply orbit Earth as planned. Chris ?"
    Kraft said "I'm with George. Let me insist on the fact that we have to orbit the moon, not simply flyby it. This way we strengthen the case for a lunar Apollo 8; the crew will snap pictures of future landing sites for a day. Sam, a word about Kennedy Space Center ?"
    Sam Phillips "I'm go. I can't see any obstacle to launch before December 1"
    Neither Marshall engineers found any difficulties.
    Then Bob Gilruth just said " I'm go, to. We only need to look at the differences between spacecraft 103 and 106 and find a substitute for the Lunar Module. A big ballast heavy enough to reassure the Saturn guidance system."
    A ballast ?” George Low asked
    Yeah, we need a mass close enough from a Lunar Module. The lunar module weights 15 tons and stands at the tip of the 300 feet long Saturn. With the pogo that happened with AS-502, we have to be careful with the rocket weight balance. So we need some ballast to be placed below the 30 tons, fully-fueled Apollo CSM.”
    Ok.” All of suden George Low had an idea. An idea that was straight out of a James Bond movie he was fan of. Surely, there were all kind of uninteresting ballasts and dummy Lunar Modules to be carried by AS-503. But...
    Low focused his attention back on the meeting and concluded it
    "So technically we are go. Next step is to convince top management. Unfortunately, at this crucial moment our top management is on leave. Indeed you all know that George Mueller and Jim Webb are on their way to the UNISPACE conference in Vienna, with a stopover in London. They are out for the next two weeks !"

    Mueller was head of NASA manned spaceflight office, while Webb was the agency top Administrator. Present this day was Thomas Paine, the second highest ranking manager or Deputy Administrator.

    And Paine was enthusiast.
    "Today Mueller and Webb attend a meeting of the British Interplanetary Society in London. After that they will go to the UNISPACE 1 conference in Vienna, staying there for a week or so. We can't wait for them to return; the agenda is too tight. I suggest we ask them straight, then that we meet a second time in Washington next week to discuss the result. August 14 would then be decision day. Sam ?"
    Sam Philips answered "Well, if we agree I will then go to Vienna and discuss the plan with them."
    Low day was not over. He had another meeting later in the evening - to find a ballast to be substituted to the Lunar Module and ensure North American Apollo moonship was ready. A ballast ? – he was haunted with a truly outlandish idea - but he had to check first whether that was feasible or not.

    As far as he knew, the vehicle Low had in mind had been tantalizingly close to flight capability when it was canceled the year before. At that time, two of the planned five flight units were close to completion. In fact, the first unit was to begin vibration/acoustic testing at the Manned Spaceflight Center in Houston on September 15, 1967. Low knew they were in storage – they had not been destroyed, not yet.


    George_M_Low.gif

    George M. Low
     
    Last edited:
    Space shuttle: early moves
  • Archibald

    Banned
    Saturday August 10, 1968

    The British Interplanetary Society headquarters

    London University College.



    I believe that the exploitation of space is limited in concept and extent by the very high cost of putting payload into orbit, and the inaccessibility of objects after they have been launched. Therefore, I would forecast that the next major thrust in space will be the development of an economical launch vehicle for shuttling between Earth and the installations, such as the orbiting space stations which will soon be operating in space […]

    Essential to the continuous operation of the space station will be the capability to resupply expendables as well as to change and/or augment crews and laboratory equipment.... Our studies show that using today's hardware, the resupply cost for a year equals the original cost of the space station […]

    Therefore, there is a real requirement for an efficient earth-to-orbit transportation system-an economical Space Shuttle.... ideally it would be able to operate in a mode similar to that of large commercial air transports and be compatible with the environment of major airports....

    The cockpit of the space shuttle would be similar to that of the large intercontinental jet aircraft, containing all instrumentation essential to complete on-board checkout.... Interestingly enough, the basic design described above for an economical space shuttle from earth to orbit could also be applied to terrestrial point-to-point transport […]

    The Space Shuttle is another step toward our Destiny, another hand-hold on our future. We will go where we choose-on our earth-throughout our solar system and through our galaxy-eventually to live on other worlds of our universe. Man will never be satisfied with less than that"


    (NASA deputy administrator George E. Mueller)

    (NOTE: there has been a small retcon at the end of post 16, when George Low is searching for a ballast to go with the Apollo 8 CSM)

     
    Last edited:
    Apollo 8 - part 2
  • Archibald

    Banned
    August 20, 1968
    George Low tried to relax in his office. That handful of vacation days in the Caribbean had been delightful – in July but was already so far way ! He had been working ninety hours a week since the Apollo fire, replacing poor Joe Shea that had suffered a nervous breakdown; the man had literally destroyed himself during the investigation.
    The last three days had been exhausting; he could see how Sam Philips face was marked.
    Doesn’t matter,the decision had been made.

    Philips and Paine had phoned to Vienna to discuss the tentative Apollo 8 lunar mission with Webb and Mueller.
    Webb wanted to think about it, and requested further information by diplomatic carrier. He had been shocked and fairly negative. So Paine and Philips sent Webb a lengthy discourse on why the mission should be changed.

    He will change his mind with a successful Apollo 7 mission.” Philips told Low. “By the way, Mueller sided with us. He now agree the plan, with reserve. No full announcement will be made until after the Apollo 7 flight; then, it will be announced that Saturn V number three will be manned and possible missions are being studied, but still no mention of a flight around the Moon. Meanwhile an internal document will be prepared for a planned lunar orbit for December.“
    Talk about shift in plans. That third Saturn V - it was first to fly unmanned, then to carry a whole lunar stack around Earth. Then we moved the mission to a lunar orbit, before dropping the lunar module since it was not yet ready. George Low realized.
    And then the signification of it stroke him.
    He had essentially make the novel Around the Moon real.

    Jules Verne, nous voilà !


    'Around_the_Moon'_by_Bayard_and_Neuville_38.jpg


    tumblr_mvp7ayPD5U1rhb9f5o2_r1_1280.jpg

     
    Last edited:
    Soviets in space (1)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    NOTE: most of that post is NOT MINE.
    It is taken from a book :
    Soviet and Russian Lunar Exploration by Brian Harvey (2007)
    I prefer telling it from the start - no question of plagiarism.

    Harvey description of a manned Zond mission was just superb. I really needed to integrate it in my TL.

    December 9, 1968


    "The Proton rocket had been fuelled up about eight hours before liftoff.

    The crew - Alexei Leonov and Oleg Makarov – had gone aboard 2.5 hours before liftoff. Dressed in light grey coveralls and communication soft hats, standing at the bottom of the lift that would bring them up to the cabin, they had offered some words of encourage-ment to the launch crews overseeing the mission.


    The payload went on internal power from two hours before liftoff.


    The pad area is then evacuated and the tower rolled back to 200 m distant, leaving the rocket standing completely free. There may be a wisp of oxidizer blowing off the top stage, but otherwise the scene is eerily silent, for these are storable fuels.


    The launch command goes in at 10 sec and the fuels start to mix with the nitric acid. This is an explosive combination, so the engines start to fire at once, making a dull thud. As they do so, orange-brown smoke begins to rush out of the flame trench, the Proton sitting there amidst two powerful currents of vapour pouring out from either side.

    As the smoke billows out, Proton is airborne, with debris and stones from the launch area flying out in all directions.


    Twelve seconds into the mission, Proton rolls over in its climb to point in the right direction.

    A minute into the mission Proton goes through the sound barrier.

    Vibration is now at its greatest, as are the G forces, 4 G.

    The second-stage engines begin to light at 120 sec, just as the first-stage engines are completing their burn. Proton is now 50 km high, the first stage falls away and there is an onion ring wisp of cloud as the new stage takes over. Proton is now lost to sight and those lucky enough to see the launch go back indoors to keep warm.


    Then, 334 sec into the mission, small thrusters fire the second stage downward so that the third stage can begin its work. It completes its work at 584 sec and the rocket is now in orbit.


    Once in orbit, the precise angle for translunar injection is recalculated by the instrumentation system on block D. The engine of block D is fired 80 min later over the Atlantic Ocean as it passes over a Soviet tracking ship.


    The cosmonauts experienced relatively gentle G forces, but in no time they soared high above Earth, seeing our planet and its blues and whites in a way that could never be imagined from the relative safety of low-Earth orbit.


    At this stage, with Zond safely on its way to the moon, Moscow Radio and Television announced the launching. Televised pictures were transmitted of the two cosmonauts in the cabin and they pointed their handheld camera out of the porthole to see the round Earth diminish in the distance. The spaceship was not called Zond but Akademik Sergei Korolev, dedicating the mission to the memory of the great designer.


    Day 2 of the mission was dominated by the mid-course correction, done automatically, but the cosmonauts checked that the system appeared to be working properly. Although the Earth was ever more receding into the distance, the cosmonauts saw little of the moon as they approached, only the thin sliver of its western edge. Korolev's dish would be pointed at Earth for most of the mission in any case.


    At the end of day 3 Korolev fell into the gravity well of the moon, gradually picking up speed as it approached the swing-by, although this was little evident in the cabin itself.

    Then, at the appointed moment, Zond dipped under the southwestern limb of the moon. At that very moment, the communications link with ground control in Yevpatoria were lost, blocked by the moon.


    The spaceship was silent now, apart from the hum of the airconditioning. For the next 45 min, the entire face of the moon's farside filled their portholes, passing by only 1,200 km below. The commander kept a firm lock on the moon, while the flight engineer taking pictures of the farside peaks, jumbled highlands and craters, for the farside of the moon has few seas or mare. As they soared around the farside, the cosmonauts were conscious of coming around the limb of the moon.

    The black of the sky filled their view above as the moon receded below. As they rounded the moon, they had seen a nearly full round Earth coming over the horizon.


    The Akademik Sergei Korolev would reestablish radio contact with Yevpatoria. This was one of the great moments of the mission, for the cosmonauts would now describe everything that they saw below and presently behind them and as soon as possible beam down television as well as radio. Their excited comments were later replayed time and time again.


    A mid-course correction would be the main feature at the end of day 4. The atmosphere was relaxed, after the excitement of the previous day, but in the background was the awareness that the most dangerous manoeuvre of the mission lay ahead. The course home was checked time and time again, with a final adjust-ment made 90,000 km out, done by the crew if the automatic system failed. The southern hemisphere grew and grew in Korolev's window. Contact with the ground stations in Russia was lost, though attempts were made to retain communications through ships at sea.


    The two cosmonauts soon perceived Korolev to be picking up speed. Strapping themselves in their cabin, they dropped the service module and their own high-gain antenna and then tilt the heat-shield of their acorn-shaped cabin at the correct angle in the direction of flight.

    This was a manoeuvre they had practised a hundred times or more. Now they felt the gravity forces again, for the first time in six days, as Zond burrowed into the atmosphere.


    After a little while, they sensed the cushion of air building under Zond and the spacecraft rose again. The G loads lightened and weightlessness briefly returned as the cabin swung around half the world in darkness on its long, fast, skimming trajectory. Then the G forces returned as Korolev dived in a second occasion. This time the G forces grew and grew and the cabin began to glow outside the window as it went through the flames of reentry, 'like being on the inside of a blowtorch' as Nikolai Rukhavishnikov later described reentry.


    Eventually, after all the bumps, there was a thump as the parachute came out, a heave upward as the canopy caught the air and a gentle, swinging descent. As the cabin reached the flat steppe of Kazakhstan, retrorockets fired for a second underneath to cushion the landing. On some landings the cabin comes down upright, on others it would roll over.


    Hopefully, the helicopter ground crews were soon on hand to pull the cosmonauts out. The charred, still hot Akademik Sergei Korolev was to be examined, inspected, checked and brought to a suitable, prominent place of reverence in a museum to be admired for all eternity."

    (end of Harvey description)

    Stop daydreaming, Alexey– Leonov told himself.

    He tried to concentrate on the letter he would send to the Soviet leadership, a letter that would decide, or not, if he would be the first man around the Moon, ahead of the Apollo 8 crew.
    As luck would have it, the same launch window that might take Apollo 8 to the moon opened for America on 21st December but much earlier in the USSR - from 7th to 9th December. This was entirely due to the celestial mechanics of the optimum launching and landing opportunities.

    Leonov wrote (to no avail, unfortunately, as future would prove it)

    "I and Makarov are prepared, regardless of Zond 6's problems, to take the risk and ride their own Zond for seven days to the Moon and back. So is our backup crew, Valeri Bykovsky and Nikolai Rukavishnikov"

     
    Last edited:
    Apollo 8 - part 3 (NRO)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    Apollo 8 - time to start serious business

    Continuing with the alternate Apollo 8 and that mysterious ballast. You can try and guess what it is with a little google search :)
    Best is to come. It was an OTL program, yet it was straight out of a James Bond movie - although much, much better than Moonraker.

    Little spoiler: Moonraker will be evidently impacted ITTL. But this is a story for much later (1977 is a decade ahead, and there many, many things to happen before). :D


    NOTE: I try to avoid walls of text. I want the story to be easy to read, with space between paragraphs. It takes some times clearing the text after I paste it from my HD.

    December 23, 1968
    Public Affairs Officer

    "This is Apollo Control Houston, we estimate another 7 or 8 minutes before Apollo 8 Command and Service Module will separate from the S-IVB. We have not heard from the crew in the last few minutes, they're busy doing post TLI duties and we are looking at data here and everything we see is quite comforting. That is the next major event, separation from the booster, three hours and twenty minutes into a historical flight..."

    003:20:28 Collins:Roger. We have you about 30 seconds prior to separation, and everything's looking good.


    003:20:33 Borman:Roger. Call you again after separation, Houston.

    (onboard Apollo 8)

    003:20:39 Lovell :Okay, I'm coming up on 15 seconds to Sep.

    003:20:42 Borman:Alright.

    003:20:45 Lovell:10 seconds to go.

    003:20:48 Anders:You in Auto?

    003:20:50 Borman:Yes, Auto, Auto, right.

    003:20:52 Anders:Okay, at zero, turn Hand Controller counter-clockwise, plus-X, and hold.

    Jim Lovell occupied the left-hand seat and has access to the Translation Hand Controller. By turning the controller and pushing it forward, he fired the plus-X thrusters.

    When separation occurred the Apollo immediately began moving away from the S-IVB. After three seconds, the vehicles separated and Lovell continued firing forward for a further five seconds. A complex sequence of events now unfolded.
    A guillotine severed the electrical connections between Apollo and the S-IVB; then a train of explosive cords cut the metal structure joining Apollo to the conical adapter to allow the spacecraft to come free. The conical adapter was cut into four long sections which were now only joined to the S-IVB by spring loaded partial hinges at the centre of their lower edge. Pyrotechnic thrusters, mounted within the intact portion of the adapter, forced pistons to push on the outside edge of each four section, causing them to begin rotating away from the vehicle's centreline. With the panels rotated about 45°, the hinges disengaged, allowing the springs within the hinge assembly to push the panels away.


    003:21:00 Anders:3 seconds, Launch Vehicle Tank Pressure indicator, zero; CM/LV Sep; Translational Contr, Neutral; plus-X, Off; TVC Servo Power 1, Off.

    Sitting on top of the now peeled-off S-IVB, and revealed for the first time was the Secondary Payload, a passenger that replaced Grumman not-yet-ready Lunar Module.

    003:21:37 Lovell:There's one adapter panel.

    003:21:39 Anders:After this camera [garble].


    003:21:46 Borman:Man, where's the S-IVB? Anybody see it, now?

    003:21:49 Lovell:There it is!

    003:21:50 Borman:You found it?

    003:21:51 Lovell:Right in the middle. Right in the middle of my window. There's not a panel around.

    003:21:55 Borman:What a view!

    003:21:58 Collins:Looks pretty good, huh?

    003:21:58 Lovell:Give me the camera.

    003:21:59 Anders:Well, we've got some still pictures we can take...

    003:22:01 Lovell:Could you pitch a little more?

    003:22:02 Borman:Yes.

    003:22:03 Anders:We haven't got in here, yet.

    003:22:12 Anders:We've Separated Houston. We got the S-IVB and its payload, right in sight.

    003:22:16 Capcom Michael Collins: Roger, Apollo 8.

    Jim Lovell turned the camera toward the payload stuck to the S-IVB, puzzled. There should have been a ballast there, a big chunk of instrumented metal called the Lunar-Module Test Article, or LTA.

    With Grumman Lunar Module still months in the future NASA engineers would have had to fly the Saturn V with only the load of the Apollo on top.
    And they disliked that, for good reasons.


    By contrast with a near perfect maiden launch late 1967, Saturn V second flight, coincidentally set the very day Martin Luther King had been assassinated - April 4, 1968 - had been an utter disaster.

    The booster suffered violent vibrations in flight, nearly tearing itself apart, shaking over its whole length like a pogo stick, with disastrous results.

    Engines shut down with pieces of the booster skin falling apart; astronauts would certainly have been injured had the flight been manned.

    For a moment it looked as if the next Saturn V would have to be flown unmanned again. Marshall's position after that had been that the Saturn control system was extremely sensitive to payload weight; von Braun engineers feared any change in the established weights might bring the destructive pogo back.

    So further ballast was required to bring the payload's mass towards a figure that the launch vehicle's control system could handle. In simple English, a payload of seven tons had to fill the Lunar Module empty slot. Early on it had been as if a dumb chunk of metal could do the job, but soon George Low changed its mind, resulting in that payload stuck to the top of Apollo 8 S-IVB.

    Lovell hold on its camera: orders had been clear enough. Taking picture of the S-IVB payload was absolutely forbidden.
    Those National Reconnaissance Office paranoid officers. Lovell rolled his eyes.


    He called Borman and Anders to manoeuvre Apollo so that the big rocket body masked the payload; that way he could snap as much pictures he wanted. He had a last glance at the mysterious object they had carried so far away.

    The National Reconaissance Office military are really a bunch of paranoid jerks - do they fear a soviet spy hide between our couches ?


    The Apollo CSM turned around 180 degrees, docked with the mysterious payload and pull it free. After that they pressed on into lunar orbit...
     
    Last edited:
    Apollo 8 - part 4 (NRO)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    Introducing the classified National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) military agency

    Note: the NRO will play an important role in this TL. Its long running relationship with NASA is just amazing for such a secret military agency.

    The National Reconnaissance Office spends another 1 billion dollars yearly flying reconnaissance airplanes and lofting or exploiting the satellites that constantly circle the Earth and photograph ennemy terrain with incredible accuracy from 130 miles Up”

    Benjamin Welles, the New York Times – January 22, 1971
    (It was the first time ever that the NRO existence was mentionned publically... the black agency very existence was not publically revealed before the end of Cold War, in 1992 !)


    ...presumably through new real time spy satellites being developed that will transmit copious photographic and electronic data collected over the Soviet Union, China or other “targets” intantaneously to U.S Earth stations for fast analysis.
    Currently most U.S satellites spew forth data in packets which specially trained air crews recover in mid-air over the Pacific, then fly to Rochester for processing and Washington for analysis – a time consuming process”.
    (the same Benjamin Welles, in the Christian Science Monitor dated 23 April 1973. This time Welles had perfectly guessed the KH-11 that only flew in 1976 (!) ; and all the previous spy satellites the NRO was using at the time – Corona, Gambit and Hexagon !)


     
    Last edited:
    Apollo 8 - part 5 (NRO)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    NRO and Apollo

    December 26, 1968


    We are flying a manned lunar spysat. How about that, Jim Lovell thought.


    The Lunar Mapping and Survey System – LMSS - Apollo 8 carried on its “nose” had been a backup system in the case Lunar Orbiter didn't worked. In the end Lunar Orbiter worked well, so the LMSS had been cancelled in July 1967... only to be revived a year later for Apollo 8.

    Amazingly, Lunar Orbiter by itself had been a spy satellite - a failed one the National Reconnaissance Office handled over to NASA. Although a failure as a spy satellite, the Samos E-1 had done exessively well around the Moon.

    Because there was no astronauts to retrieve the film, Lunar Orbiter processed the argentic pictures into a scanner, turning them into into digital pictures beamed to Earth at the speed of light. That was called film readout, and somewhat ironically didn't worked at all in Earth orbit for the simple reason the sheer number of pictures just overwhelmed the system; there was no way of storing, scanning and beaming ten thousand high resolution pictures down to the ground based receiving system.

    The Moon however was a different matter, and there Samos E-1 worked well. Lunar Orbiter had been a highly successful program.

    After the crew doned their AL7 spacesuits Lovell had the Apollo Command Module depressurized. He opened the hatch and reached into the modified Gambit Orbiting Control Vehicle,an unpressurized, squat cylinder with a docking adapter on the front.

    In an ordinary, unmanned spy satellite there would be a Recovery Vehicle there, a large reentry capsule. At the front of the KH-7 was a 1 meter diameter mirror akin to a powerful space telescope. But that telescope didn't stared at the stars; instead it peered at the ground, essentially the Soviet Union or China. The system snapped very high resolution argentic pictures. Kilometers of film would then be stuffed into a reentry capsule; at the end of the mission the capsule would reenter the atmosphere above the Pacific and sprout a parachute.
    As it hanged below the parachute, a C-130 cargo aircraft would snap it, retrieve it and head toward Hawaii, where a Boeing 707 liner would carry the capsule to Rochester, New Jersey, home of the Kodak company. Once there, thousand of high resolution pictures of the Soviet Union would be handled over to the highly secretive National Reconnaissance Office – an agency which very existence was one of the most guarded secrets in the United States.

    Yet that deep black military space agency was collaborating with its exact opposite – NASA, a highly public agency. The NRO top brass must suffer severe stomach ulcers just thinking about it, Lovell smiled.

    The KH-7 Gambit was one hell of a system, straight out of a James Bond movie.

    With George Low a fan of James Bond, it is no surprise he reminded that system when planning Apollo 8 historical mission last August.


    It was rather amazing that the military ever allowed NASA use of such an advanced, highly classified system. But after all, hadn't Kennedy committed the country into a war effort so that a man landed on the Moon before the decade was out ? NASA had been given a blank check that included any resource useful for the lunar landing goal – and that went as far as borrowing the military most advanced imaging systems.

    When flying around the Moon a KH-7 obviously couldn't stuff the film into a recovery capsule to be send back to Earth. Instead Jim Lovell crawled into the spy satellite forward section and detached the film takeup reel—sealed to prevent accidental exposure. He pulled it back into the Command Module.


    The film takeup reel Lovell handled was a treasure trove. These pictures of the Moon had a resolution never seen before.

    According to a pre-flight briefing of the Apollo 8 crew, the KH-7 managed to image details of the USSR as small as 20 feet - looking through the thick Earth atmosphere from a height of 100 miles.

    Around the Moon was no atmosphere, so the Apollo with the spy satellite on its "nose" flew quite low, around 30 miles. Needless to say, resolution was even better than on Earth.

    Future Apollo landing sites had been imaged at an extremely high resolution, with boulder fields clearly visible on the frames.

    And it was only a beginning.
    Some more spy satellites had been "hijacked" by NASA; in fact four more systems were in storage, enough to image the whole Moon, although Lunar Orbiter had already done the job pretty well.

    An issue however was that the KH-7 Gambit was so heavy, a good 4500 pounds, that a Saturn V couldn't carry it together with a Lunar Module. The thing was too heavy; there was not enough room above the S-IVB to carry both vehicles on the same flight. It was either a lunar module or a lunar spy satellite.

    Apollo 8 had no such issue since it didn't carried a lunar module in the first place.


    The capabilities of the lunar spy satellite were just too good to be true.

    For example, a crash during an early Apollo landing mission could be investigated by an emergency manned lunar spysat mission. Apollo would fly as close as eight kilometers - five miles ! - above the Moon in such a forensic mission. Resolution at that altitude could be as sharp as 15 centimeters - 6 inches !

    The Apollo / Spysat combination could also be used for lunar remote sensing, or to scout for landing sites for Advanced Apollo missions.

    A global survey of the Moon from polar orbit was also possible.


    Although Apollo 8 had left its spy satellite crash into the lunar surface, future missions bore more exciting prospects.

    Simple modifications would allow the lunar spy satellite to hibernate in lunar orbit between missions. A more complex approach would have included a lunar spysat capable of continuing a lunar mapping mission after the Apollo crew had reloaded its film.

    Kodak had described how the spy satellite could be equipped with the Bimat film readout system that it had developed for Lunar Orbiter. Such an onboard processing and readout capacity would have allowed the astronauts to gauge the status of the KH-7 camera. After the crew reloaded the film reel and departed the lunar spy satellite would have carried an unmanned survey mission.

    After they resealed the hatch and repressurized the Command Module Borman, Lovell and Anders undocked from the spy satellite and fired Apollo big SPS to return home.

    The abandonned spysat would soon crash onto the lunar surface.

    (picture from The Space Review article that inspired this entry, here
    - Picture by Giuseppe de Chiara)

    2596d.jpg
     
    Last edited:
    NASA future (1) : the Townes report (1969)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    1969-1971: a transition era

    As the title says. My main POD is set in 1971, so there are two years that are more or less OTL.
    I filled that void with some cool stuff I red and liked. Maybe a little too much on too many different subjects - I might cut some things that are too big.
    Hope you'll be appreciate it.


    -------

    The remarkable success of the Apollo 8 mission has provided renewed insight to the dramatic public appeal of manned space flight and bolsters our confidence that the manned lunar landing may be accomplished as early as July 1969.

    With this convincing demonstration of our strength and capability in space technology we must examine and redefine the future role and objectives of manned space activity in our national space program. A decision regarding this role may be the most critical choice facing the new administration in regard to the space program.
    (…)

    What are the program items and their urgency for the immediate future ?

    Through the Apollo program NASA manned space program is currently centered on the Moon. A crucial question is whether it should stay focused on our satellite or reach for different destinations - Mars or Earth orbit ?

    Various items need special consideration. They are a manned space station, the Apollo application program, further manned lunar exploration, manned interplanetary trips, and lowering the costs of transportation to low Earth orbit.

    1 - Planetary exploration
    The US. program for planetary exploration by instrumented, unmanned probes needs to be strengthened and funds for such probes increased appreciably. However, the great majority of the task force is not in favour of a commitment at present to a manned planetary lander or orbiter, to Venus, Mars or elsewhere.

    2 - Lunar exploration
    After the first Apollo landing it will be exciting and valuable. But additional work needs to be initiated this year to provide for its full exploitation by means of an adequate mobility and extended stay on the lunar surface.

    3 - Space station
    We are against any present commitment to the construction of a large space station, but believe study of the possible purposes and design of such a station should be continued. We believe the Apollo Applications Program should proceed instead, as a way of testing man's role in space, of allowing a healthy continuing manned space program, and for the biomedical and scientific information it will yield.

    4 - Space Shuttle
    The unit costs of boosting payloads into space can be substantially reduced, but this requires an increased number of flights, or such an increase coupled with an expensive development program. We do not recommend initiation of such a development, but study of the technical possibilities and rewards. Some cost reductions in the space program can probably be made simply through experience and stabilization of the level of effort, and through coordination of future NASA and DOD programs.

    IN CONCLUSION


    We believe that the primary goal of manned space flight in the 1970’s which should be planned now is the scientific exploration of the moon, by both equipment and occasional manned landings using upgraded versions of the present Apollo system.

    Alternatives for this choice are a commitment next year to a manned landing on Mars, which some of us believe could be carried out in the early or middle 1980’s, if sufficient effort were made;
    or an earth orbital space station to house perhaps six to nine men who would make occasional trips to and from earth.

    A great majority of the task force opposes a commitment to a manned Mars landing at this time. We believe that the space program in this second decade should not be built around a single monolithic goal on a fixed timetable.

    The task force also recognizes that a Mars landing in the early or middle 1980’s would require a substantial expansion of the NASA budget in the next few years.

    We also proposes that the space station receive further study without a binding commitment until its design and purposes are more clearly delineated and the possibilities of a radical reduction in the future of costs of transportation to orbit are more firmly established.

    It appears that the AAP program for manned flight, also scheduled for the 70’s might serve many of the purposes of a space station.


    - Charles H. Townes.

    Source: REPORT ON PRESIDENT NIXON TRANSITION TEAM ON SPACE
    Date: January 8, 1969

    In November 1968 newly elected President Nixon had created a transition team to handle smoothly Johnson succession in the White House.

    These team would present reports before mid-January 1969 and Nixon official entry in the White House.

    Among varied advisory groups was a space team that was led by Charles H. Townes.

    Townes, much like many others, had been impressed by Apollo 8 outrageous success in the mind of American people.

    That success could be summarized by two pictures.

    The first was obviously Earth beautiful blue orb standing above the greyish, desolated lunar horizon.

    The other picture was much least known; it remained classified – with NASA complaining that retaining that information hurted its transparency as a civilian space agency. The NRO top brass was somewhat embarrassed since their system had worked even better than anticipated and garnered some unwelcome publicity in the process.

    The picture showed the Tycho crater. Thanks to its extremely powerful KH-7 spy satellite Apollo 8 had imaged Tycho at a resolution never seen before.

    The level of detail was truly amazing.

    Near the rim of Tycho stood a squat, squarred artefact. It wasn't a black monolith as in2001; it was the Surveyor 7 probe, landed in 1967 and long dead on the lunar surface.

    Charles Townes had been impressed by the level of detail. He felt the very high resolution pictures allowed certification of more landing spots, including zones far out of Apollo equatorial landing strip – Tycho, obviously, perhaps the poles and the farside.
    In his mind, Apollo should continue exploring the Moon - Mars, the space shuttle or a space station being only distractions.

    townes.jpg


    Charles H. Townes, father of the laser and 1964 Nobel Prize for this invention.
    Also a good friend of NASA George Mueller - both worked at the Bell laboratories.
    Thanks to Mueller Townes become a strong advocate of manned spaceflight.
    Townes will play a significant role in this TL.

     
    Last edited:
    NASA future (2) - 1991
  • Archibald

    Banned
    This a little alternate history sci-fi I've found browsing Google newspapers (before the service was shut down in 2012).
    It's a little gem I'd liked very much.
    The author is Gordon Dickson, a least-known sci-fi writer
    It seems that Dickson covered the Apollo 14 launch in February 1971 and that was a life-changing experience for him. The result was this nice little piece of alt space history.
    Dickson also wrote a Mars story not unlike Stephen Baxter Voyage, except it was published two decades before, in the mid-70's.

    Enjoy !


    CAPE KENNEDY – Florida - February 5, 1991

    Today, looking back 20 years on the flight of the Apollo 14 spacecraft with astronauts Alan Shepard, Stuart Roosa and Edgar Mitchell, it is easier to understand the public confusion about the space program which seemed to threaten to make this flight one of the last of the United States manned research programs into space.

    If Apollo 14 had turned out to be one of the last such flights it is hard to see how the present firm balance of power in the world could have been achieved so quickly and harder yet to guess how our social and economic ills could be so far along the road to being cured as they are.

    Almost certainly with the closing down of the space program that was advocated by some people in the early 1970s the space research programs of the Russians, the Chinese and Europe would have forged ahead. Other countries would have gained an advantage of information from basic scientific research too large for this country to overcome.

    The result could have been a lagging of US technology, a loss of profits from international trade and a sharp devaluation of the dollar. Inflation, poverty and resultant trouble would have intensified those very ills that opponents of the space program dreamed of mending by diverting funds from it to the attacks even then beginning to be made on our social problems.

    Luckily, none of this was allowed to happen.

    It is easy nowadays in 1991 to forget how it was back then. The Apollo launch drew over a million watchers into Cape Kennedy, the largest attended launch in history. But in spite of the numbers of the watchers and their visible enthusiasm for the space program, many of them had much less understanding of the benefits of what they were observing than we do. In those pre-global communication days much necessary technical information had which to reach the general public swiftly and in interesting easily understood language.

    Like her immediate predecessor Apollo 14 carried a laser experiment as part of her experiment package. Yet probably not one person in a hundred watching the liftoff of the Saturn with its white capsule on top was aware that already even then the laser, that coherent beam of light we all make use of daily in 1991, had already become not only a practical weapon but an industrial tool of so many applications that it was to revolutionize not only manufacturing but the simple process of living.

    [It is no surprise than laser inventor Charles Townes – a man who in 1964 was rewarded by the Nobel Prize for that fantastic invention – is also a staunch supporter of the manned space program.] note: this is mine. The laser / Townes connection was too good to be lost.

    Full appreciation of what research like this could mean to problems outside the space program itself only began to be felt by the public with the recognition of the achievements of the research in electronics carried on by research stations later established in Earth orbit and on the Moon to take advantage of the natural hard vacuum of space.

    It was achievements like this that gave the US its later overwhelming superiority in electronics that led to the present new era in world trade and a standard of living for all our citizens that allows the least incomed of us more in the way of comfort and conveniences than the richest of us could dream of back in 1971.

    When we go away for four and five days weekends we assume that our household computer will oversee the mechanical housekeeping, shopping maintenance and even repair tasks to be carried on while we are gone. We do not ordinarily stop to think that we and the space-based electronic laboratories that designed such equipment owe it ultimately to experiments like that of the Apollo 14 astronauts with the suprathermal ion detector and cold cathode ion gauge for measuring ion flux density and charge in the lunar environment that was part of their experiment package.

    Similarly we do not think of the fact that the Apollos water consumption measurement test was one of the steps in bringing us a technology of lifesupport systems that enabled us to mend and control a planet-wide ecology that had been ravaged and allowed to fall into disarray.

    Of the $21.75 billion that had been spent up through the flight of Apollo 14 by the space program, fully three quarters, or more than $15 billion had been spent in basic research that was to help make possible cures for the very ills the program’s critics would have taken program funds to attack by more primitive 1971 methods. It was that these critics were wrong as much they suffered from a lack of information about the application of space program research to the very areas with which they themselves were concerned !

    Curiously it was Apollo 14 itself which marked the turning point. It was the greatest attendance over at a space launching, 1700 men and women at the press site, 7000 at the VIP site, and more than a million others watching in boats, on land, lined up elbow to elbow along causeways and beaches to observe the massive white tower spurt orange flames the distance of its own height along the ground then lift brilliantly from the pad and vanish into the cloud cover.

    After the launch the word began to spread. No one knew how. Word about the real values of man’s reaching into the hard vacuum of space for new laboratory tools to carve out the answers to problems that had already threatened to grow too big to be solved on earth itself.
    That was the word that spread: and with it information of what the work of the astronauts and others meant or promised. So that today in 1991 we are not only all well-fed, housed and finally at peace with each other, but also face to face with the greatest future ever envisioned by man…”
     
    Last edited:
    NASA future (3): the Space Task Group
  • Archibald

    Banned
    here we go again

    "It is necessary for me to have in the near future a definitive recommendation on the direction which the US space program should take in the post-Apollo period.

    I, therefore, ask the Secretary of Defense, the Acting Administrator of NASA, and the Science Advisor each to develop proposed plans and to meet together as a Space Task Group, with the Vice President in the chair, to prepare for me a coordinated program and budget proposal.

    In developing your proposed plans, you may wish to seek advice from the scientific, engineering, and industrial communities, from Congress and the public.


    I would like to receive the coordinated proposal by September 1, 1969."

    (President Nixon to his science advisor Lee DuBridge, February 8 1969)


    ------

    In its deliberations, the Space Task Group considered a number of challenging new mission goals which were judged both technically feasible and achievable within a reasonable time, including establishment of a lunar orbit or surface base, a large 50-100 man earth-orbiting space base, and manned exploration of the planets.

    The Space Task Group believes that manned exploration of the planets is the most challenging and most comprehensive of the many long-range goals available to the Nation at this time, with manned exploration of Mars as the next step toward this goal.

    Manned planetary exploration would be a goal, not an immediate program commitment; it would constitute on understanding that within the context of a balanced space program, we will plan and move forward as a Nation towards the objective of a manned Mars landing before the end of this century.

    Mars is chosen because it is most earth-like, is in fairly close proximity to the Earth, and has the highest probability of supporting extraterrestrial life of all of the other planets in the solar system.

    We recommend

    1- that Apollo-type manned missions to continue exploration of the Moon should proceed.

    2- A Space Transportation System that will provide a major improvement over the present way of doing business in terms of cost and operational capability.
    Carry passengers, supplies, rocket fuel, other spacecraft, equipment, or additional rocket stages to and from orbit on a routine aircraft-like basis. We need the Space Shuttle.

    3- A chemically fueled reusable Space Tug or vehicle for moving men and equipment to different earth orbits. This some tug could also be used as a transfer vehicle between the lunar-orbit base and the lunar surface.

    4- A reusable nuclear space tug far transporting men, spacecraft and supplies between Earth orbit and lunar orbit and between low Earth orbit and geosynchronous orbit and for other space activities. The NERVA nuclear engine development program, presently underway and included in all of the options discussed later, provides the basis for this stage and represents a major advance in propulsion capability.

    5- A space station module that would be the basic element of future manned activities in Earth orbit, of continued manned exploration of the Moon, and of manned expeditions to the planets.
    The space station will be a permanent structure, operating continuously to support 6-12 occupants who could be replaced at regular intervals. Initially, the space station would be in a low altitude, inclined orbit; later stations would be established in polar and synchronous orbits.
    The same space station module would also provide a permanent manned station in lunar orbit from which expeditions could be sent to the surface.
    By joining together space station modules, a space base could be created. occupied by 50-100 men, this base would be a laboratory in space where a broad range of physical and biological experiments would be performed.


    Source : REPORT FROM THE SPACE TASK GROUP TO PRESIDENT NIXON
    September 15, 1969
    So here we are - Nixon decision.

    As you can see Townes transition team recommandation clashes head-on with the Space Task Group own vision.

    Had Nixon listened to Townes (January 8, 1969) and not created the Space Task Group a month later, Apollo may very well have continued past 1972. The last three missions had not been canned, and Saturn V production line was stopped but not dismantled yet. In short: Apollo wasn't dead yet. This, by itself, would make for an interesting space TL. (I tried it once, but the current TL pumps all my energy since seven years. Brovane Journeys of the Saturn somewhat fills that void, although with a different, earlier POD)

    The Space Task Group was a train wreck. They just asked for everything, and a $10 billion budget a year to do it - Mars in 1982 or 1986. Paine and Agnew were naive idiots.
    Michel Van picture is worth a long talk

    14516511683_2259d684fa_b.jpg


    P.S Michel, who is the last guy on the right ? From right to left : Nixon, Agnew and Paine.

     
    Last edited:
    Soviets in space (2)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    Here come the Soviet space program...

    April 2, 1969

    Baikonur, Kazakhstan


    It rained hydrazine and nitrogen tetraoxide; a deadly, corrosive and toxic rain. The 2M unmanned Mars landers and orbiters had been blown to bits, or even dust. Two hundredths of a second after launch, one of the Proton's first stage engines carrying them had caught fire and exploded.

    The robust rocket just shrugged and continued to fly. When twenty-five seconds later destruction and gravity prevailed, the doomed Proton pitched over and began to fly horizontally like some crazy missile.
    The eerie vision of a monster rocket flying in the wrong direction did last a mere fifteen seconds, after what the unfortunate Proton impacted the planet about two miles from the launch pad. The huge explosion shook the ground for miles and was followed by a menacing mushroom cloud.
    And then disaster struck


    The wind blew the cloud in the wrong direction; toxic propellant was blown back across the launch complex ! A panic-stricken military launch comission ran for cover: the rain was acid, corrosive and extremely toxic. But there was nowhere to run, although by pure luck noone died.

    Once the dust (and toxic propellants) settled, the scale of the disaster apeared. The pad was undamaged, yet the nasty chemical compounds made it unusable, and there was no way of cleaning the mess. Unless, of course, mother nature rain washed the propellant away. But the rain did not came in time, and Mars was lost for 26 months; it would return only in 1971.

    With Proton grounded and its pad paralyzed, there would be no Soviet robots to the Moon and Mars for months. Proton was the second most powerful booster in the inventory behind the huge N-1 build to land men on the Moon. Unfortunately, the N-1 was no better than the Proton, reliability-wise. The first had blown in February in a truly huge explosion starting what would decidedly be a very bad year in Baikonur history. Although the Proton failure was nearly as bad, the worse was to come.


    July 3, 1969
    Baikonur, Kazakhstan

    Only seconds into its flight, the second N-1 lunar rocket lost all of its thirty engines and fell back on its launch pad like some furious asteroid.

    Three thousand tons of kerosene and liquid oxygen detonated into an immense blast which rocked the steppe as if a nuclear bomb had exploded. A white-hot fireball illuminated the barren landscape like a man-made sun. The launch gantry was simply vaporized, the blast melting it down to its foundations.

    Such was the scale of the fire that it draw attention of American intelligence satellites usually tasked with monitoring nuclear explosions elsewhere in Kazakhstan.

    Powerful shockwaves extended in every direction; walls of air as thick as concrete that instantly killed hundreds of birds and animals, busted windows and engineers eardrums and flattened everything standing for kilometers.

    Vasily Mishin mouth gapped as a shock wave nearly tipped a twenty ton bus parked nearby. They were eight kilometer away !

    It was a cataclysm of truly biblical scale, although no-one died. The lesson had been learned in blood. A decade earlier, after a technical glitch stage 2 of a ballistic missile had fired too early - with stage 1 still under it, and the whole rocket still on the launch pad ! The resulting colossal explosion had literally incinerated 150 people, famously vaporizing Marshall Nedeline that had had the unfortunate idea to sat near the launch pad on a wooden chair.

    That day of 1969, from a safe distance of eight kilometers N-1 chief engineer Vasily Mishin watched the disaster unfold desultorily. Gone was the very last chance to beat the Americans to the Moon. Apollo 8 round the Moon flight last december had already wiped out the circumlunar Zond; now last hopes of a landing were burning fiercely. Race to the Moon was lost.

    What would the future be ?

    If the damn N-1 could made working someday - that was a big if, considering today's fireworks - then there would be three directions.

    It could be Mars: just like that old movie Mishin had seen many times in his youth - Aelita.

    Or it might be a Moon base - making Mishin's mentor Serguey Korolev dreams real.

    Or they could build some giant space station down in earth orbit, an assembly of massive modules thrown by N-1s.

    Mishin did not knew.
    The soviet space program laid in shambles.
    He really missed Serguei Korolev.

    Since 1945 the soviet space program had been marred with epic rivalries. Two decades before Korolev had battled Yangel, then the two had been sidetracked by Khrushchev favourite rocket designer, Chelomey, obviously in disgrace since the fall of his mentor.

    Manipulating everybody were motorist Valentin Glushko and rocket minister Dmitryi Ustinov.

    Mishin had succeeded Korolev after his death, with Yangel quietly retiring from the shark pool. As for the survivors - Mishin and Chelomei, Ustinov and Glushko: both sides just hated each other, fighting teeth and nails, sometimes forging alliances that never lasted very long.

    The Soviet lunar program had been a mess. There were two manned lunar ships, Zond and the LOK. There was a manned lunar lander, the LK; an unmanned robot to bring samples back, Luna; and an unmanned rover, Lunokhod.

    Zond and the LOK were both sons of Soyuz, but they had nothing in common past that. Zond was a truncated Soyuz light enough to turn a loop around the Moon after a launch by a Proton – their most powerful rocket beside the N-1.

    When this rocket would be ready it would launch another, bigger Soyuz, the LOK, and the LK lunar lander. But that was years into the future, as demonstrated by today explosion.

    Zond was really a very limited program; unlike Apollo 8 they could not even enter lunar orbit. The Proton was just not powerful enough. Still, had a Zond flown manned around the Moon, say, in the fall of 1968, with or without orbit the Soviets could have claimed to be the first... near Earth satellite.

    Of course what ultimately mattered was to touch down on the surface, and there the Americans could not be beaten.

    At least the Soviet Union would have scored a symbolic victory !

    But Zond had decided otherwise. After a string of failures they had had a very successfull flight in September 1968; truth be told the Soviet Union had been the first in history to shoot living beings around the Moon... But the livings were merely tortoises and worms, a far cry from Frank Borman, Jim Lovell and David Anders.

    Still, the American trio could have been beaten to the Moon somewhere in October or November or even early in December; they had the launch windows for that, and very motivated astronauts like spacewalker Leonov.

    Fortunately they had had not tried it. The next two Zonds returned to their usual failures, which would have killed anyone onboard; and now Zond was good for nothing. Still, Lenin birthday was to be celebrated next April... perhaps they could shot a couple of cosmonaut around the Moon for the occasion. But sure enough, each Apollo landing made the Zond flybys more pathetic...

    Vasily Mishin sighed. It was killing him slowly.
     
    Last edited:
    Soviets in space (3)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    "Our country has an extensive space program, drawn up for many years. We are going our own way: we are moving consistently and purposedly.

    Soviet cosmonautics is solving problems of increasing complexity... Our way to the conquest of space is the way of solving vital, fundamental tasks, basic problems of science and technology ....

    Our science has approached the creation of long-term orbital stations and laboratories as the decisive means to an extensive conquest of space. Soviet science regards the creation of orbital stations with changeable crews as the main road for man into space. They can become cosmodromes in space, launching platforms for flights to other planets. Major scientific laboratories can be created for the study of space technology, biology, medicine, geophysics, astronomy, and astrophysics?"


    (Excerpt from a speech by Leonid Brezhnev, Moscow, October 22 1969)
     
    Last edited:
    NASA future (4) Mars ?
  • Archibald

    Banned
    dreaming of Mars on both sides of the Iron Curtain

    "As early as 1968 North American Rockwell already imagined what the flight test program of a Mars Excursion Module (MEM) should be !


    For a Mars shot in 1986, testing of the Mars Excursion Module should start circa 1981.

    A typical Orbital Flight Test - OFT - would happen in March 1982.

    The second vehicle to roll out of the production line, MEM-02 would be launched unmanned into earth orbit atop a powerful Saturn V. It would soak in space for 200 days, simulating a trip to Mars. After what an impulse from the ground would have the machine reenter Earth atmosphere for a landing at the White Sands space harbor, New Mexico.

    Further flight testing would follow.
    A mission would have another 200 days flight soak by MEM-03; near the end of the mission the ship would be joined by an Apollo for dockingand crew transfer.

    After a thorough checkout, MEM-03 would be abandonned in earth orbit with the crew returning earth aboard their Command Module. That mission would be rather reminiscent of Apollo 9, including on-orbit firings of the lander ascent and descent stages; much like the Lunar Module, MEM-03 would be unable to reenter Earth atmosphere.

    (Hello ! In Baxter Voyage this mission is flown by Ralf Gershon and Adam Bleeker in August 1984 - with mixed results)

    MEM-04 would fly a similar mission profile - minus the soak. After a ten days only mission an Apollo astronaut would remain aboard to pilot the lander to White Sands.
    In order to fly across the much thicker, denser Earth atmosphere MEM-02 and MEM-04 would feature a reinforced structure.
    It has also been suggested to fly another Mars Excursion Module down to the lunar surface.

    MEM-05 would be send to lunar orbit first, followed by a manned Command Module. The mission would then proceed much like the Apollo landings.

    It would be a rather complex mission, made even more difficult by the Moon total lack of atmosphere - making some of MEM-05 hardware, such as parachutes and heatshield, rather unuseful. Modifications should also be made to the ascent and descent stages fuel tanks.

    For all these flaws, the prospect of turning the expensive Mars lander into the successor of the Lunar Module is rather apealing.

    North American Rockwell cost estimations bring MEM development at $5 billion, stretched over the next fifteen years leading to a 1986 flight..."


    (excerpt from: Manned spaceflight future - communication by Wernher von Braun - August 8, 1968)

    ----------------------------------

    (as say above - this is Asif Siddiqi, not mine)

    One of the first Soviet-era science fiction novels was published in 1923. Authored by the well-known prose writer Aleksey N. Tolstoy, the novel was a narrative on the adventures of two Russian cosmonauts on the surface of Mars, a planet governed by a ruthless emperor.

    The novel, named Aelita after its main character, the "Queen of Mars," was later turned into a movie of the same name, and it eventually became a widely popular film that was part of the cultural vernacular of the 1920s.


    When the time came in 1969 to assign a cover name to the new Soviet Mars program, officials chose Aelita.


    The basic requirements for the 1969 mission were to carry out a Mars landing during a 630-day (or 1.7-year) mission, with thirty days spent orbiting Mars.

    A total of six cosmonauts would be aboard the ship: three of them would spend at least five days on the surface.

    The primary propulsion system on the Martian ship would be electric rocket engines using nuclear power sources for the main part of the journey and liquid-propellant rocket engines for operations near Mars Earth orbit, the MEK looked like a long needle.



    The 150-ton complex would be assembled in Earth orbit after two launches of a modified N-1 booster. The first rocket would carry two components: the Martian Orbital Complex (MOK) and the Martian Landing Complex (MPK).

    The second N-1 would carry a fully functioning low-thrust electric rocket engine powered by two nuclear reactors. Each reactor was installed on one extreme end of the complex and protected from other systems by a "shaded shield": the cone-shaped propellant tanks for the electric rocket engines would provide additional protection to the crew from radiation from the reactors, The actual propulsion nozzles would be placed between the shade and the tanks.


    The complex would also have an extensible telescopic thermionic radiator for the energy sources, which would have a node to allow for docking and undocking to the MOK and MPK.

    The MOK formed the main areas of living for the crew. From one end to the other, the complex had seven sequential sections: the instrument-aggregate compartment, the working compartment, the laboratory compartment, the biotechnology compartment, the living compartment, the "salon" compartment, and the orientation engine compartment.

    The MPK had an unfurlable aeroshell for aerodynamic braking into the Martian atmosphere. It was located behind the "shaded shield" of the main spacecraft.

    After separating from the main spacecraft complex in Martian orbit, it would discard its docking apparatus used for operations in Earth orbit and then use a liquid-propellant rocket engine to soft-land on the surface of the planet.

    The aeroshell encased a cylindrical "living compartment" linked to the main crew quarters via a hatch, as well as a two-stage ascent stage with a spherical cabin, the MEK also contained the main crew return apparatus for returning the crew to Earth.


    The capsule was essentially a larger version of the "headlight-shaped" Soyuz descent apparatus with a lift-to-drag ratio of about 0.45, sufficient to significantly reduce g-levels upon terrestrial reentry. The capsule had a base diameter of 4.35 meters and a height of 3.15 meters.



    The MOK and MPK would dock in Earth orbit with the electric rocket engine plus nuclear reactor payload. Docking would be followed by the ignition of the electric engines to begins a slow acceleration into ever larger spirals around Earth.

    After the complex cleared Earth's radiation belts, a Proton rocket would launch a 7K-LI Zond-type spacecraft into Earth orbit with a crew. The Blok D fourth stage would accelerate the Zond to meet with the MEK in high orbit.



    Having entered the MEK, the crew would verify the operation of all systems on the complex with the option of abandoning the vehicle if there were serious problems. After reaching transplanetary velocity, the MEK would "shoot" out of Earth orbit in a trajectory toward the Red Planet. The electric engines would shut down at this point and stay in "cold storage. ''


    Calculations at the time had allowed engineers to compute the cumulative dose of radiation during periods of high solar activity that doctors believed would be acceptable for interplanetary crews. Based on these data, the crew of the MEK would stay in the special radiation shelter, which was in the form of a passage in the main instrument-equipment bay of the ship.

    The workload of the cosmonauts during both the outbound and inbound trips would be reduced as much as possible by making operations almost fully automated.

    Computers would deliver information on the spacecraft systems' operation based on an algorithm producing three values: "normal," "not normal," and "failure." The crew would be able to carry out any in-flight repair of the ship's radio and electronic equipment, designed to be easily accessible in the form of replaceable units.



    The effects of long-term gravity on the crew was still a potential unknown in 1969, and one option engineers seriously considered was the use of artificial gravity by rotating individual portions of the giant spacecraft around its axis. Research later proved that such rotations would be harmful to the body because of the appearance of "Coriolis" acceleration that distorted the human perception of gravity.'


    The coast to Mars would take 150 days, after which the electric engines would start operating again to perform Mars orbit insertion. The MEK would take sixty-one days to brake into high orbit and a further twenty-four days to shift to low orbit.

    The crew would spend an additional week surveying possible landing sites for the MPK. Three of the six cosmonauts on board would then enter the lander and touch down on the surface.



    After about a weeklong mission on the surface, the ascent stage of the MPK would lift off and automatically rendezvous with the MOK. The crew would transfer from the former to the latter's living compartment, and the no-longer-needed lander would be discarded.



    A week later, the crewmembers would begin their return trip in the MOK--seventeen days to escape Mars and another sixty-six days to gather velocity to reach Earth.

    During passive flight, the spaceship would pass as close to the Sun as possible, flying between the orbits of Venus and Mercury to accrue more velocity.
    Another seventeen days of active engine firing would lead to a second passive phase. Three days before reaching Earth, the electric rocket engines would be switched on again.

    The crewmembers would separate from the main MEK spacecraft in their return apparatus and land by parachute back on Earth with the results of their scientific experiments and Martian soil samples.
     
    Last edited:
    NASA future (5)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    advancing through 1970

    March 1970

    Charles Townes was frustrated. The 1964 Nobel Prize for its invention of the laser, he had got interested in the manned space program through Georges Mueller, a fellow colleague at the Bell Laboratories – and later, a manager of the Apollo program.

    Early 1969, in the wake of Apollo 8 Townes had suggested the new President Richard Nixon to continue Apollo and nothing else - Mars, the shuttle and a space station being only distractions. He had not been heard and once Neil Armstrong had accomplished JFK goal, manned landings on the Moon had been cut one after another.

    It was a shame.

    Townes had fought teeth and nails against that, to no avail. Townes was the ldear of the Space Science Board, an advisory council set within the U.S.A National Academies. He was an outsider.

    The chairman of NASA Lunar Planetary Mission Board, John Findlay position was even more difficult. Unlike Townes Findlay was an insider to NASA, but it actually didn't helped a lot.

    Order of the day was cancellation of the last two manned lunar landings. For the scientists it was a hard pill to swallow. Every Apollo up to 14had essentially been a loss to science, as symbolized by the uncooperative Alan Shepard who just hated geology training. Serious science planning had started only with the fifth landing, that is, Apollo 15. Now if Apollo 18 and 19 were to be canned, that would left only twolandings before the program concluded. And none of the scientist astronauts was ready to fly !

    "It all boils down to fly - or not - lunar landings after the handful of Skylab earth orbit missions. We consider it can be done; Paine see things differently: a Skylab hiatus amid lunar landings will be unproductive, he says. So cutting lunar landings is the way to go, Paine says." John Findlay said.

    "Yet Harrison Schmitt is not ready. He was to fly on one of the cancelled missions ! And even worse than that" Findlay told Townes "our board is being cut on costs ground. So are our fellows at the Astronomy Missions Board. My friend from the National Academies" he declared fixing Charles Townes "be ready to face NASA alone. Next year we will be disbanded. They want to fold us into some big, rigid Advisory Council for an easier access to NASA administrator. I fear they want to control us closer. By the way we don't want to talk to the Administrator: we want to talk to a chief scientist within the damn agency."

    Findlay made a pause.

    "I know that, you, members of the Space Science Board, are frustrated by your inability to assess manned spaceflight because you are barred from access to the agency internal documents and planning. We had access to that, but are now disbanded. Who will drive manned spaceflight then ? the Space Task Group ? the Space Council ? Both failed miserably. We face terrific difficulties, as shown in the battle to save the last Apollo missions."

    "Our option I has Apollo 15 cut, 14, 16, 17, 18, and 19 all piled up about five months apart over the years 1971 to 1973 and then fly the Skylab A missions, which drastically accelerates the schedule. Accordingly Skylab A would also fly somewhat earlier. Paine, however, told us he can't accelerate the schedule like this; for budget reasons lunar landings have to be flown six months apart. So we created another option encompassing that point.

    "Our option II is essentially similar except the lunar landings are to be flown six months apart, the whole thing ending in 1974 or so.

    "Paine also rejected that option, saying Skylab can't be pushed too late because if a delay of seven or eight months in the launch was to occur, then it would require a high, non-productive expenditure to retain the Skylab teams beyond the scheduled launch date.

    "So as you can see, we can neither compress the five lunar landings schedule, nor move Skylab. Paine answer is to cut two more lunar landings; we instead imagined a drastic third option.

    "Our option III is to fly Apollo 14, 15 and 16, and 17 about six months apart; then, fly missions to the Skylab A space station in Earth orbit over a period of about 20 months, until 1974; then carry out Apollo missions 18 and 19 six months apart, which would end the lunar landings in the year 1975.

    "The long gap between Apollo 17 and 18 would permit lunar scientists to digest data from the previous missions and to design new experiments for the final pair. We noted, however, that the gap might also make Apollo 18 and 19 vulnerable to budget cuts. And the fact is, Paine not even bothered considering that option. Be prepared to lose two more Apollo landings." Findlay was appalled, and furious. So was Townes. What could they do ?


    ------------------------------



    April 29, 1970

    Lee Scherer, director of the Apollo Lunar Exploration Office

    To:

    Frank Culbertson, director of NASA Manned Space Flight Management Council

    In this brief document I'll present some options for post-Apollo future. Truth be told, two of them are probably impossible because of recent, and severe, cuts to NASA budget.

    I think it is important to review first what the Integrated Program Plan is – how it works.

    A lot of people are discussing NASA Integrated Program Plan (short: IPP). It has been presented to President Nixon and largely explained within the press. There is a rising controversy over the IPP – some see it as a bold plan to extend human presence as far as Mars. Others consider it a folly, citing the current political and social turmoil.

    So let's put the controversy aside and examine the IPP in detail.

    How will lunar missions proceed in the post-Apollo era, I.e after 1975 ?

    Current lunar missions up to Apollo 20 entail non reusable hardware. The IPP intends to improve lunar sorties to the point a lunar base may be build, probably in the late 80's. There's also, of course, the case for a manned Mars landing.

    Let's focuse on the IPP vehicles, notably for lunar missions.

    Today the three stage Saturn V boost the S-IVB, CSM and LM to Earth escape. The IPP scraps the CSM / LM combo and replace them with a brand new vehicle, the dual-use space tug / LM-B.

    The space tug is to operate mostly in Earth orbit. Although a tug weight matches the space shuttle payload of 50 000 pounds, it will never launch on its vehicle. Instead multiple space tugs will be orbited by a Saturn INT-21 – that is, a Saturn V without the S-IVB

    A space tug is perfectly able to deliver payload to Earth escape – to GEO, to the Moon or beyond – but there chemical propulsion clearly shows its limits.

    The space tug payload is pretty limited.

    Still the combination of a space tug with the space shuttle – used as propellant tanker – can perform a wide range of missions such as satellite retrieval and repair. It is also possible to stack two space tugs on top of each other for more demanding missions.

    The LM-B is nothing more than a space tug modified with landing legs for lunar surface sortie

    Unlike the Apollo systems the LM-B is reusable because it uses maximum energy propellants, that is, liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. Yet the LM-B overall mode of operation isn't that different from Apollo. The S-IVB is still there for the push out of Earth gravity well. So is the Saturn V as a whole, complete with its S-IC and S-II stages, although they would be uprated. This new breed of Saturn V could place no less than 100 000 pounds – 45 tons – in lunar orbit. That mean it could launch a pair of LM-B. One vehicle would land on the Moon, the other would be kept in lunar orbit for rescue

    As it will ramp up LM-B lunar surface missions, NASA would also start to build space bases everywhere – in low Earth orbit, in geosynchronous and lunar orbits.

    The main space station module would weight 50 000 pounds, so it could be lifted by a Saturn V in lunar orbit together with a 50 000 pounds LM-B.



    Space base doesn't mean space station only. It also entails a propellant depot. The LM-B returning from the Moon would fill their tanks at the depot and escape the Moon gravity well before braking to slow down into low Earth orbit, where the shuttle and first space station would await them.



    The space shuttle payload of 50 000 pounds exactly matches the LM-B propellant mass, so the shuttle would be flown as tanker to refuel the space tugs and LM-B.



    The LM-B is first and foremost a lunar surface vehicle. So this beg the question of a crew taxi to the lunar orbit space station. As a temporary stopgap the good old Apollo CSM would be used, with its crew of three.



    Both CSM and LM-B use vintage, three-stage, non recoverable Saturn V – so that phase of lunar exploration will remains expensive.



    The real, major breakthrough that will cut cost of Earth-Moon trips is the Reusable Nuclear Shuttle – RNS, developed through the NERVA program. The RNS essentially replace the S-IVB atop a Saturn V.



    When compared to the old S-IVB the RNS would be a great leap forward. The Nuclear Shuttle would transport to the lunar-orbit space station six astronauts and 90,000 pounds of cargo, or 100,000 pounds of cargo in unmanned mode. Most importantly, and unlike the S-IVB, it could return 10,000 pounds of cargo and six astronauts from the moon to the LEO space station.



    A noticeable fact is that once again Saturn V would survive. The two stage INT-21 variant would boost a partially fueled nuclear shuttle in Earth orbit. Further propellant would be ferried by space shuttles to fill the RNS tanks entirely.



    The LM-B would remain in service as the main lunar lander, except that it would now be boosted by the RNS and not a S-IVB.



    The space tug would also survive for all the small missions that wouldn't need the RNS outstanding performance.

    By contrast the plain old Apollo CSM would be withdrawn (just like the S-IVB) and replaced by a crew module bolted to the nuclear shuttle. That crew module would be identical to the space tug / LM-B crew accomodations.



    As for the Mars shot, it would use a cluster of RNS. Two lateral boosters would push the stack out of Earth gravity well before detaching, turning by 180 degree, and fire their engines to go back to low Earth orbit. More RNS would be used for Mars orbit injection and escape, and return to Earth orbit. Building the stack in low Earth orbit would take a huge number of shuttle flights, completed by rarer Saturn INT-21 rockets.



    For the record, in January 1970 the Marshall space flight center presented the contractors with an ambitious RNS traffic model calling for 157 Earth-moon flights between 1980 and 1990 by a fleet of 15 RNS vehicles, each toting 50 tons of cargo !



    Now I'll examine three more realistic options.



    The first scenario has Apollo program ending with Apollo 19 in 1975. I shall remember you that the last two Apollo missions are under review and may very well be cancelled. In this case Apollo would conclude with Apollo 17 late 1972.



    In this first scenario from 1977 onwards Apollo would be replaced by a host of new space systems I described above – the IPP.



    At first glance the IPP looks like a balanced program. There are, however, a host of issues with it.



    The nuclear shuttle and chemical tug would be developed after the space station and space shuttle, that is, after 1977 – perhaps in 1980. If we consider that Apollo ends late 1972, the resulting eight year gap is quite prohibitive.



    There is, however, a more serious issue with that scheme. Most of the hardware I described earlier – I mean the Earth to orbit shuttle, the chemical tug and the nuclear shuttle - would be reusable.



    There are two major issues with reusability.



    First, reusable hardware generally may be expensive to build, to use and to refurbish.

    Secondly, reusable space hardware is only justified through very high flight rates.



    I personally can't see any future lunar program large enough to support the costs of a fleet of reusable vehicles. Anyway, the nuclear shuttle by itself has its own safety issues.

    Instead I suggest another, cheaper option. Let's cut the nuclear shuttle, the lunar orbit station, the propellant depot and even the Earth orbit station.



    What's left ? The Earth to orbit shuttle together with the chemical tug.



    I think that, if a maximum effort is done on the shuttle and chemical tug, we might return to the Moon somewhat earlier and at a lower cost, perhaps in 1979.



    Of course the tug has to be carefully designed to exploit the shuttle capabilities and performance. In this scenario, two tugs take a crew to lunar orbit. A landing needs four tugs. With a pair of landings at the same site, a mini lunar base might be established as early as 1982.



    Finally, as the former director of the Lunar Orbiter program I'd suggest a third option - that NASA would pursue lunar exploration only with robotic vehicles.



    As with the other two scenarios, Apollo ends either in 1972 or 1975 – it doesn't really matters. Following Apollo are five big lunar robotic missions – lunar orbiters and lunar landers and long range rovers.

    NASA is currently building such a system for Mars - through the Viking program.



    So I'd ask, why not use Viking hardware for lunar missions ? A balanced lunar Viking program would cost $1.3 billion.



    I'll further describe a lunar Viking program in another document.



    Briefly, modifications to the Viking spacecraft include deletion of the bioshield, the aeroshell and the single parachute, and the addition of a single solid-propellant retro-rocket. This is to decelerate the lander to a suitable approach speed, from which the existing liquid-propellant rockets could take over and gently lower the spacecraft to the surface. Up to 1,000 pounds of scientific equipment could be put down in this way and a small automated roving vehicle could be accommodated as part of the lander's payload. The orbiter would remain in orbit around the Moon to survey both the near and far sides.



    In conclusion, I personally prefers option two, that, is a reusable chemical space tug with a reusable space shuttle. Even then, that option has a major caveat – beware of reusable space hardware cost, maintenance, and traffic rates.
     
    Last edited:
    Europe in space (1)
  • Archibald

    Banned
    ELDO and the space tug

    March 1971

    “…The present situation on post-Apollo is that Europe is studying the space tug as a possible European contribution, although this tug is recognised by most to suffer a fundamental drawback in that it will not provide any technology experience for the aircraft part of the industry, since it is essentially a space project.

    Moreover, its European role might well be severely inhibited by the increasing interest the US military are taking in their own development of such a tug.

    Scientific experiment modules, as part of the manned space station complex, have always seemed likely starters as projects of identifiable and integrated European activity and ESRO is pursuing with enthusiasm the possibility of such work being carried out.

    Certain European companies are also pursuing more directly via bi-lateral arrangements with US industry Mission Boardub-contract possibilities in the shuttle development programme…

    Europe already has a year-long affair with the space tug.

    It all started on 14 October 1969, just a few months after NASA’s Apollo programme had successfully landed men on the moon, the European Science Committee of Senior Officials was addressed by NASA Administrator Dr Thomas Paine.
    Paine sketched out the kind of programme that the new Nixon Administration had in mind for the next decade of space activities. The vision was grandiose and the means to achieve it ambitious.
    Paine made it clear on several occasions that the US would welcome European participation in this initiative. “We have in space”, he said, “a unique opportunity for a new step forward in international cooperation”.

    And as Europe defined its objectives in ELDO and ESRO, the US would “welcome your suggestions as to new means whereby we can achieve a greater degree of cooperation between our proposed space programs and your own plans for European programs”.

    The Committee of Alternates instructed ESRO and ELDO to study NASA’s proposal.A working group was set up with chairmen J.P. Causse and J. A. Dinkespiler.

    Their report was ready in April 1970.

    It reiterated the revolutionary nature of the programme proposed by Paine to which a new element had now been added, the space tug.
    The tug was a sort of Shuttle third stage, a (perhaps) manned vehicle intended to carry payloads beyond the Shuttle’s orbit, e.g. up to geostationary orbit.

    The report suggested that Europe’s needs would best be served if her industry was able to cooperate in developing elements which were crucial to the system as a whole and sufficiently individualised for the management to be fully in European hands.
    As for impact, it did not seem that Europe need adjust her scientific or application programmes to the new situation.

    Since the Shuttle won't be scheduled to be routinely operational until the mid-1980s the Causse/Dinkespiler report insisted that a launcher such as Europa III, if available in 1978, would have an active life of a decade.

    In any event they reported that Europe should only agree to participate in the entire effort if she was given firm guarantees that her missions would be launched.

    Their views were laid before the fourth meeting of the European Space Conference which opened in Brussels in July 1970.
    An interesting case was also made that, since the advanced cryogenic technology needed for Europa III could be used if Europe contributed the tug to the post-Apollo programme, one should go ahead with the initial work anyway.

    It would not be wasted even if Europe eventually decided not to develop its own launcher.
    Being a third shuttle stage or an orbiter payload, the tug is an autonomous system with a rather small number of interfaces with the two first stages, compared to other systems which are part of the booster or orbiter.

    These facts led the European Authorities in April 1970 to the decision to spend 5 Million dollar on a pre-phase-A-study for a European Space Tug.
    Among a number of leading teams, two were selected to conduct a 6 months pre-phase-A-tug system study starting on July 15 June, 1970.

    With the restriction on the use of LH2 and LOX as propellant combination, with an Isp equal to 450 sec and the shuttle performance of 22 t into 185 km altitude at 28.5° inclination and a payload volume of a 18 m long cylinder with a diameter of 4.5 m, the study made it clear that 6 t of payload could not be placed into geo-synchronous orbit launched by on shuttle flight with the tug returning to the orbiter orbit.

    The traffic model investigation, however, showed that about four times in 10 years a 6 t payload would have to be launched into geo-synchronous orbit, in which case an expendable tug was assumed to be permissible.

    In this case, the volume restriction in the orbiter payload bay would allow a payload density of about 50 kg/m3.

    Thus, as of today (March 1971), the first European ideas about a space tug are available and in a hurried process of 6 months about 20 European firms have been forced to deal with the problems of the Post Apollo shuttle program.

    This fact can be considered as the best possible preparation for a possible participation in the program with NASAIn the meantime a number of decisions have been made by NASA for the shuttle of which an important one was the orbiter payload increase due to the fact that, for the nominal version, airbreathing engines were abandoned.

    Furthermore, NASA decided to conduct no special technical tug study during the year 1971 besides the investigation of some economical questions and the use of existing upper stages of conventional launching vehicles for space tug tasks .

    These facts led ELDO to the decision to continue the pre-phase-A-tug studies for four months – up to May 1971 - in order to adjust the design concepts to the new shuttle performance. As this is the only special tug investigation at present, it was decided to extend the mission range to lunar and planetary missions also, i.e. including the possibility of manned missions.


    As this pre-phase-A-study is practically a continuation of the past activity, two study contracts were awarded to the two teams led by HSD and MBB. The total funding is 0.4 million dollar.

    Final results are expected at the end of July 1971.There is an 55 million dollar preparatory program for the EUROPA III launching vehicle under its way with an essential part of the cost being devoted to predevelopment work for the LH2/LOX upper stage of 20 t propellants - the H-20.

    In October 1970 a consortia with the name of Cryorocket has been created. There the French SEP works with MBB.

    As this stage is similar in size and nature to the tug so far no special technology activities were considered to be necessary.

    For the second part of this year however, ELDO intend to start a special tug technology program. In this program, these problems will be studied which are not covered under the EUROPA III work, i.e. rendez-vous radar and laser, docking mechanism and meteoroid protection.

    If the ESC/NASA cooperation is followed up, ELDO intention is to start a phase A tug study at about October/November 1971.
    For this study ELDO has begun together with NASA to discuss the task definition and to define the input documents with respect to interfaces, safety, operations and shuttle performance.

    Following this study it would be possible to enter into phase B during 1972 and to enter into phase C during 1973.
    This timescale would fit very well into the present shuttle schedule which assumes a first shuttle flight for April 1978 and an IOC for mid-1979.
    It would give Europe time enough for a development start on the tug as a contribution to the Post-Apollo program up to 1975 when DOD and NASA want to decide whether to select an existing upper stage as expendable tug as an interim solution or to go with their European partners right from the beginning.

    The described preparation in Europe shows that the problem has been seriously considered and that the project picks up speed in accordance with the shuttle project in the United States.

    9902041.jpg


     
    Last edited:
    Owen Gordon
  • Archibald

    Banned
    introducing a fictionnal character - Owen Gordon

    For the need of my story I sometimes created fictionnal peoples. Owen Gordon is one of them ;) He is a Canadian with a rich, if not tragic, backstory. He will be a recurrent figure in the TL.

    September 14, 1970

    Unfortunately for NASA Lee Scherer memo had been quite prescient.

    Six months later, in that fall of 1970, NASA administrator and sincere space enthusiast Tom Paine was leaving.

    Apollo missions were canned, and Mars was farther than ever.

    With the nuclear rocket program dying of a painful agony, all was left was a space shuttle to a space station – with the chemical tug in serious trouble.

    The aerospace industry badly suffered from post - Apollo hangover.


    Amid the chaos, Owen Gordon was working on Mcdonnell Douglas bid for the space shuttle.

    Owen Gordon was forty-nine, and he worked for McDonnell Douglas. Born in Canada, he had fought WWII in England, flying 118th Squadron Spitfires against the Luftwaffe along Howard “Cowboy” Blatchford.

    That he had survived the damn war had been a miracle. He was still paying the price, however; he still had nightmares, after all these years.

    That fateful day...

    May 3, 1943. Just another day in an horrible, never-ending war (this is a true story I red many years ago, and it shook me deeply. WWII bomber crews were BRAVE)

    “Today you will take part in a series of attacks designed to help the Dutch Resistance Movement and encourage Dutch workers in strikes then being organised in defiance of the Germans.

    No. 487's role will bomb the power-station at Amsterdam and, at the same time, create a diversion for another raid by Douglas Bostons a few minutes later on the power-station at Ijmuiden.”


    The New Zealand bomber crews of 487 Squadron assembled for briefing shortly after noon on a day of blue skies and warm sunshine – one of those late spring days when it was good to be alive in England - perfect flying weather and every prospect of a successful mission.

    There was no questions, nor any doubt expressed. The crews were just brave.
    A little farther on another airfield Owen Gordon rapidly walked around its Spitfire. The elegant nose pointed toward the sky, menacing, the gracious elliptical wings a marking contrast.

    The Spitfires from many squadrons joined the ramrod raid over Coltishall, now a powerful formation of fighters and bombers.


    They crossed the coast and Gordon felt adrenaline surge as he saw England disappearing.

    They were literally skimming the waves to avoid detection by German radars.

    No less than six squadrons of Spitfires had been committed to protect a handful of bombers. Crew from New Zealands were manning the bombers - Lockheed Venturas. Unfortunately the Ventura was a very bad bomber for the simple reason it had been build as submarine hunter, not daylight bomber.

    After long minutes they approached the Netherlands coast. And then all of sudden the sky filled with tailed-swastikas aircrafts.

    The Spitfires were outnumbered from the beginning.

    The hell ! How do they knew ? Gordon thought.

    And then he remembered.


    There had been two more squadrons of Spitfires flying ahead of the raid; the bastards had probably flown too high – maybe in the vain hope of catching the Luftwaffe per surprise ?

    Whatever, now the Bandits had been alerted.

    In his radio he could heard Blatchford trying to call the Venturas back, to no avail. Scores of Focke-Wulf 190, with 109s shooting the Venturas, filled the sky.

    The first pass disabled a Ventura out of the formation with both engine smoking. Undisturbed, the bombers just closed ranks to concentrate the fire of their unefficient defensive machine-guns and continued to the target.

    He couldn’t believe it, although he knew Howard Trent reputation. The New Zealander pilot leading the pack of Venturas, Trent was no coward. Gordon knew that under Trent leadership the bombers would press to the target whatever happened, even the worse.

    We can’t let them alone.

    He manoeuvred in protection of the bombers, and others Spitfires joined him, out of the inferno.

    For a fraction of second he could see a Focke-Wulf dive to the ground, trailing smoke.

    And they continued toward Amsterdam. Gordon had never seen so much Luftwaffe fighters. Even a Ventura scored, crippling a silly 109 with its nose machine guns.

    Then, with another 109 in his tail Gordon had to fight back and inevitably lost contact with the bombers.

    He managed to shot down its assaulter, then glanced at its fuel gauge, which level was alarmingly low.

    He was now alone in the hostile sky, and dived to the ground and security.

    As he crossed the coast back, he joined a formation of Spitfires on their way home. He was horrified to see no bombers with them.

    A call in the radio told him that Blatchford had been seen limping back. He briefly saw an aircraft impacting the sea. No parachute in sight, as far as he could tell.

    The first Canadian to score in WWII, Howard Blatchford, was dead.

    Gordon machine had been crippled in the fight, but was still airworthy. He limped back to the base.

    And still the Venturas wee nowhere to be seen.

    He had no clue of their fate until the next day. He was told that they had continued to the target without a fighter cover, the Venturas falling out of the sky one-by-one until, well, none was left.

    The whole raid and a whole squadron of bombers had just been wipped out.

    A single machine ultimately returned, the one he had seen, the first to be attacked. It meant that no bomber having make it to the target returned to told its story. And that included Howard Trent.

    He insisted to meet the lone survivor, and drove to the 487 squadron airfield. The lone damaged Ventura, crippled, battered, had been pushed aside. Around were the empty slots of those that would never return. The surviving pilot was devastated, most of its crew dead or badly hurt.

    Later he would learn that, unknown to the raid planners, the German defences had been reinforced because of high-level officials present in Amsterdam this day. Blatchford call to the Venturas had not been heard.

    The reason was that the bombers were too close from each others, the mass of their metallic frames obscuring the radio signal. The bombers had flown so close to each others to try to protect mutually by crossing their defensive fire.

    Considering the squadron ultimate fate, it made for an extremely bitter irony, typical of tragic war stories.


    I left them alone. I should have protected them at all cost. We send these crews to their death.[/FONT]​
    He had never forget.

    Not even three decades later.

    Not even after another trauma in his life - the abrupt end of Avro Canada and the Arrow project.

    The Arrow fiasco was only the tip of a much bigger iceberg. It was as if Gordon beloved native country could not decide whether it wanted to become an aerospace giant or not.

    They had all the resources; they had build superb machines, but too often the projects had been canned at the prototype stage, sometimes for the wrong reasons.

    Gordon remembered the passionate debate about whether his native country should build its own satellite launch vehicle or simply bought rides on American boosters.


    So far the question had remained unsettled - they had not even been able to decide whether or not to build Scout under licence, damn them. Poor John Chapman.


    "We do not consider that Canada should attempt at this time to provide satellite launch vehicles to meet all program needs."
    "What are these programs, Mr Chapman ?"
    "These fall into 2 categories, launchers for small (100-lb) scientific spacecraft, and for large (500- to 1000-lb) spacecraft in earth-synchronous orbits.
    The small scientific spacecraft consists of an indigenous remote sensing orbital platform known as the Canadian earth resources evaluation satellite.

    The satellite small size and weight might be satisfied with Gerald Bull HARP gun launcher, a vehicle formed of clustered Black Brant rockets, or we could build simply build American Scout rockets under licence."

    "Certainly we could do that; however development of a Canadian launcher of the Scout class is not an overly ambitious undertaking for a country which already is producing and launching multi-stage sounding rockets of the Black Brant type.

    The progression from sounding rockets to satellite launchers is fundamentally one of providing the necessary guidance and control to incline the flight path horizontally and insert a payload into orbit. The basic elements already exist of rocket motor technology, staging design and a launch and tracking complex at Churchill."

    "Fine, Mr Chapman, but, further degrading the Scout's applicability by that time is the fact that communications satellites are essentially the only type of satellite Canada plan to launch between 1969 and 1979.

    They are too large for the Scout to lift and require much greater and more stable insertion orbits than the small four-stage rocket can achieve.

    "Thus a much larger vehicle is needed to place a large spacecraft in synchronous orbit at 22,300-mile altitude - something of the order of the Atlas-Agena, a large liquid- fueled vehicle. And there, an indigenous development is out of question, for many reasons.

    Canada's need for these vehicles could most logically be met by buying rockets from those countries which have them if the numbers needed are small, or by manufacture in Canada, under licence if need be, for larger numbers. Such a course might be financially most reasonable, other things being equal.

    In our view, it will be necessary to purchase launches for communications satellites for at least the next decade. These will have to be obtained from one of the countries having these facilities, presumably either the US, or the European consortium ELDO. These will have to be obtained on the best financial and technical terms possible."

    lockheed-venturas-487-squadron-rnzaf.jpg


    New Zealand 487th squadron crew, 1943. Those guys were BRAVE.
     
    Last edited:
    Lifting body
  • Archibald

    Banned
    a little of the right stuff

    April 1971
    Edwards AFB , California

    Test pilot Story England considered himself altogether as the best pilot one has ever seen, a veteran, and sometimes a survivor, too.
    Although he loved flying fantastic machines – and Edwards was the best place in the world for the job – he had seen too much aircrafts fell from the sky over the years.

    Risky business, as they say.

    His heart pinched slightly.

    I don't know why, but I keep thinking something's bound to go wrong.

    He didn’t give a damn.

    Better than being in Vietnam, or driving a fucking airliner between two cities many times a day.

    This morning promised to be quite exciting and fun, if not risky.

    Story England had joined the Air Force just after the Korean War, and never regretted it. After some year spent flying interceptors for the Air Defence Command - North America watchdogs - he had geared his career toward flight testing.
    At at time when Sputnik scared the hell out of America the Air Force had great hopes that the next step - flying men into space - would fall under its aegis.
    Over the decade that followed the Air Force frantically attempted to place its pilots in space with a host of varied programs - Man In Space Soonest, DynaSoar, Blue Gemini, and the Manned Orbiting Laboratory.

    All were cancelled since role of a military men in space remained murky.

    Of all these broken arrows, England mostly regretted DynaSoar, a small space plane, the true ancestor of the space shuttle NASA wanted to build.

    Back in 1944 the Nazis wanted to bomb New York, 8000 km away from the Fatherland. None of their aircrafts, of course, could do the trip.

    And then come engineer Eugene Sanger, with a hare-brained concept.
    Sanger’s bomber would be rocket powered, and it would fly extremely fast and high, to the edge of space; and then it would skim over Earth atmosphere like a flat stone over water.
    Rebounding again and again on the upper atmosphere, a hundred kilometer high, the Silver Bird could fly to the antipodes, dropping nuclear bombs on the way - a truly terrifying weapon.

    The Air Force explored the concept in the early 50's, only to discover it would never work; the Silver Bird would have melted straight away.
    Dynamic Soaring:
    Dyna Soar.
    The name had stuck to the American Silver Bird.

    DynaSoar would fly suborbital hops atop a modified Titan missile.
    This made it the perfect successor to the X-15 that flew with great success. The year was 1958; in the wake of the Sputnik panic, a civilian space agency was created, and they took a different approach to men-in-space than the Air Force.


    Capsules, not spaceplanes, would fly men into orbit, at least initially. Early spaceplanes like the X-15A2 and DynaSoar would test hypersonic flight into suborbital hops; later they would reach orbit and replace capsules in their role of crew ferries to future space stations. And later those space stations would become spaceports for nuclear-powered space cruisers bound to the Moon and Mars.

    Such visions !

    Dynasoar flight test program promised to be a pilot dream: the thing would fly high and fast, a huge suborbital hop that would bring it as far as Brazil - to a landing at the Fortaleza airstrip !
    It would be the culmination of six decades of flight since the Wright brothers brief hop at Kill Devil Hills in 1903...

    Unfortunately from 1961 onwards Boeing and the Air Force made the mistake of turning DynaSoar into a capsule competitor. Together with that foolish McNamara, this rapidly doomed the program, until its final cancellation late 1963.

    England faced no other choice to remain at Edwards and fly the varied machines up there, most of them bleeding-edge technology.
    There were past prototypes of fighters that would never enter service for a host of reasons; monstrous titanium or steel machines flying at 2000 miles per hour, called Walkyries and Blackbirds; old bombers turned into motherships; the X-15 of course, that flew faster and faster, up to Mach 6.

    And, above all, were the Lifting Bodies, a new breed of flying machines, that build their lift, not from their wings but from their own stubby fuselage. M2F, X-24 or HL-10 - their had been varied machines flying over the years in the desert. Just like the incoming space shuttle, lifting bodies used to land unpowered, falling toward the landing strip like stones rather than birds, at a speed of two hundred miles per hour.

    I guess I should've kept my mouth shut when I started to brag about. But I can't back down now because I pushed the other guy too far...

    He thought about his fellow test pilot and colleague Milton Thompson. Of the things they had discussed days before, around some beers.

    The other day I received a call from the Martin Marietta company. One of their representative who had first contacted me about the SV-5J - a X-24 lifting body powered by a small jet engine borrowed from a business jet. This thing is all drag and lack power.”
    Probably very dangerous to fly then. Why on hell did they build that ?”
    Because Chuck Yeager told them we needed a jet-powered lifting body trainer. Well, maybe Yeager has the pilot skills to fly such thing, and probably you and I, too. But younger pilots don’t, and this might end in a bloodbath. Whatever, the fuckers from Martin didn’t give a damn; all they understood what that Yeager asked them two more X-24 hulls they immediately build on their own dime. Fortunately USAF refused the things, and they were stored, never flying. Unless of course they found some crazy pilot to risk his life making a hop in this infernal machine.”
    How interesting. And obviously they thought about you.”
    You have it right. And guess what ? the fucker asked me to quote a price to fly their coffin ! I told him I wasn't interested. He persisted, but I finally convinced him that I really wasn't interested. I suggested that he talk to one of the other lifting-body pilots. The next day, I got another call asking me to quote a price. I again indicated I was not interested. A day later, another call. By this time, I had decided to quote them a ridiculous price to get them off my back. I said that I would make the first flight for $25 000.”

    England laughed loud. “You bastard ! And did this strategy worked ?”

    Well, it actually didn’t. Instead I received, guess what ? an invitation from them; they wanted me into a simulator of them so that I understood flying the thing wouldn’t be so hard. For the sake of curiosity I went to their corporate offices in Denver. After I finished my simulator evaluation, I was escorted upstairs to meet the vice president responsible for this particular project ! He wanted my impression of the vehicle based on the results of my simulator evaluation. I was initially a little embarrassed about telling him what I really thought of the vehicle, but I finally began giving him my impressions and their implications.

    "Uh- Oh."

    "I told him that my major concern was the lack of adequate thrust to make a normal, safe takeoff. Depending on a quick gear retraction was not the way to guarantee a safe takeoff. I told him that even if I could do it safely, some of Yeager's students might not. An underpowered vehicle like that was a guaranteed killer.
    Martin could only ruin its own reputation by killing a couple of astronaut candidates. The X-24A might enhance Martin's reputation. The jet version would definitely degrade it. I concluded my evaluation of the SV-5J by strongly recommending that Martin not pursue the idea of flying it. And I’m quite sure they understood this time”

    They still don’t” England looked at Thompson, smirking.
    For a second Thompson couldn’t say anything.
    Oh no. Please. Don’t tell me you will do it ?” And then Thompson laughed. “Tell me frankly. How much did you asked them ?”
    You’re not as ambitious as I am. I’m the real businessman out here.” he boasted.
    How much ?” Thompson shouted, grasping England by the collar.
    well... a good $100 000.”

    Thompson was stunned, shut his mouth, and left the room. England was all triumph.
    Money, however, was not the main reason why he wanted to fly the fucking SV-5J. He had to know those beasts, because he might soon fly into space with them.

    Now all he had to do was to find a way to make Martin’s coffin airborne...

    ... the SV-5J stood at the edge of the runway, as rounded and thick as a French loaf. There was a fellow mecanician hanging around, England's trusted ally.

    "Hey, Stanley, ya got any Beeman's?" He smiled. An old tradition of them.

    "For unknown reason I was sure you would ask me that question." England caught the gum in mid-air and put it in his mouth.
    "You know I'll pay you back later hmm ?"

    He sat in the cramped cockpit, the canopy got closed over his head. Early in the morning the sun already bit his skin hard.
    Another reason to conclude this business rapidly. England had a brief, loving thought for that beauty, Janis.

    Don't worry baby, everything will turn out alright.

    He lighted the J-60 turbojet and started taxiing on the runway, until the mark which materialised the beginning of the run.
    He released the brakes and went at full throttle, and the lifting body responded without enthusiasm; the acceleration was pitiful, as he feared. The poor little turbojet in his back battled drag, lots of it.

    After a mile like that he started working on its controls to make the fucking thing airborne. Nothing happened, as if the wheels were stuck on invisible rails hidden below Roger dry lake surface.

    Okay, so you, fucking bucket of bolts, is reluctant to fly.

    He glanced at the runway; another painted mark went and vanished. He was right on schedule, right on the "flight" plan he had imagined.

    He counted seconds - 5, 4... at three, he eyed an object on the track - the board was present to the rendezvous. Zero ! he shouted, as the lifting body rear wheels bite the board, sending it flying over the lake. He pulled the controls as strong as he could and the lifting body literally jumped into the air.


    I told you you would fly, but you did not believed me.

    The nose, however, immediately started to sink.

    Uh-oh - looks like I won't retract the gear and have a ride over Edwards.

    He had enough, and landed the little bastard as soon as he could.

    After he stopped the exhausted turbojet a car settled near his cockpit and a guy - probably a corporate from Martin Marietta – ran in his direction, waving his arms, visibly agitated and angry. England took deep breathes in its open cockpit.

    Welcome back to Earth surface.

    "So that's what you call flying ? you bastard, you just jumped our thing into the air like a car taking a bump too fast. Say goodbye to your 100 000 dollars."

    What ?

    He literally jumped out of the cockpit, and walked toward the guy, menacing.

    "Who are you to learn me how to fly ? your paper-pushing cocksucker, you know no more about flying than how to order a drink from a stewardess !"

    Undaunted, the little man continued his rambling, although on a softer tone. England caught the guy by the collar and lifted him near his face.

    "I'd never specified a flight duration. A flight is a flight whether it is one hour or five seconds in duration. Okay ?" he released his grasp, and the guy fell to his ass in the mud.

    "Sounds... sounds okay to me." He retreated to his car, muttering obscenities. As the car vanished in the foreground, England laughed out loud, relieving the pressure that had tightened around his heart.

    Just another day at the office.

    Another car come out of nowhere. Stanley. Thrust an old buddy.

    5482.jpg


    Martin SV-5J

     
    Last edited:
    NASA future (6): station first or shuttle first ?
  • Archibald

    Banned
    1971 - NASA quandary: shuttle first or space station first ?

    If a space station is put into operation early and the space shuttle deferred, the logistics role would most probably fall on use of Apollo hardware. While the Apollo spacecraft can be extended to modest increases in its capabilities and cost effectiveness as an earth orbital logistics craft — through Command Module reuse, four-man crew, extended "quiescent" orbital stay time and other refinements it still presents a high-recurring "throw away" cost in boosters (Saturn IB or INT-20/21, Titan III-X) and Service Module's, driving recurring cost of station support operations rather high. If such use could be limited to 2 years or less, this is probably an acceptable program alternative.
    ---
    If the shuttle is developed and introduced first, the Earth orbital space station "gap" would be filled with extension of the AAP (Saturn V) workshop program. One such mission is now programed, a second in the planning stage, and a third could be required to maintain program continuity.
    The potential to use these AAP workshops to develop operational, maintenance and logistics concepts as well as some of the advanced hardware for the next generation space station program is excellent. It must be recognized however, that this is a fairly expensive gap filler and would tend to encroach on vital shuttle/space station R.&D. Dollars.”
    ----
    "The AAP / orbital / Saturn workshop may be very well christened Skylab, a name being derived from 'a laboratory in the sky', first proposed by Donald L. Steelman of the USAF, while working at NASA in 1968.

    Even then, however, Skylab is referred as the orbital or AAP workshop rather than a space station. NASA forged the alternate designation in order to distinguish Skylab from the real space station it hopes to launch into low-Earth orbit before the end of the 1970s. The distinction is paramount !
    Last year, during a meeting to discuss the feasibility of a large space station as a major post-Apollo effort, exactly two years after the loss of Apollo 1, George Mueller suggested that perhaps the proposed 'logistics system' should first be developed, before space station characteristics were decided upon.
    In short, it looks as if NASA may try to secure the budget for the Space Shuttle before funding of the space station it is designed to service !

    Meanwhile progress at least have been recorded with Skylab. So far three years of delays design changes, late decisions and cost cuts delayed the Marshall Orbital Workshop wet stage design. But the early success in man-rating the Saturn V on the third (Apollo 8) launch meant that one of the Saturn Vs could be used for an AAP mission earlier than previously expected.

    Incidentally Apollo 20 cancellation lprovided a Saturn V to get the first Skylab off the ground in July 1972 for three flights and eight months of manned operations.

    Looking forward however reveals uncertainty in spaceflight programmes after Skylab and it is difficult to visualise missions beyond 1972 to keep the programme sustained.
    Progress on the "true" Space Station will obviously rely on the success of the Skylab to provide essential data. In fact it may almost become a case of flying Skylab to prove that it could be done and then seeing what happens to the budget.
    As such, NASA top priority today is to fly one AAP workshop before asking for funds to support any follow-on programmes - be it the shuttle or the true space station. As if things were not complicated enough NASA also has to take into account the last manned lunar landings.

    Before its cancellation Apollo 20 was planned for July 1972, but lack of budget and Soviet failures led to a stretch of the flight schedule.

    With only two lunar landings per year Apollo 19 has been pushed as late as 1973 or even 1974. In summary, so much hardware has already been procured for Apollo that the landings may drag long enough to compete for funding with the shuttle, Skylab and the "true" space station !

    For example a scenario has the space station moved ahead to 1977 or 1978. The second Skylab or the first space shuttles would be flown after Apollo 19 in the 1974-75 era.

    Although Skylab is definitively not NASA dreamed space station, nothing would prevent a Shuttle docking to the workshop..."
    ---

    An interesting ideological dichotomy however separates the space station from the shuttle.
    For the shuttle, technology is clearly the driver, and paves the development in every respect. Advancements required in key propulsion, materials/structures, and thermal protection combined with painstaking attention to advanced hypersonic, supersonic, transonic and subsonic aerodynamics present a true technological challenge; but we consider this to be a challenge of credible extension of current art.

    These technological requirements establishes the shuttle to be the long lead system of the integrated plan and that system with perhaps the most uncertainty or risk in cost and schedule projections. If we are to have a reusable shuttle and are to realize the tremendous benefits it can bring to an era of "routinized" operations in space, we must press forward on this program with maximum urgency.

    (Merely to pursue technologies in a puristic sense will not materially advance us toward our goal, since as we discussed earlier, the driver on the shuttle is the shuttle configuration itself, represented in reality only by something closely approaching the full-scale aerodynamic/structural vehicle itself, in near-optimum integration to validate its performance capabilities and thereby its value …)

    The space station, on the other hand, is much farther from absolute or from a "go-no go" solution in form. It can be stated that instead of technology it is the Initial Operating Capability (IOC) that sets the technology cutoff date and thereby drives the configuration. To illustrate, a station of considerable sophistication meeting most of the program criteria currently set down by the NASA could be realized as early as 1975 with minor extension of Apollo/ AAP technology.

    If one more round of technology extension were undertaken to materially advance the art in key subsystems (such as ECLSS or electrical power) to a next logical plateau, 2 more years should be provided before a desired IOC (1977-78)

    If true and complete modularization and standardization of all subsystems, including structural vehicle and configuration, were established as a constraint to permit universality in low or high inclination earth orbit, and lunar orbit, 3 to 5 years additional should be provided to IOC (1978-80).
    If universality were to be extended to the Mars excursion module, 4 to 6 years should be added ( 1979-81 ).
    ---
    If the shuttle is developed and introduced first, the earth orbital space station "gap" would be filled with extension of the AAP (Saturn V) workshop program.

    One such mission is now programed, a second in the planning stage, and a third could be required to maintain program continuity.

    The potential to use these AAP workshops to develop operational, maintenance and logistics concepts as well as some of the advanced hardware for the next generation space station program is excellent. It must be recognized however, that this is a fairly expensive gap filler and would tend to encroach on vital shuttle/space station K.&D. Dollars.”

    (Excerpt from: Manned Space Flight: Present and Future: Hearings before the House Committee on Science and Astronautics, Feb 12 1971)
     
    Top