Across the high frontier: a Big Gemini space TL

Mars (2)

Archibald

Banned
August 9 1982


Vienna


Since the beginning of the space age, triggered by the launch of Sputnik I in 1957, the United Nations has accorded significant importance to the promotion of greater international collaboration in outer space. The potentials of space technology for socioeconomic development were immense and that the best way to reap these benefits were through international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space, facilitated by the United Nations. Recognising this immense potential of space technology for socioeconomic development, the United Nations organized three unique global Conferences on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space - UNISPACE Conferences - to engage States and international organizations to further their cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space.UNISPACE Conferences provided a platform for a global dialogue on key issues related to space exploration and exploitation that have yielded tremendous scientific as well as economic and societal benefits for humankind.

UNISPACE I, held from 14 to 27 August 1968, was the first in a series of three global UN conferences on outer space, which focused on raising awareness of the vast potential of space benefits for all humankind. The Conference reviewed the progress in space science, technology and applications and called for increased international cooperation, with particular regard to the benefit of developing nations. The Conference also recommended the creation of the post of Expert on Space Applications within UNOOSA, which in turn led to the creation, in 1971, of the UNOOSA Programme on Space Applications.

...

"The first-ever United Nations space mission will launch in 1986 allowing United Nations Member States to participate in a 14-day flight to low-Earth orbit on Lockheed’s Agena spacecraft, the United Nations Office of Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) announced at the International Astronautical Congress today.

The dedicated DIAGONAL mission, the first-ever space mission for the United Nations, will be targeted at providing developing countries the opportunity to develop and fly microgravity payloads for an extended duration in orbit; however, all United Nations Member States will be able to propose payloads for the mission.

The announcement builds on the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed in June 1981 between UNOOSA and Lockheed to collaborate on this historic United Nations space mission. “One of UNOOSA’s core responsibilities is to promote international cooperation in the peaceful use of outer space, I am proud to say that one of the ways UNOOSA will achieve this, in cooperation with our partner Lockheed, is by dedicating an entire microgravity mission to United Nations Member States, many of which do not have the infrastructure or financial backing to have a standalone space program.”

Lockheed’s owner and president stressed that the company goal is “to pay it forward. That means leveraging the creation and success of our Agena space tug to benefit future generations of innovators like us all around the world.”

Funding of the mission will come from multiple sources. “We will continue to work closely with Lockheed to define the parameters of this mission which, in turn, will provide United Nations Member States with the ability to access space in a cost-effective and collaborative manner within a few short years. The possibilities are endless.”

Countries selected to provide mission payloads will be asked to pay a pro-rated portion of the mission cost, based on the resources required to host the payload and their ability to pay. In addition, major sponsors are being sought to finance a large portion of the mission costs.

Over the next year, mission partners will conduct briefings to United Nations Member States and potential payload providers about the goals and framework of the mission and to solicit proposals for payloads. To make the program more accessible to nations without a highly developed space industry, UNOOSA will offer technical support to countries that lack expertise or experience in developing microgravity payloads. Payloads will be selected to allow time for development and integration into the Agena spacecraft for launch expected in 1986.

...

UNISPACE II was held from 9 to 21 August 1982, attended by 94 Member States and 45 intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.

...

Without doubt, the "US Night" at Vienna Opera House was already memorable and quite unparalleled, featuring the writer James Michener (Space) and and three astronauts. The evening culminated with an address to the conference by President Reagan on a very large screen.

In an alternate reality, the second UNISPACE conference held that day of August, 1982, might have seen men walking on Mars. Maybe NASA communications with the crew would have been relayed from Mars to Houston, then to Vienna; or, more likely, the conference would have been overshadowed by the greatest event in History.

A day of August, fourteen years before : as Soviet tanks crushed a revolt in Prague, not that far way in Vienna the first UNISPACE meeting was held in presence of James Webb and George Mueller. Down in Houston, Texas, George Low was forming the idea of sending Apollo 8 around the Moon.

Another day of August, a year later.

August 4, 1969

The day Werner von Braun gave a 30-minute Mars presentation to the Space Task Group.

“The plan you see is incremental; it spreads over twelve years and ultimately lead to Mars in the year 1982. It consists of five pieces of hardware, none of which – except the Mars Lander of course– is for Mars only.

These five elements are a) the Space Shuttle, b) a multi-role space habitat called the Mission Module c) the NERVA engine, d) a nuclear Earth-Moon shuttle and e) the Mars Excursion Module.

Here’s a tentative time line leading to Mars.

NERVA is funded first, in 1970. Then in the 1972-1977 era a robust low-earth orbit infrastructure is build, consisting of the space shuttle to a Mission Module space station. An Earth-Moon nuclear Shuttle is funded (1973) and tested (1977) pioneering manned nuclear space missions and expanding Apollo.

Note that, to this point, no commitment to Mars has been made - we have a space shuttle flying to a space station from which nuclear shuttles commute crews and cargo to the Moon.

Starting in 1974 development of the Mars Excursion Module would be the first and only commitment to Mars !

Flight tests of the shuttle and Mission Module start in 1975. In 1978, a reinforced Mars Excursion Module lands at Edwards after re-entering the Earth atmosphere. Mars sample probes based on MEM design are funded and tested in parallel, in 1979.

Then, on November 12, 1981, the voyage to Mars begins, departing Earth orbit during the minimum-energy Earth-Mars transfer opportunity. Each Mars mission employs two identical six-man spacecraft comprising at Earth departure three Nuclear Shuttles and a Mission Module. An unpressurised forward compartment houses the two-stage conical MEM, an airlock for spacewalks, six Mars Sample Return Probes, and two Venus probes. The compartment measures 33 feet in diameter while the MEM measures 30 feet across its bowl-shaped heat shield.

The four-deck Mission Module - derived from the space station - contains quarters for six people, but might support the entire 12-man expedition crew complement in an emergency. Measuring 22 feet in diameter and 110 feet long, it includes labs, the spacecraft control center, and a radiation shelter. A sterilized, isolated bio-lab for handling Mars surface samples is mounted below the Mission Module's lowermost deck.

A docking mechanism links the Mission Module to the front of the center Nuclear Shuttle. Two other Nuclear Shuttles are attached to the center Nuclear Shuttle's sides. Each measures 33 feet in diameter by 160 feet long. At Earth-orbit departure, the complete spacecraft measures 100 feet across the three Nuclear Shuttles and 270 feet long.

For economies the port and starboard Nuclear Shuttles for each spacecraft might be drawn from the fleet of Lunar Nuclear Shuttles. The Mission Module, center Nuclear Shuttle, and MEM, for their part, would be built new for each Mars spacecraft. All new hardware would reach assembly orbit on upgraded Saturn V rockets. Space Shuttles would launch water, food, some propellant, and astronauts to the Mars ships, themselves stacked at the space station.

At launch from Earth orbit, each Mars ship has a mass of 1.6 million pounds, of which 75% is liquid hydrogen propellant. The port and starboard Nuclear Shuttles fire first. Once Trans-Mars Injection achieved, they shut down, separate from the center Nuclear Shuttle and Mission Module, turn around, and fire their engines again to slow down and enter an elliptical Earth orbit. A few days later, they reach perigee at the original assembly orbit altitude, fire their engines to circularize their orbit, and rendezvous with the Space Station for refurbishment and reuse. The Mars ships would each mass 675,000 pounds after port and starboard Nuclear Shuttle separation.

The nine-month coast to Mars won’t be "by no means an idle phase" for the astronauts. The ships each serve as "a manned laboratory in space, free of the disturbing influences of the Earth. The fact that there will be two observation points, Earth and spacecraft, permits several possible experiments."

On August 9, 1982, the twin ships fire their NERVA engines to slow themselves so that Mars' gravity could capture them into an elliptical orbit about the planet. An elliptical orbit requires less propellant to enter and depart than a circular one. Spacecraft mass at Mars orbit insertion would be 650,000 pounds.

For two days the crews observe Mars to select landing sites for the expedition's 12 automated Mars Sample Return Probes. These would land, retrieve samples uncontaminated by human contact, and lift off to deliver the samples automatically to the sterilized bio-labs on the Mars ships for study. If the samples are find to contain no hazards, one of the expedition's twin 95,000-pound MEMs would descend to the surface carrying three astronauts.




Men land on Mars, August 12 1982 !




The astronauts would then spend from 30 to 60 days exploring Mars – seeking life, water and raw materials for future expeditions, and studying Martian geology before departing toward Earth late October.

On February 28, 1983, the expedition spacecraft will use fly past Venus to use its gravity to slow their approach to Earth. This detour trims the amount of propellant the ships need to slow down and capture into Earth orbit. During the Venus swingby, the astronauts use radar to map the planet's cloud-covered surface and deploy a total of four automated probes into its atmosphere.

Return to Earth would occur on August 14, 1983, with additional Mars expeditions in 1983-1984, 1986-1987, and 1988-1989. NASA might establish a 50-person Mars Base in 1989. Gentlemen, be sure that man's first step on Mars will be no less exciting than Neil Armstrong's first step on the moon."
 

Archibald

Banned
No such happy ending for LC-39 ITTL. Its fate will be.. different.

ITTL LC-39 is in limbo, with only Saturn leftover from Apollo lofting space station modules from time to time.
 
Last edited:
The VAB would make one hell of a museum...

A giant one for the Smithsonian Institution, if they can pay the maintenance cost for VAB.
They could put large Rocket vertical in to it like a Saturn IB on it „milkstool“ on Launch platform for Skylab
or hang large aircraft from ceiling, spectacular !
 
Soviets in space (23)

Archibald

Banned
(The following is an excerpt of an interview with Boris Chertok, 2001)

"What happened in the end to the N-1F launch vehicle?

"We feverishly hunted for payloads for it. And actually, very interesting prospective projects materialized, which could have led to new achievements in the field of fundamental astrophysics research, global communication systems, information systems development, and also monitoring in the interests of the national economy and national security.

We aimed to create a global communication system using a heavy universal space platform (UKP) with a mass of 18 tons, which only the N-1F rocket could insert into geostationary orbit.

The first spacecraft was inserted into GEO in the 1960s. Since that time, a total of 800 spacecraft have been inserted into GEO, and each year, on aver-age, 20 to 25 new ones are inserted. According to the latest data, more than 1,150 objects were in geostationary orbit. Among them were about 240 controlled spacecraft, while the remainder are spent upper stages and other items.

On average, the mass of the payload carried into near-Earth orbit by the launch vehicle makes up 3 to 4 percent of the launch mass of the vehicle. For geostationary orbit, the mass of the spacecraft makes up only 0.3 to 0.5 percent of the launch mass of the vehicle and the upper stage. Launching a spacecraft into GEO, as a rule, is done using a three-stage vehicle with the subsequent use of upper stages. Geostationary orbit, as the most advantageous location for placing satellite communications systems, will exhaust its resources in the next 20 years. Strict international competition is unavoidable.

One possible solution could be the creation in GEO of a heavy multipurpose platform. With coverage of nearly 1/3 of the surface of the planet, such a multipurpose platform will be able to replace dozens of modern communications satellites. The platform will require a high-capacity solar power plant. To support dozens of modern communica-tions satellites, the platform will require a capacity of 500 to 1,000 kilowatts. Large parabolic antennas or active phased arrays are capable of creating any given value of equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIIM) at Earth’s surface and receiving information from subscribers on Earth, using devices no larger than the best modern mobile phones.8 The capability of placing hundreds of relays for various ranges on a heavy geostationary platform makes it possible for the owners of such platforms to sell all types of communications trunks for any region on Earth. Heavy multipurpose platforms will be commercially advantageous and will facilitate the global information rapprochement of peoples.
Humankind needs the development and creation of such geostationary systems not in the distant future, but in the next 25 to 30 years.The problem of creating and operating heavy geostationary platforms can be quickly solved if there is cooperation between Russian and European technology. However, space stations in GEO can be used for military purposes, too, to suppress an aggressor in local conflicts and in situations such as “Star Wars.”

Hence in the early 1980s, Russia developed a real design for the world’s first heavy universal platform for GEO. . Insertion into orbit was slated for the N-1F launch vehicle, which had successfully passed its flight tests. Soon OKB-1, with the support of the Military-Industrial Commission of the USSR Council of Ministers, made proposals to Germany, France, and the European Space Agency regarding cooperation and joint work to create the universal heavy space platform in GEO.
In those years, only Russia, possessing the unique N-1F vehicle, could perform this task. The detailed development of the platform design and the technology for insertion were of great inter-est to the leading German and French corporations. Joint work was begun. However, the liberal market reforms of the 1990s destroyed the organization and deprived the N-1F vehicle’s manufacturers of any state support. After the loss of the launch vehicle, the proposal for work on the heavy space platform became pointless.
In 1984, as the new general designer of NPO Energiya, I, Boris Chertok attained consideration and approval of proposals for the UKP in the Defense Council. A draft decision of the USSR Council of Ministers appeared, which N. I. Ryzhkov was supposed to sign shortly. The ministry and Military-Industrial Commission declared that the work on the UKP ranked third in terms of importance after the N-1F and the MKBS-1 orbital station.

Almost at the same time as the UKP, OKB-1 and the Academy of Sciences were jointly developing the design of a space radio interferometer. The spacecraft, equipped with a uniquely precise parabolic antenna with a diameter of 25 meters, was to be inserted into elliptical orbits with an apogee of up to 150,000 kilometers. Only the N-1F rocket was capable of doing this.
Corresponding Member (now Academician) Nikolay Kardashev was responsible for the scientific part of the project. We flew to the Netherlands together. The European Space Research and Technology Center (ESTEC) is located there in the city of Noordwijk. In Noordwijk, and later in Paris, a special competitive commission declared that our radio interferometer would make it possible to study the finest structure of the universe right down to the “last boundaries of creation.” The universe was ready to reveal its secrets, but for this we needed to find approximately 1 billion dollars…. We didn’t find it. We even “teamed up” with the Europeans.
Yes, we could have implemented many projects. By all appearances, they were pipe dreams…. But why not fantasize a little? If Defense Minister Ustinov had not allowed the invasion of Afghanistan and had given half of the funds spent on that war to cosmonautics, the nation would not only have saved 15,000 lives—we would have built a permanently operating base on the Moon.

"Why did the TKS flew on the Proton and not on the new N-11 ?"

"The history of the TKS is typical of the Soviet way of doing things – of the incessant infighting between design bureaus and top engineers.

The TKS was created in 1968 by Vladimir Chelomei as a logistic, support ship for the military Almaz space station, the Soviet answer to the American MOL manned spysat. But in 1970 a streak of panick ran across the Soviet space program. The civilian Skylab was to launch in 1972, and neither Almaz nor the giant MKBS-1 would be ready before that date – meaning another space race lost by the Soviet Union in the wake of the Moon race. That was not acceptable, so in a crash program Almaz hulls were transferred to Mishin OKB-1 and outfitted with Soyuz subsystems to create Salyut.

Neither Chelomei nor Mishin were happy with that decision, the latter being interested first, in the lunar program, and secondly, in the giant MKBS-1, the “true” civilian space station. But Ustinov and Glushko didn't cared.

Undauted in April 1972 the two underdogs Mishin and Chelomei had an agreement to use the TKS as the support ship for the future MKBS-1.

In 1974, as America confirmed it would launch Liberty soon, a major reorganization swept across the Soviet manned program. Mishin was sacked and replaced by myself. All of sudden the MKBS-1 had top priority against anything else. That was fortunate for the TKS, since the MKBS-1 needed a much bigger support ship than Soyuz. It was Chelomei revenge; all of sudden, the often neglected, ignored chief designer had a manned ship at the forefront. Unfortunately for Chelomei, the wrath of Ustinov still raged.

In the end Chelomei design bureau was given to Glushko as a consolation prize (Glushko wanted to succeed Mishin, but he also wanted to scrap the N-1, and that was not acceptable since NASA kept some Saturn Vs in mothball).

A major issue with the TKS was that its launcher, the dirty and unreliable Proton. Since the MKBS-1 was to be launched by leftover N-1s, I, Boris Chertok leaped on the opportunity to replace Proton with the N-11, essentially the upper stages of the N-1. It was a bold idea, but we had already lost more than a decade – we had made a similar proposal as early as 1962 !

In history, one should not resort to the “what ifs,” but I am not a historian and I can allow myself to conjecture how everything would have unfolded if our 1962 proposal had been enacted. There is no doubt that we would have produced the N-11 considerably sooner than the first N-1 flight model. We could have conducted developmental testing on the second and third stages of the rocket on the firing rigs near Zagorsk at NII-229 (as later happened).23 The launch systems that were constructed for the N-1 would have been simplified to be used for the N-11 during the first phase. We missed a real opportunity to produce an environmentally clean launch vehicle for a 25-metric-ton payload. To this day, world cosmonautics has a very acute need for such a clean launch vehicle. But at that time, that idea could have interfered with Chelomei’s proposals for the UR-500 and Yangel’s proposals for the R-56. We lost that battle in 1962, but had our revenge in 1974, when decision was taken to keep the N-1 and not create some new heavy launcher such as Glushko RLA.

Ideally, the TKS should have been transferred from Proton to the N-11. But Glushko disagreed. The frustrated engineer wanted to run his own parallel space program, and to achieve that he had to kept the Proton flying (for the record, he had created the RD-253 engines that powered the Proton).

The end result was a costly duplicate of capacities. As the N-11 gradually replaced Proton in many roles during the 80's, the Proton kept launching TKS spaceships to the MKBS-1 at the rate of two per year ! Meanwhile again and again did Glushko proposed to launch more Salyuts and more Almaz, even if the MKBS-1 completely dawrfed them.


***


In 1974 Glushko stubbornely insisted to cancel the N-1 rocket. That decision cost him a possible leadership of the entire Soviet manned space effort. He wouldn't be leader of OKB-1; Mishin deputy Boris Chertok bet him. Ustinov decision greatly frustrated Glushko. Because he couldn't take over Mishin OKB-1, Glushko instead decided to dismantle Chelomei own empire and makes it his own. Undaunted, Glushko then decided to run his own space program in parallel with Chertok MKBS-1.

In 1976 Glushko went to see Ustinov with a long range space station plan. Due to the N-1 lack of reliability the MKBS-1 wouldn't be launched until the early 80's at best. So there was a five year gap between Salyut 4 and the future giant space station.

Glushko plan intended to fill that gap by testing assembly of large space station modules.

Step 1 consisted of back-to-back docking of the last two Salyuts, DOS-5 and DOS-6. That 40 tons complex would be serviced by Chertok Soyuz. Two Soyuz could dock, one at each end of the complex.

Step 2 was a little more ambitious. The Almaz program had been canned after the OPS-2 launch in 1974, leaving two unused hulls grounded – OPS-3 and OPS-4. So the two could be docked together, back-to-back like the DOS. The cargo and crew ship however would be the massive TKS. Two TKS could be docked at each end of the Almaz. Altogether the four ships would weight 80 tons.

Truth be told Glushko didn't knew what to do with the Almaz hulls. He was much more interested in the continuing development of the civilian Salyut. In order to get ride of Almaz once and for all, Glushko drafted ambitious plans around OPS-3 and OPS-4.

The two hulls could be launched as radioastronomy ships outfitted with immense foldable antennas – KRT – with a diameter of 25 or 30 meters. If launched by the usual Proton, they would go to a 300 miles, 65 degree inclination orbit. But Glushko was even ready to allow launch by the big N-1 rocket he hated so much. After all he did not really cared about the Almaz, and two launches would exhaust the supply of remaining N-1 he loathed. Orbit would be 5.000 x 20.000 km inclined 63,45º - later 5.000 x 150.000 km. As an alternative a simpler gesoynchronous orbit could be selected. Because they were the son of Almaz, the spacecrafts would have been man-tended. Glushko found that its Proton could loft a truncated, lighter TKS to geosynchronous orbit.

Step 3 was even more ambitious. Once again, DOS-7 and DOS-8 would be docked back-to-back. The two Salyuts would be modified with the MKBS-1 multiple docking aparatus. The module had four lateral docking ports and one radial. So step 3 was a true modular space station somewhat rivalling, if not duplicating, the much bigger MKBS-1. Needless to say that meant it had zero chance of ever launch. That did not prevented Glushko from actually building the modules as “insurance” if the N-1 carrying the MKBS-1 failed. That couple of modified Salyut hulls was informally known as Mir, the russian word for peace. The hulls were build in the mid-80's and then mothballed. They were finally launched in the late 90's as the next generation space station beyond Liberty and MKBS-1.

(...)

From 1976 onwards with help from Dmitryi Ustinov, Valentin Glushko took control of Chelomei empire. Glushko grabbed the TKS, Proton and Almaz. He was given back Salyut since Chertok OKB-1 was busy enough with the MKBS-1.

After 1973 the main budgetary effort was going into the MKBS-1 large space station yet Glushko had only peripheral role in it. Building from the TKS, Almaz and Salyut Glushko pushed hard for a modular space station instead of the monolithic MKBS-1, but his efforts were in vain. Almaz died a quiet death, Salyut give place to the MKBS-1, and even the TKS ferry was to be replaced by a Super Soyuz. Glushko optimism and activism however went unabated. In the early 80's since the road to a large space station was blocked by the MKBS-1, with Ustinov support Glushko turned toward lunar bases. Their objective was aparently to start a manned lunar program for Lenin 120th anniversary on April 22th 1990 with the hope of a lunar landing in the year 2000.

When he took over Chelomei empire Glushko found the LK-700 project of large, direct ascent lander. But the UR-700 huge booster was dead; only Glushko RD-270 engine survived.

During the Moon Race, the N-1 and OKB-1 Chief Designer Sergei Korolev had a serious disagreement with the Glushko, who had, up to that point, supplied all the main engines for its first stages. Officially Korolev’s Chief Deputy, Vasily Mishin, had asked for way too advanced specifications on the engine requirements and insisted on kerosene or hydrogen and liquid oxygen as propellant. Glushko had offered a most advanced and powerful engine, but only with the highly toxic hypergolic propellent combination, in which he had a lot of experience, specially on the staged combustion cycle. The discussion escalated to a closed door shouting match between Korolev and Glushko. They never talked again.

Korolev handed over the task of designing N-1 engines to the aircraft turbine manufacturer Kutznesov and Glushko sided with Korolev’s opponent Vladimir Chelomei, Chief Designer at OKB-52. They came up with the UR-700 project for the Moon race. The derivative UR-700M, a 35,000,000lb (16,000 tonnes) monster rocket would have dwarfed even the Saturn V and would have been the rocket to enable the Soviets to conquer Mars.

To power such a project, Glushko decided to use the most advanced cycle for turbopump fed engines, the full flow or full staged combustion. It used the hypergolic combination of N2O4 and UDMH as propellant.

Such an engine, with a single nozzle RD-270, had a sea level thrust of 1,400klbf (6.3MN) and an isp of 301s, while in a vacuum it provided a thrust of 1,500klbf (6.7MN) and an isp of 322s.

Not only was this the most powerful “per nozzle” engine ever attempted in the USSR, but it had an amazing 127 T/W ratio at sea level and sported an unheard of 3,858psi (26.6MPa) pressure in the main combustion chamber. A record that not even NPO Energomash’s latest RD-191, at just 3,727psi (25.7MPa), could match.

From October 23, 1967 to July 24, 1969 this engine hit the test stand and 22 prototypes performed a total of 27 firing. Only nine of those tests were nominal. While the most difficult problems were overcome, instability problems where not completely solved and the project was axed as part of the UR-700 project cancellation.

To this day the Russian engine that was destined to enable Mars exploration still holds the biggest thrust per nozzle record for any staged or full staged combustion engine.

Undaunted, from 1977 Glushko lobied for the so-called Polyblok. The Polyblok was essentially a much enlarged Proton first stage with RD-270s instead of RD-253s. It used Proton tooling and diameter. Six powerful RD-270 would be attached to six oxidizer tanks fed from a unique, central fuel tank. Glushko argued that his massive polyblok could go under Chertok N-11, creating a superheavy rocket much more reliable than the 30-engines N-1. The polyblok could also go under a Proton, creating another superheavy booster reminiscent of the mammoth UR-700 and accomplishing Glushko lifelong dream of a lunar base.
 
Last edited:
Some back notes

Korolev hated Glushko deeply, because later wrongly accused Korolev of treason so ending up in Soviet Gulach.
To make matter worst Korolev had to work with Glushko for OKB-1 projects like R-7 rocket
Finally it ended in this escalated discussion to a closed door shouting match about N1 engines...

In history, one should not resort to the “what ifs,” but I am not a historian and I can allow myself to conjecture how everything would have unfolded if our 1962 proposal had been enacted

in My and SpaceGeek TL 2001: A Space-Time Odyssey Depict This:
here Sergei Khrushchev get job is at Korolev OKB-1 instead Chelomei OKB-52
in 1961 Sergei Korolev proposed a Modular rocket family simply called „Nositjel“ (Launch vehicle) were the upper stage function as smaller launch rocket.
After Study by MoM in 1962 became „Nositjel 1/2/3“ official the new launcher Family of USSR. the losers in game Chelomei, Yangel and on long term Glushko.
until 1971 Kuznetsov OKB-276 became major supplier for Rocket engine for „Nositjel“, while Glushko ended up at military ICBM programs...
More here https://www.alternatehistory.com/wiki/doku.php?id=timelines:2001_a_space-time_odyssey

Bonus for Soviet: this man is first on Moon
19751403824_81eaa27e09.jpg
 

Archibald

Banned
Nice twist. First man on the Moon is (usually) Gus Grissom, so why couldn't the (equally) unfortunate Komarov have his chance, too ?
 
Cold war heating up (1)

Archibald

Banned
March 8, 1983

"So, in your discussions of the nuclear freeze proposals, I urge you to beware the temptation of pride, the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault, to ignore the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire, to simply call the arms race a giant misunderstanding and thereby remove yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil. ... They preach the supremacy of the state, declare its omnipotence over individual man and predict its eventual domination of all peoples on the Earth. They are the focus of evil in the modern world."

(Ronald Reagan)

March 23, 1983

"I call upon the scientific community who gave us nuclear weapons to turn their great talents to the cause of mankind and world peace: to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete... today physicists peering into the infinitely small realms of subatomic particles find reaffirmations of religious faith. Astronomers build a space telescope that can see to the edge of the universe and possibly back to the moment of creation. So, yes, this nation remains fully committed to America's space program. We're going forward with our space station. We are going forward with research on a new Orient Express that could, by the end of the next decade, take off from Dulles Airport and fly to Tokyo within 2 hours at 25 times the speed of sound. We are going forward with a rocket ship able to bring tourists in earth orbit. And the same technology transforming our lives can solve the greatest problem of the 20th century. A security shield can one day render nuclear weapons obsolete and free mankind from the prison of nuclear terror. America met one historic challenge and went to the Moon. Now America must meet another: to make our strategic defense real for all the citizens of planet Earth..."

(Ronald Reagan)


March 27, 1983

"...In an unusual display of rhetorical anger, the Soviet Union’s General Secretary, Yuri Andropov, responded to the US’s announcement of its development of an anti-ballistic missile defense by accusing President Reagan of “inventing new plans on how to unleash a nuclear war in the best way, with the hope of winning it.” Andropov unusually heated rhetoric denounced the US program as a “bid to disarm the Soviet Union in the face of the US nuclear threat.” Such space-based defense, he says, “would open the floodgates of a runaway race of all types of strategic arms, both offensive and defensive. Such is the real significance, the seamy side, so to say, of Washington’s ‘defensive conception.‘… The Soviet Union will never be caught defenseless by any threat.… Engaging in this is not just irresponsible, it is insane.… Washington’s actions are putting the entire world in jeopardy.”


***

"What might save us, me, and you,

Is if the Russians love their children too"
(STING & The Police)


...

Adrian Veidt: Thank you, Dan, but I fear there's something much more real to worry about than Rorschach's mask killer.

Dan Dreiberg: If the Russians do launch their nukes, can Jon really stop them?

Adrian Veidt: The Soviets have 51,000 warheads stockpiled. Even if Jon stops 99 percent of them, the 1 percent that get through could still kill every living thing on Earth. Even Dr. Manhattan can't be everywhere at once.


...
 
Nice twist. First man on the Moon is (usually) Gus Grissom, so why couldn't the (equally) unfortunate Komarov have his chance, too ?

Exactly and if there one who deserve to be first on moon than vladimir Komarov

Adrian Veidt: Thank you, Dan, but I fear there's something much more real to worry about than Rorschach's mask killer.

Dan Dreiberg: If the Russians do launch their nukes, can Jon really stop them?

Adrian Veidt: The Soviets have 51,000 warheads stockpiled. Even if Jon stops 99 percent of them, the 1 percent that get through could still kill every living thing on Earth. Even Dr. Manhattan can't be everywhere at once.

This from comic Watchmen by writer Alan Moore, artist Dave Gibbons (highly recommend reading)
A TL were Real Superheros exist and even them are helpless in face of nuclear Destruction.
 
Soviets in space (24)

Archibald

Banned
March 3, 1983

Kosmos 1443 lifted off from Kazakhstan aboard a Proton booster. Cosmos 1443 was a FGB, the cargo section of TKS without a crew capsule. With the advent of the MKBS both Soyuz and TKS should have transitioned to new boosters from the N-1 family (Groza and Uragan), in fact cut-down lunar rockets. While Soyuz transition to N-111 was well on track, the TKS remained stuck with Proton. Both Proton and TKS had been salvaged by Glushko from the ruins of Chelomei empire. Glushko was more or less blackmailing Chertok: your MKBS needs the TKS as a heavy cargo ship, but the TKS needs the Proton to fly. Glushko had dragged his feet long enough that moving TKS to the N-11 would disrupt MKBS logistics.

Once in orbit, Kosmos 1443 docked to OPSEK-Mir with the intent of desorbiting the old space station. Firing its thrusters, it send the whole assembly into a deadly spin. OPSEK burned high above the Pacific, the debris sinking into 10 000 ft of water.
 

Archibald

Banned
Glushko refusal to move TKS from Proton to N-11 will have serious consequences at the end of Cold War, when two manned ships is too much due to budget cuts...
 
Glushko refusal to move TKS from Proton to N-11 will have serious consequences at the end of Cold War, when two manned ships is too much due to budget cuts...

Don't forget Glushko died on 10 January 1989 in age of 81 years
If ITTL collapse of Soviet union happen like OTL in august 1991, Chertok has 3 yeas time to take over OKB-52 and rivet a TKS on N-11.
 

Archibald

Banned
Alternate NRO missions

You can see that there is a KH-10B Blue Helios with rocket stages on the nose and tail, including a Centaur. The goal is to make large plane changes and climb higher and higher. OTL (post Apollo) space race was mostly stuck 200 miles high at 51.6 degree inclination. ITTL they will bust that limit.
The Soviets will do the same with TKS and Soyuz together with Briz-M... which bring us to Space Adventures and Excalibur-Almaz manned lunar flybys. The tech is the same.

http://issfd.org/ISSFD_2009/Exploration/Wilkinson.pdf

The Briz-M upper stage consists of a main engine with a small primary fuel tank and a surrounding second larger toroidal fuel tank. Removal of the toroidal tank is possible and creates a smaller "mini" version of the Briz-M.

While the Proton family has been in existence for more than four decades, the hardware and capabilities of the machine have improved with time. The result of these changes is a launcher with the capability to put 21 tonnes into low Earth orbit (LEO). Since the mass of the Almaz capsule is less that 7 tonnes, a considerable percentage of the Briz-M’s fuel remains for a TLI burn. As a replacement to the Block-D upper stage, the Briz-M was designed to take up less volume than its predecessor while providing more thrust. The Briz consists of an engine, central small tank, and toroidal large outer tank, which can be removed. A single Briz stage has been rated and published to put roughly 6 tonnes into a lunar flyby trajectory. This mass is on the low end of what is required for a crewed command and service module with supplies. In order to increase the available mass for the payload, the main commercial supplier of Protons, International Launch Services (ILS), has developed an additional “half” stage configuration using a second Briz-M with the outer tank removed. ILS has stated that the use of the dual Briz configuration, with the smaller engine burning first, can take a payload of 7 tonnes into a lunar free return trajectory.

Augmenting the upper stage with the mini-Briz increases the launch weight but also provides additional fuel and reduces the total fuel expenditure of the main Briz-M to reach either type of Earth orbit. The launch profile has been analyzed to determine if there is enough fuel left in the Briz-M to propel 7 tonnes to a lunar flyby. Knowing the masses of fuel and structure for the two Briz engines and the 7 tonnes for the payload, we determined the maximum delta-V of the combined system as well as the required amount of fuel to accomplish the mission. The difference in these two values was the total fuel available to take the entire stack, the two engines and the payload, from its position at stage 3 burn out to LEO.

Assuming that both engines burn the entirety of their fuel stores, the total delta-V that the engines can produce is 4.1 km/s, of which 3.6 km/s is the Briz-M and 0.5 km/s is the mini-Briz-M.

Since the required delta-V for lunar flyby is roughly 3.15 km/s, there is enough fuel between the two Briz engines for a delta-V of 0.9 km/s to take the stack from third stage burnout to low Earth orbit and still have enough fuel for TLI. An analysis of the launch of the Proton rocket’s first three stages launching a dual Briz M fourth stage plus 7000 kg Almaz payload.

From this analysis, we found that the “Proton-Heavy” has the following post-stage 3 burnout characteristics: an inclination of 51.6 degrees, downrange distance of roughly 1800 km, altitude of roughly 200 km, and velocity of 7.2 km/s. At a parking orbit of 277.8 km (150 nm) the orbital velocity is 7.74 km/s. Further analysis indicated that a finite burn of approximately 0.8 km/s can take the stack from stage 3 burn out to LEO. Thus, the smaller Briz-M engine will burn its total fuel weight and achieve 0.5 km/s of delta-V, leaving roughly 0.3 km/s delta V for the main Briz-M. This will leave 3.3 km/s of delta-V in the Briz-M for the TLI burn, which requires a maximum of 3.15 km/s. This indicates that the dual Briz configuration has the capability of placing 7 tonnes of payload into lunar flyby with a 0.15 km/s delta-V safety margin.

Also, X-27F could pick up a KH-9 film bucket and bring it back to the East Coast of the USA, where Kodak and NRO will develop and analyse it. The X-27F could land at Andrews AFB near Washington.

There are rumours that the X-23 ASSET / PRIME unpiloted lifting body could have done that in the mid-60's, picking up a filmbucket from a Corona or Gambit. There might be a paper study hidden in the NRO archive somewhere...

A X-27F could also rendezvous and dock with the KH-10B. Then the crew would pack rolls of film into the spaceplane small payload bay.
 
Last edited:
Soviets in space (25)

Archibald

Banned
"Unlike the N-1, the Saturn V used a high-performance cryogenic upper stage fueled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. Throughout 1968, as the race slowly slipped through their hands, many Soviet designers clearly realized that although the N-1 had arrived as a real quantity on the launch pad at Tyura-Tam, it had much room for improvement, specifically its use of propellants. An increased payload would allow engineers to amend one of the weakest elements of the N-1-L3 plan and increase the crew size from two to three. The late Korolev had persistently tried to create a liquid hydrogen engine development program in the early 1960s, and the effort was finally producing results by 1967-68 with the establishment of a modest production base as well as the first static tests of actual engines.

The model with the best prospects, which began static tests in 1967, was the 11D56 engine with a thrust of seven and a half tons, a creation of the Design Bureau of Chemical Machine Building under Chief Designer Isayev based in Kaliningrad. Two other engines, the 11D54 and 11D57, built by the Saturn Design Bureau under Chief Designer Lyulka, were also approaching the ground testing stage by 1968.

The decision to select Isayev's 11D56 engine over Lyulka's 11D57 engine for Blok Sr had as much to do with technical considerations as it did with bureaucratic infighting. Lyulka's engine had run into serious technical trouble in 1970. By July, it was clear that its testing program was severely lagging, and by the end of the year, planners had all but given up on its use in the immediate future. The technical issues were compounded by interministerial jealousies. Lyulka's organization, the design bureau of the Saturn Plant, was part of the Ministry of Aviation industry, and thus outside the "mainstream" of the Soviet space industry, which was part of the Ministry of General Machine Building. The latter's head, Minister Afanasyev, was evidently unwilling to have another chief designer from the aviation industry "interfere" in the N-1-L3 program. While Lyulka doggedly continued his work on Blok R, his engine was temporarily sidelined from the N-1 program.

Lyulka's 11D57 engine production stopped in 1975 after 105 were built. During the testing period, the engine had accumulated more than 53,000 seconds of full-engine run time."



***



May 19, 1983

They were all gathered, all the heavyweights of the soviet space program that hated each other so much. But they were forced to cooperate - Glushko and Chertok, Ustinov and Chelomei, Dementyev and Afanasyev, aviation and rocketry ministries, rival design bureaus.

The emergence of a flexible American space plane, of the Trans Atmospheric Vehicle that could fly out of an airport and goes into orbit, forced a symetrical answer in the name of Cold War and the equation of balanced terror.

All of sudden, every Soyuz and TKS capsules, every throwaway rocket like the venerable Soyuz and Proton, all were headed the way of the dinosaur. Even Soviet concepts of reusable launchers were obsolete. Except for MAKS, of course, but even this one needed a serious overhaul. External tanks were now seriously old-fashioned.

"There's a name that come over and over, that of Robert Salkeld." Serguey Afanasyev opened the meeting. "He is aparently central to the American single stage to orbit new program. The issue: we are at odds over what concept that man favour. At times we heard about that crazy aerial refueling sheme; and then he switches back to tri-propellant, which looks like a hobby of him. We just don't really know - perhaps the American are trying to fool us ?"

"I don't believe that aerial refueling will lead anywhere. By contrast Mig's Lozino Lozinskiy has rapidly progressed in tri-propellant technology as a sequel to the original Spiral project." Dementyev nodded at that man.

"The Spiral project ran from 1965 to 1976." Lozinskiy started "It consisted of a very fast aircraft with advanced propulsion; flying at six thousand kilometer per hour it would release an expendable rocket booster with a manned lifting body. The lower aircraft was just not feasible, but the lifting body undergone a series of tests. A manned variant, the MiG-105 has been flown for many years; while subscale, unmanned BOR-4 models were boosted into suborbital flights."

What Lozinskiy quietly forgot to say was that Spiral had undergone a severe hiatus between 1976 and 1983, when the threat of an American shuttle was at its lowest. The Soviet leadership felt there was no urge in forging an answer, and so Spiral was essentially left in life-support.

All this had been blown away by Reagan SDI / Orient Express speech. Now the shuttle returned in force, as a massive NASA / military effort.

So the Soviet leadership scrambled for an answer, reviewing Oleg Gurko M(G)-19 pretty unrealistic nuclear powered vehicle, before stumbling on what was left of the Spiral program. Fortunately for them Lozino-Lozinskiy had wasted no time. Despite the hiatus and severe underfunding he had refined Spiral again and again in many steps.

"From 1977 we dropped the unrealistic mach 5 carrier aircraft - after a brief, tentative study of Gurko nuclear M(G)-19 as a potential successor. We went instead with the subsonic, massive Antonov 124 military transport.

"Early on we had two separate expendable stages, one with a kerosene-fueled NK-43, the other a RD-57 with liquid hydrogen. Both used liquid oxygen as the oxidizer. That was called System 49, and was pretty cumbersome. The following Bizan design integrated the liquid hydrogen tank into the space plane, still with a kerosene rocket booster powered by a NK-43. That was not very practical, so the next step was to bring together hydrogen and kerosene into a single rocket engine. Thus, and very much like that American, Salkeld, we thought about a dual-fuel engine, the RD-701; kerosene at liftoff, then switch to high-energy hydrogen.

Alas, nothing is more different from kerosene than hydrogen, and now we lack time to build a brand new engine. So we went back to the drawing board and reworked the RD-701 into the RD-704 Thrust Augmented Nozzle. It consists of an hydrogen engine with a kerosene afterburner."

"So the core engine stuck with pure hydrogen, and kerosene is introduced only in the exhaust ?" Glushko asked.

"Indeed. It is very much like an aircraft afterburner."

"Wait a minute.” Glushko was scribing rapidly on his notepad. “Could we add that afterburner to an existing hydrogen rocket ?" Chelomei asked.

"Surely. For example, we could add it to Lyulka big RD-57 or to Isayev smaller RD-56. In the end that thing has all the advantages of tri-propellant rockets without the inherent complications of dual-fuel and mixed-mode operations." Lozino concluded.

"We need flexibility akin to the American vehicle." Glushko said, only to threw a wrench into his rival plan. So there's no way we mount the spaceplane atop the carrier aircraft, above the Antonov. Way too complicated too handle at ordinary airports."

"Are you seriously considering dropping that thing from under the wing ? No room there, the jet engines are too big." Chelomei inquired. Glushko did not even looked him.

"We should drop that thing from inside the Antonov belly. That way it could be loaded like an ordinary tank or freight pallet" Glushko continued.

"Except wing span will have to be short." Chertok retorqued.

"Nope." Chelomei interrupted him. "All of Spiral offsprings have foldable wings for reentry, plus BOR-4 also folds it wings under his launcher payload shroud."

"Are you telling this assembly you intend to parachute the spaceplane, wing folded, out of the Antonov bay ?" Glushko snapped.

"In the name of operational flexibility, yes, this might be the best bet." Chelomei barked.

"And how much payload to orbit, anyway ?" Ustinov interrupted Chelomei with great pleasure.

"Air-launch rockets can't hope to lift more than 10 tons to orbit - except that TAN burst those limits by a factor of 2.5." Chertok said.

"So that space plane of yours could lift 25 tons to Earth orbit ?" Ustinov insisted

"Yes. Enough to replace the Proton and its derivatives." Chelomei answered, throwing an arrow at Glushko pathetic atempt to go back into the rocket business.

"And the N-11 / N-111 family, for that matter" Glushko retorqued, this time for Chertok. The latter just raised his shoulders.

"We have to live with it - beside my N-1, most throwaway boosters are headed to the scrap yard. But isn't this what we all desired so much ? Easy access to space at a lower cost; flexibility through aircraft-like operations."

For once, no accrimonious answers followed. Chertok had a point.

It looked as if the meeting was to conclude on that unexpected truce between rocket designers. Unfortunately, at this very moment a different war broke out.

"Comrade Dementyev, how is that Gurkolyot project going ?" Serguey Afanasyev (innocently) inquired, in fact throwing one of his nuclear missiles into Dementyev aviation backyard. And indeed, as the missile landed, for a split second Dementyev was baffled enough he didn't answered.

"Very fine, and so is my son working on that project as Lozinskyi deputy" he finally retorqued, bombing Afanasyev back into the stone age. Through my son I can wreck that project and impose Gurko vehicle instead. Understood, Serguey ?

Ustinov sighed. He was ministry of defense, and that included both aircrafts and missiles, so he little patience for the turf war between the two branches. He waved the two silent.

"This is enough. Gurko project is not realistic, with all those different engines - turbofans and ramjets and scramjets and rockets and a nuclear reactor ! At least they are all running on liquid hydrogen, except we have zero experience with hydrogen turbofans..."

"But we planed to modify an Il-76 transport to achieve that." Dementyev answered.

"Then you will love what follow. Listen; it's an idea from Glushko. Valentin ?"

"All those Spiral follow-on projects were to be air dropped, as we saw. We need a hefty transport for that, and fortunately the massive Antonov 124 Ruslan has just flown. Even this one, however, is not sufficient as if. So what I suggest is to fit the huge Antonov turbofans with an hydrogen afterburner. We could stuck some big hydrogen tank - a dewar - into the cargo bay, and feed the engines with that. Preliminary data show that hydrogen may providing up to 400 percent thrust augmentation. The Antonov would fly a zoom parabola, with vehicle separation or drop at 15,200–16,800 meters (50,000–55,000 feet) altitude."

"What I suggested" and, from the look of Ustinov eyes, it was more an order than a suggestion "is to cancell the Gurkolyot studies except for work on hydrogen turbofans, that would redirected to modification of an Antonov 124 and its Lotarev engines. I shall remember all of you that the Americans have a serious headstart. We have to make quick progresses. As an early step, we should test Lozino-Lozinskyi kerosene afterburner on the RD-56 and RD-57 engines. That will be our uttermost priority."
 
GASPING

Hydrogene Oxygens engine with Supersonic Kerosine Afterburner ?!
Kerosin Jet engine with Hydrogene Afterburner ?!

THIS IS STROKE OF GENIUS, Archibald !!!

Let me explain
the RD-701 not only burns Oxygens with Kerosine and later with Hydrogene
It's most complex rocket engine ever designed
the RD-701 featuring 5 Turbo pumps ! powered by 2 preburner (oxygen/kerosene)
kerosine and Hydrogen have apart feed-line into the two high pressure combustion chambers
already at ignition Hydrogen is used to cool the combustion chambers
 
Top