A Victorious Nazi Germany with Lebensraum would...

A Victorious Nazi Germany with Lebensraum would...

  • Be a Hyperpower

    Votes: 14 5.6%
  • Be a Superpower

    Votes: 69 27.5%
  • Be a Great Power

    Votes: 36 14.3%
  • Be a Regular Power

    Votes: 4 1.6%
  • Collapse in on itself

    Votes: 128 51.0%

  • Total voters
    251
1.) Germany coordinates better with Japan, they attack the SU together, they don`t attack the US

The Soviets smash the Japanese attack.

2.) The axis pretends it wants to free the people of Russia from the evil SU and wants to restore Russia, Ukraine etc. They actually treat russians nice. This leads to some kind of civil war lead by general wlassow. Once the war is won, Germany betrays the russians though.

The German war economy chokes to death.
 
They would be a great power, able to draw on their vassals across Europe not much else, they have no friends. Their best case scenario is great power, they're about as likely to collapse.
 
People go for superpower Nazi Germany or Nazi Germany conquering everything on the planet.

I've come to fancy the idea of a dull victorious Germany that can only become as powerful as Great Britain on a good day, and collapses after serious economic mismanagement in the long term.
 

nbcman

Donor
Well then, my bad, I just read that sentence:
"If Germany were to somehow win WWII and seize their desired territories in the East"

I didn`t really look at the map that closely. According to the map, Germany would just be a very strong great power but not a superpower.

A few changes:

1.) Germany coordinates better with Japan, they attack the SU together, they don`t attack the US (leads to an axis victory in africa and makes it easier for german armies at the eastern front)
Japan doesn't have the Army to seriously attack the Soviets while they are up to their neck in China. Also, it is unlikely that Italy and a small German contingent will be able to bring an Axis victory even if the SU loses. The Italian navy and merchant marine is too small to supply enough forces to occupy North Africa let alone all of Africa.
2.) The axis pretends it wants to free the people of Russia from the evil SU and wants to restore Russia, Ukraine etc. They actually treat russians nice. This leads to some kind of civil war lead by general wlassow. Once the war is won and the red army is destroyed, Germany betrays the russians though.
Then they are Notzis as opposed to Nazis. The Nazis were not going to treat the Slavs 'nice' after years of indoctrination. Who is going to starve when there is insufficient food in 1941, a German Landser or Hausfrau versus a Soviet POW or Ukrainian peasant?
3.) Germany starts its offensive one month earlier than in reality and provides its soldiers with winter equipment in time.
There was an avalanche of resources shipped to Germany from Russia in May and June 1941 including over 14,000 tons of natural rubber in addition to the grains, oil and other items which the Germans used to build up their stocks before invading the SU.

What will the Germans not ship to the front lines when they have to ship the winter equipment-ammunition, food, fuel??
4.) Albert Speer becomes German minister of armaments already in 1940, not in 1942. The Reich switches to full wartime production already in 1940, not in 1942.
Where will the Germans get the resources to increase production especially since they had resource shortages with their OTL 1940-1941 production.
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 1487

Japan doesn't have the Army to seriously attack the Soviets while they are up to their neck in China.
It seems no one is familiar with the Kwantung Army:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwantung_Army#Second_World_War
Or that they could have added the Southern Strike forces onto it too instead of invading the Pacific and South Asia. China could wait because they left the Kwantung army in Manchuria in OTL and used the Southern strike forces against the Allies all while being in China. Later the Kwangtung army was split up and part used for the Ichi-Go offensive. So they had probably 2 million men or more to use against Siberia if they wanted, but it would have to come at the expense of the Southern Strike.

As a side note before people bring up Kkhalkhin Gol as proof of Soviet superiority, remember that that battle was conducted by overwhelming forces by the Soviets in a surprise attack, not by outnumbered Soviet forces, as they would be in a North Strike by Japan during Barbarossa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battles_of_Khalkhin_Gol
Soviets:
Strength 61,860-73,961[nb 1]
498-550 tanks
385-450 armored cars[4][5]
809 aircraft[6]
500[7]-634[2] artillery pieces

Japan:
30,000
[8][9]-38,000[10]
73 tanks[5]
64 tankettes
250 aircraft[10]
~300 artillery pieces[2]
 
Then they are Notzis as opposed to Nazis. The Nazis were not going to treat the Slavs 'nice' after years of indoctrination. Who is going to starve when there is insufficient food in 1941, a German Landser or Hausfrau versus a Soviet POW or Ukrainian peasant?
Actually, the leadership of the Wehrmacht didn`t like to carry out some of the atrocities of the Nazi regime (even though they did comply in the end). And while many Germans were indoctrinated there is a reason why concentration camps were run and most mass shootings were conducted by special forces of the SS and not by the Wehrmacht. If Hitler would have ordered the Wehrmacht to treat russians like prisoners of war, they would have complied gladly. And everybody knows that Stalin treated Ukrainians and Russians like shit (I just want to mention holodomor)....millions of russians would have fought against the red army.
And as I told you, if that would have been just a ruse, a tactic to destabilize the SU, the Nazi party would have complied.
The thing with the food would have only been a problem if the war would last long, but I doubt that. The SU either collapses in the first two years of the war or it doesn`t collapse and then the war is lost either way.

That`s not an argument, the original plan was actually to start operation Barbarossa one month before it actually started. It was only postponed because Jugoslavia betrayed Germany. So in this alternate timeline Hitler just would have to diplomatically solve the problem with Jugoslavia. Or crush Jugoslavia faster.

What will the Germans not ship to the front lines when they have to ship the winter equipment-ammunition, food, fuel??
There was no problem with logistics at the start of operation barbarossa. The problem was that Hitler didn`t plan for a winter campaign. He (his military staff and the military of the British too by the way) thought the SU would be defeated after 2 months. So the Wehrmacht didn`t produce enough winter clothing etc beforehand. A grave mistake.

Where will the Germans get the resources to increase production especially since they had resource shortages with their OTL 1940-1941 production.
While it is true that they didn`t have available as much ressources as 1942, there was still much room for improvement. Source: wikipedia

"
At the time of Speer's accession to the office, the German economy, unlike the British one, was not fully geared for war production. Consumer goods were still being produced at nearly as high a level as during peacetime. No fewer than five "Supreme Authorities" had jurisdiction over armament production—one of which, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, had declared in November 1941 that conditions did not permit an increase in armament production. Few women were employed in the factories, which were running only one shift. One evening soon after his appointment, Speer went to visit a Berlin armament factory; he found no one on the premises.



Speer overcame these difficulties by centralizing power over the war economy in himself. Factories were given autonomy, or as Speer put it, "self-responsibility", and each factory concentrated on a single product"

There you can see how successful Speer was.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alber...anzerwagen_in_Deutschland_1941-1944_ver.2.png
 
Last edited:
Thats a strange map. They respects Finnish independence(and not Swedish neutrality) but take land that is rightfully Italian territory.

Anyway a victorious Nazi regime is basically like the victorious Ho Chi Minh regime. In war they wre effective and knew how to win but once there was peace they had no idea how to run the country and went to the extreme with everything untill it all collapsed.
 

nbcman

Donor
It seems no one is familiar with the Kwantung Army:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwantung_Army#Second_World_War
Or that they could have added the Southern Strike forces onto it too instead of invading the Pacific and South Asia. China could wait because they left the Kwantung army in Manchuria in OTL and used the Southern strike forces against the Allies all while being in China. Later the Kwangtung army was split up and part used for the Ichi-Go offensive. So they had probably 2 million men or more to use against Siberia if they wanted, but it would have to come at the expense of the Southern Strike.

As a side note before people bring up Kkhalkhin Gol as proof of Soviet superiority, remember that that battle was conducted by overwhelming forces by the Soviets in a surprise attack, not by outnumbered Soviet forces, as they would be in a North Strike by Japan during Barbarossa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battles_of_Khalkhin_Gol

See this thread from a few months ago about a Japanese invasion of the USSR.


I had not forgotten the Kwantung Army but it was not large enough to seriously attack without being reinforced. Adding the 11 divisions used for the Southern strike would not be enough to activate the limited land grab against a collapsing Soviet Union envisioned by Operation Kantokuen (approximately 700,000 men). Also note that Operation Kantokuen was not created until after the Nazi's attacked. Prior to that, the plan was for a full strength invasion 'Hachi-go' which called for 1.3 million men or 80% of their total Army strength of 1.7 million including pulling the majority of the IJA forces from China.
 

Deleted member 1487

Interesting. What would the numbers of Kwangtung Army vs Soviet Far Eastern forces be for a strike north beginning, say, around the same time as Operation Typhoon?
Japan wouldn't attack until the Soviets thinned out their numbers and looked ready to collapse, so probably not until September-October. The Kwantung army alone had IIRC about 1.3 million men and with the Southern Strike reinforcements probably over 2 million, while in the Soviet Far East there were ostensibly over 1 million Soviet troops, but low quality ones with old equipment as the best men and weapons were sent West. So no T-34s or even more modern pre-T34 tanks.
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=79&t=149223
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Red_Banner_Army#22_June_1941
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_Red_Banner_Army
 

Deleted member 1487


See this thread from a few months ago about a Japanese invasion of the USSR.


I had not forgotten the Kwantung Army but it was not large enough to seriously attack without being reinforced. Adding the 11 divisions used for the Southern strike would not be enough to activate the limited land grab against a collapsing Soviet Union envisioned by Operation Kantokuen (approximately 700,000 men). Also note that Operation Kantokuen was not created until after the Nazi's attacked. Prior to that, the plan was for a full strength invasion 'Hachi-go' which called for 1.3 million men or 80% of their total Army strength of 1.7 million including pulling the majority of the IJA forces from China.

Yet the IJA had 5.5 million men by 1945:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Japanese_Army#World_War_II
In 1941, the Imperial Japanese Army had 51 divisions[16] and various special-purpose artillery, cavalry, anti-aircraft and armored units with a total of 1,700,000 men. At the beginning of the Second World War, most of the Japanese Army (27 divisions) was stationed in China. A further 13 divisions defended the Mongolian border, due to concerns about a possible attack by the Soviet Union.[16] However, from 1942, soldiers were sent to Hong Kong (23rd Army), the Philippines (14th Army), Thailand (15th Army), Burma (15th Army), Dutch East Indies (16th Army) and Malaya (25th Army).[19] By 1945, there were 5.5 million men in the Imperial Japanese Army.
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Kantogun
Between 1941 and 1943 there were from 15 to 16 Japanese divisions, with a strength of about 700, 000 men, in Manchuria and Korea.
24 divisions was enough to pull off the invasion in phases, including cutting off a lot of Soviet forces around Vladivostok with naval help and no Soviet hope for rescue. The 24 divisions were actually more men than just 700k.


Plus they could mobilize more men, as the fact that they did mobilize 5.5 million by 1945 demonstrated.
Hokushin-ron-Map.svg


That then cuts off over 50% of LL aid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_Route
In 1941-42 then anything that came in via Murmansk or Persia was not going against Japan. Soviet force projection was only going to come via the Siberian RR, but Stalin couldn't send help anyway. They just had to use what they had on hand, which was only old men and boys with the old equipment that wasn't of use in the West.

So while the Soviets might have had more divisions spread out over the area the Japanese could concentrate theirs for phased attacks, focusing on cutting off and wiping out in detail Soviet forces in various areas, while using the poor infrastructure of the Soviet Far East as a defensive buffer, as the Soviets won't then able to mass and attack in certain areas like out of Mongolia, while using the mountains to their north to shield them as they cut off Vladivostok.

Claims that the Japanese were going to run out of fuel don't hold water as they stockpiled fuel for 2-3 years of major combat and IOTL did not get much out of the DEI due to the US USW campaign against their tankers and the sabotage by the Dutch of the oil fields, yet they were able to fight from 1942-45 mostly on existing stocks.

http://www.ww2f.com/topic/30105-ope...k-is-neutral-and-japan-attacks-siberia/page-3
It's not easy to discuss competently what the Red Army had in the Far
East during the first two years of the war. Most of the old soviet
sources provide data that is obviously wrong, post-soviet era authors
give more realistic view but they often contradict each other. So do
not expect from me any complete, hard figures on early Soviet OOB.
It's amazing that this is still a very poorly researched subject.

Official OOB indicates that on 22 june 1941 Far East Front and
Zabaikalsky Military District (actually another front) had 719228 men
in total. According to official sources the following troops had been
transferred from two soviet Far East fronts to the west armies during
july 1941 - july 1942 period: 28 rifle and cavalry divisions, 5 tank
divisions, 1 mechanized division, 5 rifle brigades, 14 artillery
brigades and 8 independent regiments (344676 men in total), during
almost the same period (august 1941 - october 1942) from the remaining
units in the Far East 235518 men more had been sent to the west as
"marching reinforcements".

So overall, from the outbreak of the war till october '42 Far East
Command transferred 580194 men to the west. These troops took almost
2/3 of Far East arsenal with them - 247382 rifles, 38921
submachine-guns, 2824 heavy machine-guns, 1210 AA guns, 4928 artillery
pieces, 4425 mortars, 2822 tanks, 13101 motor vehicles, 2563 artillery
tractors and 77929 horses, 65% of ammunition and supplies was taken
from the Far East Command warehouses and send in the same direction.
Most of the Far East competent commanders were also transferred to the
west armies, and very average men came to replace them.

It's easy to figure out what has been left in the Far East by summer
'42 - 139034 men with 2420 artillery (only 88 152mm howitzers left,
almost all others were 76mm field guns and 45mm AT guns), with just
428 light tanks (exclusively t-26) , very limited transport abilities
, ridiculously low on supplies and ammunition.

Officially, on 1 september 1942 soviet ground forces in the Far East
contained 1446800 personnel. However, it is well-known fact that not a
single man drafted in the european regions in 41-42 has been sent to
the Far East during that period. Thus one should suppose that Far East
Command under Josef Apanasenko had managed to locally recruit 1308966
men in just 13 months (and send almost 45 divisions to the west in the
same time), this just cannot be true. Wartime mobilization in the Far
East gave only 682515 recruits by late 1944 (Russian Far East is still
barely inhabited compared to european areas), there was also another
manpower source - prison camps, but again, out of 320000 or so gulag
inhabitants in the Far East in january '42 only ~80000 could have been
drafted theoretically.

There are some sources that describe in detail what General Apanasenko
did to maintain his forces during first two years of the war and how
difficult it was. For example "Sickle and Hammer Against Samurai
Sword" by К.Е. Cherevko and "Final in the Far East" by A.B.Shirokorad,
those are in russian obviously. Both authors are skeptical about
official figures for 1941-42 period they try to analyze how Apanasenko
had managed to double his forces during such a short period of time
with almost no manpower in the area while his armies had been used as
reinforcement source and what NKGB and GRU with their numerous agents
in Manchuria, China and even in Japan (Richard Sorge for instance) did
to convince Japanese of the presence of a large fully-equipped force
guarding soviet Far East during entire 1941-1942 period.


Far East Command ordered total mobilization in September '41, but it
brought too few recruits to replace those who had already left ,
during the second mobilization round in late november Apanasenko
called up even 40-55 aged men, so actually all who were able to carry
a weapon. In january '42 personnel bureau officers were inspecting the
camps of Kolyma and the whole Far East in order to seek out military
officers and soldiers who had fallen victim to the purges and tried to
put them back in service. How many men had they managed to draft that
way is unknown, since all these activities were barely legal and thus
undocumented, Stalin was unwilling to interfere and was determined to
protect Apanasenko from NKVD bosses. It just shows how dramatic
situation was.
Apanasenko really did an excellent job by keeping strong cover forces
at manchurian borders, but their numbers never exceeded 365000 men
during 1942. He really tried to replace leaving divisions with the new
formations, but none of these had full complement before late 1943.
Circumstantial evidences of this can be found in the open sources.

Monthly allowance directives of the Far East and Zabaikalsky Fronts
HQs in august-october 1942 are referring to "regular allowance order
#4/120", this means that all but one Far East rifle divisions were
"reduced formations" and did not contain more than 5800 men, 9 rifle
companies instead of 21 in full division (regular allowance directive
#4/100 - full rifle division with 14483 men).

Almost 38000 soviet soldiers, captured by germans in august 1942 in
Stalingrad area, were supposed be in the Far East according to their
papers, but instead were "temporary assigned" to the 62nd army units.
Take it as an educated guess - there were up to 200000 such "temporary
assigned" men, if 38000 such soldiers became POW.

In many personal accounts of the war written by far-easterners
interesting stories can be found, during 1942-early 1943 Far East
command practiced "false reinforcement" tactics, several temporary
formations of 1000-5000 men each were constantly moving from one
fortified region to another, imitating serious military activity in
those sectors. They were usually moving into positions visible by
japanese during the daylight with their "flags high" only to leave
them secretly by night.

In november '42 Apanasenko did a little sabre-rattling when he staged
in Kharbarovsk on the anniversary of the revolution "the largest
military parade that has been held in Russia since the outbreak of the
war". The Far East Command quietly allowed the Japanese to hear of
this force demonstration by publishing a short story of the mechanized
equipment that took part in the parade. In reality only one regiment
took part in this parade with heaviest armament in form of manually
towed Maxim MG.

Stavka directives #170149 and #170150 issued 16 march 1942 for the Far
East fronts clearly show what kind of war Soviet Command expected in
the case of Japanese attack. Far East troops should do their best to
wear down Japanese in fortified regions during first 7-10 days of war,
"defend at all costs" several key positions deep in the soviet
territory until reinforcements arrive.

All such facts do not correspond well with proclaimed soviet military
superiority over japanese. 1,5m battle-ready force simply did not
exist in the Far East in 1942. Officially recorded OOBs and some Far
East Front documents are just residual artifacts of brilliantly
executed by GRU disinformation campaign, which was never officially
announced. With japanese absolutely sure that there is numerically
superior force in front of them in 1941-1942, Soviet General Command
was able to freely move larger part of Far East forces to the West and
had a luxury to do nothing to rebuild that force until mid-1943. After
the war, Soviet historiography used false numbers to claim that USSR
was never on the verge of collapse during the war, since it was
capable to maintain such a big force in the Far East during crucial
period of war and kept "larger part" of Japanese army at bay. Abwher
advised IJA that there were no battle-worthy soviet troops in spring
'42 trying to persuade Japan to join the war, but they strongly
believed in soviet myth, they could not see beyond the soviet
trenches, had no abilities to collect data on Soviet territory
themselves and were unwilling to risk.

Even if there were only 365000 soviet troops maximum, they still could
be, theoretically, a force to be reckoned with. But in reality only
40th Rifle Division was adequately trained unit (almost untouched by
autumn '41 troops requisition), others being understrength, poorly
equipped, barely trained formations capable of only stationary defense
against equally weak opponent. As I've already mentioned, Far East
Front lost most of its heavy artillery, almost all tanks and transport
to the west armies, and received very little to replace that loss
before 1943. Apanasenko organized small arms production in major
cities, but that was never enough. In fact the need for armament was
so sheer that Apanasenko ordered to put back into full working order
thousands of training rifles in late 1941. Supplies situation was also
critical during first two years of war. There is one well-known
wartime letter written by certain Nikolay Soloviev, sergeant 1148 AT
battalion, he said that in 1942-43 soldiers at the front were
virtually starving, and some of them were so weak that they could not
hold rifle for more than 10 minutes, those in critical conditions were
usually sent to the regional collective farms or the "military state
farms" to recuperate.

So here is the picture - 360000+ poorly trained men, some 50+ aged
some former prisoners already exhausted by gulag, with refitted
training riffles with very limited supplies, guarded soviet Far East
for almost two years. That was a blueprint for disaster. Of course
situation has changed dramatically in 1943, and even before the
"autumn storm" armies arrived in summer 1945, Apanesenko already had
far more capable forces. But the fact is, in 1942 Japanese had a clear
cut chance to grab soviet Far East, Kwantung army was more than
adequate force to do the job.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think they'd go the same way as the Soviet Union did. They'd be one of two competing Superpowers next to the United States but would, after many decades of competing against Capitalism, eventually fracture and fall apart as internal tensions between the sides that want to open up to the world economy and the sides that still believe in the ideology fail to reconcile.

The difference is you'd be left with a Europe that's got a huge population slant towards Germans: given a few decades of killing Slavs and encouraging German girls to have as many kids as they can handle will result in what was the Warsaw Pact in Europe being populated predominantly by Germans, though I suspect that no real cities of importance will exist past Kiev: all that is Ukraine, Belarus and European Russia today would be a vast, almost empty land of self-contained agricultural towns.

I think an interesting question is what happens to the Reich? Does it fragment into German-Ukraine, German-Belarus, German-Poland and so on? Or does the whole Reich generally stay together but ends up being forced to ditch Naziism and become a Capitalist country?
 
It seems no one is familiar with the Kwantung Army:

Which was not the Army the Japanese wanted to execute Hachi-Go. Indeed, said army never existed. The 43-division plan drafted prior to Khalkin Gol was wholly theoretical. "Japanese Operational Planning against the USSR" notes that of the Seventh Army, slated to arrive from the Home Islands, and assist in the offensive against Soviet defences west of Vladivostok with an additional seven divisions, (the aforementioned source document) notes, "Although this army was included in projected plans, it was never actually organized." [emphasis mine]. The assault on Amur to the north in this 43 division plan was also to be undertaken by the Second Army, but again, the source document notes, "The Second Army was not organized until July 1942." [p.84] [emphasis mine, again] In short, the 43 division plan used forces that did not exist.

Another important part is what the IJA actually thought of their ability to execute it. Namely, that they couldn't. To quote "Japanese Operational Planning against the USSR" at length:

"After a joint study with the War Ministry, [IGH] reached the conclusion that Concept B [of Hachi-go] could be carried out only if (1) certain railroads (sketch 9) were made operational, (2) about 200,000 motor vehicles were made ready and (3) a great quantity of war materiel were stockpiled in the Hailar Plain area. Moreover, IGH felt that these requirements could not be satisfied for the time being due to the general situation, especially as regards the national power of Japan and particularly its natural resources." [p.108]

Planning for Hachi-go had revealed other problems with Japanese assumptions. Under Concept B the Japanese had assumed that relatively small forces in northern Manchuria could sever the Trans-Siberian railroad and cut off forces in Ussuri. Soviet stockpiling of supplies in Ussuri, and the construction of a parallel rail line some 200km north of the Trans Siberian railroad rendered these assumptions void. [p.114] This meant more significant forces would have to be devoted to the north and east - forces the Japanese could not support - not and also launch a major offensive west. If the Japanese could not isolate Soviet forces in the east, the Japanese were faced with the very real possibility of the envelopment of their own forces rather than the enemy. [p.117]

The planners also noted that victory under Concept B would require the army to achieve motorization and mechanization which, as of the plan's inception, it had not done so. [pp.134-135] Similarly it would have to attain superior strength in the air so as to ensure air superiority. [p.135]

Support for Concept B completely evaporated after Nomonhan, which revealed the key assumptions of Soviet strength and mobility, and Japanese ability to conduct offensive actions to the west to be sharply at odds with reality.

"The battle at Nomonhan provided a clear picture of the scale and characteristics of operations on the vast wasteland of the Hailar Plain, and suggested that a large-scale modern war might be fought in that area in the future. Japan's limited national strength at that time, however, did not permit the build-up of an army, the development of munitions industries, and the execution of pre-war preparations in the field to the extent of meeting the requirements of Concept B of Operational Plan no. 8."
[p.136]

Furthermore, Japanese entry against the Soviets would hardly have doomed the Soviets. Defeat in the Far East in August-December of 1941 wouldn't have changed the Battle for Moscow, and the Japanese had no means to push further west against areas that would have actually mattered for the Soviet Union. The same barren terrain and limited lines of communication the Japanese were (rather blithely) counting on to prevent large scale Soviet responses would also have allowed relatively small Soviet blocking forces to prevent further movement west by the IJA. The Soviets could economize in forces in the area until they were ready to drive the Japanese out.

The loss of the Far East would have hardly costed the Soviets anything they needed for victory either. The loss of Vladivostok would have hurt, since half of all Lend Lease ran through that port - but the allies used Vladivostok so much because it was the safest route, as well as the closest to the American west coast. Had Vladivostok been closed they'd have delivered the cargo through the Indian ocean, or the northern route. Longer and more perilous, but the allies had a surfeit of transport.

Yet the IJA had 5.5 million men by 1945:
So not 1941.

Claims that the Japanese were going to run out of fuel don't hold water as they stockpiled fuel for 2-3 years of major combat and IOTL did not get much out of the DEI due to the US USW campaign against their tankers and the sabotage by the Dutch of the oil fields, yet they were able to fight from 1942-45 mostly on existing stocks.
Absolutely hilarious. In March 1941, the Japanese had a stockpile of 42.7 million barrels of oil million barrels. In 1942-'44 they consumed more then twice of that. So where did those extra 50 million+ barrels come from?
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 1487

Which was not the Army the Japanese wanted to execute Hachi-Go. Indeed, said army never existed. The 43-division plan drafted prior to Khalkin Gol was wholly theoretical. "Japanese Operational Planning against the USSR" notes that of the Seventh Army, slated to arrive from the Home Islands, and assist in the offensive against Soviet defences west of Vladivostok with an additional seven divisions, (the aforementioned source document) notes, "Although this army was included in projected plans, it was never actually organized." [emphasis mine]. The assault on Amur to the north in this 43 division plan was also to be undertaken by the Second Army, but again, the source document notes, "The Second Army was not organized until July 1942." [p.84] [emphasis mine, again] In short, the 43 division plan used forces that did not exist.

Another important part is what the IJA actually thought of their ability to execute it. Namely, that they couldn't. To quote "Japanese Operational Planning against the USSR" at length:

"After a joint study with the War Ministry, [IGH] reached the conclusion that Concept B [of Hachi-go] could be carried out only if (1) certain railroads (sketch 9) were made operational, (2) about 200,000 motor vehicles were made ready and (3) a great quantity of war materiel were stockpiled in the Hailar Plain area. Moreover, IGH felt that these requirements could not be satisfied for the time being due to the general situation, especially as regards the national power of Japan and particularly its natural resources." [p.108]

Planning for Hachi-go had revealed other problems with Japanese assumptions. Under Concept B the Japanese had assumed that relatively small forces in northern Manchuria could sever the Trans-Siberian railroad and cut off forces in Ussuri. Soviet stockpiling of supplies in Ussuri, and the construction of a parallel rail line some 200km north of the Trans Siberian railroad rendered these assumptions void. [p.114] This meant more significant forces would have to be devoted to the north and east - forces the Japanese could not support - not and also launch a major offensive west. If the Japanese could not isolate Soviet forces in the east, the Japanese were faced with the very real possibility of the envelopment of their own forces rather than the enemy. [p.117]

The planners also noted that victory under Concept B would require the army to achieve motorization and mechanization which, as of the plan's inception, it had not done so. [pp.134-135] Similarly it would have to attain superior strength in the air so as to ensure air superiority. [p.135]

Support for Concept B completely evaporated after Nomonhan, which revealed the key assumptions of Soviet strength and mobility, and Japanese ability to conduct offensive actions to the west to be sharply at odds with reality.

"The battle at Nomonhan provided a clear picture of the scale and characteristics of operations on the vast wasteland of the Hailar Plain, and suggested that a large-scale modern war might be fought in that area in the future. Japan's limited national strength at that time, however, did not permit the build-up of an army, the development of munitions industries, and the execution of pre-war preparations in the field to the extent of meeting the requirements of Concept B of Operational Plan no. 8."
[p.136]

Furthermore, Japanese entry against the Soviets would hardly have doomed the Soviets. Defeat in the Far East in August-December of 1941 wouldn't have changed the Battle for Moscow, and the Japanese had no means to push further west against areas that would have actually mattered for the Soviet Union. The same barren terrain and limited lines of communication the Japanese were (rather blithely) counting on to prevent large scale Soviet responses would also have allowed relatively small Soviet blocking forces to prevent further movement west by the IJA. The Soviets could economize in forces in the area until they were ready to drive the Japanese out.

The loss of the Far East would have hardly costed the Soviets anything they needed for victory either. The loss of Vladivostok would have hurt, since half of all Lend Lease ran through that port - but the allies used Vladivostok so much because it was the safest route, as well as the closest to the American west coast. Had Vladivostok been closed they'd have delivered the cargo through the Indian ocean, or the northern route. Longer and more perilous, but the allies had a surfeit of transport.
You realize your entire point is only based in a world pre-Barbarossa right? By then the Far East forces were heavily drawn down and the Soviets had no ability to counterattack because of all of their combat capable formations being drawn Westward. If the Soviets were not at war with anyone else, such as in 1938-39 when the planning you're referring to was done, then that would be right, but the situation as of Autumn 1941 was drastically different and the Soviets were not at all able to resist even a limited Japanese invasion because of the major weakening of Soviet forces to support resistance against the Germans.

This entire passage is pretty irrelevant to discussing cutting of Vladivostok or phase 1 and 2 of the move north:
"The battle at Nomonhan provided a clear picture of the scale and characteristics of operations on the vast wasteland of the Hailar Plain, and suggested that a large-scale modern war might be fought in that area in the future. Japan's limited national strength at that time, however, did not permit the build-up of an army, the development of munitions industries, and the execution of pre-war preparations in the field to the extent of meeting the requirements of Concept B of Operational Plan no. 8." [p.136]
That was in Mongolia to the west, not in the East where the invasion in 1941 would have taken place and have been far more supportable as there was infrastructure there. All your references to Japanese needs to organize motorized supply only refer to operations in Mongolia not against Vladivostok, the initial target on the map I posted above.

Also you're completely wrong about the re-routing of LL, as Iran was not set up to receive major shipments until 1943 when the UK/US modernized and upgraded its infrastructure and Murmansk was largely topped and and its shipments mostly used to supply forces in the North, especially in 1941-42.

RUS-Far-Eastern-Republic-Map.jpg


This shows some more RRs:
Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria_%281945%29.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There own production

Domestic production of crude oil, at it's peak in 1941, was 1.9 million barrels. Consumption of that crude, based on the fall of stocks and factoring in imports and production, was nearly 20 million barrels a year. So basically Japan was unable to cover up the difference even with imports, completely imploding your idea that Japan could sustain itself on domestic production alone.

plus coal to oil conversion plants that they set up, IIRC with German help.
Resorting to outright dishonesty now, eh?:

They took the logical step of trying to establish a synthetic oil industry based on their sizable supplies of coal, but this effort failed because of a lack of technical expertise and shortages of alloying and catalytic metals for the synthetic oil plants.
You realize your entire point is only based in a world pre-Barbarossa right? By then the Far East forces were heavily drawn down and the Soviets had no ability to counterattack because of all of their combat capable formations being drawn Westward. If the Soviets were not at war with anyone else, such as in 1938-39 when the planning you're referring to was done, then that would be right, but the situation as of Autumn 1941 was drastically different and the Soviets were not at all able to resist even a limited Japanese invasion because of the major weakening of Soviet forces to support resistance against the Germans.
The Japanese disagreed. As the monograph Japanese Preparations For Operations in Manchuria (prior to 1943), which states:

"At the conference held on 9 August [1941] the Army and the Navy Departments of IGH decided to abandon hope for a favorable opportunity to exploit the situation in the north against the USSR, and to concentrate all efforts southward, regardless of any new developments in the German-Soviet war."

Barbarossa began on 22 June. The Japanese launched their Pacific offensive on 7 December. The decision was thus made after Germany invaded the USSR, but before the Japanese Empire became fully enmeshed in the Pacific. An ability to read calendar dates means that estimate of success was based on Japan and Germany against the USSR, and the Japanese didn't like the odds.

Also you're completely wrong about the re-routing of LL,
Not at all.

as Iran was not set up to receive major shipments until 1943 when the UK/US modernized and upgraded its infrastructure
Given that LL didn't start to matter until 1943, that is just as well. Incidentally, this is when the Pacific shipments also started to become a major factor.

and Murmansk was largely topped and its shipments mostly used to supply forces in the North, especially in 1941-42.
Where it's impact was utterly insignificant.
 
Last edited:
Top