"A Very British Transition" - A Post-Junta Britain TL

Chapter 24: Accession
1627038649461.png

Six new flags were raised outside the commission building

“On 1 January 2007 the EU welcomed six new Member States and over 100 million people to the European Union. This completes the EU's historic four rounds of enlargement reuniting Europe after decades of division. To mark this important day President of the Commission, Margo Wallstrom said: “The 1 January 2007 is a historic day to celebrate. I congratulate the people and leaders of our new members for the courage, determination, and work in preparing for membership. I thank the people and the leaders of the EU for their vision in supporting this project. I also welcome the six new Commissioners, I look forward to working with them.” Enlargement Commissioner Günter Verheugen added: "My warm welcome to the people of our new member states." - Six new members join the EU family, EU Commission Press Release (2007)


On new year's day 2007, The United Kingdom joined the EU. Several thousand British citizens emigrated on the first day alone, many of them younger folk moving for study or graduate jobs, and many of the other medical professionals lured by the promise of a better life on the continent. Whilst there weren’t cataclysmic scenes at the banks like some feared, there were a flood of last-minute panic withdrawals as people switched their pound notes for Euros. The EU was raised in London, and the Union Flag was hoisted outside the EU building in Brussels. Britain was now officially in Europe, and Britain was now legally the EU’s problem.

Things got off to a rocky start when the EU announced they were raising inflation rates by 0.5%, the sudden flood of Euros needed to sustain new members, as well as the deteriorating global economy meant inflationary actions had to be taken. This didn’t set a brilliant opening tone for a country that had crawled into the EU for the very promise of economic salvation. For those who hoped accession would solve Britain’s financial woes, they were found very much wrong, many miles of hard work still lay ahead for the treasury if Britain was to ever recover.

Nor did EU membership fix Britain’s internal woes. The Peace Pledge Union was an organisation of secular pacifists set up in the 1930s, whilst they faced brutal repression under the Junta they had survived until present day, now they campaigned for justice and reconciliation in the transition and an end to Britain’s military industrial complex. For the last several weeks the PPU had set up camp around MoD Donnington, near Telford. Donnington remained one of Britain’s largest arsenals, storing much of the military’s equipment. A lot of this equipment mysteriously found its way onto the international black market during the dying days of the Junta years, with the base’s management famously corrupt.

1627038343023.png

Suprise military "exercises" were still common place

“Many attribute the British Military to the "manifest destiny" model of political militaries. This model conceptualises that military officials consider themselves superior to civilians as the only savior of the nation. Under this model, the military justifies intervention on the basis that civilian regimes suffer from mal-administration. They believe it is only the military that can protect and defend the national interest. Another interpretation is the corporatist model. According to this model, the military is a corporate entity. This means that military individuals have collective tendencies and a singleness of purpose. The armed forces consider themselves different from civilians. Such a perception on the part of the military represents the conduct of civil-military relations as a zero-sum game.”
- Corruption and the Military in Politics, Lecture by Muhammad Majeed, University of Glasgow

The PPU camp called for the base to be closed and the weapons within destroyed. The Donnington situation would come to a boiling point when a young activist attempted to climb the chain-link fence surrounding the base and hang a banner. The facility’s guards opened fire at the activist, killing him and injuring seven others. The young man’s name was Kareem Dennis, a young rapper from London, he was just 20 years old. Now usually a soldier firing into an unarmed crowd and killing a 20-year-old would be swept under the rug, no longer was this the case. Now came the question of what to do with the soldier who shot Dennis.

1627038792344.png

Dennis, known better by his rap handle "Lowkey" was a major figure in the anti-military movement

Luckily for “Soldier A” as the court case called him, he had friends in high places. Several leading military officers, both serving and former lept to the defence of Soldier A, arguing he had acted in self-defence and the PPU activists were attempting to storm the armory. One of his loudest supporters was former Minister of Labour General Jonathon Riley who declared Soldier A’s prosecution was an “attack on all servicemen''. Privately Defence Secretary Charles Guthrie warned Justice Secretary David Miliband not to prosecute Soldier A, warning the military was a powder keg waiting to go off. Nonetheless, Soldier A had to be held accountable for his actions.

After a several-month-long court-martial with strong civilian oversight from the MOJ, Soldier A was convicted, his name was revealed as Jonny Banks. However, Banks’ conviction pleased no one. Banks was convicted of manslaughter, and sentenced to only four years in prison, the minimum manslaughter sentence under British law. Banks’ conviction had been the most expensive and high profile court-martial in British history, behind the scenes it was a tug of war between the Ministry of Defence, unwilling to throw one of their own to the wolves, and the Ministry of Justice, eager to see Banks in prison.

The high-level intervention from Guthrie and other senior military officials was reported on by the progressive press, whilst the Junta was no longer in charge, the military could still tip the scales whenever they wanted and the MoD was still far too powerful. Protesters on both sides, backed up by paramilitaries from the Red Brigades and Civil Assistance, immediately burst into violence again outside Bulford Camp where the court-martial was held. The base had to be locked down and armed riot police had to be dispatched to separate the crowds and calm them down. Not only did the Banks’ court-martial agitate the military, it also greatly harmed the reputation of the British justice system. It was not the first time military crimes had been left off leniently.

“Colonel Peter Oliver, had been standing trial for two years for negligently performing a duty. But a judge yesterday ruled that there was no case to answer, as charges against Col Oliver and five of his men were abandoned. It came on the 600th day of the trial, which army sources say will cost the taxpayer over 30 million. Col Oliver's men had been accused of mistreating civilians detained during the occupation of Glasgow in the 2003 General Strike. It was alleged that some of the colonel's men abused detainees. This included keeping them hooded and deprived of sleep, - interrogation "conditioning", banned under international law. One of the prisoners, John Glen, 26, a hotel receptionist, died. The prosecution had alleged that Col Oliver did not ensure the detainees were treated according to international law.” - Judge orders charges dropped against six soldiers accused of abuses, The Scotsman (2007)

1627038539464.png

Many officers avoided justice for crimes commited during the fall of the Junta
 
Last edited:
As for the treatment of immigrants not great, Enoch Powell played a large part in the Junta so Powellite policies towards ethnic minorities were common,
Considering his principles OTL, it is extremely unlikely that Enoch Powell would support an undemocratic junta in the UK in any shape or form.
To give you an idea, he refused to join the orange order when he became a UUP member and MP. He was also opposed to European integration as he saw it as a threat to UK Parliamentary sovereignty.

Enoch Powell is a very complicated character. It is an oversimplification to only see him through the lenses of the Rivers of Blood speech. He was undoutedly right wing, but not a friend of the establishment and made many ennemies OTL because he was so principled.

Enoch Powell would likely be a staunch junta opponent TTL.
 
Considering his principles OTL, it is extremely unlikely that Enoch Powell would support an undemocratic junta in the UK in any shape or form.
To give you an idea, he refused to join the orange order when he became a UUP member and MP. He was also opposed to European integration as he saw it as a threat to UK Parliamentary sovereignty.

Enoch Powell is a very complicated character. It is an oversimplification to only see him through the lenses of the Rivers of Blood speech. He was undoutedly right wing, but not a friend of the establishment and made many ennemies OTL because he was so principled.

Enoch Powell would likely be a staunch junta opponent TTL.

This is fair but I'd also point out Powell was a authoritarian military man, strongly anti-socialist and had a powerful following.

However I do accept your points Dunois and I'm glad you've raised them but I'd rather not get into a debate around Powell as that tend to attract the bad eggs - and then bad eggs attract the admins :)
 
What kind of voting system does the UK use these days? Are they still on FPTP or did they change it?
The House of Commons is composed of 497 members elected by universal adult suffrage for a four-year term of office. Each one of Britain's 40 provinces is a constituency entitled to an initial minimum of three seats. The remaining 377 seats are allocated among the forty provinces in proportion to their populations. Parties, federations and coalitions may present candidates or lists of candidates. The lists are closed, so electors may not choose individual candidates in or alter the order of such lists. Electors cast a ballot for a single list.

The seats in each constituency are apportioned according to the d'hondt method. There is no official electoral threshold, but since each seat has an average of 10-12 members, the defacto electoral threshold is fairly high as parties must get 8-10% of the vote in a constituency to make it into Parliament. So whilst it is a PR system it is construed to produce strong results for the two major parties.
 
The House of Commons is composed of 497 members elected by universal adult suffrage for a four-year term of office. Each one of Britain's 40 provinces is a constituency entitled to an initial minimum of three seats. The remaining 377 seats are allocated among the forty provinces in proportion to their populations. Parties, federations and coalitions may present candidates or lists of candidates. The lists are closed, so electors may not choose individual candidates in or alter the order of such lists. Electors cast a ballot for a single list.

The seats in each constituency are apportioned according to the d'hondt method. There is no official electoral threshold, but since each seat has an average of 10-12 members, the defacto electoral threshold is fairly high as parties must get 8-10% of the vote in a constituency to make it into Parliament. So whilst it is a PR system it is construed to produce strong results for the two major parties.
Ah, alright. On that note, will we ever get a look at what the provinces of the UK are?
 
Loved the latest update, it really fleshes out UK society ITTL. I think (being academics) if my parents hadn't emigrated before this point they certainly would have done so now.

Good to see the Peace Pledge Union mentioned, I was a member for a while but they're very London-focused so eventually I let my membership expire. In OTL there was a lot of activism in Scotland around Faslane, the Peace Camp is still there and is an amazing place. Any chance of an update that mentions what happened there? It's a seminal piece of history for the Scottish left.

I'm guessing the vigil for a Scottish parliament wasn't tolerated in this TL? Again, that's another incredibly important piece of Scottish history. I had a friend whose dad was a poet and ran a bookshop, he held Democracy for Scotland meetings in his shop after hours. When I was a kid I'd go round and visit and he had pictures of Tommy Sheridan and Winnie Ewing in his shop up on his walls.

 
Ah, alright. On that note, will we ever get a look at what the provinces of the UK are?

If it's useful, here is what the provincial apportionment might look like (population figures are from 2005, though numbers from Scotland are ad hoc estimates)
ProvinceSeats
Bedfordshire
13​
Berkshire
16​
Cheshire
9​
Cornwall
6​
Cumbria
6​
Derbyshire
16​
Devon
10​
Dorset
11​
East Anglia
17​
East Wales
10​
East Yorkshire
9​
Eastern Scotland
15​
Essex
13​
Gloucestershire
17​
Greater Manchester
19​
Hampshire
14​
Herefordshire
11​
Highlands and Islands
6​
Inner London - East
15​
Inner London - West
10​
Kent
13​
Lancashire
12​
Leicestershire
13​
Lincolnshire
7​
Merseyside
12​
North Eastern Scotland
6​
North Yorkshire
8​
Northern Ireland
14​
Northumberland
12​
Outer London - East
13​
Outer London - South
10​
Outer London - West
14​
Shropshire
13​
South Western Scotland
17​
South Yorkshire
11​
Surrey
19​
Tees Valley
10​
West Midlands (County)
19​
West Wales
15​
West Yorkshire
16​
Here's a list of the provinces and their MPs, very kindly created by @Gust
 
Loved the latest update, it really fleshes out UK society ITTL. I think (being academics) if my parents hadn't emigrated before this point they certainly would have done so now.

Good to see the Peace Pledge Union mentioned, I was a member for a while but they're very London-focused so eventually I let my membership expire. In OTL there was a lot of activism in Scotland around Faslane, the Peace Camp is still there and is an amazing place. Any chance of an update that mentions what happened there? It's a seminal piece of history for the Scottish left.

I'm guessing the vigil for a Scottish parliament wasn't tolerated in this TL? Again, that's another incredibly important piece of Scottish history. I had a friend whose dad was a poet and ran a bookshop, he held Democracy for Scotland meetings in his shop after hours. When I was a kid I'd go round and visit and he had pictures of Tommy Sheridan and Winnie Ewing in his shop up on his walls.

Scottish (presumably left wing and pro-independence) academics? They'd be long gone!

The Faslane camp was broken up by the Junta and many of its members were arrested, there are those trying to reestablish the camp now democracy has been restored but it's not as influential in OTL

The vigil didn't happen per say as there wasn't even an independent democratic British Parliament, by the 90s most Scots were either separatists or loyalists, there we very few devolutionists/federalists like we see OTL. There were several Scottish civil rights marches organised by the SNP and other underground peaceful separatist organisations but these were always brutally cracked down on.

One notable march which is probably closest to the vigil was the "Battle of Calton Hill", in the late 1980s where police charged peaceful protesters demonstrating at Calton Hill in Edinburgh, over 200 were injured. Scotland was also occupied for most of it's history Operation Banner Style, with pro-SNLA cities like Glasgow suffering heavily.
 
Last edited:
What did the US think of the UK joining the EU?

Are there many private military or security companies employing formet British military and police members and armed with military 'surplus'?
 
What did the US think of the UK joining the EU?

Are there many private military or security companies employing formet British military and police members and armed with military 'surplus'?
The US is generally supportive. With the end of the Cold War the British Junta became an embarrassment more than anything, so their glad Britain's been brought back into the EU/NATO fold.

Yes absolutely, several former officers have set up private military contractors. Developing countries especially have seen a glut of British equipment and former service-people.
 
Chapter 25: The Spy Who Hated Me
1627300008338.png

Britian's Secret Service was about to be shoved into the spotlight

“Did Sir Richard Dearlove know when he was appointed head of the Security Service in 1998 he would be the last Junta Intelligence Chief? A political survivor, Dearlove is one of the few senior Junta officials still in place. His appointment was a reflection of the agency's post-Cold War priorities - fighting dissidents rather than the Soviets. Chosen by the First Lord, Peter Hill-Norton, Sir Richard took the classic route into the espionage business. He began his MI6 career in 1966 and two years later received his first overseas posting to the Kenyan capital, Nairobi. He returned to the UK in 1992 as director of operations. In 1999 Sir Richard was appointed chief and became known in Whitehall as "C". A year later he survived an SNLA rocket attack on The Security Service's headquarters on the south bank of the River Thames.”
- Profile: Sir Richard Dearlove, BBC News (2007)

Security Services Director Richard Dearlove was not a fan of the new order. Under the Junta MI5, MI6 and the Civil Guard had been merged into one overarching Security Service, with a single Director General at its head. The Security Services had gone on to be one of the most internally powerful secret services in the world. So much so that even after the fall of the Junta, Director Dearlove was allowed to stay on, and any attempts to break up the Security Services were foiled. Even in the transition, the Security Services kept their political power and there was a huge amount of distrust between the Services and the new SDP Government. Former Home Secretary Peter Tatchell had routinely complained of having his hands tied by intransigent officials at the Home Office and the Services.

1627300143918.png

Former Home Secretary Tatchell had warned of the Service's growing power

Many of these fears would be proven correct when a series of leaks from inside the Services revealed agents had wiretapped the phones of elected politicians without their consent. Among those who were hacked included Prime Minister Alan Johnson, Socialist Alternative Leader John McDonnell, and both SDP Home Secretaries: Peter Tatchell and Charlie Falconer. Even some reformists in National such as Shadow Chancellor Nick Clegg had their phones hacked in a brazen violation of personal privacy. Those in civil society had been spied on too, from trade union barons to journalists and even celebrities. The Security Services had been caught red-handed, playing the old tricks of the Junta and using their political power to spy on those considered enemies.

An outcry amongst the political class and the public demanded action. At its most extreme end, the Socialist Alternative wanted the Security Services dissolved and Dearlove placed under arrest. Marches against the Security Service’s power took place in London as pressure built on Britain’s intelligence community. The Johnson administration acted quickly, Solicitor General Sadiq Khan (deputy to Attorney General Patricia Scotland) was appointed to head up a new inquiry, the Khan Inquiry, to investigate the extent of the wire-tapping scandal and a broader investigation into the powers of the Security Service and the legal basis for these powers.

“A British public defender has accused the Security Services of "smearing" him after the Security Services accused him of spying. CNN has learned that accusations aimed at Sadiq Khan QC led to him being blacklisted from practicing the law for four years. He was suspended amid allegations of threatening national security. The Security Services bugged his phones and investigated his bank accounts. The Security Services claimed Khan was an agent of influence for the Pakistani government. Sources say the Services based its warning on the Khan's association with people from the Pakistani embassy and nationals. Khan, who remains blacklisted, now runs an organisation of anti-Junta lawyers in South London. His parents emigrated from Pakistan. He did not know that a career-destroying allegation had come from the Security Services.” - The Story of a British Lawyer Hounded by the Junta, CNN (2002)

1627299904853.png

Khan was already an enemy of the Security Services, he would pull no punches

Khan was a popular choice amongst the SDP, a former public defender during the Junta days Khan had made a name for himself as a thorn in the side of the Junta’s conservative legal system, frequently representing Scottish dissidents, downtrodden Muslims, and other people on the edges of Junta society. Khan had eventually been blacklisted by the Junta and had been smeared as an Iranian spy. After the return of democracy, at just 37 years old Khan had risen quickly to become one of Britain’s most senior legal professionals. For those in the Security Services Khan possessed an existential threat and was unlikely to be lenient with the Intelligence Community. In Thames House, backrooms elements of the Services began work to discredit Khan and crush his investigation.

Over the next few weeks on the inquiry, several of Khan’s personal emails were mysteriously leaked, and in right-leaning papers, stories surfaced of Khan defending Islamic extremists such as Louis Farrakhan and Maajid Nawaz. Several private conversations between Khan and Attorney General Patricia Scotland were also leaked, with Khan alleging the Security Services had bugged his Whitehall Office. Despite this Khan’s investigation plowed on, interviewing operatives and collating evidence, one of the most shocking discoveries of Khan’s investigation was that a Senior Downing Street aide William Lewis was an active Security Services asset and had been relaying confidential meetings back to Thames House.

After several months the Khan inquiry concluded, unsurprisingly the inquiry found the Security Services had massively overstepped their remit and interfered in the political process in direct violation of the Cardiff Accords. Khan’s recommendations included breaking up the Security Services back into domestic and international intelligence agencies similar to the old MI5/MI6 divide. The inquiry also recommended transferring counter-terrorism powers and control over counter-terror policing directly to the Home Office, finally and most controversially, the inquiry called for the immediate resignation of Director General Richard Dearlove.

This is where things became complicated. The Military was up in arms around investigations to their intelligence brothers. Defence Secretary Charles Guthrie was a close personal friend of Dearlove and warned of “dramatic consequences” should Dearlove's “outstanding counter-terrorism knowledge and experience” be removed from the equation. With a divided Parliament and economic issues on the horizon, Johnson couldn’t afford a direct confrontation with the Security Services. Several in National and on the right of the SDP had been heavily critical of the administration for “going after” the intelligence community; if Johnson overplayed his hand and failed to dislodge Dearlove, he would make a powerful enemy for very little gain.

“Anyone who wanted to hear about the Security Services' politician spying program could have spent Thursday putting up shelves. Disclosures were not on the agenda. Instead, the heads of the service spent a couple of hours, courtesy of Westminster's Intelligence Committee, explaining that we shouldn't want to know such things. It was an advert for the spooks' high opinion of themselves and their work. Three middle-aged white men emerged from what one called the "ring of secrecy" to argue for the preservation of the ring against scrutiny. The Security Services' Richard Dearlove was less grilled than warmed-over by Des Browne's committee. Proper evidence, the TV audience was told, would only be revealed in private sessions with Solicitor General Sadiq Khan.” - Three wise men of our intelligence agencies spin a yarn, Ian Bell, The Scotsman (2007)

1627299970815.png

Dearlove was too powerful to shoot and miss
 
Wikibox: Sadiq Khan
1627313035291.png

Sadiq Aman Khan (born 8 October 1970) is a British politician serving as Solicitor General since 2005. He has also served as Member of Parliament (MP) for Inner West London since 2005. A member of the SDP Khan is a support of the party's traditionalist tendency

Born in Tooting, South London, to a working-class British Pakistani family, Khan earned a law degree from the University of North London. He worked as a solicitor specialising in human rights issues and served as a public defender. In 1998 Khan was stripped from the bar and blacklisted by the Department of Justice for supporting seditious elements. This was overturned in 2005. Khan chaired the London branch of the Democratic Lawyers Association (DLA) for seven years, a pressure group of anti-Junta legal officials. After the fall of the Junta in 2005 Khan joined the SDP and was elected MP for Inner West London. He was supportive of Prime Minister Alan Johnson and appointed Solicitor General in the First Johnson Cabinet.

After the 2007 wiretapping scandal, Home Secretary Charlie Falconer appointed Khan to head up an inquiry investigating the powers of the Security Services. Khan came under heavy criticism for this inquiry. His office was bugged and his emails were leaked at several points. At the end of the inquiry, Khan recommended the Security Services be broken up and Director-General Richard Dearlove resign

Khan has been included in the Time 100 list of most influential people in Britain. Khan has been praised for making Britain's justice system more accessible and for defending human rights. But, he has been criticised for the rise of gun crime in Britain and his response.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, events are starting to build to a head. Either the PM or someone puts a leash back on the military/security services, or the public vote in someone who will.
 
I fear a backlash. The typical five-year term of the British House of Commons means the next election would be in 2010 but in the first UK Election Wikibox the date is 2009 meaning something will prompt an earlier election. Probably Socialist Alternative is going to collapse and fracture arguing on the support to the not enough reformist SDP government, causing a political crisis after many headaches. The trend seems suggest a gradual growth of the SDP’s right wing within the party against leftwingers and unions best efforts and this too could prompt major clashes with the SA. An other worrying trend is the progressive people’s disillusionment with democracy, a common line in many post-dictatorship states: so much enthusiasm about the democratic transformation makes people confounding the political problems with the social ones and thinking a political change will mean a social-economic one.
With crime and paramilitary causing growing violence in UK and separatists agitating from Belfast to Aberdeen, people are just realising as the democratic turning has not solved their problems. Disputes about public housing, mind draining from EU and not controlled immigration are mounting too. The comeback of Nationals in EU Election is a sign of that. Considering that in 2007-2008 the economic recession will start to hit people just while Johnson Government will launch new privatisations to save the face with EU and the picture will start form. Economic problems and clashes will translate in frictions with SA and ultimately will bring down the government. Yeah, clashing with military and secret services is a good way to remember the public that Alan Johnson is the British Democracy Man and the Nationals the bad Junta boys (especially if leader by Collins, the last Junta’s Prime Minister) but it will win many enemies too. Also the coincidence of the next general election with the European vote would favour the National Party. De facto the only issue is Collins’s leadership: if he will make some missteps or appears to much in line with SDP on Europe or economics the party could think to replace him to avoid the Collins=Junta problem and Collins could accept for the party unity’s sake. In this case Theresa May seems the best positioned to replace him, assuring a new face to the dominant moderate faction appeasing the hardliners and realising her dream of becoming the first woman Prime Minister.
 
Chapter 26: Big Brother
1627399715353.png

Johnson had to strike a careful balance between getting a leash on the security services and being perceived as weak on crime

“I am today announcing Machinery of Government changes to the Home Office and the Security Service. These changes build on the 'Security and Justice' inquiry by Sadiq Khan which sets out the Government's security policy. We will tackle the threat posed by terrorism by creating a new intelligence agency focused solely on domestic terrorism. The Centre for Organised Crime and Terrorism Intelligence or COCTI. The security and counter-terrorism changes will have immediate effect. Alongside this, a new Centre for National Intelligence (CNI) will be established, with lead responsibility for international intelligence. Finally, counter-terror policing powers will be transferred to the Home Office. The Security Service as an organisation will be disbanded. This change will take effect from May 9.”
- Speech by Home Secretary Charlie Falconer (2007)

After a several hours long Cabinet meeting, Home Secretary Charlie Falconer made a statement to the public. The Security Services would be split into two separate organisations, the Centre for National Intelligence (CNI) would form the main organisation for foreign intelligence and the Centre for Organised Crime and Terrorism Intelligence (COCTI) would handle domestic intelligence. Counter-terrorism police would no longer be directly overseen by the intelligence agencies, instead, it would be transferred to the Home Office and police. However, most controversially, Sir Richard Dearlove would remain in place as Director of the CNI. Falconer argued Dearlove’s expertise was too valuable to lose in such a volatile period.

The administration hoped that by confining Dearlove to international affairs they could prevent him from interfering in domestic politics, whilst still keeping Britain’s intelligence community on side. Johnson had opted to try and clip Dearlove’s wings, rather than make peace or remove him from the board entirely. This decision pleased few people, those within the SDP’s right and National saw breaking up the Security Services as weakening Britain, meanwhile, the SA and the political left were outraged that Dearlove wasn’t in prison and had even managed to keep his job. Johnson was walking a difficult tightrope, by keeping everyone unhappy he had managed to preserve both democracy and his authority but his backbenchers were becoming increasingly angry.

The military too was angry, there had long been a close brotherhood between the intelligence community and the military. Defence Secretary Charles Guthrie was a close friend of Dearlove. In an attempt to keep the military on side and prove to voters he wasn’t weak on terror, Johnson gave Guthrie permission to send a further thousand British troops to Afghanistan to assist in joint counter-terrorism missions. Foreign Secretary Tony Blair was greatly supportive of this measure, as were Britain’s allies in the States. Now the UK had ascended back to the NATO/EU liberal international order, Johnson was eager to prove Britain would remain a reliable international partner to democracy.

“Terrorist groups including al Qaeda operate in Afghanistan. The country is the source of 95% of the heroin in the UK. The Afghan state remains very fragile, with limited control of territory, and the Taliban’s insurgency continues. Afghanistan remains a priority for the Government. The UK Government continues to focus on counter-terrorism as a primary security aim in Afghanistan. Regional stability is interconnected with reducing the threat from terrorism and illicit economies. Conflict in Afghanistan, allows serious organised crime to continue. Afghanistan remains the world’s largest producer of opiates and 95% of the heroin in the UK originates from Afghanistan. The significant increase in Methamphetamine production in Afghanistan is cause for concern.” - Defence Ministry Report (2007)

1627399507064.png

Drugs from Afghanistan were unexplainably making their way to the UK

Foreign Secretary Blair travelled to Afghanistan personally to oversee the troops arriving and to meet Afghan officials. Little did he know this would be the last trip he made as Foreign Secretary. Whether as a revenge move by rogue intelligence agencies or just some clever journalism, several choice recordings made their way to the press. The recordings showed Blair as well as Development Secretary Jack Straw taking bribes from senior businessmen of up to 80,000 euros in return for access to key government figures. Whilst the SDP had avoided a coup, they instead saw a good old fashioned corruption scandal.

Of course, corruption was nothing new to Britain, the Junta had been famously corrupt, senior military officials and civil servants lived in luxury through generous “gifts” from the business world. This corruption was particularly strong in the military, where surplus gear would mysteriously find its way to international dictators, warlords and rebel groups. But the SDP was meant to be the good guys, the saviours of democracy, whiter than white. Both Blair and Straw had to go.

1627399825028.png

Some in the SA wanted Blair and Straw to face prosecution, but Johnson left it at resignation

Whilst this was never proven the leak was likely a set up by Security Service agents, the businessmen in the recordings were never discovered, and the organisations they claimed to represent didn’t exist, nonetheless they were able to produce hundreds of thousands of euros in cash. The Guardian simply didn’t have the money for this kind of string operation, but the Intelligence Agencies did, in the end, Dearlove had the last laugh. The scandal would also hurt Johnson’s ability to control his caucus. Blair and Straw were both leading lights in the liberal right-wing of the SDP, with the SDP right already agitated by frequent terror attacks, Johnson couldn’t afford to lose Blair. But lose him he did, as he reshuffled his Cabinet for the third time in two years.

Johnson Cabinet 2007-
  • Prime Minister - Alan Johnson (SDP)
  • Deputy Prime Minister - Alan Milburn (SDP)
  • Chancellor of the Exchequer - Simon Hughes (SDP)
  • Foreign Secretary - Rosie Boycott (SDP)
  • Justice Secretary - David Miliband (SDP)
  • Defence Secretary - Field Marshal Charles Guthrie (Military)
  • Home Secretary - Charlie Falconer (SDP)
  • Development Secretary - Chris Huhne (SDP)
  • Education Secretary - John Reid (SDP)
  • Industry, Tourism and Trade Secretary - Patricia Hewitt (SDP)
  • Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Secretary - Glenda Jackson (SDP)
  • Public Administrations Secretary - Peter Hain (SDP)
  • Culture Secretary - Susan Kramer (SDP)
  • Health Secretary - Charles Kennedy (SDP)
  • Environment Secretary - Valerie Amos (SDP)
  • Housing Secretary - Polly Toynbee (SDP)
“Alan Johnson today appointed Britain's first female Foreign Secretary as he unveiled a shake-up of his frontbench team. Rosie Boycott, the former Education Secretary, will take charge of the Foreign Office in a wide-ranging reshuffle. Tony Blair, the former Foreign Secretary, was the most high-profile casualty. In a surprise move, Patricia Hewitt, a junior Health Minister, received a cabinet appointment as Industry Secretary. Former Industry Secretary Chris Huhne was confirmed as Straw's replacement as Development Secretary. Charles Kennedy, a junior Industry Minister, was promoted to secretary of state for Health. John Reid - Mr Johnson's close political ally - was promoted to Secretary of State for Education.” - Johnson appoints first female Forigen Secretary, Associated Press (2007)

1627399617776.png

Feminist activist Rosie Boycott had seen a rapid rise under the Johnson administration
 
With intelligence distracted, Johnson can now concentrate on the economy and crime. The issue is that there will be a global recession in the upcoming year and that definitely isn't going to help the economy.
Maybe the isolated nature of the British economy may mitigate some of the disastrous effects, but the PM needs to get creative to avoid a coup, vote of no confidence and most importantly, win the election in 2009.
 
Top