Kennedy's domestic agenda, Supreme Court vacany, Latin American Liberation Front, & US Steel
An update on Kennedy’s domestic agenda
“If consumers are offered inferior products, if prices are exorbitant, if drugs are unsafe or worthless, if the consumer is unable to choose on an informed basis, then his dollar is wasted, his health and safety may be threatened, and the national interest suffers.”
-- John F. Kennedy’s speech on the rights of the consumer
On March 20th, 1962, John F. Kennedy presented to the Congress what would become the Consumer Bill of Rights – four basic principles that should be guaranteed to all consumers in the United States.
These were:
The right to safety - To be protected against products, production processes and services which are hazardous to health or life.
The right to be informed - To be given facts needed to make an informed choice, and to be protected against dishonest or misleading advertising or labelling.
The right to choose - To be able to select from a range of products and services, offered at competitive prices with an assurance of satisfactory quality.
The right to be heard - To have consumer interests represented in the making and execution of government policy, and in the development of products and services.
In making this speech, Kennedy hoped to spur progress on his campaign promise to act on the side of consumers.
Kennedy’s domestic agenda had been decent but fell below the high expectations set out by his rhetoric.
The Department of Housing and Urban Affairs had been operating for some months under Secretary Cutrer. Since that time, the new department had put considerable effort into urban revitalization, slum clearance, and seeing low-income families into new homes.
At the conclusion of 1962, Kennedy considered pursing legislation to create Department of Transportation but felt that Congress would not approve of a second new department so soon.
However, there was one element of domestic policy that the President knew would have universal support – aiding American war veterans who would soon be returning from Cuba. This would be a major focus on Kennedy’s domestic agenda in 1962, given the success of the GI Bill since it’s inception in 1944.
In particular, the visibility of black war heroes in Cuba – James Hendrix, Colin Powell, Eugene Ashley Jr., Matthew Leonard, William Maud Bryant, Webster Anderson and others – gave Kennedy hope that future legislation aiding America’s veterans would see equal benefits given to African American soldiers.
Kennedy reached out to the Vice President, who had become one of his key advisors concerning issues of civil rights, for his thoughts:
PRESIDENT KENNEDY: Good afternoon, Stu.
VICE PRESIDENT SYMINGTON: Good afternoon, Mr President.
PRESIDENT KENNEDY: I uh…wanted to confer with you over some of the administration’s ideas on veterans.
VICE PRESIDENT SYMINGTON: Mhm. With them coming back from Cuba, we’re gonna have broad support on this.
PRESIDENT KENNEDY: Well yes. Some of us here – Bobby especially – were thinking of how we could highlight negro war veterans – highlight their experiences and make sure they benefit from the new GI Bill or whatever action is taken by the Congress.
VICE PRESIDENT SYMINGTON: We could very well get two birds with one stone here – act on civil rights and veterans in one swoop. That’ll make it harder for the Southern lobby to oppose it.
PRESIDENT KENNEDY: Exactly right. Talk to King about that march he’s planning, see if he can’t invite veterans returning from Cuba. It gives the whole thing legitimacy. Not just blacks, but whites too if they’re interested.
VICE PRESIDENT SYMINGTON: I’ll see to it.
PRESIDENT KENNEDY: Excellent. Thank you.
-- A phone conversation recorded between President Kennedy and Vice President Symington, March 25, 1962
The interplay between civil rights and the War in Cuba was about to come home to the shores of the United States. Kennedy hoped he could use it to his advantage.
A vacancy on the Supreme Court
On March 31st, 1962, Associate Justice Charles Evans Whittaker retired from the Supreme Court, following a nervous breakdown during Baker v. Carr case.This gave Kennedy an open seat on the Supreme Court.
Kennedy’s first choice to fill the seat was William H. Hastie, an African American judge who had served on the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit since 1949.
The President, and his brother Bobby, were especially adamant on Hastie, due to the disappointment felt by civil rights activists that Robert Waver was not appointed to lead the new housing department.
Opposition from Chief Justice Earl Warren, who claimed that Hastie was “not a liberal” did little to ease Kennedy’s commitment to Hastie, who he had met and personally found intelligent and engaging.
It was decided – Kennedy would nominate go on to nominate William H. Hastie for a position on the Supreme Court, three days later.
Predictably, the southern wing of the Democratic Party objected to Hastie. Senator James Eastland of Mississippi, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, led the charge against the man hoping to become the first African American Supreme Court Justice.
President Kennedy knew it would be a fight to see the nomination succeed, but it was one he was willing to have.
The Latin American Liberation Front
Moving into April, the hunt for Che Guevara was well under way.While Kennedy had deployed additional troops into Panama, many conducting the search had been shipped straight from Cuba to Panama.
As American presence in Panama increased, so too did the frequency of terrorist attacks in the Panama Canal Zone. Buildings were bombed, shootings took place and US soldiers were lured into dark corners by women, only to be stabbed to death by waiting assassins.
As well as this, there were reports of Panamanian National Police defections to Che Guevara’s newly formed terrorist group - the Latin American Liberation Front
In Guevara’s own words, the Latin American Liberation Front (LALF) was an organization that “transcended traditional ethnic and national boundaries” and was based around “freedom and revolution for all people in Latin America” as well as “solidarity against the oppressive forces of colonialism and imperialism”.
As first, it appeared that the LALF’s influence was limited only to Panama and a small number of sympathizers in Colombia.
This changed on April 8th, 1962, with the assassination of John O. Bell, US Ambassador to Guatemala.
Bell was shot and killed less than a block from the US Embassy. Members of the Guatemalan military tasked with protecting Bell shot and killed his assassin, but his death demonstrated the danger of Latin American guerrilla movements.
American intelligence services ascertained that Che had made contact with FAR, a Guatemalan guerrilla organization that had been formed in 1960 and orchestrated the attack as a show of force.
Kennedy condemned the attack in a speech the next day, stating that the United States would never bow to terror and aggression, and that those responsible would be brought to justice by the United States and their allies.
One thing was clear – Guevara was not to be underestimated.
John F. Kennedy vs Big Steel
On April 10, 1962, a major showdown between John F. Kennedy and U.S. Steel was set into motion.After negotiation with America’s largest steel producing firms which concluded the previous month, it had been agreed to that workers would see an increase in fringe benefits worth 10 cents an hour, but no wage hikes in 1962. Inversely, it was implicit that companies would not raise prices.
Such measures would prevent inflation, Kennedy stated.
However, the 10th of April saw Roger Blough, CEO of U.S. Steel, renege on the deal that was made. He told Kennedy he and other steel companies were hiking the price of steel by 3.5%.
Kennedy’s anger, both publicly and privately, was palpable.
At a news conference the next day, Kennedy did not hold back his criticisms:
“Good afternoon. I have several announcements to make.
Simultaneous and identical actions of United States Steel and other leading steel corporations, increasing steel prices by some 6 dollars a ton, constitute a wholly unjustifiable and irresponsible defiance of the public interest.
In this serious hour in our nation's history, when we are confronted with grave crises in Berlin, Cuba, Panama, and Southeast Asia, when we are devoting our energies to economic recovery and stability, when we are asking Reservists to leave their homes and families for months on end, and servicemen to risk their lives -- and four were killed in the last two days in Vietnam, while have six died in Panama -- and asking union members to hold down their wage requests, at a time when restraint and sacrifice are being asked of every citizen, the American people will find it hard, as I do, to accept a situation in which a tiny handful of steel executives whose pursuit of private power and profit exceeds their sense of public responsibility can show such utter contempt for the interests of 185 million Americans.”
-- President Kennedy at a news conference, April 11, 1962
Kennedy would say to advisors:
"My father always told me that all businessmen were sons of bitches, but I never believed it until now."
The line would quickly become public, much to the dismay of the business community and amusement of trade unionists and liberal activists.
Many steel firms agreed to increase prices alongside US Steel, but two major ones - Inland and Kaiser – refused.
The Defense Department, led by policy veteran Paul Nitze, planned to shift the contract for producing American submarines to smaller steel firms and those who refused to lift prices.
Ultimately, this threat forced US Steel and those who followed them to cave in – the plan to increase the price of steel was abandoned.
Kennedy had faced down the corporate might of the steel industry and come out on top.
Last edited: