A Thunderbolt From Asia: a Byzantino-Anatolian Saga



A Thunderbolt From Asia: a Byzantino-Anatolian Saga

"Our Emperor John looked grave and solemn upon hearing the accounts of the Turk. He was gracious and wise to give him and his compatriots lodgings, for they had traveled much and appeared to have endured yet more. The man, who was pale and wrung his hands in a nervous manner, told all of how a horde of horsemen from the bowels of Asia had utterly defeated and conquered a great portion of his Sultan's kingdom. Of how this horse-lord had forced his sire to retreat in a panic towards the coast. How even now, his countrymen brace in terror before the wrath of Asia."

- Account of Demetrios Vardopolous, court chronicler to John Vatatzes, of the account of refugees witnessing the Battle of Kose Dag


In this TL, I shall highlight - with a deferential nod to a reasonable degree of historical accuracy - how the Byzantines could have more vigorously responded to the collapse of Seljuk power in Asia in response to the Mongol invasion by Baiju in 1243.

I am an Hellenophile, but more than that I have an appreciation for Byzantium in general, that will be reflected in my writing. I am open to questions, comments and criticism. This TL will take a while to get going, and I plan to write in piecemeal.




A picture that displays, with a reasonable agree of relevance, the strategic situation of the Palaiologan Byzantine Empire and the Seljuk state on the eve of and during the Mongol invasions of Anatolia in our original time line.

To start: a brief timeline of relevant events (I may add some dramatization where necessary, to add flavor because of the poverty of my sources)


1205:
Theodore Laskaris established himself in Nicaea in opposition to the Latin invaders in Constantinople - his state eventually encompassed what was left of Byzantine Asia Minor
1211: Under the pretext of aiding a former, deposed Byzantine Emperor, the Seljuk Sultan (the predecessor of he who was crushed at Kose Dag, interestingly enough) invaded Theodore's nascent state.
Theodore fought the Sultan in single combat and killed him with a wound through the heart. The Seljuks were routed, and the former Emperor himself was captured and forced to live the rest of his life a monastic exile.
This victory won Theodore's embattled state prestige and a boost of morale.
1212: The Emperor expanded his control east on the Black Sea coast, taking advantage of internal strife in the rival Byzantine successor state based at Trebizond.
1214-1220: The Byzantine state in Nicaea engaged in intermittent warfare with the Latin State of the City, neither side is able to make much headway.
1221: Emperor Theodore died, and is succeeded by his son John. He had to suppress internal opposition to his rule, the struggle ended after 3 years in spite in his opponents gaining support from the Latin usurpers in the City.
1225: Emperor John boldly invaded Thrace and siezed the ancient city of Hadrian (Adrianople). In response to this, the rival and overmighty Emperor Theodore, ruler of Epirus and even Thessaly, took Adrianople from John.He pushed John and his armies from Thrace. The Emperor John was greatly alarmed by this, and fortified Kallipolis on the Hellespont in preparation of a great invasion.
1230: Such events were not to pass, for Theodore, in his hubris provoked a Bulgarian horde and was crushed by their King on the fringe of northern Thrace. The 'Emperor' Theodore was thus captured, he was bandied about backwards on a mule, covered in dung and made a thing of amusement for the Bulgarian women and children-folk.




 
So, this could lead to a possible Byzantine Empire centered in Anatolia and with no Costantinople? If i'm right, it's an intriguing plot...
 
John was Theodore's son-in-law, not his son. Also, you should make the efforts to name more of the players involved like Alexios III and Kaykhusraw I. Furthermore, is Nicaea fighting anywhere in Europe other than next to the City, because if they are not, Epirus or Boril may see greater successes/longevity with interesting consequences as a result.
 
(cont..) A Thunderbolt From Asia

1235: The Emperor John met the King of Bulgaria at the halfway point between our two brotherly realms. Our gracious and kind Emperor agreed to a treaty that resulted in, among other things, the marriage of the Princess Elena of Bulgaria to our Emperor. Her Greek was rough, but then again our Emperor had to weather much during his reign.
The unity and peace of our two peoples was of paramount concern to him, regardless of the degree of spittle produced in her attempts to recite Aeschylus.

1236: The Emperor, who had recently recouped his losses from the treasonous rebels, met with the king of the Bulgars at the city of Hadrian, and joined in an expedition against the Latin cowards ruling in the City. They set about putting it
to siege, but knowing the immensity of the fortifications there, not much was gained at that time. Seeing not much progress being made, the Bulgarian King soon set off, away to his own devices, and our mighty and patient Emperor had to lift the siege.

1240: The Latins, showing a measure of their tenacity, regained several towns in Thrace in the face of the breaking of the aforementioned siege.

1241:
The mighty Basileus entered the second city of the Roman Empire, the jewel: Thessalonica. The Emperor encouraged
its former residents to return and claim their property, he then set aside funds for the rebuilding of its walls and the repair of its churches. In rags, the Emperor and a small retinue prostrated themselves publicly in a small ceremony in the Church of Saint Demetrius, celebrating the restoration of Orthodox worship. I am told that many of the Emperor's subjects in Asia at that time began to grumble and chafe at the expenses being spent on faraway conquest and construction.

1242: The Emperor received an envoy of the Turks while wintering his army in the city of Hadrian. The man, a Roman apostate in the employ of the Sultan Khaykhusrau - the son of the Sultan killed by our previous Emperor I might add - prattled at length about the need for material aid for an invasion of his master's far eastern lands. Emperor John made many convincing hand gestures, but said little, and sent the man on his way.

1243: The Emperor was convinced to return to Nicaea to meet a delegation of Turks that had fled from the far east. The rumors of an immense invasion held to be true, and the proof was presented to our sire in the form of a hundred ragged, exhausted souls. They said they had fled from battle at Theodosiopolis (Erzurum), which had fallen to a vast horde of horsemen from Asia the previous year.

The Emperor, wise in his judgement, offered them provisions and shelter, and a place in his army. They accepted, but implored the Emperor to prepare for the worst, for Theodosiopolis had not just fallen, but all the souls there had been extinguished. The Emperor, to his better judgment, agreed and left his work across the straights to Alexios Strategopoulos, a prominent and effective general that had seen much experience fighting the Epirotan rebels in Thessaly and Macedonia.

The Emperor spent the rest of the year inspecting the border in Asia with several dozen of his hand picked Latin cavalry.

1244: The court at Nicaea again recieved news of the calamity in the east. Sebastea and Caesarea too, had fallen to the terror that had erupted from Asia. This time, the survivors numbered in the thousands, and with them they carried their families, wounded and children. They had fled their farms and property in the far east, Christians and Muslims alike. Our Emperor John had prepared for them, and agreed to house them all, much to the prattling consternation of the Bishops who objected to providing food and comfort to their erstwhile opponents in faith.

(In the original timeline, the Mongols defeat the Seljuks a number of times, and then force their submission to vassal status. In this timeline, what is not known is that the Turks do quite a bit better in defending themselves, and
instead of surrendering to avoid bloodshed, they fight on. I will post my preliminary maps, they aren't very good but they should show a very vague idea of the strategic situation. The stripes show the general territories of each major player, with the stars representing key cities and locations.)

The (very, very rough, and vague) strategic situation just on the eve of the Mongol invasion.

 
Horgus

Sounds rather like the Turks are going to get very badly mauled then as the over-stretched Mongols pull back Nicaea fills the vacuum. This seems quite possible if the Seljuks are able to put up enough of a fight.

If so there could be an interesting three way situation with the empire in Anatolia, the Ilk-Khans in Iran and Mesopotamia and the Marmalukes in Egypt and Syria along with the other smaller states.

What happened OTL in terms of relations between the Mongols and Empire? I know about that time the latter was continuing to struggle with Epirus and closing in on Constantinople but not about their interaction with the Mongols, who I would have presumed at least contacted the still wealth centres of Nicaea?

Steve
 
Go forth and continue with this. While I am no fan of the Byzantines the scenario is intriguing.
 
I will have a big update next week, as I am currently quite consumed by my IRL obligations. Expect a great deal of historical diverging from OTL then. Additionally: expect my maps to improve as I continue to make them. More detail, etc.

A sample of my ideas:

A Vatatzes/Palaiologos civil war is being formulated, with the results deciding the focus of future imperial efforts.

An independent Byzantino-Morean state along the lines of Trebizond.

Expect to see the Osmans as a prominent Byzantine house in the not too distant future.

What happened OTL in terms of relations between the Mongols and Empire? I know about that time the latter was continuing to struggle with Epirus and closing in on Constantinople but not about their interaction with the Mongols, who I would have presumed at least contacted the still wealth centres of Nicaea?

You'll see. The Mongols will play an important if somewhat peripheral role in the events to come.
 
Top