Fire in the Lake
‘The conflict in Laos and the impact on the Kingdom of Vietnam.’ By Jonathon Wan
If you visit Laos today you will not see any physical reminder from the conflict half a century ago. The jungle has reclaimed the metal carcasses and the fallen in death lie in a perpetual embrace with their former foe. An avid eye may glimpse a shell fragment, but the larger pieces have long ago been placed into museums or Japanese steel mills. Unlike Europe there are no military cemeteries, only a single monument dedicated to all combatants in Vientiane.
The monument consists of a stone arch over the main road leading to parliament house. Flags representing each combatant are placed on either side of the road, each side has a single Laotian flag representing the fratricidal nature of the war to the Laotian people. Beneath the arch are numerous stone bas reliefs that illustrate a different chapter in the war from the beginning to the signing of the peace treaty at Pakse.
It has been accepted by historians that the defeat of the Pathet Lao and the Chinese Volunteers in Laos prevented Asia being subsumed as a whole by the Red hordes. However it must be asked, ‘Whether Communism was suitable to the people of South Vietnam?’
The South Vietnamese system of farming on individual plots combined with an entrepreneurial culture represents a quantum paradigm shift from the collectivist farming methods of the North that made Communism so appealing. It is unlikely that these stalwart anti-communists by culture and creed would have embraced communism as readily as their Northern relatives, if at all.
Several academics have asserted that the government of Dr Phan manipulated the conflict in Laos to unite the country. There may be an element of truth to this assertion, but that would display a callousness that has not been ascribed to Dr Phan by Bernard Fall or by any other biographer. After all this same man introduced land reform, improved local governance, facilitated one of the highest literacy rates in the developed world and created a nation.
Critics raise the incarceration of political prisoners by the Bureau for the Collection of Information under the Internal Subversion Act or the forcible collection of land from Europeans through the Vietnamese Citizenship Act. However were these actions of a man seeking to gather power at his feet, or similar to our own President Lincoln in bending the constitution to save the country?
Regardless of his many vices and virtues Dr Phan created a country that has successfully negotiated the transition from a developing to a developed economy while maintaining a stable political structure. The continuous economic growth has provided countless opportunities for their citizens for a life beyond the paddy field and villages of their ancestors. Dr Phan joins the pantheon of international figures including President Washington or Ataturk that are referred to as the father of their respective nations. In summation the Kingdom of Vietnam or colloquially South Vietnam represents one of the success stories of the twentieth century.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr Wan,
The success of the South Vietnamese in developing their economic and civil institutions is laudable. However your piece fails to adequately explain how Dr Phan was able to achieve these remarkable goals. Accordingly, you are to resubmit with further information on how this ‘father of a nation’ created a stable, prosperous state. I will expect this to be commenced for the Turtledoves next year.
Yours sincerely,
AH
Professor Andrew Hetherington