Snip
The idea of using land-reform to try and drive agricultural landlords into areas of industrial development and investment sounds quite a bit like what Mexico did during the 1930s and 1940s.
Snip
The Vietnamese trace their own independence back to freeing themselves from China (the Trung sisters, etc.) and they recognize that Vietnam has (pre-France) been at its most powerful and most free when China has somewhere else to meddle. QUOTE]
Good to see someone that knows who the Trung sisters are, and the historical issues regarding Chinese suzerainity over Vietnam.
The idea of using land-reform to try and drive agricultural landlords into areas of industrial development and investment sounds quite a bit like what Mexico did during the 1930s and 1940s.
I wasn't aware of the events in Mexico, it occurred to me that in order to have people agree to land reform - they have to receive something in return. If this is able to increase industrial production while destroying an element of appeal towards the Viet Minh / Viet Cong. May have to read up on Mexico to find out the results.
I don't think changing the dictator alters that RVN was asked to do the impossible: preserve French colonialism in a watered-down form, complete with Catholics holding autocratic power and the European/white Allies of that Vietnam refusing to let it do anything on its own. Unless you're starting for one thing with the South Vietnamese leader coming from Vietnam, as opposed to a white society, the same problems reappear: South Vietnam is the pro-White Vietnam, the Vietnam that has nothing Vietnamese about it. North Vietnam, ally to the Eastern Bloc, at least makes a pretense of it and waters down its own dependence on its allies.
At the same time you need to get the ARVN to focus on the NVA, not on Vietnamese civilians or on the Vietnamese dictator. Doing this isn't going to be easy no matter which US-backed "democrat" you decide to put in charge here.
You have missed the point again, take your ill informed opinions elsewhere.
You have missed the point again, take your ill informed opinions elsewhere.
I think he has somewhat of a point, even if it doesn't examine the whole picture.
South Vietnam needs to be able to stand on it's own two feet, and not need tens of thousands of US "advisors" helping to keep the government in power.
Even if the people in charger are better than OTL, and even if they've made better decisions so far, it remains to be seen if they will westernize Vietnam, or respect the history of the nation.
Personally I think you've got an interesting timeline going. That being said, if you can't handle critisism, even if it's bad critisism, then you shouldn't post here anymore.
I think it's fairly clear that you're misunderstanding the fundamental problems Saigon had. The first sign of this in the ATL is when Catholic Vietnamese accept Buddhist anything telling them what to do and how to do it. The Catholic Vietnamese expected that working with the French entitled them to be leaders, something reinforced by the Diem regime IOTL. Second, your pacification campaign modeled on Malaya and the Philippines working that smoothly shows no grasp whatsoever of the huge difference between Malaya, the Philippines, and Vietnam: the Communists were Vietnamese, the people against them were Vietnamese. There is no readily-identifiable group lacking a strong foreign backer to repress.
Second, your pacification campaign modeled on Malaya and the Philippines working that smoothly shows no grasp whatsoever of the huge difference between Malaya, the Philippines, and Vietnam: the Communists were Vietnamese, the people against them were Vietnamese. There is no readily-identifiable group lacking a strong foreign backer to repress.
Saigon needs a hugely different approach, so when you had this you pretty much passed the point of timeline and went right into wank. It's a good read, but the realism died at the second point most clearly.
The ethos of this TL is 'Right man, right place, right time.' But when I draft version II it will require changes within the French administration to reflect the same idea. However I will continue with this TL to a pre determined point in time and then I will start refining my ideas.
I originally considered a TL with a pro western North Vietnam and a communist South I may revisit that idea in the second version. It is possible but requires a couple of very strong POD's. I thought that it would be interesting to be a pro western country sharing a border with two communist countries and how that would impact upon the development of the country and the military.
Something that I want to work through in the second version is how exposure to power changes a person's ethics. So originally the person is idealistic and over time, they may maintain their original goal but be more ruthless in how they achieve it.
Hanoi, D 67
‘There is a more militant stance against the Nationalist hold outs on Formosa. Marshall Peng De Hui still leads the General Staff and he is focused on improving the People’s Liberation Army. However their stance has led them to increase their advisory inside Laos and we would be wise to balance that influence.’
The idea of using land-reform to try and drive agricultural landlords into areas of industrial development and investment sounds quite a bit like what Mexico did during the 1930s and 1940s.