A Step to the Left.

OK... This is my new timeline, "A Step to the Left". It will mostly be background for the presidential elections, but I have it ALL planned up to 1972, and the presidents up to the modern day. It starts with a more independent Populist Party, which will eventually evolve into a big umbrella party for the Left. Update soon, hopefully...

Socialism rose in Europe, labor spoke out,
And politics listened, changed...

And over in the United States of America,
Politics were a-changing as well...
Very soon, there will be a party in the US...
That will be every so red as a rose...
Step to the left, and everything changes...

And after a terrible war that kills thousands,
Labor will speak out again for more compassion...
People's Governments will be brought in by the ballot...
Not by the bullet, as many of the upper class feared...

Red, red, red as a rose... I'm voting Labor, what about you...
 
Sorry, but too space bat!

After all, we all know how many Green Party presidents there've been. Or UK Green Party PMs.

And even if the space space bats let you do that magically, why think you'd have a different, more liberal voters or elected reps?
 
Last edited:
1896
(Credit for the PoD goes to Emperor Julian.)

America was about to undergo a massive shift in politics, but it didn't know it yet...

In those days, there were three major parties, the Democratic, Republican and Populist parties. The Republican Party was generally the liberal party, but that would change in the election of 1896... The Republicans nominated William McKinley, the former Governor of Ohio, as their presidential candidate. McKinley was a well-known conservative who supported the Gold Standard that existed at the time. He was supported by Mark Hanna, a wealthy and talented Ohioan businessman who ensured McKinley had plenty of funds for the campaign. However, not as much businessmen as Hanna would have liked, supported McKinley. A fair few of them supported the eventual Democratic candidate.

The Democratic Party was heavily split between Conservatives (which supported the existing Gold Standard) and Populists (which were pro-bimetallism). The Conservatives united around William Russell, which at the Convention, gave a great speech arguing for the Gold Standard. Populist Democrats hoped that their candidate, William Jennings Bryan, would give a speech that would guarantee him the nomination. However, Bryan's throat was damaged by choking on a sandwich a while before, so his "Cross of Gold" speech was an absolute failure. Russell won the convention.

The Populist Party was essentially waiting to see if Bryan would pull it off at the Democratic convention. When they saw that he failed, they turned to James H. Kyle, which declined out of a sense that Bryan deserved the nomination. The Populists offered the nomination to Bryan, and he deliberated, before being convinced by his wife to take it. The Populists were getting impatient, no letter were delivered, and they were about to nominate Thomas E. Watson, when the letter finally came from a now determined Bryan. They nominated him for president and Watson as his running mate.

McKinley ran a front-porch campaign, campaigning from his home, which ensured that the people didn't see his bad side, and only saw his good, by via of McKinley's campaign choosing only those who would portray him positively. The funding that Hanna raised, ensured that everybody knew about McKinley by Election Night '96.

Russell ran a pro-active campaign, focusing on the South, since polls showed him losing in the Upper South. His funding were quite high, but not as high as McKinley. He however, did ensure that there were a lot of publicity for his campaign. This however, was a bad move, as his campaign had a lot of sticky moments, thanks to populist Democrats. On Election Night, he was polling badly, and started to turn to drink, which would eventually kill him.

Bryan ran a pro-active campaign, similar to Russell, but focused on the Midwest, where he thought that Populism could take off. He also focused on the West, where the Populist Party always did well. This tactic would eventually pay off in a future election, but it didn't go as well as Bryan hoped in this one, as Ohio, a large state, was practically guaranteed for McKinley thanks to the favorite son effect. Everywhere else, however, Bryan was polling very well, surpassing Russell in a lot of Midwestern states, but critically, he was a distant second to McKinley in those states.

On Election Night 1896, American politics was changed forever...

William McKinley/Garret Hobart (Republican) 326 EV, 43.8% PV
William E. Russell/Adlai Stevenson (Democratic) 77 EV, 29.7% PV
William J. Bryan/Thomas E. Watson (Populist) 44 EV, 21.2% PV


ASL1896.PNG
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but too space bat!

After all, we all know how many Green Party presidents there've been. Or UK Green Party PMs.

And even if the space space bats let you do that magically, why think you'd have a different, more liberal voters or elected reps?
First, the Green Party will most likely remain a minor party or be butterflied out of existence.

And I'm taking a little inspiration from Jello (albeit my TL will not go as radical as Reds! did) and butterflying Teddy as President (until 1914...)
 

Japhy

Banned
Bryan would not have walked out in 1896, and you're mistaken that a more successful Populist Party would provoke a leftward shift, especially of a labor/socialist sort. I will be passing on this.
 
1900

McKinley's first term was a relatively prosperous one, the Spanish-American War was started, and a fair deal lot of people went to fight for the Union.

Theodore Roosevelt, the Progressive firebrand, was considering going, but then a train accident broke his leg and forced him to stay at home, which he hated. He wanted to go and fight the Spanish, damn it!

William Jennings Bryan, the Populist superstar, signed up and was commissioned as a Captain. In the critical Battle of San Juan Hill, Bryan led his soldiers to victory. Bryan however did receive several wounds to the arm that would take a while to heal. He returned home to a hero's welcome, and observed post-war politics, especially the GOP landslide of the mid-term elections and the increase in Populist Representatives and Senators, in the safety of his own house.

When the presidential election of 1900 came, a lot of Populists wanted Bryan to run, but he declined. Other Populists must have the chance to run, he said. Many historians accept this as returning the favor to James H. Kyle, allowing him to run in 1900. In the convention, Thomas Watson, Bryan's former running mate, argued against Kyle becoming the nominee, arguing that he (Watson) would gain the South from the now-weak Democrats. Bryan's endorsement of Kyle was what sealed the deal and ensured Kyle got the nomination. As his running mate, they chose Marion Butler, a Populist Senator from North Carolina.

The Republican Party re-nominated the incumbent, William McKinley, after all, he was a war-leader, a successful man and a great president. The run for vice president after Garret Hobart's death was quite heated, but in the end, McKinley chose someone he knew was reliable and dependable, Sereno E. Payne, Representative of New York. (In ATL, he never became Majority Leader).

The Democratic Party's convention was quite heated, with Horace Boies, Joseph C. S. Blackburn, Sylvester Pennoyer and William F. Vilas providing ample competition for William E. Russell, seeking re-nomination, but in the end, he managed to defeat all but Pennoyer, which to ensure party unity, accepted Russell's offer of the running mate position. The Democratic Party was however, missing a limb, its Populist limb which fled to the Populist Party upon Bryan's acceptance of the nomination. Many said this would ensure the Democrats would become a minor party. Those people were laughed at by the whole of the Democratic Party.

On Election Night 1900, McKinley won re-election handily, gaining several states from the Populists, but due to the Cleveland Effect not affecting the Democrats, McKinley lost several states to them. Kyle proved to be somewhat less then a campaigner than Bryan, losing his home state to McKinley by the barest of margins. Russell's second try ended in failure, and he resigned from politics, turning to drink, which would kill him in 1903. Many accept the increase in the Democrat vote and the decrease in the Populist one as the result of many Democrat voters turning up to vote, which in 1896, they didn't and enthusiasm for the Populists somewhat decreased.

William McKinley/Sereno E. Payne (Republican) 310 EV, 51.0% PV
William E. Russell/Sylvester Pennoyer (Democratic) 100 EV, 32.6% PV
James H. Kyle/Marion Butler (Populist) 37 EV, 12.9% PV


ASL1900.PNG
 
Last edited:
Bryan would not have walked out in 1896, and you're mistaken that a more successful Populist Party would provoke a leftward shift, especially of a labor/socialist sort. I will be passing on this.
A number of factors leads to this.

And the Populists made coalitions with labor unions. In this timeline, that will ultimately lead to a Labor Party.
 

Japhy

Banned
A number of factors leads to this.

And the Populists made coalitions with labor unions. In this timeline, that will ultimately lead to a Labor Party.

Failed coalition building with Unions did happen, but again, the Populists are no where near the party that one needs to start with to build a labor party, for economic, social and cultural reasons that are at the very heart of the Populist party. They were a rural party whos interests were opposed to those of the urban workers. But whatever, if you have a number of factors...
 
A number of factors leads to this.

And the Populists made coalitions with labor unions. In this timeline, that will ultimately lead to a Labor Party.

Why are they going to make a coalition with labor unions? It's a different demographic for them and one that isn't very powerful at this stage. Mind explaining that one? :confused:
 

Japhy

Banned
It happened in OTL. In ATL, the labor-Populist relationship becomes more closer.

It failed IOTL. Because City Workers were smart enough to know what Populist policies knew to them. Inflation was great for indebted farmers, awful for wage earners who could barely live off the pay already.

Thats the biggest, simplest problem, right there.
 
It failed IOTL. Because City Workers were smart enough to know what Populist policies knew to them. Inflation was great for indebted farmers, awful for wage earners who could barely live off the pay already.

Thats the biggest, simplest problem, right there.
Indeed. And that is why I'm going to have the Populists change somewhat. Big-tent party principle will affect them a lot. Being the main party of the Left will attract a lot of socialist members, which will affect the Populists' make-up. Eventually there's a split between old-school Populists and "New Populists" (aka socialists) that will end the old Populist Party and bring in a new party, of the working class, yet also for farmers. Bryan remains loyal to the party, viewing his old Populist friends as backstabbing the party and being too blind to the plight of the American lower class.

Wait and see...
 
Top