Why I think you've just killed Mirage 2000 here? If the Germans and Italians have committed themselves to Mirage 4000 and are shouldering a significant part of the development cost the French air force is almost certain to follow here, at least for ~160 aircraft (in place of Mirage 2000N and Mirage 2000D) if not the whole order. Also we've probably just killed both Eurofighter and Rafale here, more advanced variants of Jaguar and Mirage 4000 should more than suffice.In 1977 the Jaguar found it’s first export sales, but like the Lightning and Buccaneer in the previous decade these were small sales of 10 to Ecuador and 12 to Oman.(1) The big potential for Jaguar sales was in a pair of competitions to procure new fighters from India and Canada, each having expressed a desire to procure substantially more than 100 aircraft. Australia was still a potential customer to replace its fleet of Mirage III although in the post-Vietnam environment there was little appetite to rush this replacement, so while the RAAF retained an interest in the Lightning no project had been initiated. Of passing interest to the British was the decision of the final remnants of the once 5 strong MRA group Germany and Italy to take over funding of the privately developed Dasault Mirage 4000(2) against a requirement for 424 aircraft.(3)
Why I think you've just killed Mirage 2000 here? If the Germans and Italians have committed themselves to Mirage 4000 and are shouldering a significant part of the development cost the French air force is almost certain to follow here, at least for ~160 aircraft (in place of Mirage 2000N and Mirage 2000D) if not the whole order. Also we've probably just killed both Eurofighter and Rafale here, more advanced variants of Jaguar and Mirage 4000 should more than suffice.
Hmm wonder what happens to the Mirage 2000 exports TTL. For India it makes more sense to buy more Jaguars instead of Mirages and MiG-29s. UAEjust buys 4000 and Egypt would love to do the same if the money is there (and given they coughed up $1 billion for just 20 aircraft per SIPRI in OTL it probably is). Then you have the Greeks, who originally were looking for 100-120 aircraft locally built in Greece with Tornado, F-18, Mirage 2000 and F-16 as the candidates and F-18 being the preferred choice. TTL you instead have Jaguar, F-18, Mirage 4000 and F-16 competing, F-16 seems destinctly outclassed here. I'd expect they go either for an all Mirage 4000 force or for a mix of Mirage 4000 and F-16s. Depends on Mirage 4000 cost. If it is on par with Tornado as it is implied here, then 100 Mirage 4000s would cost about as much as 40 Mirage 2000 +40 F-16 and allow both local production and an immensely more capable force... besides letting Papandreou show how independent he is from America.
I mean, if you're buying this TTL Jaguar I don't really see the point of buying MiG-23s instead of more Jaguars.Yes, I missed the footnote.
The same applies to India as applied to Ecuador I suppose, it shouldn't effect MiG-23 numbers, or not much anyway.
I mean, if you're buying this TTL Jaguar I don't really see the point of buying MiG-23s instead of more Jaguars.
Australia also adopted the Leopard 1a3 as the AS1 (Australian Standard One). They were the launch customers for the 1a3. They were thinking about the Chieftain as well as the M60 but decided to go with the cheaper non-US/non-Uk Leopard instead. That happened in 1975.
They were also looking for a replacement for the Mirage III from about 1977 onwards. In the mix was the Tornado ADV, F-15, F-16, F-18, Mirage 2000 and Viggen. The Viggen was eliminated early, then the Mirage 2000 and the F-16 and the Tornado, That left the choice between the F-15 and the F-18. The F-18 won 'cause it was cheaper than the F-15, which was the Rolls Royce of planes at that stage. What the RAAF wanted was a fighter-bomber and the F-15 didn't allow "a pound for ground pounding", in it's design.
It was eliminated before it could be trialed. Trials were held of M60a1 and the Leopard 1. The M60 was ultimately rejected because the US could not guarantee that they could supply all of the required vehicles in one tranche. The Germans could and did (and did the dirty on us by not allowing us to build the AVLBs ourselves). The reason why multiple tranches were a problem was because there was no guarantee that the vehicle would retain the same controls between them. This could lead to training problems which were unsustainable. A big problem for the Army to sustain different vehicles.We didn't trial the Chieftain in 1972/73. I think we wanted something lighter.
Harpoons were not part of the reasoning behind the purchase of the F/A-18. It's utility as a fighter-bomber were. The F-15 didn't have that capability. The F-16 only had one engine. F/A-18 had two and could deliver air-to-ground armaments. It won the contract.The Hornet had harpoons, we were harpoon mad in the early/mid 80s.
Cost is a far bigger problem when comparing TTL Jaguars to OTL Jaguars, so we can dismiss that angle. Diversity of supply is nice, but India OTL bought too many types of tactical aircraft between the MiG-21 and Su-30 MKI, so some rationalization is a good idea.What about cost, diversity of supply and the politics of being in the Non Aligned Movement? India won't buy from the US but if they get too buddy buddy with Britain they'll lose that moral high ground of the NAM. What sort of deals could the Soviets put together, can they make India an offer too good to refuse?
The last of the new Dreadnought class SSBNs will named after himIt was something along those lines
I mean nothing is ever written in stone and the latest flat tops were named Invincible, Illustrious,IndomitableArk Royal, then QE and POW (with some chatter over the last decade of POW being named Ark Royal but that never happened)
But this has resulted in no ship ever being named after the last King!
Cost is a far bigger problem when comparing TTL Jaguars to OTL Jaguars, so we can dismiss that angle. Diversity of supply is nice, but India OTL bought too many types of tactical aircraft between the MiG-21 and Su-30 MKI, so some rationalization is a good idea.
The difference is likely to be license production. The Indians got a license from the Soviet Union to build the MiG-27 at HAL as part of ongoing efforts to build up to a domestic aviation industry. Given the Indians acquired 300 MiG-23s/27s, it would be tricky just from an industrial perspective to replace them all with more Jaguars without such, so a lot depends on the British government's willingness to allow that.
It may end up being that the Jaguar covers MiG-29 and Mirage 2000 orders, the latter in particular since it looks like the Mirage 2000 is going to be butterflied away.
Honestly, I wish I still had that forum post detailing all the major panic decisions the Indians made for their Air Force over the last 40 years.
Probably because of the first and third reason, i mean this is a very educational read, even for someone like me who isn’t that knowledgeable about the uk defenceIs it because this all makes sense? (the ideal solution) Or because nobody could be bothered?(the worst scenario) Or because nobody knows enough to argue?(I'm happy to extol at length on this pet subject)