January 11, 1941
To: Laventry Beria, GUGB
Comrade 1st rank, State Security
Re: Enormoz and Flintlock
From: Pavel Fitin
Our agents have managed to penetrate many of the recent American projects as well as some of the information they have shared with the British. Apparently the United States has not only taken a lead in rocketry, but also in electronics as well. Until recently we noted the irony of Germany maintaining an interest after the American Goddard pushed development in this area. Somehow development of his project was quietly advanced over the last 15 years to a point that permitted a recent launch of over 1000 miles range over their states of New Mexico and Texas, landing in the Gulf of Mexico. Apparently a ship was waiting almost ten miles away and managed to collect data from a probe that the rocket carried with it. The launch succeeded in prompting a flurry of reports in Corpus Christi and several towns in between of the chance of 'aliens' attacking the country. As yet we are unable to get all of the data from the launch itself, their gyroscopes are not sufficient to permit precision targeting on any sort of scale but we can confirm a maximum altitude of over 200km was achieved.
Our interest lay more in the tactical rocketry and ballistics systems for short-range rocket systems. Without some sort of very heavy explosive atop them, long-distance rockets as weapons seems a disproportionate use of resources, though use as terror weapons is still being evaluated. American development of the M9A1 'Bazooka' rocket system permits penetration of over 100mm of armor. Their most interesting developments thus far appear to be a working jet turbine engine at least as powerful as that developed by Frank Whittle (possibly time-and-a-half as powerful) and a project to develop guidance for rockets fired from aircraft. These air-to-air rockets would permit immediate and rapid aerial dominance should they be successfully deployed. Interestingly the Americans may have a solution for that as well, the development of a ground-to-air missile like the ones recently proposed in Germany (Project Firefly). Should these systems be successfully implemented, especially should guidance be improved such that the operators of aircraft be able to use them while airborne, either we will be at a significant disadvantage or overwhelmed before able to formulate a response. Given our recent cooperation with Germany I suggest either collaborating with some of the recent developments in these fields or countering with our own projects.
To: Laventry Beria, GUGB
Comrade 1st rank, State Security
Re: Enormoz and Flintlock
From: Pavel Fitin
Our agents have managed to penetrate many of the recent American projects as well as some of the information they have shared with the British. Apparently the United States has not only taken a lead in rocketry, but also in electronics as well. Until recently we noted the irony of Germany maintaining an interest after the American Goddard pushed development in this area. Somehow development of his project was quietly advanced over the last 15 years to a point that permitted a recent launch of over 1000 miles range over their states of New Mexico and Texas, landing in the Gulf of Mexico. Apparently a ship was waiting almost ten miles away and managed to collect data from a probe that the rocket carried with it. The launch succeeded in prompting a flurry of reports in Corpus Christi and several towns in between of the chance of 'aliens' attacking the country. As yet we are unable to get all of the data from the launch itself, their gyroscopes are not sufficient to permit precision targeting on any sort of scale but we can confirm a maximum altitude of over 200km was achieved.
Our interest lay more in the tactical rocketry and ballistics systems for short-range rocket systems. Without some sort of very heavy explosive atop them, long-distance rockets as weapons seems a disproportionate use of resources, though use as terror weapons is still being evaluated. American development of the M9A1 'Bazooka' rocket system permits penetration of over 100mm of armor. Their most interesting developments thus far appear to be a working jet turbine engine at least as powerful as that developed by Frank Whittle (possibly time-and-a-half as powerful) and a project to develop guidance for rockets fired from aircraft. These air-to-air rockets would permit immediate and rapid aerial dominance should they be successfully deployed. Interestingly the Americans may have a solution for that as well, the development of a ground-to-air missile like the ones recently proposed in Germany (Project Firefly). Should these systems be successfully implemented, especially should guidance be improved such that the operators of aircraft be able to use them while airborne, either we will be at a significant disadvantage or overwhelmed before able to formulate a response. Given our recent cooperation with Germany I suggest either collaborating with some of the recent developments in these fields or countering with our own projects.