Sounds tasty.Yes. It is sort of like a creme-filled donut
Sounds tasty.Yes. It is sort of like a creme-filled donut
Luke you aren't coming off rude, and I understand where you are coming from, you are Italian and don't want to see Italy do bad in this war. Its like I don't want to see the US to perform badly in any TL that I'm reading. Yet this is the only the first world war in this TL. The second one is going to be a radically different one from OTL.Sorry, but here must start some little rant and i preempetly give you my humblest apologies if i soud rude or irritating...but the idea that was thanks to the Anglo-French reinforcements that Italy held the CP at bay it's just a myth; the relatevely meager contigent barely fought and arrived when the front was already stabilizated and was quickly retreated, what was sent later was used just as reserve.
The italian brass already thought that the Piave line will not resist and make plan to continue the war as everybody knows that even a white peace mean revolution, so no cut the losses will not be in the mind of anyone as their own head are on the line.
Ironically the defeat at Caporetto (at least on OTL) basically united the entire nation as the fear of Austrian invasion mobilizated everyone.
The problem of Germany making offer is that they had even less credibility than the Entente at Versailles, in the eyes of the italian goverment.
Luke you aren't coming off rude, and I understand where you are coming from, you are Italian and don't want to see Italy do bad in this war. Its like I don't want to see the US to perform badly in any TL that I'm reading. Yet this is the only the first world war in this TL. The second one is going to be a radically different one from OTL.
But back to the point, I decided Italy could take its licks in 1916 and bow out and face the fall out on go on till 1917 which honestly if they did, it would made things worse for Italy, a lot worse. France is having troop issues. The British are overstretched. And you are already seen what happened to Russia. Think about what would happen to Italy even I had decided to fight on?
Fair enough. I am not that familiar with the history of Italy pre and during WWI, I'm more of a WWII buff but and even then I have not read nearly enough about Italy in WWII as compared to Germany, Japan and to a lesser extant the allies.As everything in the world there are two side of the arguments; from Rome pow the austrian were not white virgins backstabbed by the greedy italians...but people that had during the alliance demanded only but had given very very little (even in term of support regarding other italian objective), even thinking to invade the supposed ally a couple of times and Italy backing out was not so shocking as Wien desired that as othewise it will be forced to divide the pie and so give to the italians a big mean to legally not be obbligated to fullfill their treaty duty not consulting them in their Dow (plus the 'theoretically' defensive nature of the CP)
Plus there were the fear that if Italy fought alongside the CP once the war was finished A-H will have backstabbed Italy (and Romania if still neutral or allied) to resolve all her problems...as said things are rarely black and white, expecially in WWI.
Edit: sorry but the italian army not having gas mask it's a little difficult to believe with more funds available as Rome asking terms; as everybody knows that this will mean revolution and the fall of the monarchy so there will be no incentive to surrender (not happened in OTL with basically the offer of a white peace so i greatly doubt that will happen here).
Well they had mutinies OTL, combine with the US shutting down trade making the leaders more desperate and engaging in riskier and restless attacks...Wow the French army just broke down.
Yeah I read about the French mutinies in OTL WWI, Smitty just kicked it up several notches.Well they had mutinies OTL, combine with the US shutting down trade making the leaders more desperate and engaging in riskier and restless attacks...
All I'm going to say is Nivelle is a dead man walking.Yeah I read about the French mutinies in OTL WWI, Smitty just kicked it up several notches.
Oh I believe that!All I'm going to say is Nivelle is a dead man walking.
'MERICA!
Anyway lack of a standing land force really hurt the US early, fortunate they only had to face a Canada with its best troops away and depleted garrisons. Still I think this will cause them to keep a larger standing force more so since the British should be spoiling for revenge. At the very least the US would want their territories returned and taking the Sandwich Islands and parts of a Canada (such as Victoria) and a strip to give a land route to Alaska (plus close off the pacific coast to the British). Bermuda would be another location they would want to control. Newfoundland as well to control the Atlantic Coast.
Naval wise I can see more ships being built intended for longer ranges.
Yeah that will go over well at peace talks. The US has all of Canada occupied along with Newfoundland, the British Carribean, and Hawaii. The British and friends hold only American SW and Central Pacific Islands and China. And it was the British who asked for a cease fire. Yeah that will last all of 60 seconds before the US tells the Canadians that they can't demand shit.I'm pretty sure that the Canadian government would tell the US that it won't accept any territorial losses.
Canada lost and lost bad, their entire alliance is on the losing side of the war and the US will want to reduce the land based threat. Germany won't mind at all either a chance to weaken the British and get the US on their side.I'm pretty sure that the Canadian government would tell the US that it won't accept any territorial losses.
Yeah that will go over well at peace talks. The US has all of Canada occupied along with Newfoundland, the British Carribean, and Hawaii. The British and friends hold only American SW and Central Pacific Islands and China. And it was the British who asked for a cease fire. Yeah that will last all of 60 seconds before the US tells the Canadians that they can't demand shit.
Canada might not be able to demand anything, but that doesn't mean that they can't keep saying no to the US' demands.
Canada in WWI is a quasi-independent nation from the way I read it. The British have final say as a DOW against London is still out standing. Canada gave a good fight everything out standing, but it trying a tactic like which as far as I know has never been done before could back fire badly and frankly I don't see it working.Canada might not be able to demand anything, but that doesn't mean that they can't keep saying no to the US' demands.