A modern Ferdinand assasination analogy

WI a US Vice Presidnet who had been hostile to Islamism were murdered in Afgansitan or India and there were suspciions that Pakistan was implicated?

By the way was there any risk that Oswald would look enough like a Soviet agent to have endangered World Peace?
 

Cook

Banned
Well, Bush II said US has to go after Iraq because they tried to kill his father....
Really, when?

And a small reminder regarding Conspiracy Theories in this forum.

By the way was there any risk that Oswald would look enough like a Soviet agent to have endangered World Peace?
For it to be analogous, Oswald would have to have been a Soviet Agent, made a full confession and his accomplices all captured, all with a few hours of the assassination taking place.
 
Really, when?

When what? When did he say that or when did Iraqis try to kill his father? As to former I don't have exact date but it was mentioned in late 02. As to the latter there was a plan to kill Bush I when he visited Kuwait in 1993. Attack was prevented and Iraqi intelligence was supposed to be behind it.
 
Have President George W Bush visit Egypt or Saudi Arabia and get killed. Someone is getting bombed and invaded.
 
The U.S. President gets killed by an illegal muslim Mexican hired by the North Korean/Iranian government?
 
That would mean a horribly bungled assassination attempt which goes right at the last moment from a fluke killing an unpopular Grade A Jackass who happens to be really, really capable of alienating everyone except the leaders of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
 

BlondieBC

Banned
Really, when?

And a small reminder regarding Conspiracy Theories in this forum.


For it to be analogous, Oswald would have to have been a Soviet Agent, made a full confession and his accomplices all captured, all with a few hours of the assassination taking place.

It was under Clinton, and he bomb Iraq in retaliation.
 
Back to the original post, I doubt that anything short of the assasination of a sitting US President - by itself - could be used by the US as the raison d'etre for a formal war or conquest against the perpetrating nation. Important to note that, while the preempted attempt against Bush I in Kuwait may well have put Iraq in Dubbya's sights from day one (and may have been his reason for the war), this was never used publically as justification for the US Invasion. As noted this happened while Clinton was president and was used to justify punitive bombing of Iraq, but not an invasion.

Also, emotionally, I suspect that killing a Crown Prince/Heir to the Throne carried far more emotional baggage to Austrians in 1914, than the assassination of any US Vice-President would today. Franz Ferdinand was the automatic sucessor to the King. When you kill the Crown Prince you are killing future Emperior. An American Vice President is merely an elected official that becomes president if a President can't finish his term. This is nothing like being a designated heir to a king.
 
Top