A Land of Milk and Honey

Dang,I was hoping in a world without Reagan and Nixon dominating California GOP Circles, that Bob Finch would get the Gubernatorial Nomination ITTL, bringining his smart moderate approach to governing(Which Ironically proved largely successful in Ronnie's Governorship). Nice to see Bobby sticking his head close to the ground to establish the network needed to become a successful Senator in this country, but I doubt by 1972 with 12 years of Democratic Rule, that the original plan will stay the same. Keep it comming buddy:D
 
There was a massive riot in Cleveland last week, along with smaller ones in Philly & Brooklyn requiring deployment of the National Guards in both states. This whole problem is getting out of control & as HHH says, the NG is not the answer to slums’ problems. Neither are the solutions the Democrats are proposing which will only increase the poor’s dependency on the state & make them part of a permanent underclass dependent on govt benefits. What is coming up is the open-housing provision that has many Democrats worried due to its effects on them. This is one area where Bob agrees with them, but he says that the reason open housing is such a problem is the natural rivalry between white ethnics & poor minorities to protect their current position on the socioeconomic ladder. That is the essential dynamic at play here that many seem to be ignoring both on our side & theirs. What has happened is the NDC’s various components are at each other’s throats because of civil rights, something that absolutely no one wants to admit for fear of bringing the whole flimsy structure down on their collective heads. Daley has been trying to shift blame onto MLK & the NAACP but the truth is that they have lost control of their movement- the genie has been uncorked & there is no way to close the door after the horse left the barn. In the House Ford has said he will lead a unified caucus in opposing it while we have to do the same here. The VRA was bad enough, but I cannot vote for open housing & hope to survive in Texas. What I will do is vote no & says that I cannot vote for it as it currently stands. Were the Dems smart they would put a crime bill through first & then this, if for no other reason than optics. November will be very fun indeed.

- Bush Diaries, July 7


Cleveland police respond to a house fire caused by arson during last week's rioting.

The_Hough_Riots.jpg



I have been touring Europe & Asia as part of my duties as FRC’s ranking member & find them all rather condescending about our racial violence. However they have the same problem, without the racial element, youth is in revolt everywhere. The good part about being out of the country is not being constantly bombarded by the media about what my positions are on this mess of a civil rights bill making its way through Congress. Most of it will pass but Title IV won‘t, open housing is simply not possible now that the NDC’s core groups are at each other’s throats- the liberals’ worst nightmare since that is the foundation of the Democratic Party. In Brooklyn it was so pathetic that the RINO Lindsay had to ask the local godfather to broker a peace between the Italians, Puerto Ricans & blacks before all-out race war erupted in East NY- & they’re still ignoring BK’s crime bill. You pray for your opponents to be this monumentally stupid, or lacking in any strategic or tactical insight, when in politics. In Illinois Chuck Percy has taken an extremely courageous stance on behalf of open housing while even Paul Douglas, one of the most liberal Democrats, has started to waver in face of unyielding white ethnic opposition. Too little too late & they will reap the winds of what they have sown in November. I am telling them, as a senior member of the Policy Committee, to hit as hard as they can on this- urban issues will be the defining issue of this fall’s campaign. Our previous plan is government overreach into every aspect of American life & this can be tied into it as well. When we return I will be interesting to see what will happen in August, the hottest month of the year in CA & whether there will be more riots before campaigning begins in September.
- Nixon Diaries, July 31


Mayor Lindsay and Gov. Rockefeller at a news conference in New York City, July 26.

U1515868-10.jpg



I’m now at home after we adjourned for the August recess last week, in practice this is the kickoff of the general election’s campaign season. In the South Mrs. Wallace is going to easily beat RDG after the riots, Callaway still has a decent shot at winning the Georgian governorship however. Meanwhile MLK has threatened to march on Cicero. That is awfully close to a suicidal act- last time a black person tried to live there, 17 years ago, the riots were so large that it made the international media. Daley has been methodically screwing them all over with his pledges over the years & there is de facto segregation in Chicago, just that no one ever talks about it. Officially it does not exist but banks do not lend to blacks & in a lesser-known problem, Latinos. Therefore to buy a house they are dependent on unscrupulous businessmen who give them unsecured loans which can be withdrawn at any time in order to even buy an apartment, let alone a bungalow in the Chicago suburbs. Daley has not done anything to address this because it would be further tearing at the social fabric in Chicago & he relies on both constituencies to maintain dominance. Bussing is also a major problem: both sides have flawed arguments. The liberals don’t understand the importance of the neighbourhood school while the conservatives don’t understand that this is used as a stalking horse for private segregation: i.e. white flight while poor nonwhites are left in the rotting hellholes known as inner-city schools. I’ve been spending a lot of time in the NY schools of all stripes recently & have seen this for myself. What we need is not more federal money: we need better use of the money available, otherwise they’re just throwing taxpayers’ money down the proverbial toilet. So as not to appear opportunistic I will wait until the 90th before introducing my bills. That is when I will also do the rounds of the conservative publications, including NR, WS, WSJ & FR to make my case- it will get more attention if I do it there, plus a more sympathetic audience.

- RFK Diaries, Aug. 6


Sen. Robert Kennedy tours Bedford-Stuyvesant, Aug. 9.


90000954.jpg




Alabama Democratic gubernatorial primary, Aug. 29

Lurleen Wallace: 61.3%
Ryan DeGraffenried: 38.6%


Segregationist Democrats did fantastically well in the South’s late summer gubernatorial primaries. A pattern repeated itself: moderates of sterling credentials became the favourite of swooning national pundits. In Arkansas it was former congressman and Johnson aide Brooks Hayes. In the border state of Maryland it was the fine liberal congressman Carleton Sickles and the outgoing governor’s protégé, Attorney General Tom Finan. In Georgia there were three: Ellis Arnall, a former governor that political scientist V.O. Key called the most effective in the century; Ernest Vandiver, reputed to have saved the Georgia educational system after segregationists threatened to shut it down after Brown v. Board of Education; and a dark horse, a handsome young navy man that some called Kennedyesque, Jimmy Carter. The Democratic field in Georgia was so fine; some pundits thought that no Republican would emerge to challenge the winner. Then, the second part of the pattern: a far-right segregationist won the Democratic nomination. In Georgia it was high school dropout Lester Maddox, who took out regular ads for his restaurant in Atlanta papers that excoriated, for example, “the ungodly Civil Rights legislation that the politicians and the Communists and the Communist-inspired agitators are trying to pass in Congress that will enslave all Americans.” In Arkansas it was state Supreme Court justice James “Justice Jim” Johnson, best known for his 1956 ballot initiative to nullify federal civil rights laws. In Maryland, it was George Mahoney, a malcontent who picked up racial demagoguery after his sixth electoral loss, took as his slogan “Your Home Is Your Castle- Protect It” and gave some of his speeches in minstrel dialect. Maddox, Mahoney and Johnson all won their respective gubernatorial nominations. Everett Dirksen was just nine votes shy of passing his perennial bill to restore prayer in public schools (only three Republicans voted against it). “I would say the overall trend is, at the moment,” allowed George Gallup in U.S. News and World Report, in an understatement, “towards more conservative sentiment.”

- [A Time to Remember]

Georgia's Democratic gubernatorial nominee Lester Maddox.
50328812.jpg



Arkansas Democratic gubernatorial nominee "Justice Jim" Johnson.
jim_johnson_cover_t300.JPG



After the East New York riots in July, the Patrolman’s Benevolent Association got 96,888 signatures to get a referendum on the November ballot to dissolve the Civilian Complaint Review Board. The law only required them to get 30,000. Both sides opened bustling campaign offices. Cassese of the PBA opened theirs with a speech recalling how his boys had handily put down the riot in Harlem in 1964- while supposedly; Rochester and Philadelphia had burned nearly to the ground. “Why? Because they have review boards there... Communism and Communists are mixed up in this fight. If we wind up with a review board, we’ll have done Russia a great service... The doctrine of the Communist Party is to knock out religion and break the spirit, as well as create confusion in the police department, cause chaos, and interrupt the public function.” The liberal coalition organized to fight to keep the review board couldn’t have been more delighted with the opposition, its laziness with the facts (Rochester and Philadelphia had fared no worse than Harlem in 1964) and their Red-baiting. The facts were on their side, and that was enough: of the 113 cases the CCRB had investigated since June, disciplinary action had only been recommended in three of them. It all just made so much sense, just as the facts the liberals had marshalled in hearings for the 1966 civil rights bill and its open-housing title had made so much sense.In California, Pat Brown was trying the same strategy, isolating his opponents as an extremist fringe- just as Barry Goldwater’s supporters were isolated as an extremist fringe. It worked about as well as it did for Brown in California. Since 1965 Schaap had cowritten a series on New York’s crime epidemic: “Cab drivers rest iron bars on the front seat next to them,” he reported. “The weapons were justified.” The world had changed. The ground was shifting.

[A Time to Remember]
 
One issue that we have been pushing hard recently is inflation. Even though it is becoming a problem, with the housewives’ movement getting prominent national media coverage, the Dems are still trying to whitewash it. Paul Douglas says that wages have raced ahead of inflation since ’61, but that is beside the point. It is eating into prices, not wages & causing them to skyrocket. Barry & Ed Brooke can speak on inflation with equal conviction, though the L&O issue is also one that we are hammering home to great effect. We look like the moderates & they look like the open-housing extremists in voters’ eyes, which LBJ knows & is desperately trying to paint us as the extremists. It isn’t working now that law enforcement & urban issues are foremost in the voters’ minds. He also keeps talking about governmental overreach, i.e. the massive statist expansion of government over the past 2 years, its post-New Deal apogee. Ironically the blue-collars who might’ve supported this in the past are now demanding law & order which they are not seeing under a Democratic administration. Our film will be screening in a few weeks to push this point home before the country renders its verdict on LBJ on Nov. 8. Title IV finally died though the rest of S. 3296 made its way onto the President’s desk for signature, the liberals are weeping about it already. I voted for the rest of the bill as did the rest of caucus in good conscience. One Democrat in the House who sees this quite clearly is Lee Hamilton in Indiana, who is a moderate & refusing to pander to his constituents over this: saying that they say “haven’t we done enough for the Negro” & then start calling him names. If more Dems, especially the one in the WH, were tuned into these problems like he & BK then we’d be the ones on the run & looking like extremists, not vice-versa as is currently the case.

- Nixon Diaries, Oct. 4


Sen. Richard Nixon (R-CA) speaks in Sacramento on behalf of Republican gubernatorial candidate Craig Hosmer.

U1502847.jpg


The boss has been swinging through all the usual spots in the last 2 weeks before the polls close for his favoured candidates, trying to preserve our gains. Internal polling shows we will hold the House but be massacred on the state level, which bodes ill for redistricting in ’70 & of course, will be spun by the media as a prelude to ’68. Unfortunately for us he will require surgery to fix a gallbladder incision from ’65 & a problem with his vocal polyps. Already the media is spinning this as an acknowledgement that we are going to be wiped out in a couple of Tuesdays since many of our plans have to be cancelled. How can we conceal the fact that thousands of seats have been reserved in Chicago for rallies, secure routes scouted by the SS, hotel rooms reserved in Portland, etc? We can’t but we have to pretend that none of this stuff has been done for appearance’s sake. The main surrogates are Hubert, Bobby & Nixon stumping all over the country to try & bat in some favoured candidates. In Georgia we are secretly hoping for a GOP win after hoping that anyone except Maddox would have won the Democratic nomination, elsewhere we are safe in the South. He is becoming so unpopular in certain areas that we have considered it safer for him not to appear both security-wise & politically, the approval rating has almost dipped below 50% which is the danger zone. In the event that this happens the GOP will consider ’68 open season on us & therefore have to be ready. Nixon is already pushing the ’68 theme by suggesting that Hubert will have to be dumped for Bobby if our numbers don’t improve, being firmly tongue-in-cheek of course. He is next headed for Manila & the Conference with the SEATO allies to discuss Vietnam, but that will have to be delayed until after the election. One thing is for sure: Nixon is running in ’68 without a shadow of a doubt.
- Jenkins Diaries, Oct. 31

President Lyndon Johnson is greeted in the traditional Hawaiian manner on a campaign stop in Honolulu.

U1533045.jpg




Great%20Society%20Comic%20Book.jpg



I’m just about to wrap up what has been an exhausting if revealing cross-country tour. If I had to summarize the feelings expressed in many of these areas, especially the suburbs & blue-collar wards, it would be: “haven’t we done enough for the Negro” & “L&O”. The former sentiment is what I diagnosed earlier with a tad of racism thrown in on occasion, depending on the individual. The latter is a sentiment that is preventable but we have been prescribing the wrong solutions & the wrong cures. As I see it the problem is not money but the programs. There is no point in pouring money down the drain without getting any return on the investment. At least BSDC is coming along rather nicely; I have a meeting booked with Tom Watson & the community elders’ right after the election. Rocky is going to hang on because once again the state party has proven its utter incompetence- we have not won in a quarter-century apart from Harriman’s single term in the mid-‘50s. I have absolutely no desire to get involved in that mess, for as Dad says “local politics is an endless morass”- for once you get in you can never get out, rather like quicksand. California is one hell of a mess, but PB was probably doomed the minute word got out last year that he was in Greece while Watts burned, hence the monotonous Nero ads being played by the local GOP. Nixon is campaigning hard for the nominees down there & they are hoping for a sweep. PB has now started to address their concerns but it is far too late. I asked why he didn’t introduce a crime bill; certainly as a former DA he should know the importance of this? Answer: wanted to deal with this first. You have to win the arguments before trying to win the votes. He looked pissed because I was straining not to roll my eyes.
- RFK Diaries, Nov. 4

Sen. Robert Kennedy (D-NY) talking to a group of children in Bakersfield, CA.



rfk_children_480_01.jpg


U.S. midterm elections, Nov. 8

U.S. House of Representatives elections, 1966

Democratic: 230 seats (-45)
Republican: 205 seats

Incumbent Speaker: John McCormack (D-MA)

U.S. Senate elections, 1966

Democratic: 62 seats (-3)
Republican: 38 seats

Percy (R-IL) defeats Douglas (D-IL): R pickup
Hatfield (R-OR) defeats Duncan (D-OR): R pickup
Parker (R-SC) defeats Hollings (D-SC): R pickup

Incumbent Majority Leader: Mike Mansfield (D-MT)

Arkansas gubernatorial election, 1966
(R) Winthrop Rockefeller: 54.4%
(D) James D. Johnson: 45.6%

Incumbent Governor: Orval Faubus (D)
Governor-elect: Winthrop Rockefeller (R)

California gubernatorial election, 1966
(R) Craig L. Hosmer: 53.1%
(D) Edmund G. Brown: 46.7%

Incumbent Governor: Pat Brown (D)
Governor-elect: Craig Hosmer (R)

Georgia gubernatorial election, 1966
(R) Howard Callaway: 50.4%
(D) Lester Maddox: 49.5%

Incumbent Governor: Carl Sanders (D)
Governor-elect: Bo Callaway (R)

The press has horribly misinterpreted the results of this election, trying to focus on what they consider the few bright spots such as Percy & Brooke’s elections instead of what it really is: a backlash against the urban riots & black demands more generally. Democrats who refocused their message did better: LBJ has said that mistakes were made that will be corrected in January but has not said exactly what measures will be taken up & passed by the Democratic Congress. There is still a raging debate in their caucus about whether or not to take up Bob’s crime bill & it seems that the pros are winning, not the cons. After speaking to him about it he is quite happy about it, for everyone wins: he boosts his centrist, cop-friendly creds, LBJ gets some credit for “reconciliation” or “triangulation”, while the Republicans voting for it give it that blessed media name “bipartisan” which all politicians are supposed to crave. Also would give the impression that the Dems learnt a lesson from this election rather than blithely sailing into oblivion. Whether or not LBJ will still reject it as too draconian is not really a matter of debate: he cannot if he hopes to survive in ’68. Nonetheless this will be a token measure, not a true measure of LBJ’s willingness to tack center. He is still & will always be a New Dealer & it would be foolish to posit any other position. After the lame-duck is over I will head back to Houston for Xmas, but first we have to get down there for Thanksgiving with the family. No one wants to be stuck here on Thanksgiving & there is little of note on the agenda otherwise. He will also introduce the welfare bill at a later date but that will almost certainly be vetoed by LBJ for going much too far in the WH’s view. Nonetheless, good to float a balloon to see whether it will fly or pop.

- Bush Diaries, Nov. 21





“He might sign this, but he’ll never sign PRWO. Not just hating my guts but hating the idea that maybe the New Deal is passé and we won’t keep our coalition together on the current path. Nor will the current path spell anything but President Nixon in ’68.”
- Bob to Ted Kennedy, Dec. 3


1) BSDC= Bedford-Stuyvesant Development Corporation. This was RFK's personal PPP (public-private partnership) set up in Bed-Stuy as a testing ground for his urban development ideas in 1965. IOTL it was initially heavily reliant on his personal clout but remained a modest success after his death. The aim was to get businesses to create jobs in poor neighbourhoods, primarily manufacturing.
 
Last edited:
Man, It reminds me how much of an egotistical SOB, Wallace was, running his cancer-stricken wife hard on the campaign trail...which probably accelerated her death more than anything. Nice couple of wrapups before the '66 midterms as LBJ will probably have to become more pragmatic and not so dogmatic with a somewhat smaller Democratic Congressional Majority. I would really like to see Bobby's Urban Enterprize Zone Act get pushed through congress as his first true Legislative plans. Alot of smart solutions to a really comprhenesive problem...And please keep Nixon in the Senate as long as possible, plus I think a 1968 Barry Goldwater campaign would be much stronger than the one he offered IOTL.
 

Art

Monthly Donor
This reminds me of a A. H. book A Disturbance of Fate...

Which has as it's P. O. D. Robert Kennedy surviving the Sirhan-Sirhan assasination. Lots of the same characters. Things looking black for the Democrats! Hope "Tricky Dick" and "'Ickle Ronnie" come to very bad ends INDEED.
 
The 90th has convened which means that the Great Society as LBJ envisioned it has now been fully halted courtesy of the emergency brake applied in November. We don’t have a majority but combined with the Southerners there is a conservative majority in the House to be used to our advantage. Scuttlebutt on the Hill is that LBJ will emphasize a reconciliatory message in his upcoming SOTU next week; somehow I doubt that very much. He has absorbed the results of the election apparently but not the long-term consequences of it, not the throwing of a few bones to us but real, constructive ideological shifting. The first bone that will be thrown to us is the passage of Bob’s VCCLA for all the reasons I mentioned last month, but if PRWO makes it out of committee (damn near impossible here in the Senate) it will be passed by the House but either die here or will get vetoed by LBJ as far too draconian. In the House Lee Hamilton has agreed to co-sponsor it, which will allow it to pass the House unscathed but fail up here. Otherwise the holidays were quite festive as we are all quite excited about taking LBJ on in ’68 now that the country has registered its intense disapproval of his agenda, but there is a lot of work left to do. I’m pretty sure RN is running next year even if he hasn’t made his intentions clear yet. I did not get any committee promotions since the only one of ours who retired was Saltonstall & room needs to be made for the freshmen. RN has all the committee assignments he wants while due to the retirements Bob gets an office upgrade, not that much bigger than his old one but newer & better-looking as well. The newcomers seem eager to get down to work even though Hatfield is well known as a Vietnam dove- one of the few races where the Democrat was more hawkish than the Republican.

- Bush Diaries, Jan. 5, 1967


President Johnson delivers his State of the Union message, Jan. 12.

U1578307.jpg



I tabled VCCLA yesterday after it passed through HELP & Judiciary relatively unscathed & is now being debated on the floor. There is some outcry from the liberals about how draconian it is, as expected. Nonetheless this is a major victory in that LBJ has been forced to admit that the answer is not spending more but efficient use of available resources. I had a good conversation with Hubert yesterday but he told me not to even bothering tabling PRWO when this is done, Johnson won’t let it get out of committee & would see that it would be killed in the Senate. IMO this is further proof that he does not foresee the long-term consequences of this. It is not just me, or one bill, it is the ideological direction of our party that is the underlying & ignored issue. In this I am virtually alone- Lee Hamilton agrees with me, a few in the House, plus Birch Bayh here in the Senate. That is nowhere near enough, the ones who are most receptive to my way of thinking right now are mostly Southerners, the young generation to whom the ND is not the Holy Grail as it is for those of a generation older than me. Hence why the project is being delayed for another 2-3 years until more seeds can be planted, for there is no point in announcing a party to which no one shows up, right? Even if the project is only in its rudimentary planning phases it is a long-term commitment I can look forward to. No changes in my committee assignments but an office upgrade was offered & accepted. MM did promise me a promotion to FR, finally, in the 91st, which is what I’ve been hoping for all along anyways. Ted didn’t take the FRC offer but wanted to stick with domestic committees, particularly HELP. That’s where I’m chairman of the ad hoc committee on Indian education- planning a field trip for the spring.

- RFK Diaries, Jan. 29

Sen. Robert Kennedy (D-NY) in his Senate office, February 3.
AAKW001034.jpg


The Kennedy brothers share a laugh on the steps of Capitol Hill.

U1482141.jpg



VCCLA was passed by the House 299-136, with 94 Democrats voting for the bill & will be signed by LBJ next week. It is known in the press either by its initials or as “Kennedy-Hamilton” given that Hamilton was the cosponsor of RFK’s bill in the House. The scale of Democratic divisions indicates that mostly Southerners & a few Northerners who represent urban areas voted for it, while the liberals voted against it. That would not have been possible in the 89th; it is in the 90th where our proposals have a decent shot in the House but no chance on this side of Capitol Hill. I am planning another overseas trip this summer to Europe in order to meet with their leaders, specifically Wilson, CDG & Kiesinger along with the Pope to ascertain their view of our foreign policy. All my traveling will inevitably spark speculation about ’68 when I haven’t even decided on my plans for next year yet. The media likes to create any sort of controversy where it doesn’t exist, that’s their job. I spoke to GB today- he agrees with me that the SOTU shows little willingness to compromise with us because we only have de facto control of the House while they still dominate the Senate. It will take up to 4-5 cycles to regain the Senate majority, if all the cards fall our way & not theirs as I hope. Speaking of next year: Barry is thinking of running, Romney is definitely running. Whether or not Rocky runs again after being crushed in ’64 is open to question, after all I lost by a squeaker while he lost by a country mile. However I am enjoying being back here in the Senate- & a loss to LBJ at this moment of vulnerability would completely wreck any chances I have of becoming president. If I ran & lost Californians would resent that very much in ’70, seeing me as playing career hopscotch on their backs. I’ll make the decision before year’s end.
- Nixon Diaries, Feb. 5

Sen. Richard Nixon (R-CA), ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, talks to British Prime Minister Harold Wilson before their meeting at No 10. Foreign Secretary Michael Stewart is at right.

U1623101.jpg



The boss has signed VCCLA into law at a ceremony yesterday with RFK & Lee Hamilton both present, the media is already spinning this as a move to the center & “reconciliation” with Kennedy when neither is the case. We are merely adjusting to the new political reality of having to work with a much more conservative House in the 90th than we did in the 89th. He also pocket-vetoed his & Bush’s bill to repeal the Chicken Tax- we are definitely not pissing away labour support in the Midwest next year. Industrial-state Democrats are happy, as is the AFL-CIO with this decision. Already the ads hitting them for wanting to outsource American jobs to Germany are being aired by the DNC- though against the GOP, not against Kennedy. Next week will be a meeting with the legislative leadership to discuss the priorities outlined in SOTU, namely more bipartisan cooperation especially in areas where there is room for it such as in consumer protection, foreign aid & the environment. The deficit is still high but steadily being decreased, it should be eliminated by the end of his second term if the GOP cooperates & continue funding of the current GS programs. Model Cities is first on the list & the Republicans will be split down the middle on this in the House, allowing us to pass it without too many obstructions. The SOTU was not as well received by the Republicans as we thought even though their near-victory in the House was acknowledged & the President promised to consult them more. These ingrates will never be satisfied unless we enact their agenda instead of ours.
- Jenkins Diaries, Feb. 26


President Johnson shares a laugh with Sen. Robert Kennedy (D-NY) at the signing of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, written by Kennedy and co-sponsored by Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-IN, in background) Feb. 12.

BE045449.jpg


I am currently on a tour of Asian countries to shore up support for us among the SEATO allies, but am maintaining an ear back in domestic affairs as well. Lyndon signed VCCLA after much prodding from the GOP but he detested every minute of it. Bobby must’ve been quietly thrilled at rubbing Lyndon’s nose in it. In order to appease the public he had to sign one of his bills even though Lyndon had practically sworn to me that his bills would never be let through his veto pen before the election. That still applies to the other 2 which will not make it through the Senate, even if they do in the House. It is ridiculous to think that Nixon is not doing anything that is not purely oriented towards running next year. Hell at this rate I wouldn’t be surprised if he announced before the year was out, though I doubt it. There are rumours that Goldwater is thinking of running again, but I doubt that he’d run against Nixon. Something is not quite right here (pun intended) & I will certainly investigate further when I get home. SVN is organizing its first elections for September & I am tapped to lead our delegation there along with Fulbright & Nixon who will be representing both sides on the FRC.
- Humphrey Diaries, Mar. 31


Vice President Hubert Humphrey and South Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Cao Ky are mobbed by Saigon schoolchildren on a visit to Vietnam, Mar. 25.
NA008215.jpg


1) 1967 SOTU
2) VCCLEA
 
Last edited:
At the April Republican National Committee meeting in New Orleans, as Romney’s surrogates buttered up the press to follow along on the governor’s lecture tour, two Southerners shopped around a plan for Republican unity in 1967. Fred LaRue, the Mississippi national committeeman, had been a Goldwater field organizer in 1964. Peter O’Donnell, the chairman of the Texas Republican Party, had chaired Barry Goldwater’s legendary nominating organization and there were suggestions he might do so again. They buttonholed Republicans and reporters, arguing that the best way to avoid the party-killing rancour their efforts had lamentably produced in 1964 was not for anyone to declare his candidacy but for everyone to declare their candidacy. Republicans had such a wealth of talent- Romney of Michigan, Rockefeller and Javits of New York, John Tower of Texas, Rockefeller of Arkansas, Kirk of Florida, Percy of Illinois, Shaffer of Pennsylvania, etc. - that as many as possible should declare themselves favourite-son presidential candidates, to keep their states’ delegations in abeyance until the party could quietly settle on a consensus ticket. They succeeded. Favourite-son boomlets for second-tier officeholders, who, prima donnas to a man, encouraged the attention, spread from sea to shining sea. In San Diego, Richard Nixon smiled. LaRue and O’Donnell were his secret agents. Sowing a dozen or more presidential “contenders” starved the five or six who actually were contenders of attention, leaving Nixon to plot behind the scenes in peace. In the middle of April Nixon denied he was running for president by telling the Saturday Evening Post that if he was “I’d have it locked up by now.” On April 14 he met with his team at the Ambassador. Nixon told them not to even tell their closest friends about the meeting, clinching the plea with Nixonian skill: “WE don’t want to hurt the feelings of anyone they’ve left out,” he said- signifying to those present that they were his true inner circle.

[A Time to Remember]

Sens. Richard Nixon (R-CA) and Jacob Javits (R-NY) with Gov. Nelson Rockefeller (R-NY) at a dinner marking Javits' 21st anniversary in public life, Apr. 17.

BE020517.jpg


There is a new emergent threat that is heralding a split in the CRM & is getting a good deal of attention in the press- Black Power, with Newton, Seale & et al as the leaders. MLK has lost control of the movement which has now split itself into 2: the regulars & the extremists, including the Black Panthers. We are going to be holding hearings on this & Lister Hill, the HELP chair, is thoroughly unsympathetic to any of these viewpoints. I will confine my questioning to telling them that this sort of thing will set back the CR cause in the country, but that is for show- I know damn well that this is not their aim. Fortunately with this new legislation passed we can seriously crack down on crime in these areas, next is Model Cities. I wholly disagree with the entire methodology used in MC & will say so when it comes up for a vote later in the year. Middle East is also heating up ever since a quick SO raid across the Jordanian border last month turned into a clusterfuck of a firefight requiring massive reinforcements, including armoured & CAS just to secure a withdrawal. War is looking increasingly likely & both the Arab states & Israel must be restrained before it breaks out again in the region. I am due to attend a fundraiser for AIPAC later this week & be accompanied by Rocky & Javits at the head table- go figure, even if the conversation will be interesting. More speculation about next year in the press- but why do I get the vibe that Nixon is seeking to be merely kingmaker, not king, this year? He’s been jetting all over the world & just got back last week from his tour, which is no doubt designed to get his name back in the news again after a brief absence. Not that either G or I know about it, he’s even more remote towards us than a pasha who’s lost their voice.
- RFK Diaries, Apr. 30

Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (D-N.Y.) (left) chats with Floyd B. McKissick, head of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) during a break in the Senate Government Operations subcommittee's hearing on urban development today. Kennedy, a frequent defender of civil rights causes, clashed with McKissick during the hearing over the "black power" concept. Kennedy accused McKissick of hindering rather than helping Negroes with his "black power" advocacy.

[Apr. 25, 1967]

U1538769.jpg


After the foreign trip, I’m somewhat disappointed to be back here but there is work to be done before Congress adjourns in August. I’ve already met with a few people about next year’s plans & passed the word around while I continue strategizing in peace. Press is already full of speculation over whether or not I’ll run again & I’m quite happy to encourage them. Already Romney & Rocky have started making their intentions known, as has Barry, to whom I spoke at length yesterday. All 3 are definitely running which is excellent news. Back at FRC there is talk of Vietnam, but more often of what is going on elsewhere, particularly in Europe & Latin America, not so much in Asia. JWF has been pushing for more engagement with Europe with the WH not responding effectively if at all- LBJ is just not interested in going abroad. Apart from Adenauer’s funeral last year he hasn’t been at all, & our relations with FRG are being harmed by the Chicken Tax whose repeal he vetoed to appease Big Labour. We’re not even on speaking terms with France, let alone having a good relationship with them. That is CDG’s goal of course- to be distant cousins at the best of times, but still with us at a crunch as he proved in ’62. I’m not sure that LBJ grasps that or even cares. Or as one Embassy source once told me what CDG really thinks of him: “I like Johnson; he doesn’t even bother to pretend he’s thinking.” If that ever got out in the media it would cause serious damage to Franco-American relations. LBJ’s approval rating went back up to 50% after signing those bills which means we still have some work to do- though anything can change in the second half of the year. I have no doubts that eventually the blossoming friendship between GB and RFK will boomerang in their faces one day, most likely to GB given how much of a leper Bobby is on this side.

- Nixon Diaries, May 4

U.S. Senator Richard Nixon chats with Chancellor Kurt-Georg Kiesinger prior to their hour-long private meeting at the Chancellery, May 11.

U1548571.jpg



The Middle East is heating up again as Israel & the Arab states are ever closer to the brink of war. Scuttlebutt is that the trio are planning a preemptive strike, which means that Israel probably is as well. It all depends on who strikes first in that case. Newark is a tinderbox waiting to blow up, all that it needs is a single trigger to send that whole city up in flames & Addonzio & Hughes are not lifting a finger to do anything to prevent it. This is going to be one fiery summer, even more than the past 2 were. I fear for the future of our country if urban rioting is to become an annual summer ritual, as does practically everyone I know. At least our Canadian friends are getting to enjoy their centennial amidst a burst of national pride- the President is going up there to meet with Pearson & tour our pavilion, which will certainly be a boost to bilateral relations. Bob, as usual, is planning to head up there for some skiing this winter as is his wont; he’s also quite concerned about the Mideast situation. Israel might acquire strategic depth, but at the cost of having to administer the Arab inhabitants of those territories, who will hardly be thrilled at being under Israeli control. So there’s a trade-off to be made there: I say the best solution in case of preemptive war would be to not permanently keep the territories but use them as bargaining chips. George says it is absolute mayhem up at New Haven, chock full of antiwarriors & hippies but no black militants, fortunately- thankful none of them go to schools where that might be a problem.

- Bush Diaries, May 30

President Johnson with Canadian Prime Minister Lester Pearson at the latter's summer home outside Ottawa.

U1528030.jpg


That was quick: a buffer zone and strategic depth in all of 2 days! Despite both our sides’ best efforts to prevent an outbreak of war it still went through anyways, & the Israelis got the Golan, Gaza & East Jerusalem. This will probably trigger a bout of Arab revanchism, especially in Egypt who got thoroughly destroyed by Israel, including their entire air force on the ground, more of a surprise attack than Pearl Harbour ever was. Already the UNSC has passed 242 but Israel is ignoring them as usual. I’m due to head there later in the summer on Lyndon’s behalf to meet with Eshkol & senior Israeli officials to discuss our relationship, which has been quite strong for the past 7 years, albeit hindered due to JFK’s allowing the NNP issue to get in the way of it. Now that this issue has been quietly dealt with there should be no further problems- though I did meet with Ribicoff, Javits, Rocky & Bobby the other day to discuss it & what AIPAC thinks. We are also keeping a close eye on what is happening in the cities because the BP people have been quite active lately & all it takes is one spark for a whole city to go up in flames.

- Humphrey Diaries, June 27

50322972.jpg
 
After this Israeli mess, focus has shifted back here to domestic affairs once again. We are all keeping an eye on the major cities, any of which could go up like a tinderbox at any moment. Particularly our eyes are on NYC, Detroit & Newark where racial problems are reaching a boiling point. More cops than ever are on the street but it only takes one small incident to create a massive riot. The boss wants more authority to deal with this- & particularly important for George Romney, who is probably running next year. His candidacy will be severely undermined, to say the least, if he has to call on federal troops or deploy the National Guard into Detroit. NJ is a lost cause with neither Hughes nor Addonzio willing to tackle the underlying issues. The boss has been trying to get in contact with them with little to no response. Politically there is still a good deal of speculation about the potential GOP field: all of us think that Nixon, Romney, Rockefeller & Goldwater will be the candidates this cycle, with a few favourite sons thrown in to mix it up a bit. He is definitely running for reelection however, both he & Lady Bird agree that his health will be able to take another 4 years in office as we all hoped. The key is to protect the Great Society from both the Republicans who would turn back the clock & Democrats who want to give up all the values we hold dear for policies that the boss sees in some respects as Republican-lite. I really do not know where the media gets the idea of RFK as some sort of liberal messiah- are they covering the same man I know & the President knows? Because judging from their coverage, you’d think otherwise.

- Jenkins Diaries, July 6

0707_newark.jpg


Johnson had not fully seen the oncoming political squeeze. “Push ahead full tilt,” he had said on one of his first days as president, when his new economic adviser told him President Kennedy had been considering a poverty initiative- a program on which President Kennedy was proceeding exceedingly cautiously, for fear of offending middle-class whites. Now, middle-class whites were indeed sorely offended by the War on Poverty. Lyndon Johnson’s poverty programs were doing, after all, what they were supposed to be doing: redistributing wealth, and thus redistributing power. When polled in 1961, 59 percent of the electorate said the federal government bore responsibility to ensure that every American had an adequate job and income. Then the government started making modest steps towards that goal, and by 1969, only 31 percent still thought that. The income of non-whites had started rising faster than the income of whites, and though the gap was not nearly closed, many whites’ incomes were beginning to stagnate, even, in real terms, to fall. The War on Poverty came out of their hard-earned tax dollars- draining money, some whites thought, toward ungrateful rioters. Who, of course, still demanded their welfare checks? A White House study found that three-quarters of white Bostonians thought most welfare cases were fraudulent. The backlash against the War on Poverty had always been latent. Civil rats showed that backlash now to be mature- as in places such as Detroit, the races made ready for war. The president called a cabinet meeting, demanding to know whether the Communists were behind the riots. His new attorney general, Ramsey Clark, was a Texas boy, a marine, the son of Truman’s law and order attorney general, Tom Clark, a Supreme Court justice who had written the ruling in favour of Arizona in Miranda. But this Clark said there simply wasn’t evidence for blaming communists.

[A Time to Remember]

Newark police stand guard while firemen douse a burning building following the riots.


KernerNewark1967.jpg


Both Detroit & Newark went up in flames earlier this month as expected- but the underlying causes still remain. Even if a cop doesn’t screw up an ordinary pullover or a regular saloon drug bust, all the underlying causes are still there. You can take away the match but the gasoline, lack of fire escapes or safety regs, which are the endemic poverty & crime rates, are still there, so it will happen eventually. There are 8 dead in Newark, 43 in Detroit but ~500 injured & the practical levelling of the downtown core. Both the Airborne & National Guard had to be deployed to restore law & order in Detroit, only the National Guard in New Jersey. There doesn’t seem to be much concern about the Negro’s plight, only about L&O among the white population. LBJ has created a commission- the Kerner Commission- which again doesn’t take the other part of the equation, the riots themselves, into account. I foresee that this problem will take a while yet to resolve- when you remove the cover from a pot that’s been boiling for a century it isn’t going to be all peaches & roses. Nor will it last for much longer as many have been predicting in the media. Personally I think Johnson’s response to the urban crisis will ultimately be the hinge of his reelection if the GOP nominates a member of their centrist wing like Nixon or Rocky. Romney’s credibility is shot to pieces now with the Detroit riot taking place on his watch. Not his fault- he’s been championing civil rights for years- but he’s finished. Never really understood why they kept pushing him so hard. Do they really think the GOP base will accept a Mormon? If so, I’d like to sell them the Brooklyn Bridge, or maybe the Triborough (which is still my preferred commute).

- RFK Diaries, Aug. 7

85871.jpg


Another article, drafted by Pat Buchanan, came out in Reader’s Digest for the masses behind their white picket fences called “What Has Happened to America?” Now that Johnson and Romney were tangled up in a post-riot battle of legalistic recrimination, the strategic conditions were finally propitious for Nixon to reintroduce himself as a crusader for law and order. “Just three years ago this nation seemed to be completing its greatest decade of racial progress,” the article began. Now the country was “among the most violent and lawless in the history of free peoples.” Racial animosity was only the “most visible” cause. The riots were “the most virulent symptoms to date of another and in some ways graver, national disorder- the decline in respect for public authority and the rule of law in America... The symptoms are everywhere manifest: in the public attitude towards police, in the mounting traffic in illicit drugs, in the volume of teenage arrests, in campus disorders and the growth of white-collar crime... Far from becoming a great society, ours is becoming a lawless society.” The linkages were now familiar. What made it original was the deflection of the blame onto the Franklins. “Our opinion-makers have gone too far in promoting the doctrine that when a law is broken, society, not the criminal, is to blame. Our teachers, preachers and politicians have gone too far in advocating he idea that each individual should determine what laws are good and what laws are bad, and that he should then obey the law he likes and disobey the law he dislikes. This country cannot temporize or equivocate in this showdown with anarchy... Immediate and decisive force must be the first response.” Then he produced a refrain: the “primary civil right was to be protected from domestic violence.” Which was a point Robert Kennedy had made in an August interview with the National Review’s editorial board: “before supplies can be landed, the LZ must be secured.” But he was in a minority in his own party, allowing Nixon to blast the Democrats as more concerned with coddling rioters than domestic security.

- The Journeyman: Richard Nixon by Newt Gingrich

South Vietnamese presidential election, Sept. 2
Nguyen Van Thieu/ Nguyen Cao Ky: 35.1%
Troung Ding Dzu: 17.4%
Phen Khac Suu: 13.1%
Tran Van Huong: 12.6%

Incumbent President: none, position last held by Ngo Dinh Diem (1963)
President-elect: Nguyen Van Thieu (I)





South Vietnam went as we knew it would, perfectly fair & free. USE said that in a fair & free election they would receive between 30 & 50%, the result being 35%. Not that much else was possible in a field of four top candidates & a few minor ones without massive fraud. At least the knowledge of a very modest mandate might compel them to govern modestly as well. On my trip there it seems that Ky is quite unhappy with having to take second place to Thieu, but it is always better to have a competent, quiet administrator like Thieu rather than a flamboyant charismatic like Ky, whose ultimate loyalty is to himself. Meanwhile here at home the Commission is due to report before Christmas, dropping what could either be a massive bombshell or a reconfirmation onto Lyndon’s lap just before the presidential election kicks off. Actually, it already has, seeing that Romney, Nixon, and Rocky & Goldwater all have campaign organizations in place. The GOP strategy is going to be simple: we Democrats are to blame for the so-called permissive society that allowed this urban violence to take place. Our strategy is simple: securing the gains of the Great Society from the Republicans, which should be easy if they nominate a conservative.

- Humphrey Diaries, Sept. 24

1) Forgot to cover this: Miranda goes the other way ITTL, in favor of Arizona with all the attendant consequences.

2) Hugh D'Addonzio was the last non-black mayor of Newark. A frighteningly corrupt machinist who was later recorded taking a bribe from a Mafia associate by the FBI.

3) Time's coverage can be found here. Huong is a former Saigon mayor and rigidly honest, Phen is a former PM and Speaker of the Constituent Assembly, Dzu a demagogic peace advocate. To read more I'd recommend Karnow or the Time archives.
 
Awesome update RB, now I did have a question on wheter or not Bobby still makes his tour of Appalachia ITTL? It's really a shame that many of the same conditions that he documented during the mid sixities, still afflict the region nearly a half century later. Maybe he can pettion LBJ to create a new TVA for Infrastructure and Education reform...

Chris Komm said:
Just over three months before he was assassinated, Kennedy took a two-day, 200-mile tour across eastern Kentucky to investigate the state of poverty in America. Kennedy's Appalachian tour, which artist John Malpede recently captured in his RFK Performance Project, has achieved an almost mythic status, subsequently imitated by Jesse Jackson, Jr., Paul Wellstone and John Edwards.

Malpede found that many in Kentucky were stirred by Kennedy's visit, especially a three-and-a-half-hour "hearing" he held in a packed school gym in Letcher County (you can read a transcript of the hearing here). As Nell Fields remembers:

“It taught the value of hope in the face of despair. Something happened inside of people.”

Kennedy's aides didn't expect the avalanche of media coverage that followed, which helped propel Appalachia, poverty and Kennedy himself onto the national radar.

Dee Davis of the Center for Rural Strategies, who lived in east Kentucky when Kennedy visited in 1968, recently reflected on NPR that the challenges facing Appalachia have since again faded from view, with disastrous consequences:

When no one shows up to witness the obliteration of mountaintops — vast hillsides being shoved into creek beds — then desperate mining practices flourish.

When the rest of the country never sees the broken families and children cut adrift from addiction, then a pharmaceutical company can get off with a fine and a pat on the rump for years of dumping pain drugs like OxyContin into these rural communities.

People will tell you government doesn't work. But I've seen it work. It starts with somebody showing up and making an effort. I have also seen it fail.

Mostly that happens when no one's paying attention.

Perhaps if the media and America had been paying more attention -- and political leaders offered real solutions -- one wouldn't still see the level of racial resentment and economic injustice that have recently come on display in Kentucky and Appalachia.
Haymond520.jpg
 
Great work Beav!!!

One question though, positions on committees are based on seniority, if Nixon has only been in the senate a few years, how is he the ranking Republican on Foreign Affairs?
 
Nixon borrowed from University of Chicago economist Milton Friedman the negative income tax as a welfare supplement. He concluded that sending school buses loaded with children across metropolitan areas was insane, educationally, sociologically, and politically; and that the black ghettos had to be improved by the private sector, incentivized by the government. Nixon’s policy team furnished him with ample arguments and catchy speech phrases that debunked traditional levelling of slums, population movement, and increased government supervision of growing numbers of the underprivileged. It was clear to Nixon that the key to raising the living standards of the poor was job creation, and the two keys to reducing the crime rate were less unemployment and more police. In a well-publicized Senate debate in early October 1967, Robert Kennedy attacked Nixon’s negative income tax proposal as an “open door to welfare fraud that in order to be prevented would spin the web of federal bureaucracy even larger, would encourage welfare dependency and is entirely lacking in means testing. Were it adopted, the incentive to work would be diminished due to the guarantee of income regardless of employment status by its lack of a cut-off date.” Kennedy’s own proposals, PRWOR and TANF, had died in a Senate vote earlier in the year, with only 5 Democrats joining him and the 38 Republicans for both. Their objectives were different: Nixon sought a new welfare system while Kennedy proposed to radically overhaul the current one, yet as The New Republic noted, “the reprehensible spectacle of Bobby Kennedy asserting that Richard Nixon was too soft on welfare seems to confirm liberals’ opinion of Kennedy, which has never been very high. While we commend both senators for adding some much-needed originality into an increasingly sterile debate, we can endorse neither Kennedy’s nor Nixon’s proposals, which are more in line with the party of Goldwater than the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson.”

[The Journeyman]

57655832.jpg


U1546880.jpg


Meanwhile the nation’s governors spent the third week of October on a cruise ship, dancing political dances, behaving the way politicians do, as if nothing had changed since the times of James Garfield. The annual conference of the National Association of Governors was where pols let their hair down in exotic locales, gossiped, jockeyed, sized up who was who, flaunted their privileges as men who ran the world. This year the setting was the S.S. Independence, steaming to the Virgin Islands. Reporters merrily mutinied for better access, signing a “Press Power” manifesto banning “honky” governors from the media lounge, demanding bussing from the upper to upper decks. Lobster was on the menu every day. Nelson Rockefeller downed seasickness pills and said that while it was flattering to be on the cover of Time, “I’m not a candidate, I’m not going to be a candidate, and I don’t want to be president.” (No one quite believed him. Since his 1959 inauguration, the oil heir was always drafting himself for president, then ostentatiously withdrawing himself from consideration, then drafting himself back in at the last minute.) Onboard, Rocky was seen everywhere huddling with Romney. Romney thought he’d received a pledge in blood from him that Rocky was out for good and had laid plans for an official candidacy announcement. But then there were those polls: Rocky led LBJ by 8 points while Nixon and Romney were ahead by only four, while Goldwater trailed by 3. As the press corps had sung at the last Gridiron Dinner: “His mouth tells you no! No! But there’s yes! Yes in his eyes!” Another onboard Johnson proxy, John Connally, governor of Texas, was locked in his cabin with aides, trying to figure out the next move for the president. It turned out to be a duck-out: cancelling the “spontaneous” presidential drop-in on the governors’ final port of call.

[A Time to Remember]

Sen. Richard Nixon (R-CA) meets with Gov. George Romney (R-MI) after the National Governors Association meeting in the Virgin Islands.


U1630285.jpg


Texas Gov. John Connally (D) at the NGA conference.

92925373.jpg



Boston had a mayoral election that November of 1967. The liberal incumbent, Kevin White, faced a challenge from the antibusing hero of the Boston School Committee, Louise Day Hicks. “I have guarded your children well,” she would say. “I will continue to defend the neighbourhood school as long as I have a breath left in my body.” There were seventy thousand vacant desks in Boston’s white neighbourhoods. But for the city to bus them there, Hicks said, would create an “unfair advantage” for black children. A couple of years before, black parents, exploiting an open-enrolment loophole that let them choose their children’s schools if they provided the transportation, had put up funds to run their own private bus service. Hicks nastily put up bureaucratic roadblocks to stop Operation Exodus. Boston’s Cardinal Cushing told her he was considering joining the civil rights groups marching against her. “Your Eminence,” she responded, “if you had done that, I hope you would have marched right upstairs to my office on the third floor so I could have handed you my resignation in person.” The cardinal expressed astonishment that she would resign from the school committee. She replied, “No Your Eminence. I didn’t mean from the school committee. I mean my resignation from the Catholic Church.” Hicks’ was helped when Newsweek featured her on the cover in an article that was supposed to hurt her. They described her supporters as a “comic strip gallery of tipplers and brawlers and their tinselled overdressed dolls... the men queued up to give Louise their best, unscrewing cigar butts from their chins to buss her noisily on the cheek, or pumping her arm as if it were a jack handle under a truck.” Orthogonian-style, she featured the article in her advertisement. She won the Boston mayoralty by 14,363 votes. Would the Democratic Party be able to hold the working-class vote against both the GOP and George Wallace?
[A Time to Remember]

Boston's mayor-elect, Louise Day Hicks, delivers her victory speech, Nov. 2.


250px-Louise_Day_Hicks_in_1969.jpg



My decision not to run in 1968 was one that has, in my opinion, been misinterpreted by many historians and journalists over the years. Certainly Johnson was vulnerable: I was polling between four to seven points ahead of him depending on the poll or the day of the week. But I had made a pledge to Californians in 1964 to serve a full term in the Senate and I wanted to honour that promise to them. Having lost the governorship in 1962 in part due to suspicion that I was playing career hopscotch, I wanted to nip that perception in the bud. Second Johnson was less vulnerable than he seemed at the time, for the Democratic divisions on both left and right was still not publicized or formalized as they would be in later years. In June Robert Kennedy had given a florid toast to LBJ at a New York fundraiser, praising “the height of his aim, the breadth of his achievements, the record of his past, and the promise of his future.” Finally, I felt that our candidates: Romney, Rockefeller, Goldwater, were all excellent potential nominees and saw no need to enter. My domestic and foreign concerns were all represented. Despite Romney’s candidacy straining credulity to seemingly all Republicans not affiliated with the national media, both Rockefeller and Goldwater offered a sharp, clear policy contrast that would engender a healthy debate about our direction ideologically and policy-wise. That was not the death of my presidential dream, but also provided me with a chance to play kingmaker given that I had generally good relations with all three camps: indeed Goldwater had promised to support me in 1965 if I ran in ’68. Since I did not, I repaid him the favour, at least privately while publicly maintaining an air of neutrality. The announcement “that under no circumstances shall I seek the Republican presidential nomination in 1968, nor will I accept a draft” was made on November 30th, just 2 weeks before Congress adjourned for the Christmas holidays.

[RN: The Memoirs of Richard Nixon]

Sen. Richard Nixon (R-CA) told Walter Cronkite last night [Nov. 30] that he would not be a presidential candidate in 1968.

53238325.jpg


The year has now come to a close & it has been a rather dull one except for Nixon announcing that he would not be a candidate. I had thought it possible initially but then dismissed it as impossibility: what would quite possibly be his last & best shot thrown away? However there was the pledge to California voters to serve a full term & the gubernatorial run was probably partially lost due to the fact that he was perceived as playing career hopscotch. That can be fatal amongst the voters if it is allowed to take permanent root. I for one am happy to sit this one out, nor do I think after 3 terms in the WH our prospects are ripe in ’72- so it will be likely another 8 years before I run for the Oval Office. If the GOP thinks that Romney or Goldwater can defeat Johnson then they’re off their rockers. Rockefeller got crushed last time, Romney’s overblown & Goldwater is too conservative for the country as it currently stands. He’d be fine as a Democrat in the late 19th century, but not as a 1968 Republican presidential candidate. My plans for next year are to lay low & support LBJ at the convention. I don’t want the keynoter though I will get a primetime speech- false flattery which I despise but have to utter nonetheless to avoid animosity. After November when no one can accuse me of sabotaging Johnson’s reelection bid is when I will start the project.

- RFK Diaries, Dec. 22

OUT19443386.jpg
 
Great work Beav!!!

One question though, positions on committees are based on seniority, if Nixon has only been in the senate a few years, how is he the ranking Republican on Foreign Affairs?

Because it depends on a whole bunch of other things. (In this case #1-5, 7 and 10- California overtook NY in EV by 1972 but had 40 EV to NY's 43 throughout the '60s) If the party leader is amenable that can be waived. JFK was appointed to Foreign Relations by LBJ despite having served only 2 years. Ev Dirksen is an old friend of Nixon's and the caucus doesn't object, because Nixon is their top foreign policy expert. For the Dems, IOTL RFK persuaded Mansfield to create an ad hoc Indian Affairs subcommittee on the Health and Labor Committee (the former later became the full Indian Affairs Committee we know today, the latter is today known as HELP, or Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) and have him chair it because he knew the most about the subject, despite having only 2 years in the Senate. Rules are flexible.

I should have the first half of 1968 up tonight. Tomorrow you'll know if LBJ wins a second term or he falls to a Republican rival.
 
Top