I wonder what butterfly effects this timeline will have towards a certain group of Minnesotan puppeteers in a few years.
I'd actually let Warner Bros. help them out. I mean, with the help of the world's largest Looney Bin, I feel like MST3K could actually enter the mainstream. Plus, WB is among Disney's biggest rivals, and with the creator of the Muppets in their staff, I'm pretty sure that there'd be a battle between WB, Universal, and Turner to see who will be able to work with Tom Servo and Crow.I wonder what butterfly effects this timeline will have towards a certain group of Minnesotan puppeteers in a few years.
I think keeping them independent will keep corporate oversight from what they can and can't see or say.I'd actually let Warner Bros. help them out. I mean, with the help of the world's largest Looney Bin, I feel like MST3K could actually enter the mainstream. Plus, WB is among Disney's biggest rivals, and with the creator of the Muppets in their staff, I'm pretty sure that there'd be a battle between WB, Universal, and Turner to see who will be able to work with Tom Servo and Crow.
I didn't say that corporate meddling would happen if MST3K were to partner up with someone. I was thinking more along the lines of their usual episodes, but with a higher given budget. That's all. It's just the original show, but with bigger production values.I think keeping them independent will keep corporate oversight from what they can and can't see or say.
Part of the charm is the smaller budget, less money generally mean more creative and originality. A number of different films have fallen into that trap. (Of course I can't think of any).I didn't say that corporate meddling would happen if MST3K were to partner up with someone. I was thinking more along the lines of their usual episodes, but with a higher given budget. That's all. It's just the original show, but with bigger production values.
First Deadpool, with a 'low' $58M budget, when the typical Superhero film was over $100M, some well over, like Spiderman, Thor and Iron Man, over $140MPart of the charm is the smaller budget, less money generally mean more creative and originality. A number of different films have fallen into that trap. (Of course I can't think of any).
I was thinking more along the lines of Paranormal Activity vs. Paranormal Activity 2 or Pitch Black vs. Chronicles of Riddick.First Deadpool, with a 'low' $58M budget, when the typical Superhero film was over $100M, some well over, like Spiderman, Thor and Iron Man, over $140M
Was Trinity not available?
Also, I've always wondered what Turner would actually do with the Columbia properties. Is CBS going to be rebranded as the alternate TNT here, or will CBS and TBS swap names, with TBS being the broadcast company and CBS joining CNN as the cable company since they have all the archival stuff Ted's built his empire on? Is Ted going to keep the Columbia brand going, or surrender it in favor of his own?
A few things to note about today's update:
1: Is Columbia, the movie studio, also owned by Ted Turner?
2: What's the deal with Nickelodeon at this point in this timeline?
3: How did Jim Henson react to the partnership between Ted Turner and Holmes-a-Court?
4: I'd give Fawcett Publishing, or really, what's left of it, to either Walt Disney Entertainment or Universal.
(A version of) Viacom already exists at this time:
Viacom (1952–2005) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I still hope Disney still works/buys one of the other TV networks.
Is this the same as Fawcett Publications?
If this is the same as Fawcett Publications, which owns Fawcett Comics, than having Disney buying them would end Disney's deal with Marvel which could lead to Ron Perelman still buying Marvel.
Well, we've just jeopardized Watchmen's existance, and with it several future Chuck Norris "fact" memes.
I do hope Nick Crenshaw has offered the Great Khan some good alternative comic book developments to compensate...
I checked on the Internet, and apparently, the Charlton characters that inspired the Watchmen story were already purchased by DC in 1983, two years before the current date in this timeline. So, if you're a fan of that series, don't worry. I think it still exists ITTL.
I wonder what butterfly effects this timeline will have towards a certain group of Minnesotan puppeteers in a few years.
KSTC in MN might go for it if KTMA didn't.Trinity was considered and rejected as "too religious". CBS isn'tt going to change too much. Brand recognition will keep things as they are name and logo wise and for the most part he'll treat it as a pass-through. The biggest changes will be the relocation of some executive management to Atlanta and elimination of redundancies in bureaucracy and chains of command. CBS will be the "network" name and "Turner" the Cable name for the time being.
Columbia Pictures is a separate entity from Columbia Broadcasting, as is Viacom.
Nick, along with MTV, are currently owned by Warner Communications, AmEx having sold its shares per OTL. IOTL they'd sell them to Viacom in '87.
Henson went "Huh" and went about his business. Frank Wells is watching the events closely.
Yes, Fawcett Publications, but Fawcett Comics was effectively defunct in 1980 and had already liscensed its characters (including Captain Marvel/Shazam) to DC long before the POD. Charlton's characters were bought by DC in '83 as in OTL, so Watchmen can still exist.
As to Disney buying Fawcett, not in '85. Fawcett sold for over $700 million in OTL and while Ghostbusters and Back to the Future have brought in lots of cash as have the increased parking and ticket prices at the parks, they still have the roughly $500 million in debt to pay down from the takeover battle. Any purchases in the next year or so will by necessity be small as they pay down that debt.
Hadn't put much thought to MST3K yet. Joel Hodgson would be doing standup at the moment, IIRC.
That rule only covers insider trading from knowledge from their 'official position'. If Helms was tipped off by Turner, that trading would not be illegal under STOCKS Act, though you'd hope graft/bribery rules would catch it. But even then, if Helms abstained from any vote he might just sneak inside the law.No formal reprimands came of this action, in part because insider trading by US politicians wasn’t yet forbidden at the time (that rule only came about in the last decade).
I never thought I'd say this, but Pitch Black vs. Chronicles of Riddick is similar to Alien vs. Aliens (in a few, very limited ways). Completely different genres of film (horror vs action) that share characters and the same universe. Both series decided that they needed to change genre, as they had done all they could with the horror/survival genre and any repeat would face diminishing returns. If you make a bit change you will lose some fans but hopefully gain a few, Alien managed the change very well but Riddick did not.I was thinking more along the lines of Paranormal Activity vs. Paranormal Activity 2 or Pitch Black vs. Chronicles of Riddick.
Love this chapter. I am a bit sad that this takes away William Hurts oscar, but seems like the right call. Would love to see a newspaper article about the 58th Academy Awards if you think it would flow with the story.
I think I noticed a mistake though. As it is now you have written that The Bureau wins original screenplay and that The Ballad of Edward Ford also wins original screenplay. Maybe The Bureau can take adapted screenplay as a loose adaptation of 1984? Also, right now both Mask and The Bureau have won best makeup.
I mean, just on the face of it the Ballad seems like way better Oscar bait than Beauty and the Beast, basically catnip for the Oscar committee. If nothing else, it doesn't suffer from the animation ghetto issue. Throw in how it homages old Hollywood and...1: So you're telling me that The Ballad of Edward Ford earned Disney the one award that not even OTL's Beauty and the Beast could grab at the height of its popularity?
Oh, he'd love that, and be amazing at it. Honestly I think if he made a whole slew of short "deliberately terrible" B-Movie homages for the Wonderful World of Disney they'd all become cult classics for B-Movie monster fans like myself.Instead, [Burton] eagerly volunteered to create the deliberately bad B-movie effects for the Blake Film Festival screening scene in the late second act.
As someone who finds film production as interesting as the films themselves, having a whole show about the antics happening behind the camera is a fantastic idea. I think there was a Sandra Bullock or Julia Roberts romantic comedy where the 'big twist' at the end was when the director of the terrible movie production the story revolved around got bored with his own production and, noticing the on-set drama was more interesting than the film being made, secretly filmed that instead, catapulting the protagonists to instant stardom, like a modern Singing in the Rain. Anyway, I thought the idea of a movie about making a movie was a great idea, Production! sounds like a great way to vicariously scratch that itch.A new situation comedy, Production! would be co-produced with Witt/Thomas/Harris, who were just winding down the popular Benson. The show took place on the set of a long and troubled movie production for an increasingly bizarre period melodrama called “The Wind Cries Westward”.
1: So you're telling me that The Ballad of Edward Ford earned Disney the one award that not even OTL's Beauty and the Beast could grab at the height of its popularity?