I'm a communist. The problem is that any arguments about the will of individuals are meaningless if we ignore the system of coordinates in which this person is located. Our goals, views, some needs are shaped by the environment in which we live. And since people are social animals, there are also group interests. That is, the black inhabitants of Harlem have common interests and an idea of how they can be achieved, like the parishioners of the synagogue. However, this is all a second time, for it stands apart from the foundation of human existence - production. People are participants in a production relationship. Here we are faced with the loss of human nature - being a member of the black, Jewish, or German community, I have much more rights to their individuality. Entering into production relations, I automatically lose the right to be called a Man with a capital letter - with the current mode of production, people become functions. The functions of these two are Labor and Capital. PS - an interesting fact from linguistics. In my native language, Capital is He, so is the word masculine. "He" used to any words of the masculine - whether it is a particular person, animal (species designation or male of a particular species), object, or concept. In English, he is only a man or an animal that has a nickname. All nonhumans - it. As I said, our thinking is the product of the conditions in which we live. There are many examples showing that people living in the conditions of an archaic or agricultural system think somewhat differently than urban residents who received a basic education. So visiting the settlements of the peoples of the far north, the experts gave them the following statement - "In the north, all the bears are white. What color are the bears in the north?" They were told - "I was not in the north, I did not see any bears." Another experiment was shown in Central Asia — the locals were shown geometric shapes, but instead they called dishes and other household items (Let's say for them, the circumference was a bowl for preparing pilau). So we have no opportunity to talk about universal human thinking. But now we are talking about a problem of another kind. Above, I have already spoken about the fact that in production relations people become a function. The function of the capitalist is capital management. He needs to exploit the workers, produce as many goods as possible, and preferably at a high price. If he does not do this, he will lose his income, and his capital will be acquired by another bourgeois. Worker is a function of Labor. To exist it needs to work. He sells his labor in exchange for wages. However, the entire product produced is assigned by the exploiters, as a result, it enters the process of alienating its creative potential from it. These people have different tasks, and they think differently. Also note that the logic of the capitalist is not exactly the same as the formal logic. Formal logic is simply the correct construction of conclusions. However, this is still a simplification. Take for example two people who keep and serve a homeless cafeteria. They get nothing from this - their activity is based only on moral enthusiasm. Most scientists do their work without even hoping for success, but simply because of the desire to understand the world around us. The artist does not always fulfill the order, but draws simply for the love of painting. I note that these are not equivalent concepts. Jews are a specific nationality, not a manufacturing class. To the same science at least tries to achieve objectivity - there are a number of criteria that are higher than any human factors. While the set of moral and target attitudes of different people is different. It is enough just to watch a movie in a company, and you will already notice differences in the ratings of the film itself and the reaction to the behavior of the main characters.