alternatehistory.com

It is going to be no mystery for regular board readers that I'm quite fond and supportive of those 'successful Rome' TLs and scenarioes where the Roman civilization-polity survives, overcomes those flaws that led to its OTL downfall, and prevents the fragmentation of Europe in a couple-dozen, eternally-bickering nationalities. On the contrary, they do assimilate the rest of Europe and the Middle East (Scandinavia, Russia, and Persia being outside the definition of such an area for this purpose) and forge Western Eurasia in a united civilization-polity (barring occasional periods of political turmoil, dynastic crisis, regime change, and so on; such things don't count for this purpose) that endures without permanent losses to modern times, just like the Chinese civilization did in East Asia.

Despite my vast general fondness of the scenario, and some broad ideas of the divergencies and event chains necessary to accomplish it, so far I had stumbled at devising a full-fledged TL that would adequately develop it.

However, I found an apparently dead TL by other, apparently gone people that seems to have a lot of good ideas to accomplish what I sought, and I've decided to adopt it in a way. What follows is for the vast majority the intellectual accomplishment of the creators of the original TL, used without permission, which I've revised, adapted to suit my own judgement, and mixed with a few ideas of mine.

For various reasons, my version of the TL in the present form only spans almost all the first millennium CE, and is almost entirely focused on Roman events, except when other civilizations directly interact with Rome.

Nonetheless, I'm honestly convinced that even so, it would already be more than enough to send Roman West Eurasia on an irrevocable China-like development path all the way to modern times, barring extreme events.

Now, we all know there is an "Anti-Large-Empires" faction of the board that is radically hostile, in a naysaying (if not sometimes mocking) sense, to the very premise of this scenario in the first place.

I have already locked horns to exhaustion with those people on this very subject many times, and by now I accept the fact that I'm not in all evidence going to persuade them of my viewpoint in the foreseeable future (and I'd be much glad if the same courtesy would be returned to me).

Therefore, I'm open-minded to constructive suggestions and comments that uphold and develop the basic premise and main features of the scenario. I do not assume that every single detail of what I devise in a TL is necessarily optimal.

OTOH, naysaying criticism that may be boiled down to "Rome can't reform", "Rome is doomed to fall" (in a sense different from the Chinese one, of course), "Europe is destined to fragment", "Rome can't or won't conquer anything more than OTL", "OTL was a best case scenario for Rome", "political fragmentation is necessary for cultural dynamism", and "big empires are bound to be static/fail/fall" is going to be summarily ignored and scorned. As far as the OP is concerned, all such arguments were considered and ruled out for good long ago.
Top