A Glorious Union or America: the New Sparta

Chapter One Hundred and Forty Five Guess Who’s Coming to Congress
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Five

    Guess Who’s Coming to Congress

    From “Emancipation” Paul Robeson White
    Radical Press 1970


    “William Lloyd Garrison, indefatigable enemy of slavery and advocate for racial equality in America, was not an early booster of Abraham Lincoln. When Lincoln ran for president, Garrison saw him, at best, as a politician with compromised antislavery credentials and, at worst, a common bigot full of "white-man-isms" in his speeches. After emancipation however Garrison's opinion of Lincoln improved significantly. He met with Lincoln early in 1864 and said afterwards he believed Lincoln would work to "uproot slavery, and give fair-play to the emancipated." Within a year Lincoln’s name would once again be mud with Garrison and all over one issue – colonization…”

    70788-004-AF1586F1.jpg

    William Lloyd Garrison

    From "Lincoln - A Reassessment" by Dr. Lee M. King
    Carlotta 1959


    "Nearly all of Lincoln's early biographers saw in him an untainted goodwill towards the negro, and assumed that Lincoln's emancipation policies were indistinguishable from his overall sympathy for their plight and his foresight concerning race relations in the United States. They ignored or were ignorant of his comments about the negro race in general and their assessment cannot be reconciled with his views on colonization…

    Lincoln’s views on the negro race were apparent for any who wished to look. If one takes those defining debates between Douglas and Lincoln in 1858 we can hear Lincoln in his own words set out his position on race...

    "I am not, nor have I ever been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races";

    There is a physical difference [between blacks and whites] that will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality”;

    "There must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.

    His views were not lost on his contemporaries. Indeed those abolitionists who knew him were not afraid to express their opinion "If there was any shadow of a hope that a man of a more decidedly anti-slavery conviction and policy could be elected, I was not for Mr. Lincoln" (Frederick Douglass)…

    We should not forget that Lincoln's political hero was Henry Clay, the eminent American statesman. A slave owner himself, Clay was prominent in the campaign to resettle free blacks outside of the United States, and served as president of the American Colonization Society. In a speech given by Lincoln in 1858 he voiced his uncritical admiration for Clay. Lincoln described Clay as "my beau ideal of a statesman, the man for whom I fought all of my humble life." Indeed Lincoln's comments on Clay are very instructive. If we go back further to the eulogy for Clay that Lincoln delivered in 1852 in Springfield we hear Lincoln’s approval of the concept of colonization for, after praising Clay's lifelong devotion to the cause of black resettlement, Lincoln went on to say "There is a moral fitness in the idea of returning to Africa her children...If as the friends of colonization hope, the present and coming generations of our countrymen shall by any means succeed in freeing our land from the dangerous presence of slavery, and, at the same time, in restoring a captive people to their long-lost fatherland, with bright prospects for the future, and this too, so gradually, that neither races nor individuals shall have suffered by the change, it will indeed be a glorious consummation.”…

    From “Lincoln’s Journey – The Evolution of a President’s Thinking on Race” from an article by Dr Murray Helm
    North & South Magazine 2009


    “Other historians outside the United States have taken a much harder line on Lincoln since the mid-1900s. They point out his life long opposition to inter-racial marriage and even to initial opposition to blacks serving as jurors. Historian Fernando McKendry of Carlotta University has called him a ‘recovering racist’…

    There can be no denying Lincoln told racist jokes; he enjoyed black minstrel shows; and he had little time for the hardened abolitionists and their almost religious conviction that the races were equal under God. However the criticism that has most often been deployed to damn Lincoln is his support for ‘black colonization’. There is no question that Lincoln backed unsuccessful schemes to send willing freed slaves to new lives in countries such as Haiti, Panama, British Honduras and finally and most significantly in Africa…

    These schemes primarily arose during two pivotal periods for race relations: the Emancipation Proclamation during his first term and at the time of the mid-term elections during his second term which returned the first African-Americans in large numbers to Congress...

    In these arguments it is always a question of Lincoln, the saint, or Lincoln ,the sinner. What is not often considered is Lincoln the politician…"

    T028309A.jpg

    South Carolina in 1866 elected the first Congressional Delegation to have a Black majority

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    "At the time of the Emancipation Proclamation the question was often asked of Lincoln, what would become of the negro in a post-slavery United States. One of the solutions offered at this time by Lincoln was the old idea of colonization, a plan in which blacks would be asked to leave the United States. Many abolitionists saw this as evidence of Lincoln's refusal to countenance full equality for blacks in the post-war settlement. That was certainly an accusation Salmon Chase made on several occasions when trying to garner support to replace Lincoln on the Republican ticket…

    The issue arose a second time during 1865 when Lincoln held several meetings with leading African-Americans, abolitionists, and missionaries with the avowed intention of exploring the mass migration of freedmen and women to Africa. These soundings outraged men like Garrison and Douglass and dramatically set back Lincoln's reputation among radicals and abolitionists alike...

    One explanation offered sees Lincoln for the masterful politician he was. In an 1865 letter to Isaac Stevens, John J. Peck, then head of the Freedmen’s Bureau, suggests Lincoln’s support of colonization was, in large part, pure political strategy. Just as Lincoln’s suggestion of colonization in 1862/63 had sought to ease conservative Northern fears of the consequences of emancipation, so the colonization discussions in 1865 were designed to alleviate conservative Republican and War Democrat concerns about the imminent elections in the southern states. Proscription had left several of these states with a black majority and voluntary immigration amongst unreconciled white southerners (both internally between states and externally to Mexico, Brazil etc) was further enhancing the imbalance. It was clear to even the most ill informed observer that the 1866 midterm elections, which would see a full slate of representatives elected from each of the southern states, would return many black legislators to Congress. The very idea set most conservative Northerners on edge…

    They were a large and significant portion of the Northern population, though they are often ignored because they were not as loud or colorful as the radicals (and indeed are ignored for being on the ‘wrong side of history’). Yet they were an important counterweight to the radicals in Congress and their support on several issues was vital to Lincoln’s ability to shape legislation. Lincoln’s ability to play conservative against radical was key to maintaining a degree of control over Reconstruction…

    Presumably those who feared that the freed slaves would flock to the North were pacified by a proposal to resettle blacks elsewhere. It is no coincidence that both before issuing the Emancipation Proclamation and the 1866 midterms, Lincoln "made a great fuss about colonization—a ritual he must enact every time he contemplates some new move for the benefit of the negro."(Peck)

    For Lincoln, the idea of colonization served a purpose; it helped to allay his own uncertainties, but more importantly the fears of a vast section of northern whites. After the 1866 midterms however, when it was clear that the blacks in Congress could and would make common cause with the conservatives just as often as they would with radicals, Lincoln could abandon the concept entirely...

    Frederick Douglass acknowledged many years later that, while from the standpoint of the abolitionists “Lincoln seemed tardy, cold, dull, and indifferent” he was considerably ahead of the general northern populace on the slavery question. “Measure him by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, [and Lincoln] was swift, zealous, radical, and determined.”. If Peck is right then Lincoln becomes a master of political misdirection; of appearing to appease conservatives while manipulating them toward acceptance of radical policies. Douglass and many other contemporaries failed to appreciate or even to understand Lincoln’s political legerdemain. Many revisionist historians of the 1940s,50s and 60s have similarly failed...”

    Alexander_Crummell.jpg

    Reverend Alexander Crummell

    From “The King and his Heir – Lincoln and Kearny in the Civil War” by Robert Todd Lincoln II
    Grafton Press 1939


    "On May 18 the President, ignoring the majority opinion in the cabinet, invited a delegation of freedmen to the White House. There he urged them to consider emigration to Africa. Frederick Douglass was outraged by Lincoln’s proposal. He publicly rebuked the President for his “pride of race and blood, his contempt for Negroes and his canting hypocrisy”...

    Taken aback by the opposition to African emigration Lincoln questioned the opposition. Oliver O. Howard responded that "the freedman knows as little of Africa as he does of Thucydides"...

    Howard facilitated the introduction of Reverend Alexander Crummell to President Lincoln as an expert on Africa. Crummell was born free in New York. His grandfather however had been of the Temne people of Sierra Leone, borne into slavery at 13. Crummell was an ardent 'Pan-African' firmly believing that the emigration of American blacks to Africa would uplift both American and African alike. He had returned to America in 1865, from a religious mission in Liberia, to seek funds for further missions to Africa. He believed that only by educating America's freedmen about Africa could they be induced to move there...

    The introduction to Lincoln opened doors for Crummell and with the support of Howard, and an inconsistent mix of conservative republicans and religious abolitionists, he founded the African-American Missionary Society. The AAMS would, by the end of the year, launch new missions to Sierra Leone, the Gold Coast, Liberia and most quixotically smaller missions to both East Africa (with a view to opposing Arab slavers there) and Abyssinia, after Liberia, the only independent Christian country in Africa..."

    From “Lincoln’s Journey – The Evolution of a President’s Thinking on Race” from an article by Dr Murray Helm
    North & South Magazine 2009


    "As we continue to study Lincoln we continue to define ourselves. Most historians have discarded the myth of the saintly Great Emancipator, but they have also rejected the counter myth of Lincoln as a hopeless racist. Perhaps we should settle for Lincoln, the master political strategist?"

    freedom_lincoln_large.jpg
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Six The Kearny Mission - The American Crown Prince Part I
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Six

    The Kearny Mission - The American Crown Prince

    Part I

    From “Kearny the Magnificent” by Roger Galton
    NorthWestern 2005


    "The importance of the Kearny mission cannot be overstated. It would have a profound effect on US-European relations for a generation, but it would also lay the foundation of a new direction in American domestic politics. With two future presidents and four future cabinet officers, the Mission would put a face on future American administrations with which leading Europeans would be familiar for the next 30 years..."

    From "Profoundly Wrong - A Re-assessment of the American Historical Criticism" by Bertram James
    Collingwood-German 1933


    "Analysis of history in the United States is, by dint of its founding philosophy, prejudiced in favour of the discredited Great Man theory of history. This natural prejudice tends to overstate the contributions of men like Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln etc to the tide of American history. It fails to capture the inevitability of the great cultural, political and economic tides of history against which no one man can stand. The beliefs, aspirations and actions of the masses matter more than the words or deeds of one man...

    Nowhere is the American obsession with the Great Man more exaggerated than in its assessment of Philip Kearny, the so-called Imperial President; and no event in his life is imbued with more undeserved significance that the so called 'Kearny Mission'..."

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    "What Agnes had envisaged as a quiet, restful European tour had quickly snowballed into a major, if very unofficial, diplomatic mission, If not quite a cast of hundreds, the final roster of travelers was nonetheless rather large for a private holiday party. It was more in keeping with the entourage of, what the French called, an 'American Prince'...

    Phil Kearny only agreed to the tour, despite the Presidential command to take leave, on the basis he would still receive reports. Kearny also intended to be fully active in the anticipated Congressional wrangling over the future size and composition of the army. As a result he insisted on being accompanied by his, albeit reduced, staff: Colonel Chauncey McKeever, Major Louis Fitzgerald, Major James C. Briscoe and Lieutenant Robert Todd Lincoln. Kearny also invited his closest adviser on the future state of the army: his cousin John Watts de Peyster. The New York Militia Brigadier General would be accompanied by his wife, Estelle and their two sons: Colonel Frederic De Peyster and Captain Johnston de Peyster. Frederic, as a military doctor, had the unofficial responsibility of monitoring both General Kearny's and his own father's health: neither of which was particularly robust at the outset. In a touching moment before the party left New York, General Kearny had the honor of personally presenting Johnston de Peyster with a Kearny Cross for his courage in his very first engagement at Charlotte...

    John and Estelle's stormy relationship would cause both John and Phil Kearny difficulties later...

    Agnes had asked family friends Isaac and Margaret Stevens to join the party as Margaret had been a rare friend to Agnes before she received the President's seal of approval, and Major General (USV) Isaac Stevens was a trusted member of Phil Kearny's military family. Their son, Hazard Stevens, was, as a favor, temporarily assigned to Kearny's staff so as to join his parents...

    upload_2017-9-20_19-36-28.jpeg
    220px-General_R%C3%A9gis_de_Trobriand.jpg
    220px-JPHale.jpg

    Isaac Stevens, Regis de Trobriand and John P. Hale

    At this point the administration took notice of the party and began to encourage the addition of their own tourists...

    Seward was deeply concerned about the Kearny plans to return to Paris. Phil Kearny's Francophilia was no secret in the cabinet and Seward was one of the few he knew of Kearny's 'impolitic' views about the French intervention in Mexico. Seward therefore felt it necessary to balance the party out with someone that Kearny trusted but who could be relied upon not to be swept up in the French Imperial tide of diplomacy that would be directed at Kearny. Major General Regis de Trobriand was such a man. His sympathies were firmly with a republic for France, but he was diplomatic enough to communicate that without offering insult. His wife, Mary, would join him. They had not returned to Paris since their wedding in 1843...

    Lincoln was initially satisfied with the counsel that Isaac Stevens would offer Kearny. However following an interview with Stevens Lincoln became concerned when he realized the full scope of Stevens loyalty and commitment to 'the old man'. John P. Hale had been seeking a diplomatic posting abroad. As a loyal and reliable Republican of no particular faction Lincoln turned to him as the political ballast of the Kearny party. Whether such an addition was sought by Robert Todd Lincoln or not can only be surmised. However Lincoln sold the addition to Kearny as an "opportunity for his son and Lucy Hale to experience Europe under the watchful eye of trusted and responsible friends"...

    Gideon Welles would join the collective effort to over-engineer the party. Assuming now the widely held belief that this holiday party destined for a grand tour of Europe was naught but an ill disguised diplomatic and military delegation, he insisted that the Navy be represented. It was a request easily granted for another cousin of Phil Kearny's, albeit a more distance one, was the retired bachelor Rear Admiral Lawrence Kearny. An old man now, Lawrence Kearny had in his prime fought slavers in the West Indies, Greek pirates in the Mediterranean, and had out witted Jean Lafitte. The Kearnys and de Peysters referred to him as Uncle Lawrence...

    In order to bring a modern perspective to the aged Lawrence, the temporarily re-instated Admiral was assigned the best and brightest from the Naval Academy, Lieutenant Alfred Thayer Mahan, second in his class. The seemingly bookish Mahan would struggle to fit in with the somewhat more "piratical members of General Kearny's staff"...


    220px-Commodore_Lawrence_Kearny.jpg

    Lawrence Kearny

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    "It was certainly to the regret of George Cornewall Lewis that the Kearny party was not met in England with the pomp and circumstance it was to see on the continent. The Foreign Secretary, Lord John Russell, was firmly of the view that the party, having no formal accreditation from the United States government, did not merit any particular official notice from the British Government. Furthermore while it would have been usual for such an august foreign dignitary as Philip Kearny to be presented to the Queen, the Queen was in one of the more truculent phases of her mourning and was not receiving unofficial guests...

    This was a time of transition as Lord Palmerston's time in office drew to a close. Having experienced several recent defeats, particularly in an area of former strength - foreign policy, there were murmurings about succession. Gladstone had clashed with Pam on foreign affairs, church appointments, electoral reform and the military. Gladstone, in his role as Chancellor, and Lewis, as Secretary of War, too had clashed on foreign affairs and military reform. It was increasingly apparent that Lord Palmerston favored Lewis over Gladstone and was reluctant to relinquish the reins of government and party leadership without confirmation that Lewis or at worst Russell, and not Gladstone, would succeed him. "Gladstone must be stopped. He will wreck the party and end up in a madhouse" (Lord Palmerston in private correspondence)...

    Unofficial the Kearny party may have been but it did not stop General Kearny being lionized in London society for two weeks. Finally, before a week long rest in Brighton and the surrounding countryside, Lord Palmerston invited Generals Kearny, de Peyster, Stevens and their wives and Senator Hale to a lavish dinner at his London home. Hale ensured the party was well advised to stay away from the Irish Question, on which Lord Palmerston was notoriously sensitive. The difficult subject of compensation for the CSS Alabama damages did arise, at the instigation of General Stevens, and threatened to derail an otherwise pleasant evening. Not because of British-American disagreements, but because the cabinet itself was split between Lord Palmerston, who opposed compensation in any form, and a rare act of concert between Gladstone and Lewis, who agreed financial compensation should be paid and at worst an arbitration of some kind should be set up...

    Another potentially discordant note was struck by Gladstone when he rose to toast "The Anglo-Saxon race in the late difficulties: On both sides they have shown courage and endurance highly honourable to their stock". However Phil Kearny was the first to rise to accept the toast and the moment passed...

    While the party moved on to Brighton, Admiral Kearny and Lieutenant Mahan accepted a separate invitation from Admiral Sydney Dacres, Commander of the Channel Fleet, to inspect the fleet at anchor and also to examine some of the ironclads then being laid down. While Admiral Kearny was a product of his age and thus a skeptic where steam and iron where concerned, the visit had a profound effect on Lieutenant Mahan's views of the future of naval power..."

    "As the party arrived by train into Paris was met by a honor guard from the Imperial Guard Cavalry under General Louis Michel Morris, General Kearny's old friend and commander from the Italian campaign. It was the first indication that the French Imperial Government had every intention of treating the Kearny party as an official foreign delegation of the highest order...

    The Earl Cowley, British Ambassador to France and nephew of the Duke of Wellington, described Kearny's reception in Paris "as equal parts that due a Crown Prince of Europe and that due a conquering French hero"...

    The party discovered that their accommodation in Paris had effectively been cancelled by the Imperial government and instead the party were to be guests of the Imperial Court itself...

    It was in Paris that the party received its final additions. General George Armstrong Custer, beau sabreur and the man who had slain the assassin Booth, was himself in Paris on tour with his wife Libby. In fact Custer's intention was to put himself firmly in General Kearny's path in Paris with a view joining the party. Custer feared the threatened reduction in the US army would leave him without a command commensurate to his own sense of self-importance. Custer hoped either to gain preference from General Kearny (as he had done as a Lieutenant on Kearny's staff at the outset of McClellan's Peninsula Campaign) or perhaps gainful employment in European service, as Kearny himself had done, at an appropriate rank...

    For a party of private citizens, the formal presentation to the Emperor and Empress at Versailles was an astonishingly formal affair. Generals Kearny, Stevens, de Trobriand, de Peyster and Custer all appeared in full dress uniform, hardly the attire of a private American citizen abroad. Custer wore enough gold braid to satisfy even the most flamboyant French Admiral, while General Kearny's uniform was notable for the single medal on the breast - the Légion d'Honneur...

    attachment.php

    The Ball at Versailles thrown for General and Mrs Kearny to celebrate victory for the Union and Peace in the United States

    The Emperor was profoundly impressed by this, his second meeting with Philip Kearny. In the words of General Morris here was a man with "the genius of Napoleon, the flamboyance of Murat, and the courage of Marshal Ney..." The Emperor paid him the compliment of calling him the "greatest Frenchman in uniform" in honor of Kearny's service in Italy and North Africa...

    There were a number of French generals, Morris among them, who considered Kearny something of a sage on the subject of the art of war. No command had been comparable in size to Kearny's, either in terms of troops commanded or the scope of the theatre of war, since that of Napoleon I had marched on Russia. French memoirs and reminiscences of the period are replete with the words and maxims allegedly dispensed by General Kearny during his time in Paris. Were all attributable to Kearny he must not have stopped speaking to eat or sleep or indeed breath for three weeks...

    In a letter from Morris to General Louis-Jules Trochu, Morris quotes Kearny on the development of his own understanding of war: "he once believed that victory required only courage and discipline. Command of armies has taught him differently. These qualities are but the sword point of victory. The blade that drives the point home is made of railroads and factories; telegraph wires and steam engines. The Rebels learned that courage alone cannot drive the blade of victory home". Morris believed most firmly that Kearny was referring to the French army he had seen in Italy: courageous but lacking the organization, resources or industry to defeat all but the most disorganized foe..."

    406709-1376401238.jpg

    General Louis-Michel Morris
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Six The Kearny Mission - The American Crown Prince Part II
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Six

    The Kearny Mission - The American Crown Prince

    Part II

    From "The Mexican Adventure through American Eyes" by David Hofstedder
    LUS 1996


    “The unspoken obsession of the Imperial Court was the campaign in Mexico and American attitudes toward it. Publicly Secretary of State Seward continued to invoke the Monroe Doctrine and threaten dire consequences. In private President Lincoln had quietly vetoed any immediate military involvement in Mexico. The radicals in Congress, fearing the administration would be “distracted from the subjugation of the slaveholding South and true emancipation of the slave” (Benjamin Wade), had made their opposition to an American adventure south of the Rio Grande clear. All this however was unknown in the French Court…

    None the less Napoleon tasked his Court with obtaining the views of the Kearny party on the intervention in Mexico. Of the party only Senator Hale succeeded in maintaining the official position of the US government, at least if French records are to be believed. Invoking the Monroe Doctrine Hale indicated the French presence in Mexico would not long be tolerated once America had resolved her present difficulties. General Stevens on the other hand caught French officers off-guard by suggesting America would not have to interfere in Mexico as the French would soon evacuate Mexico on their own. Stevens firmly believed Mexico was a political and military quagmire in which no victory could long be maintained. That being so he believed the French were themselves beginning to realize the trouble they had volunteered for in invading the country…

    Philip Kearny’s view that Mexico would benefit from a constitutional monarchy in the European model were hinted at in French government papers. Kearny was more forthcoming about his views on Mexican culture, literacy, religion, superstitions etc. All of which led the French Court to conclude that Kearny was sympathetic, if not to the French intervention itself, then at least to the attempt to establish a European-style Constitutional Monarchy in Mexico…

    Kearny’s views were maintained and supported by John Watts de Peyster. De Peyster’s later writings from his time in office would indicate that he believed a French presence in Mexico would be beneficial to the United States. He held the belief that the existential threat of a Habsburg Empire in Mexico would be enough to justify an enlarged United States military long beyond the Reconstruction of the southern states (in a way that British North America could never be). “Just as the threat of French Canada served to unite Britain and her American colonies, so too would the threat of a stable catholic Mexican Monarchy provide the mortar uniting our diverse continental regions”…”

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    “The journey through Spain was less eventful. The party stayed in Madrid briefly before moving on to Barcelona. Again General Kearny was accorded full military and civic honors. He has met by the alcalde (the mayor) of Madrid and a military parade was hastily arranged. However relations between the United States and Spain remained poor. Although the US government was happy for exiled rebels to reside in Spanish Cuba, there was still a lingering resentment of the Spanish tolerance of rebel activity within its borders during the war…

    When Kearny was invited for an audience with the Queen he declined due to a relapse of his illness. Some suspected that Senator Hale had encouraged a political illness in Kearny. Then again given Kearny’s constant activity during his weeks in France it can be believed that his barely recovered health may well have collapsed again…

    …they travelled by sea to Genoa and thence to Turin. Although allowed to rest in Turin in peace for several days, the parties’ arrival in the temporary seat of government, Florence, saw a repeat of their treatment in Paris. General Kearny was feted as a hero of the Risorgimento. Giuseppe Garibaldi was present in Florence at that time. With a band of his veterans he met Kearny’s carriage. The former redshirts detached the horses and proceed to drag the carriage through the streets of Florence to much cheering and celebration. At the temporary parliament building Kearny was met by the Prime Minister, General Alfonso Ferrero, Cavaliere La Màrmora…”

    200px-Alfonso_La_Marmora.jpg

    Prime Minister, General Alfonso Ferrero, Cavaliere La Màrmora

    From “Kearny the Magnificent” by Roger Galton
    NorthWestern 2005


    “How much these two men would have in common: a war hero who had risen to the highest political office in his nation and another on the same trajectory. During the six days Kearny spent in Florence he twice went riding for several hours with Marmora. Chauncey McKeever, who accompanied them on both occasions, confirmed their conversation was wide ranging: taking in military tactics and the latest innovations; memories of Solferino; foreign affairs and particularly the impending French evacuation of Rome. Of the impending alliance with Prussia though there appears no mention…

    It was during this time that King Victor Emmanuel sought to honor Kearny for his involvement in the war against Austria. The King made it known he would induct Philip Kearny into the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus as a Cavaliere. Kearny initially sought to refuse the award as he felt that the Commanding General of the United States Army should not accept foreign awards or titles, as it was “against the spirit of the Constitution to accept” (McKeever recording Kearny’s views) even if it was not technically prohibited. Victor Emmanuel had a persuasive counter-argument “General Kearny my friend, one does not refuse a King…

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    “Passing briefly through Venice which Regis de Trobriand and his wife knew well from their many years in residence, the party passed northwards into the Alps on the way to Vienna…

    Although General Kearny was treated with courtesy and an old world chivalry that welcomed a brave former foe, it was not considered politic that Kearny or the members of his party be presented to the Emperor. Nonetheless Kearny was presented to Archduke Rainer Ferdinand, Minister President of Austria, and Foreign Minister Count Alexander von Mensdorff-Pouilly, Prince Dietrichstein von Nicholsburg…

    The Americans were on safer ground in Vienna. Austria had taken little active part in the diplomatic attempts to intervene in the American War. A few Austrian rifles had found their way through third parties into the hands of both armies, to largely poor reviews. The Austrian army and government were still struggling to cope with the consequences of defeat in the Second Italian War, and those of victory in the Second Schleswig War. Tensions with Italy over Venetia continued unabated and now Prussian seemed intent on provoking Austria…

    From all I have seen and heard the Austrian army is now in a worse condition than that which I faced in Lombardy seven years ago…” concluded Kearny in a letter to John F. Reynolds. John Watts de Peyster, always with an eye to learning lessons for the American military, asked more searching questions: “Huge numbers of conscripts remain on permanent leave from the army making the purpose of conscription, the training of a pool of reserves, unserved…Much is talked about the latest rifled artillery of which much is expected. However my enquiries have yet to find whether any pieces have actually been purchased for the army…the quality of the officers we have met is entirely mixed. Gallant young men of high birth they may be but I am not as yet impressed that there is much knowledge in their military duty. I would set the knowledge and experience of these young scoundrels of our staff against any Austrian officer, even those who have professed to have fought in Lombardy or the Danish Duchies…

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    “Munich was much enjoyed by the ladies of the party. The Swan King, Ludwig II, matched the offer of Napoleon and ensured the honored party resided in the finest accommodation the Crown could arrange. Again another huge ball was thrown in General Kearny’s honor and for once Agnes did not complain. The young King had charmed Agnes at their presentation…

    220px-Ludwig_II_of_Bavaria.jpg

    King Ludwig II of Bavaria

    To what extent Ludwig’s professions of friendship were a result of his genuine admiration and respect for Kearny and the United States is not clear. Certainly the Minister-President of Bavaria, Baron Karl Ludwig von der Pfordten, had an ulterior motive…

    The Minister-President has again opportuned me on the subject of a federation of German States. He is most interested in the balance of Federal versus state power in our system…He seemed most surprised by the suggestion that the rebellion of the Southern States was in part a rejection of that mode of balance mandated by our Constitution…His object is clearly to unite the minor German states in a union of some type with the express purpose of excluding Prussia and Austria from mastery of German affairs…One must remember he has been a minister in the Saxon government before his return to Bavaria… He has, despite his optimism little support in the various Kingdoms, Grand Duchies, Duchies and Principalities. Yet I feel there is a natural undercurrent tending to a national feeling and toward a union of the Germans into one great nation, ruled by one common head as a national unit…” (John P. Hale to Secretary Seward)…”

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    “Prussia was a veritable undiscovered country to the Kearny party. Britain, France, and Italy – all these were well known to members of the party. Even Spain did not seem so alien to men who had fought in Mexico. No it was their Prussian sojourn that was an adventure into the unknown…

    The generals were familiar with ‘48ers who had stood foursquare with Lincoln and the Union. Many had fought in the Germanies but none on the Prussian side. The nearest to a Prussian veteran Kearny had served with was General von Steinwehr, veteran of the Brunswickian army which took its lead from its larger Prussian neighbor…

    Prussia seemed to be a country on the move. After the glories of Frederick the Great, the Prussian light dimmed during the Napoleonic Wars where its defeats were its own and its victories shared. Now Prussia was ascending again with victory over Denmark and a policy independent and increasingly hostile to its rival in the Germanies, Austria. Many saw this revival of fortunes as the work of one man, Count Otto von Bismarck…

    The impending visit by Phil Kearny had been anticipated in Berlin for several weeks. Furthermore it was strongly rumored that, upon the party’s return to France, the Emperor intended to honor Kearny with a huge military parade on the Champ de Mars. Not to be outdone King Wilhelm intended to stage a series of military exercises – Kriegsspiele – to which Kearny and his fellow generals would be invited. In this he had the support of Albrecht Graf von Roon, the War Minister, and his own War Cabinet. Only the Minister President, Bismarck, voiced a word of caution “You do not show a potential opponent how you intend to play the game except perhaps to convince him not to play against you at all”. However Bismarck did not labor his opposition and ultimately demurred “Let the Americans see then. We shall not find Prussia playing them in a hundred years”. He was to change his tune after he had met General Philip Kearny…”

    From “Kearny the Magnificent” by Roger Galton
    NorthWestern 2005


    “An unseasonal cold snap and an unfortunate overnight stay in a sickly Dresden had left several members of the party in a delicate condition. Nonetheless after two days’ rest in Berlin, Phil Kearny, de Trobriand, Stevens, de Peyster, McKeever, Fitzgerald and the US Counsel to Berlin, Norman P Judd, set out to observe the Prussian exercises over the next three days. Kearny and de Peyster were reduced to riding in a coach but this still afforded them a good view of most of the exercises…

    Unable to ride Kearny spent longer than he otherwise might in the relative comfort of the command headquarters of Corps Black, the formation under the command of Lieutenant General Edwin Freiherr von Manteuffel. It was during the second day that Kearny first met Otto von Bismarck…”

    From “The Reluctant Professional – The Life and Letters of Chauncey McKeever” edited by Roger Galbraith
    NorthWestern 2012


    *Editors note: The text switches from McKeever quoting and commenting on Kearny to the editor Dr. Galbraith quoting and commenting on McKeever

    The conversation was candid, at least on our side. Von Roon and the Prussian Generals of Schwarze Korps had exhausted General Kearny the day before with their questions about our late war…At first they seemed dismissive, but as the General spoke they became transfixed”. The General played the dashing cavalier who had suffered his Damascene conversion to a different form of war on the bloody fields of Virginia, Pennsylvania and Maryland…

    War” he said “would be unrecognizable in 50 years from that fought 50 years earlier”. “With each passing campaign, war became less about courage, glory and honor and more about the industrial sinews of the nations who strove in it.” I heard General Kearny say to Manteuffel that he feared “men's lives were becoming the fuel of war…Its outcome decided by which nation could afford to keep the fires burning the brightest or longest”. The General seemed young and dashing in France and even indeed in Italy. We could all see the fine young officer of cavalry he had been. In Prussia he was a commander of great hosts. An old man certainly, but one wise in the vicissitudes of war. Von Molkte, who was acting as an umpire for the games, confided that he thought our General had developed “a very Prussian understanding of war”…

    attachment.php

    L to R: On horseback - Chauncey McKeever, Isaac Stevens and Regis de Trobriand. In the carriage - John Watts de Peyster, Philip Kearny, Louis Fitzgerald (in his New York Fire Zouaves dress uniform) and Norman P Judd (US Consul in Berlin) . On foot - Otto von Bismarck

    Bismarck though, he wished to know about the future on that second day. He fished for the General’s views on British North America and the French intervention in Mexico. Senator Hale tried to deliver the administration answer, but the General’s discomfort had made him impatient with that hypocrisy. “I wish the French and Maximilian well in Mexico. The Mexicans have had no success in giving themselves stability and good government, and my nation refuses to. It is right that we should let someone else try”. McKeever then sets out the bones of a conversation which has been reproduced in print and film many times…

    Bismarck: “Surely General the President’s government would never tolerate another European power on its border, an empire, in breach of your much vaunted Monroe Doctrine? Your Secretary Seward repeats it so to every European he meets that I wonder he knows any other words”.

    Kearny: “Why not sir? Our United States have nothing to fear from a stable Mexico or for that matter our friends in France. France, sir, is America’s first ally. Before we were a nation French blood, French arms and French specie sealed our friendship. We Americans will never forget the debt we owe the French people. Would that it were one we could repay in my lifetime.”

    Bismarck: “Indeed General. America has very wisely eschewed our European troubles. An admirable pacific policy

    Kearny: “Ha! Does any of us know what the future holds for our country? A change of policy is never but a pen stroke away?

    From “Kearny the Magnificent” by Roger Galton
    NorthWestern 2005


    "Von Roon recorded a conversation with Bismarck on Kearny. Whether accurate or written with hindsight it is provoking in any event. Von Roon claims to have noted to Bismarck that the United States would be lucky to have such a man of destiny as Kearny as its President. If the recorded response is accurate it is perhaps the best example of Bismarck’s perspicacity: Philip Kearny was to his mind "the most dangerous man of influence I have yet met".

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    “Agnes dug in her heels after Berlin. Both Philip and John de Peyster had been taken ill twice since landing in Europe. Old Uncle Lawrence too was visibly exhausted. He continued to labor under a cold caught in Dresden which got slowly worse. The invitations of Kings and Dukes were now as nothing to her demands – the party would have a real rest. The spa resort at Baden-Baden was their destination until Agnes was satisfied that all the party’s 'croakers' were rested. Taking the waters and walks in the Lichtentaler Allee were to be the height of excitement…

    After Brussels the party returned to Paris. It was well Agnes had insisted on rest before the final leg of their tour for they return to Paris to a whirlwind of events. The Emperor had arranged a grand parade in honor of his American guests. In return Kearny had arranged himself to host a ball. Not in Paris but at Saumur. The jaded members of the Imperial Court perhaps thought it an odd choice and expected a modest affair. After all it was a private not a state affair. Yet officers of the army and the cavalry in particular vied for invitations. Those who had been at Saumur in 1840 recalled the ball Lieutenant Kearny had thrown in the Grand Hall of the Cavalry School. An unlimited budget had been placed at the disposal of the organizing committee; the supper was sent from Paris by one of that city’s most celebrated restaurateurs; every gentleman had received a morocco leather and silver cigar case and every lady a bouquet of flowers in an elegant silver holder.

    attachment.php

    Ecole de cavalerie de Saumur

    The ball in 1865 was, if possible on a grander scale. Important military and civil dignitaries crowded the hall. Ambassadors, princes, envoys, generals, businessmen and guests from a dozen countries were present. “I believe the General has invited everyone he has met on our travels in Europe” (McKeever). The first affair at Saumar had been heralded as the greatest in France between the Empires. The second affair was considered its superior in every respect. The ball confirmed Kearny as the foremost lion of French if not indeed all European society. Only de Peyster was unimpressed. “Another ball such as this and I will be the rich cousin…

    The magnificent parade on the Champ de Mars was an unparallel sight: a magnificent array of uniforms of every hue; horseflesh of unequalled quality; martial music of the most stirring kind…

    General Morris thought General Kearny seemed somber given the magnificent spectacle and sought to know the reason. “My friend the French army makes a magnificent spectacle. That is the army of Marengo and Austerlitz, of the Malakoff and Solferino: Victories past. From what I have seen and heard here in France and learned myself in service, unless this army is reformed that I fear is where its victories remain – the past.” McKeever records a different conversation between Kearny and de Trobriand “Our army must have something of the French vitality in battle: a thing that comes naturally to our volunteer soldier, but what we need more is something of that Prussian organization we saw at Bernau. A thing which does not come naturally to our American idea of war…

    711ebe2cc346.jpg

    The Grand Review on the Champ de Mars​

    From “The Mission” by Evangeline Lawrence
    Brogan Mills 1988


    “For six months Philip Kearny and a half-dozen American generals and politicians had toured the capitols of Europe. They had made an impact well beyond their numbers. The American Civil War was now not some story on a page. The names now had faces. The heroes now had form. Who knows how the war might have been perceived without the Kearny mission…

    In any event the name Philip Kearny was linked with the presidency of the United States in every court in Europe long before it reached such a status in the councils of America’s politicians…
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Seven Brotherhood, Trauma and a Great Purpose - The Army and its Veterans
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Seven

    Brotherhood, Trauma and a Great Purpose - The Army and its Veterans

    From "The Reconstruction Era" by Michael Baylor
    Grosvenor 2006


    "The might of the United States army in the summer of 1865 was ephemeral. The volunteers wanted to go home. Demobilization, however, was spread over a period of two years because of the needs of the occupation of the Southern states and the instability in Mexico. This all despite the fact that demobilization could have occurred in three months...

    The Radicals in Congress were pushing to ensure the enforcement of expatriation and proscription was not diluted for want of manpower. For the next two years the Radicals insistence on many volunteers being kept with the colors would begin to sour opinions among many northern voters..."

    From "Kearny's Army - The United States Army from the Civil War to the Emperors' War"
    MacArthur University 2007


    "On January 1, 1865 there were 1,187,354 volunteers in the Army. Within two years, the General in Chief, knew that strength would be gone. To replace it General Kearny wanted to increase the regular army to 100,000 men. Neither the President nor Secretary of War Stanton would agree to back a fivefold expansion of the regulars. The Radicals however had the whiphand. They wanted a large enough army to keep the South in its place. Congress voted an establishment of 80,512 officers and enlisted men. This meant that the regular army would, on paper at least, expand to 44 regiments of infantry and 20 regiments of cavalry (later reduced in 1868 to 15)...

    indian-scouts-1882.jpg

    The 13th Cavalry - invariably the "Scouts"

    A significant effect of the Civil War on the new organisation of the Army was a provision in the 1865 Act for 5 African American infantry regiments, 3 African American cavalry regiments (10th, 11th and 15th), and 1 Native American cavalry regiment (13th). Furthermore, while those regiments already on strength would remain white in character, the remaining new regiments to be raised were to be mixed (albeit with a mono-racial company structure and white officers only). This was acknowledged, even by the Radicals, as an 'experimental' provision. It had worked well during the war. The question for the army was whether it would work in peacetime. Within the army the provision had its advocates: Isaac Rodman, John J. Peck and Oliver O. Howard for example. It was not without its detractors, and Winfield Scott Hancock was foremost among them. To him it had been an "exceptional wartime measure" that would have a "deleterious effect on morale in peacetime"..."

    images

    Hancock the Superb had grave misgivings about the mixed regiments

    From "The Reconstruction Era" by Michael Baylor
    Grosvenor 2006


    "The war had settled once and for all time the questions of slavery and of state sovereignty. However after the peace the problems of reconstruction remained and with them the Army's involvement in southern affairs. Of course the army had the primary responsibility for overseeing reconstruction. As the Union armies had advanced, civil government in the South had collapsed. This was particularly acute after the murder of General Hunter which had raised fears of tit for tat killings and so civil officials fled before the advancing armies. From Virginia to Texas the Army found itself acting as the civil government in every respect: from the regulation of the cotton and tobacco trade to the use of provost marshals as police. As the war drew to a conclusion the responsibilities of the Army only increased, particularly with the establishment of the Freedmans' Bureau, the Office of Proscription and the Secret Service. The Army found itself pursuing proscripted persons, arresting counterfeiters, and protecting freed slaves from exploitation...

    After the passing of the Naturalization Act of 1865 and the Confiscation Act of the same year the South was effectively denied access to the majority of its experienced political leaders. Not only that but it was also denied the classes of persons from whom it would normally have drawn their replacements. The plantation classes and their supporters were effectively expatriated or proscribed. Until new electoral rolls could be complied, military governments would remain in each Southern state. Even after the election of new state governments military department heads remained imbued with wide ranging emergency powers to overrule these 'inexperienced' politicians. (Powers that ultimately would lead to the conflict between the army high command under Kearny and the Supreme Court under Davis). To quote Edward Bragg "the country remains divided between the President ruling over a Northern Republic and the General in Chief ruling over his Southern Feudal Kingdom"...

    220px-GenESBragg.jpg

    Bragg the soldier was a loyal Union man. Bragg the politician would never dance to the tune of National Unionism

    Under these Reconstruction Acts the district commanders had to deal with issues such as rioting (particularly in the aftermath of the passage of the 14th Amendment), civil court proceedings, regulating commerce, public education, enforcing expatriation, administering elections and mid-wiving constitutional conventions. This occupation engaged fully two thirds of the Army's strength in the period 1865-68. Even as the Southern states were restored to the Union, military authority was maintained in many areas. It would be many years before peace could be fully restored..."

    From “Armed Resistance - Organised and Violent Opposition to Reconstruction” by Dr Guy Burchett
    LSU 1997


    "Though few bands existed and even less recruited more than a few dozen members, armed resistance to Reconstruction and its policies persisted. In South Carolina many proscripted persons went into hiding. Attacks on African American community leaders began. Servants of the Reconstructionist Civil Government were at risk as soon as they left the towns. The Sons of the Palmetto perhaps had no more than 40 members at its height. Yet every incident, every outrage seemed attributed to its actions...

    In Alabama there were the Red Mountain Boys, named after the location of the lynching of an African American who was offering paid work to former slaves in nearby Birmingham...

    In Texas the former members of the Texas Rangers (or perhaps the 8th Texas Cavalry - Terry's Texas Rangers) would become one of the most persistent and longest lasting holdouts against Reconstruction. Frequently using the chaos in Mexico to slip over the border Joseph Hooker described them as more damaging to Texas than the Apache...

    As long as such resistance existed Congress would insist that the Army maintain garrisons in the Southern states. Dealing with these diehards was more of a nuisance that a threat on a national scale, but the Radicals ensured such resistance received national coverage...

    It would remain the responsibility of the army notwithstanding the restoration of state militia forces under the Reconstructionist State Governments. Many of these new militia forces consisted of African Americans and were the subject of direct attacks themselves on occasions. These militia forces mainly performed general police duties, save in South Carolina where General Peck ensured they played an equal part in dealing with the attacks of the Sons of the Palmetto and other diehards..."

    313.jpg

    South Carolina Militia

    From "Kearny's Army - The United States Army from the Civil War to the Emperors' War"
    MacArthur University 2007


    "Aside from some engagements with the Native American tribes the Army engaged in no conventional military operations of any consequnce until the final year of Lincoln's second term when it embarked upon its most ambitious international undertaking since the war with the Barbary States..."

    From “The United States Legion” from an article by Paul Bernouli
    North & South Magazine 2009


    "Following the attempted assassination of President Lincoln it was clear to many that the act was part of a wider conspiracy to murder prominent government officials. In response a number of officers attached to General Kearny's headquarters decided to form a 'legion' whose primary purpose would be the protection of General Kearny. The Legion founded by Louis Fitzgerald, Chauncey McKeever and Philip Kearny jr. grew quickly beyond its original purpose into a fraternal organisation for veterans of the Civil War...

    Within a year the Kearny Legion had morphed into the United States Legion, though its original founding principal was honored in other ways. Holders of the Kearny Cross in the Legion were members of a special class called the Companions of the Cross. In future decades as holders of that unique award passed away their privileges passed to the Companions of Honor - holders of the Medal of Honor...

    attachment.php

    Part of the Ceremonial Sash of a Companion of the Cross in the United States Legion

    Philip Kearny jr. quickly founded the first regimental branch of the Legion in his own 11th New Jersey, then acting as guards for General Kearny in late 1864. When he became aware of the organisation General Kearny warmly endorsed the idea of the 'Legion' but suggested its primary function should be as a fraternal organisation whose purpose should be to guard the goals for which the war had been fought rather than the life of any one man. Kearny himself had been an active member of the Aztec Club for veterans of the Mexican War, and his first official act in the United States following his return from Europe was to join his local New Jersey branch of the Legion...

    By the time of the first national meeting, on May 18th 1866 at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, there were already almost a quarter of a million active members...

    With large numbers of members in every state the Legion had the potential to be a potent political force. In many states it was quickly harnessed by ambitious men keen to wield its numbers in service of Republican/National Unionist, pro-army. pro-veteran causes. The United States Legion prospered as the veterans' arm of the National Union movement during the prosecution of Reconstruction measures...

    The Legion sought to protect the rights of negro and Indian veterans, celebrating their patriotism and sacrifices. The Legion became one of the first racially integrated fraternal organisations in the United States...

    To list the early state leaders of the Legion is to list a who's who of American politics for a generation. To name just a few:
    • John C. McClernand: Captain-General of the Illinois Legion 1868-1876
    • Anson George McCook: Captain-General of the Ohio Legion 1871-1880
    • Lew Wallace: Captain-General of the Indiana Legion 1868-1878
    • Russell A. Alger: Captain-General of the Michigan Legion 1875-1885
    • Daniel Sickles: Captain-General of the New York Legion 1868-1872
    160224.jpg

    United States Legion Parade 1889

    From "Life After War - The Civil War's Injured" by Freddy Campion
    Janus 2014


    "The war generated hundreds of thousands of casualties, and more wounded soldiers than any other American war save one. In the aftermath of the war, a huge new population of disabled men had to incorporated back into society. Not only that but they had to be provided for. Disabled veterans were a common part of daily life in America for decades afterwards...

    During the war the United States Sanitary Commission proposed a plan for the expected flood of disabled veterans. The Commission's report on a "System for the Economical Relief of Disabled Soldiers" outlined a plan of action for how disabled veterans should be integrated into society. Those involved in the report were men of business and industry and as a result the Report wisely focused on the economic consequences of the injured veterans' predicament...

    "Every measure, tending to fuse Invalids into a class with particular privileges or immunities, should be discountenanced. Nor should any such accumulations of them be encouraged in any locality, as would render them independent of public opinion, or segregate them from friends or kindred... As far as possible, invalids should be restored to their original homes, and the communities to which they belong should absorb them, by assigning to them, by conventional agreement, the lighter occupations; and no provision separating them from their families, or diminishing their domestic responsibilities should be encouraged. For, wherever invalids have homes, public opinion should be directed to these as the best places for them, the object always being to keep them from ultimately drifting into town or county pauper asylums...Home is generally the best hospital, even as repose is often the best remedy."

    The Sanitary Commission did however recognize that many disabled veterans had no homes to return to. For such men institutions were proposed: The Soldiers' Homes. Financial aid for these institutions came from a variety of sources: federal, state, municipal, and private charity including huge sums raised by the United States Legion and other veterans organisations...

    For those injured to the point of requiring "lighter occupations" the prospects were not inspiring: broom makers, button makers, cigar makers, daguerrotypists, engravers, postmen, hatters, newspaper vendors, tailors, and teachers...

    auQbOzY.jpg

    Samuel Decker built his own prosthetics and went on to become Official Doorkeeper of the House of Representatives

    In the latter decades of the 19th century, the social structures that shaped the lives of people with disabilities changed as urbanization and industrialization separated the home and the workplace. The rapidly expanding urban, and largely immigrant, labor force often lacked extended family resources. The problem of caring for people with disability loomed ever larger. One class to suffer were the immigrants of the Eastern cities: especially the Irish where their families were back in the 'old country'...

    Recognizing the overwhelming number of amputations resulting from combat, the Lincoln administration committed itself to the "Great Civil War Benefaction". This was a commitment by the Government to provide prosthetics to all disabled veterans who needed them...

    All across the United States entrepreneurs began competing for a share of the burgeoning prosthetics market. However the quality of the prosthetics available was poor. Few devices were comfortable. Those who had lost legs found crutches the easiest option...

    Rubber began to replace rigid substances mid-war as the material of choice for replacement limbs. Rubber was more resilient, more flexible and more natural in appearance than either wood or metal...

    It is surprising to look at these early prosthetics. The rubber hands produced by 1865 have fingers that could move under pressure, with enough action to permit small objects like a fork or pencil to be held. Some were almost Swiss Army knife-like in their utility, allowing the user to swap the hand for hooks, brushes, sawing attachments, and various other tools and accessories...

    The Civil War marked the end of the era of wooden peg legs and simple hooks. The war set the prosthetics industry on a course that would ultimately lead to better attempts to restore independence, productivity, and dignity to severely wounded veterans. Organisations like the United States Legion and the Magdala Club would ensure that the fate of disabled veterans could never be forgotten by any administration. For that matter the most famous amputee of them all would not forget his fellows either..."

    aug23philkearney-218x245.jpg

    General Commanding the Armies and amputee Philip Kearny​
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Eight The Great Exodus Part II - The Blue Eyed Prophet and the Promised Land
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Eight

    The Great Exodus Part II - The Blue Eyed Prophet and the Promised Land


    From “Viva Magruder! – The Early Days of the Anglo Community in Mexico” by D. Foster Wilkins
    University of Vancouver 1985


    “The largest settlement was Carlotta (the exilados grise always spelt the Empress’ name with two “l”s), which had been a town originally known as Cordoba. Given the number of American exiles during the first two years further settlements were established at Coatepec (now known to history as Coat’n’peg), and Tres Valles (Three Valleys). Significant exile communities could also been found in Mexico City, Tampico, Veracruz (at the right season – it was many years before the pioneering work of Doctor Holliday eased the threat of the “yellowjack”), and Tuxpan…

    The formal project was conceived by Commodore Matthew Fontaine Maury. As a result of his work for the Confederate States navy and his implication in the death of General McClellan, Commodore Maury had been proscribed and was thus unable to return home to Virginia. Maury, then an internationally famous oceanographer and naval expert, was a friend of Emperor Maximilian of long standing. He had been awarded a medal by the then Austrian Archduke before the Civil War. Maximilian had been head of the Austrian Navy and was attracted to Maury’s reputation as a great naval expert…

    220px-Commander_Matthew_Fontaine_Maury_USN_painting.jpg

    Founding Father of the Carlotta Colony

    Maury’s proposal gave form to the amorphous idea the Emperor had formed about the Confederate exiles then flowing into Mexico. The concept of rewarding Confederates (and anyone else for that matter) for military service in the cause of the Empire had been discussed but not resolved. Maury’s suggestion was that veterans and their families be rewarded with land grants. The Crown had ample land held over from the Republican government’s confiscation of Church land which the Emperor was not minded to return. The proposal was later expanded to reward skilled immigrants as well as veterans…

    The Emperor also cast his net beyond the gray exiles and eagerly sought soldiers and settlers from Austria, Belgium and France, as part of his strategy to rebuild and Europeanize Mexico…

    Maury foresaw a network of planned settlements primarily in the rich agricultural lands west of Veracruz. Given the huge numbers of exiles beginning to descend on Mexico by land and sea, a bureaucracy was necessary to manage the settlement. Maximilian’s government had neither the funds nor the manpower to properly staff it. Instead Commodore Maury was appointed Imperial Commissioner of Immigration and he assembled his own staff from former Confederates who worked, largely for a pittance, on the promise of the pick of the land grants…”

    From “I Rode With Prince John” by Colonel Ambrosio José Gonzales
    Carlotta 1885


    “When we inspected the troops at Nuevo Laredo I did not think much of General Shelby’s Texan Legion. They lacked the soldierly bearing of the fine men who had served under General Magruder’s command in the Army of the Mississippi. Nonetheless Governor Vidaurri spoke very highly of them. It seems the fact that even many of the enlisted men, Texans mostly, can pass themselves in Spanish lifts them head and shoulders above the French enlisted man in Mexican eyes. In any event General Shelby had quickly reclaimed a swath of border territory for Governor Vidaurri and the Emperor…

    attachment.php

    Governor and later Minister of Finance Santiago Vidaurri

    The message that General Magruder impressed upon General Shelby, which was ever on his lips, was to treat the Mexicans generously. The French could go home. We were home, such as it was, and must behave in Mexico as the very best of house guests…

    Following Marshal Bazaine’s success in the South at Oaxaca in February, we were delighted to hear in May of the victory of Shelby’s forces over the Juaristas at Vallecillo and the opening of the road to Monterrey…”

    From “The Great Exodus Re-examined” by William H. Sugarbrook
    Carlotta 1951


    “The arrival of General Magruder at the Imperial Court caused a great stir. The Confederate cause was lost and here was a mighty cavalier bereft of home and purpose. It was not long before the Emperor realized that John B. Magruder was a kindred soul. Magruder’s courtly ways appealed to the Emperor…

    The appointment of General Magruder to the Imperial service was inevitable…”

    From "The Mexican Adventure through American Eyes" by David Hofstedder
    LUS 1996


    I firmly hold it was the Empress, and not the Emperor, who saw the merit in General Magruder. I heard her say on more than one occasion that General Magruder serves the Empire, while Marshal Bazaine believes the Empire serves him!” Princess zu Salm-Salm…

    I find the Empress a revelation: she is very clever and practical. Indeed she is all business” John B. Magruder…

    index.php

    John B. Magruder as he appeared before the Imperial Court

    With French victories, in the south at Oaxaca in February and in the west at Guaymas in March [1865], the Empire of Mexico finally appeared to be getting stronger. A case for its success could finally be made. Money was flowing from Europe. The United States appeared distracted by the occupation of its Southern States and the business of proscription. The victory of Vidaurri’s grey legionaries at Vallecillo and the recapture of Monterrey in May enhanced the sense that momentum was finally building behind the Empire…

    valverde_lancers.jpg

    To make up for the lack of carbines Shelby outfitted some of his cavalry with surplus French lances

    It is easy to underestimate the popularity of Emperor Maximilian. Yet courting popularity seemed to be his primary purpose…

    He practiced twirling a lariat; at the bullfighting he wore a sombrero and shouted along with the crowd. The conservatives who made up Mexican society were shocked. The French gaped. I was firmly of the view that he had all the makings of a six term congressman or, if such a thing existed, a monarch of the people.” William Mahone.

    Even the liberals tell each other it is impossible to dislike him. I was riding with him, not long after Mallory and I reached Mexico City. He took a turn to walking his horse. A man’s hat, captured by the wind, blow past. The Emperor caught it as it flew by. He winked at me and then smiled as he handed it back to the man. The man, a noted liberal I learned after, yelled “Viva el Emperador”. The liberals here, though not yet monarchists, are surely Maximilianists” John H. Reagan…”

    From “The Great Exodus Re-examined” by William H. Sugarbrook
    Carlotta 1951


    “Perhaps the two greatest gifts the first wave of exiles offered the Mexican Empire were Spanish speaking teachers and Bilingual Newspapers…

    Many did not wish to take up arms again in the service of foreign crown. Yet a living must be made. With no land grants for non-combatants (at least until the end of 1866 and the enacting of the new Imperial Property laws) many exiles needed to find employment with some urgency. Not all were farmers or craftsmen. Not all were plantation owners who had squirreled money away in foreign accounts and investments. Yet many were educated men who spoke and wrote some Spanish. Many Texans and more than a few veterans of the Mexican-American War eked out a living as teachers in the small towns and larger villages of central Mexico…

    The more ambitious set up newspapers: in Carlotta; in Mexico City; in Veracruz; and in Tampico. Samuel Read Anderson, with only a few dollars in his pocket, set up the first printing press in Carlotta. “Before a foot of earth was tilled or a nail hammered into a board we exiles had an inked stained rag in circulation” (William Mahone). It would become an important tradition for the local teacher, in many cases an impoverished former rebel, to read from a newspaper once a week to the Indians of his town or village…”

    From “Viva Magruder! – The Early Days of the Anglo Community in Mexico” by D. Foster Wilkins
    University of Vancouver 1985


    “The former Confederates admired “Max” and the Indians loved him. Where before though the Indians had not acted on that love the truth and legends propounded by the Confederate news sheets began to shore up support for the new Emperor…

    The Emperor and Empress knew that the future of Mexico was bound up with the Indian masses in the countryside. They did everything they could to improve the Indian peasants lot and thus word of the new monarch’s commitment to the people spread: Maxmilian reduced the amount of money Indians could be obliged to owe; he outlawed the notion that debts could be passed from father to son; he forbade excessively long working days; and he abolished the alcalde’s recourse to corporal punishment…”

    From "The Mexican Adventure through American Eyes" by David Hofstedder
    LUS 1996


    It is known that the Emperor, in the romantic tradition of Shakespeare’s King Hal, goes incognito amongst his people. Of the many tales told to the Emperor one was reported to him of the enslavement of Indian peasants within Mexico City itself. Unable to get a straight answer from the noblemen of the Court, the Emperor resolved to go out himself into the City to test the truth of the reports. Finding the door to the bakery in question locked and the proprietor unwilling to open the door to a cloaked figure unwilling to give his name, the Emperor sent for the Palatine Guard under Count Karl Bombelles. The Austrian troops broke down the door to discover a veritable hell on earth. An underground furnace filled with fumes. A dozen chained peasants were freed at once…” A story from an edition of the January 1866 Carlotta Register that was widely re-printed and circulated…

    attachment.php

    Count Karl de Bombelles, Commandant of the Palatine Guards

    From “I Rode With Prince John” by Colonel Ambrosio José Gonzales
    Carlotta 1885


    “The state of Michoacán lies within 100 miles of Mexico City. Its proximity to the capital combined with its heavy forests, mountainous terrain and difficult weather made it ideal for Juarista operations. The state's rebellious population was at that time sympathetic to the Juarista cause. The Emperor found it unacceptable to have Juarista troops operating so close to the capital without opposition. It was clearly important, both strategically and politically, that our forces quell Juarista activity in Michoacán to prevent teach the rebels a lesson…

    On June 15, 1865, General Magruder had 500 Belgians occupy Tacámbaro. Shortly thereafter Juarista General Nicolas Regules was lured into attacking the Belgians with between 2,500 and 3,000 rebel soldiers. I was there as liaison between General Magruder and Baron van der Smissen of the Belgian contingent…

    Surrounded from all sides, the Belgians held out for five hours. When General Regules had committed all his forces to the assault, General Magruder deployed his troops: a battalion of Imperial Americans under Colonel Reuben Walker, one of French voltigeurs, the remaining Belgian troops and two regiments of Mexican cavalry. The Juaristas were routed. The deployment of the cavalry caused huge numbers to surrender. General Regules himself was taken, another victim of General Magruder’s mastery of the art of deception in war…

    Come Fall General Magruder had pacified Michoacán. The campaigns there did the Imperial Americans and indeed the Imperial Belgians much credit. It also did much to embolden the Mexicans in the Imperial service who up til then had not always been foremost to the fray…”

    vandersmissen.jpg
    cambel4.jpg

    Colonel Baron Van Der Smissen and the uniforms of the Imperial Belgians

    From "The Mexican Adventure through American Eyes" by David Hofstedder
    LUS 1996


    “Come the spring of 1866 only Chihuahua and Sonora remained unequivocally under President Juarez’s control, with elements of Coahuila, Sinaloa and Durango. For those with Juarez intelligence on events and resistance elsewhere in the country was hard to come by…

    The resurgent Viduarri was using General Shelby’s troops well. Deploying Mexican conscripts along the border to avoid angering the United States forces now in control of Texas, the Texan Legion, French Foreign Legionaries and Lancers and most frighteningly (for the rebels) Colonel Charles Lupin’s Contra-Guerrillas were waging an ever increasingly aggressive fight in Coahuila and Durango…

    One further unit in the Mexican service left General Jo Shelby and most other former Confederates in the Imperial Service lost for words: The 'Ottoman Auxiliary Battalion' made up of primarily Sudanese troops under Egyptian officers and commanded by Captain Mohammed Almaz. The Auxiliary Battalion was transferred from Veracruz to guard the supply route between Monterrey and Saltillo. The sight of armed negros under officers of "various shades" (William MacRae) drove home the fact to the exiles that slavery was already illegal in Mexico and the south could not be remade here in Northern Mexico...

    teaserbox_4100854049.jpg

    French marines were landed on the Pacific coast further isolating Juarez from communication with the rebels in the south…

    Poor Juarez now lives backed up against our border. He has come to rest in the sleepy border town of Paso del Norte. He can go no further” General Joseph Hooker reporting to General Philip Kearny…

    “Advised by the republican governor of the state of Chihuahua to flee to the United States Juarez said “Don Luis, no one knows this state better than you. Show me the highest, most inaccessible and driest mountain, and I will go there to the top of it and die there of hunger and thirst wrapped up in the flag of our republic…” (Charles Dana, a fervent opponent of the Lincoln policy of inaction on Mexico, who visited Juarez in 1866)

    From “The Blue Eyed Prophet of War” by Robert Lee Thomas
    Carlotta Press 1906


    “The tone of acceptance and reconciliation that Thomas Jackson had adopted in Fort Delaware was no passing fancy. It was emblematic of a prolonged period of reflection undertaken during almost 18 months imprisonment…

    Upon the official pronouncement of his proscription Mr. Jackson was transported to the passenger ship S.S. Belleisle. His wife Mary and four year old daughter Julia awaited him onboard. Their destination was the Mexican port of Veracruz…

    Jackson_Mary.jpg

    Mary Jackson and daughter Julia

    Having graciously but firmly refused service in the army of Emperor Maximilian Mr. Jackson was provided with a generous grant of land near Three Valleys. The former teacher and soldier now took up farming or rather the cultivation of lemon, lines and the occasional pineapple. It was considered something of a tradition for veterans who served under Stonewall Jackson to seek out his farm (he never called it a plantation) and purchase some lemonade…

    Towards the end of 1867 he wrote what became a widely publicized letter to his sister, Laura Arnold of Beverley West Virginia, as part of their on-going reconciliation which had begun with correspondence exchanged between them while he languished in his northern imprisonment…

    …I do not declare myself any great expert on the cultivation of fruit but I do know a good lemon and it would be a great sin to let this land and this new opportunity go to waste due to any lack of ambition or effort. I am much given to reflection on this opportunity for a new beginning…

    As you once where given to notice I have not usually written much nor indeed much of consequence, it being contrary to my nature. Given now the great distance between us and my sincere belief that you above all will understand what I have come to believe I have sought in these letters to remedy my former failing…

    Reconciled as I am to our loss I have given myself over to this place, our new beginning. Yet the long days of my imprisonment and my contemplations there remain with me. I fought for Virginia and knowing all that I do I cannot even now conceive of doing other than I did. Yet I have been forced to consider the possibility that Virginia’s cause was neither right nor godly. There were those imprisoned with me who believed most firmly that our cause was irretrievably blackened with the sin of slavery. Long have I prayed on the question as you suggested. I never had strong views on slavery and ever sought to avoid a consideration of the question. Perhaps that is the greatest sin of all. I fear I have played the Levite to my fellow and always passed the other way…

    The terrible revelation which is now mine is that the institution of slavery was and is wrong and I fear deeply sinful. No nation built upon the chains of others can long survive. Once I accepted this truth it became clear to me why He had turned from us and our country…

    I have been truly moved by President Lincoln’s grace and mercy. His guiding hand is to be seen quite clearly in the mercy shown us by a great man with better reason than any to hate those who he calls rebels. The cost of such mercy is to be everlasting exiles from the land of our birth. So be it. We must strive harder to serve His will. I view my exile to this land, not as a punishment, but as an opportunity to start anew. To covenant with Him afresh and to reaffirm our commitment to do his will…

    If the bloodshed is to have meaning for those of us in exiles it behoves us to seek it out. I propose to commit myself to exhort others to consider our fate, as I have done, and to find solace in a new purpose in His service…


    Laura Arnold circulated the letter in the hope of sparing the Jacksons’ limited estate from confiscation and in the wider hope of promoting reconciliation between North and South. Whatever the public reaction in the North, and it was muted, it did provoke a storm both in the Old South and amongst the exiles in Mexico…

    James Longstreet endorsed every word, calling Thomas Jackson “wiser, humbler and more honorable in defeat than any man I have known in victory”. William Mahone put a different spin on the defeat “I agree slavery is a curse. The negro is a curse. We are better off in Mexico without them. Let every man profit from the sweat of his own brow and be done with it.” Others like Wigfall and O’Neal called Jackson a traitor and Black Republican…

    attachment.php

    James D. Convers' painting "Jackson Looks Inwards"

    Initially mortified at the publication of his correspondence Mr. Jackson was nonetheless quick to defend his views when challenged. On March 8, 1868 he spoke at the invitation of Rev. Joseph R. Wilson at Three Valleys Presbyterian Church to explain his views. What began as a lecture to be given by rote from pre-learned notes swiftly became a prayer meeting as the Holy Spirit worked through Thomas Jackson. Exhorting the crowd, now a congregation, to give thanks for their transportation to this promised land, Mr. Jackson called upon them to commit their lives to building a new Eden in Mexico in service of the 'One Who Made Us All'. The Third Great Awakening had arrived in Mexico and its prophet was a blue-eyed lemon farmer who had survived and been transformed by his dark night of the soul…”

    attachment.php

    An "Imperial American" addresses a mounted French Truco

    From “Viva Magruder! – The Early Days of the Anglo Community in Mexico” by D. Foster Wilkins
    University of Vancouver 1985


    “While Governor Viduarri, Generals Magruder, Shelby and Tomas Mejia scored victories in the North and West, the bulk of French troops were becoming bogged down in the south trying to pin down and defeat an army under General Porfirio Diaz. While the net drew ever tighter around Juarez during 1866 the French and the Republicans traded victories in the south…

    In a calculated risk that infuriated the Imperial Government and ensured General Shelby’s ultimate dismissal from the Imperial service, he had directed a Texan cavalry battalion to slip across the Mexican border to attack Paso del Norte from the north. President Juarez had few troops in the town itself and the attack quickly became a rout…

    On February 3 1867 the body of Benito Juarez was brought before Governor Vidaurri at Chihuahua by Contra-guerrillas. American observers were horrified at the state of the body, but all acknowledged that the Juarista rebellion could not continue without Juarez himself. Little did they account for Porfirio Diaz…”

    Cammeroneaaa.jpg

    From "The Reconstruction Era" by Michael Baylor
    Grosvenor 2006


    “The question was whether the Emperor’s Grand Scheme would work in practice – a volatile mix of monarchists versus republicans; catholics versus protestants; conservatives versus liberals; Mexicans versus foreigners; Native Indians versus Hispanic Grandees. Maximilian’s support was a divided as his opposition had been…”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine Domestic Bliss: Part One
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine

    Domestic Bliss: Part One



    d49206dcf682021c401baaee8b5e210e--abraham-lincoln-secretary.jpg

    Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase

    From “Chasing the White House – Salmon P. Chase and his Campaign to be President” by Albert Niven
    Grosvenor 2001


    “For Secretary Chase the victory in the Slaveholders’ Rebellion had only been won because he had personally ensured the Federal Government had remained solvent. His tally of the war was one of battles won and lost certainly, but not in the fields of Virginia or on the banks of the Mississippi, but in the halls of Congress and in the banking houses of New York…

    While Stockdale’s surrender ended the war for most Chase continued to fight his battles for what he viewed as the necessary outcome of his four exhausting years in the Treasury Building, a Chase Presidency…

    Re-appointed to the Treasury after Lincoln’s re-election Chase was faced with the herculean task of returning the nation’s finances to a more normal footing. He had several objectives: the first of which was to reduce the amount of counterfeit currency in circulation. It was estimated up to a third of all paper and specie in the country may have been counterfeit at this time…

    Stanton’s success in ensuring the Secret Service answered to him further deepened Chase’s loathing for the man. The friendship born in Columbus twenty years earlier was dead, at least as far as Chase was concerned. After the swearing in of Chief George Sharpe as the first head of the Secret Service Chase referred to Stanton as “selfish, insincere, a dissembler, and treacherous"…

    Stanton had serious concerns about the greenbacks in circulation. He feared his creation had the potential to destabilize the economy and, as its author, his reputation. He declared that no more paper currency should be issued. He sought to consolidate the government’s substantial debt, framing measures adopted by congress which permitted the consolidation and funding of the government loans into 4% and 4.5% bonds…

    The prohibition on issue of further greenbacks was not enough. He was confronted in the late Spring of 1865 with rising inflation. The cause: the government's wartime issue of greenbacks. Chase recommended the phased retirement of the fiat paper and a return to the gold standard. Come fall the problem had become worse and he strongly urged the retirement of the greenbacks and a subsequent resumption of specie payments…

    1f25e60fd83fd42815e0087f5f95374d.jpg

    Chase’s stewardship of the nation’s finances during the war had been nothing short of superb and, whatever the President’s misgivings about Chase’s personality, he trusted him implicitly on financial questions. Indeed so too did many in Congress. So his proposals met with support. However it would be wrong to say they were ever popular with any faction in Congress. Any reduction in the supply of currency was going to be unpopular during the postwar reconstruction and continuing national expansion…

    The Currency Adjustment Act was passed in early 1866, authorizing the retirement of not more than $10,000,000 in six months and not more than $2,000,000 per month thereafter. The Act would be repealed by the 40th Congress after less than $32,000,000 in greenbacks had been retired. Chase’s plan had been derailed by the Supreme Court’s support for the constitutionality of fiat money as legal tender [the cases of Hibbert v Downey and Towler v Van Decker will be reviewed the a subsequent Chapter on the Supreme Court]…

    Chase claimed no small hand in drafting Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, though it is now accepted he was merely consulted by Holt and the Congressional drafters. Nonetheless it was during his term in office that the principle was enshrined in the Constitution that, not only was the debt of the so called Confederacy repudiated, but that any debts incurred in the pursuit of rebellion or insurrection against the United States would forever be void for their unlawfulness…

    During the remainder of his tenure Chase maintained a firm policy of reducing the nation’s accumulated war debt and the careful reintroduction of federal taxation in the South. He desperately wished to oppose the cost of the post-war expansion of the army but feared crossing Kearny who’s popularity knew no bounds and the Radicals who’s vengeance knew none either…

    While he successfully re-established the mechanisms for collecting taxes in the South the depression of the Southern economy meant the revenue was disappointing throughout the latter half of the 1860s…

    The compensation for Chase was his perceived control of the Bureau of Collectors and its ever growing revenue. Chase believed he had the measure of Jacob Cox and Cox was happy to oblige him, at least in the liberal appointment of Ohioans. Whether Cox was promoting Chase’s cause or his own was not a question that crossed Chase’s mind… ”

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    “After the jubilation of passing the 13th Amendment Congress quickly turned inwards to re-examine its own workings with the view of meeting the postwar needs of the nation. The first step the House took was to split the function of the mighty Committee on Ways and Means into three parts. The passage of legislation affecting taxation would remain with Ways and Means under the chairmanship of John Armor Bingham of Ohio. The power to regulate banking was transferred to the Committee on Banking and Commerce under George S. Boutwell of Massachusetts. The power to appropriate money, in effect to control the federal pursestrings, was given to the newly created Appropriations Committee. Thaddeus Stevens took control of the Appropriations Committee despite the best efforts of more orthodox Radicals. It was a rare occasion during the 39th Congress that Benjamin Wade did not get his way, but then as Lincoln noted any Senator that stuck his hand “into the embers of the House and stirred them about was liable to get his fingers burnt”…”

    220px-BinghamFacingForward.jpg
    220px-George_Boutwell%2C_Brady-Handy_photo_portrait%2C_ca1870-1880.jpg
    220px-Thaddeus_Stevens_-_Brady-Handy-crop.jpg

    John A. Bingham, George S. Boutwell and Thaddeus Stevens

    From “The Court of Reconstruction – the David Davis Court” by Robert Yelland Hoke
    MacFarland Legal Press 1997


    “The Judicial Circuits Act of 1866 reorganized the United States circuit courts and provided for the elimination of one seat on the Supreme Court of the United States upon the death or retirement of the next Justice. It was signed into law in May 1866 by President Lincoln. Davis had proposed a redrawing of the judicial circuit boundaries, reducing the number of circuits from ten to nine. He also believed it made sense for the eventual reduction in the number of seats on the Supreme Court from the ten that had been authorized in 1863 to nine. One for each circuit. The plan had the endorsement of Attorney General Speed…”

    From “The Noblest of Undertakings” by T. Peck Williams
    University of Virginia 2008


    “The work of the 39th Congress in promoting, for the common good, the station of the freedman was constant…

    The attempted passage of the Southern Homestead Act of 1866 saw the Radical Republicans split and indeed many conservatives were clearly divided. The proposal, boosted strongly by Oliver O. Howard of the Freedmen’s Bureau, was that freedmen, poor tenant farmers and sharecroppers in the south should have the right to apply for the lands now held under the stewardship of the Bureau of Collectors in the South…

    The proposal was that the act should open up over 60 million acres of public and confiscated land for sale in the Southern states. It was to be parceled up into 160 acre plots and homesteaders would be required to occupy and improve the land for five years before acquiring full ownership…

    Benjamin Wade decried the proposed legislation. The southern states were in the midst of constitutional conventions which would lead to the presence of Southern Unionists and African-Americans in the 40th Congress. Should not “the loyal men of the Southern most parts of our Union have a say in the distribution of this, their most precious resource – Southern land”. George Washington Julian said it was "repugnant to all principles of justice to charge men for the ownership of land made fertile only by their toil, their blood and that of their fathers." Wade had an eye to winning the support of the republicans who would inevitably be returned from the south in the impending midterms. He was not alone. Fearing a loss of the Treasury Department’s Kingdom constituted in the assets managed by the Bureau of Collectors Secretary Chase and Director Cox put their strength into the balance against passage of the Act. The alliance of leading Radicals, Ohioans and less scrupulous members who saw the Act as the waste of a source of party spoils, saw the Act was defeated…

    Howard had accepted the post of director of the Freedmen’s Bureau on a temporary basis. The failure of the Southern Homestead Act was, to him at least, a personal blow. He tendered his resignation to Secretary Stanton immediately following the voting down of the Act. Within a matter of days General John J. Peck was summoned from his Headquarters in Savannah and offered the appointment of Director…

    In stark relief to Howard's resignation, Peck’s appointment would be met with passage of the Second Freedmen’s Bureau Bill. As though in recompense for the failure of the Southern Homestead Act Congress promptly renewed the charter for the Bureau. More importantly it was not only refunded but its funding was increased from the revenue collected by the Bureau of Collections. President Lincoln joyfully signed it into law in the summer of 1866...”

    attachment.php

    John J. Peck - "Shepherd in Chief" of the Fighting Lambs would now become shepherd of a whole race
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine Domestic Bliss: Part Two
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine

    Domestic Bliss: Part Two

    From “The Radicals 1860-1872” by Hugh W. McGrath
    New England Press 2001


    During the 39th Congress the Joint Committee on Reconstruction continued to “enquire into the condition of the States which formed the Confederate States of America, and report on their progress towards restoration to the Union and the reconstruction of their civil life." There were changes to its membership arising out of the consolidation of the radicals' power. Senator Henry Wilson of Massachusetts replaced Fessenden as chairman. Wade had wanted the position but, having been chairman of the Committee on Conduct of the War, many of his fellow senators, including many radicals, thought he was trying to concentrate too much power in his own hands. Nonetheless he was chair of the most influential (and feared) of the three subcommittees: the Proscription Review Committee constituted under the Naturalization Act of 1865...

    220px-Henry_Wilson%2C_VP_of_the_United_States.jpg

    Senator Henry Wilson of Massachusetts

    The joint committee included nine members from the House, and six from the Senate. During the 39th Congress the House members were: Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA), Elihu Washburne (R-IL), Benjamin Butler (R-MA), James F. Wilson (R-IA), Roscoe Conkling (R-NY), George Washington Julian (R-IN), Henry Blow (NU-MO), Aaron Harding (D-KY), and Charles E. Phelps (INU-MD). The Senate members were: William Fessenden (R-ME), Benjamin Wade (R-OH), Jacob Howard (R-MI), George Henry Williams (R-OR), Ira Harris (R-NY), and Lovell Rousseau (NU-KY). Harding was the only Democrat and he had declared himself a Unionist on his previous elections to the 37th and 38th Congresses. General Kearny noted with disapproval that the Missouri representative was the sole Missourian in Congress not to have served in uniform…”

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    “The President’s Proclamation of Abandonment and its endorsement by Congress had made reconstituting the legitimate voters of the southern states simple on paper. In practice a great deal of effort was required to ensure that the wheat (southern unionists, freedmen, spinners and their like who had been re-naturalized) from the chaff (southern veterans, former Confederate and state officials, and others who had voluntarily engaged in expatriation but who had not yet merited proscription)…

    As a check on these “reformed” electorates Congress required that each state draft a new state constitution, which would have to be approved by Congress. After Ex Parte Orr (1867) came before the Supreme Court, Congress feared that the Court might strike down elements of the Reconstruction Acts as unconstitutional. This was the first step on the long road to conflict between General Phil Kearny and Chief Justice David Davis…

    ihy0102321.jpg

    Chief Justice David Davis of whom more will be heard later

    To prevent this, Congress repealed the Habeas Corpus Act 1867, revoking the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over the case…”

    From "The Great Constitutional Crisis" by Dr. Lee M. King
    Carlotta 1962


    The constitutional conventions held in 1866 were held in an atmosphere of amateurism and confusion as inexperienced state “leaders” attempted to satisfy the requirements of the Federal Government for returning to the Union in time for mid-term elections. The conventions assembled under the guise of local authority but in truth it was the Federal government that dictated their actions…

    These representatives could not easily replace the experience of the past and thus these meetings often followed the established state protocols, though somewhat restricted by Federal guidelines...

    360732882.jpg

    Constitutional Conventions would take place in all the former Confederate States in 1866 and 1867

    U.S. President Abraham Lincoln had agreed upon a compromise with the radicals of his own party, though it was obviously objectionable to him. The quick return of states to the fold was balanced against the swingeing disenfranchisement of American citizens...

    Qualifications for delegates to state conventions were more restrictive than they had been in previous conventions due to federally imposed rules. They were required to take an oath of loyalty to the U.S. Government; accept the U.S. Constitution; all federal laws; and crucially the Emancipation Proclamation. Finally they also had to swear they knew of no grounds upon which they were expatriated persons - a clear breach of their 5th Amendment rights…

    Each convention followed a similar script: the delegates assembled and, as charged by the Federal plan, took up the business of rejoining the Union. They abolished slavery by ratifying the Thirteenth Amendment. They nullified the state's Ordinance of Secession (thus forever denying the state’s right to secede which would have been preserved by repeal). They repudiated any state war debt. Finally they proceeded to write a new constitution…

    The Federal mandates imposed upon the Conventions seemed to crush the notion of states’ rights and forever blurred the boundaries between federal and state sovereignty...”

    From “The Noblest of Undertakings” by T. Peck Williams
    University of Virginia 2008


    “In anticipation of the State Conventions the Freedmen’s Bureau conducted massive voter registrations to include black males of the same eligibility as non-expatriated white males. The army was widely involved in this process (the degree largely depending on the sympathies of the regional commander). Once this process was complete, eligible voters, black and white, went to the polls to select delegates to the convention. Since many of the planter class and other conservative white voters in the South had been proscribed or simply expatriated it was the case in several states that first time black voters determined the outcome of elections to the convention. This was particularly true in South Carolina. Throughout the South Republicans, moderate and radical, dominated the conventions over a handful of white traditional conservatives/Democrats…

    As directed by the congressional Reconstruction Acts, the conventions proposed new constitutions that included suffrage for black males...

    By the time of the midterms several of the Southern States were ready for readmission to Congress…”

    127459-004-9069703F.jpg

    Freedmen's Suffrage

    From “The Radicals 1860-1872” by Hugh W. McGrath
    New England Press 2001


    “Many refer to the mid-term elections of 1866/67 as being a further extension of radical power. Certainly more radicals were returned to Congress but much more so in the House than in the Senate. In fact only James McClatchy of California was consistently radical in his voting record and even then he was noted as standing apart from the radical machine as run by Benjamin Wade. Lincoln saw a handful of reliable supporters returned: James W. Nye of Nevada and Henry W. Corbett of Oregon to name but two. Other, less personally loyal but entirely conservative senators returned in 1866 included Simon Cameron of Pennsylvania, Oliver P. Morton of Indiana, Thomas E. Bramlette of Kentucky and John Sherman of Ohio…

    The House of Representatives
    attachment.php

    Another trend that did not bode well for the radicals continued with the election of General Orris S. Ferry, formerly of the Fighting Lambs of the Army of the James, to the Senate from Connecticut and General James White Geary of XII Corps as Governor of Pennsylvania…”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine Domestic Bliss: Part Three
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine

    Domestic Bliss: Part Three

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    “Looking back there had been little time to mourn his wife’s death. Within a few weeks he had been re-elected president by an overwhelming majority (with only his wife’s home state of Kentucky arrayed against him). A few weeks after that Stockdale surrendered on behalf of what remained of the Confederacy. The time in between was filled with the management of the 38th Congress: the Proclamation of Abandonment; a new Confiscation Act; a new Naturalization Act; an Undesirable Aliens Act. Then his Second Inauguration…and passage of the 13th Amendment…

    Ironic that, at the time he granted General Kearny leave to recover his health, his own was deteriorating. An April cold had, by May, left the President bedridden. His doctors diagnosed a ‘plural effusion’. Robert feared it was pneumonia. Lincoln described feeling like “a collapsed steam engine: the pressure had built and built and built for years. Then its sudden disappearance caused the structure to collapse in on itself”…

    attachment.php

    There was some unseemly discord when Secretary Chase sought to convene a cabinet meeting only to have Vice President Holt arrive and assert a right to chair it. The problem was resolved when Lincoln appeared and chaired the meeting in his bedsheets. It was the first public indication of his improving health…”

    From “Drawing Together – Abraham and Robert in the Post-War Years” from an article by Joshua K. Brogan
    New England Journal of History 2009


    “Many had feared for President Lincoln’s health during the years of the rebellion, fears confirmed by his collapse in May 1865. Yet in recovering it seemed as though the troubles of the war had been purged…

    During that summer at the Soldiers Home John Hay reported that he “had never seen the Tycoon in such high spirits…He thinks nothing of spending hours playing with Tad and his friends. Often the President leads one band of rapscallions and I am conscripted to lead the other…”. John Hay’s role was temporary. On Robert’s return from Europe he moved back into the White House with his father. The two began to spend their leisure time together. Robert would recount all he had seen and heard in Europe. Often these discussions would take place in the evening and Secretary Seward and occasionally Vice President Holt would join them. The son was now treated as a man...

    Kearny’s request that Robert remain on his staff until the final mustering out “as an example to others kept unwillingly in uniform by the necessities of peace” meant he had employment close at hand, at least to the final mustering out of the volunteers…”

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    “Lincoln had a fierce appetite for work and seemed irrepressibly joyous in the most mundane unwarlike business of governing in peace…

    The twin pillars of Reconstruction for the President himself were (i) the protection of the hard won freedoms of the African Americans and (ii) the rehabilitation of the South…

    His talk of colonization in 1866 won him new friends among worried conservatives and he spent that political capital ensuring the passage of the 14th Amendment received the broad support of both flanks of the Republican party in the 40th Congress…

    The conservatives were easier to mollify once it became apparent that the threatened deluge of freedmen into the northern section did not materialize. Much migration did occur but it was largely internal to the south with the west acting as the relief valve…most often it was to South Carolina, Mississippi and to a lesser degree Louisiana. States where African American majorities were conceivable, at times even without the expatriation of huge sections of the white electorate…

    Lincoln’s frequent weighing into the balance against the Radicals was intended to maintain a balance of power within the party and within Congress. It naturally earned him the enmity of several leading Radicals and none more so that Benjamin Wade. Yet none could openly challenge the President, such was his enduring popularity…”

    From “Drawing Together – Abraham and Robert in the Post-War Years” from an article by Joshua K. Brogan
    New England Journal of History 2009


    “The income from army commission gave Robert the appearance of being able to support a wife, though it remained his intention to study law. There was also the issue that the White House was lacking a hostess though it had no shortage of Lincoln men…

    Perhaps it was prolonged exposure to Phil Kearny, always the proponent of the bold and unconventional in both love and war, that convinced Robert to wait no longer. He proposed to Lucy Lambert Hale in the spring of 1866…

    Before the end of his presidency ‘Father Abraham’, as the freedmen knew him, would become Grandfather Abraham following the birth of Kearny Hale Lincoln…”

    orig-madonna.jpg

    Mother and son

    From “The Radicals 1860-1872” by Hugh W. McGrath
    New England Press 2001


    The Supreme Court’s increasing hostility to what David Davis characterized as “the military’s annexation to itself of the duties of the judicial branch of government” made many radicals increasingly uncomfortable. There was a persistent belief, entirely unfounded given the composition of the Court, that the Supreme Court would one day override the post war settlement. The fear also existed that a resurgent Democratic party might one day return to dominate Congress and likewise unravel the hard work of the Radical Republicans…

    The response was predictable: the radical Republicans would ensure the rights of freedmen and the principles of expatriation and proscription were incorporated into a 14th Amendment to the Constitution…

    The content of the 14th Amendment accurately reflects the concerns and priorities of the 40th Congress and indeed the 39th which had preceded it. In summary:

    1. Citizenship was guaranteed to all people naturalized or born in the United States;
    2. The right to renounce that citizenship, through either word or deed, was an inalienable right of every citizen;
    3. Equal protection under the law for all citizens;
    4. Endorsement of the repayment by the federal government for the money borrowed to fight the Civil War;
    5. Repudiation, not only of the Confederate war debt (by both federal and states governments), but of any indebtedness incurred in the course of a rebellion against the nation and the constitution;
    6. The reservation to the executive and legislative branches, combined, of the power to proscribe aliens whose presence with the territory of the United States was prejudicial to the good order of the nation…”

    7c35b892c948dcc157ca2fb755fa3fa7.jpg

    Passage of the 14th Amendment heralded a final spasm of outrage in the South
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine Domestic Bliss: Part Four
  • Chapter One Hundred and Forty Nine

    Domestic Bliss: Part Four


    From “The Noblest of Undertakings” by T. Peck Williams
    University of Virginia 2008


    “There was something about the overwhelming passage of the 14th Amendment that caused a final widespread boiling over of feeling in the Deep South. All the South was now in the hands of Republicans of varying stripes. The 40th Congress would see several states in the hands of Black Republicans, actual black Republicans. The loss of their natural leaders, the constitutional enshrining of the threat of proscription…it all proved too much…

    In Memphis it was the Irish, competed out of work by the newly freed negros. In Charleston it was the ragged veterans, outraged at the influx of freedmen from the countryside and indeed from Georgia and North Carolina. In New Orleans it was the wharf rats who needed little excuse for a riot in any event. In Montgomery it was protesting farmers, angered at the Bureaus of Collectors and of Freedmen preference for unionists, spinners and freedmen over rebel farmers who had lost everything to McClernand’s torches…”

    Early stage of the Charleston riot

    From "The Great Constitutional Crisis" by Dr. Lee M. King
    Carlotta 1962


    “Tensions were heightened in several states as the Federal Army used black regiments to patrol the conquered south (this was particularly true in Tennessee and North Carolina where this shocking development followed the resignation of General Wallace and reassignment of General Hancock). It was like "taking a troop of lions to guard a herd of unruly cattle" (Lew Wallace)…

    There was competition throughout the South between the military authorities, sanctioned by General Kearny alone, and the local governments (of varying degrees of legitimacy and legality) as to who was in charge. The growing power of both the Freedmen's Bureau and the avaricious Bureau of Collectors only added to the ambiguity…”

    From “The Noblest of Undertakings” by T. Peck Williams
    University of Virginia 2008


    “A degree of trouble had been anticipated. The passage of the amendment occurred during a period when large tranches of troops were finally being mustered out. Combined with the tension felt throughout the country as the papers reported day by day on the trials of Jeff Davis and Rhett large parts of the country were a powder keg of tension…

    During the four weeks following passage over 800 people were killed in incidents throughout the South. Indeed only the states of Virginia, Kentucky and Florida were spared major riots. Most local military commanders followed Israel Richardson’s example in Charleston by aggressively putting down the riots with the full force of the military available. Few however still had the resources, or for that matter the merciless attitude to casualties, that Richardson had. When Davis’ second sentence of death was handed down at the hands of the Federal Government it caused a spasm of violence among the impoverished southern veterans. They had not yet learned the lesson that the “Hammer” would not tolerate such disorder. In a single 12 hour period 18 freedmen, 3 soldiers (2 of them also negros) and 86 rioters were killed. An English observer in Charleston, Charles Pratt, noted that after the riot the city was only safe for a white man “if he was in a blue tunic”. This signalled the end of Charleston as a “white southern city”…

    In Texas A.A Humphrey had the added problem that riots resembled more of a war as Texan-Germans, unionists almost to a man who had been brutally suppressed during the war, finally took advantage of the shortage of Union troops in West Texas. The Unionist, largely German, Texan militia meated out very rough justice to rioters and protestors throughout west and central Texas…”

    From “The Radicals 1860-1872” by Hugh W. McGrath
    New England Press 2001


    “The North was horrified by this latest outbreak of violence at a time when the majority of the public at large were trying to put the war behind them. The riots blessed the radicals with new enthusiasm and converts to their cause. It was also a boon to those pushing for the maintenance of a larger regular army...

    In Texas the rioters were lucky if they fell into regular army hands. The German and Freedmen militia dealt brutally with their former oppressors.

    Congress demanded action and names provided by the local military commanders found their way to the desk of General Thomas Ewing in the Office of Proscription. It would be the first exercise of the new law against deeds committed after the war itself…

    The response to the riots amongst both northerners and enfranchised southerners alike was very heartening to Benjamin Wade. He was at the forefront of the campaign to see the transgressors proscribed. Limited attempts by President Lincoln to reduce the scope of this latest round of proscription were of limited success. Wade had the better of the fight in Congress and most expatriated former Confederates whose name made it to Ewing’s desk were proscribed without much further ado…”

    Benjamin Wade looked increasingly like a strong candidate for President in 1868 as the power of his radical faction in the Republican party grew in the wake of the 1867 riots.
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Dollars and Sense
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty


    Dollars and Sense

    From "The Cotton Economy of the Nineteenth Century" by Jude Mackinnon
    Harvard Press 1999


    “When we look at the southern economy immediately postbellum it is easy to find a number of factors which caused its persistent lethargy…”

    From "The Economic Legacy of the Civil War" by Anne Krychek
    Peck University 2013


    “The low southern income figures for the post-bellum period have been a perennial puzzle to economic historians…

    When great emphasis is placed on the slow growth of the international market for cotton one must not be mistaken about its import. In fact many economists view this as a red herring. The rate of growth of demand in the cotton market certainly declined precipitously but that is less relevant given the price increase. In fact during Lincoln’s second term the price of cotton was higher in both absolute and relative terms compared to the 1859 price…

    Rather greater emphasis must be placed on the productive efficiency of the major institutions of southern agriculture and on the effects of emancipation on the labor supply and productivity...

    Many former slaves withdrew from the labor force or reduced the hours they were prepared to work. Internal migration within the southern states saw large net reductions of the former slave populations in Virginia, North Carolina and Kentucky. There would be significant increases in South Carolina and Mississippi during this period but in many cases these former slaves eschewed further agricultural based work for urban employment…

    It should be borne in mind that agricultural income represented 80% of the total income of the five main cotton states and cotton alone accounted for about half of this share…

    The effect of the damage caused by the war itself is often disputed. It is agreed that the war caused enormous destruction, disruption and dislocation of the economy of the south. What is disputed is how persistent this effect would be. Many economists, led by Edmund Walker’s 1960s thesis, believe the economic effect of the Civil War (excluding emancipation and proscription) was negligible by 1868. Yet many other economic historians argue that emancipation, proscription and further the influence of the Bureau of Collections would persist for decades…"​

    m-10399.jpg
    White and Black sharecroppers in Mississippi

    From "The Cotton Economy of the Nineteenth Century" by Jude Mackinnon
    Harvard Press 1999


    "The south lost much agricultural expertise, particularly in the management of large scale plantations, through both proscription and through a process of voluntary immigration. The organisation that largely replaced these former plantation owners and farmers, the Bureau of Collectors, did not yet have the expertise or the mechanisms in place to maximise agricultural output in its extensive holdings. “Attorneys and Generals do not good farmers make” Jacob Dolson Cox…

    One of the short term solutions the Bureau created was the system of sharecropping. Whether or not this originated with the Bureau or was borrowed from the remaining southern landowners, it would briefly achieve widespread adoption in the South…

    The shackling of freedmen and unionist farmers to the debt trap of sharecropping led to the fragmentation of previously efficient large scale plantations. Its effect on overall agricultural productivity was disastrous. Sharecroppers had no incentive to improve output or capital to invest. It would take the intervention of John J. Peck and his Freedmen’s Bureau during the period of 1868 onwards to change this system…

    In any event the southern economy stagnated and the dominant agricultural sector did not even achieve antebellum levels of output until the late 1870s…"

    From "The Economic Legacy of the Civil War" by Anne Krychek
    Peck University 2013


    "One must not discount the drag factor on the economy of many horrifically injured and disabled veterans of the Confederate cause. Incapable in many instances of normal employment they would be burden on both their families, their communities, and in the more forgiving states like Virginia and North Carolina their states. It would take a hard fought campaign by another President to improve the lot of the southern veteran…”

    From "Committed to Community - The Life of Henry Martin Tupper" by Professor Henry Gates
    Palmetto College


    “Tupper had planned to serve as a missionary at the end of his education but instead enlisted in the Union Army. He was assigned initially to VI Corps under Isaac Rodman. In that formation he frequently served as a chaplain, ministering to the sick and injured soldiers and organising prayer meetings. It was to fill that role formally that led to his transfer to the II Division of X Corps (“the Green and Blacks”) where he became acquainted with the cause of freedmen and negro veterans that would inspire his later work…


    Henry Martin Tupper​

    Originally attracted to North Carolina to start negro literacy classes, Henry Martin Tupper [in early 1866] that many of his pupils were migrating to South Carolina. North Carolina’s expatriated population was shielded and shepherded to an unequalled degree by Winfield Scott Hancock. Thus many former slaves sought to take advantage of the land grants and leases on confiscated land in the more congenial atmosphere of South Carolina…

    Relocating to Orangeburg Tupper began teaching literacy classes to the local freedmen.In many ways this is considered to be the founding of Palmetto College. During the period 1866 to 1868 Tupper was intimately involved with the local Freedmen’s Bureau organisation. It was as a result of that association that his attention was drawn to the economic challenges and hardships experienced by freedmen and to a lesser degree by the white southern unionists during this period. It was particularly instructive that several of his pupils wished to learn to read from agricultural manuals and periodicals…”

    From "Many Are One" by Selah Merrill
    Published 1874 Reprinted by Bison 2008


    “Having completed my studies at the [New Haven Theological] Seminary I was ordained to the Lord’s service in the Congregational Church at Feedings Mills, Massachusetts. Rather than a pacific mission however my heart burned to fight, much like the shepherd in defence of his flock. I was commissioned as replacement chaplain of the 55th Massachusetts regiment then serving under General Peck with the Army of the James, often known as the Fighting Lambs. I could not have been prouder to serve against the rebel wolves in this army, this avenging sword of the Lord, alongside the men who had bled with that noble martyr David Hunter…


    Selah Merrill​

    It was by their example and those of our unionist brothers in the south that I received the revelation of the Lord’s purpose. Our strength, my friends, comes from our unity; unity of faith; unity of purpose; unity of race; unity of nationhood. As one people, that of free American men, black and white, committed to one another in life, in spirit and in blood we could defeat all foes. It was among their number that it was revealed to me that we would wipe away Secesh and its corruption like the Jews of old…

    They called it the peace. I know as you should that this was merely the continuation of war against the evil and corruption in our society by other means. I resolved to go to the heart of darkness, Charleston, to preach the Lord’s word and his purpose of the loyal southern free. I would pledge my life to that cause…

    My first task was to unite all right thinking people against the twins evils of southern democracy [a reference to the Democratic Party and former Confederates] and New York finance both of which would rob the people of their true inheritance and the hope of forming a New South…”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty One Eyes Raised To The Horizon
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty One

    Eyes Raised To The Horizon

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    "Seward was firmly in the conservative republican camp. There were still a few who believed he was the puppet master behind Lincoln’s presidency however they were but the embittered remnant of the many who had believed that at the outset of the war. Seward, still very close to the President at the outset of his second term, was a bulwark for the President’s own conservative republican views…"

    From "Seward's Follies - A Re-examination of the policies of Secretary William Seward" by Dr. John Hobson
    Harvard 2012


    "It was noticeable from early 1866 that Seward was increasingly relegated to his foreign affairs brief. His conservatism was too strong and it was painfully clear that he had lost his formally sure touch for both the feelings of Congress and the public. Indeed his muted opposition to the renewed mandate for the Freedmen’s Bureau put him at odds with the President…

    Congress frequently viewed Seward’s policy initiatives as a means of distracting the army from its on-going duty to ensure “the permanent pacification of the southern states” (Wade) and his proposed expenditure was often targeted by radicals who opposed his conservative domestic views, particular Secretary Chase (on the subject of Russian America as it then was) and William Fessenden (on the less controversial Caribbean Treaties)…"

    From "The Mexican Adventure through American Eyes" by David Hofstedder
    LUS 1996


    "Mexico was like “a stone in my boot” Seward would observe. It was a constant irritation for a variety of reasons and one Seward could do little about. The military commitment to the garrisoning of the South combined with gradual demobilization meant that while Seward continued to make grand proclamations about the inviolability of the Monroe Doctrine he had not the tools to enforce it. The President too was lukewarm about taking action against either the French or the Imperials in Mexico at first because it served as a useful dumping ground for proscribed rebels. Later, when Napoleon III declared that French objectives had been met with the establishment of the Mexican Crown and the grant of key financial concessions, the drawing down of French troops from all of Mexico save the Tampico “trading and naval” concession largely removed the primary cause of American objections…

    The position would have remained difficult for the American government were it not for the death of Benito Juarez, whom the US government had recognized as the legitimate president of Mexico. His death allowed the US government to increasingly turn a blind eye to Mexican domestic politics, particularly after Maximillian announced elections for a new Chamber of Deputies would take place in 1869. There was also of course the hugely distracting American military adventure much further afield which was infinitely more interesting to the American public…"

    map_of_the_danish_west_indies_by_regicollis-d622g5z.png

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    "Seward was an ardent expansionist, though many had been confused by his former opposition in the Senate to the Gadsden Purchase from Mexico as well as the half-hearted attempts to purchase Cuba. His opposition to those measures was based solely on his opposition to the expansion of slavery and not to any opposition to expansion of the nation itself…

    Seward, along with Secretary Welles, had been of the view that the activities of the Union Navy, particularly in the Caribbean and Mid-Atlantic, had been hampered due to the lack of overseas naval bases. There was also a reasonable argument (in that at least Secretary Chase could see a financial benefit) in the potential purchase of overseas territory in the Caribbean…

    On that basis Seward made overtures to the Danish government for the purchase of the Danish West Indies. Upon President Lincoln's recovery it was felt that Secretary Seward's absence for a time would lower tensions within cabinet. Seward availed himself of the opportunity, provided by Welles, to carry out something of an inspection tour of the Caribbean onboard a US naval warship...

    Among his ports of call was the port of St. Thomas in the Danish West Indies. Here Seward could naught but notice the large, well appointed harbor. Another stop on his itinerary was at Samana Bay in the Dominican Republic. Here Seward did more than look. He opened formal talks with the Republic's government for some interest in the bay...

    When Congress reconvened in December 1866 Seward, working surprisingly close with Thaddeus Stevens, sought an appropriation for more money to expedite the purchase of Samana. Seward's emissary for the task of concluding the negotiations he had begun was his son Frederick. The treaty negotiations with the Dominican Republic were a success only when young Seward negotiated a 199 year lease of the Bay rather than an outright purchase...

    Finally the Senate, in the dying days of Lincoln's Second Term ratified the treaty with Denmark for the purchase of its Caribbean possessions. Seward's legacy in the Caribbean owed as much to Stevens' congressional legerdemain as to his own powers of persuasion..."

    250px-1860-russian-america.jpg

    From "Edwardia - The History of Canada's Last Province" by Colonel David Pole-Carew
    Strathcona House Press 1981


    "United States Secretary of State, William H. Seward, had been an enthusiast for the whaling trade as a senator. That interest had led him to an unusual knowledge of Russian America. He had as early as 1860 rather grandiosely predicted in a speech to the Republican Party convention that Russian America would one day fall into the hands of the United States. For a man alone in the American government when it came to such enthusiasms he was remarkably determined...

    A sale of the Russian colony was rumoured as early as 1864. Seward was one of the first to hear of it and pressed the Russian ambassador to the United States, Baron Eduard de Stoeckl, to name a price. De Stoeckl indeed was advocating a sale even in 1866, fearing that the colony would inevitably fall into the hands of the Americans or the British at some point in the future without the need to remunerate the Tsar. De Stoeckl was indeed given limited discretion to open negotiations...

    Upon de Stoeckl's return to the American capitol with this news Seward was overwhelmed with the prospect of achieving his dream. It is believed that Seward offered $5 million without official government sanction. This information quickly reached the press and caused an immediate rift within the cabinet. Several were concerned with the prospect of further substantial government expenditure at a time when Secretary of the Treasury Chase was vacillating on the greenback question and the economy in the southern United States remained stalled. This at a time when Congress had just approved the expenditure for the Samana Bay lease and Seward had responded by seeking a further allocation for the purchase of the Danish West Indies. The military expenditure in the Abyssinian campaign continued to spiral also..."

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    "Chase would not countenance the expenditure under any circumstances. Seward argued the cost was negligible. The President was becoming increasingly frustrated that his cabinet meetings were becoming about an ice-bound barely inhabited Russian colony with no land border with the United States. In truth it was about the old rivalry between Chase and Seward that had flared up during the President's illness eighteen months prior and now seemed to consume both men in cabinet...

    Chase was certain the final price the Russians would seek would be higher than the $5 million Seward had already offered, without either presidential or congressional authority. Chase gambled that at a time of economic uncertainty he held more power than Seward and offered the President his resignation. With barely a year left of his tenure in office President Lincoln accepted Chase's resignation. The irony was that Chase was correct. The Russian's sought a further $1.5 million for "immovable Russian government property" in the region and thus the President avoided making Russian Alaska an issue by refusing to support the purchase prior to the election. Seward's endeavors were thwarted and Chase's hopes to ride the crest of opposition to "Seward's folly" dashed..."
     
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Two Military Odds and Sods Part I
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Two

    Military Odds and Sods
    Part I

    From "Kearny's Army - The United States Army from the Civil War to the Emperors' War"
    MacArthur University 2007


    "Humphreys would be the grateful recipient of the assistance of the West Texas Jaegers, more popularly known to history as the German Rangers, made up primarily but not exclusively of first and second generation German and Polish immigrants to Texas. The Texas Rangers had been thoroughly discredited by its actions against Unionist sympathizers during the Civil War...

    ...of course the battle in which the German Rangers and a handful of regular cavalry would bring Myles Keogh's name into the public consciousness did not occur until 1869..."

    img3.png

    A trooper of the West Texas Jaegers

    From "Kearny's Army - The United States Army from the Civil War to the Emperors' War"
    MacArthur University 2007

    "In the West the Tribes had taken the war as an opportunity to strike back at unguarded settlers. From Oregon to Minnesota there had been running fights with regulars, volunteers, militia and settlers. With the war over there seemed little likelihood the raiding and fighting would stop. The Tribes' efforts were only encouraged when it became clear the guarding of the West would play second fiddle to the garrisoning of the South...

    During the Snake River War Fitzjohn Porter had so few cavalry he resorted to training his infantry to ride in an attempt to compensate. With his Mounted Infantry Porter had the first stirrings of a force capable to striking out against the lightening raids of the Paiute, Shoshone and Bannock. He was considerably more successful than either Halleck's or Burnside's attempts to protect Northern California..."

    220px-Fitz_John_Porter.jpg

    Brigadier-General Fitzjohn Porter

    From "The Plains Wars" by Marcus Tamboro
    Burlingame 1985

    "The Dakota and Montana Territories were a powder keg. Memories of the Dakota War and the brutal execution of the 44 "unpardonable prisoners" were still fresh...

    Colonel George Stoneman had been sent by Buford to secure the Bozeman Trail. To do it Buford only had two regiments of under strength infantry to spare and a handful of engineers. Having reinforced Fort Reno, Stoneman sought to establish two additional forts farther north: Forts C.F. Smith and George Meade. Once the construction work began it was obvious what the soldiers purpose was. Realizing that they could not successfully take a fully manned fort a number of the local chiefs resolved to attack Stoneman before he could finish his work. A huge number of Lakota, Cheyenne and Arapaho had gathered as Stoneman's troops worked on Fort George Meade...

    After several days of very intermittent and ineffective sniping and raiding Stoneman's troops had a workable system for responding. However the Tribes feeble attempts had been a ruse to lure the hated soldiers into a false sense of their superiority. On 19th November Stoneman received word of an attack on the wood train. He assumed it was another minor raid. It was in fact a full scale attack led by They Fear His Horses of the Oglala Lakota. Stoneman was slow to realize the scale of the attack and fed his infantry piecemeal up the trial to assist the wood train. The reinforcements were in their turn ambushed by more warriors under the command of Hump of the Miniconjou Lakotas...

    3000 poorly armed warriors should not have been able to defeat four companies of US regulars and in one sense they did not. Instead they cut up in turn four separated companies of the 19th United States Infantry over 5 hours...
    c874385965b64d98352df5c3c4e7f355.jpg

    Stoneman dug in overnight at the site of what would eventually become Fort George Meade with about 70 men of Company D and 26 engineers, surveyors and sappers. They Fear His Horses and Hump withdrew in the night secure in the knowledge that the soldiers would likely flee come the morning. In truth as soon as Stoneman was reasonably sure the Tribes had withdrawn he and his men "lit off outta there" (Private Woodes Mitchell, 19th Infantry)...

    Though Stoneman would be cashiered from the service in disgrace for his handling of the Battle of the Bozeman (after, it is rumored, General Kearny sent an aide to present Stoneman with one of his own pistols, a single round, and a blunt suggestion) there were more immediate concerns for the army. With almost 230 soldiers killed (the worst defeat in the history of the Plains Wars) an immediate response was required. General Buford's response was swift and would become known as the Bozeman War. By the end of that war the Lakota name for Buford, Ikíčhize or War Horse, would be forever burned into the history of the Plains..."

    "The Reconstruction Era" by Michael Baylor
    Grosvenor 2006

    "While Isaac Stevens may have been a good choice for the post of commander of the military district of the Missouri, he had barely arrived in St. Louis before leaving again to join General Kearny in Europe. The stop gap appointment was William Rosecrans. Rosecrans however did not prove a politic choice. He quickly established a reputation for openly showing his contempt for both factions - Republican and Democrat. Such was the hostility towards Rosecrans that Lincoln would press for his replacement before he had held the post for 8 months. The War Office's eye fell on General Chauncey McKeever. Quiet, unassuming, yet practical and very politically savvy, McKeever was known to be extremely close to his old chief, Phil Kearny, and this alone seemed to give him sufficient authority to mediate between the factions in the district. President Lincoln would note that when faced with a raging house fire he would rather have "a cup full of Chauncey McKeever than a bucket full of water"...
    1428390969_image28.png

    Brigadier General Chauncey McKeever

    There were several other significant changes at the top of the military districts. Lew Wallace had lost patience with the competing factions in Tennessee and unlike many volunteer generals under Kearny, Wallace had lost his appetite for soldiering. He tendered his resignation from the volunteer service in early 1867, with more than one eye on running for office in his native state of Indiana. Briefly threatened with the imposition of Israel Richardson after the Memphis Riot, a relieved Tennessee received Albion P. Howe with a renewed sense of co-operation...

    Winfield S. Hancock would be relieved of his North Carolina command. It was known amongst the Cabinet that a few senior Democrats had begun to sound Hancock out about running for office in 1868. This rumors reached Hancock's own ears and he wrote to both the President and to General Kearny to confirm that, as a serving officer, he would never engage in "dishonorable politicking" and in any event both men could expected "his devotion and unquestioning loyalty". Nonetheless Hancocks' presence in North Carolina was "an itch I just had to scratch" (Secretary Seward quoting President Lincoln). The most unexpected opportunity arose to send Hancock on, what the President considered, a wild goose chase. In practice the assignment of Hancock to an exotic campaign in support of an eccentric cause would forever keep his name on the lips of the Democratic pooh-bahs..."​

    4628015718_293x389.jpg

    Bust of General Hancock from the British National Army Museum
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Two Military Odds and Sods Part II
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Two

    Military Odds and Sods
    Part II

    From "Freedmen in Kearny's Army" from an article by Paul Bernouli
    North & South Magazine 2006

    “In the years immediately following the Civil War the Academy returned to admitting cadets from former Confederate states. Obviously these could only be non-expatriated or re-naturalised persons. Unsurprisingly, given the revised electoral make up of many of these states, the first African American cadet was admitted in 1868 from South Carolina. Cadets from Mississippi and Louisiana would follow in 1869 and 1871. By 1888 twelve African Americans had graduated of 26 admissions. West Point would be at the forefront if integrated education and it would have a profound effect on its future alumni...”

    220px-Henry_O._Flipper.jpg

    From "Kearny's Army - The United States Army from the Civil War to the Emperors' War"
    MacArthur University 2007

    “Under the guidance of the new superintendent, William B. Hazen, the focus of the Academy’s curriculum would shift from engineering to strategy, tactics and logistics. Kearny advocated for superintendents from outside the Engineering branch of the army…

    Kearny had a very mixed view of the abilities of the West Point alumni during the late war. He had very specific views that the army and the nation should not be running a free school for civil engineers which is what many graduates quickly left the army to pursue…

    He was keen that the “fighting experiences of the army should be imparted to the cadets”. In this he was fully supported by John F. Reynolds, the former Commandant of Cadets. “The challenges of the late war must become the lessons of the classroom”…

    Reform saw control of the Academy pass from the Corps of Engineers to the Office of the Commanding General...”

    From "West Point Recollections" by Major James Danby ret.
    MacArthur University 1991

    “One of Kearny’s innovations was the involvement of the final year cadets in his annual army exercises…

    We had been placed under the command of a final year classman by the name of Daniel Richardson. He had the field rank of major for the purpose of the exercise…

    He ordered the company to dismount and had us crawl through the dirt like damn infantryman. His objective was to flank two companies of the 9th Infantry and he wanted us to use a not particularly deep sunken road to do it. Being captain in both fact and for the purpose of the exercise I questioned the wisdom of using cavalrymen thus. The impudent whelp threatened to horsewhip me if I questioned his orders again, and I’m only half sure he didn’t mean it. Well we flanked the 9th and rolled them up like a blanket according to the umpires of the army staff. The cadet was Bull Richardson’s son and the regiment would have followed him to hell...” (recollections of Major, and later General, Adna Chaffee 14th cavalry of the 1887 army exercises)...”

    220px-AdnaChaffee.jpg

    General Adna R. Chaffee
    From "The Fenian Movement in America" by James McGillycuddy
    Grosvenor 2008

    “With a membership now well versed in the use of arms in the late war, the Fenians sought to capitalize on this experience with a plan for the invasion of Canada from multiple points within the United States. They hoped their raids would encourage the United States to follow with regular troops in order to establish the St.Lawrence River as its northern border or even to annex the whole of Canada...

    The United States government’s interest in the annexation of Canada was ephemeral. There was no appetite for fresh military conflict outside of Benjamin Butler’s congressional office. However matters were not helped nor official United States government policy clarified when William Seward commented in conversation with leading New York Fenians that the government would “acknowledge accomplished facts”. Seward must have felt some sense of the danger in which he had placed the government because he promptly raised the matter of a possible Fenian attack on Canada at cabinet…

    This all went too far for President Lincoln. Although courting Irish votes in the midterms, Lincoln was resolutely against turning a blind eye to the Fenians. “I will allow no private citizen nor private army to use American sovereign soil to wage war upon a friendly power...even less to embroil this nation in another life and death struggle”…

    The OMI [Office of Military Intelligence under General Charles P. Stone] quickly identified those regular and militia officers offering support to the invasion. Indeed there was very little secrecy about the endeavour. The OMI was also able to assist in the seizure of large stockpiles of arms and several vessels were also impounded…

    The Fenian invasion plan was laughably naive and doomed to failure had not the United States government intervened to save them from themselves. The plan had been formed without much regard for Canadian history or the contemporary political scene and was based on completely false assumptions about Canadian loyalty and United States government policy…

    After the congressional elections of 1866 it became clear that the Fenians no longer had the influence to direct Irish votes en mass and thus were no longer able to exert significant influence over American politicians.

    The wild rumours about the plot to invade Canada were widely circulated and given much credence in Canadian political circles. The theoretical risk of a Fenian/American invasion probably did more to unite the Canadian peoples than the laughable reality of an actual Fenian invasion could ever have done…

    Plagued by factional infighting, financial woes, police and army informers, and opposition from the Catholic Church the Fenians faded away as a meaningful organisation in North America within 10 years...”

    728026153.jpg

    Canadian Confederation was partially a response to the wild rumours of invasion from the United States that dominated the press in 1866 and 1867
    From "The Road to Perdition - the Life of Daniel Sickles" by Jeff Gambley
    New York 1997

    Had anyone other than Philip Kearny been the general officer commanding the armies of the United States, Dan Sickles’ military career would have ended years earlier. Instead Sickles was first military governor of and then general officer commanding in Louisiana…


    During his tenure Louisiana experienced the first waves of interstate migration of African Americans into the state from Texas, Arkansas and points further north on the Mississippi River. The outflow of potentially troublesome white ‘incorrigibles’ and an influx of black unionist freedmen made Louisiana one of the more peaceful states of the south to govern – at least outside the Bayou. Nonetheless Sickles managed to generate more than his fair share of trouble in the state...

    It was several months before the Bureau of Collectors was properly established in the state. In that time Sickles had, using his broad discretion as military governor, confiscated Confederate State property as well as property owned by senior Confederate government and military figures. Several of these real estate properties turned out to be ‘excess to military requirements’ and were subsequently sold off to various unionists.

    sickles_dan_loc2_med.jpg

    The ever controversial Daniel Sickles

    Unsurprisingly there was ample scope for abuse of this system and rumours of backhanders, under the table incentives and poor accounting of the most dubious sort abounded. Sickles and several senior officers in the state were repeatedly accused of profiting significantly from these confiscation sales. Ironically the first charges were brought by a long standing Louisiana state attorney who Sickles promptly had expatriated and his real property confiscated. Many of the chief complainants were expatriated persons as thus their words were given little weight by the Unionist dominated press or army. All this was further confused by the lack of clarity around the legality of the military’s power following the defeat of the Confederacy but before the Federal recognition of the reconstituted state governments of the south…

    Of all the various charges thrown at Sickles, only one came close to sticking. The mansion in Baton Rouge in which Sickles had his headquarters had been confiscated from an expatriated Confederate congressman now in Cuba. It had been judged unnecessary and sold to a consortium of ‘Northern investors’ before Sickles relocated his command there. The Northern investors were found to consist mostly of Union officers in the state who were now receiving rent from the Federal government. It came as no surprise that this consortium had paid nothing like the market price for the property…

    It was the Bureau of Collectors who pressed the investigation as they initially sought to claim the property themselves before identifying the new owners. James Wilmer, an Ohioan and chief agent of the Bureau in Louisiana, thought he was close to uncovering a conspiracy to defraud the government and Sickles retention of Ben Butler as his own counsel seemed to reinforce that impression…

    However though the investigation would identify two majors (both Pennsylvania Democrats), one in Sickles headquarters and one in the state Office of Proscription, as the prime movers of the fraud no links to Dan Sickles could be proved…

    Sickles would never forget how the power of the Bureau of Collectors had been brought to bear against him. In 1868 he lobbied the new president hard to replace the Bureau chief, Jacob D. Cox, with Sickles himself. In the end though, while Sickles remained still the President’s most particular friend, the President knew he had the best man for the post already in the office and Cox remained in place…

    Retirement from uniform was not entirely unrewarded that year. Sickles was elected as Captain-General of the New York Legion. It was never clear if he realized the importance of the post at the time. The new president would also not forget him and Sickles was offered a prized position abroad...”


    From "War and Politics: The career of John A. McClernand" by Alfonso M. Mitchell
    Rushbridge Press 1983

    "It was during the year of 1868 when McClernand was lobbying hard to become Captain-General of the Illinois Legion. He had the foresight to see the power of the veterans organisation in Illinois politics and he intended to use it as a stepping stone to some higher office. Privately McClernand seemed unfussy about whether that office was the governorship or a seat in the senate...

    antietam.png

    Former President Lincoln and Captain-General McClernand at an 'encampment' celebration held by the Illinois Legion

    His rival for the role was an old comrade from the armies of the west, Stephen A. Hurlbut. Hurlbut was running on a ticket with David R. Clendenin for Legion State Treasurer. It was too good an opportunity for McClernand to miss...

    The Chicago Daily Journal published a story confirming how each of the military judges in the Jefferson Davis murder trial had voted in private. It was most unfortunate that, of the two judges from Illinois, David R. Clendenin voted to acquit while John A. McClernand voted to convict. A furious scandal erupted as it had only been vaguely rumoured in army circles that any of the judges had voted to acquit and now it was known that as many as three had...

    5805141_1060553768_large.jpg

    David Ramsey Clendenin

    Hurlbut sank with Clendenin anchored around his neck and McClernand was elected to the Captaincy-General almost by acclamation. The role would propel McClernand all the way to Washington, while the scandal would come close to wrecking the military careers of Adelbert Ames and William B. Hazen. For the immediate future however the scandal and its obvious source meant that McClernand would remain out of favour with the incoming president and his administration..."
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Three Military Odds and Sods Part III
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Three

    Military Odds and Sods

    Part III
    From "The Plains Wars" by Marcus Tamboro
    Burlingame 1985


    “Buford's War (also referred to as the Bozeman Trail War or the War Horse Campaign) followed the Stoneman debacle. It would see the United States Army once again square off against the Lakota, Northern Cheyenne, and Northern Arapaho, this time in both the Dakota and Montana territories. The war was fought over control of the western Powder River Country – effectively the lands watered by the rivers that flowed north east from the Big Horn Mountains. This land had traditionally been Crow tribal land, but the Lakota had recently driven them out. The Crow tribe held the treaty rights to the disputed area, according to the major agreement reached at Fort Laramie in 1851 and this was to be a significant factor in Buford’s campaigns…

    The success of the attack on Stoneman’s command emboldened the Lakota and their allies. Small scale raids and attacks on soldiers and civilians increased. The War Office concluded that decisive action had to be taken...”
    107867

    Brigadier General J.N.O Buford​

    From "Kearny's Army - The United States Army from the Civil War to the Emperors' War"
    MacArthur University 2007


    “E.O.C. Ord, commanding the Department of the Plains, developed a rather plodding campaign plan. Using infantry regiments near at hand he planned to sweep the Powder and Tongue Rivers in two grand marches north east from the Bozeman trail during what was left of the summer and during the fall. John Reynolds, polite and understated as always, simply described it as “an artilleryman’s plan”

    The Plains Sub-Department commander, J.N.O Buford, was asked for his opinion in direct correspondence from Philip Kearny. Buford proposed pulling together the 5th Cavalry from its various detached garrisons in the Dakota Territory, and adding several available companies of the 10th and 13th Cavalry. Colonels John Wynn Davidson of the 10th and Eugene A. Carr of the 13th would both be in command even though their full regiments were not available. The 5th would be commanded by Buford’s old comrade Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Devin, who had signed on from volunteer service to the regulars at the pressing of both Buford and Kearny…

    Buford’s objective was to strike against the Lakota alliance while they were at their most vulnerable: when in winter camps. They Fear His Horses, Hump, Crazy Horse and their followers were known to be on the Powder, Tongue, and Rosebud rivers. Buford's force would consist of almost 1,300 men which, aside from the main cavalry force, would include some infantry, civilian packers, and a the odd supernumerary newspaper reporter. One key element of Buford’s plan was the use of the 13th Cavalry. Carr’s initial recruits had been from the Indian Territory but was still short on numbers. Buford proposed encouraging Crow, Pawnee and Omaha recruits. Only a handful of Pawnee and Omaha joined and most of these were army scouts in any event. However at the urging of Wolf Bow many Crow warriors would join the 13th forming company H...

    On receipt of Buford’s plan Kearny simply appended the word “THIS” with his signature and sent it on to E.O.C Ord to set the wheels in motion. Time favoured Buford as winter was still almost three months off...”

    1563182e7f3adb72332e826e95998ce9-jpg.341660

    From "The Plains Wars" by Marcus Tamboro
    Burlingame 1985


    “Buford's opponents, the nomadic hunting and warrior societies of the Lakota Sioux, Northern Cheyenne, and Arapaho, had advantages in mobility, horsemanship, knowledge of the country, guerrilla tactics, and the capability to concentrate their forces to achieve numerical superiority. They also had many weaknesses as a fighting force, especially in organization and weapons…

    During the winter the scarcity of natural resources resulted in the tribes living in small, scattered autonomous groups. In late summer and fall they congregated into large encampments for ceremonies, to make political decisions and to plan collective action. Bands were highly decentralized and individual tribesmen often felt little obligation to obey group decisions. The Lakota consisted of seven independent bands, each made up of numerous sub-bands, all of whom operated independently. The Cheyenne had a more structured and centralized political organization...

    Some historians have estimated that the warriors in the Powder River area numbered up to 4,000 men. The total number of Lakota was estimated to be about 14,000. The Northern Cheyenne and Arapaho numbered about 3,000, adding up to a total of about 17,000 Indian men, women, and children, but thousands of the people in all three of those tribes were not in the Powder River country. Many others stayed aloof from the on-going strife fearing retribution…

    As had been typical of United States militias, tribal warriors were part-time warriors. They had to spend much of the summer and fall each year hunting buffalo and other game to feed their families. In the late winter and spring, they were limited in mobility until the grass turned green and their horses could recover their strength after the severe winters of the northern Great Plains. The effectiveness of Indian forces were diminished by their lack of cohesion and organization…”

    custer-advancing-on-the-cheyenne-in-a-snowstorm-5877499.jpg

    Buford's plan for a winter campaign was a brave one

    From "A Soldier’s Life" – the Biography of J.N.O. Buford by James W. Pelham
    Buffalo 2001


    “Snow had fallen the day before Buford and his command left Fort Reno. The troops marched north on the Bozeman Trail toward the Powder River. This column, the larger of the two, included 14 full companies of cavalry, 80 wagons pulled by mules, six ambulances filled with forage and a pack train consisting of five divisions of 80 mules each. The newly raised Crow company of the 13th accompanied Buford well…

    Sword in the Bear was the unofficial ‘company sergeant’ of Company H under Captain George Wynstra, primarily as he was considered the fiercest warrior. However he was also an exceptional tracker and knew the country well. He and Hump had raided one another in the past and he had an unerring sense of where Hump’s camp could be found…

    Buford and his men attacked the Miniconjou camp of Hump on the Powder River in what is now southern Montana. Carr recalled that the village “was bountifully provided with all that a tribesman could desire, and much besides that a white man would not disdain to class among the comforts of life.”…

    The village was situated under some bluffs, and the Miniconjou gained the higher ground from which they drove Buford’s force back. The undisciplined nature of the newly recruited tribesmen was largely responsible. Buford was not deterred and while Carr kept the hostiles fixed on the bluffs, Buford personally led three companies of the 5th on to their flank and up an unguarded defilade…

    The defeat of Hump’s band heartened the troops who, though suffering from the bitter cold, also had an ample supply of meat and furs thanks to Buford’s preparations. From there they marched north west toward the mouth of the Rosebud river…

    Carr observed “the long line of mounted men, white, black and red, stretched for more than a mile like a river of color against the somberness of the white snow.” The wagons formed “an undulating streak of white that seemed to merge with the color of both snow and clouds”.

    To Buford’s surprise the first force they encountered was 16 Shoshone warriors, dispatched by their chief, Washakie, to help the army fight their old enemies, the Lakota. That was only part of the story. Washakie had also tasked them with observing how the warriors who had joined the ‘long knives’ were treated. A far sighted chief, he wished to know whether the Shoshone warriors should be encouraged to join or not…

    According to Carr, Buford said of his objective, “We don’t want to kill the Indians, we only want to make them behave themselves.” His Crows had found three camps along the Rosebud in close proximity guarding two large pony herds. This was an opportunity to strike a crippling blow…

    The soldiers struck at dawn; they found a narrow entry through the natural shelter of bluffs and ridges and bountiful cottonwoods and willows that provided protection to the village along the creek such that two companies of the 10th were able to deploy to charge.

    Forty Lakota died in that first charge, as the rest scrambled for the bluffs. Buford’s troops burned their tipis while taking possession of their clothing and winter food supplies. As the temperature plunged Buford sent out a proposal to the beleaguered Lakota: surrender your arms and agree to be taken to Fort C.S. Smith and the army would provide food, furs and warmth. The Lakota refused and the temperature that night fell to thirty below zero. Two men, four women and nine babies froze to death that night the Lakota confirmed when they surrendered the next day. While giving no outward sign, Carr believed Buford stricken by their count of the dead. The men of the 13th believed it their “just fate” (Sword in the Bear). The Shoshone warriors reported back to Washakie that War Horse (Buford) was a great war chief but he was generous to his enemies to the point of foolishness...”

    Buford’s victories at the Battles of Hump’s Camp and the Rosebud, along with Wynn Davidson’s successes along the Bighorn River, as well as the loss of several pony herds would cripple a large proportion of the Ogalala, Hunkpapa and Miniconjou warbands for many seasons to come...”

    220px-Washakie.jpg

    Chief Washakie would come to see the 13th Cavalry as a lifeline for the Shoshone
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Four Into Africa
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Four

    Into Africa

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “The Anglo-American Expedition to Abyssinia was prompted by no thirst for glory, by no lust for conquest. Unwillingly entered upon for the sake of humanity by the Governments of England and the United States, it was vigorously carried through in the same cause by the officers to whom its conduct was entrusted. Its success was great. There was no territorial aggrandisement. Yet it did not pass unrewarded, for its result was greatly to raise both the English and American armies in European estimations…

    The troops were not only liberators of their countrymen, but were explorers in an unknown land. The theatre of our operations was little better understood than when it was supposed to be the seat of empire of the mythical Prestor John. The cloud of mystery which enveloped this African Switzerland, the uncertainty of adventure, and the confidence felt by all ranks in their chosen commanders, lured many volunteers to seek service in the enterprise. Apart from the army there was no desire for the expedition...”

    T%C3%A9wodros_II_-_2.jpg

    Theodore II or Tewodros II​

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “Lij Kassa was born in Kouara, the western province of Abyssinia about the year 1818. His father was of noble family, and his uncle Dejatch [chief] Comfu was the governor of the provinces of Dembea, Kouara and Tschelga…

    In 1852 Kassa signally overthrew and killed Dejatch Goshu, one of Ras Ali’s best generals. The Ras now took strenuous measures to oppose Kassa’s rise…

    Kassa marched to Godjam and defeated the troops of Ras Ali and Oobye. By this victory the whole possessions of Ras Ali fell into Kassa’s hands…

    In February 1855 Oobye, the governor of Tigre, his most formidable antagonist was overthrown. In March of the same year Kassa took the title Theodore II…

    Following Consul Plowden’s death, Captain Cameron was appointed Consul in Abyssinia. In February 1862 he arrived at Massawah, and in July at Gondar. He was received with great honour and treated with every respect. When he arrived there were a great many Europeans around Theodore. Six Germans who had been sent out as scripture readers: Flad, Waldmaier, Saalmuller, Kenzlin, Mayer and Bender. They had little time for missionary work as Theodore employed them in the manufacture of munitions of war. There were also three missionaries – Staiger, Brandius and Rosenthal who’s wife accompanied him. They were soon joined by Mr and Mrs Stern. There were also some adventurers around Theodore’s camp – three Frenchmen: Bardel, Bourgaud the armourer, and Maberer the soldier; a Pole named Hall; and two German chasseurs formerly in the service of the Duke of Saxe-Coburg...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “Cameron’s mission was increasingly misinterpreted by Theodore, and he assumed the English were intriguing with his enemy, the Turk, and threw Cameron into prison. This occurred in 1863. With the passage of time matters went from bad to worse, and with an exchange of correspondence and parleys too tedious to recount, finally all the Europeans in the country, including the missionaries were made prisoners. There they were subject to all the tortures the barbarian mind could conjure...”

    custer-portrait.jpg

    Colonel George A. Custer

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “It was into this powder keg that the Reverend Hezekiah H. Hunter of the African-American Missionary Society arrived in late 1866. Reverend Hunter concluded, on the briefest of experiences of Abyssinia, that he could intercede on the prisoners' behalf where the European envoys had failed. As an American and thus of neutral standing, and indeed as a fellow negro, he believed himself the ideal emissary to Theodore. A little faith is a dangerous thing and Reverend Hunter failed to accountant for several factors which would govern Theodore’s increasingly irrational thinking...

    Theodore’s views on race were rather more nuanced that Reverend Hunter’s and it is clear he viewed a black envoy as an insult to his status…

    Rumours that the Turk was employing Americans had reached the ears of the Abyssinian Court. That Theodore did not distinguish between Union men and Confederate exiles could come as no surprise…

    Finally President Lincoln had, in Theodore’s eyes, committed the same sin as Queen Victoria. He had not replied in a timely and respectful fashion to Theodore’s diplomatic correspondence and thus had insulted Theodore personally…

    Thus Hunter found himself chained in Magdala with the Europeans. Worse, as he was in Abyssinian eyes African, he was subject to worse tortures and indignities than his fellow prisoners...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “The Government, supported by the public opinion, was loath to thrust an expedition into a distant land, shrouded in mystery, where danger alone was certain. The army however writhed beneath the insult which a British envoy had received at the hands of an African savage. They spoke loudly their opinions and these acted as a stimulus on such part of public opinion which yet did not despair of the prowess of the nation’s arms. The band which advocated the rescue of the captives by force gained in numbers and brought its weight to bear upon the Government…

    It appears that, towards the middle of April 1867, the Government first began to contemplate seriously the possibility of an expedition to Abyssinia. With the view of such an eventual necessity, the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, in whose department the management of the Abyssinian difficultly had hitherto lain, officially invited the attention of the Secretary of War and of the Secretary of India to the subject. In June the Government sought information as to the possibilities of an expedition into the country of Theodore...”

    Victorian-Cartoons-Punch-1867-08-10-57.jpg

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “As soon as the idea of a possible invasion of Abyssinia was conceived by the ministers of England, it was natural that they should look around to see what other affected nations might rise to share the burden. France, preoccupied with Mexico and the rising difficulties in the Germanies, dismissed England’s invitation. America’s response, which England’s ministers no doubt thought mere proforma, would reverberate around the corridors of Whitehall and Horse Guards for months to come...”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Five A Nation United in Foolishness
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Five

    A Nation United in Foolishness

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “Had Russell’s diplomatic cable, communicated directly to Secretary Seward by Lord Lyons, been the only notification of British intentions in Abyssinia then perhaps the involvement of the United States would never have advanced beyond purely moral support. However preparations for the expedition were widely reported in the press and privately detailed to a number of leading Americans by their British correspondents, among them Philip Kearny and John Watts de Peyster…

    Earlier historians of this period of ‘American Adventurism’ put the pressure brought to bear by the army at the feet of General Kearny. It is much more likely that it was de Peyster influencing Kearny to support his policy, for that is what the Abyssinia Expedition represented – the earliest expression of de Peyster’s ‘Military Policy’. The expedition could be used as a solution to certain domestic embarrassments while increasing the influence of the United States on a global stage...”

    "The Reconstruction Era" by Michael Baylor
    Grosvenor 2006


    “The Nation had, at the prompting of Reverend Crummell, taken up the cause of Hezekiah H. Hunter. That his predicament would gain the attention of the old abolitionist and new negro press was not surprising. What changed the nature of the story was what happened when the national press began reporting on Hunter…

    1-firstissue1865_copy-jpg.357001

    The Nation, successor of William Lloyd Garrison's "The Liberator".

    John J. Peck, Oliver O. Howard and Isaac P. Rodman were at the forefront of calls for action to ensure the safe release of Hunter, a veteran of Peck’s Fighting Lambs. Peck tapped into a great seam of national guilt when he wrote “the nation has allowed one Hunter to be martyred for our sins. Let not another be martyred because of our neglect” (a letter from Peck to Frederick Douglass published in part first in The Nation). He of course referred to the national hero General David Hunter, executed during the Civil War by Confederates because of his support for emancipation and the arming of former slaves…

    Yet it was not the Republican press that lobbied hardest for military action. To the continued surprise of many it was the Democratic press who rattled their sabres hardest. Scores of headlines and editorials declared Theodore’s actions an insult to national prestige. “The petty despot of Abyssinia needs to be taught the consequences of thumbing his nose at the American people” thundered Wilbur F. Storey of the Chicago Times “just as the Barbary Pirates were in the time of our fathers”…

    fullsize

    Wilbur F. Storey of the Chicago Times and perennial opponent of President Lincoln

    The louder the Democratic press cried insult, the deeper they buried their former equivocation on American patriotism. Many considered it a cheap remedy to the national suspicion of Democratic loyalty. “It is not as though Lincoln and Seward will waste one cent to recover a negro preacher from the bowels of Africa” as Marcus Pomeroy of the La Crosse Democrat privately noted to a friend. For those more optimistic that action might be taken "every soldier not in the South is one fewer soldier I have to fear" as John Chilton of Savannah Gazette observed when commenting on the constant fear many southerners had of denunciation, followed by de-naturalisation or expatriation. The cries from the Democratic press were so loud John Sedgwick observed "every spinner in Virginia is in favor of the army punishing the one negro they can all publicly hate, Theodore of Abyssinia"..."

    From "Seward's Follies - A Re-examination of the policies of Secretary William Seward" by Dr. John Hobson
    Harvard 2012


    “In the face of pressure from left and right Seward found himself helpless. It was not as though there was an Abyssinian ambassador or consul with whom he could lodge a protest or open negotiations. Britain, with all its interests and experience in the region, itself had no diplomatic options. “What prey do you scribblers expect the government to do?” (Seward to his friend, retired newspaper editor Thurlow Weed)...”

    From “The Rivals – Lincoln and his Cabinet” by Amelia Doggett
    Grosvenor 2008


    “The future policies of John Watts de Peyster ought not to be a subject of this work except that in the final years of the Lincoln administration they were already bleeding into the national debate. Kearny’s memorandum to Lincoln and Stanton on “the consideration of a military contribution to the British Expedition currently planned for Abyssinia” was neither solicited nor initially welcomed. Yet in it were the seeds of its success. The proposition that General Winfield Scott Hancock command any expedition would remove a potential political embarrassment from North Carolina (and Democratic speculation about his potential presidential candidacy) while placing one of the nation’s finest soldiers in a role well suited to his abilities. It had de Peyster’s fingerprints and indeed he was fervently in favour of the military/diplomatic adventure and said so loudly and often within his New York circle (at least according to the memoirs of his friend Robert B. Roosevelt, then National Unionist candidate for congress)…

    General_de_Peyster.jpg

    John Watts de Peyster
    A critical figure in the development of US foreign and military policy in the second half of the 19th Century

    With pressure from both flanks of the press and Congress, Lincoln began to discuss military action in cabinet seriously. Stanton was pessimistic. Troops, he said, were badly needed to police the South, Indian Country, and the Mexican border. The army did still have ample stocks of war material but he was seriously concerned about the War Office’s ability to supply any troops in Abyssinia. Welles thought the whole concept a “colossal waste of time and money...surely Teddy (as a large portion of the American press had taken to calling Emperor Theodore) would kill all his captives at the first hint of an invasion”. He could easily ship a few thousand troops as far as Alexandria or the Sinai, but private means would have to be found to get them to Annesly Bay via the Red Sea. On the subject of supply he was clear – American agents would have to compete with the British ‘in theatre’ to secure supplies of food and forage where necessary. Seward, barely taking the discussion seriously (at least as far as Holt later observed), believed American consuls in Egypt and India could be trusted to act as agents to secure such supplies as were necessary if the funds were supplied.

    holt.jpg

    Vice President Joseph Holt
    Unlike Hannibal Hamblin before him, he regularly attended cabinet

    McCullough was horrified that the discussion was even taking place. Though only in office a few weeks at this point he had inherited Chase’s pessimism about the state of the nation’s finances if caution and restraint were not exercised. No one, not even Kearny, seemed able to estimate the likely cost of such an expedition and no one had any idea of the cost of the basic supplies any force would need to secure whether in Egypt, Arabia or India. Holt thought McCulloch need not worry as disease would kill most soldiers in a few weeks and the rest would disappear in the African wilderness never to be heard from again. That said, Holt declared that any such expedition would be, at least initially, hugely popular and unusually placate both Radicals and Democrats…

    Gentlemen,” Lincoln observed “the Radicals want it; the Democrats want it; the Freedmen want it; the Press want it; the Army wants it; and the nation’s clergy want it. Can I, can any government, afford to disappoint so many people?”

    Well if it succeeds it will unite the country” observed Seward “and if it fails it will likely be someone else’s problem by then”…

    Thus Seward was authorised to open discussions with the British Government, via Lord Lyons, to discuss the dispatch of a small force, no more than brigade strength, to support the proposed campaign in Abyssinia. Seward had however secured from the President permission to impose a number of preconditions to American involvement. Specifically any nation involved (France had not yet demurred) would not seek territorial concessions from the Abyssinian peoples nor would any financial indemnity be imposed unless the prisoners were killed. As far as Seward was concerned it was still by no means clear that a force would be sent, yet he had not realised that the wheels had inexorably been set in motion...”

    en-lord-lyons-1869.jpg

    Little did the British minister to the United States, Lord Lyons, expect to receive a positive, albeit conditional, response to the invitation to join any Abyssinian military expedition
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Six An Expensive Affair
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Six

    An Expensive Affair
    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991

    "There has never been a colonial campaign quite like the Anglo-American expedition to Abyssinia in 1868. It proceeds from first to last with the decorum and heavy inevitability of a Victorian state banquet, complete with ponderous speeches at the end. And yet it was a fearsome undertaking; for hundreds of years the country had never been invaded, and the savage nature of the terrain alone was enough to promote failure...

    The task was given to the Bombay Army, and Lieutenant-General Sir Robert Napier, was given command of the expeditionary force. This was a very unusual decision as it was the first time a campaign had been entrusted to an officer from the Corps of Royal Engineers, though it would not be the last. It was also a very sensible decision, as the whole campaign would rely on engineering skills to succeed.

    The American contingent was commanded by Major-General Winfield Scott Hancock of Civil War fame. While his appointment may have had political motivations there was no question he was an exceptional soldier and leader of men. Crucially he had also spent much of his peacetime service in the post of Quartermaster. If Napier’s skill in engineering would get the army to its destination, Hancock’s would see it arrive well fed and watered...”

    hh1k2.jpg

    American standards of dress on the campaign did not always meet with British approval

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885

    “Encamped at Norfolk, awaiting our transports, we had all the appearance of a motley crew for we were the odds and ends of the army that could quickly be gathered upon the East Coast in any state for dispatch to Africa. Hancock the Superb, who had commanded a Corps in the War, was reduced to the command of a brigade. Only one of three regiments of infantry assembled had their colonel available, the venerable Robert Buchanan had the Old Guard, the 3rd Infantry. The 10th was commanded by Charles R. Woods and the 17th by Cleveland Winslow, both Lieutenant Colonels. Indeed Winslow, though a hero of the war, had been naught but a militiaman before it…

    The cavalry I was to have was also a mixed command, with regiments parceled out in handfuls around the nation, no one regiment could be quickly mustered for service. I was to have one company of the 1st, two of the 7th under the able Major Merritt, and one of the 13th under Captain O.W. Gambell. E Company of the 13th was to prove something of a novelty to our English comrades and a terror to their sepoys. The Delaware, Shawnee and Choctaws would revel in their celebrity...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870

    "It having been wisely noted that the sepoys of Bombay object less to the crossing of oceans than those of Bengal or Madras they were assigned the lion’s share of the task ahead…

    The necessary preparations were legion. As Abyssinia has no seaboard the Foreign Office had obtained permission for disembarkation on Egyptian soil. As no coinage was current in Abyssinia except the Maria Theresa silver thaler of Austria, British influence had set the machinery of the mint at Vienna in motion. As water could be expected in short supply condensers were ordered to the Egyptian coast to supply the troops and animals on shore. The animals themselves were a menagerie dispatched from all corners of the Mediterranean and Near East. Forty-six of the finest trained elephants were to be sent from India to carry the heavy guns on the march, while hiring commissions were dispatched to obtain mules and camels to handle the lighter gear. A railway, complete with locomotives and some twenty miles of track, was to be laid across the coastal plain, and at the landing place large piers, lighthouses and warehouses were to be built. Thus did General Napier sow the seeds of victory before he had set a foot on an African shore...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885

    "To the majority of the civilized world looking on, the expedition seemed foolish and chimerical. The press drew ghastly pictures of the malaria of the coast and the insalubrity of the country. I was appalled to discover the insurance offices had raised their rates mercilessly to the officers volunteering for the service, who were regarded as rushing blindfold into suicide…

    The one bright spot was that Hancock the Superb raced to request my service before Kearny the Magnificent could recommend me. It was deeply gratifying to be remembered by two such soldiers for my service in the war. Though a Colonel was too high a post for a mere wing of cavalry, I did not stand on rank but was happy to serve this great endeavor…

    I was overjoyed upon arriving at the General’s headquarters in Norfolk to find such old friends gathered again in Hancock’s service: Captain Charles Hale Mason, long serving chief of staff to General Hancock; Captain William Galbraith Mitchell whose knowledge of civilian engineering would see him transferred to act as our liaison with General Napier; Captain Isaac Verplanck van Antwerp, whose name was of such amusement to the English officers; and Lieutenant Charles Henry Hoyt, who had led a seemingly charmed life as Hancock’s aide-de-camp..."

    9310576_125184432526.jpg
    Charles_Hale_Morgan.jpg
    brevet-general-va.jpg

    Captains William Galbraith Mitchell, Charles Hale Morgan, and Isaac Verplanck van Antwerp had all previously served as staff officers to General Hancock

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991

    "The force consisted of 13,000 British and Indian soldiers, 3,100 American soldiers, 27,000 camp followers and over 48,000 animals, including elephants. The British force set sail from Bombay in upwards of 280 steam and sailing ships. The advance guard of engineers landed at Zula on the Red Sea, about 30 miles south of Massawa, and began to construct a port in mid-October 1867. By the end of the first month they had completed a pier, 700 yards long. They completed a second one by the first week of December and the railway was already reaching into the interior, with 8 iron girder bridges being built...

    At the same time a reconnoitering party, under Colonel Sir William Lockyer Merewether, had pushed up the dry bed of the Kumayli River to the Suru Pass, where again the engineers were busy at work building a road to Senafe. It would be no mean feat of engineering being 63 miles long, rising to 7,400 feet (2,300m) and designed to serve the elephants, gun carriages, and carts…

    The demand for water was enormous, the Zoola camp using 200 tons a day, which was created using condensation from steamship boilers in the harbor. As the force moved inland, wells had to be dug...

    From Senafe, Merewether sent out three letters: one from Lord Stanley, one from General Napier and one from Secretary Seward. All demanded the release of the hostages. These were sent by Mr Rassam by whom they were destroyed for the effects they might have upon Theodore’s temper…"

    upload_2018-2-19_23-5-34.jpeg

    American hired transports join Royal navy ships in the Gulf of Zula

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870

    “Much to the surprise of all assembled the promised Americans did indeed begin to arrive, having landed at Alexandria, entrained to Suez, and embarked on privately hired transports of all kinds for Annesley Bay. As the first ships carrying the esteemed General Hancock and his staff arrived a missive was dispatched from headquarters to be heralded throughout the lands by which the army must march:

    To the Governors, the Chiefs, the Religious Orders, and the People of Abyssinia.

    It is known that Theodorus, King of Abyssinia, detains in captivity the British Consul Cameron, the British Envoy Rassam, the American Missionary Hunter, and may others, in violation of the laws of all civilised nations.

    All friendly persuasion having failed to obtain their release, my Sovereign has commanded me to lead an army to liberate them. We are joined in this by our American friends who have likewise been enjoined by their President.

    All who befriend the prisoners or assist in their liberation shall be well rewarded, but those who may injure them shall be severely punished.

    When the time shall arrive for the march of an army through your country, bear in mind, People of Abyssinia, that the Queen of England and President of America have no unfriendly feelings towards you, and no design against your country or your liberty.

    Your Religious establishments, your persons, and property shall be carefully protected.

    All supplies required for my soldiers shall be paid for.

    No peaceable inhabitant shall be molested.

    The sole object for which British and American forces have been sent to Abyssinia is the liberation of our fellow countrymen.

    There is no intention to occupy permanently any portion of the Abyssinian Territory, or to interfere with the government of the county.

    R.Napier, Lieut-General.

    Commander in Chief, Bombay Army

    October 1867"

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991

    "It is largely to the credit of American influence that this new tone was struck in colonial warfare. It terms were remarkable for the era and heralded the intent of the President that General Hancock should "keep the English honest".
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Seven A Tourist in the Heart of Darkness
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Seven

    A Tourist in the Heart of Darkness

    campabyssiniaimages8.jpg

    The combined encampment at Senafe
    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “From the forward encampment at Senafe the view was magnificent. The country was rugged and broken by jagged masses of rock which raised their jagged edges, topped with acacia and juniper trees, above the scanty vegetation of the intervening ravines. In the glare of midday this prospect looked hot and thirsty, but in the first glimmerings of the early dawn or when the quickly setting tropic sun had swept down behind the distant hills it was magnificently grand...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “At Senafe, which lay some 7,000 feet above the level of the sea, as soon as the sun went down the heat ceased. Warm clothing and heavy blankets were immediately required for the nights were very cold. The great variation in temperature, of necessity, caused an increase in what it was least desirable to increase – baggage...”

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “From the outset General Hancock was beset with difficulties of supply. On top of the initial failure to provide cold weather clothing, which Hancock had not overlooked, but which had gone astray somewhere between Norfolk and Alexandria, an epidemic broke out which attacked the horses in the low ground. Both British and American forces were required to quickly push their healthy horses up into the highlands. Having already had to purchase one set of remounts the American treasury was now faced with an almost entirely duplicate expense as another officer had to be sent to Egypt to purchase remounts. Furthermore it quickly became apparent that further transport animals were required if any American forces were to partake in the full march to Magdala. This led to the rather interesting development that one American counsel undertook to forward camels from Arabia to assist General Hancock...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “The transport, and consequently baggage was reduced to the smallest possible dimensions. Officers vied with each other in discarding any article which could be spared for all thirsted to facilitate the advance of the army. I fancy we Americans trumped the British in our ability to march frugally…

    Unlike the infantry, who remained exclusively under the command of General Hancock as an independent American brigade, I was brigaded with British regiments. Initially we camped with the Scinde Horse [5th Bombay Cavalry] to which the 3rd Dragoon Guards was later added…

    Their red-men and our red-men were exceedingly curious about one another. The 13th seemed most impressed by the beards of the Scinde troopers and referred to them often as the ‘Okchamoli nutakhitch’ [sic] or green beards as the Scinde troopers wore green rather then the expected British red. It is without any apparent irony that they were later to refer to the red tunic’d Dragoon Guards as the ‘red-men’…

    It was with no ill-felling that I was informed that an accord had been reached with the British on the subject of seniority. To avoid the embarrassment of almost every British officer being outranked by American lieutenants with brevet colonelcies and majors with brigadier-generalcies it was agreed that only substantive ranks would apply. This meant that Colonel Tower [3rd Dragoon Guards] had command of our brigade but as a veteran of Balaklava and the Charge of the Heavy Brigade I was delighted to serve under his command...”

    3dgabyssinia.jpg

    3rd Dragoons Guards in Abyssinia

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “It speaks of General Hancock’s knowledge of his subordinate that he ensured he himself informed Colonel Custer of the accord with General Napier. The accord denied Custer command of the combined cavalry brigade. Had the news been delivered by a staff officer or in a written order in the normal course there would likely have been the most terrible scene. As it was Custer used language to General Hancock during their private interview that Lieutenant Charles Hoyt described (much later in life) as extremely “impolitic”...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “Some not present argued that the force that General Napier judged to be necessary and for which he waited too large. They forgot that a line of communication 400 miles in length had to be held open between Magdala and Zulla, with a chain of fortified posts established to cover the stores and depots along it.

    They also omitted from consideration that although the natives appeared friendly as long as the expedition was successful and had power, the slightest reverse would convert them all into enemies. That among the Donakill tribes of the mountains the taking of a human life is the sole proof of manhood and the sole passport to marriage, and the uncertain Prince Kassai of Tigre hung upon our right flank with 10,000 at Adowa...

    Major Grant, an officer of the intelligence department, was delegated upon an embassy to Prince Kassai at Adowa to convince this Prince of Tigre to let his people open up the markets for the supply of our army. Indeed with out the co-operation of the local peoples on the question of supply the column would have been further encumbered with baggage…

    It must be borne in mind that while meat could be obtained and the wood used to cook it could be found scattered over the mountain sides, meat alone in that climate would not suffice for the food of man. Its use as a sole article of food quickly brought on dysentery and scurvy. Vegetables, tea, sugar, spirits and, at the instance of the Americans, coffee had ever to be in the rear of the army...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “8 miles from Senafe was Gooma-gooma. On the northern side of the valley, perched on an almost inaccessible ledge of rock, was situated a church, in which were located some curious paintings and illustrated copies of the Scriptures. For the first time I was truly sensible of marching into a largely Christian country which made Abyssinia seem less like the savage heart of Africa...

    campabyssiniaimages13.jpg

    The church at Goona-goona (the British and Americans differ on its name)

    I had the pleasure to attend, with General Hancock, the notable visit of the Prince of Tigre to our joint encampment at Senafe. Upon the arrival of the Prince General Napier mounted one of the two Indian elephants that the British had brought to camp. It was with some reservations that General Hancock was induced to mount the second. General Napier used elephants on such occasions as the Abyssinians fear these animals much and have never attempted to tame any of them. I cannot say I blame them much. The first man to do so must have been a regular Phil Kearny...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “The passage of the elephants through the valley was followed by crowds of wandering and awestruck Abyssinians and no few Americans agog in wonder...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “Kassai was a young man of 35 years of age. His face, of a dark olive colour, was intellectual, but bore a careworn and wearied expression which justified the statement of the intelligence officers that he did not desire power, but that it was thrust upon him by the nobles of Tigre. He wore the Abyssinian costume, a white robe embroidered with crimson, round his body and a flowered silk shirt which marks those in high office here. His dark black hair was arranged in careful plaits which, drawn back from the forehead, were tied by a piece of riband round the back of the neck…

    The conversation at first consisted of almost meaningless enquiries after mutual health. Then the prince threw out hints for presents of firearms. These were adroitly fenced and the conversation turned to the subject of our mutual Christianity. In this subject neither the prince nor his followers took nearly so much interest as in that of firearms…

    Port wine was brought in and served to all at General Napier’s request. According to Abyssinian custom General Napier had to drink some to prove that it was not poison – not an unnecessary precaution considering that it had been obtained from British hospital stores because of the reduction in baggage...”

    hs7thcalvalrycuster.jpg

    Custer's account of the Campaign in Abyssinia was a best seller and would be reworked into his autobiography

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “Kassai was very anxious that the British should undertake to guarantee his dominions against his rival, the Wagshum Gobazee. General Napier unhesitatingly refused but the question of Briitsh guns, supplies and support would give much cause for regrets later...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “On our return visit to Prince Kassai’s camp I concluded his men were not warriors to be despised. At Adowa Kassai had some 6,000 well armed men. Their discipline was good and they showed a power of manoeuvring which would not have disgraced the forces of a civilised nation. Their serious error, I noted, was that at night no sentries or pickets were posted outside their camp. Thus arose their vulnerability to defeat by Theodore who did love an assault at night…

    After much had been eaten in the great princely tent, girls entered bearing huge bullock horns filled with ‘tedj’ a drink made from fermented honey. It was expected that each guest should bow towards the Prince and empty his flask. Although bowing does not come naturally to any true born son of Columbia, General Hancock followed the diplomatic example of General Napier and I followed that of my chief. No sooner had I done so than my flagon was seized by this watchful native daughter of Eve and again replenished. We each had to drink to the Prince several times…

    Musicians were introduced – a band of men playing on long pipes which uttered wild but not unpleasant music. A war song was then sung by a minstrel and all Abyssinians joined in the chorus. Several officers, both British and American, reciprocated with several verses of “Garryowen” well known to the soldiers of both armies. Several officers enjoyed the hospitality of these fine people after the generals had withdrawn...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “Having secured the tacit co-operation of the Prince of Tigre we then marched on to Antalo where Brigadier General Collings was left with a not insignificant garrison amounting to almost a brigade of all arms…

    We then marched forth towards Ashongi and into the country of the Wagshum Gobazee…”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “The villages in the vicinity of Ashongi are perched on high conical rocks and surrounded by fences to defend them from the attackes of the Azebo Gallas, who live not far off under their terrible Queens. They are professors of the Mohammedan faith and are bound by the laws of their tribe to kill a Christian before they take a wife. Bloodshed is common in this country and some stragglers from the army suffered at the hands of the Gallas until I directed some troopers of the 13th Cavalry under Captain Gambell to put an end to it...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “As we neared the Bashilo river and Theodore’s domain all precautions were taken against a night attack of which Theodore was so fond. It was well known that he had many spies and as we neared the Wadela plateau several horsemen were seen, who could easily be recognised to be scouts. They were too astute to allow themselves to be captured by our cavalry…

    The picquets and vedettes were nightly posted by Colonel Fraser VC Of the 11th Hussars in his role as Commandant of Outposts. In this role he was ably assisted by Major Merritt KC of the 7th United States Cavalry. These were frequently and minutely inspected…

    Mashesha, the uncle of the Wagshum Gobazee, paid a visit to General Napier with about 200 of his followers and when concluded he was escorted by an officer beyond the outposts of the 1st Brigade. On his way to a neighbouring village he used a road which led close past the outposts of the Combined Cavalry Brigade, where a corporal and 4 men of the 1st United States Cavalry were stationed. This picquet was totally unaware that the body of Abyssinian cavalry had come from the camp of the 1st Brigade and warned the horsemen not to approach. These horsemen replied with shouts of derision and brandishing of their lances.

    The corporal, presuming them to be of Theodore’s cavalry, ordered his party to fire and shot was returned. The remainder of the picquets then fired and advanced against the natives causing some loss of life. At the sound of the shots the troops were stood to their arms, but it was soon discovered the affair rose from a mistake…

    Mr Munzinger of the political department was despatched to Mashesha’s camp to explain the matter and offer a pecuniary compensation to the relatives of the killed which was readily accepted...”

    campabyssiniaimages31.jpg

    The scene of the unfortunate events between the 1st Cavalry and the Wagshum Gobazee's cavalry

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “I can only commend the actions of the picquet who acted correctly and in accordance with standing orders and the practices of war. I highlighted in my report then, as I do now, the magnificent conduct and spirit of the cavalry in advancing against a much superior force…

    It was of course outrageous for the payment of monies to be agreed by the British without consultation and the embarrassment General Hancock suffered when the British sought to charge our own treasury for the settlement is a matter of public record...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “Magdala was now but a few short days’ march away...”
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Eight Springfields, Enfields and Battlefields
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Eight

    Springfields, Enfields and Battlefields

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “On 7th April General Napier despatched by native messenger, to King Theodore, a formal demand for the immediate and unconditional surrender of the prisoners, couched in these but moderate terms: “By command of the Queen of England, and with the full approbation of the President of the United States of America, I am approaching Magdala with my army in order to recover from your hands Envoy Rassam, Counsel Cameron, Reverend Hunter, Doctor Blanc, Lieutenant Prideaux and the other Europeans [sic] now in your Majesty’s power. I request your Majesty to send them to my camp as soon as it is sufficiently near to admit their coming in safety”. No response was received...”

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “While the force waited on the Dalanta plateau, scaling ladders were prepared from the poles of the native doolies, and sandbags were filled. The weather was broken; rain and thunder showers were a nightly occurrence. Much to the irritation of the Americans the British seemed to take these nightly storms as a good omen. The Americans were not aware that many great British victories had been preceded by a deluge…

    This was not the only point of contention between the respective commands before the final advance. General Napier sought to make arrangements to cut off Theodore’s retreat from Magdala, in case he might attempt to flee and carry off the prisoners. The Dejatch Mashesha to the east and Masteeat, Queen of the Gallas, to the south, were both induced to close any avenues from Magdala. General Hancock took exception to these proceedings couched as they were in terms of the outrages Theodore, as a putative Christian King, had perpetrated against these Muslim communities. Napier would not relent but issued his diplomatic overtures only in his name and that of his Queen...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “On the far side of the Bashilo river lay a rugged broken ground, in the centre of which the Amba of Magdala rose to an almost equal height with the plateau of Dalanta. The rugged country, studded with a bushy vegetation, was bounded in the distance by the tablelands of Tanta and of Ambula Sieda…

    The mountain mass of Magdala forms a crescent, of which Magdala is the Eastern horn, Fahla the western end, and in the centre the plateau of Selassie. The highest of these of Magdala which rises to a height of over 9000ft above the sea, and of 3000ft above the ravines...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “The arbitrary nature of this cruel king was fully on display the night before battle. Though he released several great native prisoners of note he then, in the depth of night, had hundreds more put to death – many by his own hand...”

    campabyssiniaimages51.jpg

    Brigadier-General Schneider and staff

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “General Napier had descended into the bed of the Bashilo, and reconnoitred the crossing of the river which was a muddy stream. Magdala lay twelve miles beyond the Bashilo; hence it was necessary, in order to make a closer reconnaissance of the fortress, to advance a force beyond the river…

    At daybreak the advance was commenced and the whole army, with the exception of some cavalry, was moved down to the Bashilo…

    As the only supply of water between the Bashilo and Magdala was under the enemy’s fire all the water carriers of the force were organised under the command of Captain Bainbridge, for the purpose of carrying forward regular supplies of water from the river. The bandsmen and a party of the Punjab muleteers were also organised, under command of Captain Griffith, and were furnished with stretchers for the removal of wounded men from the field…

    All preparations having been completed, the 3rd Bombay Light Cavalry, 3rd Sind Horse and 12th Bengal Cavalry were placed to hold the Bashilo, but were kept in readiness to advance. The 2nd Brigade under Brigadier General Wilby was ordered to remain in the bed of the Bashilo in support; while the infantry of the 1st Brigade under Brigadier General Schneider was to occupy the Gumbaji spur, advance to a position suitable for an encampment, and at the same time cover a reconnaissance to be made by General Hancock in the direction of Fahla. A road would have to be prepared by the Sappers and Miners before guns, rockets and baggage could follow the 1st and American brigades…

    The troops toiled painfully and slowly up the rugged slopes of the Gumbaji spur. They suffered severely from the difficult nature of the path, great heat and want of water, and many fell out of the ranks exhausted by fatigue...”

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “Had Hancock’s message to Schneider been written in French, or even in Latin, confusion would no doubt have been avoided. However the two brigade commanders remained divided by a common language. Schneider received Hancock’s notorious written message (penned by Captain Mason of Hancock’s staff) confirming he had pushed towards Fahla but had not secured the ‘draw’ and expected Schneider to detail the troops to do so. Schneider had no idea what a ‘draw’ was. In British military parlance it would have been called a ‘re-entrant’ and it referred to the point where the King’s road emerged from the Warki-Waha draw/re-entrant. The key to the Anglo-American position remained unsecured...”

    napier_2936181a.jpg

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “It was Sir Robert Napier himself, arriving on the plateau, who noticed this key point which ought to have been the first secured unguarded. It was the hinge between British and American forces and also led to the artery by which the General meant to bring up the artillery and baggage. He was not however the first to notice. Theodore had seen the error first. As the General ordered forward the Sappers and Miners from their road building to repair the error, the steep path and the mountain sides of Fahla were instantaneously covered by masses of warriors, quickly rushing down…

    A few moments after they came in view, a puff of white smoke curled up from the summit of Fahla, and a roundshot whirred towards the staff and General Napier had his first experience of having a horse shot from under him…

    Among the Abyssinians, who number not less than 5000, the principal chiefs, about 500 in number, were mounted and gorgeously attired in scarlet…

    The Naval Brigade, under Captain Tyron, hastened up the road to the Afficho plateau, and as each rocket-tube came into position, it opened on the advancing masses of the enemy, who were startled and slightly checked but advanced nevertheless with great confidence…

    General Napier directed Brigadier General Hancock to prepare troops to receive the enemy charging from the Fahla. Hancock caused his troops to lay down their packs and to advance…

    The 17th United States Infantry, in skirmish order, under Lieutenant Colonel Winslow, closely followed and supported by the marines of the Naval Brigade under Captain Tyron, a detachment of Royal Engineers under Major Pritchard, and 3 companies of the Sappers under Captain Taylor, marched from the Afficho plateau into the dip of ground separating it from the Arogi plain. As the 17th emerged from this dip, and rose upon the brow of the Arogi plain, they came close upon the advancing masses of Abyssinians who had descended from Fahla. They opened fire immediately, and the bullets, shot in rapid succession from their Springfield breech-loaders, told with fearful effect upon their assailants…

    The Abyssinians driven back, sought to rally...the volume of American fire was telling...the Abyssinians were driven from the plain of Arogi...”

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    “We could hear the increasing volume of fire from above but no order came to advance. I suggested to Colonel Tower that to advance to the sound of the guns was never a bad policy but Colonel Tower was scrupulous in his adherence to orders regardless of the rapid course of events on the battlefield…

    While General Schneider was fully engaged in securing the King’s road, a large party of the enemy attempted to pass around the sides of the Afficho Plateau to turn our right of line. They were unmoved by the brief discharge of rockets from the Naval Brigade’s artillery position on the heights. An attack was called for…

    The ground over which the Abyssinians moved did not lend itself to mounted repulse, but recalling my experience on the field of Gettysburg, I offered to lead the American forces as dismounted dragoons. My offer accepted and a wing of the Dragoon Guards attached for good measure I placed myself at the head of the advancing forces with Old Glory at our head and the Union flag not far in arrears...”

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    “Despite contemporary American reports, George Custer’s written contributions, and more than a few film that have mythologised events there is not a single British account that does not have Colonel Towers at the head of the advancing dismounted cavalry that saw off the flanking force of Abyssinians…

    Had there been one brigade the matter might have been sorely contested, but with both the American and Anglo-Indian brigades deployed and quickly into action the Abyssinians stood no real chance. It appears that they never succeeded in closing with any element of the allied forces deployed. Indeed they suffered a great slaughter at the hands of Hancock and Schneider or perhaps better yet at the hands of Springfield and Enfield...”

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    “The allied troops, thoroughly tired, bivouacked for the night on the ground upon which the battle had been fought...”

    e59787053dfdea8dccd40970fbb83144--vintage-photographs-vintage-photos.jpg

    United States Cavalry Officer pictured on the Fahla
     
    Last edited:
    Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Nine The Long Road Home
  • Chapter One Hundred and Fifty Nine

    The Long Road Home

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    "Chaos reigned in the Abyssinian camp when the full extent of the defeat became clear. No chief seemed left alive to take command. The body of the Emperor, broken by allied artillery, but identified by Mr Saalmuller, one of the European prisoners, was treated reverently by the American forces who first came upon it. The message from the advancing allies was clear – “His Majesty, Emperor Theodore has fought nobly and bravely fallen in his cause. It is my desire there be no more blood spilled. If therefore the people of this country bring all the Europeans [sic] now in their hands and deliver them safely this day to the British camp I guarantee honourable treatment to the Abyssinian people and most particularly to the Emperor’s family” (General Napier’s declaration).

    C617B1.jpg

    British newspapers wrongly credited the discovery of Theodore's body to their own troops

    Aside from the artisans liberated by the Americans from Theodore’s armed camp, where they had been forced to assist with his artillery, the remaining Europeans were delivered into the British camp alongside Theodore’s queen, Tirrowark and his son, Alumayou. The Queen and the Prince were taken into our care with the intention of travelling to England. No doubt the Queen feared for her young son’s life as her dead husband’s rivals would now vie for the throne…

    The fortress of Magdala was in the territory of the Muslim Oromo tribes. Two rival Oromo queens, Mostiat and Werkiat, who had both allied themselves with the allies claimed dominion over the captured fortress as their reward. The strong opinion of the allies was that Magdala should be handed over the Christian Wagshum Gobazee. This would allow Gobazee to stem the Oromos’ advance and perhaps save some 30,000 refugees from Theodore’s camp. Gobazee, keen to seize Theodore’s cannons, responded positively and, having given undertakings for the safety of the refugees, took possession much to the anger of the Oromo queens…"

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    "The column began to retrace its steps to the coast. While, to the eyes of the British and Americans themselves, the force was an imposing spectacle, with its flags and bands playing, the troops were soon to learn they had earned little gratitude in Abyssinia. They were simply seen as another warlike tribe on the march…

    Indeed to many of the native Abyssinians it looked as if the Anglo-American troops were marching away as though defeated at Magdala. As such attacks on the column, though rare on the march inland, increased. This was exacerbated in the early stages of the march as the Oromo queens, in the full fury of their wroth, gave licence to their subjects to revenge themselves on their ungrateful former allies…"

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    "At the time of the battle before Magdala every station along the supply route was being pressed by the natives. Frankly the whole border population, whether Mahommedan or Christian, could not resist the sight and temptation of property. Several bodies of armed men hung upon the line between Senafe and Adigerat, and more than one convoy was molested. The detachment at Goona-goona had to turn out to repel an attack by an armed party. The increase of such molestations was of increasing concern to the Commander in Chief…"

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    "The column was shielded by the combined cavalry brigade which performed this arduous and tiring duty gallantly. No straggler from the column was safe and occasionally larger parties would be the subject of determined attack...

    On the first stage of the journey it was the savage Oromo serving their twin Witch-Queens; further on it was then the brutal Gallas once again. Although we had occasion to engage in larger actions, such as the repulse of an Oromo attack in force on the Water Party, where I had the privilege to lead troopers of the 1st and 13th in a mounted action which repelled the attack without significant loss, such actions were rare. We were instead often subject to harassing fire from musketoons, bows, spears and simple rocks hurled from concealed positions. Driving off such attacks proved a tiring and unsatisfying exercise for the troops…"

    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    "It is difficult to underestimate the strain placed on the officers and men of the cavalry of both nations and the success they achieved in protecting the main body of the column from harassment. The tragedy at Senafe can be put down to a failure of communication between the staff of both the British and American commands, as well as a break down in the cavalry’s chain of command…"

    From "Son of the Morning Star" by George A. Custer
    Harper and Bros. 1885


    "Near Senafe, where both our nations had formed significant camps of supply, Major Merritt, commanding the troops protecting our own supplies, reported to me that a large body of armed Abyssinians was moving on the camp. I immediately gave orders that Colonel Towers and General Hancock be informed and further that my intention to form the cavalry under my command and move upon the tribesmen forthwith be communicated….

    Major Merritt commanded two companies on my left and Captain Gambell two on my right. My force was entirely made up of American troops. The Abyssinians numbered perhaps 5,000 men while my own command on that morning mustered no more than 220 mounted troopers…

    The vedettes firing over their heads did not dissuade the advancing horde and, in the absence of further orders, I resolved to protect our supplies by immediately charging the enemy force…"

    b5d2b601bb83db8ca9e20e55672c4536.jpg


    From “America in Abyssinia – a reassessment” by Dr. Luther K. Price
    Buffalo 1991


    "Custer’s Charge or the Battle of Senafe created a legend that it has taken a century to unravel. The successful charge of white, black and red Americans against seemingly huge odds was celebrated in America as a pivotal unifying event. Though it took weeks for the news to reach American shores reports, overall wildly inaccurate, dominated the papers for weeks. As a solely American victory it seemed to dwarf the victory at Magdala in the American public’s imagination. Sword and revolver in the melee would be the staple of seven major theatrical film releases. It served Custer’s fame for a generation…

    Napier had sought to reward Ras Kassai for his services with a formidable quantity of supplies, muskets, rifles, cannons and ammunition. These were exclusively British supplies and ordinance and so the Americans were not informed in any great detail about the transaction. Neither were the tribesmen sent by Kassai informed of the difference between British and American supplies. Was Custer then right to defend the US supply encampment? Hancock thought so, referring to the tribesmen as “an undisciplined horde bent on looting the property of the United States Government”. Privately he wrote “the British government may tolerate General Napier’s largesse. They can certainly afford it. Our government expects me to account for every biscuit and every horse blanket. I have no regrets about the chastisement those savages received at Custer’s hands”…

    The British, keen to avoid their own embarrassment, were quick to blame Ras Kassai. “Having whetted their appetite with legitimately obtained goods, greed drove them to attempt to wholesale looting and thievery from the next camp which they came upon”…

    The full background of the engagement at Senafe would remain largely hidden until the early 20th century…

    Oblivious to the shambles behind the misunderstanding the press was universal in its praise. The Abyssinian campaign finally had an American hero: a golden-haired cavalier from Michigan. It helped that this hero was beloved by his commanding general, Phil Kearny, and already the implement of American vengeance: the slayer of John Wilkes Booth…

    The smashing of his unprepared men and the resulting loss of prestige and support were the first nails in Ras Kassai’s coffin. Within two years he would be dead, and his troops scattered at the hands of Wagshum Gobazee – Emperor Giyorgis – George of Abyssinia…"

    On the return to Zula the captives released from Theodore’s power, who belonged to other nationalities, were finally released over to the foreign officers who awaited them there. The plunder taken at Magdala was sold at auction, and the proceeds of sale distributed among the troops as prized money (an undertaking shared with the Americans much to the concern of some elements of Congress). Indeed General Hancock’s staff secured one of Theodore’s two crowns for presentation to the United States Government in some form of compensation for the expenses of the expedition. Though it was a highly ornate and, according to Hancock, “rather barbaric” headgear it was only silver-gilt with coloured glass decorations. The British had secured the primary golden Emperor’s crown…

    From “An Account of the Recent Campaign in Abyssinia” by Captain J.F. Goodfellow
    Macmillan & Co 1870


    "Perhaps General Napier should have the last word:

    Soldiers and Sailors of the Army of Abyssinia! The Queen of England, the President of America and our two great peoples entrusted you a very arduous and difficult expedition – to release our countrymen from a long and painful captivity, and to vindicate the honour of our countries, which had been outraged by Theodore, Emperor of Abyssinia.

    I congratulate you, with all my heart, on the noble way in which you have fulfilled the commands laid upon us…

    Our complete and rapid success is due – firstly, to the mercy of God, whose Hand, I feel assured, has been over us in a just cause; secondly, to the high spirit with which you have been inspired!

    Soldiers have forgotten the prejudices of race and creed to keep pace with one another in this endeavour…

    Though the remembrance of your privations will pass away quickly; your gallant exploits will live in history on three continents. I shall remain to watch over your safety to the moment of your re-embarkation, and shall, to the end of my life, remember with pride that I have commanded you.
    ” (Extract from General Sir Robert Napier's Final General Order of the Campaign).
     
    Top