Telford 2 Court Martial
Newcastle 1912 - a soldier's tale

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE in the case of No. 877 Corpl. John Forster Telford
24th. Northumberland Fusiliers.
1st. Witness:-
Lt C.E.F. Mathews, 2nd Dragoons, states:-
On the afternoon of the 12th. inst, I was in charge of a troop of 30 men posted in aid of the civil power on the Newcastle Town Moor. At the same time a section of men from the Northumberland Fusiliers Territorial Force in charge of the accused were posted to my right. At about 3.00 p.m. I observed a party of police officers armed with batons attempting to force their way through the crowd towards the speaker. These officers were very roughly handled by the crowd. At this point the crowd turned towards the Fusiliers and began jeering and hooting. Almost immediately the men began to waver and fall back, the accused among them. As the crowd advanced the Fusiliers turned and ran, some dropping their weapons. I observed the accused among them. He made no attempt to rally or remonstrate with the men in his charge.​
(signature) C.E.F. Mathews, Lt.

(handwritten) The accused declines to cross [examine] this Witness.​
(signature)
K R Balfour Maj. Presdt. F Ellis Capt. G Bracken Capt


Findings of the Court
It is the unanimous finding of the court that the accused is guilty under Section 40 of the Army Act 1881 of acting to the prejudice of good order and military discipline.
Sentence
The accused is sentenced to be reduced to the ranks, to two years hard labour and to be discharged with dishonour from His Majesty's Armed Forces.
 
Bibliography

The sources I'm using are always available in the bibliography fromn Dropbox as per my sig. However it's grown a lot since I last published it here, so here's an update.

100 years since the 1911 Railway Strike, Alex Gordon, RMT news August 2011 http://bristol.indymedia.org.uk/article/705569 (accessed 18/02/21012)
Anarcho-Syndicalism, Rudolf Rocker (6th Edn), AK Press, 2004
Art in Revolution: Liverpool 1911 revisited, Blog post, 2011, http://gerryco23.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/art-in-revolution-1911-revisited/ (accessed 16/02/2012)
At war with the Bolsheviks, The allied intervention into Russia 1917-1920, Robert Jackson, Tom Stacey, 1972
Battle of George Square, Wikipedia, [FONT=FreeSerif, serif]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_George_Square[/FONT][FONT=FreeSerif, serif] (accessed 11/02/2013)[/FONT]
Black & Tans and Auxiliaries in Ireland, 1920-1921:their origins, roles and legacy, John Ainsworth, [FONT=Times-Roman, Times New Roman, serif]Annual Conference of the Queensland History Teachers’ Association, 2001[/FONT]
Bonar Law, Henry Brighouse, http://crookedtimber.org/2009/12/10/bonar-law/, (accessed 18/02/2012)
British Fascism 1918-39, Thomas Linehan, Manchester University Press, 2000
Building the Union: Studies on the growth of the worker's movement Merseyside 1756-1967, Harold R Hikins (ed), Toulouse Press, 1973
Catholic History of Liverpool, Thomas Burke, 1910 http://archive.org/stream/catholichistoryo00burkuoft#page/n5/mode/2up (accessed 15/02/2013)
Charlotte Despard, Spartacus Educational, http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Wdespard.htm (accessed 01/03/2012)
Civilian Soldier 1914-1919, George Harbottle, Self published, 1981
Cwmardy, Lewis Jones, Parthian Books; Library of Wales Edn, 2006
Defence of the Realm Act 1914, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_of_the_Realm_Act_1914 )accessed 10/03/2014)
Defence of the Realm Manual (6th Edn), HMSO, 1918, http://www.archive.org/details/realmdefense00grearich (accessed 11/02/2012)
Defence of the Realm Manual,1918, https://ia600407.us.archive.org/20/items/defenceofrealmma00grearich/defenceofrealmma00grearich.pdf (accessed 10/03/2014)
Domestic Deployment of the Armed Forces :Military Powers, Law and Human Rights, Michael Head & Scott Mann, Ashgate, 2009
Election '45, Austin Mitchell, Fabian Society, 1995
Emergency Powers Act 1920, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Powers_Act_1920 (accessed 10/03/2014)
Featherstone Massacre - 7th September 1893, Wakefield Library Service, http://www.wakefield.gov.uk/CultureAndLeisure/HistoricWakefield/FeatherstoneMassacre/default.htm, (accessed 17/02/2012)
Featherstone Massacre, http://treeworship.blogspot.com/2011/01/featherstone.html, (accessed 17/02/2012)
Forgotten Revolution - The Limerick Soviet 1919, Liam Cahill, 1990, http://www.limericksoviet.com/Book.html (accessed 17/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 1: Introduction, 'Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-1.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 2: Why people feared Civil War, 'Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-2-why-people.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 3: Government Policy on Reacting to Strikes and Riots, 'Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-3-government.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 4:Action in South Wales, 'Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-4-action-in.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 5: Hull, 'Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-5-hull.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 6: The Liverpool General Strike, 'Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-6-liverpool.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest 1910-1911 Part 7: Consequences of the Unrest, Rooksmoor', http://rooksmoor.blogspot.com/2008/11/great-unrest-1910-11-part-7.html (accessed 22/02/2012)
Great Unrest and a Welsh Town, Tim Evans, International Socialism 131, http://www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=744&issue=131 (accessed 15/02/2012)
Green Flag: a history of Irish Nationalism, Robert Kee, Penguin, 2000
Hay Plan & Conscription In Ireland During WW1, Dave Hennessey, Waterford County Museum, http://www.waterfordcountymuseum.org/exhibit/web/Display/article/192/1/?lang=en (accessed 18/02/2012)
Hooligans or Rebels? An oral history of working class childhood and youth 1889-1939, Stephen Humphries, Blackwell, 1995 (2nd Edn)
Industrial Problems and Disputes, George R Askwith (Baron Askwith), John Murray, 1920
Ireland and the Federal Solution: The debate over the United Kingdom Constitution, 1870-1921, John Kendle, McGill-Queen's University Press, 1989
Irish Civil War, Edward Purdon, Mercier Press, 2000
Irish Soviets in the War of Independence/Civil War, Thread on livinghistory.ie, http://www.livinghistory.ie/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=571&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=Irish+Soviets (accessed 17/02/2012)
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jallianwala_Bagh_massacre (accessed 17/02/2012)
Jesuits and their strategy to destroy Britain, , Lecture at the Fourth EIPS Seminar, http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=jesuits (accessed 15/02/2013)
Limerick Soviet, Liam Cahill, http://www.limericksoviet.com/Book.html (accessed 04/03/2012)
Limerick Soviet, Limerick City Council, http://www.limerickcity.ie/Library/LocalStudies/LocalStudiesFiles/L/LimerickSoviet/ (accessed 17/02/2012)
Limerick Soviet,Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limerick_Soviet (accessed 11/02/2013)
Liverpool 1911 – Jack's Story, Tony Mulhearn, Socialist Party website, http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/12566 (accessed 18/02/2012)
Liverpool General Transport Strike 1911, 'Alex', http://libcom.org/history/1911-liverpool-general-transport-strike (accessed 18/02/2012)
Liverpool Transport Strike of 1911, William Jones, Mike Royden's Local History Pages, http://www.btinternet.com/~m.royden/mrlhp/students/transportstrike/transportstrike.htm, (accessed 16/02/2012)
Llanelli 1911, Tim Evans, blog post, 2011, http://londonsocialisthistorians.blogspot.com/2011/05/llanelli-1911-by-tim-evans.html (accessed 15/02/212)
Llanelli August 1911, Llanelli Pwyllgor Streic Web site, http://1911llanellirailwaystrike.org.uk/ (accessed 15/02/2012)
Llanelli's Forgotten Riot, Neil Prior, BBC News, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-14529442 (accessed 16/02/2012)
Local Parliaments For England, Times [London, England] 13 Sept. 1912: 4. The Times Digital Archive. (paid service but may be available through UK library) http://find.galegroup.com/ttda/info...261&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0 (accessed 10/03/2014)
Manual of Military Law 1907, https://archive.org/download/manualofmilitary00greauoft/manualofmilitary00greauoft.pdf (accessed 10/03/2014)
MI6: The History of the Secret Intelligence Service 1909-1949, Keith Jeffrey, Bloomsbury, 2011 (pb edn)
Military Correspondence of Field Marshal Sir Henry Wilson, 1918-1922,KeithJeffery, The Bodley Head, 1985.
Military Intervention in Britain, Anthony Babington, Routledge, 1991
Modern Ireland, Senia Paseta, Oxford University Press, 2003
Mutiny, Tom Wintringham, Stanley Nott, 1936
Natural Divisions of England, C. B. Fawcett , The Geographical Journal , Vol. 49, No. 2 (Feb., 1917), pp. 124-135, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1779341 (accessed 10/03/2014)
[FONT=FreeSerif, serif]Near to Revolution: Liverpool and the 1911 General Transport Strike[/FONT][FONT=FreeSerif, serif], Sam Davies & Ron Noon, North West TUC, 2011[/FONT]http://www.tuc.org.uk/extras/1911generaltransportstrike.doc[FONT=FreeSerif, serif] (accessed 18/02/2012)[/FONT]
New Soldiers Handbook, Georges Yvetot, Paris 1903 http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/66t21j (accessed 24/06/2010)
Northern Ireland, Marc Mulholland, Oxford University Press, 2002
Occupied France, Collaboration and resistance 1940-1944, H R Kedward, Blackwell, 1985
Political Police in Britain, Tony Bunyan, Julian Friedmann, 1967
Qualification of Women Act 1918, Spartacus Educational, http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/W1918.htm (accessed 01/03/2012)
Rail Riots 1911 , Thread on uk.railways, http://groups.google.com/group/uk.railway/msg/3c3e338f6826433c?hl=en (accessed 18/02/2012)
Restoration of Order in Ireland Act 1920, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_of_Order_in_Ireland_Act_1920 (accessed 10/03/2014)
Revolt of the Bottom Dogs: History of the Trade Union Movement Limerick City and County 1916-1921 Part 1, Martha Dickinson, et al, Limerick Labour History Research Group, 1988
Revolt of the Bottom Dogs: History of the Trade Union Movement Limerick City and County 1916-1921 Part 2, Martha Dickinson, et al, Limerick Labour History Research Group, 1988
Revolution And War; Or, Britain's Peril And Her Secret Foes. "Vigilant," (Mary Francis Cusack), New and rev. ed. London: S. Paul & Co., 1913. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b297182 (accessed 15/02/2013)
Short history of British Anarcho-syndicalism, Solidarity Foundation, 2006 http://www.solfed.org.uk/a-short-history-of-british-anarcho-syndicalism (accessed 23/06/2010)
St Francis Xavier Church, Liverpool, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Saint_Francis_Xavier,_Liverpool (accessed 15/02/2013)
St Francis Xavier, Liverpool, A History of the Parish Johnny Kennedy, 2006 http://www.sfxchurchliverpool.com/book/intro.php (accessed 15/02/2013)
St Francis Xavier, Liverpool, Short History of the Parish, http://www.sfxchurchliverpool.com/history/historymain.php (accessed 15/02/2013)
Story of the Limerick Soviet, April 1919, D.R. O'Connor Lysaght, 1979, http://libcom.org/library/1919-story-limerick-soviet (accessed 11/02/2013)
Syndicalism and Labour on Merseyside 1906-1914, Bob Holton in Hikins (1973)
Territorial Army in aid of the Civil Power in Britain 1919-1926, P Dennis, Journal of Contemporary History 16, 1981
The Industrial Syndicalist, Tom Mann (ed), collected facsimile of 1911 edition with an introduction by Geoff Brown, Spokesman Books, 1974
The Rising, Fearghal McGarry, Oxford, 2010
The Slow Burning Fuse: the lost history of the British Anarchists, John Quail, Paladin, 1978
The State Response to 1911, Sam Davies, http://www.scribd.com/doc/76539250/The-State-Response-to-1911-Prof-Sam-Davies-LJMU (accessed 1/03/2012)
The Strange Death of Liberal England, George Dangerfield, 1935 (Serif Edition published 1997)
The Ulster Crisis: resistance to Home Rule 1912-14, A T Q Stewart, Faber, 1967
To begin at the beginning: the objectives of the Allied Subversion and War of Intervention in Soviet Russia 1917-1920, Phil Braithwaite, Pensioners for Peace, 1985
Waterford, Gasworks Soviet began 1923 (Article plus podcast), http://www.wlrfm.com/wlrfm-podcasts/on-this-day-podcasts/140656-2012-01-06-12-37-32.html (accessed 17/02/2012)
Women's suffrage movement: a reference guide, 1866-1928 (Google eBook), Elizabeth Crawford, 2001 http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Wo89DfZ-T6AC (accessed 28/02/2012)

There are still lots of other documents I've referred to, especially from Wikipedia, which will be added as they become relevant.
 
Last edited:
Next instalment - Ulster

I'm working on the next instalment now, which will deal with the issue of Ireland and Home Rule and especially the situation in Ulster. It's still a few days away though because the mixture of Republicans, Unionists, labour disputes and women's suffrage is confusing enough without before I start throwing in any further dystopian nastiness!
 
Ulster on the brink

The installment that follows is where the TL really begins to diverge. Despite that, much of what happens also took place in OTL. Where possible I have also used the actual words of the people involved, although sometimes conflating different speeches or writings. The changes are largely in the order of events and the speed at which they take place. The overall effect is that things kick off about a year earlier.

Another is almost complete and will follow very soon (soon by my standards anyway :rolleyes:)
 
Ulster on the Brink 1
Ulster on the brink - Part 1

Ulster on the Brink.


An edited text of a paper presented to the 15th Conference on 20th Century European History, New York, June 23rd 2012.

An understanding of the Irish Emergency is essential for any study of the War of 1914-1920. The events of the Emergency were hugely significant in their impact on Britain's capacity to respond to German aggression at the beginning of the War and later efforts to contain Communist revolutionary movements across Europe between 1917 and 1923.

First Rumblings
The roots of the emergency lie of course in Britain's troubled, centuries old, relationship with Ireland, but the direct cause was Unionist fears of a Dublin government in the event of Home Rule. These fears often seemed paranoid to English politicians, not versed in the unique Irish capacity to hold a grudge for centuries. From time to time statements emerged from the Unionist camp that, given the many protestations of loyalty to the Crown, seemed so bizarre as to make any attempt at rational debate a futile exercise. In January 1911 for example, Captain James Craig, the main organiser of Unionist resistance wrote to a friend:
Germany and the German Emperor would be preferred to the rule of John Redmond, Patrick Ford and the Molly Maguires.​
He wasn't alone. On 23rd September Carson spoke at a vast rally of Unionists at Craigavon (Craig's house), attended by some 50,000.
We are faced with perhaps the most nefarious conspiracy that has ever been hatched against a free people, but make no mistake – we will fight., even though those we fight are going to play with loaded dice. Our demand is a very simple one. We ask for no privileges, but we are determined that no one shall have privileges over us. We ask for no special rights, but we claim the same rights from the same Government as every other part of the United Kingdom. We ask for nothing more; we will take nothing less. It is our inalienable right as citizens of the British Empire, and heaven help the men who try to take it from us. Whatever happens we must be prepared...and time is precious in these things – the morning Home Rule is passed, ourselves to become responsible for the government of the Protestant Province of Ulster.
But - if we are to be put from the Union, and left to the mercies of Mr Redmond and his crew, I would infinitely prefer to change my allegiance right over to Germany and the German Emperor, or to anyone else who has a proper and stable government.
Statements like this were of course seditious and placed the Asquith government in some difficulty. It was clear from the rapturous response that Carson was gaining huge support and he would not be easily silenced. Probably as much from a desire that what they wished for be true as anything else, the Liberals convinced themselves that Carson was bluffing and did nothing. “We must not attach too much importance to the frothings of Sir Edward Carson” said Churchill. The Republicans were equally dismissive with Jerry MacVeagh, the secretary of the Irish Party, saying “Sir Edward will not discard his wig and gown for a spiked helmet and a khaki suit.”

And so matters rested in an uneasy standoff until the new year, with an announcement that Winston Churchill, by then First Lord of the Admiralty, would speak in Belfast on Home Rule, alongside Messrs Redmond and Dillon from the Nationalist Party. This meeting was moreover billed to take place, not in some neutral venue, but at the Ulster Hall, the symbolic heart of Unionism in the North. Unsurprisingly the Ulster Unionist Council, outraged at what they described as 'a deliberate challenge thrown down by Mr Churchill', declared their intention of preventing the meeting taking place at all. Implicit in this response was the message that if he insisted he should be prepared to take the consequences.

Having no doubt achieved what he intended, Churchill agreed to move his speech to another venue, although this proved hard to find. The Opera House remained unavailable, despite rumours of a knighthood for the manager, and eventually the Government was reduced to shipping in a marquee from Scotland and erecting it on the Celtic Football Ground. Fearful of unrest, Dublin Castle also moved five battalions of infantry, two companies of cavalry and many extra police into the Belfast area.

On 8th Feb 1912, a day later than originally planned, Churchill arrived at Larne to be met by a huge crowd, defiantly singing the National Anthem. At lunch in the Grand Central Hotel in Belfast another large – and loud – congregation of Orangemen gathered outside. Their mood was aggressive and it was probably only the presence of Carson and Lord Londonderry standing on the balcony of the Ulster Club opposite that prevented an outright attack on Churchill's car as he left for the football ground. Even so his car was several times surrounded by the crowd and only extricated with some difficulty by escorting police. Indeed on one occasion it seemed likely that it would be overturned, an event later described by one Unionist as being a consequence of the crowd's 'involuntary swaying', although other reports suggested that the presence of Mrs Churchill alongside him was more of a factor with cries of 'Mind the wumman' as the crowds pressed in on the vehicle.

The speech, to a carefully controlled audience, was something of an anti-climax. A huge rainstorm had kept many away. The marquee was partially flooded and only about two thirds full. The only interruptions came from suffragists, one calling out in a broad Belfast accent to demand suffrage for women, while another shouted out “Women are being tortured.” Churchill, perhaps conscious that he was in enough trouble, ignored the interruptions and the women were swiftly removed.

It was after the speech however that trouble really began. Perhaps because of their close shave on the journey out, Mrs Churchill was sent, by circuitous and dingy back streets to the station and thence to Larne while Churchill, never one to duck a fight, returned to his hotel by the same route as before. Here despite the rain the crowd of Orange protesters had grown and this time in the absence of Mrs Churchill they proved less willing to refrain from mobbing the car, rocking it back and fore until it overturned. Having vented their feelings and no doubt prompted by the appearance of a troop of cavalry the crowd then dispersed singing ribald anti-Catholic songs as they went.

Churchill and his companions were eventually recovered from the upturned vehicle. All had only minor injuries apart from Churchill who suffered a broken leg and serious damage to his dignity. The injury was to be leave him with a serious limp and beset by pain for rest of his life. It also left him an implacable enemy of Carson and Unionism.

For King and Country?
Partially as a riposte to Churchill's speech earlier in the month and partially as a demonstration of strength, the Unionists held another huge rally on 24 February at the Agricultural Society show grounds on the edge of Belfast. Around 60,000 Unionists turned out despite bitter cold and driving rain to hear Bonar Law and Carson speak. In an uncompromising speech, delivered in front of a Union Jack some 50 feet across, Bonar Law assured those present that the Conservative Party would support Ulstermen if they resisted Home Rule by force.
Your cause is not that of Ulster alone. Your cause is the Empire's. I can imagine no length of resistance to which Ulster can go, in which I would not be prepared to support them, in which my Party would not support them and in which, in my belief, they would not be supported by the vast majority of the British People.
In his turn Carson returned to his constant theme of Ulster's willingness to fight.
I recognise my responsibility; Heaven knows I am always thinking about it. From morn till night, I think of the grave tragedies that may lie before us. It doesn’t make me shrink one iota as regards myself; no man in my position can help but think of others who have to fight out this battle. I contemplate what may happen, it is natural to feel – even the bravest heart – I shall not say with fear, but with a sense of responsibility that is almost appalling. But I know this, I am dealing in all parts with brave men who have made up their minds and if we have to go into a fight – which God forbid – we will do so knowing that for the last thirty years, for no fault on our part which can alleged against us, we have been a threatened and an outraged people and we will also be conscious in our minds that every warning which it was possible to give the government from the very first day on which this wicked conspiracy was put forward against us – every opportunity was taken warning them that under no circumstances would we submit to be thrust out of the government under which we were born by the most unscrupulous government that I have ever known or read of.
Ulstermen will not suffer to be handed over to a Catholic government in Dublin. We will not suffer to see our loyalty dismissed, set aside and denigrated. Ulster will resist, by force of arms if needed - Ulster will fight.
Carson did not elaborate further how that fight would be organised but that became clear the next day with two announcements by the Ulster Unionist Council. The first was the creation of a Volunteer Army of 100,000 men willing to be trained in the use of arms and ready to use those arms in the defence of Ulster if need be. The second was the launch of a Covenant to be signed by every adult Ulsterman, declaring themselves ready to stand for Ulster and the Union.
BEING CONVINCED in our consciences that Home Rule would be disastrous to the material well-being of Ulster as well as of the whole of Ireland, subversive of our civil and religious freedom, destructive of our citizenship, and perilous to the unity of the Empire, we, whose names are underwritten, men of Ulster, loyal subjects of His Gracious Majesty King George V., humbly relying on the God whom our fathers in days of stress and trial confidently trusted, do hereby pledge ourselves in solemn Covenant, to stand by one another in defending, for ourselves and our children, our cherished position of equal citizenship in the United Kingdom, and in using all means which may be found necessary to defeat a Home Rule Parliament in Ireland. And in the event of such a Parliament being forced upon us, we further solemnly and mutually pledge ourselves to refuse to recognise its authority and to resist its imposition. In sure confidence that God will defend the right, we hereto subscribe our names.
And further, we individually declare that we have not already signed this Covenant.
The choice of words 'men of Ulster' was deliberate. Carson and the others saw the Covenant as a prerequisite for the creation of an armed force in which women were to have no part. A 'Declaration' to be signed by the women of Ulster was launched in parallel which made clear their subservient role.
WE, whose names are underwritten, women of Ulster, and loyal subjects of our gracious King, being firmly persuaded that Home Rule would be disastrous to our Country, desire to associate ourselves with the men of Ulster in their uncompromising opposition to the Home Rule Bill now before Parliament, whereby it is proposed to drive Ulster out of her cherished place in the Constitution of the United Kingdom, and to place her under the domination and control of a Parliament in Ireland.
Praying that from this calamity God will save Ireland, we hereto subscribe our names.
The campaign began in the West at Enniskillen, moving daily closer to Belfast and its climax. At the first rally, 50,000 Orange men marched past the platform in military order. The same pattern continued as the campaign developed; Orangemen paraded in force and the same resolution was passed by acclamation - “We won't have Home Rule”, soon to be abbreviated to “We won't have it” and chanted at every opportunity. The culmination of the campaign came in May in a ceremony at the Ulster Hall in Belfast where Craig handed to Carson a faded banner that had been carried, it was claimed, at the Battle of the Boyne. Unfurling it before the crowd, Carson declaimed “May this flag for ever fly over a free Ulster.”

The next day was a Sunday, with services all over the Province at which the signing of the Covenant was presented as a religious obligation as much as a political one. The Protestant churches gave it their full support, with Charles D'Arcy, Bishop of Down, Connor and Dromore announcing from the pulpit "We hold that no power, not even the British Parliament, has the right to deprive us of our heritage of British citizenship." After the services had ended Carson and other Unionist leaders walked the short distance from the Ulster Hall to Belfast City Hall, preceded by the Boyne Standard presented to him the previous evening and with a guard of men wearing bowler hats and carrying sticks. At the City Hall entrance – no difficulties were offered for this use – Carson was welcomed by the Lord Mayor and Corporation in their Robes, the Poor Law Guardians, the Harbour Commissioners and even the Water Board. Inside, the Covenant was set on a circular table draped with the Union Flag. Carson was the first to sign, followed by Lord Londonderry and then by representatives from the Protestant Churches.

Outside City Hall, under the command of Major Frederick Crawford, another Ulster activist of long standing, Carson's guard had been supplemented by others drawn from Unionist Clubs and Orange Lodges across the Province, and now made a force of some 2,500 men. These marshals admitted the general public to sign in batches of four or five hundred at a time until 11pm that night. Similar enthusiastic scenes were to be found across the Province. Meanwhile, at the Ulster Hall women signed the Declaration of Support, although not without some disruption from suffragists. The treatment given to these women on the day was brutal and something that would rebound on the Unionist movement over the next few years. In public buildings, church halls and Market Squares across the Province, similar signing ceremonies were taking place. By the end of the day, it was claimed by Carson that some 20,000 people had signed the Covenant and 12,000 women the Declaration. Eventually some 300,000 men signed the Covenant and 240,000 women, the Declaration.

In June a British Covenant was announced at a massive rally in London's Hyde Park with probably 300,000 people assembling to hear Lord Milner and Carson speak.
BEING CONVINCED in our consciences that Home Rule would be disastrous to the material well-being of the whole of this United Kingdom and perilous to the unity of the Empire, we, whose names are underwritten, loyal subjects of His Gracious Majesty King George V., do hereby pledge ourselves in solemn Covenant before God, to stand by our fellow countrymen in Ulster in defending, by all means which may be found necessary, their cherished position of equal citizenship in the United Kingdom, and in taking or supporting any action that may be effective to prevent the Home Rule Bill being put into operation, and more particularly to prevent the armed forces of the Crown being used to deprive the people of Ulster of their rights as citizens of the United Kingdom. And in the event of such a Bill being forced upon us, we further solemnly and mutually pledge ourselves to refuse to recognise its authority and to resist its imposition. In sure confidence that God will defend the right, we hereto subscribe our names.
And further, we individually declare that we have not already signed this Covenant.
The signature campaign for this was largely organised through the Primrose League and the Union Defence League. By the end of the summer, two million signatures were obtained. Prominent signatories included Field-Marshal Lord Roberts, Admiral of the Fleet Sir Edward Seymour, Rudyard Kipling, and Sir William Ramsay FRS together with many servicing officers of the Army and Navy.

Despite the huge level of support, many condemned the campaign. The Daily Herald described the signatories as being:
... all members of that treasonous and seditious conspiracy known as the 'British Covenant' in support of armed revolution in Ulster.
Tom Mann, in a speech in Birmingham, was caustic in comparing his treatment for publishing a leaflet calling on troops not to shoot striking workers, while “Knights and Peers of the Realm create private armies” without fear of penalty. Labour MPs in the House of Commons were equally acerbic denouncing Carson and Bonar Law alike as unpatriotic, treasonous and seditious. On several occasions the session had to be suspended by the Speaker with near brawls between members.

Another report in the Daily Herald captured something of the character of the debate.
In great anger at the penalties inflicted on the Syndicalists, Mr. George Lansbury, M.P., speaking in the House of Commons, endeavoured to persuade the Government to take action against the authorities in Ulster who are responsible for the alleged drilling of Ulstermen to resist Home Rule when it comes. Mr. Jerry MacVeagh, the wag who is secretary of the Irish Parliamentary party, referred to a statement of Lord Dunleath that it was not military drill, but squad drill, adding for himself that " the only object was to enable large bodies of Orangemen to turn round when they received a word of; command from their leaders.'' (Laughter.) Mr. Asquith said the Government was fully informed as to what was " going on, " the immediate object being, as I understand, to prepare for a party demonstration in a few weeks time," (Laughter.) If they suspected any seditious purpose they would take action, since no authority could sanction drilling for an illegal purpose. Mr. Lansbury asked if the law would not be called in should the Miners' Federation commence to teach its men drill. Mr. .Asquith: That is a hypothetical question, and I will answer it when it arises. Mr. Lansbury finished up by presenting Mr, Asquith with a leaflet circulated in Ulster informing the people that officers of the army had told their friends they would order their men not to fire on the people of Ulster if they rebelled against Home Rule.
Nationalist feeling elsewhere in the UK was aroused too. In Scotland, 'The Thistle' said:
Scotland has had to fight for years to get her most urgent needs attended to, the demands of her members of Parliament being largely ignored, whether the party in power be Liberal or Conservative. How then arises this difference of treatment? The answer is a sad one, but it is plain and undeniable. The brutal English majority in Parliament turns all but a deaf ear to the manifold requirements of Scotland, because the Scottish people are peaceful and law-abiding—but it truckles to the remonstrances and complaints—civil and religious—of the Irish people, because they resort to violent means if their demands are refused.
Other newspapers played down the Unionist call to arms in favour of attacks on the Home Rule plans. A Times editorial argued that “to shut [the Unionists] out of their present Constitutional position and to subject them to the Nationalists would be oppression of the grossest and most cruel kind” going on to say of the campaign – in Ulster and in the rest of the United Kingdom – that “it is by its gravity, its moderation, and its unflinching firmness that it will arrest the attention and secure the support of the English and the Scottish people.”

Ulster Mobilises
Despite the protestations of Loyalty to the Crown, the launch of the Covenant and the associated mobilisation of the UVF was nothing less than a declaration of willingness to use armed force against His Majesty's Government. Bonar Law repeated his pledge of Conservative Party support for the Unionist cause in numerous speeches both at public meetings and in the Commons. In a particularly heated exchange with Asquith he said:
Do you plan to hurl the full majesty and power of the law, supported on the bayonets of the British Army, against a million Ulstermen marching under the Union Flag and singing 'God Save The King'? Would the Army hold? Would the British people — would the Crown — stand for such a slaughter?
Across Ulster men were signing up in their hundreds for the new Ulster Volunteer Force and enthusiastic bands of men could everywhere be seen drilling, usually with crude wooden staves in place of rifles, although in a few cases armed with shotguns and the occasional rifle.

By the end of April 1912 it was clear to the Nationalists, if not the Government in London, that Unionists were becoming increasingly militarised. Weapons were appearing at parades and training was beginning to include firing exercises. In June the UUC went a step further, approving the creation of a Provisional Government for Ulster if Home Rule became law and setting up a Military Council to oversee the development and arming of the UVF. Lord Roberts of Kandahar was appointed to the command of the UVF. Rumours were already widespread of large scale purchases of arms by agents acting for the UUC and the creation of the Military Council appeared to confirm this. The UUC also launched a fund (underwritten by several wealthy Belfast businessmen) to create an indemnity guarantee for British Officers who resigned their commission or were dismissed for refusing to use force again Loyalists.

The Republicans responded in kind – twice. In May 1912 the creation of an Irish Volunteer Army was announced. Although not admitted in public, it was understood on all sides that the secretive Irish Republican Brotherhood were prime movers. The IRB were traditional Republican and not sympathetic to the concerns of workers or women. Everything was to be subordinated to the task of securing Irish Independence. Faced with this, supporters of Larkin and Connolly began recruiting volunteers for a proposed Irish Citizen Army in July.

Over the next few months all parties focused on building positions of strength. The UVF by the end of June had reached 35,000 members across most of Ulster. From a slow start the IVA had reached only about 8,000 concentrated mostly in Dublin with some small groups in rural areas across the south. By the end of July the figures stood at UVF 40,000, IVA, 20,000 and ICA 1,500. The newly created ICA was concentrated in Dublin with smaller groups in Limerick, Waterford and Cork and Belfast.

As membership in these militias grew so did intercommunal tensions. On 29th June matters came to a head, when a Protestant Sunday School outing was attacked by a group of Republicans from the Ancient Order of Hibernians who took exception to the union jacks being waved in the procession. Seeing the attack under way, other locals joined in the affray. More by luck than anything else, the two groups were eventually separated by the few available local police officers without any serious physical injuries, who then managed to get the Protestant group onto their train back to Belfast. By Monday, the story of the attack had spread across Orange Belfast, no doubt multiplied in the telling, and the inevitable reprisals began. Roman Catholic workers in the ship yards were attacked and driven from the yards and more attacks took place on their homes. Retaliations by Republicans were swift. Throughout July and August tit for tat attacks continued with both Catholic and Protestant families attacked at work, on the streets and in their homes.

By now the Government, while publicly dismissive, was beginning to be concerned. They were already faced by major disruption from labour disputes, with 10,000 troops committed to the North East of England and at least 40,000 troops deployed elsewhere to support hard pressed police. The prospect now of violence in Ulster was not appealing, especially given that Republicans were also mobilising against the perceived threat of an anti-Catholic and anti-Republican militia. To make matters worse, suffragist violence was also on the increase with intermittent arson attacks on Unionist properties and the property of prominent Unionists in Ulster and more generally in London and elsewhere.

The Committee Stage of Home Rule Bill was also considered in June. A late amendment to exclude Antrim, Armagh, Down and Londonderry was reluctantly accepted by the Unionists but after three days of debate was defeated by 69 votes, failing to secure Asquith's support. This was nevertheless a tactical victory for the Unionists since at least the Government had been forced to admit of the possibility of a separate Ulster. Speaking at a meeting in London, Carson admitted that the result was not unexpected. He went on to say however:
I think the time has come for us to take a step forward in our campaign and that is what I shall recommend be done.
Not for the first time Carson was ambiguous about the precise meaning of his statements. Publicly there was a large military style parade in Belfast at the beginning of September, where, for the first time armed members of the UVF appeared in public, although without any overt recognition of the fact from Carson or other members of the UUC. Similar parades took place over the next few weeks across the Province. The UUC also announced that a commission had been established to prepare a constitution for any Provisional Government that might need to be established with the aim of a report before the end of 1912.

[Part 2 - Ulster arms itself]
 
Last edited:
Ulster on the Brink 2
Ulster on the Brink Part 2

Ulster arms itself
Behind the scenes the Military Council was organising and becoming more professional. Roberts had established his HQ in the Old Belfast Town Hall back in July and rapidly appointed his staff. Craig was identified as Political Officer, but in practice his duties also included securing enough arms for the rapidly growing UVF to allow proper training and equipping. To this end he had suggested to Roberts the appointment as Director of Ordnance of Major Frederick Crawford. Crawford had become convinced that Ulster would have to fight for its existence during the Home Rule debates of the 1880s and 90s at which time he had first begun trying to import arms. In 1906 he had advertised in various French, Belgian, German and Austrian newspapers to buy 10,000 rifles and 2m rounds of ammunition. In 1911, with the use of aliases and disguises, he had with some local support (including from police officers who looked the other way) made some small scale purchases in Glasgow and later acquired five hundred rifles and 3m rounds in Manchester. Attempts to import these had failed however and they had been seized by customs officials on the docks in Liverpool. He had been unsuccessful on that occasion but in the process had gained a great deal of knowledge of the arms market to supplement his practical experience during the Boer War under Roberts.

Crawford immediately set to work. His past experience told him that although it was technically not illegal to buy arms, there were technical restrictions on their movement and import and he would need to operate in some secrecy, especially since he was now able to consider the purchase and import of much larger quantities and of much improved quality. To support him, he recruited two licensed Belfast gunsmiths, Robert Adgey and William Hunter who had themselves also been attempting to import weapons. Over the previous two years the pair of them had managed to import some 500 rifles and 3m rounds of ammunition.

In February 1912, Adgey had managed to buy 50,000 rifles, 100 Maxim machine guns, 1500 Webley pistols and 2 batteries of field artillery from a dealer in Birmingham. These were still sitting in the suppliers warehouses waiting to be collected. Crawford now sent Adgey and Hunter to England where, using respectable businesses as a fronts, they set up a network of depots in Liverpool, Manchester, Glasgow, London, West Hartlepool, Bedford, Rugby and Darlington. The weapons already acquired were moved from the warehouse into these depots, where they were repackaged under a range of guises and quickly moved on to another depot. Within a few weeks the entire consignment had been dispersed and hidden. The next steps were to arrange shipment to Ireland and dispersal to the various UVF units. Crawford left this to Craig with Adgey and Hunter, while he travelled to Germany with the aim of buying more weaponry.

He had already made contact with Bruno Spiro, an arms dealer in Hamburg, who had been very helpful and more to the point discreet. In 1911 an attempt to buy 20,000 Italian rifles was frustrated when the company with whom they were negotiating informed the British government. Spiro had stepped in and recovered the weapons and then stored them safely without disclosing the fact that their eventual destination was still Ulster. Crawford and Spiro had since then built up a firm friendship and trusted each other beyond the limits of their commercial dealings. In August of 1912 Crawford met Spiro and negotiated the purchase of 35,000 modern rifles and 4m rounds of ammunition for £83,000. Funding for this was now in place, raised in part from the same businessmen who had underwritten the Indemnity Fund for British officers, but also from Orange groups in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and the USA. An Australian millionaire of Ulster origins, Sir Samuel McCaughey contributed £25,000 in one donation while several others exceeded £10,000.

The purchase made and payment arranged, it was now time to organise shipment to Ireland. Crawford decided, after consultation with Craig and with Carson to go for a single big shipment. “I'll see you through this business, if I should have to go to prison for it” said Carson as he endorsed the plans. It was clear that attempting to use English or Scottish ports would only result in the loss of most of the weapons, since Customs officers were becoming increasingly well informed about attempts to move arms. The weapons purchased in Birmingham were still sitting in various locations around the coast. The rifles however were of various obsolete designs without much in the way of ammunition and Crawford now developed an elaborate plan to use these as decoys while the main shipment was being brought in.

Cruise of the Berthe

In Bergen, Crawford found a ship, the S.S. Berthe. The Antrim Iron Ore and Coal Steamship Company released a ship's master and his engineer and they now travelled to Hamburg to join Crawford and from there went to Bergen to inspect the Berthe. She proving suitable, the purchase went ahead and the ship's crew were recruited for the venture under their original captain. Crawford now returned to Hamburg while the Berthe set sail under a Norwegian flag for a rendezvous point in Danish waters. He had made arrangements with Spiro for each rifle to be packed with 200 rounds of ammunition and these then wrapped in bundles of five. He expected that when the guns were landed they would need to be offloaded and dispersed very quickly. The repackaging had cost him another £2000 but would prove well worth the effort. Spiro also added the 20,000 Italian Vetterli rifles from the previous purchase to the shipments being prepared. If all went well, Crawford would be landing some 55,000 rifles of which 35,000 had only just been withdrawn from use in the Austrian Army.

The packages were loaded onto a barge and towed through the Kiel Canal to the rendezvous point in shallow waters off the Danish coast near the port of Langeland. There in early October they were trans-shipped to the Berthe. The transfer of cargoes however caught the attention of Danish port officials who boarded the ship and demanded to see the manifest. Suspicious, they took away the ships papers, promising to return them the next morning at 8.00. Overnight the weather worsened with heavy seas and a thick fog. It became obvious that the launch carrying the Port Officer would not be able to come out. Crawford waited until the appointed hour so that he could if need be claim the moral ground later, and then gave the order to set sail, anxious to get out of Danish waters as soon as possible.

Back in the UK, Crawford's team began an elaborate shell game, moving consignments between ports along the West Coast while two small freighters, the SS Cabinet Minister and the SS Larne Queen also wandered up and down the coast as if waiting for instructions. Meanwhile, the Berthe with her funnel now painted black instead of its previous bright yellow and with a new name, Doreen painted on canvas sheets, quietly headed north as if for Bergen. The intention was that the movements of the two decoy vessels along the coast and the moving of various consignments, some fake, on shore would be conspicuous enough to attract the attention of the authorities who would hopefully be distracted while the Berthe slipped north to a planned rendezvous in the remote Loch Laxford in the far north west of Scotland. Unfortunately crossing from the Swedish coast towards England they hit some heavy weather and were forced to put into the coal port of Blyth in Northumberland, this time under a third name of Fanny. Without papers this was a risky decision, but coming in at night they avoided problems. Fortunately by dawn the next morning the weather cleared and they managed to slip away without further difficulties to continue their journey north but not before sending a coded cable describing their progress.

Meanwhile, in Barrow, the Cabinet Minister had been boarded by port authorities but unable to find anything they were eventually released. Seizing the opportunity they took on 5,000 rifles and the component parts of two field guns that had somehow escaped detection on the quayside plus some coal and set off for Belfast. A further ship, the Clydevalley was at the time in Greenock awaiting instructions. On receiving the cable from Berthe she was sent north to meet them in Loch Laxford. The rest of Berthe's journey passed without incident. They were pretty much indistinguishable from the rest of the busy coastal traffic. At the end of October they edged their way into Loch Laxford to see the Clydevalley waiting. Against all the odds the cruise of the Berthe had succeeded, although the difficult task of actually landing the weapons in Ulster was still ahead.

[Part 3 to follow soon]
 
Last edited:
Liverpool Interlude
Its not all plain sailing

Liverpool, Oct 15th, 2.00am
Dan Reagan peered through a slit in the door of the canalside warehouse. Behind him half a dozen men waited silently, each armed with clubs or large knives. Reagan himself had a pistol tucked into his belt.

“They're here” he snapped.

Without waiting for instruction the men behind him melted into the darkness. Reagan pulled out his pistol and stepped behind the a large crate to the side.

From outside came the muffled noise of men's voices, then the noise of lorries bumping over an uneven surface. The padlock on the doors was opened, keys clanking, the doors slid back and the two waiting trucks pulled in. As the door closed again, the warehouse was suddenly flooded with light from several electric lanterns held by Reagan's men.

The leader of those who had just arrived cursed then went for his pocket. “I wouldn't if I were you” said Reagan, stepping from behind his crate, pistol steadily pointed at the other man. He gestured with the pistol - “Now if you gentlemen would get down from the lorries and move to the side? ”

Suddenly the doors opened again, Reagan didn't move. Three more of his men came in, each carrying pistols. They covered the men climbing down from the lorry cabs then the whole group as the others moved in with ropes and chains. “It will be the better for all of us if you cooperate nicely” said Reagan. The others looked at each other then their bodies slumped as they accepted the inevitable. They were rapidly tied up and gagged, then deposited without ceremony at the back of the warehouse.

Reagan jumped up onto the back of one of the lorries, lifting the cover. Several crates prominently labelled 'Machine Parts' could be seen. “This is it boys” he called out exultantly “a good haul for the cause – and at the expense of these Orange bastards to boot”.

He jumped down as two of the others men climbed into the cabs and reversed the lorries out, followed by the rest of the group before they all disappeared into the darkness.
 
Last edited:
Coming soon

I hope someone is still reading this!

Part 3 of the gun-running should be posted soon, being almost complete. There will also be an instalment on the labour disputes on the mainland (building on the events in NE England) and another on women's suffrage in Ireland - Lady Charlotte will be back. I also have some ideas for a wider look at events elswhere in the world, probably South Africa and Australia and perhaps the USA.

It gets a bit vaguer after that, but I expect 1913 to get quite rough and for it to go downhill from there for quite a while.
 
I hope someone is still reading this!

Part 3 of the gun-running should be posted soon, being almost complete. There will also be an instalment on the labour disputes on the mainland (building on the events in NE England) and another on women's suffrage in Ireland - Lady Charlotte will be back. I also have some ideas for a wider look at events elswhere in the world, probably South Africa and Australia and perhaps the USA.

It gets a bit vaguer after that, but I expect 1913 to get quite rough and for it to go downhill from there for quite a while.

I am definitely still reading this, and am looking forward to it continuing - fascinating stuff. :)
 
Thanks - its nice to get some feedback. I know that there are now lots of threads on similar themes but I hope the line I'm taking is a bit different. It's certainly taken me a long time to get here. :(
 
Cabinet 1
The Cabinet considers events

(This Document is the Property of His Britannic majesty's Government)​
SECRET​
MINUTES of a Meeting held at 10 Downing Street, SW,​
on Wednesday June 26, 1912. at 11-30 a.m.

Present

The Prime Minister (in the Chair)
The Rt Hon. R. McKenna, M.P. Home Secretary
The Rt Hon, Sir Edward Grey, Bt, M.P. Foreign Secretary
The Rt Hon. J. E. B. Seely, D.S.O., M.P. Secretary of State for War,
The Rt Hon. T. McKinnon Wood, M.P. Secretary for Scotland,
The Rt Hon. A. Birrell, K.C. M.P. Chief Secretary for Ireland
The Rt Hon. S. Buxton, M.P. President of the Board of Trade

Also in attendance

Field Marshal Sir J. French, KCB, KCMG, GCVO, Chief of the Imperial General Staff
Sir E. Henry, KCB, GCVO, KPM, Commisioner of Police of the Metropolis
F. Caldwell Esq., Head Constable, Liverpool City Police
H. P. P. Lane Esq., Chief Constable, Lancashire
Lt Col H. M. A. Warde, Chief Constable, Kent
...
3. The Current Disturbances

The Home Secretary said that the situation across the North and in South Wales is rapidly deteriorating. Police Officers are becoming exhausted by the demands placed upon on them and many have been injured. There is every indication that the location and timing of outbreaks of violence have been designed to maximise the pressures placed on police forces and their ability to respond in a timely and effective manner. The position in North East England was particularly grave, especially on Tyneside and in the Northumberland mining areas and on Teesside amongst steel workers, where rioting had taken place each day for the past four days.

He said that with the approval of the Prime Minister he had asked the Commissioner and his colleagues to attend to give evidence on the capacity of the police service to meet the pressures now placed upon them by the present disorders in the coalfields. He had intended that one of the Chief Constables from the North East would be in attendance today, but the grave situation they faced prevented their attendance. They were however in daily communication with his office.

The Commissioner said that he was speaking for all the Chief Constables here present and had been in communication with many others on the issue. They were all of the opinion that while there was no orchestrated conspiracy, many normally disparate groups were finding ways to come together to make the most of the present unrest. In London and Liverpool there was strong evidence of involvement by Irish nationalists, in London by Indian nationalists. In both these cases there is a suggestion of German support. Communist agitators were at work in all the industrial areas of the country, prominent among whom was Tom Mann. Some Republicans, such as James Connolly were known to be sympathetic to the ideas espoused by Mann and others, and the possible coming together of Irish and Communist agitation was not something to be desired. The activities of Orangemen in Ireland were also it seems receiving some support from German quarters, presumably under the principle of general mischief making. Lt Col. Warde added that although the majority of the disturbances had been in the main cities and industrial areas of the North of England, there had also been some disturbances in the Kent Coalfields.

The Prime Minister asked the Home Secretary if in his opinion the police in the North East of England could continue to cope with current levels of violent behaviour. The Home Secretary replied that that stage had not yet been reached but matters were coming close. In view of the events in Newcastle in June, troops already despatched to the area were being used so far as possible to escort food convoys and guard key establishment such as railway yards and the like. Even in these limited roles they regularly come under attack. On three occasions these attacks have involved the use of firearms.

The CIGS said that while he could provide a small number of additional troops for use in the North East, this would mean moving them from elsewhere which was likely to provide an opening for further disruption in those locations. He did not have enough men to deploy on routine police patrols and did not consider it desirable to do so. Commitment of extra men would in any case mean withdrawal from duties in the colonies and would take some time to arrange. He did not believe it advisable to withdraw men from duties in Ireland.

The Prime Minister asked the Home Secretary if an increase in the number of Special Constables might help to release police from more routine duties. The Home Secretary replied that the numbers of Special Constables had been doubled since 1910 and they were already fully committed. It was not possible to despatch Special Constables from one area of the country to another and so there was also the possibility of some sympathies existing between the Special Constables and local people, much as had already been seen with some units of the Territorial Forces. He was of the opinion that the problems experienced with the Territorials in Newcastle were as much to do with such local sympathies as with indiscipline or cowardice.

The Prime Minister asked the Foreign Secretary what calls upon the Army and Navy might be foreseeable given Army mobilisations in Germany and elsewhere. The Foreign Secretary replied that there seemed a high risk of war breaking out somewhere in Europe and Britain being drawn in could not be ruled out. It was important therefore to keep the Army as ready for action as was possible. The Army Manoeuvres planned for September were a part of maintaining that state of readiness.

The Prime Minister asked the Commissioner and the Chief Constables for their views on how the Police might be better able to meet the calls on them in times of civil disorder. Lt Col Warde suggested that consideration be given to the creation of a National Police Force, distinct from present local constabularies, specially trained to deal with major disturbances to the peace. Constitutionally the use of the Army in such circumstances was always difficult, and the chain of command was not always as clear as it might be. A national force, organised on military lines, with military standards of discipline, but under civilian direction might offer a way through these difficulties. The most effective police actions in such disturbances often involved the use of horses, so such a force might well benefit from being mounted. As with the Army they should also be armed.

The Commissioner was concerned that such a force might be seen as converting the Police into units of the Army rather than vice versa, but he could nevertheless see merit in the idea. Mr Caldwell asked who would command such a force if they were called in to police a disturbance such as those in Liverpool last year or those in Newcastle last month. Would the responsibility for their disposition be handed to the Special Force Commander or would it remain with the local Constabulary? If the former it might well have the effect raised by the Commissioner. If such a force was raised he was of the opinion that they should be seen as an Auxiliary Force and placed under local command. Mr Lane asked if such a Force would have investigatory powers since again this might well duplicate efforts in local forces.

The Prime Minister said that there appeared only to be three choices available. First an increase in the overall numbers of the police, but it could not be guaranteed that any additional numbers would be in the right location in the event of any disturbances. Second some changes might be made to the way in which the Army was called in, probably by recourse to the Emergency Powers Act just signed by His Majesty. Third was the creation of a National Police Auxiliary to be organised along the lines suggested by Lt Col Warde. He asked the Home Secretary to prepare a paper setting out pro and con of each of these, for consideration in seven days time.
 
Last edited:
According to the National Archives "Up to 1916, a letter written by the Prime Minister to the monarch was the only record of the decisions of Cabinet" so there is a bit of dramatic licence here.
 
Ulster on the Brink 3
Ulster on the Brink Part 3 - landing the guns

It begins
After the Berthe made successful rendezvous with the Clydevalley in Loch Laxford, the most difficult task still remained – getting the weapons into Ulster and distributed to the various units of the UVF. Here again, the combination of Crawford and Craig proved highly effective, especially in combination with Lord Roberts Chief of Staff, Lt Col. Sir George Richardson. Roberts although willing to throw his huge prestige behind the Ulster cause was not well enough to be much more than a figurehead. Richardson however proved well up to the task and within the limits of the resources available had brought the UVF to a high state of efficiency. In one area he was in fact well ahead of most thinking, even in full time professional armies, in the creation of a highly organised Motor Corps. This unit was to prove decisive in the successful landing and distribution of the weapons.

Security was tight. Very few people knew that the Clydevalley had successfully taken on board the weapons. Most of those believed that the landing was to be made in Belfast. However, late on the evening of September 4th the Berthe sailed openly into Belfast Lough, sending dummy signals by lantern to the shore. At the same time Clydevalley put into the Harbour at Larne while the Larne Queen, which had had by now picked up another consignment of the Birmingham arms, put into Bangor, and the Cabinet Minister, which had been forced to return to Barrow with engine problems, into Donaghadee about six miles from Bangor.

On September 1st all units of the UVF had been told to report to their normal drill location without arms on the evening of 4th September and to be prepared to stay there all night. The Belfast Division were to stand by for further instructions. Despatch riders were sent to watch the police and military barracks and report all movements. Others were to go to various locations on the main roads from Belfast to Larne and Bangor to watch for movement of police or army. Members of the Motor Corps were instructed to report to Larne at 11.00 pm on 4th September, with an extra driver, fuel and warned not to drive at speed or draw any attention to themselves by the blowing of horns etc. On arrival they were to obey the instructions of Marshals. Some two dozen members of the Corps were given similar instructions to report to Bangor and Donaghadee.

The landings
At 8.30 on the 4th, 500 men of the East Belfast Regiment of the UVF arrived on the Quayside in Belfast, soon followed by a large force of vehicles of all sorts including horse drawn carts, coal wagons and motor lorries where they were all marshalled into a waiting area. By 9.00 pm 1,000 men of the North Belfast Regiment marched to the Midland Railway station where they proceeded to place a guard around the station and to occupy the departure platform (for Larne) with a large force. The aim was not to despatch these men to Larne, but to frustrate any attempt by the army or police to do so. At the same time, the remaining Belfast regiments moved into their sectors across the city where they occupied key locations and carried out patrols. These men were under orders to avoid Nationalist areas and to refrain from creating any disturbances. By 9.30, the UVF HQ in Belfast Old Town Hall was under guard by some 200 specially picked men.

Across Ulster the rest of the UVF stayed in their drill halls, although sending out frequent partols along main roads, again with instructions to avoid Nationalist areas, but otherwise to be as obvious as possible.

At about 11.00 pm, the Berthe finally docked in Belfast. Customs officials immediately boarded demanding to inspect the ships papers and the cargo. The ship's Captain however offered only vague and obstructive responses, claiming to have mislaid his keys and saying he could not open the ship's hatches without instructions from the owners. He continued to play this game throughout the night to the increasing frustration of the police and customs officers attempting to search the ship. At one point the senior customs officer ordered the hatch covers to be removed only for the captain to immediately have them replaced.

While this cat and mouse game was going on in Belfast, the other ships were getting ready to unload their cargoes. At 10.30 the Clydevalley tied up in Larne, followed soon afterwards by the Larne Queen into Bangor and the Cabinet Minister into Donaghadee. By 11.15 all three ships were busily off loading into waiting motor vehicles which once they had received as many bundles as they could carry drove off into the darkness to deliver them to several secret locations just outside Larne and Bangor before returning for another load. By 1.00 am the Larne Queen and Cabinet Minister had both discharged their entire cargoes and were loading coal ready to put to sea. By 2.30 am the Clydevally was also clear and the quayside deserted. At about 3.15, the Customs men were finally allowed to take off the hatch covers of the Berthe where of course they found nothing but coal.

The next morning in London Carson received a one word telegram – LION – the code for full success.
 
The Germany that occupies Britain doesn't have to be the Nazis--it could be an alternate government.

Heck, have Britain be on the wrong side of *WWII and this could happen.

Interested to see where you take this...
 
Updates and coming soon

The Bibliography has now been updated, although still far from complete.

Next post is probably on suffragist terrorism, followed by the developing situiation in Ireland after the successful gun-running exploit by the Unionists.

Other posts.

  • National Police Auxiliary Force
  • Labour unrest worsens
  • Republicans and Germany
  • Independence movements in India and elsewhere
  • Sectarianism
As I write more, I'm finding it easier to write more, so with luck things will speed up. Even so, I expect these installments won't get me past 1913, so still a long way to go to 1947...
 
Lady Charlotte 2 Letter to Mrs P
From Aristocrat to Revolutionary - the letters of Lady Charlotte Fitzgerald
Volume 1 1905-1919
Published by the Limerick Workers Press 1955


After the 'Battle of Parliament Square', Lady Charlotte was taken by her father to their home in Ireland. He was annoyed with his daughter for 'brawling in the streets' as he put it, but he remained supportive of the general principle of women's suffrage. The increasingly violent behaviour of the WSPU however led to a break both by him and his daughter.

In February 1911, only a couple of months after the family move to Limerick, Charlotte's father, Lord Ballincarron, died. The title passed to her twin brother David, who preferred the life of London to rural Ireland. Accordingly, he made over the family house in Limerick to his sister, together with sufficient money to maintain it and to keep her in a 'suitable' style. From there she began her extraordinary correspondence with prominent figures in the arts, literature, politics and science. No one of note seems to have escaped her attention. In her personal archive are copies of letters (and replies) to George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Rosa Luxembourg, Tom Mann, all three Pankhursts, Charlotte Despard, Eugene Debs, James Connolly, Lorenzo Portet, Emma Goldman, Robert Frost, Ezra Pound, Carl Sandburg, Vachel Lindsay, Marianne Moore, Winston Churchill, Herbert Asquith, George Askwith, Albert Schweitzer and many others.

She did not however limit her activities to correspondence. She was a member of the WSPU before her move to Ireland and after quitting membership she remained closely linked with Sylvia Pankhurst and her Women's Suffrage Federation. On settling in Limerick in 1910 she quickly joined the Irish Women's Franchise League and later became an active member of the Irish Women Workers' Union. She was closely associated with most of the key figures of the Irish Left, working tirelessly to bring together the three strands of socialism, women's suffrage and Irish Independence. Indeed, without her involvement it is unlikely that Ireland would have escaped the shift to the right that was such a dramatic feature of English politics in the 1920s and 30s.

Her break with the WSPU came early in 1912, even before they began their major campaign of arson and bomb attacks.


3rd June 1912
Dear Mrs Pankhurst,
Until now I have given the W.S.P.U. my unlimited and unstinting support. After the appalling behaviour of the police in Parliament Square in 1910, I was convinced that direct action was needed if women were to attain equal suffrage rights. The latest campaign though, of attacks on pillar boxes and arson attacks on public buildings, is going too far. I now hear talk of much more to come and perhaps worse. These tactics will not gain us support, but the opposite. Attacks on post boxes do not make any difference to the men in control, they only disrupt the lives of ordinary people, men and women. The burning down of buildings, even buildings largely used by men such as cricket pavilions places lives at risk. If the talk I hear is to be believed then very soon someone will be killed and it is highly likely to be an innocent person uninvolved in the struggle. I must therefore resign my membership of the W.S.P.U.

With great regret
Charlotte Fitzgerald


The reply was brief and acerbic:
To be militant in some way is a moral obligation. Every woman owes this to her own conscience and self-respect, and to future generations of women. If any woman does not take part in militant action, she shares in the crime of the Government.
EP
 
Last edited:
Suffrage 1 Terror campaign
Suffragism becomes terrorism - the Suffragist Terror Campaign of 1912-1913

At first demonstrations by women determined to get the vote were limited to heckling at public meetings and mass public demonstrations. The 'Battle of Parliament Square' however changed things. Mrs Pankhurst, who to a large degree was the WSPU, decided that if men were willing to use such violence against women in peaceful demonstrations, then reciprocal violence was the only way in which they were likely to achieve change. She saw how Republican violence had driven Asquith's government into considering Home Rule, she saw how Sir Edward Carson, a respected politician was actively advocating and supporting public resistance to the will of Parliament and concluded that women needed to take the same approach.

The first steps were tentative. Women shopping in London would suddenly pull from their bags a hammer and smash a shop window, crying 'Votes for Women'. Newspaper reports however dismissed these events as the actions of cranks. Accordingly the level of action was stepped up.

On 1 March 1912, a co-ordinated attack by dozens of women took place across the West End. in Regent Street, Piccadilly, Bond Street, Oxford Street and Trafalgar Square. At precisely 3.00 numerous women began smashing shop windows in Regent Street. As police rushed to the scene, another group struck in Oxford Street, then another in Piccadilly, in Oxford Street, Bond Street and Trafalgar Square. Within an hour the main shopping streets of central London were covered with broken glass. Over the next few weeks similar actions took place in Manchester, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Dublin Belfast and many other towns. In early June, the windows of London just repaired were again shattered. Mrs Pankhurst declared that she was ready for sedition, or anything else, so long as it would bring the vote for women. If men came to the House of Commons with plenty of sticks and stones she would be there.

It was these events which prompted the resignation of Lady Charlotte Fitzgerald and many others from the WSPU. Some turned away from the cause altogether, others formed new groups to work alongside men for universal suffrage and for wider social justice. The response of the Pankhursts was typically autocratic, expelling anyone who failed to follow them exactly. In one of her many letters, Lady Charlotte observed drily: ‘Mrs Pankhurst wants us to have votes, but she does not wish us to have opinions.’

On 12 August 1912, the tearooms in Regents Park were damaged by fire. Two days later, the refreshment pavilion at Kew Gardens was burned to the ground. There were sporadic attacks on wood yards and empty buildings for the next couple of months. In October, several suburban railway stations were destroyed by fire and there were numerous fires, some serious, at country houses from the West Country to Norwich, and from Derbyshire to Kent. In November, racecourse stands at Ayr in Scotland and Thirsk in the North Riding were burnt to the ground. Worse was to come.

On the afternoon of 13 December 1912, a police officer noticed a milk can attached to railings outside the Bank of England. As he examined it smoke began to escape from the top. He immediately grabbed the can and plunged it into the water of a fountain outside the nearby Royal Exchange which extinguished the fuse. The bomb, when examined proved to be sophisticated in design. It consisted of a large charge of high explosive surrounded by nails, with a timing mechanism made up of a watch and battery. Had it exploded in that crowded location opposite the Stock Exchange, it would certainly have caused serious injuries and probably deaths.
On 18th February, 1913, a bomb exploded in a house which Lloyd George, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, was having built at Walton Heath in Surrey. The building was almost completely destroyed. A few days later, an unexploded bomb was found at Westbourne Park tube station. Over the next few months more bombs were discovered in dozens of locations including St Pauls, the National Gallery, government offices in Whitehall and various post offices. Letters bombs and packages containing dangerous chemicals were also sent; a letter bomb was found addressed to the chief magistrate at Bow Street court and a package containing acids, addressed to Asquith, the Prime Minister, injured a member of staff in Downing Street. Only chance had prevented serious loss of life.

On the afternoon of 11 June 1913, that finally happened. A huge explosion echoed through Westminster Abbey, caused by a bomb packed with iron nuts and bolts and so designed to cause as much damage as possible. It had been planted near the Coronation Chair and went off just as a party of visitors were passing by. In the event, it was something of a miracle that only three died. The blast was partly absorbed by the stonework on an altar was damaged and parts of the coronation chair were blown off.

On 12 July, another attempt was made to plant a bomb in the church of St John the Evangelist, which had already been damaged in an explosion that March. This time the woman planting the bomb was caught red-handed. On the same day however a railway station near Leicester was badly damaged in an explosion, injuring several railwaymen and an explosion occurred on a mail train from Blackpool to Manchester, injuring one and destroying most of the mail being carried.

By now the bombing campaign was exacerbating the stresses in the WSPU caused by the autocratic behaviour of Mrs Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel and the organisation was losing much of its support. Mrs Pankhurst was however undeterred even to the point of expelling Sylvia, her own daughter who had become involved with a group of working-class women and helped them to set up the East London Suffrage Federation. Her sister Christabel told her: ‘You have a democratic constitution for your East London Federation; we do not agree with that … You have your own ideas. We do not want that.”

Although they could not have known it at the time, the disruption being caused at what was already an unstable time, was having a significant impact - but not as they expected. The German Ambassador to London sent a telegram to Berlin saying, in the context of German planning for a possible conflict with Britain:
This country is close to revolution. Across the north of England, in Scotland and in Wales they are hard pressed to deal with communist and anarchist insurgents. In Ireland they face opposition from both the Unionists opposed to Home Rule and the Republicans who demand it. Even their women are in revolt, with several attempts on the life of Asquith and senior members of the Government. At the same time unrest is stirring in their colonies. If we can ensure they are kept occupied in this way, I do not believe England will be willing to face up to Germany in the event of war. They have too much to contend with at home.
 
Last edited:
He was a weaselly little figure, pale, with dark hair swept to one side and a shrivelled excuse for a moustache under his nose. You will know how Hussars are inordinately proud of their long moustachios so this toothbrush of his was the subject of much ribaldry on their part. He spoke no English, or at least would not admit to it. I ascertained, using my limited German, that he was an Austrian. I looked at his drawings and they were pathetic daubs, certainly not the drawings of a spy.
1911, he could have had a rather more impresssive mostaches if he'd managed to grow the one that he had in 1914 by then. The "shrivelled excuse" was a WW1 change pushed on its troops by the German army later on in the war so that it would fit inside a gas-mask.
 
Telford 3 Escapes
John Telford

Fenham Barracks, Newcastle
5.30 am. 28 July 1912
A bang on the cell door. “Get your arse out of bed Telford. Move.”
John Telford lurched awake. He'd been dreaming of his sisters again, of before. Before he had ended up here for refusing to shoot at his own workmates. The cell door clashed back. A tin bowl with some thin porridge and a battered mug containing some milk less weak tea clattered on the floor before the door slammed shut again.

“You've got ten minutes” said the voice.

Shaking himself from sleep John sat up. He grabbed his shirt and trousers from a hook on the wall and pulled them on, then slipped his feet into his worn boots. The same boots he had been wearing when the army arrested him three weeks ago. The same filthy clothes. He gulped down the tea and porridge before going to the high window and peering up at the sky. It was just beginning to get light outside. So far as he could tell it was going to be a warm day.
Another bang. “Stand away from the door” came the same voice. Obediently John stepped back against the wall. He'd already learned the hard way what would happen if he didn't. The door flew open and in walked a large man in the uniform of a Corporal in the Military Foot Police. “Come with me” he said, “you're going on a nice holiday to Durham.” He turned on his heel and marched out. John followed him. In the corridor outside were two more MPs. They fell in beside him, one holding each arm, while the corporal strode ahead.

Waiting outside was a horsedrawn van. The corporal opened the rear doors and motioned to John to climb in. He did so followed by the two MPs. The corporal banged on the side of the van calling “On your way driver”. The van clattered off across the barrack yard. John turned to the two soldiers sitting by the door. “What's going on?” The nearest, a skinny, sharp featured type simply ignored him. The other, a much older man answered however. “You are off to Durham Jail to start your sentence.”

John sighed to himself. He knew the day was coming, but he still hadn't reconciled himself to the idea of being in prison. The older man looked at him sympathetically. “Don't worry – two months ain't long. If these new regulations had come in before you done it, you could have had two years.” The skinny soldier snarled at him.
“Don't waste your breath on this coward Dan. He left his mates in the lurch – he deserves all he gets.”

“That's easy for you to say – you weren't told to shoot down your friends and family” replied John.

The older man looked at John again. “What happened then?”

“We were on the Town Moor in Newcastle, supposed to stop trouble at a big Union meeting. The bobbies tried to arrest Tom Mann and got themselves knocked about for it, then the cavalry charged in and all hell broke loose. The crowd panicked when some of them were trampled and they ran. My mother and two sisters were there, and lots of my workmates. I could see them in the crowd as they ran towards me. I wasn't going to shoot them down. It was the bobbies that caused it anyway. So I got out of the way with my squad. None of us were willing to shoot.”

The skinny one's expression softened slightly. “You was in the Terriers weren't you? Stands to reason you wouldn't shoot. I don't suppose I would shoot my old mum either. My old man might be another thing though.” He laughed bitterly.

The horse clopped on slowly.

“We aren't going all the way to Durham in this are we?”

“No” said Dan “we're going to put you on a train at Gateshead. It's quieter there than the Central. I'd have a kip if I were you. You'll probably going to need all the rest you can get once you get to Durham.”

John lifted his feet on to the bench beside him and laid his head back against the side of the van. There were no windows but a small canvas hatch in the roof and two small grills in the rear doors let in some light. He dozed.

John woke suddenly, looking around. From the light filtering in to the van it was now fully light. The van had halted and from outside he could hear shouting. Suddenly the doors at the rear were thrown open and a rifle thrust through.

“You two! Out” The two MPs glanced at each other before slowly climbing out. The rifle withdrew and a head was stuck through the door. “Are you going to stay there all day?” John looked on in amazement. “Jack? What the hell are you doing?”

“What do you effing think I'm doing. I'm getting you out – now come on before we get company.”

John clambered down from the rear of the van and looked around. They were halted just on the High Level Bridge. Ahead of him he could see half a dozen men in military uniform armed with rifles guarding the road. He recognised members of his platoon. He turned to his rescuer. It was his cousin, Jack Jones, a fellow member of the Territorials and like him a corporal in charge of another section. They had been on duty with him that day but luckily had not been near any of the trouble.

“This is mutiny though Jack.”

“It's not mutiny mate – its a revolution! Those bastards in London have been sending in the regulars to shoot us down across the country for too long. Now we are fighting back.”
 
Tom Mann 1
The workers, united, can never be defeated...

The violence that erupted across the North East after the killings on Newcastle Town Moor was at first indiscriminate and undirected. The sheer fury of it had stunned everyone. The major problem for the government in responding was that although it had begun with a rail strike, and indeed that strike was still going on, it seemed no longer to be a factor in the disturbances. Rioters made no demands, indeed there seemed on the face of things to be no group in a position to make demands.

In a meeting with employers in August, Askwith was pessimistic.
We are sitting on a powder keg. The army is sorely stretched and in Ireland we may yet see more trouble. If trouble on the scale we have seen should break out again, I am not convinced it could be contained.
Although he had not initiated the violence Tom Mann and other activists were now in hiding trying to avoid arrest under the Emergency Powers Act. Mann surfaced briefly from time to time to address meetings but always without advance warning and always with a strong guard. Wherever he did appear he was always given a rapturous reception.

In his speeches he was always careful to avoid explicit calls to violence, stressing instead the need for collective action by workers. He would frequently point however to the success of Unionists in Ulster in organising themselves for self-defence and repeatedly urged the creation of local self defence groups to protect communities against police and army attacks and to take over policing duties for themselves. In one speech in Leeds in September (later published in the form of a handbill and widely distributed) he said:
Is this government concerned for the working man? No - they treat us as less than human, like Mr Wells' Morlocks. We are not judged equally as human beings before God, let alone before the law.
Mr Carson raises a private army and how does the government respond? It does nothing!
I publish a leaflet reminding soldiers that they are also sons of workers and ask them not to shoot their brothers and sisters and how does the government respond? It locks me up and shoots down men and women attempting to defend themselves against the violence of the state. It locks up anyone who dissents.
Mr Carson says he would rather be ruled by the German Emperor than by other Irishmen and what does the government do? It does nothing?
I say to you we have no need of rulers, that no man should rule any life but his own and what does the government do? It locks up the publishers and breaks the presses and burns the leaflets.
Mr Churchill says it is the destiny of the British to rule over a glorious empire. I say to you there is no glory in Empire. It is not glorious to shoot down your fellow man in the name of Empire.
It is not glorious.
The work of government should be the work of free men, acting together of their own volition, not imposed in the name of Empire. We can accept our subservient past or we can make our own future. A future without masters, without oppression, where men and women live free lives. A future where working men are not tricked into violence against their own.
At the May-Day celebration in London last year, when it was estimated that no less than 40,000 were gathered together in Hyde Park, the capitalist press were disappointed in being able to report a single instance of drunkenness or disorderly conduct. The capitalists are more afraid of these silent, earnest multitudes than of the old-time rioters. For they suggest the possibility of organisation – and organisation is the one thing that the capitalist dreads, more even than the Ballot box.
His syndicalist perspective was not popular everywhere of course. The leaders of the Craft unions in particular could see their power base being eroded daily and proved happy to collaborate with employers and government officials in denouncing the local Defence Committees and worker takeovers of municipal water and gas works appearing across the North East.

Again however Mann had a blunt response, once more widely distributed through clandestine presses.
Sectional unionism is our curse. The ability to act trade by trade, occupation by occupation, each independent of the other, may have been of some service a couple of generations ago. But it is of no use now! I saw in Australia, mounted police carefully conveyed a distance of fourteen hundred miles by enginemen, guards, linesmen, etc., each of whom belonged to his particular trade union. The supplies for these policemen, with their horses and carbines, swords, revolvers and baggage were all handled by Union men. And here is the astounding paradox! These same Union men were subscribing given sums per week to help the Broken Hill miners to carry on the fight, While Actually Engaged in Entrenching and Supplying the Enemy.
We can now see this happening here, in our own country, everyday. We see blacklegs, police and soldiers with all their necessary food, liquor, bedding etc., etc., being shipped and conveyed over hundreds of miles by rail and road, as well as water, by Union men. It is these Union men, and not the capitalists who beat the other Unionists trying to resist reduction or obtain increases. And so it must continue until we can organise by Industry and not by Trade, until we can unify the Industrial Movement into one compact fighting force.
Comrades! We have come to a parting of the ways. It is no longer possible for us to continue as we have – that is to say as we were 80 years ago. We must not go out to meet the Maxim with a blunderbuss! The discontent which has been spreading during the past year or two seems at last likely to break out into rebellion. The spirit which provokes the rebellion needs encouraging and so does the intelligence to direct it.
Can we think that the Masters have sat still all these years while the membership of the Unions has been growing? We know that they have not. We know from the evidence of recent strikes that the complexities of modern industry have aided the organisation of the Masters to defeat us. We have fought, and some have died, for the acquisition of trifling concessions that have made precious little difference in our lives and no difference whatever in our complete subjugation to the Master class. And while we hesitate the Trust is growing about us. Today the small manufacturer is doomed. Every year the big men get fewer and bigger. Every year the organisation of the Masters is automatically simplified against us.
Slowly but surely it is coming to be realised in the Labour Movement that Sectional Unionism is played out; that economic organisation is more than merely helpful to the attainment of better conditions; that it is not only a means, but the chief means, whereby progress can be made.
Our French comrades have already learnt this hard lesson. They have eliminated the antagonisms and sectional craft interests, and they have proved by their behaviour that they dare fight and know how to fight. They are, for the most part, anti-patriotic and anti-militarist. They are “non” not “anti” Parliamentarians. They favour resorting, when advisable to the General Strike.
They declare themselves revolutionary. But while working for the Revolution they do not neglect to do all possible to secure general betterment. They declare that the workers have no country and are not prepared to fight in the interests of a bureaucracy but most distinctly are prepared to fight for the overthrow of Capitalism – in France and elsewhere.
Comrades – what should this movement that is now appearing in Britain be like?
It must be avowedly and clearly Revolutionary in aim and method.
Revolutionary in aim, because it will be out for the abolition of the wages system and for securing to the workers the full fruits of their labour, thereby seeking to change the system of society from Capitalist to Socialist.
Revolutionary in method, because it will refuse to enter into any long agreement with the masters, whether with legal or State backing or merely voluntary; and because it will seize every chance of fighting for the general betterment – gaining ground and never losing any.
The State is essentially a ruling class organisation and its functions are chiefly coercive. The State came into existence with the rise of private property and a privileged class; its main functions have always been the protection of upper class property and of the keeping of the masses in subjection.
There is now a movement abroad for the State ownership of the railways. The railwaymen do not appear inclined to grow wildly enthusiastic about the proposal. It is perhaps as well that they do not as it will save them from going through a process of disillusionment later on. As the conflict between capital and labour becomes keener, the workers are having impressed up on them the real character and functions of the existing State.
The State, which now sends British soldiers and police to protect blacklegs and to bludgeon British workers who are fighting for their bare rights to existence can hardly be expected to inspire the workers with much confidence as to its intentions as an employer of labour. The lesson of recent days where strikers have been forced to return to work or threatened with all the penalties of military law under the Emergency Powers Act has not been lost on the British railwayman.
It is of little use to have Board of Trade officials like Mr Askwith roaming around, ever anxious to secure peace, sweet peace, at any price to the workers. The Board of Trade is a Government Department. The Government is in essence, and in detail, the machine of the Plutocracy, through which and by which they keep the workers in subjection.No Board of Trade official dare do anything to advance the interests of the men.
A State owned Railway would be no more than a Government Department. For any man to imagine that a Government Department may be seeking to do anything that will facilitate the overthrow of the ruling class is to declare himself a fool; and the converse of this is that Government Departments are extending their sphere of influence even to the extent of obtaining a controlling power over the workmen's own organisations in the interest of the capitalist class. To 'tie the workers down,' that is their work. The worker cannot secure what good sense demands unless he can show fight. The wily employing class knows this, and to be able to say they will leave the matter in the hands of a public official, as though that were not the same thing as keeping it in their own hands, suits them exactly.
“Unite” was Marx's advice long ago, but we have never properly acted upon it. Now is the time to do it, and we will do it right here in Britain. We will lead them a devil of a dance and show that there is life and courage in the workers of the British Isles.
Those who are asleep had better wake up or they'll be kicked out of the way. Those who say it can't be done had better stand out of the way and look on while it is being done.
 
Top