You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
alternatehistory.com
I'm looking at building a slightly different American Motors Corporation (AMC) based around Chicago. It certainly wouldn't be a challenger in size to any of the Big Three, I was thinking of it more as the Big Three and, then, AMC behind them. The bare bones of it is
Thomas Jeffery buys a Chicago based firm rather than the Sterling Bicycle Company up in Kenosha.
Former General Motors president Charles W. Nash buys the company and renames it Nash Motors after himself.
Packard purchases Studebaker out of receivership when it goes bankrupt for nine months in 1933.
Nash merge with Kelvinator to form Nash-Kelvinator Corporation, household goods production concentrated Grand Rapids.
Purchase of Hudson Motor Car Company and formation of American Motors Corporation.
Military contracts are concentrated at former Hudson site in Detroit, car production moved to Chicago.
AMC merges with Packard-Studebaker, car production moved to Chicago. To curry political favour South Bend plant remains open with truck and military production - M113 APC, Humvee, Bradley IFV etc. - there.
International Harvester purchased at some point.
Kaiser Jeep purchased by AMC, production remains in Toledo.
I do however have several question and I know that we have a number of motor enthusiasts around here. Would Nash be as willing to buy the company if it's not in Detroit? My general idea was for Packard to use Studebaker as a more mass market to avoid the 120 and taking the brand downmarket. The 120 worked however by being able to offer the prestige of the Packard name at a cheaper price, would Studebaker's be able to sell as well? If not Pierce-Arrow is a possible sacrificial lamb to see them through. The general line-up was going to be AMC building the smaller compact sized vehicles, Packard the full-size prestige ones, and a full-sized mass market marque between them. With AMC and Packard at the two opposite ends where do people see Studebaker and Hudson sitting on the scale relatively speaking?