Huh, I wonder why the Don whites didn't attack while the Siberian offensive was underway?
Did the Soviets keep an adequate force behind to prevent that sort of thing or were the Don Whites simply not ready for a large offensive manuver?
 
Great to see some action again; it’s been a while since we’ve seen major events that change the international situation.



So the Russian Communists are no longer waiting for socialist revolutions in the west, and instead hope to have more luck in the more backward, underdeveloped societies of Asia? Of course, that’s basically what happened IOTL, even though it wasn’t in accordance with Marxist orthodoxy at the time.

China ITTL is in a much better position, but it’s still mostly a feudal, agrarian society. IOTL the Soviets had good relation with the Kuomintang government, and didn’t want to endanger this relationship by supporting the Chinese Communists too much. ITTL the Soviets won’t have any reason to hold back, so unless the Chinese government is willing to do some kind of land reform, I could see the Communists (at least the Jiaxing faction) fermenting peasant rebellions, backed by the Soviets.

Though the Soviets themselves could have some problems in the future too. Not only has their conquest of Siberia alarmed the other powers, I also wonder if the Communist-Anarchist alliance in Russia can last, especially now that Trotsky, who doesn’t strike me as a fan of Anarchism, has become much more powerful. I foresee serious power struggles within Russia in the near future.

Regarding the relations between Soviet Russia and Germany, I think while the Germans are no great fans of the Communists, they are probably nonetheless quite happy about the fact that Russia is divided – a situation that they couldn’t have predicted in their wildest dreams prior to WW1, and which wouldn’t have been possible without the Communists. Of course, they don’t want them to become too strong either, especially not with the possibility of someone like Trotsky in charge.


I also wonder about the long-term prospects of the current Sino-Japanese alliance. IOTL, Germany and Japan were latecomers on the geopolitical stage, and tried to assert themselves in a world that had already been conquered by the other, more established great powers. This process found its conclusion in two world wars, which resulted in the subjugation of both countries by the older powers, and their integration into a world order led by the US. ITTL, Germany has accomplished its ambitions (for the most part), while Japan didn’t get much out of WW1 other than a bunch of islands in the Pacific. IOTL it kind of made sense for Japan to covet China, since it was not only large and rich in resources, but also the only Asian country that wasn’t a western colony or protectorate (well, other than Thailand, I guess).

While ITTL Japan has good relations with China, I wonder if they’ll start to have misgivings if China appears to become too strong. They might fear that they’ll eventually become the junior partner, which is certainly not what they had in mind. I could see them try to convince China to join an economic block in East Asia, hoping to establish economic dominance over China that way. Of course, who knows what happens when the current Japanese Emperor dies and his new heir takes over.

I was getting a bit tired of having to pull everything through to the same status quo as well, so this section really helped breath some life back into my writing when I was getting back into it.

As mentioned in Update 25, Trotsky in particular has become a big promoter of shifting the revolutionary focus towards Asia. While there were some hopes of urging on wider European communist revolutions initially, the lack of subsequent collapses after Italy largely disillusioned many in Soviet Russia. It is also worth noting that Red Russia has been drifting away from Marxist Orthodoxy for quite a while and that the Communist movement has come to include both the urban-focused Marxist outlook and the rural-focus of the SRs and Anarchists.

Are you sneaking a peak at my notes? :p Seriously, you have a lot of great speculation in here which aligns with a lot of my own thoughts on how events might proceed and some of the key dynamics to bear in mind as I was working on the subsequent period. We will be getting a deeper look into the Jiaxing Communists and Asian Communism in general next Sunday, but I can say that the Jiaxing Communists are going to be rural in focus for the most part. We are going to see considerable shifts in the political dynamics of the Soviet Republic as we move forward with Trotsky the main impetus of these changes.

Your read on the German outlook is once again pretty spot on. They are not happy about the Siberian expansion, but maintain their relations and are deeply worried by the growing power and authority of Trotsky moving forward.

The Sino-Japanese relationship is going to be critical to how events play out in East Asia and will be a pretty key dynamic for a long time to come.

Huh, I wonder why the Don whites didn't attack while the Siberian offensive was underway?
Did the Soviets keep an adequate force behind to prevent that sort of thing or were the Don Whites simply not ready for a large offensive manuver?

As mentioned, the army invading Siberia is made up primarily of soldiers from Yekaterinburg lands, basically the entirety of the Muscovite forces are still prepared to counter any attack by the Don Whites. Additionally, the Don White are still trying to crawl out of the hole they were left in after the Russian Civil War and the prospect of restarting the civil war basically has next to no support. The Don is exceedingly reliant on foreign protection at this time, particularly German protection, so they are really not in a position where they can contest Red Russia.
 
Since the TL will soon reach its tenth anniversary since the end of the Great War, how about a rough overview of the military and geopolitical situation ITTL?

I would imagine that the defense budgets of all the major powers are bigger than they were IOTL during this time, since the German army and navy haven’t been gutted, and there are no restrictions imposed on Germany, meaning that France and Britain most likely didn’t disarm nearly to the same extent as they did IOTL.

With that in mind, how would the armies and navies of the major powers compare at this point in time? To make it simple, let’s assign numerical values to the strengths of the various militaries.

Let’s take naval forces, for example. If Britain’s navy (still the world’s largest at this point, I assume) is a 10, then what number would Germany’s navy have? What about Japan? The same for armies. A high number not only means a high number of soldiers, tanks or ships, but also a high level of technology. Since this is a comparison of the relative strengths of the different powers, the strongest force automatically gets a 10.

For example:

Britain: Navy 10, Army 3
Germany: Navy 5, Army 10
France: Navy 4, Army 7
USA: Navy 5, Army 3
Japan: Navy 5, Army 6

Those numbers are just my examples, but you get my idea. So, how would those numbers look at this point in time for the major powers (Britain, Germany, France, USA, Soviet Russia, Japan, China, Ottomans)?
 
Since the TL will soon reach its tenth anniversary since the end of the Great War, how about a rough overview of the military and geopolitical situation ITTL?

I would imagine that the defense budgets of all the major powers are bigger than they were IOTL during this time, since the German army and navy haven’t been gutted, and there are no restrictions imposed on Germany, meaning that France and Britain most likely didn’t disarm nearly to the same extent as they did IOTL.

With that in mind, how would the armies and navies of the major powers compare at this point in time? To make it simple, let’s assign numerical values to the strengths of the various militaries.

Let’s take naval forces, for example. If Britain’s navy (still the world’s largest at this point, I assume) is a 10, then what number would Germany’s navy have? What about Japan? The same for armies. A high number not only means a high number of soldiers, tanks or ships, but also a high level of technology. Since this is a comparison of the relative strengths of the different powers, the strongest force automatically gets a 10.

For example:

Britain: Navy 10, Army 3
Germany: Navy 5, Army 10
France: Navy 4, Army 7
USA: Navy 5, Army 3
Japan: Navy 5, Army 6

Those numbers are just my examples, but you get my idea. So, how would those numbers look at this point in time for the major powers (Britain, Germany, France, USA, Soviet Russia, Japan, China, Ottomans)?

I don't really think that is a salient approach to ranking powers given that there are so many different aspects to take into consideration. There are plans for a workup of military technology and thinking possibly as an interlude/insight update, but at this moment it doesn't feel super relevant to go into detail about a lot of this stuff. With some of the individual conflicts coming up there are breakdowns of these sorts of things, but they are constantly shifting and changing. When it becomes relevant I will address these things.

I tried to do a bit of a breakdown, but it really does not make sense given how many different factors are involved and the direction of the TL moving forward and I am not even sure how to classify a lot of these. How do I quantify an effective use of colonial military resources? What about the differences between the quality of the Home Fleet and Dominion Fleets ITTL - particularly considering the significant differences in the sorts of forces they are likely to face should it come down to an actual clash? What about a strength in mass production of relatively low-quality armored vehicles as opposed to a small but high quality armored force? There are simply too many things to take into consideration shifting depending on what front or faction you are discussing. Sorry that I can't give a better answer, but it just doesn't make sense for me to try to set things out in this manner.

The military budgets are larger ITTL and there is a greater focus on the potential for renewed warfare in Europe - meaning that we don't see quite the same narrow focus on light tanks that occurred IOTL during the 1920s for example. Military technology in general develops a bit differently. I am not really a buff on a lot of these things, but @Ombra has been helping flesh out some of these thoughts and ideas.
 
I really hope the next update will go in detail the strength of the Jiangxing Communist, how it will influence cross-border activities ;)
 
i liked this update very much, though a few questions:
is Mongolia the same size as IOTL or does include parts of inner Mongolia? i imagine they grabbed the Altai since abandoning it wastes the propaganda value of the fighting.
is Pesian Persias capital Isfahan? and will there be an update about the Ottoman Empire?
i would love one about Romanian politics and Bulgaria if you want to
also whats going on in Ireland?
 
Last edited:
i liked this update very much, though a few questions:
is Mongolia the same size as IOTL or does include parts of inner Mongolia? i imagine they grabbed the Altai since abandoning it wastes the propaganda value of the fighting.
is Pesian Persias capital Isfahan? and will there be an update about the Ottoman Empire?
i would love one about Romanian politics and Bulgaria if you want to
also whats going on in Ireland?

I am happy to hear you enjoyed it.

To answer your questions, Mongolia has around the land mass of OTL during this period, they retreat out of the Russian Altai together with the Whites under Kutepov. Following the fall of the Siberian Whites, it has become a wholly Chinese subject, although whether that state of affairs will hold in the long run is another matter.

Pessian Persia's capital is in Kerman but Mashad is as, if not more, important in many ways due to its large size and important religious position in Shia Islam.

Update 32 has an in-depth look at what has been going on in the Balkans covering Romania, Bulgaria, Greece and the Ottoman Empire in quite a bit of detail.

Ireland is a troubled island but for the most part it remains peaceful and under British rule. There is a lot of seething resentment under the surface, but the bloody suppression of the Irish revolutionaries during the first half of the 1920s has quelled the situation for the time being.
 
Interesting update, the tsarist government doesn't have enough to survive without international help. Although communist Russia got bigger it still does not have the baku and tampo Ukraine camps, without that they are still not strong enough to fight against Germany.
 
Great chapter. Poor Olga. I expected it but still...

Honestly, press F to pay respects. I was so sad reading it myself, truly a tragic way for this to end. At least she got a small, quiet funerary rite after her death.

ITTL the Soviets won’t have any reason to hold back, so unless the Chinese government is willing to do some kind of land reform, I could see the Communists (at least the Jiaxing faction) fermenting peasant rebellions, backed by the Soviets.

That sounds like an interesting dynamic, doesn't it? Another consideration imho is the pushback. We've been discussing what impact is going to result from a greater communist focus on Asia and a stronger, more assertive China - but what about both in combination? I.E. when China is powerful, assertive, *and* feels under threat from communism and its northern neighbour?
The map of international rifts and centers of political gravity ITTL is shaping up to be so different from the one we had OTL.

Regarding the relations between Soviet Russia and Germany, I think while the Germans are no great fans of the Communists, they are probably nonetheless quite happy about the fact that Russia is divided – a situation that they couldn’t have predicted in their wildest dreams prior to WW1, and which wouldn’t have been possible without the Communists. Of course, they don’t want them to become too strong either, especially not with the possibility of someone like Trotsky in charge.

Of course, Russia right now is nowhere near as disunited as it was after the Great War. Now naturally, no Finland, no Baltics, no Poland, and especially no Ukraine, no Caucasus and no Don makes for some painful losses, and greatly degrades the Russian strategic position compared to 1914... but it's a massive Russian revival after the low of the mid-20s. That doesn't mean relations are condemned to deteriorate. ITTL, Germany and Russia do not have the same feeling of kinship they have of being two pariah states of the Versailles order - but it was Germany that first allowed Moscow to break out of political isolation, Germany that negotiated Tsarskoye Selo, and of course both Russia and Germany have a long history of ambivalence and frequently switching between cooperation and competition dating to well before the Great War. But military planners, obviously, cannot ignore this.

With that in mind, how would the armies and navies of the major powers compare at this point in time? To make it simple, let’s assign numerical values to the strengths of the various militaries.

@Zulfurium has already given you a comprehensive answer, but since I was tagged, I wanted to pitch in. Any defence force - be it an army, a navy, an air force etc - is a tool. Whether it's a good tool or not is entirely dependent on which goals it is supposed to accomplish and its ability to meet them. Those goals are typically set by the political leadership - and they are not all military in nature. Domestic and foreign policy come into consideration as well.
Many things complicate this picture. People drew radically different conclusions from their experience in the Great War, and need to apply them to the battlefields they are expecting to find themselves in. With a Franco-German border that is wooded, rugged, and stretches from the fortress of Liege to the killzones in front of the A-L fortifications, France is going to look at its defence needs very differently from Soviet Russia, just to mention the subject of the last update. And that's if we just stick to the strategy side. Doctrine, logistics and equipment are all the result of a much more complicated (and sometimes incoherent) process that is political as much as it is military.

Let's take the German Kaiserliche Marine, which is probably my favourite example. It sat out virtually the entire war, couldn't stop the blockade, and didn't exactly cover itself in glory at Jutland. This after it arguably contributed a significant amount to presenting Germany with a near-insurmountable strategic situation against the nightmare "Crimean coalition" Germany was supposed to avoid. Some might - rightfully - take the view that the KM needs to be seriously de-prioritised. The money being freed up this way can be used elsewhere, and the KM can shift its emphasis over time to a guerre de course/commerce raiding force that operates in close proximity with land-based naval aviation and submarines to harry any blockading force in the North Sea.

On the other end, the proponents of a strong battlefleet are drawing entirely different lessons from the Great War - for example that the KM was not employed properly because the leadership was too timid. Their position will be that, had the KM sailed in 1914 to support the army in its race to the sea, it could have wreaked a lot of havoc and justified its existence (and btw, they are correct in this limited sense!). Then there is of course the fact that navies are a matter of prestige, and that with no Washington Naval Treaty or equivalent ITTL, the risk of falling behind is very real.

Finally, there will be those who argue against strategy #1 as too focused on the North Sea and too obviously aimed against Britain, potentially alarming it and producing a tool that is inflexible for different strategic situations, but are equally critical of #2 as a repetition of the folly of the past, and argue instead for a fleet of long-legged battlecruisers and escort carriers to project power away from Germany's shores and defend its colonial empire.

There is also a different strategic dimension in that the role of the Mediterranean in German planning has acquired a whole new complexity after the Anschluss, but this is something best left to future updates, where it will be covered extensively.

Which strategy is right, or wrong? Giving a straightforward answer is not easy, especially since you would need to define which interests take priority to you, and how your choices are going to influence other players around you (how will Britain react to your own ship-laying schedule? Etc). Now, in this race for funds, approval, and more often than not personal career advancement, there is domestic politics making things even more complicated. Sure, the KM is expensive, but on a domestic level, it's just so cool - or so many Germans think. It's a federal institution, which is still not true of the army at this point ITTL, one that allows servicemen to feel well and truly German (the air force is federal as well, but it will take a few more years for it to truly enter the national consciousness). It's a huge economic engine and it keeps many firms and workers in business. And it's immensely popular with all sorts of lobby groups and colonial administration. Anyone considering cutbacks to the KM will have to take into account the way this is going to impact public opinion and electoral (as well as informal political) support.

Hopefully this answer explains in which direction you should be viewing this. It's true that the strategic picture is significantly different from OTL. But judging who's sitting pretty and who's not is much harder than it sounds, even (or especially) for the ITTL people involved.
 
Update Twenty-Nine (Pt. 2): The Victorious Red Banner
The Victorious Red Banner

%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%B1%E5%85%AD%E5%B1%8A%E5%85%AD%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%A8%E4%BC%9A%E4%B8%BB%E5%B8%AD%E5%9B%A2%E6%88%90%E5%91%98%E5%90%88%E5%BD%B1.jpg

Jiaxing Party Leadership at a Party Conference in the Countryside

Asian Communism​

Events in Russia were to have a profound impact on the development of Japanese Communism at the turn of the decade as admiration of Trotsky and his theories resonated powerfully not only with Kita Ikki's own ideological framework but with the wider militant spirit of the Japanese people. Kita Ikki had already been an avid reader of Trotsky's writings prior to the Fall of Siberia, but with the demonstrated efficacy of the Trotskyite model he made the decision to begin to draw ever more heavily on Trotsky for inspiration. Speeches came to be littered with Trotsky's quotes on the importance of a militant revolutionary spirit to ensuring the success of the revolution, the need for a permanent international revolution which would allow the cause to eventually sweep across the world while also adopting an emphasis on approaching any societal challenge like a military campaign, harkening back to Japan's own history under the Shoguns to provide a familiar framing for these concepts.

All of these elements came to feature heavily in Kita Ikki's own writings and as a result began to crop up in stump speeches by Nippon Kyosanto politicians from one end of Japan to the other as he gradually ascended to a preeminent position as Nippon Kyosanto's ideological centre. It was during this time that Kita Ikki's writings first began to circulate more widely amongst younger army officers, particularly those of less elite origins, alongside various other radical writings, mostly of a far-right extraction. Here, Kita Ikki's decision to build on Trotsky's theories would prove vital in promoting the spread of Communist ideology into the military academies and amongst their recent graduates - a movement which would grow unabated as a result of the Army's own willingness to ignore the politicisation of their officers towards far-right ultra nationalism and an inability to comprehend the development of support for Communism within the Army itself, resulting in a neglectful censorship effort within their own ranks. Of particular importance would be Kita Ikki's success in securing the following of the recently dismissed Captain Nishida Mitsugi and Lieutenant Hashimoto Kingoro, who held positions of informal importance amongst the younger officers of the Imperial Japanese Army.

Nippon Kyosanto was to experience considerable growth in the years following Siberia's fall under Yamakawa Hitoshi's political stewardship, with particularly the merging of the Rodonominto and Nippon Kyosanto organisations requiring competent management and organisation talent given the tensions which had emerged in the relationships between the two parties and their leaders during their multi-year conflict. This normalisation of relations would be accomplished successfully for the most part through Yamakawa's graciousness in victory, giving positions of power and authority within the party to Fukumoto Kazou and Nosaka Sanzo and other prominent ex-Nippon Kyosanto members, most importantly giving Nosaka the task of further developing the party's economic reform platform and passing the task of managing relations with the international revolutionary movement to Fukumoto. However, despite these efforts there would remain significant tensions within the party leadership - particularly between Nosaka Sanzo and Kita Ikki, with Nosaka regarding Kita as little better than a reactionary faux-revolutionary and Kita viewing Nosaka as a foreign shill, willing to sell out Japan to the western imperialists should it allow him greater political prominence.

It was also during this time that the decision was made within the party leadership to work towards developing ties with Rikken Minseito with an eye toward becoming part of the accepted political establishment in a move greatly criticised by Kita Ikki, who felt it a betrayal of the unique role he believed Nippon Kyosanto to hold as the Vanguard of the Japanese People, the Nihonjin no Zen'ei, a term which featured strongly in Kita's writings on the purpose of the party. A contentious topic within both Nippon Kyosanto and Rikken Minseito, Prime Minister Yamamoto Gonbee remained exceedingly cautious towards these feelers. However, Kyosanto was able to meet with greater success with others in the party and naval establishment, most significantly in the form of Yamamoto's own son-in-law and Minister of the Navy, Takarabe Takeshi, and Admiral Hori Teikichi, who would bring his proteges Yamamoto Isoroku, Inoue Shigeyoshi and Yonai Mitsumasa into this leftist clique of the Navy. Within Minseito itself, the Communists were to find a number of allies including the influential Saito Takao and his clique of supporters, the diplomat Yoshida Shigeru, Isu Abe and most significantly the youthful and charismatic Adachi Kenzo. As Nippon Kyosanto pushed forward into the new decade, they slowly but steadily found their base of support growing and increasingly found themselves accepted by important segments of the political establishment (12).

The division of Chinese Communism into Shanghai and Jiaxing factions would prove to be amongst the most important developments in China during this period, creating a crucial and long-lasting source of division and tension in a political movement already under immense pressure. For the Shanghai Communists, this division was to lead them steadily further away from the mainstream movements of Communism, finding inspiration elsewhere on the international left as they found themselves increasingly ostracised by other parties and movements on the far-left. Perhaps the single most important event in the early ideological development of the Shanghai Communists was to come in early 1928 when the translation of a series of articles, theoretical papers, reports and party platform of the German Social Democratic Party were completed and published anonymously under the pen name of Li De, later discovered to be the work of a lapsed German Communist by the name of Otto Braun, who had drifted into the orbit of the SPD in recent years and been dispatched to China after demonstrating a remarkable capability for languages. These writings, which included a detailed description of the work done under Friedrich Ebert on the Prussian Welfare State, the role of national pride in the German social democratic tradition, the powerful vehicle which the state represented, the necessity of democratic rule and institutions as well as the importance of pushing towards a socialist society through reform rather than revolution, were all to find fertile ground in a political movement which had already absorbed a good portion of the Kuomintang's left wing.

As a result, Shanghai Communism increasingly began to resemble a social democratic movement rather than an outright communist movement over the course of the late 1920s and 1930s. The first, and possibly most meaningful, demonstration of this shifting ideological foundation was to make itself felt in the dispatch of Red Guard forces to aid in the Altai Mountains Campaign, but were soon followed by a series of legislative initiatives in the National Congress aimed at strengthening the Chinese state's capacity to aid and protect its citizens. Ambitious educational reforms which would revitalize the collapsed Imperial bureaucracy were proposed by Wang Jingwei, and were eventually passed into law after some modification, and a Board of Mediation was established in Shanghai in 1929 to manage negotiations between employers, unions and the government - an effort led by Liao Zhongkai and clearly modeled on northern European three-party negotiations system which sought to regulate employer-employee relations and reduce class-based strife.

However, it is important to note that not everyone was equally happy about these shifts and the matter was far from clear cut for the first years of the divide. Constant clashes with the Jiaxing Communists, first in writing and debate but later in blood, and anger at the forceful entry of ex-Kuomintang figures into the party posed major challenges to the party and led to persistent factional infighting within the Shanghai Communists which would only really begin to sort themselves out near the middle of the 1930s. Nevertheless, the example set by the Shanghai Communists was to leave an avenue for left-wing thought and expression within the otherwise firmly right-wing Fengtian regime which helped alleviate some of the popular pressure upon the government and redirected many of the urban poor in particular away from violent opposition to the government (13).

In sharp contrast to the Shanghai Communists, their rivals the Jiaxing Communists found themselves constantly under threat from the authorities. While the Shanghai Communists found their centre of support in Shanghai and the surrounding cities on the Yangtze where they would eventually be allowed to stand for office as well, the Jiaxing Communists were to prove a predominantly southern Chinese movement led primarily by young firebrands such as Zhou Enlai, Zhang Guotao, Mao Zedong, Li Lisan, Cai Hesen, Chen Tanqiu, He Shuheng and the two military men Lin Biao and He Long. These men operated a wide net of contacts and supporters across the south in the post-KMT period leading up to the Jiangning Rebellion and worked to develop a popular Communist movement in the region. During the chaos of the Jiangning Rebellion, these men were able to significantly strengthen their authority by working as peace-keepers in the towns, cities and villages of southern China, fighting off warlord bands and maintaining public services, in the process gaining a great deal of renown and recognition in the region.

The subsequent banning of the Communist Party outside Shanghai therefore came as a brutal body blow to these ambitious young men, who suddenly found their movement outlawed and themselves in an increasingly precarious position, even as their less ideologically rigorous comrades departed for Shanghai in search of safety from prosecution. This period would see a significant hardening of attitudes amongst the Jiaxing Communists, culminating in the 1927 Communist National Congress arranged by Zhou Enlai, Mao Zedong and Hu Shuheng at which the Shanghai Communists were censured as traitors to the revolution and moved to expel the Shanghai leadership from the Communist Party, although this second motion would fail in the face reluctance to shatter the party entirely.

Over the course of the next two years, relations between the two factions steadily degenerated until 1929 when an assassination attempt was made on Wang Jingwei by a Jiaxing Communist known to be part of Zhang Guotai's clique of supporters turned the conflict violent. This marked the first shot in what quickly proved a stunningly bloody party conflict which would last well into the 1930s and saw men such as Chan Tanqiu, Wu Yuzhang and the prominent Communist ideologue Xu Teli, who was a teacher to Mao Zedong and Cai Hesen, killed. Xu Teli himself was killed in retaliation for the murder of Li Dazhao, a founder of the Communist Party, member of the National Congress and leader of the Shanghai Communists at the hands of a murder squad led by Cai Hesen in 1933, itself an act of revenge for Li Dazhao's unwillingness to save Cai's wife Xiang Jingyu from execution after she was caught in the French Concession in Shanghai (14).

This state of open conflict within the Communist Party was to make the Jiaxing Communists amongst the most militant in the world, with Chinese militants making up a majority of the men trained by the Yekaterinburg Trotskyites between 1925 and 1929. The result was a ideological framework which took Trotsky's and Nestor Makhno's ideologies of militant self-sufficiency and peasant-oriented communal structures and blended them with preexisting trends in the Chinese Communist movement. With the Jiaxing Communists increasingly driven from the coastal cities, they instead turned to the countryside where they were able to develop a powerful base of support, building self-reliant communes which rejected government authority and worked in consort to ensure each others' safety and security. Given the limited and fragmented authority of the Fengtian Government in the south, and the fact that what resources they had were dedicated to eradicating the last remnants of the Jiangning Rebels, these peasant communes were largely allowed to grow and expand unmolested for much of the 1920s, few realising that they were an outgrowth of the Communist movement.

The Fall of Siberia changed all of this, as the threat posed by Communism emerged as a primary concern of the Fengtian government, resulting in a series of repressive measures in the coastal cities which drove the last of the Jiaxing Communists into the countryside where they soon turned their attentions towards educating the peasantry on their rights and role in the international revolutionary movement. The Jiaxing Communists would largely go unnoticed by the government until June of 1931 when a series of clashes between tax collectors and the peasant communes brought the issue to awareness with the local government in Guangxi and led to the militarisation of tax collection, the government seemingly unaware that these communes had spread across most of Guangxi, Guangdong, Yunan, Guizhou and Hunan. The result was an armed clash between tax collectors and local Commune Militias which began to slowly spin out of control. The remainder of 1931 would see the steady growth of popular unrest as arms missed in the government's weapons collection programme and looted from district and county armories were brought out to resist tax collectors (15).

The communist movement in India was extraordinarily diffuse and, in its early stages, riven by divisions. At heart, this could be attributed to the way in which communism on a larger scale first made its inroads in India following the start of the Russian Revolution. One important avenue of Communist influence came about as a result of the Khilafat movement's dispatch of volunteer fighters to fight in defence of the Ottoman Empire against the British, which eventually saw them influenced by the Russian Reds they came into contact with in the lead-up to and during the Russian Civil War. Travelling back to India through Communist influenced and controlled areas, there were many Muslims who found themselves impacted by their experiences of the revolutionary state.

A second vector came about through the rapid industrialization which had occurred during the Great War, and the resultant growth of a poor and repressed urban and industrial proletariat. As the financial shocks of the early 1920s, the Swaraj Movement and various other politically divisive events played out, the discontent within this group of people grew rapidly. In 1920, the All-India Trade Union Congress was founded under powerful socialist influence, beginning the development of what was to become a powerful trade union movement connected to both the Swaraj and Communist movements.

Worried about the rapid growth of communist sentiments even as they involved themselves deeper in the fighting of the Russian Civil War, the British Colonial Authorities began to make various counter-moves to resolve the issue. A fatwa was declared against communism in early 1920, soon followed by the establishment of a special colonial office to monitor communist influence while a ban on all imports of communist, socialist and anarchist literature was imposed. 1924 would see the first attempt at unity within the wider communist movement in India in the form of formation of the Communist Party of India by the revolutionary Manabendra Nath Roy and a number of others, most prominently Shaukat Usmani, Ghulam Hussain and Shripad Amrit Dange, in Bombay. While these party leaders would largely lead their factions semi-independently across the vast Indian Subcontinent, the formation of the Communist Party of India allowed for the creation of a united party platform drawing primarily on the Muscovite Communist movement for inspiration.

This decision, alongside the decision to work with the various independence movements, were to tie the Communists of India directly to the wider struggle for independence, particularly with the Swaraj Party and their Muslim Independence Party allies. Most notably, the communists made contacts with the Anushilans and Jugantars, violent revolutionary groups in the Bengal, and came to serve as independent middle men between the Swaraj Party and the violent revolutionaries on the few occasions they decided to work in concert.

The late 1920s would see a series of four major conspiracy trials against the Communist movement, the most significant of which would prove to be the Kaunpur Communist Conspiracy Case which saw all of the Communist Party's leaders indicted on charges of fomenting revolution. Luckily for the Communists, none of the party leaders were captured in the initial attempt at capturing them, and they would soon make their escape abroad, travelling to Moscow where they were warmly welcomed and supported in the maintenance of their movement at a distance. While M.N. Roy would struggle with the decision to rely on foreign powers for protection, he would ultimately remain the leader of the party and steadily began to consolidate his position amongst the exiles, even as within India word of the conquest of Siberia provoked a surge in recruitment for the communists.

In the meanwhile, the Communist Movement in India proper was left to develop without much in the way of guidance or unity - resulting in the proliferation of various communist groups and movements of varying violence and legitimacy, some connecting to the independence movements and anti-colonial struggle while others saw themselves as part of a world revolution aimed at uniting the entire globe under a single universal communist government. Ideological orthodoxy proved next to impossible to maintain and while the declarations issued from Moscow by M.N. Roy and the Communist Party leadership would hold an important role in the actions of the varied communist movement, they were viewed less as orders and directives and more as suggestions for internal debate and discussion (16).

Footnotes:

(12) Japanese Communism is beginning to really develop into its own ideological construction drawing not only on Trotskyite ideology and the will to work within a big tent coalition from the Muscovites and merging it with their own militarist, pan-Asianist and nationalism to produce a unique form of Communism. Perhaps most important to note here is the way in which the Communists are beginning to make inroads amongst the military and navy while finding allies in the political establishment. This is slowly paving the way for a the Communists entering into the political establishment themselves and becoming an accepted part of society. It should be noted that the very idea of the Communists becoming accepted in Japanese society, particularly after the fall of Siberia, is viewed as utterly repellant by the Rikken Seiyukai and the wider right-wing of Japanese politics, to say nothing of the military leadership and Crown Prince Yasuhito.

(13) Shanghai Communism really ends up abandoning a lot of its communist foundations when it declares its allegiance to the government, resulting in a period of soul searching in search of an ideological framework which can make sense of their movement's current position. This is ultimately found in German Social Democratic ideology. I know that Li De is popping up earlier than OTL and that he hasn't fallen into the Communist camp ITTL, but given the changed circumstances in Germany and a resultant weakening of the Communist movement in the country, I think there is a good argument to be made for him deciding to back the SPD rather than KPD. An important detail which this section also helps to illuminate is that the Communists are not the only left-wing movement to begin actively proselytising around the world. To my knowledge, China never really had a social democratic movement or tradition, the KMT left-wing was probably the closest and they were more in the socialist vein than social democratic, so when considering what direction the Shanghai Communist (and isn't that name going to be causing more trouble than it is worth) movement this seemed like an interesting way to go about it. The Shanghai Communists hold onto their communist label for the time being mostly out of a sense of continuity with the party established earlier in the 1920s but as we move forward and events elsewhere play out that label is going to become an increasingly contentious matter.

(14) I know there are a ton of names here, but the thing to note is that most of these are the young firebrands who IOTL guided the CCP through its early travails and eventually came to lead the party. Given the rapidly growing divide between Shanghai and Jiaxing, I don't think it is out of the realm of possibilities for their disagreements to turn bloody and as a result we see a bitter, internecine civil war within the Chinese Communist movement which leaves both sides ever more embittered and divided from each other, pushing the Jiaxing Communists into an ever more radical and militant position while the Shanghai Communists cling ever more tightly to the government and state. By the way, Cai Hesen's wife was captured and executed IOTL as well, soon to be followed by Cai Hesen himself.

(15) When I mention Makhno here, it is in reference to the work he has done organising village communes in Russia and the literature that has been written in left-wing circles about that work. With the cities denied them, the Jiaxing Communists throw everything into their rural efforts and as a result experience considerable growth - especially in the far south where minorities and marginalised populations make for a perfect source of support. This section also demonstrates the way in which the government disarmament efforts have proven of only limited success - while they got rid of most of the warlords, who they at the time saw as the problem, they largely overlooked the increasingly radical village communes which developed self-defence forces and harboured Jiaxing Communists from their enemies. IOTL the KMT government were heavily oriented towards the south and drew most of their support from that region, fighting bitterly with the factions in North China. ITTL the situation is almost exactly reversed, the government is strongest in the north and weakest in the south, which means that it is only in the 1930s that you start having things like regular taxation and government services in the region.

(16) There are a lot of similarities to what happened IOTL, but there are some key divergences to make a note of. IOTL the conspiracy cases happened far earlier - between 1921 and 1923, while here the distraction of an imploding Swaraj movement draws the focus away, allowing the Communists to build a better foundation for their movement. They end up serving as middle men between the "clean" wing of the independence movement and the "dirty/violent" wing, ensuring that there is at least some overlap in their goals. Particularly Subhas Chandra Bose plays a major role here, managing the Swaraj Party's relations with the communists and passing on messages through them to the violent revolutionaries. A second point to note is that with a much less dictatorial Communist International, the national communists aren't as alienated - most significantly meaning that M.N. Roy remains a part of the communist party. In contrast to OTL, all the major leaders also make their escape from the authorities when the conspiracy case comes up - which is a result of the greater degree of time they have had to lay down roots and build a support network, thereby buying themselves time to make an escape. It is worth noting the complete fragmentation of the far-left which follows the flight of the Communist leadership, with anyone and everyone interested in the cause taking their own leads.

496px-Don_Luigi_Sturzo_1919.jpg

Don Luigi Sturzo, Leader of the White Socialist Movement in Italy

Revolutionary Catholicism​

Italian Communism as a unified ideology only really began to find its footing as a governing framework in the aftermath of Errico Malatesta's expulsion from the party and Antonio Gramsci's subsequent entreaties to other sections of the left which had emerged as independent factions following the end of the Italian Civil War to cooperate in creating a free and equitable Italy.

The most significant of these parties was to prove the Italian People's Party founded by Don Luigi Sturzo, a Christian Democratic-Socialist party which had gone through considerable internal turmoil and division in the aftermath of the Fall of Rome and the Papacy's embrace of its most conservative forces. A former supporter of Pope Benedict and the liberal wing of the Church, he had been amongst the far-left within the clergy for years prior to the Italian Civil War. Various discoveries in the undisturbed parts of the papal archives by the Commission on the Abuses of the Catholic Church, established by the Communist Party in an effort to discredit the Church, of stories of clerical abuses, physical, emotional and sexual in various cases, and a litany of other horrors and abuses of the faithful shook popular beliefs in the Catholic Church both at home and internationally, calling into question the legitimacy of the Catholic Church and its institutions. In response to these findings, many of which horrified even the clerical community itself, would prove central to spurring on a movement aiming to reclaim the Church of Christ from the sinful abuses of the papacy. In response to these abuses, undeniable in the face of public testimonies, archival documents and much more, there emerged a push within the Italian clerical community, foremost amongst them Sturzo, for a new church purged of the horrors and abuses of the past, purified of sin and aware of its debt to the peoples of the world. While ordinarily, this growing clerical movement might well have met with opposition and suppression from the Communist Party, it would be Sturzo's personal relationship with Gramsci and their subsequent collaboration on the development of Italian Communism as an independent movement which helped to shield the Christian Democratic-Socialists, increasingly termed White Socialists, from attack.

Antonio Gramsci had never quite fit the Marxist mould of Socialism, by and large rejecting the determinism of the historical dialectic, the idea that the working classes were destined to rise to power, and the industrial prerequisites for revolution outlined by Marx had been firmly disproven by the revolutions in Russia, Central America and Italy itself, Gramsci referring to historical materialism by the disparaging term of "economism" for its narrow-minded focus on money and wages. In Gramsci's eyes, capitalism was not simply an economic system but an entire socio-cultural hegemony which convinced the working classes that their subordination to the whims and wishes of the bourgeoisie was for their own benefit. It was by challenging this hegemony through words and deeds, helping the working classes to develop their own morality and values independent of the capitalist hegemony, that it would become possible to form a true capitalist society.

To Gramsci and his followers the foundational elements of bourgeois culture rested upon religion, folk myth and legends which allowed them to shape a holistic social culture. For working class culture to achieve the same vigour, it needs to go beyond purely material question of one's wage or wealth, and address people's unquantifiable needs like spirituality, social relations and the like. Thus, where the bourgeois culture had the Catholic Church, which Gramsci admired in many ways, then the working class would need something akin to Luther's Reformation, combined with Marxist theory, to form a new socio-cultural hegemony for the working classes. This would allow the Italian socialist experiment to bypass the single greatest failure of economism in Gramsci's eyes, namely the way in which it reduced everything to the size of one's wage, where trade union leaders and political representatives, to say nothing of the working classes themselves, would simply be satisfied with improvements to their material standard of life without any greater appeal to justice, representation or equitability.

As such, Gramsci and some of his closest supporters soon came to believe that the new church structures campaigned for by the White Socialists would accomplish exactly what they were looking for in helping overturn the old hegemony, and might further become a useful vehicle for the spread of the international revolutionary cause. Having already begun to formulate some basic tenets during the Civil War, working on the basis of a call to restoring the Catholic Church to its roots, it proposed to fight poverty by addressing its source, the sin of greed, while exploring the relationship between Christian theology and political activism in the name of economic justice, poverty and human rights. It was to marry populist ideas with the social responsibility of the Catholic Church under the claim that God had been revealed to have a disproportionate interest in the poor, the marginalized, the insignificant, needy and despised. It adopted a heavy emphasis on practice over doctrine, allowing considerable leeway in the interpretation of its emergent doctrines, but always with an emphasis on condemning the oppression and injustices faced by the poor and marginalised.

Over the course of 1929, this nascent Revolutionary Catholic Church as it came to be called would find itself granted the use of some of the many church buildings confiscated by the state for their use - most of which had sat empty since their confiscation, while a thorough walkthrough of Church Canon was undertaken to shift the emphasis onto a focus more aligned with socialist values. Over the course of the early 1930s, this revolutionary theological framework would find itself spread to every church and parish in Red Italy wherefrom revolutionary ideals were now to be espoused on a foundation of both Christianity and Communism. Similarly, large new seminaries were established to recruit and train missionaries for duty internationally, where they were to spread both Christ's message of salvation and the Communist Revolution alike.

This move, so reminiscent Anarchist training camps shut down by Antonio Gramsci, would result in calls of hypocrisy and betrayal aimed at Gramsci his clear antipathy towards anarchism. The result was the formation of the Anarchist Unity Front led by Malatesta in a direct challenge to the Communist Party, which would go on to form the second largest political party in Red Italy in the aftermath of the first Italian elections held in 1930, the Italian People's Party making up the third major party affiliation in revolutionary Italy at the dawn of the 1930s (17).

The development of the Revolutionary Catholic Church did not come out of nothing. Across Latin America, particularly in Mexico and Central America, the Italians had been witness to a rapidly growing number of powerful and influential Catholic-Socialist movements, most prominently the Cristeros and Sandinistas. As a result, these countries would be amongst the very first to receive priests from the Italian seminaries, marking the early beginnings of the Catholic Communism as an international force and ideology.

In Mexico, the state had entered into an increasingly precarious balance with the end of de la Huerta's Presidency, which had resulted in the election of Manuel Antonio Romero as president. Romero, who had served as governor of Tabasco for de la Huerta and had supported him during the war with Obrégon, had emerged as one of de la Huerta's closest supporters in the period which followed the defeat of Obrégon and was part of a powerful clique of politicians connected in various ways to the radical socialist ideologue Francisco José Múgica Velázquez. This group included men like Lázaro Cárdenas of Michoacan, Salvador Alvarado Rubio of the Yucatan and General Carlos Greene, and was closely connected with Russian Communism, being fiercely opposed to de la Huerta's surrender on the issue of the Catholic Church.

As such, Romero's election was to result in a gradual hardening of attitudes towards the Catholic Church, with his fellow delahuertista governors in the south implementing steadily more stringent anti-Catholic policies, in the Yucatan even venturing over into outright closures of religious institutions and confiscation of church property alongside the murder of politically active clergy. This slowly rising current of violence was to see the Villistas, Cristeros most prominent amongst them, protest government inaction with increasing outrage, only to receive a blank response from Romero to mind their own states. Dissatisfied with the situation, the Villistas nevertheless focused their efforts in their own states, working to deal with their own internal divisions and factional disputes. These divisions stemmed from the deeply divided position of many Mexican Catholics on the emergence of the Revolutionary Catholic Church and the concurrent hardening of the conservatism of Papal Catholicism. There were many who clung wholeheartedly to the church of the papacy, but the arrival of missionaries from Italy was to set the fox amongst the hens. Having been trained vigorously in not only theology, but also rhetoric, pedagogy, social work and socialist ideology, these young firebrand preachers were to present a variation of Catholicism much more in line with the values of the Revolution, in sharp contrast to the harsh conservatism of the Papal Church, which had already begun to issue increasingly stringent guidelines on doctrine in line with integralist ideology.

Already a fertile ground for religious foment, Mexico would see a sharp divide emerge within its large and vibrant Catholic community. In many ways, the Catholicism preached by the recent Italian arrivals shared more in common with the poorer, more rural and syncretic Catholicism of Mexico than the stately, tradition-bound Catholicism of Europe. As a result, the Italians found themselves met with considerable success in their efforts, securing not only support from the populace but also large sections of the Catholic hierarchy in Mexico who saw this as an opportunity to save their beloved church from oppression by the overbearing anti-theistic southern government. However, those who remained loyal to the Papacy were quick to point to the depredations committed by the Italian Socialists during the 1920s as proof of the missionaries' bad faith, and presented the Revolutionary Catholic Church as little more than an a vehicle for the Italians to undermine the Catholic Church, throwing them all into the pits of hell regardless of whatever good intentions any of them might hold (18).

Further to the south, there was another government which was to be profoundly impacted by the introduction of the Revolutionary Catholic Church. The Central American Workers' and Farmers' Republic had from the outset been heavily influenced by Christian Socialism, with Cesar Sandino having embraced such beliefs even prior to the start of his rebellion, a belief which had been further cemented by the critical role played by Archbishop Augustin Hombach in his revolutionary endeavours. While land expropriations and redistribution were underway, and radical educational reforms were undertaken to create a class-conscious revolutionary citizenry melded together across the national divides of the preceding nation states which made up the republic, the impact of Hombach and his fellow priests were not to be underestimated.

With the Catholic priesthood deeply embedded in both urban and rural society, they became the best vehicle for the reconstruction and reorganisation of the Central American Republic in its new revolutionary guise. Priests led Sunday schools teaching of the eucharist and salvation alongside Christ's benevolence towards the poor and his wish for equality between all peoples, a message which went over very well with an already energised and firmly anti-American population which viewed this condemnation in the light of their colonial struggle for independence from Spain and the United States. This anti-American bias extended to the American educated and influenced upper classes as well, with harsh repressive measures taken to ensure that all Central Americans received their fair share of their young state's wealth. Despite their socialist foundations, the Sandinistas would prove remarkably difficult to work with for most other Communist movements, their xenophobia, religiosity and fierce nationalism all leaving a distinctly bad taste in the mouths of visiting Russian and Italian representatives.

The latter of these groups, however, proved determined in their efforts at building a relationship with the nascent Sandinista state, finally finding a path towards building a relationship with the Central Americans when Hombach met in person with Luigi Sturzo to discuss their beliefs in April of 1933. This meeting, which would ultimately see the Revolutionary Catholic Church permitted to dispatch seminary students to preach under the watchful eye of Hombach and his fellow churchmen, was to firmly align the Central American Republic with the Revolutionary Catholic Church, even though Hombach and his supporters largely took charge of reorganizing the Central American Church to their liking.

In general, the Central American Church would prove itself resistant to the influence of the Italians and relied far more heavily on their own theological and ideological writings to form their movement, borrowing more sparingly from the Italians than their Mexican compatriots in the Cristero movement to round out their doctrines. The result was the creation of a unique, Central American theological framework for revolution which, while influenced by the Revolutionary Catholic Church of Italy, proved distinct from it. It drew heavily on the syncretic church practices of the rural populace for inspiration and railed loudly against the injustices of colonialism and neocolonialism, developing an extensive collection of writings, both secular and religious in nature, with which to prove that colonialism was not only exploitative, but also downright unchristian. They further worked to build a role for the Central American Church as a guardian of the villages and townships of Central America in response to the Sandinista government's attempts at building a functioning economy on the ruins of a neo-colonial exploitative economic system (19).

Much as with the rest of the Catholic World, the Philippine religious establishment had been thrown into turmoil by the Vatican's flight from Rome and the perceived loss of authority and legitimacy which resulted. As a result, while the Papacy had been struggling to get back onto its feet and back into the fight against the Italian Communists, the Catholics of the wider world had largely been left to their own devices. While in the United States this had led to the slow but steady development of a modernist, progressive Catholic movement within the bounds of the church hierarchy of the Papal Catholic Church, and to violent revolutionary zeal in Central America's Revolutionary Catholic Church, in the Philippines it had resulted in utter chaos and turmoil.

The Church was a central institution in the lives of many Filipinos, but was led primarily by American and European bishops and archbishops whose efforts varied widely in quality and quantity, many seemingly viewing the posting as little better than an exile. There was, however, a growing number of native prelates who began to make their voices heard on issues extending beyond the tight confines of theology. Most prominent was the Bishop of Cebu, Juan Bautista Gorordo, who also happened to be the second native bishops appointed to a diocese in the islands, having come to his post in 1910.

Originally a man noted for his dedication to the work of the church, the fall of Rome was to have a profound impact on his trust and belief in the wider Catholic Church which, when coupled with the constant barrage of racism of his fellow prelates of European and American origin, was to forge him into one of the foremost supporters of Filipino independence in both church and state. Amassing an ever growing following of native-born priests and preachers, Gorordo emerged as a prominent speaker in favor of independence, making common cause with the various secular independence forces, who would find themselves in turn shifting towards an alliance with the native Church institutions in the struggle for independence.

In Manila, where the archconservative Michael O'Doherty sat as Archbishop, this growing nativist movement within the Filipino Church was to prompt considerable worry and gradually saw the foreign church leadership begin to act directly against their native subordinates. In 1929, the matter would boil over when the Irish-born Bishop of Nueva Caceres, John Bernard MacGinley, asked the American authorities to arrest several of his subordinates for sedition, having used the pulpit to preach in favor of independence.

The matter was brought to Governor-General Henry L. Stimson who quickly gave his agreement. It is worth noting here that Stimson, who had been appointed by McAdoo following his successful brokering of the Agreement of Ometepe which brought the Nicaraguan Civil War to a close, had found himself to be a firm opponent to the Filipino Independence movement, believing the Filipinos to be fundamentally unfit for popular self-government and unable to handle the responsibilities of independence. He had thus proven a harsh guardian of American rule of the archipelago and had sunk more than one expedition aiming to ask for independence from the American Congress. The events in Nueva Caceres simply proved his point for him, and gave him an excuse to begin moving more forcefully against the independence movement within the Catholic Church.

The arrests proved far from the last, for over the course of the following year and a half more than fifty priests would find themselves investigated and imprisoned on charges of sedition, with Gorordo himself indicted and imprisoned in early 1930. While the protests which resulted would ordinarily have run their course relatively swiftly, the sudden collapse of Juan Gorordo's health after his imprisonment and subsequent death two months into his imprisonment were to truly enrage the Filipino people. Protests and riots erupted across the islands, with significant sections of Manila burned to the ground, before martial law was imposed and the crisis brought to an end. The Philippine Riots of 1930 were to prove a critical moment in the development of the Philippines and the struggle for Filipino Independence. It at once convinced the Filipino people of the ill wishes of the American colonial government and simultaneously ensured that any talk of Filipino independence in Congress was met with disbelieving laughter, the Filipinos having proven themselves incapable of acting in a civilised manner in American eyes, in effect resulting in the end of Filipino efforts at independence by legislation and a shift towards more forceful methods (20).

Footnotes:

(17) Gramsci had something of a fascination with the role of the Catholic Church even if he viewed it as hostile to the interests of the working classes. He apparently had a pretty good relationship with Luigi Sturzo and other Christian Democratic-Socialists and whatever other combination of the three you can imagine (White Socialists as they come to be known in an Italian context). He is further notable for wanting to build a broad left-wing coalition and emphasis on democratic trends, as such I think he would see some interesting possibilities when presented with the idea of a revolutionary church which sheds all trappings of the corrupt and abusive church and instead becomes a tool for the spread of the revolution. While Gramsci is not necessarily convinced of the White Socialists' beliefs, he does see the potential gains that could emerge if he could support the creation of something capable of challenging their greatest enemies in the form of the Papacy.

I am working in part off of Christian Democratic ideals and Liberation theology, particularly ideas formulated by Gustavo Gutiérrez, for the structure of the church. The RCC is going to be spreading quite widely but I do think it is important to note that while these missionaries being trained are strong adherents of the doctrines formulated in Red Italy, the same might not necessarily be true internationally. The RCC is a lot looser than the Papal Catholic Church (that is the term I will be using to distinguish the two from each other) and will be adopted as a framework by a variety of other Christian socialist movements who might not necessarily agree completely with what is being formulated in Italy. At the moment there is no Pope or Cardinals in the RCC, the structures are still pretty vague and uncertain, as it will take time for clarity to emerge on how exactly to run the organization. At the moment it is directed by an ad hoc collection of left-wing clerics in Italy without clear rank or structure other than that Sturzo serves as their outward representative. There are talks about adopting a council of elders or the like, the conciliarist movement is pretty strong in the RCC, but no decision has been made at this point.

(18) Alright, so Mexico as a whole sees its divide between Villista and Delahuertista further consolidated with the Villistas not really contesting national government - being well aware that a Villista President would present a far more threatening image to their northern neighbour than an associate of de la Huerta. Ironically, Romero and his clique are actually significantly more socialist in outlook than either de la Huerta or Villa. The result of this is that the Delahuertistas look towards Russia for inspiration, while the Villistas increasingly look to Italy. At the same time we start to see the first of many divides within the Catholic Church as the Revolutionary Church makes its entry. The ascension of Romero is not viewed with any degree of happiness by the Americans, but given that Mexico is divided and decentralised under the new regime they are willing to let it pass, busy with their domestic issues.

(19) I think it is important to maintain the development of the Sandinista movement as an independent Catholic-Socialist movement, while acknowledging the way in which foreign movements have a distinct impact on the development of theology and ideology. While the Mexicans are wary of foreign influence, they are far more open than the Central American Republic, which has seen extreme levels of exploitation compared to Mexico. The scars left by the years as Banana Republics are deep and cause the Sandinista movement and their religious allies to be extremely wary of foreign influence of any kind. They see the Villistas and Cristeros as allies, but believe them to have lost their way when they decided to content themselves with state-level power while leaving the federal government to the Delahuertistas, and view themselves as a vanguard for an anti-colonial crusade which they hope to spread across the Americas, at least to start. They view the Russians with horror for their abandonment of religion and are wary of the Italians for their anti-Clerical atrocities in the 20s. It is important to note that the Papal Catholics have almost no influence in the Central American Republic, with Hombach essentially directing religious affairs like a latter-day Patriarch of the Church.

(20) This reading of affairs is probably a bit unfair towards the Americans and the foreign prelates, but everything mentioned in Stimson's outlook stems from his own views on the Nicaraguans IOTL, which seems to have been similar to his views on the Philippines. Gorordo also has a quite different trajectory from OTL, becoming involved deeply in the independence movement whereas IOTL I have been unable to find much information on what he was doing. Gorordo died in 1934 IOTL and was into his seventies at the time of his TTL death, which occurs a year before his OTL resignation, so I think it is plausible that he find imprisonment in a colonial prison too much for his health to bear. In general, this section was about the growing radicalisation of the Filipino independence movement and their disillusionment with the American colonial administration, which will pave the path for a more radical independence movement more open to more radical ideological movements moving forward.

Summary:
The Fall of Siberia plays out in dramatic fashion, culminating in the death of Olga Romanova and the surrender of the Siberian Whites.
The world reacts in multifarious fashion to the incredible events in Russia, from jubilation to horror and ambiguity.
Asian Communism makes major strides forward even as divergences in beliefs grow ever clearer.
Italian Communism spawns a Revolutionary Catholic Church and begins to influence movements such as the Cristeros and Sandinistas. In the Philippines, the independence movement begins to radicalize even as American repression increases.

End Note:

I hope everyone enjoyed this section and that it helped people get a better idea of the independent communist movements around the world which are emerging. As anyone who has read my prior TLs, particularly Their Cross to Bear, will know I have a definite fondness for messing around with Christian theology and ideology which the Revolutionary Catholic Church is most definitely an example of. There are some new actors for us to deal with an a demonstration of exactly how much factional divisions continue to play into the various movements.

All credit to @Ombra for helping give me a deeper insight into Italian affairs, and particularly Gramsci himself, as well as general beta-ing of the update.

I should probably have addressed the development of the Indochinese Communist movement in this segment, but not to worry there is extensive coverage of the region in a few updates.

I really look forward to hearing what everyone thinks!
 
Last edited:
Fascinating stuff as always! Its cool seeing how the catholic and socialists moments interact and I found the Japanese communism in particular really interesting - Its clearly an ideology independent of Moscow and I can't help but wonder where its going to go next. In a way its a microcosm of global communism in this timeline - without OTLs Bolsheviks enforcing ideological "purity" it feels like everyone is taking communist ideas and outing there own spin on them. It will be interesting to see how it all develops in the future.
 
I were ever to be baptised as Catholic I would be this kind of Catholic.

Taking Jesus's teachings fully. These Communists I suppose will juxtaposition Jesus and Marx during sermon and mass - weirdly.
 
Fascinating stuff as always! Its cool seeing how the catholic and socialists moments interact and I found the Japanese communism in particular really interesting - Its clearly an ideology independent of Moscow and I can't help but wonder where its going to go next. In a way its a microcosm of global communism in this timeline - without OTLs Bolsheviks enforcing ideological "purity" it feels like everyone is taking communist ideas and outing there own spin on them. It will be interesting to see how it all develops in the future.

That is part of what I want to explore with the timeline, how Communism might evolve without intense external pressure to conform with Soviet Dogma. There are so many different strands of leftist ideology out there which were left to largely flounder in the face of an all-consuming Marxist-Leninist branch coming out of Russia that really put a damper on leftist ideological development. You did see some variation gain adherence but nothing on the scale of what I want to explore.

I were ever to be baptised as Catholic I would be this kind of Catholic.

Taking Jesus's teachings fully. These Communists I suppose will juxtaposition Jesus and Marx during sermon and mass - weirdly.

It is worth remembering that which the Marxists are an influential group on the left wing, they are far from the only faction there. Additionally, there are many who are taking what they like from Marx and abandoning what doesn't fit their view - it is one of the key conflicts within Nippon Kyosanto ITTL, with Nosaka Sanzo, a Marxist purist, in constant conflict with Kita Ikki. Christian Socialism and proto-Christian Socialism has a long history within the Christian world - hell, there are elements of the Reformation which are reminiscent of some of the more out-there Socialist experiments.

Anyway, happy to hear you approve!
 
First, great update with fascinating material. Second, less wall of text in the future? Difficult to read stuff all bunched together like that. Last, I don't see the US liking these developments. At all.

Looking forward to what comes up next Sunday.
 
First, great update with fascinating material. Second, less wall of text in the future? Difficult to read stuff all bunched together like that. Last, I don't see the US liking these developments. At all.

Looking forward to what comes up next Sunday.

I know, the walls of text are horrible, but every time I have tried to address it in the past it has turned into an absolute mess. The problem lies in the very structure of how I format my updates and is ties in with stuff like the footnotes and flow of the update which makes it a challenge to address. The paragraphs are thematically distinct and every change new section signals a change in topic, often with a single footnote to address the full section or half-section, so if I start partitioning it up into smaller pieces then I need to figure out how to maintain that thematic coherence while giving the sections more room to breath if that makes sense. I will try to see if I can work out some sort of solution - particularly since the updates are only going to get longer from here, but I am not really sure how to resolve the issue.

As to the United States, it just so happens that the rather dramatic 1928 elections are going to be the subject of the next update. The Americans are not pleased, but they sort of overdosed on interventionism in the early 1920s and have gone full bore isolationist under McAdoo, so it will take quite an effort to rouse them from their naval gazing.
 
I were ever to be baptised as Catholic I would be this kind of Catholic.

Entirely personal and anecdotal experience, but as a non-believer and a rural Italian, the amount of Catholics (both secular and of the cloth) I have met with roughly comparable ideas I've met in real life is pretty surprising. I do agree that if there is one strand of Catholicism I could get behind, it's this one - and imho the idea has had plenty of latent potency in Italy for a long time. It took a very specific set of OTL circumstances to keep it disorganised and under the surface, so it's fun to see its potential explored ITTL.
 
Update Thirty (Pt. 1): The Gathering Storm Clouds
The Gathering Storm Clouds

486px-William_Gibbs_McAdoo%2C_formal_photo_portrait%2C_1914.jpg

William Gibbs McAdoo, 31st President of the United States of America

An Election of Fear and Loathing​

The American elections of 1928 were to prove amongst the most contentious in recent times and, while not completely redefining, were to set a new paradigm which would come to dominate the following decade. As with previous years, one of the defining political conflicts of the 1920 centred on the clashes between the Interventionist and Isolationist wings of American politics, with the former having been dominant early in the decade under President Wood and the latter having come to power with President McAdoo. Key to this conflict were the surging conflicts around the world which put American interests and foreign investments increasingly at risk, from Central America and Mexico to Siberia and China. The failures of the McAdoo presidency in the eyes of most commentators were almost entirely of an international nature, with the president able to point to a booming economy, the implementation of moral codes of conduct on entertainment, a successful campaign against bootlegging and a resolution of the western farmers' economic woes through the signing of the 1925 Anglo-American Trade Deal as proof of his successes.

As a result, the focus of the campaign against McAdoo came to centre primarily on international issues while McAdoo and his supporters repeatedly dismissed such efforts as attempts to distract from the President's impressive domestic record. Even as the Siberian Campaign began and the Fruit Companies found themselves increasingly invested in a bloody and expensive struggle with the Sandinistas, McAdoo continued to trumpet his successes, questioning why America was even involved in all of these far flung places and turning the matter on its head by demanding that his opponents justify their wasteful interventionist policies. McAdoo's position within the Democratic Party grew ever more stable as a result, even as calls for him to break with the nativists in the party grew louder amongst progressive Democrats.

In fact, it was this divide over the Democratic Party's nativist tendencies which would rapidly grow to dominate the clashes within the party as the elections neared, with progressive heavyweights like Joseph Taylor Robinson, Al Smith and Henry A. Wallace all undertaking considerable efforts to push back against the nativists. Perhaps the most influential result of this effort on the part of the progressive democrats was to be the selection of Huey Long as keynote speaker at the Democratic Convention and a general strengthening of progressive sentiments in important segments of the party in the leadup to the convention. The nativists were far from willing to let this lie, and in the months leading up to the convention they would significantly improve their own positions with men like Theodore Bilbo, Walter F. George and James T. Heflin condemning the progressives as un-American, un-Democratic and fundamentally un-Christian, a dig particularly aimed at the Catholic Al Smith and other Irish-Americans in the party.

While still limited mostly to party insiders, the clash within the Democratic Party was becoming increasingly clear to the public even as their rivals in the Progressive and Republican Parties were consolidating their positions in the lead-up to the coming election. The Republicans, while dealing with the growth of nativists within the party themselves in the form of Indiana Klan-aligned politicians, were far more united than the Democrats. However, the question of who exactly would rise to become their nominee remained in question as the two great figures of the party, Charles Curtis and Frank Lowden, both hoped to be nominated in what they believed to be their best chance at unseating the Democratic Party. The situation in the Progressive Party was more disarrayed, a result of their undisputed leader, Robert M. La Follette, having died in 1925 just as the influx of Republican Progressives entered the party alongside a smaller number of democrats. The result was a free-for-all between the countless factions of the party which left everyone dissatisfied and, far more critically, left the electorate confused as to what exactly it would mean to vote Progressive (1).

The first of the party conventions to kick off was the Republican Convention, held in Kansas City from the 15th till the 18th of June 1928, and was dominated by the figures of Charles Curtis and Frank Lowden. The four day convention would see a good deal of back and forth, as the two party leaders both held considerable support, but ultimate it would be Frank Lowden who emerged victorious. Key to the decision to back Lowden had been the sudden entry of Edward Jackson of Illinois into the debate, who reacted with horror at the prospect of a Curtis candidacy, viewing the Native American-descended senator with ill-disguised disgust. While Lowden was happy to see his primary rival sunk by white supremacists, the sudden rise of a known member of the Indiana Klan to prominence within the part was to cause considerable unease amongst Republican supporters. The result was that while Edward Jackson and his Klan backers put in a great deal of effort, and more than a little graft, to try and secure the vice presidency for Jackson, it would be the cold, silent Calvin Coolidge who secured the nomination in a powerful rebuke of Jackson and his compatriots.

The Democratic Convention, which kicked off on the 26th of June, was to prove one for the ages, leaving behind a completely changed political party. With the news that Lowden had been selected by the Republicans and the continued public recrimination caused by the Indiana Klan's involvement in the Republican Convention, the Democrats felt confident in victory, and as such went into the convention with an air of inevitability. Not only was McAdoo a certain lock, but his Vice President Pat Harrison had proven himself a surprisingly active campaigner in the south, ginning up support for McAdoo, and was widely liked by large segments of the party. The one fly in the ointment was the progressive wing of the party who refused to go quietly into the night.

As with so many other major events in America in the decade to follow, it all began with Huey Long. The maverick governor of Louisiana was already well on his way to clinching a second term as governor and had, during the floods of the previous year, emerged as a wildly controversial national figure in the progressive camp of the Democratic Party. While derided as authoritarian, verging on dictatorial, in his rule of the state, he was widely praised for his industrial, infrastructural and educational reforms - but was viewed with fear and worry by his nativist neighbors in the south for his desegregationist and populist ways. His selection as keynote speaker had been met with considerable opposition and if not for a massive investment of political capital by the progressives would likely have never happened. It was to prove a fateful occurrence. Taking the stage after the initial festivities, Long began to speak. He was eloquent, bombastic and more than a little foulmouthed, and if his speech were to be summarised into one sentence it was this: "The Ku Klux Klan is a Cancer upon America and must be eradicated root and stem!"

Understandably, Long's speech was met with more than a little outrage as Klan-affiliated party figures cried out in rage, seeking to shout down the young governor. Blistering rants and ravings erupted, all of which were bellowed down by the famously loud-mouthed governor, even as the progressives arose with cheers and the rat-tat-tat of claps. Finally, after more than fifteen minutes of speaking, Long came to an end with a plea, no, a demand, that McAdoo condemn the Klan and free the party of their toxic influence. When McAdoo took the stage later that evening, he did not mention the Ku Klux Klan a single time. The following day, Huey Long and the progressive delegates walked out of the convention hall and the Democratic Party (2).

While McAdoo and Harrison were endorsed by the Democratic Party, the damage had already been done. The walkout of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party would not only see Joseph Taylor Robinson, Al Smith and Henry A. Wallace leave the party, but also the prominent West Virginian John W. Davis, the young and popular Georgian Richard Russell Jr and Huey Long himself depart for the open embrace of the Progressive Party. Not only did this mean the consolidation of the Democrats under the nativist and isolationist wing of the Democratic Party, it resulted in the fundamental reshaping of the Progressive Party, who the progressive Democrats joined.

The Progressive Party had always been seen as something of an outgrowth of the Republican Party, with its basis in the Roosevelt machine and the later addition of Farmer-Labour and Social Democratic forces from the Great Lakes region. However, the addition of the Democratic Progressives were to bring several important new constituencies - most prominently Catholic Americans, Louisianians and sections of the poor and working classes of the south of both light and dark skin. The arrival of Long and the Democratic Progressives was also to prove vital for the reconsolidating of the Progressive Party, resulting in the nomination of the former Republican Hiram Johnson of California and the selection of Huey Long, despite the misgivings of some in the party, as Vice Presidential candidate (3).

The chaos and vitriol which began with the party conventions only escalated as the presidential campaigns came under way. In Louisiana and surrounding states Huey Long campaigned openly and often against the Ku Klux Klan alongside various other prominent former Democrats in a bid to undermine Democratic power and Klan backing in the south, even as Hiram Johnson took the lead in securing support from the Progressive heartland in the north and north-west, as well as in his home state of California. Al Smith and other prominent Irishmen took up the progressive cause as well, campaigning widely in the Irish bastions of Massachusetts and New York, while efforts at mustering the Italian vote proved less important and successful.

At the same time, the McAdoo campaign's supporters turned their vitriol against the Progressives, drumming up anti-Catholic sentiments and claiming that Huey Long was planning to abolish segregation, miscegenation laws and the poll tax in order to strengthen the Progressive in the south and allow the Blacks to run rampant. While his supporters engaged in race baiting and ever more forceful attacks on his enemies, McAdoo himself primarily ran an overtly clean campaign focusing primarily on his administration's successes and promising a strengthening of the government efforts against bootleggers and Wets alike.

By comparison, the Republican campaign of Frank Lowden seemed lost in the early stages of the campaign, focusing their efforts primarily on foreign affairs, reduced government spending and intervention, but compared to the titanic clash between the Democrats and Progressives they were largely sidelined by the political fireworks between Democrats and Progressives. It was under these conditions that a Klansman, of uncertain affiliation, attempted to assassinate Governor Long in early September of 1928. The scandal which erupted over the attempted assassination of a vice presidential candidate putatively undertaken by a paramilitary force allied with either or both of their rival parties was to have immense consequences not only for the Klan and the course of the elections, but also for American politics for decades to come.

The first to act was D.C. Stephenson, who on learning of the attempted assassination issued a public condemnation of the Old Klan and publicly made the distinction between the Indiana and Old Klan clear to the public. Not to be outdone, Hiram Evans was swift to claim that the assassin had been personally dispatched by Stephenson and that his subsequent efforts were just an attempt at smearing the Old Klan with the Indiana Klan's own radicalism. The destruction of the assassin's body by the enraged mob would leave it impossible to determine either way, and all police efforts to ascertain the assassin's identity would prove for naught. Hardly one to let such an opportunity go unexploited, Long refused to make any distinction between the two Klans and held both equally responsible, pointing to them as a great cancer which was eating away at the heart of American freedom and democracy by drawing in both major parties and infusing the politics of America with violence.

Already roiled by the attempt on Long's life, McAdoo would find his position further weakened with the advent of the Siberian Campaign, which proved right all of the Republican's talking points of how McAdoo had neglected foreign affairs, and the increasingly troubled economic straits of the Fruit Companies involved in the Central American Banana Wars. Nevertheless, McAdoo continued to make his case on domestic prosperity and successful support for the cause of prohibition, strengthening the latter case by ordering the arrest of the Gustin Gang in Boston in late-October, thereby at once demonstrating the links between the Irish Catholics, the Wets and Bootlegging operations, in the process tarring all three groups with one broad brush.

While Lowden was able to strengthen his position in the polls by continuing to attack McAdoo on foreign affairs, he was hampered by a largely inactive vice presidential candidate, vote splitting with the Progressives and factional strife with Curtis supporters, who found Lowden's support from the Indiana Klan loathsome, particularly in light of events in the months leading up to the election. This connection to the Klan had come into focus during October, as the Indiana Klan's efforts to expand into Ohio, in order to influence the election there, had run into a radical faction of the Old Klan.

The Ohio section of the Old Klan was dominated by a paramilitary faction known as the Black Guard and led by William Shepard and Virgil "Bert" Effinger. The intrusion of Republican-supporting Indianans, intruding onto Ohio Klan territory, would result in violent reprisals already beginning in August, but steadily escalating until these clashes hit their climax in the Indianapolis Southside Massacre, where a heavily armed parade by Indiana Klansmen marched through the predominantly minority neighborhood in a show of force and intimdation, only to be attacked with grenades, Thompson Machineguns and pistols by Ohio Klansmen in dressed in black robes. The resultant struggle would leave 16 Indiana Klansmen dead and another 28 wounded while the attackers took an unknown number of losses, having taken their dead and wounded with them when they escaped. The resultant firestorm of public outrage would ultimately fall primarily on the Indiana Klan, and the Republicans by extension, as a result of which Klansmen were arrested on the scene (4).

On election day, the 6th of November 1928, proceedings came under way across the United States under a cloud of fear and tension, poll projections varied wildly and all contenders seemed to have a path to victory, and there were some who even questioned what would happen if no party was able to secure the 266 electoral votes that it would require to emerge victorious. However, when the results were finally published it would see a return of the McAdoo government. The chaos and violence which had engulfed the nation had seen voters stream towards safety and security, finding it in the clear domestic successes of the current administration. While the situation in Russia was worsening and states south of the border were acting out, such issues had little direct impact on the majority of Americans.

Even still, the opposition to McAdoo had found itself divided between Republicans and Progressives in many states, with the result being that the Democrats were able to win out in several key states. Ultimately, those who lost out the most would be the Republicans, who saw their already rapidly shrinking support west of the Mississippi reduced to a few states in the Southwest, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Nevada, while California turned towards the progressives. In fact, the Progressives were able to counter the Democratic surge resulting from the passage of McAdoo's Farmers' Assistance bill, and even extended their grip further south to include Kansas and Colorado, while Huey Long was able to wield his indomitable political machine to turn Louisiana to the Progressives, the sole southern state to break with the Southern Democratic powers in the election.

The Republicans were successful in turning Indiana in their favour, but saw their midwestern bulwark collapse in the face of vote splitting with the Progressives and a surge in support for the Democrats in Delaware, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, shocking the Republican establishment to its core. In fact, while the Democrats were actually able to secure more electoral votes in the 1928 elections than in those of 1924, improving from 274 to 281, the Republicans saw a calamitous fall into third place as the Progressives secured 133 electors to the Republican 117. At the same time, the Progressives extended their seats in the senate to 25, with the Republicans reduced to 36 while the Democrats fell to 39 seats, ensuring that McAdoo would need to work with the other parties if he wanted to pass any significant legislation. At the same time, the Democrats saw their gains from the mid-term elections of 1926 consolidated with a firm majority of 224 seats, while the Progressives secured 91, the Republicans fell to 118 with minority parties securing 7 seats (5).

Footnotes:

(1) It is worth noting that while the attacks on McAdoo on foreign policy are warranted, prior to the convention the situation abroad isn't actually all that bad. The Agreement of Omtepe has recently been signed and has the Sandinistas on the run, and the Siberian Campaign is only just nearing its starting date. McAdoo goes into the convention with a string of domestic policy successes, a major trade agreement with the British and an increasingly clear direction for the party, namely nativism, a strong government and isolationism. Now we know that things aren't going to stay rosy for long, but it should be clear that in the summer of 1928 McAdoo is widely viewed as a shoe in for the election.

(2) I may have had a tiny bit too much fun there, but here we are. The Democratic Party was split firmly between progressive and conservative/nativist factions IOTL as well and the 1920s were a period of considerable intra-party conflict which hampered them immensely. Now IOTL it was the conservative/nativist wing of the party which ended up getting the worst of it, with the KKK, Catholicism and the rise of progressive voices like FDR, Al Smith and the like all causing a shift in progressive favour. In this case the situation is quite different. Under McAdoo, the nativists have emerged as one of the strongest factions in the party while the progressives have been steadily marginalised. Thus, where IOTL it was the segregationists and nativists threatening walkouts, here it is the Progressives who decide to abandon ship. The existence of the Progressive Party had already siphoned some of the progressive Democratic support, but the refusal of McAdoo to do anything about the Klan and the general feeling that the party has been taken over by nativists, ultimately drive them to follow Huey Long out of the party.

(3) Our man Huey Long is nothing if not ambitious and with the notoriety gained at the Democratic Convention, he is able to secure a VP nomination for himself. As the most famous anti-Klan crusader in the country, he becomes an obvious choice for a party which seeks to paint both the Republicans and Democrats as being in bed with the Klan (There are some pretty salacious satirical drawings emphasising these links which become famous during the 1928 elections). The result is a significant boost to the Progressive Party, which goes into the coming elections looking less like a third wheel and more like a true contender. Just to reiterate the contenders: The Democrats have McAdoo/Harrison, the Republicans have Lowden/Coolidge and the Progressives have Johnson/Long.

(4) Just a reminder that the attempted assassination of Huey Long mentioned here is the same attempt as that mentioned in Update Twenty-Seven, Explosive Americana. While the escalation in violence seen during 1928 might seem shocking, the entire decade has been marked by a growing trend towards violence between groups and factions in the United States. From the Anarchist bombings, Red Scare and race riots to an active long-lasting guerrilla war in West Virginia, violent clashes between protesters and military men during the Chicago parades, growing Klan authority, we have been following a trend of radicalisation and increasing use of violence for political means throughout the timeline. Now granted, the actions of the Black Guard and Klansmen in general are not directly controlled or directed by the Democratic or Republican party, but it doesn't look good for either party. At the same time you have Huey Long and the Progressives as a whole railing against the Klan and the parties they support.

(5) I know that some might be surprised by the Democratic surge, but honestly - in times of crisis people tend to flock to trusted leaders and McAdoo has, at least so far, done a pretty good job domestically, which is what is valued highest at the time outside of elite New York and Washington circles. The Republicans really limp their way out of this while the Progressives surge onto the stage as a full-on major party. While the 1924 elections come to be seen as the Progressive Party's coming out party, 1928 is seen as the moment in which they emerged as a direct competitor to the Republicans and Democrats. Perhaps the most consequential development, however, is the further growth of the Progressive Party in the Senate, which has resulted in a situation in which the government cannot pass legislation without support from one of the other parties.

1928 Elections:
Senate: Dem - 39, Rep - 36, Prog - 25, Other - 0
House: Dem - 224, Rep - 118, Prog - 91, Other - 7

640px-Dust-storm-Texas-1935.png

Dust Storm in Texas

The Storm Before The Storm​

More than anything else, the second term of President McAdoo would be characterised by political gridlock as the ugly wounds of the 1928 election continued to fester. The rise of the Progressive Party, which was fervently hostile to both the other parties, exposed a fundamental weakness of the American political system when no party was able to secure a majority. While the Democrats had had to deal with this in the 1924-28 period, they had largely been able to pass their policies by working with factions in the other parties to pass legislation, only needing to peel a maximum of five senators from any one party to pass legislation. However, with only 39 senators they now needed to peel away between half and a third of their rivals' senators if they wanted anything passed. While this might have been possible in more congenial circumstances, it would prove next to impossible in an era of partisanship.

Despite this situation, McAdoo had initially been hopeful and sought to entice the Progressives into supporting his efforts with a further farm relief bill and increased financing for the census, both of which were met with curt refusal by Hiram Johnson and William Borah, who took the lead for the Progressives in the Senate. The collapse of the Siberian Whites in early 1929 would send shockwaves through the Republican Party, whose backers had invested heavily in the region and had just seen many millions of dollars go up in flames in a couple months, and turned what had initially been a dislike of the Democratic government into a fervent hatred.

With Congress hopelessly deadlocked in the Senate, and as a result the legislative branch frozen fast, McAdoo turned to Presidential Executive Orders to ensure the passage of policy beginning in 1930, most prominently tasking the AILE to turn its focus on the links between the Irish-American criminal underground and the Irish independence movement, a move which would prove critical to weakening the ties between the Presidency and the AILE, as its director August Vollmer outright refused the order, viewing it as an infringement upon his agency's hard won independence from external interference. The issue would steadily escalate over the course of 1930 before being brought to the Supreme Court for judgement - where the independence of the AILE from the Presidency was entrenched.

Even so, the AILE would still increasingly turn its attentions towards the Irish criminal organisations, although the increasingly covert activities of the White Hand would see the focus primarily turn towards the Great Lakes region. During this time, Vollmer yet again demonstrated his increasing opposition to McAdoo through the creation of the Anti-Klan Taskforce, which began to investigate the involvement of the various Ku Klux Klan factions on a federal scale, and placed growing attention to the problem of armed and violent paramilitary movements around the United States.

Hamstrung in Congress and increasingly at odds with the Supreme Court, which proved a determined challenger to McAdoo's efforts at extending the power of the Executive Order, the position of the national Democratic Party and McAdoo himself experienced a steady decline in support, a fact which was first demonstrated in the Mid-term elections of 1930 which saw the Democrats fall to 183 seats, the Progressives grow to 121 and the Republicans to 129 seats in the House, while two Democratic Senate seats fell to the Progressives (6).

Despite the political situation, the American Economy continued to boom throughout the second McAdoo Administration, factories blooming, powerplants burning and new businesses sprouting up by the day. Exceedingly lenient loan schemes, at least partly financed by a guarantee on the part of the government to underwrite the finances of smaller banks, which resulted in an explosion in the number of small, often rural, banks and a resulting development of new leasing and rental arrangements, allowed countless ordinary Americans to live a life of immense comfort when compared to the pre-Great War era. Having gotten a taste of a new quality of life, many would take out further loans with which to further improve their lives, an arrangement which was often structured around a lower rate of interest in the first couple years before it increased dramatically.

While there were plenty of Americans who were able to improve their lives, finding an ever growing number of jobs in a vast and expanding number of industries, without these loans a sufficient part of the populace would fall into a growing spiral of debt which gradually began to slow economic progress. Additionally, while the American farmers had found an outlet for their agricultural goods in the trade agreement with the British, this would simply result in even more money being put into expanding capacity - massively extending an already over-supplied sector of the economy and drawing calls for further government support in the form of a Farmers' Assistance Bill.

The expansion of American agriculture could not have come at a worse time, for beginning in the summer of 1930 the favorable climatic conditions of the 1920s gave way to an unusually dry era which would in time lead to drought stalking the heart of America. From Texas in the south to the Northern Prairies, some of the best farmland in the world suddenly fell under the dry spell to end all dry spells - showing no sign of ending any time soon. While most farmers made it through 1930 and 31 mostly intact, the following years would see the situation grow increasingly dire as water sources shrank, the earth dried out, the crops died and the livestock with it. Going into the 1932 elections the situation was becoming so dire that the ongoing drought was producing large dust storms across large parts of the continent and forcing people from their land.

The economy would experience further hardships as the McAdoo government's neglect and mismanagement of foreign affairs grew ever clearer and impactful, with the collapse of the Fruit Companies at first causing shortages in tropical fruit, although this could be alleviated by primarily Colombian and Venezuelan fruit plantations, and unemployment, which was further exacerbated in the slowly expanding ripples of economic calamity as the impact of losing the immense investments in White Siberia played havoc with the high finances of the New York elite. Gradually, these consequences and subsequent international crises would make themselves known as increasingly desperate elite financiers looked for any and every possible source of income to alleviate their financial straits, with due process and diligence largely set aside in the struggle for profitable investment and capital growth (7).

Just because the elections came to an end, did not mean that the conflict both between factions of the Klan and the wider struggle against anti-Klan forces under Huey Long came to an end. In Ohio, the growing debt of blood between the Black Guard and Indiana Klan would see an escalating cycle of violence following the Indianapolis Southside Massacre which would shock the region to its core. While D.C. Stephenson and Hiram Evans both sought to tamp down on the violence, equally aware of the damage it was doing to the Klan as a whole, they proved largely unsuccessful in their efforts. At the heart of the matter lay the relatively weak central authority of the Old Klan, which largely allowed chapters to run themselves in order to achieve a national presence, and the resultant opposition of Ohio Klan figures to interference from the National leadership.

Such clashes had already lead to the Indiana Klan's breach with the Old Klan, and while the Ohioans remained staunchly Democratic in affiliation, they soon began to ape their Indiana neighbours by moving in an increasingly independent direction. Noted for their fanaticism, propensity for violence and the distinct black Klan robes worn by their elite Black Guard, the Ohio Klan soon began to garner national attention. As bombings, shootings and stabbings occurred with frightening regularity along the border between Indiana and Ohio between the two factions, the need for new recruits would see the Black Guard turn to particularly unsavoury methods, kidnapping people off the street and bringing them to rural training camps for indoctrination and training, with a graduation ceremony, and resultant freedom, requiring the murder of a minority person. With public outcry over the violence growing across the Midwest and anti-Klan sentiment entrenching itself in the communities hit by the intra-Klan strife in the new decade, August Vollmer spied an opportunity to further distinguish the AILE as an independent law enforcement institution through the dispatch of more than 200 agents to Indiana and Ohio, who began a wide-ranging investigation to identify and bring to justice the perpetrators of the countless crimes being committed in the region (8).

Not to be left out, Huey Long would take a break from his near-constant anti-Klan campaigning in the South, primarily in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri and Mississippi, to do a tour of the Midwest. Undertaken in early-1932, at the height of the intra-Klan violence, Long would speak before massive crowds on the terror and destructiveness brought upon their communities by the Klan, citing the names of those killed in the individual communities in an impressive display of memory while openly daring the Klan to take another shot at him. It wasn't long before someone took him up on the offer, with unsuccessful assassination attempts occurring at rallies in Fort Wayne, Muncie, Dayton and Columbus before Huey Long was convinced to end his tour. Nevertheless, despite the violence that these rallies engendered, they would be seen widely as a roaring success and a demonstrable blow to the power and authority of the Klan in the Midwest. More and more, the sentiment seemed to be that the Klan was playing a critical role in the degeneration of American society into violence and chaos.

While Long made Klan membership an imprisonable offense in Louisiana in early 1930, only months before securing a seat as Senator for Louisiana in the 1930 Midterm elections, and campaigned nationally to secure similar legislation was passed elsewhere, the Klan found its position in both the Republican and Democratic Parties increasingly in question. While Hiram Evans was able to maintain his position as powerbroker in the Democratic Party, the same could not be said for D.C. Stephenson and the Indiana Klan, whose publicly known members would find themselves ejected from the party under the direction of a resurgent Charles Curtis in 1931, his animosity towards the Klan had been stoked beyond measure by the Klan's interference in the 1928 Republican Convention (9).

While Huey Long had been able to develop a national profile, soon becoming one of the most recognisable men in America, he had come to find that his hold on Louisiana itself was shakier than originally believed. The issue, more than any other, stemmed from the personage of Long's Lieutenant Governor Paul Narcisse Cyr, a man appointed to appease the Old Regulars who he had pushed from power in 1924. Cyr, who had developed the frightful habit of declaring himself in charge of state affairs the moment Long left the state, gradually eroded what little relationship he had with Long after his appointment in 1928. This collapsing relationship was further escalated by a series of events in 1930, as Long was elected to the senate but refused to leave his seat of power in Louisiana to Cyr. The clashes between Cyr and Long rapidly worsened as Long continually delayed resigning as governor. Throughout the spring and summer of 1931, Cyr threatened to take the oath of office as governor but did not do so.

In October 1931, Cyr filed suit in a bid to oust Long as governor and declared himself governor, having a justice of the peace in Shreveport give him the oath of office in the Caddo Parish courthouse. Cyr next departed for Baton Rouge where he threatened to take over the governor's mansion. In response, Long ordered the National Guard to mobilise and had troops surrounded the state capitol with strict orders not to admit Cyr, replacing the guardsmen with state police a few days later. For a time, the city turned into an armed camp, with both Long and Cyr packing pistols. However, without police power, Cyr soon realized that he was beaten and returned to his home of Jeanerette while Long, who had dubbed Cyr the "tooth puller from Jeanerette" in reference to his background as a dentist, flatly deposed his former Lieutenant governor - even ordering Cyr removed from the state payroll, resulting in the forfeit of all pensions and wages. When Cyr began to protest that he remained Lieutenant Governor, Long was swift to claim that the rightful Lieutenant Governor was not Cyr at all, but rather that his close ally Oscar K. Allen had taken up the post already and was now the legitimate successor to Long - a fact which would be confirmed in a closely managed special election in late 1931 which saw Oscar appointed to succeed Long.

Affairs in Louisiana now organised, Allen being so closely tied to Long as to be viewed as little more than a stooge, Long was able to turn his complete attentions to the Midwest and the national sphere as a whole, taking up his senate seat full-time in DC after having spent more than a year shuttling between Louisiana and the Capital. It was during this time that Long set out on his Midwestern tour and, perhaps most significantly, made contact with the ascendant Catholic radio star Father Charles Edward Coughlin, who would prove critical to boosting Long's contacts in the wider Catholic, particularly Irish-American Catholic, circles. As fierce a denouncer of the Ku Klux Klan as Long himself, Coughlin had emerged initially in 1926 in response to cross burnings on the grounds of his church and the rise of the Klan in his home town of Detroit, where they menaced his Irish-American congregants. In the lead-up to the 1928 elections, he had shifted his focus from religious topics to politics, and rapidly saw a growth in his following, vocally supporting the Progressives as the only force standing up to the Klan in America. He would soon extend his messages into anti-Capitalist topics and by the early 1930s had grown his support to number in the hundreds of thousands. The meeting between Long and Coughlin would soon see the development of a close partnership as the two began to discuss their views on the politics of the day and the role of the Progressive Party in a future America (10).

Footnotes:

(6) As is stated in the update, the American political system really isn't equipped to handle three major parties - especially if they cannot figure out how to work together. With Huey Long and the Progressives as a whole in an openly declared war with the Klan, and the Republicans horrified at McAdoo's total failure to deal with foreign affairs. The President is unable to gin up the support he needs for the legislative branch of government to function. When this is coupled with a Supreme Court staffed primarily by judges put in place by progressive governments or Republican conservative judges, it becomes hard for him to accomplish much of anything. Finally, unlike in the modern day where the American President can use Executive Orders on an incredibly wide array of issues, at this time executive orders have not seen broad use outside of wartime and are rarely active policy initiatives. This was one of the major changes which occurred under FDR, and McAdoo just doesn't have the same level of support as FDR had.

1930 Midterm Elections:
Senate: Dem - 37, Rep - 36, Prog - 27, Other - 0
House: Dem - 183, Rep - 129, Prog - 121, Other - 7

(7) While the economic situation is quite different from OTL we still see many of the developments which occurred in the American economy IOTL, such as reckless consumer spending. One thing to note is that this is further worsened by the government's promise of underwriting banks' finances, which occurs as part of the McAdoo government's efforts to boost economic growth even further to shore up their faltering support. At the same time we see the beginnings of the drought which will lead to the Dust Bowl of the mid-1930s and the growing economic disruption which results. While the economy is still booming going into 1932, it has definitely begun to weaken, as more and more warning signs begin to emerge of a pending economic recession. Finally, we have the desperate elite financiers investing their money in increasingly harebrained schemes - particularly the countless small banks popping up all over the country prove targets of this financing, which in turn results in further unsustainable consumer and small-holder debt.

(8) The situation with the Klan is deteriorating quickly, but Ohio and Indiana are really hotspots for the strife, and the effects are being felt in the societies that they claim to protect. The part about abducting people off the street in order to recruit them is actually an OTL practice of the Black Guard, who were later rebranded as the Black Legion, and were probably amongst the most extreme of the various Klan affiliates at the time. Also note that by bombings, I am mostly referring to people throwing grenades or sticks of dynamite through a window or the like, not massive car bombs or anything of that scale. It is mostly just skirmishing between feuding factions after the Southside Massacre draws attention to the conflict. It is worth noting that the AILE agents dedicated to the anti-Klan Taskforce in Ohio and Indiana are amongst the largest in the agency's history.

(9) Is Huey Long being exceedingly lucky here, in surviving this mad caper across the Midwest and campaigning elsewhere? Yes, definitely. But, when you consider the amount of attempts made on various prominent political figures both at the time and since IOTL, it should remain plausible. Huey Long is overtly reckless with his own safety, as he was on occasion IOTL, but in fact maintains a highly trained and disciplined bodyguard who are able to deal with most threats and wears various protective gear to reduce the danger where possible. That said, the thing to take away from this part is that the support for the Klan is crumbling as their promises prove hollow and they begin to directly harm the communities they claim to protect.

(10) Huey Long's struggle with Cyr is almost entirely OTL and gives a better idea of his disregard for norms and willingness to use state resources in his personal feuds. It is worth noting here that the Coughlin-Long relationship forms earlier than IOTL and that Coughlin takes a significantly less anti-socialist outlook ITTL. He is far more concerned with the rise of the far-right than with the left, viewing the Red Scare and subsequent demonisation of communists and socialists as an effort on the part of the far-right's efforts to distract from their own misdeeds. He is by no means a socialist or communist, but he isn't overtly hostile as he was IOTL, which is what makes it possible for him to align with the Progressives. He does take an anti-Semitic tone, but it isn't anything people really make a note of with him ITTL. In general anti-Semitism just isn't as much of a hot button topic as it proved to be IOTL during this era, it is present and widespread but not something notable - much as it was prior to the Great War.

End Note:
I know that I have been in the weeds for a lot of people during these latest updates, but this should be a topic which plenty of people have sufficient knowledge to get into the nuances. The American political and economic systems are beginning to crack under the pressure as partisan politics rise to the fore and the issue of the Klan rises to dominate the national consciousness.

I really hope that people enjoyed this update and that we can get a good discussion going on these developments.
 
Last edited:
The situation is definitely getting spicier ITTL. I wonder, with the electoral problems faced by the US ITTL, will there be any moves towards electoral reform? (like turning it into a proportional system, perhaps? Okay, that's a bit radical of me there)
 
Top