66 Years of Anarchy: A TL

1066 is an overused PoD, but I think I'm going to be doing something vaguely interesting with it. The actual Point of Divergence is a simple one: a minor Norman lord who died in the closing stages of the Battle of Hastings survives due to an equestrian mishap. Nothing I say about him has any basis in fact, but it is plausible that a noble companion of William the Conqueror could have found himself in these circumstances and, in an emotional state, acted as I have him act. I merely chose a real man who is known by name and not much else. As per the title, I aim to take this to 1132 - any more would be dull, although I might get bored a few decades early.

By the way, this is my first TL, so feedback would be welcomed. Here goes:

---

The sun rose majestically over the raven-speckled battlefield, slowly ripening the corpses of thousands of young men who had died on that hill the day before. Local villagers and survivors from the losing army had already begun to stagger, dazed and confused, around the scene – some said prayers for friends and acquaintances, but most knelt in the congealing blood to fulfil the solemn task of looting the possessions of the dead. They pored over jewellery and swords, holding them up the clear dawn light to check for notches and cracks before returning the rejects to their erstwhile owners. There were plenty more fish in the sea, and the early birds could afford to be selective.

About a mile upwind of battlefield near Hastings, William the Bastard’s men had barely slept. They had only been allowed to bed down after midnight, and now the indefatigable victor was marching vigorously between the tents of his lieutenants, arranging the minutiae of an army in the field. Thousands of dozy victors arose stiff-backed on that 15th of October and bustled over their victuals, but several were less ebullient than their master. These were the men who, justly or no, would be deemed cowards for their conduct the day before. Eustace II, Count of Boulogne had, following secret orders from the Duke of Normandy, pretended to flee from the field of battle in order to draw the fyrd into an envelopment, but those orders had hitherto remained secret and Count Eustace had begun to notice the fingers and whispers that seemed to pursue him around the camp.

Another unhappy Norman was Engenulf de Laigle, a nobleman of 45 years who, beset at home with money troubles, had spent most of his family fortune on horses and weaponry for himself and his tenants, intending to recoup the losses through pillaging and land grants upon the regime change. That latter didn’t seem so certain after his conduct during the decisive battle. In the final charge against the Saxon redoubt in the Malfosse, his knackered carthorse had gone lame and dawdled aimlessly, tripping up the destriers of other Norman knights. Engenulf had spent the night tossing and turning in embarrassment – in his ears rang the continual refrain of Duke William’s jeering laughter.

As the dawn forced his sleepless eyes open, he fiddled with his money-purse: one solitary coin remained with which to pay his dozens of retainers. There was no alternative – he must descend to thievery. And so, Engenulf de Laigle clutched his threadbare cloak about himself and shivered over to the reeking battlefield, the site of his ignominy. But before he could reach the edge of the Norman encampment, a booming voice rang out:

“Ah, Engenulf! Not joining the desecraters, I hope!” William the Bastard’s good-natured chuckles turned into malicious jeers in Engenulf de Laigle’s fatigued ears. He wished morosely that he had died in that stinking ditch last night, to be remembered as a hero. “Now, my good man, you simply must come to my tent – we need to decide on our marching orders and ascertain whether there are any other English armies in the field. London seems to be the key objective; if we can ensconce ourselves in the hub of insular trade we could essentially wait out any rural Counts with grievances against the Lord’s chosen conquerors…” and so he continued as he bustled towards the grander pavilions in the centre of the camp with the surly Engenulf in tow.

William the Bastard, Duke of Normandy, claimant to the Kingdom of England cast aside his tent-flap, revealing his principal captains already gesturing over a map on a wooden trestle. At a glance, there seemed to be a three-sided argument going on, with everyone bellowing at once. Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, William’s half-brother, had formed two fists – one was beating the table in the environs of Winchester while the other pudgy ball was being waved alarmingly around the nose of William FitzOsbern. FitzOsbern himself was struggling to put his point across to another William, son of the Count of Evreux, who had plunged his dagger into the English Channel, and then, realising his geographical mistake, thrust it carefully into Northampton. Nobody else was paying any attention to William of Evreux’s theatrics, as he was a rather repellent and foolhardy young man who had scarcely achieved his majority and hadn’t distinguished himself particularly in his one day’s experience of warfare. Two others were present: Count Eustace of Boulogne squatted in a corner, weeping over the loss of his reputation and Robert de Beaumont, known as a wise man, lolled on the Bastard’s blankets with his head in his hands, silently bemoaning the idiocy of his fellows.

When the Duke entered his tent, all this commotion ceased. All fists relaxed and William of Evreux’s dagger was surreptitiously retrieved from the East Midlands. William the Bastard’s entry meant business, and all divisions were forgotten in the face of his charisma and his military expertise. All men present knew in their hearts that he would be remembered as a Conqueror as they leant forward visibly to hear his plan.

His mouth opened, but instead of a plan there came a trickle of blood from the corner of his lips. There was a shocked silence. Slowly, almost graciously, William of Normandy slumped onto the earth with a sickening thud with a dirk in his spine. Behind him stood the grey-faced Lord of Laigle.

“Stabbed in the back, by God!” roared Bishop Odo of Bayeux, forgetting his vocation for a moment. The councillors reached for their weapons, but William of Evreux was already holding his dagger, which he threw at the immobile murderer. It hit Engenulf de Laigle clean between the eyes.

William of Evreux exulted. “Did you see that? I got the miserable c*nt right in the brain! That’s what you get when you f*ck with William the Conqueror!”

The others looked on in horror.
 
Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, was the first to string together a complete sentence without cursing. “So I suppose the boy Robert will be the new Duke.”

“Out of the question,” said the Count of Boulogne, “he’s only twelve years old, and I don’t think your Duchy will survive another minority. Don’t you remember the 1030s?” As a matter of fact, Odo could not, but William’s minority had been a dismal, anarchic time. The other commanders murmured their assent.

“And William was a bastard anyway, so he didn’t have any right to be Duke,” interjected William FitzOsbern, “So we can legally exclude his children from the succession without seeming cruel. Does anybody know who the new Duke should be, legally?” A chorus of shrugs ensued. William of Evreux started to speak, but everyone ignored him.

At length, Robert de Beaumont stopped convulsing in shock and supplied the relevant information. “The closest legitimate heir would be William, Count of Burgundy, who is a grandson of Duke Richard II, just like Duke William.”

William FitzOsbern nodded. “Well, we’ll have him, then. What’s the form for this sort of situation? Do we write him a letter or do we just wait for him to turn up in Caen with a Papal banner and eight thousand men?” Eustace of Boulogne gave a wry laugh but it didn’t seem altogether appropriate given the pair of corpses lying between the flaps of the Ducal Pavilion.




Excerpt from The Duchy of Normandy: 911 to 1078 by Drogo Zand said:
In the aftermath of the assassination of Duke William the Bastard, it appears that the Norman army was held under a fragile communal leadership consisting of Eudes de Bayeux, Robert de Beaumont and Guillaume d’Evreux until the signing of the Treaty of Kingston-upon-Thames in late November. By that time, deep rifts had appeared in the Norman high command: Eustace II of Boulogne was a laughing stock when he committed suicide, and Bishop Eudes hurried home to ensure the welfare of the Bastard’s children, who were in considerable danger from the new Duke, whoever he may be. Perhaps Eudes de Bayeux also wished to use the young Robert FitzWilliam as a pretender to the Duchy in case the new regime was unsatisfactory to him. We shall never know, for Guillaume d’Evreux beat Eudes to the Continent.

As soon as the common soldiers saw the body of their Duke, they wished to know the name of his avenger, and Guillaume seems to have been all too pleased to supply it. By the time of the Treaty, he was in the pre-eminent place amongst the signatories of charters and the like, if not the Treaty itself. He was certainly a popular leader for the citizens, and his sudden success appears to have gone to his head. He returned to Normandy alone at top speed and disseminated his version of events, claiming the Dukedom of Normandy for his own father, Richard, Count of Evreux (who had remained at home during the erstwhile invasion due to his age) via a curious reading of Salic law. For Guillaume d’Evreux, the traditional succession law of the Franks dictated that land could not only never be inherited by a woman, but also never by her descendants. By this reading, the true heir to Normandy was Richard d’Evreux, a second cousin of the Bastard, not William of Burgundy, who claimed the Duchy through his mother.

According to Orderic Vitalis, Guillaume rounded up the children of the late Duke and sent them on a fishing trip “in an unweatherly ship of many winters, with ragged sails and rotten boards, the only sailors being a brace of common thieves who had been bribed by Guillaume”. Suffice to say, they were never seen again. Now, the Count of Flanders withdrew his levies from England and took up the cause of Etienne d’Aumale, the new-born son of Duke William’s sister. Baldwin V of Flanders, as co-Regent to King Philippe of France, formally invested Etienne as Duke of Normandy on 11 January 1067 in a field outside Eu, which was being besieged by the reluctant and diseased Flemish army. However, the child of dysentery less than a week later and the whole sorry incident came to naught. Baldwin V immediately recognised Richard d’Evreux as Duke and Eudes de Bayeux was left without a solitary bargaining chip; completely outmanoeuvred.

This state of affairs continued until Duke Richard IV, who some call ‘the last competent Norman’, died of old age in July 1067, having enjoyed his unexpected status for less than six months. The succession conflict for Normandy was only just beginning.
 
Top