2018 Presidential Election

There is something I have been wondering for some time. It’s nothing important but I was just always confused by it. How do film/tv stars work in this universe?

By this I mean does the presence of a character portrayed by an actor (let’s take Rob Lowe as an example) erase any projects that that actor/actress may have done (ex. “The outsiders” in 1983)?

Does the fact that we have a character who looks like Leonard Nimoy mean that there was never a Leonard Nimoy in this universe, or do some people talk about the bizarre similarities between the two?

It was established by the West Wing show itself that celebrities do exist. It's what has been called the "Matthew Perry Rule". During season 1, Donna Moss specifically points out seeing Friends actor Matthew Perry in Los Angles. in season 4, Matthew Perry appears on the show as Joe Quincy.

So yes, to answer your question, celebrities do exist, though we do our best not to specifically mention them for continuity's sake.
 
It was established by the West Wing show itself that celebrities do exist. It's what has been called the "Matthew Perry Rule". During season 1, Donna Moss specifically points out seeing Friends actor Matthew Perry in Los Angles. in season 4, Matthew Perry appears on the show as Joe Quincy.

So yes, to answer your question, celebrities do exist, though we do our best not to specifically mention them for continuity's sake.
It gets confusing.

To quote MST3K: It's just a TV show I should really just relax.
 
Messina Wins Mayoral Election
FS2V8Sv.png

Hank Messina, former chief of staff to House Speaker Daniel Maddox, has won the Chicago mayoral election. In the second round of the vote, Messina defeated rapper and activist Mike "Thrust" Thruston after a nasty and divisive contest. Messina received 52% of the vote to Thruston's 48%. The results were racially divided, with the majority of Messina's support coming from the white and Hispanic communities, while Thruston performed best in black majority areas.

Despite exchanging acrimonious words during the campaign, both candidates have now pledged to work together for the betterment of the whole city. In his victory speech, Messina invited Thruston to continue his activist work in the city and stressed the importance of "uniting the entire city." Outgoing mayor Jack Enlow had little to say about the race, curtly stating "Hank sure will be a mayor, that much I know." After four years of corruption and incompetence, Enlow is leaving Messina a city in debt and disorder.
 
acn_hbo_the_newsroom_logo.png


Atlantis Cable News

ACN LIVE: President Seaborn to deliver address to joint session of congress


Washington D.C.- Thank you for join Atlantis Cable News' live coverage of the President's prime time address to congress. We are coming to you live from the United States capital building, where we are only moments away from what White House insiders are calling "the defining moment" of the President's term in office. We understand that the President has already arrived and his address is scheduled to begin momentarily. Stay with us
 
acn_hbo_the_newsroom_logo.png


Atlantis Cable News

ACN Live: President Seaborn National Address to Congress on Civil Rights

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of the House, Members of the Senate, my fellow Americans:

I speak to you tonight on an issue of national importance; on a matter that has been debated in our nation for far too long.

I speak tonight on the American Dream. A house with a white picket fence.

I speak tonight of going out and working hard every single day to better yourself and provide for your family.

I speak tonight about the freedom of expression, of the right to not have to hide who you are.

I speak tonight, about being able to marry the person you love. About being able to raise children with them, to grow old with them. To love them, openly.



These are fundamental American rights. Human Rights.



Yet, in the United States, after all these years, these basic rights are denied to some Americans. In 26 states, you can be fired from your job if your employer doesn’t like that you’re gay. In 32 states, same-sex couples and LGBT individuals can be denied their right to housing, be it buying or renting, solely on the basis of their sexual orientation. 16 states do not recognize anti-LGBT violence as a hate crime. In 11 states, the right of marriage is still denied to same-sex couples; some who have been together as long as 50 years. 37 states allow adoption agencies to deny the rights of same-sex parents as potential adopters or foster parents.



There are those in this country who decry “government handouts” and insist that every American needs to “pull themselves up by their bootstraps”. That’s pretty hard to do when the government is actively letting people take a scissor to those bootstraps.

And when you can still be fired from your job simply because of who you are, because of the way you were born, it becomes very hard to support and raise a family, or to own a home.

Correcting these problems is not government intrusion, it is the government’s duty.



States Rights is not a justification for injustice, and if you’re only opposition to gay marriage in Leviticus 18:22 then I’m sorry, but that isn’t good enough, not anymore.



Tomorrow morning, a new bill will be introduced into the House of Representatives, H.R. 1201: The Civil Rights Act of 2019. Its purpose is simple: to wipe away the last vestiges of legal discrimination from our great republic.



With all that I have and all that I am, I urge you to enact this bill into law. For these rights are not merely civil rights, they are human rights.



Let us not waste one more precious day, one more precious hour, in what is the most sacred of our duties as Americans: the protection of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.



Thank you, may God bless you, and God bless America



Goodnight
 

mspence

Banned
GNN US News/Politics

Swift, Strong Reactions To Civil Rights Bill

Washington-President Seaborn's address to a joint session of Congress has drawn strong reactions of both criticism and support from evangelical groups and gay rights activists as he presented a far-ranging civil rights bill aimed at ending legalized discrimination against gay, lesbian, and transgender workers, same-sex couples, and those serving in the military.
Most Democratic leaders expressed support of the bill with some bipartisan support from moderate and liberal Republicans. Prominent conservatives, including the Reverend Don Butler, expressed opposition from a mainly religious standpoint, while some Republicans planned to oppose the bill over states' rights, which Vice President Jack Hunter, himself a Republican, immediately criticized.
"We are at the threshold of a new era in civil rights legislation. Just as in 1964, there are those, including many in my own party, who are making the claim of states rights in denying their fellow Americans their basic rights-as President Seaborn said, this is a human rights issue."
Large groups of demonstrators, both in support of and against the bill, gathered outside of the Capitol building, the White House, and the Supreme Court where parts of the bill are expected to be challenged. Although there were heated words exchanged on both sides, there were no reports of violence.

Activists Call For Aid Cutoffs To Countries "Hostile" To Gay Rights

Following President Seaborn's introduction of a landmark civil rights bill before Congress, many gay and transgender rights activists are calling on the Administration to go further in combating anti-gay prejudice in other parts of the world, namely several Middle Eastern and some Asian countries where, as the leader of one activist group said, "many of our brothers and sisters have to live in fear, in hiding, or risk barbaric and medieval punishments, including torture and death by stoning, simply for who they are."
The State Department has said that it is reviewing its options for dealing with such states, which it would not directly name, which violate LGBTQ rights under existing international laws.
 
Last edited:
acn_hbo_the_newsroom_logo.png


Friday, April 5th 2019

House Democrats introduce civil rights bill; Harris leads fiery denunciation of "anti-God, anti-democratic overreach"


Washington, D.C. — One day after President Sam Seaborn's address to a joint session of Congress announcing his push for federal legislation that would outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, Democrats in the House of Representatives have introduced legislation to do just that. Chair of the House Judiciary Committee Marvin Hallifax (D-CA) submitted H.R. 1201, the Civil Rights Act of 2019, that will add those two categories to existing federal civil rights protections, which would make it illegal anywhere in the United States to discriminate against Americans based on their gender identity or sexual orientation. "We must end the scourge of discrimination in this country," Hallifax said, "While I don't for a second imagine that this will remove hate from the hearts of those who don't care about people who they think of as 'deviant' or 'disgusting' for wanting to love who they love and express who they feel they are, this is a good first step."

House Minority Leader Mitchell Harris (R-IN) took the opposite tack. "This bill is an example of an anti-God, anti-democratic overreach being rammed down the throats of Americans of faith," Harris said, in a fiery denunciation. Categorizing the legislation as one that would jail priests and pastors that cite Biblical scriptures that condemn homosexuality, Harris lambasted this bill as "dangerous, un-American social engineering". "We believe in religious liberty in this country, or at least I thought we did." the minority leader said. Several further Republicans spoke condemning the bill, including Representative Carol Goodman (R-MO) who said it was an "effort to impose coastal elitist values on decent, God-fearing Americans."

The bill heads to the Judiciary Committee, where Hallifax will oversee the debate on the issue in his role as chair. While several members of the Blue Dog Caucus of conservative-leaning Democratic representatives have privately complained to ACN about the polarizing issue possibly making their reelection campaigns in their overwhelmingly rural districts more difficult, no Democratic House member has given an indication of breaking ranks on the issue, making it almost certain that the bill will pass through the Judiciary Committee and the House onto the Republican-controlled Senate.
 
g990RZB.png


Special Feature: 2020 Senate Forecast

While there are still almost 19 months left before the 2020 midterm elections, both parties are looking long and hard at the 34 Senate seats that will be up then. Republicans are looking to keep their slim majority, the only check they have on the federal level, while Democrats are angling to give President Seaborn a friendly Congress to pass his ambitious agenda.

Courtesy of the NBS politics team, here's what you need to know about the state of each Senate race this far out:

Alabama: Cody Riley (R) (2nd term) — Perhaps the safest seat for the GOP this next cycle. The young Senate Majority Leader has more to worry about in an (unlikely) primary challenger than a Democrat taking his seat.

Alaska: Robert Cantina (R) (3rd term) — Cantina's approval ratings have dipped owing to his opposition to ballot initiatives to legalize marijuana in the state and legislation and improving access to healthcare for indigenous people. With Alaska's strong libertarian streak and large indigenous community, this makes him the most vulnerable Alaska senator in years. But with midterms favoring the party out of power, he's still the favorite even if the Democrats can recruit a strong candidate to oppose him.

Arkansas: Hubert "Arkansas" Smith (D) (1st term) — Smith is the first in a series of red-state Democrats who are going to be fighting for their lives in 2020. But unlike most of the others, he's got a strong brand (having your nickname be the state you're representing will help with that) and the Arkansas Republican Party doesn't have a particularly deep bench of Senate-caliber candidates.

California (special): Gabe Tillman (D) (1st term) — President Seaborn won't have to worry about his old Senate seat going Republican any time soon. The only question will be if term-limited Governor Abbie Heilemann will try to challenge the man she appointed for the seat for the Democratic nomination or not.

Colorado: Ben Newell (D) (1st term) — Colorado is a swing state that has backed the winning president in every presidential election since 2002, and Newell is Colorado's brightest Democratic star. He's likely to face a strong challenger, but Newell is a fundraising powerhouse and has been cited as a possible running mate for Seaborn in 2022. He's the presumptive favorite given how much Seaborn won Colorado won by in 2018 even with Green candidate Haydn Straus taking seven percent of the vote from Seaborn's left.

Delaware: Clare McAuley (D) (1st term) — Delaware's longtime Republican representative W. Robert Robertson narrowly lost last November, completing the First State's shift to becoming completely Democratic on the federal level. It will probably be decades before McAuley faces a credible challenger.

Florida: Tanner McClay (R) (1st term) — McClay barely won election in 2014 and the defeat of his fellow Republican senator Seth Randall in 2018 has made this seat one of the top targets for the Democrats in 2020. McClay hasn't been a particularly effective or high-profile senator and whoever he faces, it is going to be a slugfest.

Georgia: Charlie Forrester (R) (2nd term) — Georgia turning (or re-turning) into a purple state has been a Democratic wish since the state became firmly Republican in the Bartlet years. Demographic changes won't be fast enough to make this wish a reality by 2020, and Forrester looks like he won't have much of an issue getting a third term.

Idaho: Gina DiMeo (R) (3rd term) — Idaho is one of the reddest states in the country, and DiMeo will, in all likelihood, hold this seat until she retires.

Illinois: Mitch Bryce (D) (2nd term) — Bryce reportedly nearly jumped ship to join the Cabinet, but will have to content himself with what is likely to be an easy re-election in 2020 after political concerns (mostly that Republican Governor Theodore Lincoln Hart would appoint a Republican in his place) scuttled that possibility.

Iowa: Joe Joeckler (R) (1st term) — Even though Iowa has become increasingly Republican since Josiah Bartlet won the state twice, the Democrats view this as one of their few possible pickups in what some say looks like a rough year. Joeckler defeated a weak opponent in Lorraine Lindsay in 2014 and has done little in the way of building a brand or reputation in the state. It wouldn't be surprising for the race to become very heated as summer 2020 turns into fall.

Kansas: James Taglio (R) (5th term)The senior-most "junior" senator, Taglio won't have much to worry about if he decides to seek a sixth term.

Kentucky: Calvin Bowles (D) (4th term) — Bowles is the sole Democrat in Kentucky's congressional delegation, and Republicans are still kicking themselves over for not knocking him off in 2008, when he won reelection by less than two percent of the vote. With Kentucky even redder than it was in 2008 and Bowles getting up there in age, it's possible that he might not seek a fifth term. If that is the case, Democrats can kiss this seat goodbye.

Louisiana: Rick Remick (D) (1st term) — By all standard measures, Remick should stand no chance in 2020. But a combination of his populist image and stellar constituent service has made this race a strong possibility for a Democratic hold in 2020. Popular former governor Cole Quigley is almost certain to run for this seat, which could make this an incredibly tough contest for both parties.

Maine: Stephen Wilson (D) (4th term) — Wilson is the white whale for the National Republican Senate Committee. He's been a target in both 2008 and 2014 and walked to victory in both races. While the Republican Party's bench there isn't particularly deep, that Wilson will face a well-funded opponent should be taken as a given.

Massachusetts: Jimmy Fitzsimmons (D) (3rd term) — The Democratic leader in the Senate won't have to worry about his own reelection in 2020. Massachusetts hasn't voted for a Republican in a statewide race since former governor Tom Case won reelection in 2002 and there's no indication that trend will change in 2020.

Minnesota: Peggy Jones (D) (1st term) — Jones is the newest senator, having taken office when Jack Hunter resigned to become vice president. A relative unknown despite spending six years as lieutenant governor, Jones' biggest challenge will be introducing herself to voters and finding a way to connect with the electorate. With top candidates lining up to retake the governor's mansion in 2020 and the swing against the Republicans in 2018 in their former Twin Cities suburbs strongholds, Jones might have the wind at her back.

Mississippi: Dylan McNamara (R) (5th term) — McNamara has made noises about retiring, and reportedly doesn't see much of a future for himself with Riley (a spry 46 years of age) as party leader for the foreseeable future. Whether he runs or not, this seat is going to stay Republican.

Montana: Robert Starkey (D) (4th term) — Going by purely presidential results, Starkey shouldn't have had one term to represent Montana in Washington, much less four. But Big Sky Country has a habit of electing gun-toting liberals to represent them in both Helena and in Congress, as Starkey and at-large congressman Rick Price (D) can attest. With a huge war chest and high approval ratings, Starkey is well-equipped for the serious fight Republicans are going to give him in 2020.

Nebraska: Emmit George (R) (6th term) — Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee is a title many senators would love to have, and George aims to keep them wanting. He's been directing federal funds towards Nebraska to prevent primary challenges from ambitious up-and-comers in the Republican Party and will win a seventh term if he runs.

New Hampshire: George Englemann (D) (3rd term) — As far as purple-state opportunities for the Republicans go, none look brighter than New Hampshire. Englemann, an anemic fundraiser and someone who is more at home at town halls rather than huge campaign rallies, barely won reelection in 2014 and will require funds to survive that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee would much rather have available to keep their embattled red-state senators in office.

New Jersey: Dante Jenkins (D) (4th term) — Fun fact: besides president pro tempore Samuel Wilkinson (R-KS), who is third in line to become president, Jenkins is the only senator to have round-the-clock security owing to nearly being murdered by organized crime while he was a local prosecutor. Another fun fact: he's going to win re-election easily.

New Mexico: Andy Ritter (D) (4th term) — On paper, Ritter should be one of the most vulnerable purple-state Democrats as New Mexico went for Republicans in the last two presidential elections (albeit by less than 500 votes in 2018). However, Ritter has retained his strong links to New Mexico and benefits from former governor Rudi Vansen (I) saying he is open to running if he feels the Republicans pick an "un-electable" nominee.

North Carolina: Kenny Sattler (R) (1st term) — Sattler is the only Republican unaffected by the state's court-ordered redistricting of its congressional maps before the 2020 election and he also has little to fear from a Democratic party that (understandably) seems to be focusing more on the House side of things in the Tarheel State than his seat.

Oklahoma: Bradley Denning (D) (1st term) — The story of Denning turning a 70-point polling deficit against an incumbent senator in deep red Oklahoma into a 12-point electoral victory is one that political junkies will repeat for decades after Denning leaves the Senate. Which, sadly for him, might be next year. Oklahoma is extremely conservative (Henry Shallick received nearly two-thirds of all votes cast there), and it's only Denning's incredibly deep pockets and family name (his father is a popular former governor and his grandfather founded Denning Energy) that give him a serious shot at holding onto his seat. The Republicans are itching to take back a seat they consider theirs and Denning will need every scrap of money and goodwill he can get if he hopes to win re-election.

Oregon: Curtis Ryan (R) (1st term) — Would Ryan have won in 2014 if his opponent hadn't been Ricky Rafferty, a woman who had antagonized almost everyone within her own party and who less than a year after losing, joined the Socialist Party? Perhaps, perhaps not. Either way, he's probably the most endangered Republican incumbent heading into 2020, standing at the top of every Democrat's target list.

Rhode Island: Jim Velasquez (D) (1st term) — Velasquez won't have to compete much, if at all, to win re-election in deep blue Rhode Island.

South Carolina: Sam McCord (D) (1st term) — Sam McCord spent two years with his brother Tim in the Senate before Tim narrowly lost re-election by less than 400 votes in 2016. Now, the younger brother is similarly embattled and hasn't succumbed to his brother's presumption in the deep-seated attachment Palmetto State voters have for (some) local Democrats. Since 2016, McCord has been stockpiling an impressive campaign chest and has been working to separate himself from the national party on hot-button issues. Regardless, he still has an uphill fight to overcome South Carolina's trend towards electing Republicans at all levels of government.

South Dakota: Jim Simon (R) (2nd term) — Simon has had a long Senate career, having first been elected in 1990, then retiring in 2002, before coming out of retirement to defeat Democratic leader and future vice president Wendell Tripplehorn in 2008. But it's almost certain that he's hanging up his spurs. Simon is going to be 84 next year and while he hasn't formally announced whether he's going to run again or not, it is clear that the state Republican Party wants him to exit gracefully. Either way, whoever holds this seat after January 2021 is going to be a Republican given South Dakota's partisan lean.

Tennessee: Patrick Stacy (R) (4th term) — If there's any silver lining for Democrats that know that this seat will stay Republican in a year's time, it's that Stacy, who has shown plenty of willingness to trade votes and buck the party line when it suits him, will be the one to hold it (if he wants to).

Texas: Mark Cumberland (R) (2nd term) — The Democrats could try to persuade a heavyweight like former First Lady Helen Santos to take a shot at flipping this seat, but in a midterm with a Democratic president and several vulnerable Democrats in red states, it would be a waste of time and money. It wouldn't be surprising if Cumberland topped his 30-percent margin of victory that he racked up in 2014.

Virginia: Lou Thornton (D) (1st term) — Republicans have become enthused about flipping this seat by the narrow victory of former governor Rob Buchanan over incumbent Brandon Jeffries last November. But their optimism might be misplaced. Virginia shifted dramatically away from the Republican presidential ticket in 2018, voting for a Democrat for the first time since 1964, and Buchanan was by far the highest quality candidate the Virginia GOP had available. While this won't be a cakewalk for either party, Thornton is the slight favorite at this point.

West Virginia: Rachel Mears (D) (1st term) — Mears owed her election to an incredibly unpopular incumbent in former senator Charles Oakley and a Democratic presidential candidate that narrowly carried the state. Neither of those will be the case in 2020, with President Seaborn recording the lowest vote-share by any Democratic presidential candidate in West Virginia since George McClellan in 1864. While Mears has tried to differentiate herself from the president, it probably won't be enough in a state that is rapidly trending Republican for national votes.

Wyoming: Kent Harris (R) (3rd term) — Harris won over 80 percent of the vote in 2014 and both Henry Shallick and Wyoming's other senator, Herman Morton, won over 70 percent in their respective races. It will be newsworthy if Democrats can crack 35 percent statewide here.
 
New set of infoboxes, this time some of the women of TWW who haven't had their infoboxes done:

878VF0d.png

Casting (all previously established)
Kathleen York as Andrea Wyatt
Teri Polo as Helen Santos
Emily Procter as Ainsley Hayes
Marlee Matlin as Joey Lucas

  • Andy's DOB, like that of all the ladies in this set, is taken from her actor. Her date of marriage to Toby has been listed in his infobox. While it's never said what her career was before she became a politician, I've had her be a lawyer (essentially the default occupation for politicians).
  • Helen Santos' maiden name was listed in President Santos' box. Her birthplace is the same as Teri Polo's, and my backstory for her is that she's from Delaware and went to college in UC-Irvine, where she met Air Force officer Matt Santos, who was stationed nearby. The two courted and after Matt returned from the Persian Gulf, the two married and moved to Matt's hometown of Houston and then he began his political career.
  • Ainsley's middle name is a reference to Emily Procter's character on CSI: Miami. Her predecessors and successors as WH Counsel are my creations. Before anyone asks, she's last been mentioned to be a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, hence her residence being listed.
  • The reason Joey Lucas is born in the same city as Richard Nixon is that, like Nixon, she was mentioned as being a Quaker. The only real things I'm adding is specifying which degrees she obtained at which universities (she mentioned where she went to school in the show), and her firm's name.
 
What is Wyatt up to now anyway? I imagine she probably teaches international relations at some Ivy League school or serves as dean/chancellor of some university.
 
g990RZB.png


Monday, April 8th 2019

Congressional leaders say there will likely be no budget resolution

With one week before Congress' April 15th deadline to approve a budget resolution, leaders from both the House of Representatives and the Senate say that it is likely that the two chambers will fail to agree upon a budget resolution for the next fiscal year, with each blaming the other for the impasse. House Majority Leader Noah Gellman (D-VA) said that there is "too large of a divide" for the Democrat-controlled House and the Republican-controlled Senate to bridge before next week. "We've been banging our heads together with the White House and Senate leadership, and haven't got very far," Gellman said. "I don't like to point fingers, but the failure of the Senate leadership to negotiate in good faith with us on this issue is heartbreaking."

Senate Majority Leader Cody Riley (R-AL) fired back, saying that the House's proposals were "too radical" for his members to stomach. "We really did try to find common ground to negotiate on, but the president's irresponsible, free-spending budget that the House leadership wanted as a starting point is just too beyond the pale for those of us who value fiscal responsibility and limited government."

If no budget resolution passes, the last resolution that was ratified by both houses of Congress, the fiscal year 2017 budget resolution, will continue to be the one Congress uses as a blueprint for the appropriations process. No budget resolution was passed in the final two years of the Walken administration after Republicans retook the Senate in 2016 while the Democrats retained control of the House.

Congressional insiders say a few planks of President Seaborn's ambitious budget proposal have already been dropped or have been reduced in scope during negotiations, with the most notable being the $750 billion demand for infrastructure spending being whittled down to $200 billion in the latest round of talks between the White House and Congress. Other items, such as an increase in relief for farmers affected by natural disasters, funding for a national blue-ribbon panel on education reform and a slight increase in the Department of Defense budget, have all reportedly been agreed to in principle by all parties involved in negotiations.
 
This set is a bit sad, because it features three actors who have passed since the show aired:

6LhO8Wt.png


Casting (all show cast)
Roger Rees as John Marbury, the Marquess of Needham and Dolby
Ron Silver as Bruno Gianelli
Kathryn Joosten as Dolores Landingham

  • The show completely botched Marbury's titles, given the ones he listed: "John, Lord Marbury, Earl of Croy, Marquess of Needham and Dolby, Baronet of Brycey". None of those would result in him being styled "Lord John Marbury" except if he were the younger son of a duke or marquess. So I've had to create a retcon that Marbury correctly listed his titles, but because he's eccentric as hell, he insisted that his old styling be used after he became Marquess of Needham and Dolby (and assume that his unnamed older brother predeceased their father) and no one in either the UK or US government really cared enough to fight him on it.

    His post-ambassadorial career was given that he was "president of the World Trade Organization", but the WTO doesn't have a president. So a slight retcon to those 7+ year old posts establishing him as WTO president.

    I had Marbury be born where Rees himself was born with the excuse that Marbury's family was evacuated during the Blitz and didn't return to their family estates until the threat of German bombing finally disappeared in late 1944.
  • Bruno's backstory was never really elaborated upon (other than him stating he'd been involved in politics for 24 years by 2002, i.e. started in 1978). Since Ron Silver has a clear New York accent, I had Bruno's background mirror his actor's somewhat.

    His photo is an old one both IRL and IU because, sadly, 2009 was the year Silver died.
  • Mrs. Landingham's exact age wasn't established, so I had to do some extrapolating. Her sons were killed in Vietnam on Christmas Eve, 1970, after being drafted as medics after their second year of medical school. That puts them at approximately 24-25 when they were killed, so I had Mrs. Landingham being around 21-22 when they were born for a birth year of 1924. Which makes her a pretty elderly 76 when she is tragically killed in a car accident (and quite a bit older than her actress, since Kathryn Joosten was 61 when Mrs. Landingham was killed off). But it kind of can't be helped, considering that it's implied with the flashback to when she and Bartlet met that she was significantly older than him (being married and portrayed by a woman in her early thirties while Bartlet is a senior in prep school) and Joosten is in reality only eight months older than Martin Sheen.

    Her birthplace is the same as Joosten's and Landingham's maiden name is a reference to Joosten's other famous role, on Desperate Housewives. Her husband was named and mentioned to have fought in Korea, but never appeared and had died before Bartlet decided to/was convinced by Leo to run for president. I had them get married just the year before their sons were born, with the implication that he was in training away from the future Mrs. Landingham when World War II ended and married when he was able to leave after the war's end.
 
Here is a quote each from the above, all wonderful characters

"Gerald!!!"

Bruno Gianelli: Look, they don't know it yet. You are the best thing to ever happen to them. You're moving the Republicans away from the right wing. You're not saying Democrats are not patriotic. You're just saying that your approach is better. You are making politics a fair fight again. What? You think I'm a spy, I snuck in here, I'm trying to steer you wrong?
Arnold Vinick: The thought has crossed my mind.
Bruno Gianelli: I have spent the last 20 years ripping this country apart. Finding wedge issues to separate the voters. You don't have to do that to win. Not this time. You do this right, you can do a lot more than win. You can stop using politics to divide this country. You can show us how much we agree, instead of how much we disagree. You can put this country back together.

Delores Landingham: You know, if you don't want to run again, I respect that. But if you don't run cause you think it will be too hard or you think you're going to lose, well, God, Jed, I don't even want to know you.
 
g990RZB.png


Josh Lyman's reaction to bizarre question goes viral


Former White House chief of staff and chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Josh Lyman, who was seriously wounded when two white supremacists shot at President Josiah Bartlet and his entourage in Rosslyn, Virginia in 2000, appeared before Congress today in a hearing on white supremacist violence that did not go as anyone expected. Lyman, who testified to his own experiences with white supremacists, including anti-Semitic hate mail he received while chief of staff to President Matthew Santos that resulted in his Secret Service protection being extended for a few months after he left that job to become DNC chair and urged members of the House Judiciary Committee to provide "as much money as you can spare" to law enforcement agencies that monitored those groups, whose numbers have grown in the past ten years after the 2007-8 recession.

But the moment that has gone viral took place when Representative Daniel Wellsley (R-CO) used the opportunity to ask Lyman about the civil rights bill that would make it illegal to discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity in the United States. Lyman appeared somewhat confused by the line of questioning, but offered his thoughts on the bill, stating he approved of it. Wellsley then asked, after saying President Seaborn's "late" marriage (Seaborn married First Lady Lauren Seaborn-Parker when he was 41) with no children was "suspicious", if he thought the president had a "personal" reason for pushing for a bill that would "make it illegal to call homosexuality a sin". Lyman's expressions, as captured by C-SPAN, go quickly from confusion to surprise to disbelief and has already been making rounds on social media.

Lyman started to answer, but Chair Marvin Hallifax (D-CA), known on Capitol Hill for his quick temper and harangues opponents, cut him off and spent the next minute lambasting Wellsley for "wasting this committee's time with a set of bigoted, ignorant and stupid questions", and said that he had warned Wellsley, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan who was tried but not convicted, of the murder of four LGBT people outside a Colorado gay bar in the 1990s, that he would not tolerate "this kind of crap" and ordered Wellsley to leave the hearing. After the congressman left, Hallifax apologized for his "un-parliamentary language" and asked Lyman to "ignore that last question."

Asked about the hearing later, Lyman quipped "I thought they wanted to hear about me getting shot, not...whatever that was. For the record, the reason Sa-the president married late is because he was busy helping me run President Santos' White House. Believe me, there's a reason I'm not the First Lady's favorite person."

--------------------------------------------
eNQxUwvm.png


Final election results: Likud emerges as largest party, but faces daunting task building coalition

Prime Minister Gilad Doron has led his Likud party to an increase of six seats in the Knesset, with the final results from Wednesday's vote now in. Likud will again be the largest party in the Knesset, holding 36 of the 120 seats, but what looks like at the expense of minor parties on the right wing, making it likely that the country will see prolonged coalition negotiations. Doron inherited a slim majority when former prime minister Efraim Zahavy was rendered comatose by a stroke in October, and with the last results in, it appears that he will need at least one of the two centrist parties that formed the main basis of opposition to continued Likud rule.

The right wing, including both secular and religious parties, has won 57 seats, with the center and left-wing taking 49. The remaining 14 seats have been taken by Arab-interest parties, both of which were preemptively rejected for coalition membership by Benny Latz, leader of Kadima, the largest centrist party, which won 24 seats, the most behind Likud. Latz, a retired general in the IDF and political novice, came the closest in a decade to toppling Likud, but will not likely have a chance to try to form a coalition of his own. Shaul Cohen, leader of the centrist Hosen party that won 13 seats, has already said he would "entertain any genuine offers" from Doron and Likud to joining a potential coalition.

While Doron might be able to cobble together a coalition of at least 61 members of the Knesset to form a government, his premiership has been damaged by his attempt to get the far-right Otzema Yehudit into the Knesset, which drew international condemnation owing to Otzema Yehudit's history as the descendant of the outlawed Kach party who has been designated as a terrorist organization by several countries, including Israel itself. Polling taken after the news of Doron's behind-the-scenes maneuvers to avoid wasting right-wing votes dropped his personal approval numbers and that Doron trailed Latz in preferred prime minister polls for most the race as a result. The alliance Otzema Yehudit joined, the United Right, failed to cross the 3.25% threshold for entry into the Knesset.

--------------------------------------------
200px-BBC_World_News_red.svg.png


China announces planned withdrawal from Qumar

The People's Republic of China will withdraw its troops from Qumar after the country's elections in July, according to a spokesman for the People's Liberation Army (PLA). President Qian Min said that he has ordered General Wu Zoucheng, commander of the roughly 120,000 Chinese troops stationed in Qumar, to begin planning for an "orderly departure" from the small Middle Eastern nation after the July elections and a new government is established. "The brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army, alongside their partners in the American and British forces, have prevented a terrorist organization from taking over a nation which lies in the vital straits to the Persian Gulf," Qian said, announcing the move. "Now it will be time for the new Qumari government to stand on its own as a member of the international community."

Qian said that it will continue to provide logistical support to Qumar and plans to finance the rebuilding of the highway connecting the capital Jabal Nafusah to other major cities in Qumar. But the withdrawal reportedly comes after strong British and American pressure to keep a sizable portion of troops in Qumar after the handover to an elected Qumari government. "We will, of course, maintain our troop strength in Qumar throughout the summer," Defence Secretary Kevin Grimes said. "The commitment of the international community to maintaining a free and independent Qumar remains unbroken."

It is no secret, however, that the removal of the PLA will put a significant strain on the other nations who have soldiers in Qumar, especially with Iran still occupying large parts of northern Qumar and refusing to renounce its claims to the small Gulf nation. Lieutenant general Lloyd Battersea (ret.), said that he expects British troops will face an "emboldened" enemy with the news. "Bahji guerrillas in the hinterlands know that the combat readiness of international forces will be affected by a Chinese withdrawal and the hand-over of the 'Chinese sector' to either an inexperienced Qumari army or new group of international soldiers will give the Bahji a greater advantage in the remote areas where they remain." Battersea said that it is likely that the Bahji will escalate attacks on international troop bases and convoys to gain recruits before a "legitimate" Qumari government will take away their ability to portray themselves as Qumari freedom fighters, a tactic that experts say has led to their ability to continue recruiting Qumari men and boys three years into the conflict.

zfxCPo7.png

The situation in Qumar

--------------------------------------------
[*]TTL's Kadima and Hosen are not the exact same parties as OTL, but generally have the same beliefs as their OTL counterparts.
[*]I made this map of Qumar since the only one previously made was clearly just Qumar's cities placed on top of Hormozgan Province. Which, while it makes up most of where Qumar is supposed to be, looks nothing like Qumar as it was depicted on a map in the show.
[*]Most of the areas the Bahji are labeled to be in are extremely mountainous and thus difficult for anyone (Qumari, Iranian, American, British, Chinese) to completely pacify.
 
warned Wellsley, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan who was tried but not convicted, of the murder of four LGBT people outside a Colorado gay bar in the 1990s, that he would not tolerate "this kind of crap" and ordered Wellsley to leave the hearing.

I’m just wondering how Wellsley got elected (and according to a previous post is one of the most popular congressmen in the country) with his Klan background and an accused mass murder? Did he give everyone a puppy or something?
 
I’m just wondering how Wellsley got elected (and according to a previous post is one of the most popular congressmen in the country) with his Klan background and an accused mass murder? Did he give everyone a puppy or something?

I'd say the the same way Steve King did- win a divided Republican primary for the nomination in a deep-red seat and leverage your popularity with enough hardcore conservatives in your state to prevent any serious effort at a primary challenge.
 
I'd say the the same way Steve King did- win a divided Republican primary for the nomination in a deep-red seat and leverage your popularity with enough hardcore conservatives in your state to prevent any serious effort at a primary challenge.
But Steve King didn’t do anything really terrible until he was elected. This man was accused of murdering four people and belonged to a hate group before announcing his candidacy.
 
But Steve King didn’t do anything really terrible until he was elected. This man was accused of murdering four people and belonged to a hate group before announcing his candidacy.

So? He was acquitted and it's not like the Republican Party in a district that voted for Tom Tancredo in 2010 (when Tancredo lost by 15% statewide) is going to have a plurality of voters who won't countenance supporting someone who was once tried for an anti-gay hate crime.

This is also a time to point to the "fun" fact that the OTL former leader of the Ku Klux Klan who had openly affiliated with Neo-Nazis won a majority of white voters in Louisiana in 1991, so being a former KKK member in certain parts of the country isn't the electoral poison that it should be.
 
Top