Yeah, but all save car v train just require a hose and some sponges.Unless you get Human/car/animal V train which I can assure is a very messy business.
Car, OTOH....
Yeah, but all save car v train just require a hose and some sponges.Unless you get Human/car/animal V train which I can assure is a very messy business.
Sure, top speed is flashy. But won't there be a large backlash in a few years if actual trip times don't change much? Especially if fare go up to cover the higher cost train sets? Seems like an odd focus.
Speeds of freight trains would be overall speeds, not top speeds. And, in addition, are likely slower than the lighter passenger trains. I don't see how that helps with increasing the top speed of passenger trains, at all. UNLESS what you meant was the freight lines were doing the nitty gritty work of reducing curves, so Albo doesn't get burnt as badly by his misplaced focus. but that's not what it sounds like what you meant.
'scoured' I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Collisions don't come under the heading of 'weather'.Unless you get Human/car/animal V train which I can assure is a very messy business.
Collisions don't come under the heading of 'weather'.
Only because they're allowed to share airports. I bet if each airline had to maintain its own airports flying would get really expensive really fast.Part of it is going to be cost. You have to find a way to keep costs down. Here in the US (at least on the East corridor between Boston and Washington, DC), travelling by AMTRAK isn't much cheaper than flying.
Only because they're allowed to share airports. I bet if each airline had to maintain its own airports flying would get really expensive really fast.
Um, IIRC the Ghan was running clean to Darwin back in 2004, so shouldn't it be included on that map?