2010 US Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
s-CNN-LOGO-large.jpg

Congressman Skinner on the "Youth in Revolt."

Congressman and Senatorial Candidate from Vermont Matthew Skinner made a few comment about the so-called "Youth in Revolt."

"You know I respect a lot of what their doing, and it is definitely a new-progressive way of thinking that will eventually be the modern thinking for this country. But right now, especially after today's events in New York City, I can't support them. They are trying to do things to quickly for the rest of the country. They'll have their time, in say 10-15-20 years from now. But right now, in the midst of a Presidential Election, this isn't the time for them to try and start their generations revolution. Thanks, I gotta go though."

The Congressman was referring to an incident that is still not really cleared up that occurred at a rally in New York this morning. It is known that 5 people were arrested, for unknown charges. We will keep you up-to-date on that as well.
 
DenverPostLogo.png



Another old-time, far-right republican may have a rude awakening this fall. But for Senior Senator of Colorado Jack Moseley, it won't be just a democrat giving him a headache in the coming campaign season. He has a strong challenge for the nomination in his own party. Moseley, a very vital member of the Republican Senate Leadership, is preparing to fight like he has never before done. In his first four terms in the Senate, he never faced a true significant threat in the primaries. That's the past, because now, he most certainly does.

The Senator will be challenged by a very moderate Republican in Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, Carlos Cabrera, an added bonus for the fall as it takes away the minority card the democrats tend to through at the republicans.

Cabrera, is actually very liberal, for a republican. Socially-wise he is liberal, he is for universal health care, abortions rights, gay rights, and anything else on the list of social issues you can find, he'll be on the left of them. He is also staunchly fiscally conservative. He's made speeches about on personal liberty and economic liberty all being part of our universal liberty guaranteed to us as Americans. He has been very vocal critic of the reactionary and religious wings of his party, and how it is attempting to undermine a real political body as a way to spread the word of god.

Regardless of who wins in the Republican nomination, they will face up against Congresswomen Camille Aubry of the Colorado 1st. A hardcore liberal, and a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, she has a deep war chest she's built up in Denver, and plans to use it in November. She is the presumptive nominee. She has received the endorsements of many prominent democrats. Including former President Bartlet, Senator Andrew Thorn of New York, Senator Lloyd Russell of New Mexico, but the name that has gotten her the most attention, is Jackson Kennedy. She has embraced the liberal movement he has been speaking about, and has found herself in the midst of rallies for the Youth in Revolt. We will see how she does this fall, but she has a better chance of winning against Moseley than she does against Cabrera. And that's not something you would normally say about a challenger going up against a 4-term incumbent.

The primary for both parties is on August 10th, less than a month away. With Cabrera pulling himself into the margin of error soon, you'd wonder why no one he is still acting like he has another two years before its time to get reelected.


Brad+Leland+3.png


Brad Leland as Senator Jack Moseley


lin.jpg


Lin-Manuel Miranda as Carlos Cabrera


3way_melissa-theuriau.jpg


Melissa Theuriau as Congresswomen Camille Aubry
 
Last edited:
KahukaMan, McDiarmid's already been cast as British politician Sir George Kelvan (I have a photographic memory with regards to unimportant things). You seem to be fond of casting so I won't denigrate your creativity there, but it throws away my suspension of disbelief when two characters are played by the some actor or recasting happens too often (I'm trying to imagine a TV series universe happening in the background of our posts).

I've been swamped lately elsewhere, and apologize for my sporadic and seldom posting these last few weeks. I'm trying to step it up here soon, and be in full gear ASAP.
 
Newredstate.png

redstate.com

Jasper Irving (R-IL) to release novel

Recent reports have indicated that United States Congressman Jasper Irving, representative from the 10th district of Illinois, will release his long-awaited novel next week, following an exclusive review that will be syndicated among numerous newspapers this weekend.

Irving, the 48-year-old former executive with Allstate insurance, had gained fame in recent weeks in his attempts to defuse a gaffe from the Republican nominee Glen Allen Walken. Irving is immensely popular in his district, with approval ratings in the mid-sixties.

Among conservatives, many are expecting this to be an revived Conscience of a Conservative, and with several of the issues on the table this election, it would certainly help.
 
BBC.CO.UK/NEWS

Friday July 16th

Conservatives win Windsor by-election

The Conservatives cruised to a comfortable win in the Windsor by-election yesterday.
The election caused by the resignation of former leader James Taylor in May, did not harm the candidate 37 year old lawyer, Adam Jackson.
RESULT
Adam Jackson Conservative 30,654
Sarah Elliott, Liberal Democrat 12,328
Derek Reeves, Labour 5,219
Andrew Harris, National Democrats 1,964
Adam Gray, National Peoples Party, 1,089
Peter Bradshaw, Green Party, 612
Majority: 18,326
 


Friday July 16th

LASTEST ELECTION MAP
genusmap.php

Solid Walken=200NO CHANGE
Lean Walken=68+30
Total Walken=268+30
Solid Santos=140+10
Lean Santos=49-10
Total Santos=189 NO CHANGE
Toss-up=81-30

NATIONAL POLL
  1. Walken 50%
  2. Santos 46%
  3. Hall 4%
 
KahukaMan, McDiarmid's already been cast as British politician Sir George Kelvan (I have a photographic memory with regards to unimportant things). You seem to be fond of casting so I won't denigrate your creativity there, but it throws away my suspension of disbelief when two characters are played by the some actor or recasting happens too often (I'm trying to imagine a TV series universe happening in the background of our posts).

I've been swamped lately elsewhere, and apologize for my sporadic and seldom posting these last few weeks. I'm trying to step it up here soon, and be in full gear ASAP.


It has been edited. As to my like of casting, while yes I do, yesterday's giant casting session was influence by a number of things. Mark told me a few people he wouldn't mind being cast, and I had that (the rally and arrests) planned for the next few days, so I just moved it up.
 
the_nation_logo.jpg


Following the Senate Races

By Nate Bradshaw


So we all know about the 2010 Presidential Election and all that jazz. But here is The Nation's outlook on the Senatorial Elections this fall.

In California you have well-known former Presidential aide, Sam Seaborne going up against a legacy in Richard Lassiter, son of former President Owen Lassiter. While Lassiter has made the campaign interesting, and kept Seaborne on his toes, it is unlikely he wins the seat. His father was governor during a different time period, when California wasn't so left-leaning. Seaborne represents the future of California, and maybe even this country, so while he has had to fight for his life in a few tough spots, it is very likely he wins. A likely democratic win.

In Hawaii, despite it being home to the beginning of the splintering of the democratic party, whoever wins the nomination will also win the seat. The smart money right now is on David Kuhio, mayor of Honolulu, he is immensely popular in the state's capital city, and has shown a very liberal side to himself. Neither GOP candidate really has the ability to win, State Senate Minority Leader Sarah Sloan is more moderate than former CEO Paul Snider, but she is also trailing by about 3 points in the polls. Even if she did win the nomination, she has almost no chance of beating Kuhio. It will be a safe democratic win.

Colorado has only recently become a Swing state, and it will be tested in this election. However, Senator Jack Moseley, a leading member of the Republican's Senate Leadership, is acting like he has nothing to fear, still going to bars with his buddies, and talking to his best friend Pat Bowlen, who happens to be the owner of the Denver Broncos, everyday. But in actuality, he has much to fear. He needs to stop acting like he has it in the bag, and get back to campaigning. Not only does he have a stiff opponent from the democrats in Congresswomen Camille Aubry, but in his own party, State Secretary of State Carlos Cabrera has been gaining ground in the polls. It seems likely that Moseley will still win the GOP nomination, but he will have to fight for his life against Aubry. Polls of him against Cabrera have him leading 51-44, but against Aubry, he leads by a very slim margin of 48-46. This senate race may also play a role in the Presidential election, but for now, it remains a tossup.

A race that the republicans will likely win, is Florida. Popular governor, Eric Swenson is the presumptive Republican nominee, running against either John Tandy or Umberto Guerra. Tandy is the likely democratic nominee, leading in the polls 50-41 against Guerra. However, he is trailing Swenson 49-42. Tandy may be just a tad too liberal for the state, he has made it public that he supports the legalization of marijuana, a position that Swenson has hit him hard on. The primary is in early August, and Tandy has been pushing for at least one statewide televised debate. However Swenson seems to be playing the same game that his predecessor to the governorship, Robert Ritchie, played during the 2002 Presidential Election. Making his intentions clear that he does not want to have a debate. Which has given Tandy something to fight with. However, this is still a likely republican win.

In Ohio, many people, democrats and republicans alike, assumed that one-term Senator Thomas Ford would hold onto the seat without much of a struggle. However, a few weeks before the primary contest, it was made public that he had an extramarital affair with a campaign staffer, and withdrew from the competition. Leaving it wide open for both parties. In the Republican Party, Caroline McIntosh a former Congresswomen and CEO of Pepsi, won the nomination. While in the Democratic Party, the self-proclaimed democratic socialist Hayden Straus won the nomination. This has put both parties in an awkward position, for the Republicans, McIntosh is too moderate for the conservative base, and has many worried they won't show up on election day. While the democrats worry that Straus is too-liberal for the moderates to show up on election day. But in general, the middle ground wins over the far left or far right, and this is shown with McIntosh's lead 43-39 in the polls. For now it seems to be a probable republican win, but it soon could become a tossup if the Straus camp can continue its effective campaigning.

The last state I'll cover in this article is a surprise to pretty much everyone. In Pennsylvania, the Republicans weren't even paying attention to the race, this time last year Senate Majority Leader, Robert Royce was assured a reelection landslide. That was until Congressman Stephen Collins of the Pennsylvania 7th won the democratic nomination and began campaigning in earnest. Hitting Royce from the left and the right, Collins has somehow managed to pull himself into a tie in the polls with Royce. What scares Republicans is how quickly he managed it. Just a few weeks ago, he was still 6 points down, but his aggressive campaigning and keen sense for politics has helped him out quite a bit. Royce will need to act fast if he hopes to still be employed after January 20, 2011. For now though, its a tossup.

The Nation is happy to give coverage on the different races going on in the country this year, and will continue to do so until election day.
 
hd_logo.gif

Hoosier Senate Race Heating Up, Matteo V. Barkley
by Matthew Evans.

With most of the air focused on the upcoming Presidential election and the so-called "Youth in Revolt," some other contests have been tossed aside. One of them is the Senate race in Indiana, where State Treasurer Damon Matteo will face off against former Congressman Frank Barkley.

Matteo has the obvious advantage in this race-He didn't have to deal with a divided primary, and the party has united behind him fully. Barkley had to deal with Bryant Micklewhite's attacks, and the threat of Ray Petersen's money. Barkley barely won-46% to Micklewhite's 38%, Petersen getting 16%. Micklewhite hasn't endorsed Barkley, and isn't likely too, as there is bad blood between the two of them.

Meanwhile, Petersen is talking about an Independent run for the Senate. While it's unlikely that he would win, he has the cash and name recognition to take votes from Barkley, votes that might be needed in what will be a very close race with Matteo.

Matteo himself hasn't put a foot wrong in the election-He defeated Sarah Lipton without a lot of effort, has built a comfortable war chest of $6.8 million, and is prepping for the general election. Matteo is the perfect Democratic fit for Indiana-Socially moderate and fiscally conservative, doesn't have anything odd or scary in his background. He's pro-life, anti-tax, and pro-gun(Surprisingly, he's for allowing civil unions and, in limited, gay marriage. The reason? His brother is gay). But Matteo does have some economic populism in him-He's a supporter of unions, and argued for more favorable trade conditions for American workers.

As Treasurer, Matteo grew the state's investment portfolio, and is one of the reasons that, even with the economic downturn, the Hoosier State hasn't been as badly affected as others. Even Stephen Kendrick, the economically-minded, Republican Governor of Indiana, has said, "I'm really glad that Indiana, and myself, have Damon Matteo. He's an excellent Treasurer, and things probably would have been worse without him."

With the electoral map shifting every day, Indiana could be a battleground, and the contest between Matteo and Barkley could be a pivotal one in deciding how the state turns.

matt_damon.jpg

Matt Damon as Indiana State Treasurer Damon Matteo.
 
Last edited:
ooc: I find the casting of Damon as a social moderate fiscal conservative as hysterical, considering he is probably the most liberal big name actor in hollywood. Just a funny little comment. :)
 
*Bows* Thank you and you're welcome.

What I find really funny is that he plays badass roles for the most part-Jason Bourne, the Departed, a few others I'm sure I'm missing.
 
news.gif


Talks Progress "Less Than Stellar"

afp_logo_51.png


by P.A. Valentin - July 17, 2010

JABAL NAFUSAH, Qumar (AFP) - An insider source at talks between US Secretary of State Arnold Vinick and Prime Minster Zuben Ahmed has revealed that the talks have not yielded the process expected by the Americans.

Vinick had made a surprise trip to the Qumari capital at the behest of President Santos to settle a variety of issues: nuclear proliferation, human rights, peace in the region, ongoing United States involvement in Israel, as well as the relationship between Qumar and the British commonwealth.

In the United States, Matthew Santos faces a re-election challenge from former Acting President Glen Allen Walken, and recent polls have indicted Santos' weakness in the realm of foreign affairs. Democratic insiders have speculated the Santos sent Vinick to Qumar to polish a weakening resume.

However, an aide to Prime Minster Zuben suggested to Agence France-Presse that talks with Vinick were "struggling" and that overall process was "far less than stellar." The aide also implied that there would be no major outcome of these talks.

According to American spokesmen, the talks are scheduled to end early next week.
 


Saturday July 17th

Rumours suggest that Carter will pick Barker as Party Chairman if he wins leadership on Tuesday

There are strong rumours from inside the Andrew Carter camp, that he win choose his rivial Edward Barker as the new party Chairman if he wins the Conservative leadership ballot on Tuesday.
It looks like that the result could be a lot closer than many where expecting, but it does look like Carter will will, although it looks like it could be a narrow victory.
Supporters of Edward Barker, say that if he does lose than he has to be given a major role in the Shadow Cabinet, and if he is ignored than it will spilit the party not unite it.
The result is expected Tuesday afternoon.
 
san-francisco-chronicle-logo-175.gif


Who else in the Revolution?

By Parker LaRouche


We have heard about Andrew Thorn. We have heard about Stephen Collins. And boy howdy, have we heard about Jackson Kennedy. All of these liberals, along with a few others, have been dubbed the future of their party. While it seems likely that Matthew Santos will not be reelected, the liberals seem poised to take back control of their party, something they haven't had for four years since President Bartlet left office. To do this the big names, such as the afore mentioned Andrew Thorn, Senator George Montgomery, former California Governor Gabe Tillman among others have reached out to the younger liberals in colleges and people who are leading political activists in big urban cities. Which is how people like Collins, Kennedy, and Kuhio have high-levels of national attention, and are now getting named with Thorn and Montgomery as the future of their party. But as much as you've heard about them, what about the others across the country? You've started hearing about others such as Nicole Kershaw, the Mayor of San Francisco, Hayden Straus the democratic candidate for Senate in Ohio, and a few others, but this is a more in-depth look at some of the other liberals that may play a role in the future of American politics.

Nicole Kershaw with her consistent campaigning for Sam Seaborne, and denouncing of Richard Lassiter's political position has given her some national attention. Her strong socially-liberal positions have given her good looking approval numbers in one of the country's most liberal cities, and recent polling in California has shown that 58% of Californians would approve of her running for higher office. And its very likely that she will. With Senator Mark Kerrison's dreams of becoming a screenwriter likely to play a role in his decision to run for reelection in 2012, Kershaw would likely be a frontrunner for the democratic nomination. However, she hasn't made any announcement on the matter. She has declared her support for the Youth in Revolt, claiming that the fact that the youth are starting to care about their country is "riveting." I think it is safe to say that she will run for Senate in 2012, it is just a matter of when she plans on announcing it.

Hayden Straus represents a fusion of the old with the new. He is 56 years old, and has no real political experience behind him, except for years of talking about how bad the republican party has become because it has been taken over by the religious, reactionary right. He is a self-described democratic socialist, which brings a new meaning to liberal. By adding that one little word, "socialist" he scares off a lot of moderates and independents. But despite this, he has done remarkably well in Ohio polling wise, and remains only four points behind his opponent in Caroline McIntosh. He has been a great advocate of the liberal movement, and was a great supporter of President Bartlet. Despite being a member of the democratic party, he has no reservations about stating his disagreements with his party. The most well known example of this is that he has made it public, he has no intention of voting for Matthew Santos for President this year.

In New York, you've heard about Andrew Thorn, Michael Dashowitz, and even Mark Richardson, but one who hasn't drawn as much attention is Congressman James Gatsby of the New York 5th. Gatsby is 64 years old, and has been serving in his seat for the past 12 years, but has never sought the major political spotlight. He has served on the Armed Services Committee, Ways and Means, and Foreign Affairs, but has recently been announced as a possible candidate for House Majority Whip, or possibly the Chairmanship of the Foreign Relations Committee. He has declined to state whether or not he plans on working for either of these positions, but his support of Speaker Gelsey has probably earned him some political currency with the new leadership.

Kelly Phelps is a name that not many have heard of, and likely without a little work, won't for the next two years. Phelps is the State Insurance Commissioner of Michigan. At only 37 years old, she joins a group of young and talented liberals that Thorn and Montgomery have recruited to run for office in the next few years. That group includes Jackson Kennedy, Nicole Kershaw, and she is certainly just as talented and intellectual, but she hasn't drawn as much attention as she is focusing on her work as Insurance Commissioner. Phelps is quietly building up quite a nice little war chest for a competition two years from now, and is expected to announce her run sometime early next year.

In Florida, he may be trailing in the polls for the democratic nomination for Senate, but that doesn't change his immense popularity in the city of Miami. Umberto Guerro 34 years old, was reelected in 2008 with 71% of the vote. Despite his far-left social positions, his moderate economic stance has helped the him enjoy the high ratings he has. He has helped many impoverished with the opening of free-health clinics, and has gained their overall support in his disagreements with Governor Swenson over state-wide healthcare for poorer citizens. He is still in the hunt for the democratic nomination this year for the senate seat, but Congressman John Tandy seems to be the likely candidate. He may well set his sights on the Senate seat two years from now.

The last person to discuss in this article is State Attorney General of New Jersey, Todd Hayes. Hayes, at only 31 years of age, is the youngest AG in New Jersey history. And he has already laid the groundwork for a possible organization to help him run in two years time. Educated at Stanford University and Harvord University for undergrad and grad school, he is incredibly intelligent, and has drawn comparison to Andrew Thorn in his demeanor. His ability to speak about liberalism, while being respectful in regards to centerism and conservatism. He has rallied for President Santos, while also being very critical of the, Governor John Treyman, who is part of the so-called moderate "Santos Wing" of the democratic party. We will soon see what he is planning, as he runs for reelection this year as AG.
 
Last edited:
I always enjoyed Time Magazine's Person of the Year issue. Even if it is (both universes) American-centric...

Man of the Year.png

Everything's pretty normal through 1989, except D. Wire Newman gets Man of the Year due to the special presidential election in 1986.

Lassiter gets it twice, first for winning the 1990 election and then for his role in ending the Gulf War and "modernizing the Conservative movement."

Ayatollah Afkham made a lot of headlines in '92 when there was some tense headlines between the US and Iran.

'93 celebrated the end of Apartheid (like in real-life, sans the also-celebrated Middle East treaty under Clinton).

Bernard Dahl's reform of the Federal Reserve was celebrated in 1994.

Pope Victor IV's historic election as the first modern African pope made him headlines in 1995.

House Minority Leader Jim Hohner's Republican takeover of Congress in the '96 elections got him the top spot.

Prime Minister Ben Yahbin's modest efforts to solve Middle East peace helped him in '97.

Dark Horse candidate Josiah Bartlet's surprise triumph in the '98 election was noteworthy-enough.

Indian Prime Minister Nohamid's successful talks with Pakistan in '99 brought her to prominence.

John Hoynes made surprise headlines when Times declared him future Man of the Year in the year 2000 (how'd that work out?).

Movie Producer Roger Becker, noted philanthropist, was honored by Time in 2001.

In 2002, instead of honoring President Bartlet on his re-election (and perhaps tarnished by the MS scandal), Time honored newly elected Russian President Pyotr Chigorin, a moderate reformer.

However, Bartlet was once again crowned in '03 after a tough year due to the Zoey Bartlet crisis, the resignation of Hoynes, a government shutdown (that he was the hero of), and several other events.

In 2004, the unprecedented events in the UK general election led unseen Conservative leader Maureen Graty to become Person of the Year.

The Middle East Peace Treaty of 2005, still fresh on everyone's minds, brought Bartlet, along with Israel Prime Minister Zahavy and Palestine President Farad, to prominence.

In 2006, due to the close election, Time chose to honor both President-elect Matt Santos, and runner-up (and winner of the popular vote) Arnold Vinick.

The Qumari Republican Revolution was a top news event of 2007, and the mastermind, Zuben Ahmed, was the most newsworthy of figures in that situation.

Controversially, the economy was thought to be improving in late 2008, and Treasury Secretary Christopher Parker was made Person of the Year for this triumph. This may not have been the right choice in hindsight.

The first abstract category since 1975, "The American Soldier" was made Person of the Year to bring light to the Kazakhstan and Gaza Wars.

Man of the Year.png
 
Ever%2BCarradine.jpg


Ever Carradine as state Insurance Commissioner of Michigan, Kelly Phelps


andrew-garfield.jpg


Andrew Garfield as New Jersey Attorney General, Todd Hayes
 
Last edited:
New York Times Sunday Book Review

'Crisis Point'

By ALAN MONTECILLO
Published: July 18, 2010

These days, American politics is so heavily diluted by partisan bickering that pure ideological candidates find their views reduced to sound bites and their issues of choice pushed to the back of the average American's cranium. Understandably, but unfortunately, the annual crop of political literature follows that same tract of thought. Jasper Irving's 'Crisis Point' provides a breath of a fresh air for those of us used to the generic spiel.

'Crisis Point' is less of a autobiography than a revised manifesto of conservative ideals, ideals that reach across all facets of contemporary American politics, maintaining an intellectualism lost upon many politicians, yet a tone that all readers can understand:

"In the great course of events that have come to define recent history, it seems only one thing can be assured: the coming of changes. In fact, our world has likely changed more in the past ten years than in the previous hundred. As Americans, we'll have to deal with realities unimaginable, both in positive and negative ways. Just how we deal with that change is of paramount importance."

And Irving avoids the fatal flaw of numerous political novels, which is, in regards to the positions of others, possessing so antagonistic of an opinion that moderate Americans can barely stomach the novel. Case example: "The Rebirth of American Conservatism" by Pittsburgh Mayor Jackson Kennedy. Although the aforementioned writings appealed greatly to left-leaning Americans, it was panned by moderate and conservative critics. Fortunately for Irving (as well as the American reader), his novel does not venture down that path. Irving maintains an respectful tone when speaking of the opposition in this novel, and focuses upon the issues rather than making personal attacks on any particular groups or individuals.

The biggest strength of "Crisis Point" is in the prose of Irving. This might come as a bit of a surprise to much of the literary community, as this is the first novel written by Irving, but he certainly will make a name for himself off of 'Crisis Point.' Irving, while at his alma mater Georgetown University, became a local legend for his writings in the campus newspaper, The Hoya and gained acclaim from local professionals, something unheard of in previous years. Irving later gained a staff position with Washington Post off of his college success. However, his journalistic career did not last, and further examples of Irving's writings are not available. Irving writes each section of the novel with proper care and dedication, leaving no issue weakened in comparison to others. His prowess is shown in passages like this:

"It is with much caution that Americans cast our view to the situation overseas. Obviously, a region so foreign and so differentiated from our own merits individual cultural rights and societal liberties, and our nation must allow that. Our nation must avoid the problem of becoming an interventionist, of being too deadset in one goal that it is willing to achieve said goal no matter what it takes. That path has been shown time and time again to cause more harm than good, and is clearly not advisable. However, America as a nation has a responsibility to combat global issues, ranging from terrorism to environmental protection, and that duty is undeniable."

This introduction to foreign affairs sets the perfect undertones for a civilized discussion on the issues, a conversation lost upon many of today's candidates. Divided into two main sections, foreign and domestic relations, 'Crisis Point' manages to touch upon the entire spectrum of American politics. Immigration, campaign finance reform, the wars in Gaza and Kazakhstan and even tort reform earns a place in Irving's first publication. Irving goes into much detail, providing example upon example of reasoning and logic, condensing the conservative platform, or at least Irving's conservative platform, into a 234 page novel. Much like Thomas Paine's 'Common Sense' or Barry Goldwater's 'The Conscience of a Conservative,' 'Crisis Point' has the potential to transform a generation of not only Republicans, but Americans.

And in that, 'Crisis Point' has its power.

Alan Montecillo is the author of "Courage: Men Under Fire," seven other political novels and a former consultant to Secretary of State Arnold Vinick.
 
Last edited:
Newredstate.png


Jasper Irving's Book to Be Released Today

By Riley Cage
July 18, 2010
5:57 AM EST

It's not very often that a Conservative Republican releases a novel starting with an exclusive book review in The New York Times, but Congressman Jasper Irving has certainly turned heads with 'Crisis Point,' his first publication.

Irving has not announced plans for a book tour, as he believes his duty "currently lies with the United States House of Representatives." Here at RedState we certainly admire his candor, and anxiously await getting our hands on his book later this morning.

New York Times book reviewer Alan Montecillo was "one of five" outsiders given a copy of 'Crisis Point,' as any other copies were strictly ordered to be unveiled at 8 AM EST with the opening of the first book stores across the Eastern Seaboard.

Our own review will soon follow.
 
todayshow-logo.gif


tom_cruise_msnbc_today_show_1.jpg


The following is a transcript of July 18, 2010's Today Show

LAUER: One of today's biggest stories is the release of a new book by Illinois Congressman Jasper Irving. I'm here in Washington DC with Congressman Irving. Congressman, hello.

IRVING: Goodmorning, Matt! I have to say that it's quite a pleasure to be included in this program, I love what you all are doing with it. Oh - and call me Jasper.

LAUER: Thank you for your kind words, and thanks for joining us today. Now, let's get to the heart of the matter here, your book, 'Crisis Point' is being released, with quite some hype.

IRVING: Ah, well, I'm flattered by all the hooplah around this novel, and I'm glad that Americans are interested in a mature discussion on the issues.

LAUER: Not to mention the limited pre-release availability of your book.

IRVING: (laughs) Well, I like to build drama.

LAUER: Clearly, but it paid off. Early reports have seen stores swamped with people demanding 'Crisis Point.' And your first review, in the New York Times, was quite positive.

IRVING: Like I said, I think that Americans just want to be talked to straight. They don't want the slander or the spin that, unfortunately, many politicians practice.

LAUER: Anyone in particular?

IRVING: Now, come on, we're not here to play that game.

LAUER: (Laughs) Pardon me then. Now, back to the book. Tell me about what motivated you to write it.

IRVING: Well, before I entered in politics in the 2006 election, I had been working in the insurance industry. Just like many of your viewers right now, I had to sit through election years where all these candidates would speak in half-truths or try to avoid the topics at hand. I never liked that. And when I ran for Congress and became a part of this system, I only saw a worse case of that. In fact, I was sickened with the degree to which some of these races deviated from what they're supposed to be about: solutions to problems, management, those kinds of things. So, I stumped in my district about that, I spoke to schools, unions, companies, etc., and it was out of those speeches that I was able to lay the foundation for 'Crisis Point.'

LAUER: But why now? Why a book? Is this an attempt to launch yourself into a larger arena.

IRVING: Heavens no, I'm just a freshman Congressman afterall. Trust me, the limelight is not where I want to be right now, I'll leave that for some of the other guys. This is just a cumulation of my frustration, and I felt that if I could fuel that into some positive outcome, that would be all the better. So I bided my time with 'Crisis Point' and really built a solid case.

LAUER: A case for what?

IRVING: A case for what politics should be. What ideas and plans we should implement to create a better future for ourselves and our children.

LAUER: Go on about these ideas and plans.

IRVING: Well, I think one of my favorite aspects of this novel was the chapter about domestic apathy. It strikes me as depressing how Americans can seem so out of the loop when it comes to their own nation. Our gated communities, full of Mercedes' strike a contrast to some places where electricity can barely be maintained. While American patriotism is at an all time high, we can't seem to fix all the problems with our own nation. And on top of that, we're overseas, in Kazakhstan and Gaza, trying to do what we should be doing at home, creating a peaceful civilization for all. That balance is something that we definitely need to focus upon in the future.

LAUER: Speaking of the future, where do you see yourself ten, twenty years down the road?

IRVING: (laughs) Another, 'are you trying to carve a path to the White House' question eh? Well, I'm sorry, but I'm simply not a career politician. I ran for Congress because I felt that there were issues that weren't being addressed, and when I feel that those problems are corrected, I'll return to private life. So, in twenty years, I'll hopefully be retired, with my wife and children by my side.

LAUER: So you're not in politics to win it all then?

IRVING: No, I believe in the more traditional definition of American political service. Did you know that in the early years of our Republic, our politicians were nowhere near the careerists that we have today, in fact, most politicians ran for more than one or two terms.

LAUER: Interesting, although I understand that you've announced you're candidacy for a second term.

IRVING: That's correct Matt, and I certainly hope that I can serve the people of my district for two more wonderful years as their Representative.

LAUER: Well, I think that we're all out of time today Congressman. Thank you for coming on the Today Show.

IRVING: It's been a pleasure. Anytime.
 
Last edited:
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top