So, no development of a hydrogen-oxygen upper stage, just straight to nuclear fission powered ion rockets? And switching from hypergolics to ker-lox heavy launchers?
Nope, there is R&D on hydrogen-oxygen engine for UR-1000, only that program is delay into R&D in 1980 and first operation in 1990s.
seems that first secretary of Kaszakh had some issues with Toxic Fallout from UR-700
Given that Soviets don't do solids, it's good to focus on kerosene for the first stages anyway; if not trying for hydrogen engines for the upper stages frees up funding for making practical nuclear-powered ion drives work, then that might work out I guess.
Not sure that nuclear plants can be made light and efficient enough to be preferable over solar-powered systems for propelling ion rockets, at least not for the inner system--out around Jupiter and beyond the nukes attainable in the 1970s would be better I guess.
It has become more obvious in the past few posts how the timeline might be leading to the sort of tech seen in Kubrick and Clarke's movie. Numbering the Western space stations so that we are on "5" in 2000; a Shuttle program leading to the spaceplane Heywood Floyd takes up to said station. And here we see nuclear power in space mentioned I believe for the first time, anyway for driving some sort of rocket engine.
Fission plants generating electricity to drive an ion rocket are still a pretty far cry from Discovery's engines--I never read the World of 2001 so only online descriptions of unknown reliability tell me that Clarke says those engines are advanced fission engines that heat up a plasma which presumably has ISP in the ballpark of a good ion drive--sort of a mix of very hot thermal nuke engines plus electromagnetic super-thrusting on the resulting plasma I guess. Nor do we know the reactant--I suppose hydrogen, and I think Clarke wanted there to be big fuel tanks attached to Discovery's spine--presumably three sets, one for Jupiter rendezvous, two more to leave Jupiter and then brake into Earth orbit again, the missing fourth one (probably half the length of the long spine separating the engines from the life/mission sphere, for reasons that should be obvious now) used up and dropped in boosting to a Jovian encounter trajectory. Kubrick said no though (don't know if for budget reasons or just because he thought they'd spoil the look of the spacecraft) so just from the screen canon we'd have to guess at an even more efficient engine system--I always assumed they had to be some kind of fusion engines.
Solid only for ICBM, for some reason the Soviet/Russians hate solid for Satellite and manned launcher.
The Soviet and Russian have long tradition for envision a Nuclear electric engine for space, as Space tug or Engine block for interplanetary Mission.
The problem is here not mass, but efficiency of solar cells vs energy need of Ion engine. here a nuclear reactor can do wonders.
While the USA goes another nuclear way (Spoilers)
The Discovery one spine contain ammonia fuel modules for Jupiter rendezvous and get in target orbit until Discovery Two arrives and get One's crew out of Hibernation (Novel 2001 and 2010)
Kubrik had various issue with Discovery, the first version with three big fuel tanks attached was Orion nuclear Drive using exploding Atomic bombs to catapult it to Jupiter, what Kubrick not wanted because Dr Srangelove Nuke theme
second version "Dragonfly" used large Wing like Radiator, what Kubrick disliked "to much airplane" so in end became tha Discovery from movie
It's drive Cavradyne Engine were envision by Thomas F. Widner head of Nuclear Engine division of General Electric working as consultant for Kubrick team.
it a Gas core nuclear engine, that's nuclear fuel is in form of a hot Gas at 20000 °Kelvin ! what accelerated the ammonia to a hell of speed
Anyway Soviet capability of matching and surpassing these engines has to wait until the construction of Leonov, in the mid-2000s, some thirty years after these mid-70s directives. The book called it the "Sakharov Drive" which suggests that scientist-engineer is better reconciled to the regime than he was OTL by this time. Well, you got rid of Brezhnev and you didn't put in someone like Shelepin in his place, so that might help. Plus reconciliation with China, and bettering relations with the West, and of course survival of the USSR until 2010, all suggest he might have been more pleased with the way things were going in the Soviet Union and therefore had one last genius idea in him, presumably yet another form of plasma-fusion engine.
All of that awaits breakthroughs as yet undreamed of (well, dreamed of, but hardly something one can plan on in 1976) so of course they go ahead with tech that is known to be workable, at least theoretically.
The Term "Sakharov Drive" implies in novel of 2010, that Soviets manage to control Muon-catalyzed fusion, discover by Sakharov in 1950
Main problem with concept is that the muon particle has very very very short life of 0.0000021 second, to short to be used for fusion application.
i try to stay realistic in term of technology, but since 64 years there no progress in Muon-catalyzed fusion.
If the Soviets can hope to make practical ion engines (practical for manned spaceships I mean, thrusting at high enough thrusts to use the high ISP to achieve big delta-Vs in days instead of years--when people say solar is as good as nuclear they probably only refer to the latter sorts of low thrusts we can achieve today OTL) by the 1980s I guess they are going ahead with Moonbase plans of their own; they probably also are designing highly advanced fission plants for power generation on the ground (and God knows what uses for weapons-grade material production--but no WWIII until 2010 at the earliest, right?)
Nice to see Kosygin refused to let the USSR get thrown into the astronautical briar patch of imitating the American shuttle down to the last bolt as happened OTL with Buran. Presumably Soviet launchers of the 1980s will remain rockets, albeit with recoverable first stages, and any spaceplane like systems will be satellites launched on rockets external to them, that might return as glider capsules, or they might stick with old-fashioned capsules but of more advanced design--successors to TKS I guess since that system will already be on line in the Seventies.
To much spoiler...