Eurofed
Banned
And the quote given by him is from a low rank diplomatic official-certainly of lower status then Goebbels.
Who is saying the same thing as Goebbels. Jewish Madagascar shall be a German protectorate.
And the quote given by him is from a low rank diplomatic official-certainly of lower status then Goebbels.
The estimated potential for habitation was estimated by Polish experts at 40.000, that's far off cry from "millions"For as many large numbers of Jews would die off in the deportation, surely millions more would survive this way than in the Holocaust.
So if Red Army didn't liberate Auschwitz, the Nazis would set Jews free ?The much vaunted OTL Allied liberation of Europe allowed the Nazis to kill the European Jews pretty much almost entirely
Well the Jewis experts estimated 1-2.000 Jews could be settled. And Palestine was not a disease infested island thousands of miles away from shipping an food transports. Neither was it under the rule of genocidal regime that saw Jews as subhumans to exterminate.Moreover, I'm pretty sure that Polish predictions would turn out unaccurate in the end. Pre-Zionist Palestine, too, was largely deemed unsuitable for large-scale settlement of European Jews.
And I am sure those supplies and money wouldn't end up for German war effort and families of Nazi party elite.American Jews would almost surely send supplies and money in their brethren in Madagascar.
Making a list before the war of prominent Jewish rabbis, doctors, lawyers, and merchants to murder, whose names were listed in the Sonderfahndungsbuch Polen, and selected by Gestapo office in Berlin by orders of Heydrich seems hardly as "unsystematic" and in fact quite like a bureucratic effort effort to track them down and kill them.
Which Enisatzgruppe zur besondern verwendung did-well at least according to Alexander B. Rossino from Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies.
Listing names, creating a special book with the names to track down the people and murder them, establishing a unit to do that. Seems like everything but unsystematic effort. And it seems like quite a lot of bureucratic work was put into the effort to make sure those people were murdered.
So if Red Army didn't liberate Auschwitz, the Nazis would set Jews free ?![]()
Well the Jewis experts estimated 1-2.000 Jews could be settled.
And Palestine was not a disease infested island thousands of miles away from shipping an food transports.
And I am sure those supplies and money wouldn't end up for German war effort and families of Nazi party elite.
Some of Auschwitz survivors live today, perhaps you would like to tell them that to their face ?For the good that it made. By the time the Red Army reached Auschwitz, the Holocaust had almost entirely run its course.
Doesn't really matter. Organised genocide can be inflicted on thousands not not on millions. The point is that the theory of supposed "deportation first" Nazi policy is incorrect looking at historicall behaviour. They murdered Jews in organised actions from the start of WW2.You really don't want to see the point, do you ? It's all about scale. By themselves, the Enisatzgruppen alone would be able to kill thousands, or tens of thousands, not millions.
So colonists with much better support would have less chances of survival then mistreated Jews fighting for survival-your argument doesn't sound logical.As affluent settlers. Not deportees struggling for survival and figthing for survival.
Close to Europe, shipping and with ample of support base developed by Zionist colonists for decades. Even then they never amounted to millions like you propose settled in Madagascar.It was a semi-desertic wasteland.
Arms build up, resistance in Soviet Union, and of course this doesn't contradict the ability for Nazi elites to steal money and goods for personal use and to provide support among German population-something they were quite known for in OTL.Which war effort ? In this scenario, America and the Axis are at peace. Maybe in a Cold War, but at peace.