Background on 1 January 1918 [to the German Spring Offensive]:
In 1918, Imperial Germany was suffering from the effects of war, but the army had one last opportunity of gaining a decisive victory that couldn't be squandered. General Erich Ludendorff of the Supreme Army Command was planning for the offensive even as early as 1 November 1917 [due to butterflies], although his plans would be later criticized as the only objective was to defeat British and French Armies after piercing holes at strategic points and lead the German soldiers to exploit the gaps. After all, despite his knowledge that that Germany might lose a war of attrition, he was reluctant to sacrifice German territorial gains on the Western and Eastern Fronts and this became a serious obstacle to German government negotiations for a peace settlement with the Entente.
Although the British Expeditionary Force's [less successful than reality] continuous offensives at the Somme, Arras, Passchendaele and Cambrai inflicted substantial casualties on the Germans, the troops were exhausted. Now, Russia had surrendered after the [earlier] October Bolshevik Revolution and turmoil was rampant there. Italy suffered a defeat at Caporetto and was incapable of recovering [effectively]. France had lost too many troops that most of the reserves in 1918 were too inexperienced, elderly, distant, unfit or young [for several] to fight, although defending trenches and better welfare might solve the issue. American help wasn't forthcoming and only several goods and loans could be transferred at most.
When the Spring Offensive began, Germany had approximately 200 divisions in the west, including isolated units [due to reduced casualties and less troops in the Ukraine]. 85 divisions faced the shorter British front [including reserves], which was slightly extended when the British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, discussed with the French at the Boulogne Conference. The "defence line" sectors that were swapped with British troops weren't prepared and heavy work was needed to make them useable. Throughout the winter of 1917–1918, the new British line was constructed in an arc of ruined villages around St Quentin with the help of small logistical and new units. As a result, there were isolated outposts, unoccupied gaps, regions of disputed territory and shell and mud induced waste land around the line. A new three-zone system of defence in depth was built to improve the line, but infantry working-parties did most of the work at a critical time. By March 1918, the redoubts in the battle zone were complete, but defences at the rear zone weren't adequately completed.
[The point of divergence is a better German loss ratio at Jutland with massive losses for the British, despite the heavy German casualties. Consider it as a significant German benefitting pyrrhic victory. Then, worse British and Russian performance for the rest of 1916 and 1917 keep Romania neutral, increase French casualties and reduce unrestricted submarine warfare that American intervention and Zimmermann are butterflied. A worse performance of Russia in 1917 results in German exploitation of the Russian defeat and leads to Estonia being entered, along with the Bolshevik Revolution set forward by several weeks due to a lack of troops defending Petrograd after being sent to the frontline.]
So far, here're the effective Entente powers [other actual Entente powers are too insignificant, too far away, colonies or had their intervention butterflied as a result of the Jutland pod].
Serbia, Russia [left in November 1917], France, Belgium, Britain and its empire, Montenegro [militarily ineffective since 1916], Italy [, San Marino] and Portugal. Greece might be probable.
[Despite Japanese potential, Japanese participation in Europe was navy focused. San Marino was too small. American and Romanian interventions are butterflied by the Jutland p.o.d. and so with Latin American states. China was in chaos and severed relations only in this scenario. Siamese military contribution, while helpful, was minimal.]
[Note that Japan in this scenario would be involved in naval matters and intervention in Russia and colonial affairs.]
In 1918, Imperial Germany was suffering from the effects of war, but the army had one last opportunity of gaining a decisive victory that couldn't be squandered. General Erich Ludendorff of the Supreme Army Command was planning for the offensive even as early as 1 November 1917 [due to butterflies], although his plans would be later criticized as the only objective was to defeat British and French Armies after piercing holes at strategic points and lead the German soldiers to exploit the gaps. After all, despite his knowledge that that Germany might lose a war of attrition, he was reluctant to sacrifice German territorial gains on the Western and Eastern Fronts and this became a serious obstacle to German government negotiations for a peace settlement with the Entente.
Although the British Expeditionary Force's [less successful than reality] continuous offensives at the Somme, Arras, Passchendaele and Cambrai inflicted substantial casualties on the Germans, the troops were exhausted. Now, Russia had surrendered after the [earlier] October Bolshevik Revolution and turmoil was rampant there. Italy suffered a defeat at Caporetto and was incapable of recovering [effectively]. France had lost too many troops that most of the reserves in 1918 were too inexperienced, elderly, distant, unfit or young [for several] to fight, although defending trenches and better welfare might solve the issue. American help wasn't forthcoming and only several goods and loans could be transferred at most.
When the Spring Offensive began, Germany had approximately 200 divisions in the west, including isolated units [due to reduced casualties and less troops in the Ukraine]. 85 divisions faced the shorter British front [including reserves], which was slightly extended when the British Prime Minister, Lloyd George, discussed with the French at the Boulogne Conference. The "defence line" sectors that were swapped with British troops weren't prepared and heavy work was needed to make them useable. Throughout the winter of 1917–1918, the new British line was constructed in an arc of ruined villages around St Quentin with the help of small logistical and new units. As a result, there were isolated outposts, unoccupied gaps, regions of disputed territory and shell and mud induced waste land around the line. A new three-zone system of defence in depth was built to improve the line, but infantry working-parties did most of the work at a critical time. By March 1918, the redoubts in the battle zone were complete, but defences at the rear zone weren't adequately completed.
[The point of divergence is a better German loss ratio at Jutland with massive losses for the British, despite the heavy German casualties. Consider it as a significant German benefitting pyrrhic victory. Then, worse British and Russian performance for the rest of 1916 and 1917 keep Romania neutral, increase French casualties and reduce unrestricted submarine warfare that American intervention and Zimmermann are butterflied. A worse performance of Russia in 1917 results in German exploitation of the Russian defeat and leads to Estonia being entered, along with the Bolshevik Revolution set forward by several weeks due to a lack of troops defending Petrograd after being sent to the frontline.]
So far, here're the effective Entente powers [other actual Entente powers are too insignificant, too far away, colonies or had their intervention
Serbia, Russia [left in November 1917], France, Belgium, Britain and its empire, Montenegro [militarily ineffective since 1916], Italy [, San Marino] and Portugal. Greece might be probable.
[Despite Japanese potential, Japanese participation in Europe was navy focused. San Marino was too small. American and Romanian interventions are butterflied by the Jutland p.o.d. and so with Latin American states. China was in chaos and severed relations only in this scenario. Siamese military contribution, while helpful, was minimal.]
[Note that Japan in this scenario would be involved in naval matters and intervention in Russia and colonial affairs.]
Last edited: