Red Star: A Soviet Lunar Landing

While 1971 saw little to no visible activity from the Soviet Union’s Lunar Efforts, in the US, NASA was pressing on with their own Apollo Missions which were now entering the next stage.
images

The May of that year saw Apollo 15 begin the first J-Class Apollo Moon Mission, with the Lunar Surface stay time now extended to three days with the beefed-up LEM that could support the crew for the required time. Other notable differences between the J-Class and H-Class missions lay in that they ‘J’ missions would carry the Lunar Rover with them, permitting a greater travel capability for the crew on the Lunar Surface - although still required to be within “walk-back” distance of the LEM in case the Rover failed. Another significant difference lay in that the Geology Training that the astronauts received had been substantially revised, now being a high priority to maximise the science return value of each mission.
images

As a result, in the months leading up to Apollo 15, Dave Scott (Cmdr) and James Irwin (LMP), along with their backup crew, had undertaken field geology training at select geological sites in Arizona and New Mexico, becoming more realistic - with the addition of backpack mock-ups and communication via walkie-talkies to a CAPCOM nearby - as the launch date approached. While the CMP, Alfred Worden and his backup received a different training, learning to make and communicate their observations from a plane flying over terrain in a manner similar to how he’d see it from the CSM while it remained in Lunar Orbit.

Following their landing in the Hadley Rille, unlike the previous Lunar landings when the crew exited their LEM shortly after landing, the Apollo 15 crew had elected to remain in the LEM until the next day, the long duration of their EVAs (up to 7 hours) requiring that they be at their best. Although Dave Scott had become aware of the need to get an overview of the survey site prior to venturing outside. As a result, he successfully convinced the NASA management to allow a short “stand-up” EVA that would allow the people on the ground to get a general idea of what the site was really like to cut the chances of unexpected (nasty) surprises. For about 30 minutes, he described the area from his vantage point at the LEM docking hatch (with him standing on the Ascent Stage Engine Cover) before heading back inside the LEM and closing the hatch again. This had also aided to allay concerns about the use of the Rover, since prior observations had suggested that the area was covered in large boulders that would make traversing them impossible with it, Scott was able to see that there was nothing larger than 6-8 inches nearby, which would make using the Rover quite safe.
images

During the first sleep period, the most serious problem occurred, as the O2 supply dropped steadily, but faster than normal, indicating a leak from somewhere. With the LEM running in a low-power mode while the crew slept, they could not tell the precise cause until the crew was awoken an hour early and the high rate data telemetry stream was turned back on that they were able to trace the fault to a valve in the Urine Transfer Device was still open despite the receptacle being capped. Thankfully, less than 10% of the O2 supply was lost, with 50% of the O2 being reserve allowing the mission to continue as normal.
images

After collecting a contingency sample of lunar rock from around the LEM, the next step was to deploy the Lunar Rover, which had been stored on the side of the LEM descent stage, following which a test drive around the LEM was conducted by Scott, and other than the steering (which only worked on the back wheels instead of both the front and back wheels) and difficulty bending in their suits, it worked well.
220px-Apollo_15_flag%2C_rover%2C_LM%2C_Irwin.jpg

In order to make certain that they could get the most possible from their EVA, they first travelled to the most distant point of the traverse, and work their way back to the LEM, heading to the “Elbow” crater, which would also allow them to work out the precise location of where they landed, thanks to the Rover‘s navigation system that worked out the distance and direction of a known starting point.

The other location for the first EVA was the St George crater, and then a return to the LEM to set up the ALSEP consisting of a passive seismic experiment, lunar dust measurements and heat flow gauges drilled into the ground to name a few, taking the first EVA duration to 6.5 hours, and leaving Irwin dehydrated since his water bags in his suit hadn’t worked, and he went for over 7 hours without liquids.

The next two EVAs saw them travel to other distinct locations around the Hadley Rille, including the Dune crater at the South Cluster, the Spur crater, and Scarp crater. Amongst their tasks were to take a Deep Core Sample, though this proved to be a particular challenge, since the drill became stuck as they tried to pull it out, and they had to wait until their third EVA before they could finally obtain it.
images

But perhaps the most important find came during their second EVA, when they found a particular sample that was almost pure plagioclase, anorthosite, he new geology training they‘d received paid off as they found one of the oldest samples of lunar material, later found to date from the Lunar Pre-Imbrian Era - although they had initially believed that it came from the primordial crust of the Moon.

The mission, while achieving all of its key objectives, was overshadowed somewhat, by the revelation that the crew had carried with them (and without authorisation) postage stamps that they had intended to sell upon their return. The negative publicity ensured that it would be their last spaceflight.
220px-Apollo_16_crew.jpg

The following November would see John Young (Cmdr), Ken Mattingly (CMP), and Charles Duke (LMP) taken to the Descartes Highlands, where it was believed that the Descartes and Cayley formations in the area had been formed by magma more viscous than at the lunar maria, and likely by lunar volcanism.
apollo_16_cm.gif

Despite issues with the CSM (chiefly with the backup control system for its steerable engine) that caused a significant delay in their landing (thereby requiring modification of their EVA activities to compensate), they were able to landing within 200 metres of their targeted landing site. Once they’d completed their first rest period on the Moon, they exited their LEM Cabin for their first Lunar EVA, beginning the preparatory work before they would begin their surface operations proper. Again, the Rover was deployed with ease, but unlike the Apollo 15 rover, this time it was the rear wheels that didn’t work for a time - although needing only one set of wheels to turn meant they could still use it. Spending just over 7 hours outside the LEM, they first planted the Flag of the USA, then set up the experiments package that would continue to operate after the crew had left, before travelling on the rover to Plum crater, at the edge of Flag crater for their first geologic stop. After which they went to Buster crater, where the largest single rock sample of the Apollo missions to that point (by mass) was collected, and a magnetic field experiment was set up.
images

The following two EVAs, over the next two days, they visited a number of sites of interest including, the Cinco craters, where at 152 metres above the LEM, was the highest elevation above a LEM for the Apollo missions, along with a number of other points along the North and South Ray craters. One particular detail they determined during their EVAs was that the disproving of the pre-mission volcanic hypothesis, owing to the large number of micrometeorite impacts found on a particularly large boulder dubbed “House Rock”. “Shadow Rock” was another interesting item that allowed them to obtain samples of permanently shadowed lunar regolith. They were also able to set a speed record of 10.6 mph on the Moon during their third and final EVA.
images

Their mission didn’t end with the return to the CSM. Before leaving, they deployed a sub-satellite (which Apollo 15 had also done the previous year) that would continue to observe the Moon when they left, although since a burn to place the CSM into the desired Lunar Orbit for the satellite had been cancelled, it would only last for half its originally intended lifetime before crashing into the Lunar Surface. Indeed, the orbit of PFS-2 kept changing wildly in both shape and altitude throughout its short 35-day duration. And again, like Apollo 15 before it, on the Trans-Earth Return, a deep-space EVA was conducted to retrieve the film cassettes from the SM before it would be jettisoned.
images
 
images

After two years of absolutely no lunar landings and an entire year without any spaceflights at all the Soviets at TsKBEM were understandably eager to regain their footing as leaders in the Space Race. NASA had obviously taken the lead with these new "J-Class" missions and their announced intentions for the Skylab space station and LESA lunar base only fuelled a revival of American optimism in the Space Race. While their "LK shelter" was still under development Mishin had no choice but to simply fly conventional L3 missions to fill the gap. However in LEO, things were different. The Soviet approach of making a small, lightweight Space Station rather than the Americans 70+ tonne monster gave them a much needed boost after a year of complete inactivity.

This long dormancy was broken on October 19th 1972 with the launch of the Zarya-1 space station. The USSR was quick to provide a cover story for any possible failures that might occur and so at launch, the announced purpose of Salyut was merely to test the elements of the systems of a space station and to conduct scientific research experiments.
soyuz-10_salyut.jpg

With a mass of just 18,425 kg it could easily fit within the mass budget of the N11. It was smaller in size than the planned Skylab as well with a length of just 15.8 meters and a maximum diameter of just 4.15 meters. With two sets of solar panels and three pressurized compartments it could easily support a crew of cosmonauts for weeks on end.

After successfully deploying into a circular orbit (220 by 200 km) the spacecraft was quickly visited by it's first crew. Soyuz 8 was the first Soviet launched LEO mission in over four years and it was to be a milestone mission. launching just four days after Zarya-1 reached orbit the crew wasted no time and was able to rendezvous with the Station in just 24 hours (showing a high degree of precision to the new cosmonauts).
soyuz-10_launch.jpg

Aleksei Yeliseyev and Nikolai Rukavishnikov were eager to become the world's first space station crew after the Americans had taken the stage for themselves. Yeliseyev had previously flown on Soyuz 3 in the USSR's first ever rendezvous docking and crew exchange while Rukavishnikov had previously flown solo in Lunar orbit on the L3-2 mission.
Salyut1_with_docked_Soyuz_spacecraft.jpg

The mission was highly successful with the crew successfully achieving soft-docking one their very first attempt. After nearly three years of development and testing the station performed flawlessly and the duration goal was achieved. First space station flight, a full year before the American Skylab. Equipment aboard Zarya 1 included a telescope, spectrometer, electro photometer, and television. The crew checked improved on-board spacecraft systems in different conditions of flight and conducted medical-biological research. The main instrument, a small solar telescope was operated long before NASA's equivalent on Skylab was put into action. The desired duration had been a heated debate topic back on Earth. After much deliberation it had been decided that Soyuz 8 would attempt a 30 day duration mission followed by Soyuz 9 on a 45 day duration mission. In a single mission the perception of the USSR had changed drastically to once again being a formidable opponent in the Space Race.
qsl1inf2.jpg

Onboard Zarya-1

Soyuz 9 followed just 20 days after Soyuz 8 had left Zarya-1. The Zarya was not a mere single use and throw away station like the cancelled space laboratory designed by the USAF (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) but was instead designed to be serviced by at least two long duration expeditions. After the successful return of Soyuz 8 after a 30 day duration mission Soyuz 9 was on it's way to breaking the record the Soviet had already set themselves. One thing the USSR had a significant amount of experience with was long duration spaceflight. Ever since Vostok-1 the Soviets had maintained the record for the longest manned spaceflight. Soyuz 9 would help solidify this long lead.
images

Crew and Backup Crew during training.

Soyuz 9 was crewed by Commander Vladimir Shatalov and Flight Engineer Valeri Kubasov on another two person Soyuz flight. The mission was another stunning achievement for a new Soviet Space program just coming out of it's year long shell. The felt they were overworked at times, a problem that would also be encountered on the American Skylab and LESA missions years later. The crew focused primarily on life sciences and the bodies reaction to the effects of weightlessness. The first EVA from a space station was also performed as the crew investigated the condition of the station's exterior. On return the crew was significantly weakened and celebratory occasions were cancelled as a result. The medical examination was even more intensive as the crew attempted to recover as scientists now observed their re-adaptation to Earth gravity. While onboard Zarya-1 the crew had observed the launch of the next in the line-up of Soviet space missions for that year, L3-4, the USSR's return to the Moon!
images
images

Mishin was extremely anxious about the results of the first launch, he knew that even if worst came to worst and the vehicle exploded, it would be completely unmanned and wouldn't harm a single cosmonaut. Unfortunately the fate of his career wouldn't be so rosy. However his fears proved unfounded as two years of sweat, tears and hard work finally paid off that cold December day in Kazakhstan. The successful separation of the Block A stage saw the biggest sigh of relief that had been heard in years. Three days later and with the LK lander in Lunar Orbit it became official, the launch was a success. With confidence built up they proceeded for the launched of the crewed Soyuz. The rush was quite justified as the LK had a limited orbital storage life before it's Block D crasher stage propellant would boil away. L3-4's crew was composed of cosmonaut Boris Volynov as commander who had previously flown on Voskhod 3, and flight engineer Anatoli Voronov. For both, this was their first lunar flight. Now they were playing for real, now their were lives at stake.

However for the second time their worries were unwarranted as the N1 skyrocketed into the upper atmosphere before successful Block A separation signalled as music to mission controls ears. It had been 6 years and now, it seemed they finally had perfected the damn thing. While Volynov and Voronov brought the public along with a live television broadcast of their Soyuz spaceship in colour (a minor first for Soviet spaceflight) the engineers on the ground prepared for the all important LK-Soyuz docking. Once again all went perfectly. Despite this it was still decided to do a spacewalk into the LK as added prestige points for their home country. The landing was so precise that Volynov was ordered to back away slightly to prevent damage to the rendezvous target.
images
images
images

The surface stay was notable for being the first real showcase of the Lunakhod-2 rover which had begun treading the lunar surface on it's six small wheels just a month prior to the December 15th 1972 landing. After a ten hour spacewalk where over a dozen experiments were set up (including a seismic detector for the inevitable crash of the LK ascent stage) and a visitation with both the Lunakhod rover as well as the Luna 21 lander that got it there, Volynov was forced to leave his little home on the Moon behind.
attachment.php

[insert name] greeted him fondly upon rendezvous and after just one final EVA in lunar orbit the crew settled in for three days of both mapping and admiring the lunar surface from above. The beautiful spectacle of Earthrise marked the final wonder they could soak in before the Block D engines performed it's final duty of returning the crew safely to Earth. Their perfection streak was broken only by the malfunction of the waste disposal system on the way back (it's still not known to this day what caused it as the issue never reappeared on later flights as described). Despite the mess the duo returned to the USSR heroes, proving that the Soviet Union was not about to back down from the Moon they had worked so tirelessly to win. No matter how advanced the US was every Astronaut would follow in the footsteps of Leonov, because he was the First.
 
Last edited:
No matter how advanced the US was every Astronaut would follow in the footsteps of Leonov, because he was the First.

True that! The only way the USA can get ahead, prestige-wise, is if they land on Mars first.

Smart move, having the Soviets get their first. The way American patriotism and politics work, it kind of ensures that the space race will go on and on an on. Having lost the race, we don't want to look like we've lost the game overall.

Will all this funding which is going towards the moon landings effect the voyager program?
 
Great update and enjoyed reading.

First some questions in regards to the Soviet Space Station. Historically this was Salyut-1 but it looks like you have changed the name to Zarya-1. The first Soviet space station the first crew Soyuz 10 couldn't get latched to the docking port. I assumed that with the Soviet Experience with docking from their Moon program they didn't have this same issue. I also see it looks like you have butterflied away the Soyuz 11 flight issues with depressurization and killing the crew? The flight numbers are a little different, in OTL Soyuz-11 was the first crew to successfully dock and enter Salyut 1 the world's first space station.

So if I read this correctly the Volynov did a 10-hour Lunar EVA?

Anyway I was doing some calculations on Lunar Duration times etc.

With some estimates on Apollo 13 it looks like the USA has spend a little over 132+ man hours of Lunar EVA time and brought back 681 lbs of lunar material.

The other thing I am seeing with me kind of reading behind the lines. It looks like the Soviets might try to jump ahead with the LM Shelter. The Americans and NASA might be smart to hedge their bets. The LESA Shelter is a significant jump over the standard LM with the two really not having much in common. However the LM Shelter and LM Taxi are basically basically evolutionary advancements on the standard LM hardware. It might be smart, especially considering they are basically neck and neck with the Soviets. Instead of trying to jump to the LESA Shelter which was something like 45-50 tons which is a really big jump from the 15 ton LM. Do some dual launch missions with the LM Shelter and a LM Taxi. This should allow 14 day missions and would be quicker to get developed than the LESA Shelter. The technology of un-manned landings on the lunar surface will need to be developed anyway to support any possible lunar bases.
 
Great update and enjoyed reading.

First some questions in regards to the Soviet Space Station. Historically this was Salyut-1 but it looks like you have changed the name to Zarya-1. The first Soviet space station the first crew Soyuz 10 couldn't get latched to the docking port. I assumed that with the Soviet Experience with docking from their Moon program they didn't have this same issue. I also see it looks like you have butterflied away the Soyuz 11 flight issues with depressurization and killing the crew? The flight numbers are a little different, in OTL Soyuz-11 was the first crew to successfully dock and enter Salyut 1 the world's first space station.

ITTL, the L3-1 and L3-2 missions suffered depressurisation of the RM following OM jettison, the 2-man crew being saved by their pressure suits. So they've modified the Soyuz RM here, and made the use of pressure suits mandatory, hence two per Soyuz sooner than IOTL. Thereby keeping OTL's Soyuz 11 from happening.


The other thing I am seeing with me kind of reading behind the lines. It looks like the Soviets might try to jump ahead with the LM Shelter. The Americans and NASA might be smart to hedge their bets. The LESA Shelter is a significant jump over the standard LM with the two really not having much in common. However the LM Shelter and LM Taxi are basically basically evolutionary advancements on the standard LM hardware. It might be smart, especially considering they are basically neck and neck with the Soviets. Instead of trying to jump to the LESA Shelter which was something like 45-50 tons which is a really big jump from the 15 ton LM. Do some dual launch missions with the LM Shelter and a LM Taxi. This should allow 14 day missions and would be quicker to get developed than the LESA Shelter. The technology of un-manned landings on the lunar surface will need to be developed anyway to support any possible lunar bases.

Long story short, NASA is trying to leapfrog the USSR by going straight to LESA, concluding that they won't get a lead unless they do. It's a big, but calculated risk.
 
Long story short, NASA is trying to leapfrog the USSR by going straight to LESA, concluding that they won't get a lead unless they do. It's a big, but calculated risk.
And not a bad one, I'd think. The TLI payload of the N1 in the 75-ton LEO payload variant is only about 16 ton, which translates to only about 6.6 tons of dry mass to the surface, of which some is the spacecraft. So if the Soviets go to a three-launch approach, with one launch pre-positioning this "LK Shelter" on the surface, a second placing a crew taxi LK into lunar orbit, and a third sending the crew on their way, they'd still only be able to match the basic American Apollo performance--two crew for a few days.

I'd argue that even at this point, the US is clearly leading in terms of lunar exploration, and LESA is more about cementing that lead than "catching up."
 
And not a bad one, I'd think. The TLI payload of the N1 in the 75-ton LEO payload variant is only about 16 ton, which translates to only about 6.6 tons of dry mass to the surface, of which some is the spacecraft. So if the Soviets go to a three-launch approach, with one launch pre-positioning this "LK Shelter" on the surface, a second placing a crew taxi LK into lunar orbit, and a third sending the crew on their way, they'd still only be able to match the basic American Apollo performance--two crew for a few days.

I'd argue that even at this point, the US is clearly leading in terms of lunar exploration, and LESA is more about cementing that lead than "catching up."

The fly in the ointment or bolt in the rocket chamber. I could see the soviets doing something like this. Landing a "LK Shelter on the surface" that allows one person to survive for say 5 days and the proclaim that they have setup the first lunar base.
 
Long story short, NASA is trying to leapfrog the USSR by going straight to LESA, concluding that they won't get a lead unless they do. It's a big, but calculated risk.

Interesting because that same calculated risk strategy allowed the USSR to beat the US to the first manned lunar landing. Is NASA going to get burned twice? Only time will tell......
 
I think both the US and the USSR will be looking at their space programs with a critical eye cutting things down to get the most propaganda for their buck. In that case, will the Soviet Union build their own moonbase? They might opt to spend more on their space stations and robot probes instead and dismiss the moonbase as a "capitalist white elephant".


fasquardon
 
Mishin was facing quite a dilemma. The Apollo J-Class missions were obviously superior to his L3 architecture even with the multitude of upgrades made in 1971. Any perceived lead in the Space Race would need to be made in the hearts and minds of the public and not in the development of new hardware (at least for the time being). The LK shelter was still years from completion and while optimists put the launch date at 1975 it was becoming clear it would not be ready to fly until at least the first quarter of 76 if not later.

However the Soviets had achieved spaceflight leaps ahead of the Americans without upgrading a single bolt of their spacecraft. For example, the prestige value of Valentina Terreschova's first women flight was accomplished without the need for any hardware modifications or technical advancement. The Soviets hoped to pull a similar trick now.
images

Irina Solovyova was selected as the commander as an attempt to garner more public attention for the Soviet lunar landing effort. She had previously been scheduled to fly the first female Spacewalk on the all women Voskhod 5 (scheduled for late 1966) cancelled after Korolev's death. Now she would finally make her walk after all, on the surface of the Moon. The L3-5 missions was notable not only for it's commander but also it's unique destination. The lunar south pole. This was a important move not only to improve the Soviet space program's standing in the public and political eye but also to investigate what was one of the best targets for any planned permanent lunar base. In addition to the hypothetic existence of water ice the lunar south pole is also bathed in sunlight 75-80% of the time. It satisfied the often conflicting demands of science and prestige without costing a Rouble more in hardware development.
Zondn1.jpg

The mission continued the Soviet Union's increasing success rate with the N1. Despite some minor guidance errors which delayed the final Trans-Lunar Injection burn before long the dynamic duo was shooting towards the Moon at the imperceptible speed of 3.2 km/s. The second ranking Flight Engineer was Georgiy Dobrovolsky, considered to be qualified to pilot the Soyuz as it circled the Moon, alone. After the lunar orbit capture burn the Soyuz-LOK was closing in for a docking with the LK. The docking system proved hard to get right as the two only performed a "soft docking" between them. While they were physically in contact with each other they were not properly mated and opening the doors would immediately lead to depressurization.
images

So the backup plan was sprung into action. After another lunar orbit EVA (all the while waving a small red banner) Solovyova was inside the LK and the cabin was pressurized, she was ready. As Dobrovolsky filmed her LK drifting away towards the lunar surface he realized, she would be the first to visit the place where dozens and hundreds may one day live and work. Clauvius Crater.

The reference to 2001: A Space Odyssey was obvious, apparent and intentional While the decision to land near the lunar south pole was a mix of both scientific and political rationale the decision to land in Clauvius Crater was no doubt influenced by the media and public attention it would gain by doing so. The Soviets were learning the lesson that the destination is often more important than less romantic concepts like EVA duration, stay time, size of crew.
images

And so on October 1973, Clauvius base received it's first visitor. As if it was a self fulfilling prediction, 2001 was realizing itself. While Solovya was enjoying her own Space Odyssey mission planners overly concerned with her health and the possible effects of lunar gravity opted to cut short the EVA (to the anger of lunar geologists and scientists would saw some of their experiments cut). Her sampling of the lunar regolith was still enough however to determine that in small quantities (~0.5% of the regolith by mass) water ice does exist in the permanently shadowed craters of the south polar region. This sent shockwaves through the media. "Soviet Woman finds Water on Moon", "First Women on the Moon discovers Water", "Ice on Moon's South Pole" were just a few of the late-1973 newspaper headlines. It further strengthened the call for permanent lunar base even with Nixon's political controversy progressing faster than the NASA budget.
images
images

Solovyova would later write that she felt betrayed when her Moonwalk was cut short and accepted it only in hope of being chosen for a later mission. She never was, the Soviet Union's hostility to sending women in space had grown to the point where Solovyova became the last female cosmonaut for nearly a decade. She also felt she was needlessly advised to stay closer to the LK than she would have liked and wasn't allowed to really explore her diverse surroundings. Back in orbit her handshake with Dobrovolsky was also a highly political statement as he (Ukrainian) shook hands with her (Russian) comrade, partially to try and calm unrest in Ukraine over Brezhnev stagnation and partly to sell it as a Joint Soviet Republic or even International flight (after all the Ukrainian SSR and RFSR did hold different seats in the UN).
images

The return flight back saw the politics end and the majesty of the Earth from space return. Even the most die-hard Stalinist or McCarthyist had to agree, looking back at the Earth from space that our political squabbling appeared childish at best. The rest of the outbound trip was uneventful and there weren’t any major malfunctions to take note of. Upon her return she was revelled as a hero to Women around the world just as Valentina Tereshkova was a decade prior. The mission had garnered significant public attention. NASA (and an aging Von Braun) had to admit that the Soviets were good at getting press coverage (meanwhile their superior J-Class landings were passed off as "routine" and "unexciting"). Hopefully Apollo 19 would fix this with an equally exciting location. Tycho Crater! 2001 seemed closer and closer with each passing mission and each flag planted, no matter the colour.
 
Last edited:
Enjoyed reading the update.

I have to wonder what are the Delta-V challenges with landing so close to the pole if any? It seems like the soyuz left in orbit would be in basically a polar orbit. I just wonder if actually landing from a craft that is in lunar polar orbit presents challenges.
 
Enjoyed reading the update.

I have to wonder what are the Delta-V challenges with landing so close to the pole if any? It seems like the soyuz left in orbit would be in basically a polar orbit. I just wonder if actually landing from a craft that is in lunar polar orbit presents challenges.

The Block D attached to the Soyuz LOK has such a large Delta-V budget, that it can afford to stay in Polar Orbit for a few short days and make the plane-change (if that's the correct term) to get back to Earth.

But the challenge IIRC is that it takes you off a free-return trajectory so the engine has to work to get you back home.
 
1) 3.2 km/s is imperceptible? Im guessing thats a Spell Czech, but I have no idea what for.
2) Soviet women (pl) finds(s) ice? You misspell 'woman' two or three times there.
 
3.2 km/s is imperceptible in space. Your coasting all the way along with no friction, acceleration or ground rushing past to single your traveling fast (or indeed moving at all). I'l edit that to seeminly imperceptible. Sorry if that caused confusion.

Sorry I'l did proof read it but I guess you still miss stuff.
 
1) 3.2 km/s is imperceptible? Im guessing thats a Spell Czech, but I have no idea what for.
The space between the Moon and Earth while crossing at a great speed you really have no point of reference for this speed. It is kind of like traveling in a airliner at night over the ocean. You have no concept of how really fast you are moving because you have no point of reference. Multiple Apollo astronauts mention this that without looking back at the Earth you really have no concept of how fast you are moving when you go between the Earth and the Moon. Shortly after TLI or TEI you have some concept because the Moon or Earth is quickly shrinking. However most of the time you feel like you are not moving at all.
 
Apollo 17, launched in the April of 1972 would be somewhat unique missions for NASA. Since it had been selected to target a different region within the Ocean of Storms that had been previously visited by Apollo 12. Specifically the Marius Hills for Eugene Cernan (Cmdr), Ronald Evans (CMP), and Joe Engle (LMP).
images

Other than a slight technical glitch with the automatic launch sequencer, the launch and TLI coast went smoothly and within 4 days, Cernan and Engle soon found themselves as the thirteenth and fourteenth NASA astronauts to walk on the surface of the Moon.
images
images

Over the course of three days and three EVAs lasting over seven hours each, they were able to secure over 130 Kg in samples, but the important experiments lay in the Traverse Gravimeter Experiment (TGE) and the Surface Electrical Properties (SEP) Experiment. The former had been proven to be useful in the geologic investigation of the Earth, and the objective of this was to test the feasibility of using the same techniques to learn about the internal structure of the Moon. The latter involved setting up a transmitting antenna at the LEM, with a receiver on the Lunar Rover, sending signals through the lunar surface to discern the electrical properties of it by comparing the transmitted and received electrical signals. Both proved to yield productive results, and helped with the learning of what could be Lava Tubes that resided in the area (though not definitively proven at the time), perhaps usable as a shelter for a future permanent lunar base. The last major experiment was to set up a series of explosive packages at various locations, that would be remotely detonated later, to test the geophones and seismometers that had been placed by themselves and in previous missions.
images

The next key experiment was not on the Moon, but rather on the return journey. In previous missions, the crew had reported seeing “specks” or “flashes” of light when the CSM was darkened for the sleep periods during the trip to and from the Moon, and in Lunar Orbit, though not on the Lunar Surface itself. With one of them (Evans) wearing a device that would measure the strength and path of high-energy particles, the analysis of the data supported the idea that the “flashes” they saw were being caused by the particles as they struck the Retina in their eyes.
images

October 1972 was a special day for the scientific community, as along with Richard Gordon (Cmdr) and Vance Brand (CMP), the first scientist-astronaut would land on the Moon. Harrison “Jack” Schmitt (LMP). With what was also the first ever night launch of the Saturn V, the brilliant flames from the 5 F-1 engines turning midnight into dawn, they were on their way to the Gassendi crater, in the Sea of Moisture. A massive 110 Km crater that had largely been flooded by lava though the rim and peaks had remained above the surface, making it a good candidate to gain some new information about the Moon’s ancient past.
images
images

Once there, and following their first scheduled rest they set to work. Along with the sample collection, they continued the previous missions of setting up seismometers, geophones and deep-core sampling to learn of the composition of the lunar ground beneath the lava flow. Repeated too, were the explosive packages, the TGE, and SEP experiments that could penetrate the lava flows and determine the inner structure of the crater.
Apollo+17+Schmitt.jpg

Repeating these core experiments over the three days of their stay allowed them to gain good knowledge of the area, while the differences and similarities with the prior mission further aided in the understanding of the Lunar Composition, and its origins, the high similarity in materials that comprised it with the Earth increasing the support for the “impact formation” theory.
images

Returning after their three days on the Lunar Surface, they jettisoned their spent LEM Ascent Stage which was later crashed onto the Moon and recorded by the seismometers that dotted the lunar landscape. The recovery of the exposed films that had been used to provide more detailed orbital observations of the lunar surface, another Light Flash Phenomenon experiment, and routine housekeeping took up their time on their way home. Once safely aboard the recovery ship, the second-to-last ‘J’ mission, and the last Apollo mission of 1972 was complete.

1973 would be the year when their next step in Space Exploration would begin.
 

Archibald

Banned
I've just finished reading this space TL and I think the POD is rather astute - I mean, having the N-11 instead of the Proton. Never realised it could help making the N-1 more reliable and available sooner. Kind of flying bunch of N-1s, or at least the whole upper part of the thing together with its engines.

As for the other two PODs - Komarov survives and most importantly, JFK May 25 1961 speech is taken seriously by USSR, I'd say - why not ?

To me the N-11 trick is clever enough that the N-1 might be available sooner and more reliably, barely enough for USSR to beat American to the Moon.
 
I've just finished reading this space TL and I think the POD is rather astute - I mean, having the N-11 instead of the Proton. Never realised it could help making the N-1 more reliable and available sooner. Kind of flying bunch of N-1s, or at least the whole upper part of the thing together with its engines.

That was one reason for building the N11 ITTL in the first place. It allowed them to test the upper stages without having to wait for the Block A to be ready. Which meant they could find at least some of the problems and rectify them sooner.


As for the other two PODs - Komarov survives and most importantly, JFK May 25 1961 speech is taken seriously by USSR, I'd say - why not?

There were a whole manner of reasons. In 1961, NASA had yet to get a man into LEO, let alone anywhere near the Moon! Even NASA wondered if it could be done at all.


To me the N-11 trick is clever enough that the N-1 might be available sooner and more reliably, barely enough for USSR to beat American to the Moon.

It did help, though not completely. The Block B used 8 engines, 1/3 the number that the Block A needs. And they still needed to fully debug the N1 later on.
 
Top