1. Introduction
This thread is inspired by the excellent "Protect and Survive" story and it's various spinoffs. While DrakonFin is already writing an excellent spinoff suiting P&S -scenario I want to explore with my TL a nuclear war, in which my mind, would have been much more likely in 1983. A nuclear war which, by account of many reasons, might well have left Finland virtually intact. Why this happened, will be discovered.
But even more importantly I want to explore a functioning first world society in a post-nuclear war world. What decisions it would take, how would it's society and economy function? Some might say that in a P&S scenario Sweden might take this role but since as a Finn I have somewhat better insight into Finnish affairs and I also think Finland would have had better chances to escape the conflict untouched I'm exploring this route.
First parts are from a TL I tried to write some years ago, don't get stuck on that as it's mainly a background.
2. Preparations for war
During early 1980's due to surprising progress in study of kidney diseases a certain Soviet leader gained a new lease of healthy life, at least for some years.
This new lease of life gave Mr Andropov time to think about mortality of himself and the political system he had served.
Clearly the Union of Soviet Socialistic Republics is threatened on multiple fronts. On military front the threat of nuclear attack is acute and will increase dramatically in 1984. This is due to multiple developments, including Trident missiles which can be launched from points beyond Soviet satellite coverage, ALCM's and GLCM's which can use the gaps in Soviet Air Defense and finally due to Pershing IRBM's which can be used for "super swift" first strike.
To make sure that first strike will succeed, Mr Reagan is proposing the Star Wars program to eliminate threat from those Soviet missiles which probably survive the first strike. As capitalist countries are inherently evil and Soviet military machine weaker than it seems, it's clear that they might attack, perhaps masquerading some kind of Mainila shots, erm, Gleiwitz radio station incidents, first to provoke anti-Soviet feelings and finally as casus belli. Alarming intrusions by US submarines and aircraft are just the first steps. In order to safeguard Soviet Union the Operation RYAN is in effect to gather evidence on the date of the final attack.
Even without the existential threat of a nuclear attack the long term prospects for Soviet Empire do not look good at all. Even if oil prices stay high, the oil production will be smaller in the near future. The economy has missed the train of electronics revolution. The reliability of Eastern European vassals, erm, allies, is in doubt due to corruptive Western influences. In case of a large scale unrest in Eastern Europe it's doubtful whether Soviet Army can be used. Use of military force would cut off foreign funding and grain deliveries thus just adding to Soviet problems.
Thus, a way must be found to cure Soviet society of its malaise while diminishing the gap between Soviet and Western industries and making the Soviet Empire strong enough to last as a thousand years empire. Now, to use a possibly nuclear conflict to strengthen economic situation and to "cure" a nation may not sound like a good idea, but as we know, it has bee used before. For Andropov, a good example might be the Great Patriotic War, during which the Empire was spiritially united and territorially expanded, gained much respect and technological modernization. Additionally, a war would justify repression upon population on larger scale.
Andropov had to gain allies, as he's not Stalin and cannot start on course to a war by himself. Thankfully others had seen the threat to Soviet Union. Prime backers of Operation RYAN had been Marshal Ustinov (Minister of Defense, yes, Soviet Union had Minister of Defense) and Marshal Sokolov (Deputy Minister of Defense). A number of contingency plans had been written during the long years of Cold War and it was more of a task between selecting a right mix of them to implement.
In 1904 and 1941 Russia had been surprised. This time Russia would surprise it's enemies.
3. OPPLAN Morskoi Lev
EYES ONLY
From: Minister of Defense
To: Chairman of Politburo
Operational Plan Morskoi Lev - Updated as of 24 November 1983
Introduction
In general, we have overhauled our contingency plans as the older plans have been compromised by actions of enemy spies and signals intelligence, particularly by Colonel Kuklinski and American pirate submarines operating under code-name Ivy Bells.
As you know, we have a strategic warning of a impending enemy attack upon our country. It is a our legitimate right to take the appropriate action against threatening enemy forces. In any military operation there's the payoff between surprise and better correlation of forces. In case of defensive counter-attack against enemy forces, it is more important to pay attention into surprise, as succesful surprise start of the operation pays dividends in elimination of enemy weapons of mass destruction, principally nuclear weapons. As an practical example we might cite the Zionist forces in 1967 War.
While the correlation of conventional forces is favorable for us initially, although marginally, we cannot be sure of the stability of the rear within our Eastern European Allies for any length of time, which turns the correlation of conventional forces into our disadvantage.
Some of the plans tested suggested a conventional phase prior to deployment of tactical and theater nuclear weapons but this was to our disadvantage. With massive use of our chemical weapons and tactical and theater nuclear forces we can turn the correlation of conventional forces to our favour, with only using national forces, while similarly eliminating most of the enemy tactical and theater nuclear capabilities. Possible enemy retaliation against our theater nuclear operation will mostly fall upon our allies and thus be of our advantage, as it will motivate them to fight and instill anti-NATO feelings upon populace.
In surprise attack of this scale it is of utmost importance that the preparations remains secure and signal traffic before operation is not compromised. Thus we need preparation time of two weeks during which we can make the necessary preparations without alarming enemy intelligence capabilities. I also suggest that we make the attack during time when Western forces have their holiday period and our forces are still in duty. Thus I suggest that we make our move on 25 December 1983, the Western christmas period, which is also a Sunday.
For nuclear weapons, our new generation weapons such as SS-20 and SS-21 present opportunity to surgically eliminate NATO targets without much collateral damage. It must be also remembered that winter time is the most suitable time for employment of nuclear weapons without much collateral damage.
After this preliminary briefing, I will present you the operational plan Morskoi Lev. One condition which is not discussed in opplan is the stability of the rear which will be under political guidance.
Due to strict timing in a operation like this without co-operation between operations to create stability and actual military operation will be crucial.
OPPLAN MORSKOI LEV
1.) The purpose of the operation is to eliminate threat against Warsaw Pact and Soviet Union by dismantling NATO and eliminating offensive capabilities of the United States and China in Asia.
2.) Purpose of the operation will be achieved by meeting following objectives:
-Elimination of NATO offensive capabilities in Europe via political means in France, conventional means in UK and primarily by nuclear means in rest of the Europe.
-Elimination of US offensive capabilities worldwide outside US territory
-Protection of own naval strategic offensive capabilities
-Preparation to eliminate Chinese and US strategic offensive capabilities if deemed necessary
-Physical occupation of West Germany, Benelux Countries and Denmark
-Physical occupation of Northern Italy
-Forcing Norway, UK, France, Greece, Turkey and Spain into
neutrality
-Forcing Japan into neutrality
-Forcing China into neutrality
3.) Objectives will be met by following measures...
This thread is inspired by the excellent "Protect and Survive" story and it's various spinoffs. While DrakonFin is already writing an excellent spinoff suiting P&S -scenario I want to explore with my TL a nuclear war, in which my mind, would have been much more likely in 1983. A nuclear war which, by account of many reasons, might well have left Finland virtually intact. Why this happened, will be discovered.
But even more importantly I want to explore a functioning first world society in a post-nuclear war world. What decisions it would take, how would it's society and economy function? Some might say that in a P&S scenario Sweden might take this role but since as a Finn I have somewhat better insight into Finnish affairs and I also think Finland would have had better chances to escape the conflict untouched I'm exploring this route.
First parts are from a TL I tried to write some years ago, don't get stuck on that as it's mainly a background.
2. Preparations for war
During early 1980's due to surprising progress in study of kidney diseases a certain Soviet leader gained a new lease of healthy life, at least for some years.
This new lease of life gave Mr Andropov time to think about mortality of himself and the political system he had served.
Clearly the Union of Soviet Socialistic Republics is threatened on multiple fronts. On military front the threat of nuclear attack is acute and will increase dramatically in 1984. This is due to multiple developments, including Trident missiles which can be launched from points beyond Soviet satellite coverage, ALCM's and GLCM's which can use the gaps in Soviet Air Defense and finally due to Pershing IRBM's which can be used for "super swift" first strike.
To make sure that first strike will succeed, Mr Reagan is proposing the Star Wars program to eliminate threat from those Soviet missiles which probably survive the first strike. As capitalist countries are inherently evil and Soviet military machine weaker than it seems, it's clear that they might attack, perhaps masquerading some kind of Mainila shots, erm, Gleiwitz radio station incidents, first to provoke anti-Soviet feelings and finally as casus belli. Alarming intrusions by US submarines and aircraft are just the first steps. In order to safeguard Soviet Union the Operation RYAN is in effect to gather evidence on the date of the final attack.
Even without the existential threat of a nuclear attack the long term prospects for Soviet Empire do not look good at all. Even if oil prices stay high, the oil production will be smaller in the near future. The economy has missed the train of electronics revolution. The reliability of Eastern European vassals, erm, allies, is in doubt due to corruptive Western influences. In case of a large scale unrest in Eastern Europe it's doubtful whether Soviet Army can be used. Use of military force would cut off foreign funding and grain deliveries thus just adding to Soviet problems.
Thus, a way must be found to cure Soviet society of its malaise while diminishing the gap between Soviet and Western industries and making the Soviet Empire strong enough to last as a thousand years empire. Now, to use a possibly nuclear conflict to strengthen economic situation and to "cure" a nation may not sound like a good idea, but as we know, it has bee used before. For Andropov, a good example might be the Great Patriotic War, during which the Empire was spiritially united and territorially expanded, gained much respect and technological modernization. Additionally, a war would justify repression upon population on larger scale.
Andropov had to gain allies, as he's not Stalin and cannot start on course to a war by himself. Thankfully others had seen the threat to Soviet Union. Prime backers of Operation RYAN had been Marshal Ustinov (Minister of Defense, yes, Soviet Union had Minister of Defense) and Marshal Sokolov (Deputy Minister of Defense). A number of contingency plans had been written during the long years of Cold War and it was more of a task between selecting a right mix of them to implement.
In 1904 and 1941 Russia had been surprised. This time Russia would surprise it's enemies.
3. OPPLAN Morskoi Lev
EYES ONLY
From: Minister of Defense
To: Chairman of Politburo
Operational Plan Morskoi Lev - Updated as of 24 November 1983
Introduction
In general, we have overhauled our contingency plans as the older plans have been compromised by actions of enemy spies and signals intelligence, particularly by Colonel Kuklinski and American pirate submarines operating under code-name Ivy Bells.
As you know, we have a strategic warning of a impending enemy attack upon our country. It is a our legitimate right to take the appropriate action against threatening enemy forces. In any military operation there's the payoff between surprise and better correlation of forces. In case of defensive counter-attack against enemy forces, it is more important to pay attention into surprise, as succesful surprise start of the operation pays dividends in elimination of enemy weapons of mass destruction, principally nuclear weapons. As an practical example we might cite the Zionist forces in 1967 War.
While the correlation of conventional forces is favorable for us initially, although marginally, we cannot be sure of the stability of the rear within our Eastern European Allies for any length of time, which turns the correlation of conventional forces into our disadvantage.
Some of the plans tested suggested a conventional phase prior to deployment of tactical and theater nuclear weapons but this was to our disadvantage. With massive use of our chemical weapons and tactical and theater nuclear forces we can turn the correlation of conventional forces to our favour, with only using national forces, while similarly eliminating most of the enemy tactical and theater nuclear capabilities. Possible enemy retaliation against our theater nuclear operation will mostly fall upon our allies and thus be of our advantage, as it will motivate them to fight and instill anti-NATO feelings upon populace.
In surprise attack of this scale it is of utmost importance that the preparations remains secure and signal traffic before operation is not compromised. Thus we need preparation time of two weeks during which we can make the necessary preparations without alarming enemy intelligence capabilities. I also suggest that we make the attack during time when Western forces have their holiday period and our forces are still in duty. Thus I suggest that we make our move on 25 December 1983, the Western christmas period, which is also a Sunday.
For nuclear weapons, our new generation weapons such as SS-20 and SS-21 present opportunity to surgically eliminate NATO targets without much collateral damage. It must be also remembered that winter time is the most suitable time for employment of nuclear weapons without much collateral damage.
After this preliminary briefing, I will present you the operational plan Morskoi Lev. One condition which is not discussed in opplan is the stability of the rear which will be under political guidance.
Due to strict timing in a operation like this without co-operation between operations to create stability and actual military operation will be crucial.
OPPLAN MORSKOI LEV
1.) The purpose of the operation is to eliminate threat against Warsaw Pact and Soviet Union by dismantling NATO and eliminating offensive capabilities of the United States and China in Asia.
2.) Purpose of the operation will be achieved by meeting following objectives:
-Elimination of NATO offensive capabilities in Europe via political means in France, conventional means in UK and primarily by nuclear means in rest of the Europe.
-Elimination of US offensive capabilities worldwide outside US territory
-Protection of own naval strategic offensive capabilities
-Preparation to eliminate Chinese and US strategic offensive capabilities if deemed necessary
-Physical occupation of West Germany, Benelux Countries and Denmark
-Physical occupation of Northern Italy
-Forcing Norway, UK, France, Greece, Turkey and Spain into
neutrality
-Forcing Japan into neutrality
-Forcing China into neutrality
3.) Objectives will be met by following measures...