Although I always find it original to see a different conventional phase of the German theatre, I need to remind myself of the fog of war in order to suspend my disbelief for the way the Soviet offensives unfold. Or maybe I misunderstand it all.
Maybe I am a bit too stuck on General Hackett's World War III scenario, which I found quite realistic (with the exception of a stopped nuclear escalation - only a deus ex machina-putsch in the Kremlin can pull this off, see also Red Storm Rising).
What I can hardly understand is that the Soviet offensive towards Hamburg are being stopped rather cold. I can understand it around Fulda where the US Army has been preparing a defensive posture forever, also it is the closest distance from the GDR to the Rhine and losing ground cannot be allowed there. The rugged terrain there is defense-friendly, too.
But Hamburg? If you hit on a gas pedal in Western Mecklenburg once and let it roll, you already are in Hamburg - passing through absolutely tank-friendly terrain. I would have expected the Soviets to go most of the way through Lower Saxony in three days.
How is the situation in Bavaria? There seems to be an (extremely fast) Soviet thrust from Thuringia to Stuttgart which our tank-protagonist "accompagnies". But nobody ever mentions the rest of Bavaria with its mobilized NATO and Bundeswehr troops. If the Soviets coming from the CSSR don't put them through a meatgrinder, even when retreating Westwards they could, rather must, fall that aformentioned thrust on Stuttgart into the flank and into the rear.
Last but not least. Do I understand a defensive posture with their BACKSIDES close to the Rhine is NATO's answer if things go wrong? I would deem that an extremely unfortunate position, strategically, unless your idea is to give your troops an idea of not having a way out.
To put it short......this is a cry for a map!
Maybe I am a bit too stuck on General Hackett's World War III scenario, which I found quite realistic (with the exception of a stopped nuclear escalation - only a deus ex machina-putsch in the Kremlin can pull this off, see also Red Storm Rising).
What I can hardly understand is that the Soviet offensive towards Hamburg are being stopped rather cold. I can understand it around Fulda where the US Army has been preparing a defensive posture forever, also it is the closest distance from the GDR to the Rhine and losing ground cannot be allowed there. The rugged terrain there is defense-friendly, too.
But Hamburg? If you hit on a gas pedal in Western Mecklenburg once and let it roll, you already are in Hamburg - passing through absolutely tank-friendly terrain. I would have expected the Soviets to go most of the way through Lower Saxony in three days.
How is the situation in Bavaria? There seems to be an (extremely fast) Soviet thrust from Thuringia to Stuttgart which our tank-protagonist "accompagnies". But nobody ever mentions the rest of Bavaria with its mobilized NATO and Bundeswehr troops. If the Soviets coming from the CSSR don't put them through a meatgrinder, even when retreating Westwards they could, rather must, fall that aformentioned thrust on Stuttgart into the flank and into the rear.
Last but not least. Do I understand a defensive posture with their BACKSIDES close to the Rhine is NATO's answer if things go wrong? I would deem that an extremely unfortunate position, strategically, unless your idea is to give your troops an idea of not having a way out.
To put it short......this is a cry for a map!