You also called Robert Taft "Richard Taft"
See, told you that wasn't the only typo I made.
You also called Robert Taft "Richard Taft"
Forrest left the General Staff in 1944.
It would just be wonderful if you could do a biography of John Wayne, also known as the greatest actor EVER.
Good list of amendments. Just a few questions/comments:
1) Why did it take so long to ratify the anti-slavery amendment? Would that many states really oppose ratification?
I thought that a rump USA would view an anti-secession amendment as admitting that the Confederates were right, which most northerners would hate to do. I have the Bates Court hand down a ruling similar to Texas v. White in 1865, declaring secession illegal but acknowledging the right to revolution.2) Why wasn't there an amendment explicitly prohibiting secession? Seems like one would be useful in the wake of a successful southern secession to take away the legal basis for any further secession movements.
That's exactly what I had in mind.3) Would the police power amendment also establish the constitutional basis for any Socialist social welfare legislation? Seeing as how we never hear about any of their laws being invalidated by the courts, despite both Flora and Chester Martin worrying about Democrat judges, it appears they were upheld.
You're anticipating me everywhere here. The Supreme Court held in Meighen v. Thomas (1925)that occupied lands were unorganized territories unless the Federal government passed an organic act, admitted it to the Union, or ceded sovereignty; and that the Constitution did not apply to unorganized territories. (Sequoyah, which was an organized territory after being conquered by the US, was a different case from Canada, Utah, or the Sandwich Islands).4) With the US occupying Canada and so much Confederate territory after the First Great War, why wasn't there an amendment clarifying the legal status of the occupied territories (specifically whether the Bill of Rights applies in them or not.) Was there some TL-191 version of the Insular Cases that took away the need for an explicit amendment?
I thought I had one in there. My fault.5) The US switched to popularly elected Senators at some point before 1929. (Morrell mentions this fact in TCCH following the Confederate elections in 1929.) That pretty much has to be done by constitutional amendment and would fit in very well with your listed 18th Amendment.
Anyone remember when Hyperman first appeared?
Anyone remember when Hyperman first appeared?
Anti-Negro backlash, coupled with a Democratic resurgence. In OTL, Democratic congressmen and state legislatures tended to be opposed to the 13th amendment.
I thought that a rump USA would view an anti-secession amendment as admitting that the Confederates were right, which most northerners would hate to do.
For those who are interested in alternate history jurisprudence (all one of you), the Supreme Court, in order to declare a law properly enacted pursuant to the general police power, must find that it is necessary to protect or advance a compelling public interest.
You're anticipating me everywhere here. The Supreme Court held in Meighen v. Thomas (1925)that occupied lands were unorganized territories unless the Federal government passed an organic act, admitted it to the Union, or ceded sovereignty; and that the Constitution did not apply to unorganized territories. (Sequoyah, which was an organized territory after being conquered by the US, was a different case from Canada, Utah, or the Sandwich Islands).