Excellent update Dathi.
I agree - even with the retcon.
Excellent update Dathi.
On the wider picture, if the American force attacking New Orleans has already been defeated as you said Louisiana is now pretty safe and the American south is going to find itself very vulnerable. Especially if British forces start marching into it offering freedom to any slaves they come across. Depends on what they have attacking Florida. Probably also a lot of state militia who will hold the lines for the moment but can see the appetite for war in the south dwindling rapidly.
Even more so in Mexico when news of the American defeats reach the capital. Their going to realise their out on a very exposed limb and you might see some politicians argue for a drastic change in stance. ['So sorry we accidental infringed the Tejas borders' or blaming poor Gonzales for his unilateral action]. Whether it will be in time to save California I wonder. Might be in Britain's interest to make a quick peace presuming the Mexicans withdraw from Tejas. Avoids having to fight on yet another front, gets them out of there without the destruction of fighting and will probably deeper the rapidly growing gulf between Mexico and Washington.
Bleaahh! Finally
Tejas theatre, part 1
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]5 40k men at 2lb beef/man/day =80k lb. Assuming 400 lbs/animal, that's 200 animals/per day. (http://ars.sdstate.edu/MeatSci/May99-1.htm has all sorts of values for amount of meat from a cow, but it assumes a 1200lb, presumably grain fed, animal. A scrawny longhorn on the hoof should be on the lower end which is ~400lb/animal.) At that rate, a herd of 3000 head would last 15 days. Two pounds of meat/person/day may sound like a lot – but they don't have any (well, many) carbs with that, so almost all their calories are coming from meat. Of the grain they do find, much of it will have to go to their horses, to help supplement grazing, and keep them in shape. So, that gives them some 2500 calories from meat. Given that they are out, actively working, they will need more than that. However, the force is down from 40k to about 34k, so that probably balances out. (~1kg beef/man, ~180kg beef/animal in 'real' units, for non-American readers)[/FONT][FONT=Arial, sans-serif]. [/FONT]
Certainly the distribution of the cuts will be inequitable. The Mexicans are going to accept that that's just life, at least they're getting meat! Even the American common troopers are likely to understand that the officers get the steaks.Assuming perfect efficiency of distribution. In reality I suspect the quartermasters and senior officers will be eating prime steak while the guys at the bottom of the heap are struggling to make soup out of shins and tails. Which will not be good for morale or help in keeping them under control when they're looting of course.
Also, what are the native tribes doing? I'm not sure of the precise distribution, but I would have thought the Comanche in particular would have some fun with stragglers, etc...
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]Battle of the Sabine (Tejas theatre, part 1a)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]14 Timing of the blowing up of the bridge. [/FONT]Yes, it's tricky. [FONT=Arial, sans-serif]My initial thought, was that i[/FONT]t may be a guy with a cord on the bank, well hidden, who pulls on the cord and it sets off a detonator (of some sort). The guy is probably either a heroic volunteer - or expiating some serious crime... It's certainly non-trivial before electric ignition. However,[FONT=Arial, sans-serif] electrical detonation is (just) possible. OTL Colt (of Colt revolvers fame) invented a remotely activated mine using waterproofed wires in this time-frame. Obviously, we'd have to have a British inventor come up with it, or the idea be stolen from whoever invents it iTTL (which won't likely be Colt). [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]In any case, whether it's electric or a guy pulling on a cord, the remote control is possible.[/FONT]
Ah... no, not British lines. 100' - 100yds down the river bank in a blind. Colt also invented a way to waterproof the wires.Given how long the wire would have to be to reach British lines, there would be too big a risk of it being cut (not least by a horse's hoof from all that cavalry trampling around) I would have thought. A volunteer hiding in the mud would be much your best bet. Let him light a 30 second fuse, dive in the river and swim south, and with all the confusion caused by the explosion he should have at least a faint hope of living long enough for the frigate to pick him up...
But, yes, a guy clinging to the underside of the bridge or something, lighting a fuse and jumping off might work. If it's a pontoon bridge, he could be hiding in one of the boats, if necessary.
Ummm... The old one told the RN to stay out of NE waters, and the NE navy to stand down.Was this bit a typo or an indication of someone losing their job? "[FONT=Arial, sans-serif]NEW Secretary of the Navy"
Steve
[/FONT]
Ummm... The old one told the RN to stay out of NE waters, and the NE navy to stand down.
Oh, ja, we could say 'new'. The old guy is lucky if 'treason' isn't being seriously considered.... It's certainly being shouted.
No, of course not. Not ALL of it....BTW, Dathi, are you really trying to build up a case for New England to gain Long Island?
No, of course not. Not ALL of it....
**laughing out loud**
Of course you'd say that.
Seriously guys, it only makes sense it stays with NY when that's transferred.
I can see from the NE point of view that transferring much of it would safeguard their coastline and shipping in the region against future attacks, especially as weapons improve in performance.
Steve
Now you're thinking what I was thinking when I brought up the Connecticut Colony's old claims way back when.