Search results for query: *

Forum search Google search

  1. The “Magnificent Age” - Catherine II TL

    Laugh you fiend, laugh! 😉😉 I still want Inner and Outer Mongolia and Manchuria. Like in the other timeline. Here I want Lithuania too.

  2. The “Magnificent Age” - Catherine II TL

    Well OTL Poland went to almost fully to Russia, did it not? I do agree it wasn't a good thing for either of them.

  3. The “Magnificent Age” - Catherine II TL

    Thanks. While funny for a tad, it's better not to get ursine attention

  4. The “Magnificent Age” - Catherine II TL

    Folks slow chatting is not nice, please stop thanks

  5. Red Alert - Our 1953 USSR

    1 G, 2 E

  6. Barbarossa without the Great Purge

    That should indeed stay in 40k, where its fun. Here is the thing: even if it practically worked out for the best, the fact it was there, then it wasn't, then its there again, and even worse, it changed from iteration to iteration all through the interbellum only creates more chaos. Add to that...

  7. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    works for me. If you Shubham_rai then send me the numbers for 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 in a message and I'll make them fit in the sheet. Or share a sheet with me and I'll paste in my work on the budget, gdp etc.

  8. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    Hey it's your timeline, it's just I'm constantly adjusting after the fact. How about you do the numbers for 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 in a message and I'll make them fit. Plus China really needs a nerf

  9. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    Owkee, that is quite different. China still is keeping its massive boost and otl growth, the USA is doing quite a bit better, Japan is not getting the boost you asked me to give it, in fact even declining compared to OTL ($8.118.586) and the Union State barely grew compared to the $8.453.912...

  10. Barbarossa without the Great Purge

    I can be swayed to research a lot of your arguments, because they sound sensible. This however I disagree with a lot. Even if they got to the unitary command by that time, the impact of these changes back and forth will have had a big impact on the whole organisation. I've seen it time and time...

  11. Barbarossa without the Great Purge

    Interesting, where can I read more? Because as you say, those are quite common understandings (which doesn't mean they are right or wrong of itself). If it was only that, sure. However in my apparently flawed understanding I was also talking about the confused mess he left behind by...

  12. Barbarossa without the Great Purge

    The first days after the start of the war going different would have made a huge difference already e.g. If Stalin didnt freeze his troops. Let alone having people that actually have trained with their equipment and the deep operations tactics. If you add an airforce that isn't destroyed on the...

  13. Red Alert - Our 1953 USSR

    Old school conservative communists, the only reason to pick one of them is to slide back in time. Plus they supported Stalin 's policies. Useless lot God no. While not the worst choice, still not a great leader. Plus on a personal note: he cancelled heavy tanks. The fucker 😉 Maybe. He's...

  14. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    I can see your point, but neither the Chinese nor USA will allow us to get closer then we are (or they will increase spending too), and that the the same race to the bottom as the cold war one. 2% however is the NATO norm, and no one can complain about that. Between that and our nuclear...

  15. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    Resources buddy. Afghanistan was for resources essential in chips, Uzbekistan gold and other strategic minerals, Tadjikistan has aluminum, Kyrgyzstan has minerals, Kazakhstan oil and uranium, Turkmenistan has oil and gas. Honestly the latter is the least valuable to the Union, but the first 4 (5...

  16. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    A 😝😉

  17. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    Nuclear is MAD, both as mad and as M.A.D. Conventionally defence we can give the USA, but even NATO a run for it's money. The training and equipment is there. It's motivation, luck and experience that gives either the edge. Conventionally offensive, forget defeating the USA. While we could...

  18. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    The USSR didn't need the resources in the Stans that much. A Semiconductor / ICT based society as the Union State does though. Why do you think the USA now has bases there? Hint: it's not because of Russia.

  19. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    That all works. So we grow naturally better then expected, we have less death by virtue of our fight against addictive substances including tobacco and alcohol, plus much much better healthcare. And let's not underestimate the lessened stress due to a much better education system, job...

  20. A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation

    You got me thinking: both @panpiotr and myself might have missed the GDP per capita. Say the Union State has 200,000,000 inhabitants in 2028. The $27.576.445 million GDP, gives us a per capita number of $ 137,882.22. That is a lot. The most recent numbers I could find with a quick Google were...
Top