yeah, was trying to stick with the OP, for no cruisers or destroyers, not sure exactly where you would draw the line? we are right on it with Bremse, 1939 & 1944 TBs?
also not exactly sure how this would work having no large ships able to operate with the capital ships? guess a change in...
I think we would have put a few steps in to make sure, dry docks could build it. So say keep dry docks OTL and something behind player control would be a way to do this
Indeed. Esad Pasha's betrayal will spark an overhaul of the pasha system.
Tibet isn't actually British at this time. Tibet was universally recognized as a de jure part of China even though it was De facto independent.
Perhaps in the future. But for now China remains on the side of the entente...
Skyfall by Adele starts to play as American and Soviet troops enter Japan, and Adele herself appears in the sky singing.
Seriously, I'm sure the USSR will also have KIA's if they suffer as bad as the Americans and have their death count even higher than OTL (also applies to the Americans). The...
But, then, cheating discovered, what happens? Abrogate the treaty? 90,000 to 100,000 ton battleships and carriers in 1939? I would think some guaranteed cheating would be the only way some people would willingly play an Axis country...
Considering Japan's capability a few destroyers in the med is possible but other than that I don't really think the Japanese have the capacity to project naval power in the north sea
To be fair Keding was a lot more popular than his father as well and the Yuan originally wanted him to become emperor otl as well. About success, well we will see if it remains a success or not.