Search results for query: *

Forum search Google search

  1. No Kriegsmarine cruisers or modern destroyers

    That's not true. Once the war started Chamberlain never talked about making peace with Hitler. I also don't see him throwing away Hurricane Squadrons in a lost fight in France. The RAF would still likely win the Battle of Britain. When he fell ill with cancer latter in 1940 Churchill would...
  2. TheSwedishHistorian

    AHC: Coptic Nation-State in North Africa

    The coptic population in Egypt is actually quite sizeable in Egypt with about 10 million of them or roughly 10%-16%. One of the problems is that coptics were further down the river, so no viable independent state could exist with only part of the river in these days, as the river is a big form...
  3. Impirius

    The New Order: Last Days of Europe Thread II

    This is a thing? How do people convince themselves that Stalin was progressive in any way?
  4. SirHalifax

    The New Order: Last Days of Europe Thread II

    You’re referring to Khrushchev. Yes, TNO Khrushchev is a diehard Stalinist.
  5. What-if SMG for late 1930s and on

    US Army was surely aware of Thopmson's drawbacks already in the 1920s, indeed it's high price and weight will be very visible, the former shortcoming will be especially be visible by late 1920s/early 30s due to the economic crisis and lower budget for Army needs. They also know that in many...
  6. WWII: German Victory in Battle of Britain, could USSR win alone?

    ... plus OTL I guess some would still be in Germany etc. Of course, it's not just tanks, also aircraft etc. However, if we POD some time prior to invasion of Poland (which, if Hitler plans to drive on through Poland to Moscow, is a 'must'), we have that usual magic ingedient 'Handwavium' working...
Top