Search results

i would have had more time in my childhood

and sorry every source out of china is most likely propaganda. China has state press. If a source than please japanese OR european or at least american or austrialian or sth.. but not chinese.

Where did i write korea seized land of china? what the hell are you talking about.. and im not trolling neither i think you can make a "ranking" of worst nations in ww2... I think thats rather nationalistic. I actually wrote a very long wall of text, i deleted it just now again, cause i think...

i dont really see it as excuse, but as a fact. but okay

Germany, Britain, France, i dont know them all.. how about a lot? And if japan would not have taken parts of china, russia would have. same for korea. look up the reasons for the japanese russian war And actually, no i am not trolling. And i dont see a reason to get banned either. I didnt say...

Thats the only thing concerns me right now too.. but we might find a solution too. You dont need much soldiers for a war anyway, 40 million japanese with superior technology will do the thing vs billions of chinese. We will see.

i know that people answered on my questions, so actually my question is solved anyway. Your post though was very informative, although if we are honest japan didnt act much worse than the west did in colonization age didnt it? Because people are acting like japan is like the most evil nation in...

Actually japan will have the nuke soon enough to prevent it, cause the new govnernment works on it. Also i am not really scared of other countrys anymore, cause the new government want to abolish the pacifistic terms in the condition and rebuild military. If there will be a new war, japan will...

rather impossible. Japan saw the war as a holy crusade. Not as a "normal war". The war was in fact not intended by the government in the first place, the japanese army kind of did what it wanted. You can look it up just search for the japanese army, you will see that the japanese army kind of...

Damn i looked it up in the net. You are right. "Just before his death, Piłsudski told Józef Beck that it must be Poland's policy to maintain neutral relations with Germany and keep up the Polish alliance with France, and to improve relations with the United Kingdom" My mistake there. So...

And the same i wrote before. i didnt write they used it, but they wanted to. I didnt got the name of the operation, but the one they wanted invade japan with. So downfall yes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuril_Islands_dispute I just thought its common knowledge.

But hitler nearly "sucessed" i believe. Pilsudski or however was his name (who was first an total enemy of hitler, even trying to bring france to attack germany), became rather close to hitler. Hitler was even on his funeral. If he didnt die, most likely they had allied. The guys after him just...

There are also island disputes with russia, wich are really core territorys... the senkaku islands can may be viewed as contested, but not the islands russia took from us. And i dont denie the massacring raping and other committmens, sure that happened. But i doubt that americans didnt do...

you cant know if everything in your history books i true either. And i really doubt americans numbers are all right too. Alone the estimated casualitys of the united states with an invasion of japan.. i wonder why there should be 80.000 american and 10.000.000 japanese dead when america would...

Probably i have put the question wrong.. but some people figured out what i ment. I ment, would have America declared war on Japan, even if japan didnt allie with hitler NOR attack pearl harbour. So assuming japan would have just led his AGGRESSIVE wars vs other asian countrys, but NEVER...

I dont think so actually, lets assume japan would have really cooperated with germany and didnt declare war on china, but led a war vs russia first. And 2nd.. its nonsense that japan stands no chance vs russia. There was a short japanese sowjet war...

I wonder where i ever denied japan was the aggressor in the sino japanese war. Nor i have asked if japan had a choice attacking china, its all about if the US would have declared war vs japan, if it would have NEVER joined the axis, after germany had fallen.

Did japan really act like the aggressor in ww2 with attacking pearl harbour? Wasnt it like the USA builded up airforce and even draw plans of leading war vs japan, and attack plans long before pearl harbour? So if japan would have just continued its war with china, dont you think that the USA...

If the USA wouldnt help the entente in WW1 at all, most likely Germany would have won. no i am actually pretty sure they would have, cause with the east army free and hindenburg in the west, i dont think france and britain would have won at all. I thin either Germany won and France surrendered...