Search results

Sorry I've been away from the thread in awhile. There was a statement made about entry into agriculture as a way to establish and keep the cities in check. There was also a good point brought up if limits were placed on cities and they expanded to those limits. Finally a point was brought up...

It'll take a lot of convincing I would go back to 1945 and convince or subvert decisions so the U.S will follow Patton's plan and kick the U.S.S.R. out of Europe and back to Moscow.

I have looked at a bunch of towns and cities that back in the day could have had growth limits put around them. A lot of the towns would have benefited from a tighter growth, leading to downtowns and mainstreets surviving. If the towns grew to the established growth line, maybe smaller towns...

I like to imagine a scenario where Chrysler goes bankrupt in 1996 and a surviving International Harvester buys up the truck/suv division to get back into the automotive market. A surviving AMC could buy up other pieces and Toyota gets the rest. Having AMC survive well into the 1990s and beyond...

If one wants to stop sprawl, use theMann as an example. Incorporate public transportation and railroads with the interstate act. Also pull off something that makes people realize that the U.S. will have to feed the world. Saving it could be an emotional topic at first. It will limit urban...

1. Timeline:Transport America Redux 2. Model Name/Manufacturer: Harvester H300/ IHC Motors 3. Model Type: 4 Door Dually Long Bed 1 Ton 4. Model Year: 2003 5. Nation of Origin: United States 6. Production run: 2003-present day 7. Number built: 300,000 per year 8. Engine: 7.3L 444CI Turbo Diesel...

I enjoy reading and thinking about the bright future the US could have possibly had. It also makes me overjoyed that more people believe in more city density and less emphasis on suburbs.

Would the downtowns and mainstreets of the cities be saved in this TL? The interstate system helped to drive more people out of the cities and into suburbs; strip malls and disintegration of most downtowns. It seems as though it would have at least saved some of the nostalgia.

I was wondering if you were going to go into the next decade; 2010-2020. It might be a little challenging, but from this TL, it seems relatively stable. Also, did the U.S. get involved in the current 2 warzone situation ITTL that is going on in OTL?

Would the U.S. have ever engaged in manifest destiny to secure a economic or war riddled Mexico or Latin America. Also would Panama have become a state if the U.S. had kept it? I'm not trying to make the U.S. land hungry, just reasonable potential new land areas.

Could the Dominican Republic or Cuba ever be considered? Also what about the Philippines or Sicily being brought in as states because of WWII?

What states could the United States have in the year 2010. I would be keeping most of the 50 states except maybe merging the Dakotas together and merging Idaho into Montana, Utah, and Washington. An example of a plausible new state would be Puerto Rico.