Search results

This version of KMT might be stronger than OTL too, having expanded and modernized the army and industry better with German support.

How is the naval war between the Allies and ACP going ? I assume, better than IOTL as the ACP control Gibraltar, they have Spain and France... But still bad. Even combined, ACP navies are not a match for the RN and USN (and whatever remains of the Red Navy)

Why do I see the USA actually winning in 43-45 in Oceania (as they already have some victories and the USN will soon far outbuild and outnumber the IJN)... And force Japan to renounce those Oceanian conquests (but let Japan keep China, DEI, Malaya, Indochina and Burma), so a hollow US victory...

Then I want news of fronts in Africa and Middle East.

Indeed, and the Allies don't need precise definite knowledge. They just need to heavily suspect or vaguely know such programs exist, and then if they don't know how advanced they are, they won't take the risk. WMDs that might well be there can be as dissuasive as confirmed WMDs.

There's also the little fact that ITTL, Japan is in a stronger position, in other words, can retaliate with chemical weapons on Australia and possibly NZ if the USA manage to nuke Japan. Worse, if Germany (or France) is nuked, Britain automatically gets gassed (as both French and Germans either...

I don't think there will be an invasion of Britain during WWII. The Axis already has its collective hands full with smashing the Soviets, fighting in Africa and Middle East. Also, they don't have the resources or industry for a proper transport fleet across the Channel, nor for a combat fleet...

War. Don't get me wrong, I like the worldbuilding, but in the last months the actual war story has slowed much, as there are more worldbuilding chapters.

Somehow, I can see Roosevelt and Churchill panicking in late '43-early '44 and launching a botched Sledgehammer in Europe, too soon too fast. Then, the failure of the operation causes a massive anti-war movement in the USA and British Empire. In Soviet Union, generals had remained faithful to...

Well, that's not mutually exclusive, you can also die on your knees... Like the current British Empire will.

The Pacific States of America will look like a giant Japanese port... Complete with other overpopulated Asian countries exporting their surplus population there too. Australia might remain closed right after WWII. However, if the War of British Humiliation happens (with Italy retaking East...

Didn't the Allies take Madagascar ?

So, post-war, Japan will try to woo the Jewish State of Madagascar away from the ACP ?

Also, if we somehow handwave the WMDs, NATO would likely win the conventional war (at great cost)... But the guerilla and occupation would make Afghanistan look like a walk in the park.

And had the USA being affected by Magical Mass Idiocy, then West Germany, UK and France (and likely other countries) would have been like "Nope".

Indeed, not only the theoritical "why" (as on paper, we could surely find some reasons of "why NATO would attack Soviets", even if at this time it seems silly as USSR is already crumbling so better to let it fall on its own). But also the more practical "How did NATO nations managed to agree to...

Also why would NATO do that ?

Russia might rally around its leaders. Other WP countries might not be keen on NATO invading (even for "liberation" purposes) their territory and fighting on their soil. Especially if Germans are actively involved.

Soviet Union may crumble first...

With Russia getting screwed hard, say hello to American "West Alaska" (ie. Kamtchatka and possibly more of Eastern Siberia)...