Search results

Rule Britannia forever will she rule rule the waves, thats why I think.

Yeah that as well they would risking huge investments that could be used better almost anywhere else. Even if the ships just stayed in home waters they better used then being sunk in the lawerence if they threw away they're fleet they're continental eniemes would ponce on them. So they never...

The Americans could very easily destroy those locks it one first things I think would do really so none of what you put matters. The British simply aren't going to get their boats on the lakes.

In total war I don't she how it couldn't be conquered your talking about britain bombarding America's cities that's not going to be forgotten. If a weaker less powerful nation attacks a stronger nation it never ends well for the weaker nation that's just basic common sense.

The real question is what would America do after Britain has been utterly defeated ? As it surely would be being a unstable empire made of semi autonomous regions as well as a multiude of tributary states with a less industry and population the America. I imagine the actual fighting would be...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples Look at the map.

That's what happened in history though.

If polical correctness didn't immediately turn to extremism they're wouldn't have been a backlash but that goes against the nature of polical correctness core supporters.

It really doesn't matter what the Mormons intents we're if the U.S Army had decided they were hostile. I think if they resisted the intial attack they would have been crushed barring some act of God.

Well their was the whole racial angle.

I think Wodrow Wilson wanted this but I am not sure on the details.

This is sort of what the Nation of Islam is already.

No the British were just as vulnerable as any other country in fact they're little empire was sort of a extremist racasist state.

The Tang were really into human sacrifice I think.

Somehow relevant

Well they probably did eat people on the eastern front but due them starving not as a result of a specific policy.

It is fun for some of us to talk about and read aboutthat's why something like calbears Angelo American nazi war is so poplar.

Central Asia plus the east of the Middle East probably they could have done far better.

It is a dicusstion board though and I really don't see why canniablism should be censored, it's not like it's beyond the nazis. Anyways talking about ww2 people eaters didn't the Japanese eat some people or that not true?

Don't cut your self on that edge buddy.