Search results

That seems pretty kinda skeezy to take over someone elses timeline. Also you probably should preface it or epilogue it with what's actually different considering it's enormous length at this point.

Why would you quote that entire thing. jesus christ.

Probably because most conservatives don't surround them with media that challenges their worldview.

Reread the post it's in the second line.

Germany didn't have the resources either.

I don't think an institutional decision is the same thing as a guy being a serial killer in a manner completely unrelated to his occupation.

Why would there be a hint of something that wasn't even conceived in till twenty years after the films shooting.

Yes and that's why he's our most-valued poster.

The rubble of course.

Oh my apologies. I had like twenty tabs from this site open and I guess I forgot what board I was hitting new topic in. Though I don't see why in the case of china the USSR would need america's help. Did the USSR lack missile submarines in the pacific during that time?

Is it possible for a country during the cold war to piss off the international community so much that both the United States and the USSR temporarily co-operate in conducting some manner of regime change? The limit on the POD is probably irrelevant but let's just go with after '41.

Well at least any doubt that it works is subdued. Not that there was much to begin with.

More importantly: Would it actually work? it seems like you'd run out of pigeons fast.

Why didn't the allies just drop a twenty megaton bomb on berlin instead of anthraxing it? In fact did any of the retaliatory strikes exceed one megaton? It seems if the allies hadn't held back they could have actually stopped the reich's economy in its tracks immediately instead of the slow...

Does Sony have any sort of manufacturing advantage over Sega that would make a CD console developed by them cheaper? Maybe if the consoles cheaper people will be less upset about the lack of games and Sega can try to fix the fmv-skewed library?

There are plenty of valid military targets even if none of them contain scud missiles Cook.

Dead hand checks for multiple cities in Russia to show signs of being nuked.

Wouldn't it be short knives in that case?

people freak out anyways and don't realize the shielding is too strong for a jet plane to breach?

but the studies show that was the most common type of battle. Therefore isn't it the scenario we should base our conclusions in the most? It seems like you are only picking the data that favors your side