Search results

... sorry, do you mean I posted it in 'Before 1900'? Really? Gaah... that's not a good start - I haven't / hardly been on forum for some years, so coming back and doing that straight off the bat isn't good. Thought I checked this first... no wonder I couldn't find it myself! Anyway. Thank you...

Some background first. The second UK Labour government (1929-31) was elected at a difficult time - it was a minority government (supported by the Liberal party), and spent much of its time in office grappling with the economic issues stemming from the Great Depression. Yes, most of my links in...

This is my first post on the board since... *goes to check* wow, late 2010. Have popped back occasionally, but just not posted anything. However, I read through this timeline on and off over the course of several months, and thought I ought to say something. Do you have any plans to publish...

Eeeeexcellent... :)

Um, I think the idea was they were using nuclear power, not nuclear bombs... though a) I haven't read it for a while, and b) I think it's only mentioned in passing in a vague way anyway.

Hi Meadow! Just wondering what's going on with this one... please don't give up!

bump-a-bump

Anything further going on? Or is this one dead? (Please note: I've just come back to the forum after unintentionally being away for three months or so. I apologise if there might be some thread necromancy, as I catch up and comment on a few things.)

... dammit, Batman! Don't put your hand there! You're BATMAN! She's the Joker! It'll never work

Goodgood... would be much appreciated, this is truly excellent.

That's... what the... :D

I'd say more like Daniel Craig: Quite scary...

I'm interested too... don't think I've commented before though :p

Um... because?

Probably because sometimes people look at a thread, read through what's been written, have nothing more to add, and move on. I was just observing that you're not going to get anything out of the OP :)

So, you've decided to resurrect a thread where the last post was in 2007, and both the OP and the other main poster have since been banned. OK...

Uh, yes... but that doesn't answer my question! :)

Nooooo! Aw, if you must... well, I hope you can work it out. Please give us a link here when you start the thing again. I've certainly enjoyed this :).

"Your thoughts"? I like! One small criticism though - you might want to ignore your spell checker:It all came apart for the XII and XV corps... in theory they should have had over 75 thousand men and 500 tanks to defend themselves... however after 4 weeks of open throttle advance, breakdowns...

I didn't know they had conditioner in the 1400s... :p (That's a point, actually. Did they have something that served the same purpose? I don't know.)