Search results

Tonight, I did two 1860 Lincoln/Hamlin runs: in the first one, I run on abolitionism, homestead and high tariffs but lost voters with support for civil rights, going to visit Seward and doing speeches in New York. I got a hung college. In the second run, I did the same excepted I opposed civil...

However, some powers such as Belgium and Portugal were less favorable to local self-government, even from settlers.

Depends of how the WW2 ends, and how the winners get victory. If the Western powers are as weakened and impoverished as OTL, I can't see colonialism last longer; OTOH, if they avoid the world wars and if they manage to involve local elites (more local authonomy and more rights for natives) then...

Why would Japan attack Siberia when more interesting items awaited them south? For exemple, they would need oil for their troops; this is why they attacked Indonesia.

With more New England states, how would react Southern colonies? Would they ask for more slave states to compensate? Would they even accept to sign this Constitution or will they ask for other clauses?

There's another factor to consider: the Baltic states were sovereign countries for one entire generation.

For exemple, large naval bases.

Taiwan might be doable but Korea might be more difficult, due to a larger population, a less favorable treatment and more nationalistic tendencies. Koreans living in the Home Islands managed to be elected to the Diet, and the former Korean imperial family became part of the kazoku. Okinawa...

Maybe if they sent more Slavic settlers to drown out the population.

Given the state of the German military, how much would officers thought this war would be disastrous, and what could have been their reaction (see Oster)?

The James Eastland presidency after both Goldwater and his VP died in a plane accident sure didn't help things.

They went on an suatus quo ante bellum, which was simpler to do.

So, depending of whether a Jacksonian democracy will occur, will the Trail of Tears occurs sooner? And how will Southern society evolve if they went from the OTL latifundism to TTL yeomen? Would politicians such as Calhoun still end getting elected to serve the landed gentry?

Small nations with large colonial empire tend to have common interests.

With the Frontier closed for now, how will American colonists expand themselves? OTL, some claimed it was a safety valve to prevent social dissent by sending poorer sectors off West. And it seems Southern states are larger, maybe due to the fact most of the colonies' charters allowed them to...

As said Calbear: "In the ATL, the worst is simply a much clearer vision, one that is still killing tens of thousands in Europe 30 years after the war ended. "

With such divisions, will India even be united?

Who's the Southern candidate in this case?

I bet he still fought for the Axis and dued during fighting or being purged after liberation, since he might be too much extremist for the Lyon Republic.

I heard they included screens about Wallace winning on 1968 but I didn't knew they planned cases of ties.